Mutations in NSCLC and their link with lung cancer-associated thrombosis: A case-control study

The role of germline and somatic mutations in predicting cancer-associated thrombosis: a narrative review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with cancer have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Guidelines suggest to use risk assessment tools to guide decisions about thromboprophylaxis, but current tools have modest discriminatory ability. Genetic information from the germline or tumor has the potential to improve VTE prediction. Here, we provide a clinical overview of the current role of genetics in cancer-associated VTE.

RECENT FINDINGS

Germline mutations, such as factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A, are associated with a 2- to 2.5-fold increased VTE risk in patients with cancer. Tumor-specific somatic mutations also contribute to VTE risk, such as ALK rearrangements increasing the risk in nonsmall cell lung cancer and IDH1 mutations decreasing the risk in gliomas. Other somatic mutations associated with VTE independent of tumor type include KRAS , STK11 , MET , KEAP1 , CTNNB1 , and CDKN2B . Incorporating data on germline or somatic mutations in risk scores improves discriminatory ability compared with the Khorana score.

SUMMARY

Specific germline and somatic mutations are associated with an increased VTE risk in patients with cancer and potentially improve performance of clinical risk scores. The increasing and widespread use of genetic testing in cancer care provides an opportunity for further development of prediction models incorporating genetic predictors.

Predicting a failure of postoperative thromboprophylaxis in non-small cell lung cancer: A stacking machine learning approach

BACKGROUND

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and its surgery significantly increase the venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk. This study explored the VTE risk factors and established a machine-learning model to predict a failure of postoperative thromboprophylaxis.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with NSCLC who underwent surgery between January 2018 and November 2022. The patients were randomized 7:3 to the training and test sets. Nine machine learning models were constructed. The three most predictive machine-learning classifiers were chosen as the first layer of the stacking machine-learning model, and logistic regression was the second layer of the meta-learning model.

RESULTS

This study included 362 patients, including 58 (16.0%) with VTE. Based on the multivariable logistic regression analysis, age, platelets, D-dimers, albumin, smoking history, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 21 mutation were used to develop the nine machine-learning models. LGBM Classifier, RandomForest Classifier, and GNB were chosen for the first layer of the stacking machine learning model. The area under the received operating characteristics curve (ROC-AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the stacking machine learning model in the training/test set were 0.984/0.979, 0.949/0.954, 0.935/1.000, and 0.958/0.887, respectively. In the validation set, the final stacking machine learning model demonstrated an ROC AUC of 0.983, accuracy of 0.937, sensitivity of 0.978, and specificity of 0.947. The decision curve analyses revealed high benefits.

CONCLUSION

The stacking machine learning model based on EGFR mutation and clinical characteristics had a predictive value for postoperative VTE in patients with NSCLC.

Comprehensive review of thrombophilia: pathophysiology, prevalence, risk factors, and molecular diagnosis

Thrombophilia, characterized by an imbalance between fibrinolysis and coagulation leading to inappropriate blood clotting, is a significant medical condition. The CDC has designated it as an underdiagnosed, serious, and potentially preventable disorder, contributing to an estimated 600,000-900,000 cases and 100,000 deaths annually in the United States. These figures surpass the combined annual mortality of AIDS, breast cancer, and motor vehicle accidents. The pathogenesis of thrombophilia involves complex interactions between genetic predispositions, such as mutations in Factor V Leiden, Factor II, MTHFR, and Serpine-1, and environmental factors, including unhealthy lifestyles, prolonged hospitalization, obesity, and cancer. Prevalence of specific genetic mutations varies across populations. Additional risk factors include age, family history, and pregnancy, with recent attention to increased susceptibility in SARS-CoV-2 infection. While molecular diagnostic techniques are available, there remains a need for robust, cost-effective, and accurate screening methods for large populations. This systematic review provides an updated overview of thrombophilia, encompassing pathophysiology, epidemiology, genetic and environmental risk factors, coagulation cascade, population-specific mutation prevalence, and diagnostic approaches. By synthesizing clinical and molecular evidence, this review aims to guide researchers, hematologists, and clinicians in the diagnosis and management of thrombophilia.

Arterial Thromboembolism in Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer: Secondary Analyses of the Rising-VTE/NEJ037 Study

BACKGROUND

Cancer-associated thromboembolism has been thoroughly investigated in previous studies, and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were established for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the risks of cancer-associated arterial thromboembolism (ATE) and the efficacy of DOACs remain unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the risk factors and the clinical activity of edoxaban (EDO) for the prevention of ATE in patients with advanced lung cancer.

METHODS

From the prospective Rising-VTE/NEJ037 study which investigated VTE in newly diagnosed advanced lung cancer, we investigated the incidence rate and the risk factors of ATE as secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

A total of 1008 patients were screened for VTE at study baseline and were followed up for 2 years. Excluding patients with a contraindication to DOACs, those with VTE were treated with EDO. ATE events were identified in 41 patients (4.1%). The most common location for ATE was cerebral infarction (N = 31, 75.6%), followed by myocardial infarction (N = 4, 9.8%). Multivariate analysis determined the incidence of VTE, D-dimer, a comorbidity of atrial fibrillation, and four other factors as independent risk factors of ATE. For VTE (+) patients, the incidence rate of ATE was 15.9% for the EDO administration (+) patients, compared with 11.1% for the EDO administration (-) patients (p = 0.626).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence rate of ATE was 4.1% over 2-year follow-up in advanced lung cancer patients. VTE was further identified as an independent risk factor for ATE, while intervention with DOACs was seen as less effective for the prevention of ATE in advanced lung cancer patients with VTE.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs061180025).

Trousseau's Syndrome in Lung Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Study in a Japanese Community Hospital

Trousseau's syndrome is a cancer-associated thromboembolism that significantly impacts patients' prognosis and quality of life (QOL). This study aimed to investigate the frequency, characteristics, and prognosis of Trousseau's syndrome in lung cancer patients at a Japanese community hospital and examine the effects of therapeutic agents on this condition. We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of lung cancer patients diagnosed with thrombotic complications at the time of diagnosis in our department between August 2013 and April 2019. Patients' characteristics, thromboembolism sites, treatments, and prognosis were analyzed. Among 956 lung cancer patients, 19 (2%) had Trousseau's syndrome. The median age was 65 years, and adenocarcinoma was the most common histologic type (78.9%). The most common site of thromboembolism was the brain (84.2%). The median survival time was 84 days, and 52.6% of patients died within 90 days of diagnosis. Patients who survived longer than 90 days tended to have a higher frequency of non-adenocarcinoma histology, EGFR gene mutations, and therapeutic induction with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Trousseau's syndrome in lung cancer patients is associated with poor prognosis. Histologic type, EGFR mutation status, and treatment with ICI may influence the prognosis. Future larger-scale studies are needed to validate these potential prognostic factors and to develop personalized treatment strategies.

Gynecological Cancer and Venous Thromboembolism: A Narrative Review to Increase Awareness and Improve Risk Assessment and Prevention

The prevention and appropriate management of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients is of paramount importance. However, the literature data report an underestimation of this major problem in patients with gynecological cancers, with an inconsistent venous thromboembolism risk assessment and prophylaxis in this patient setting. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the available evidence regarding the management of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients, focusing on the specific context of gynecological tumors, exploring the literature discussing risk factors, risk assessment, and pharmacological prophylaxis. We found that the current understanding and management of venous thromboembolism in gynecological malignancy is largely based on studies on solid cancers in general. Hence, further, larger, and well-designed research in this area is needed.

In Search of the Perfect Thrombosis and Bleeding-Associated Cancer Scale

Thrombosis and bleeding are commonly observed in cancer patients, and their management is crucial for positive patient outcomes. A comprehensive, prophylactic, and therapeutic management of venous thrombosis should focus on identifying the patients who would benefit most from treatment to reduce mortality and minimize the risk of thrombosis recurrence without significantly increasing the risk of bleeding. Existing cancer scales provide valuable information for assessing the overall burden of cancer and guiding treatment decisions, but their ability to predict thrombotic and bleeding events remains limited. With increasing knowledge of the pathophysiology of cancer and the availability of advanced anticancer therapies, new risk factors for cancer-associated thrombosis and bleeding are being identified. In this report, we analyze the current literature and identify new risk factors for venous thrombosis and bleeding which are not included in routinely used risk scores. While some existing cancer scales partially capture the risk of thrombosis and bleeding, there is a need for more specific and accurate scales tailored to these complications. The development of such scales could improve risk stratification, aid in treatment selection, and enhance patient care. Therefore, further research and development of novel cancer scales focused on thrombosis and bleeding are warranted to optimize patient management and outcomes.

Lung Cancer Related Thrombosis (LCART): Focus on Immune Checkpoint Blockade

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a common complication in lung cancer patients. Lung cancer confers an increased risk of thrombosis compared to other solid malignancies across all stages of the disease. Newer treatment agents, including checkpoint immunotherapy and targeted agents, may further increase the risk of CAT. Different risk-assessment models, such as the Khorana Risk Score, and newer approaches that incorporate genetic risk factors have been used in lung cancer patients to evaluate the risk of thrombosis. The management of CAT is based on the results of large prospective trials, which show similar benefits to low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in ambulatory patients. The anticoagulation agent and duration of therapy should be personalized according to lung cancer stage and histology, the presence of driver mutations and use of antineoplastic therapy, including recent curative lung surgery, chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Treatment options should be evaluated in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has been shown to impact the thrombotic risk in cancer patients. This review focuses on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk factors, novel predictive scores and management of CAT in patients with active lung cancer, with a focus on immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Incidence of venous thromboembolism and association with PD-L1 expression in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with first-line chemo-immunotherapy

Background

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious complication in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The use of thromboprophylactic therapy is subject to an accurate assessment of the VTE risk depending on patients, tumor characteristics and type of systemic antineoplastic treatments. However, little is known concerning the risk of VTE in patients suffering from an advanced NSCLC treated with first-line chemo-immunotherapy and the impact of tumor biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression.

Methods

We performed a retrospective, observational, single-centre study in a cohort of advanced NSCLC patients treated with first-line chemo-immunotherapy. The primary endpoint was the incidence of VTE. Secondary endpoints were the cumulative incidence of VTE, the impact of PD-L1 on VTE occurrence, overall survival, the rate of VTE recurrence under anticoagulant treatment and the rate of bleeding complications.

Results

109 patients were included, of whom 21 (19.3%) presented a VTE event during a median follow-up of 13 months. VTE incidence at 3, 6 and 12 months was 12.1%, 15.1% and 17.5% respectively. 61% were pulmonary embolisms, 9.5% were isolated deep vein thrombosis and 14.3% were central venous catheter-related thrombosis. Our study did not show a significant impact of PD-L1 on VTE occurrence. Overall survival at 6, 12 and 24 months was 81.9%, 74.4% and 70.3% respectively. Four patients developed a recurrent VTE under anticoagulation therapy 3 to 5 months after the first VTE event. One patient suffered from a major bleeding complication while under anticoagulation therapy, leading to death.

Conclusion

VTE is a common complication in advanced NSCLC patients treated with concomitant chemo-immunotherapy. In our study, 19.3% of patients developed a VTE during a median follow-up of 13 months. PD-L1 did not appear to be associated with VTE occurrence. We recorded high VTE recurrence rates despite anticoagulant treatment. Further investigations are needed to determine if high PD-L1 expression is associated with VTE.

Oncogenes and cancer associated thrombosis: what can we learn from single cell genomics about risks and mechanisms?

Single cell analysis of cancer cell transcriptome may shed a completely new light on cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). CAT causes morbid, and sometimes lethal complications in certain human cancers known to be associated with high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), pulmonary embolism (PE) or arterial thromboembolism (ATE), all of which worsen patients' prognosis. How active cancers drive these processes has long evaded scrutiny. While "unspecific" microenvironmental effects and consequences of patient care (e.g., chemotherapy) have been implicated in pathogenesis of CAT, it has also been suggested that oncogenic pathways driven by either genetic (mutations), or epigenetic (methylation) events may influence the coagulant phenotype of cancer cells and stroma, and thereby modulate the VTE/PE risk. Consequently, the spectrum of driver events and their downstream effector mechanisms may, to some extent, explain the heterogeneity of CAT manifestations between cancer types, molecular subtypes, and individual cases, with thrombosis-promoting, or -protective mutations. Understanding this molecular causation is important if rationally designed countermeasures were to be deployed to mitigate the clinical impact of CAT in individual cancer patients. In this regard, multi-omic analysis of human cancers, especially at a single cell level, has brought a new meaning to concepts of cellular heterogeneity, plasticity, and multicellular complexity of the tumour microenvironment, with profound and still relatively unexplored implications for the pathogenesis of CAT. Indeed, cancers may contain molecularly distinct cellular subpopulations, or dynamic epigenetic states associated with different profiles of coagulant activity. In this article we discuss some of the relevant lessons from the single cell "omics" and how they could unlock new potential mechanisms through which cancer driving oncogenic lesions may modulate CAT, with possible consequences for patient stratification, care, and outcomes.

Stratification of Risk Factors of Lung Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism and Determining the Critical Point for Preemptive Intervention: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis

Background

Several biomarkers or risk factors have been identified and several prediction models exist. The major limitations inherent in these models include cost-ineffectiveness and lack of systematic stratification of risk factors resulting in the inclusion of clinically insignificant biomarkers in the models. This review aimed to systematically stratify the risk factors of lung cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) and determine the critical point for preemptive intervention.

Methods

This systematic review was structured as per the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Academic Search Complete, and PsycINFO from the onset to June 2022. We included studies that reported the risk factors of lung cancer-associated VTE and corresponding risk estimates, irrespective of treatment status but studies were excluded if patients were on anti-VTE medications. We employed random effects models of meta-analysis and computed risk stability index and risk weight (Rw) to achieve the review objectives. The review protocol is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022336476).

Results

The clinically significant risk factors of VTE in lung cancer patients were D-dimer (odds ratio [OR] = 5.510, 95% CI = 2.6-11.7; Rw = 5.0), albumin (OR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.0-4.8; Rw = 1.79), leukocyte (OR = 2.48, 95% CI = 1.9-3.2; Rw = 1.77), histological type (OR = 1.69 , 95% CI = 1.2-2.4; Rw = 1.3), age (OR = 1.56; Rw = 0.99), and hemoglobin (OR = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.3-2.6; Rw = 0.92). Based on the distribution of Rw across risk factors, the critical point (upper third of the upper quartile class) was 4.5 and may mark the point at which preemptive intervention should be commenced.

Conclusions

Targeted screening for VTE in lung cancer patients could be patient-specific and should be based on a combination of the most significant risk factors required to meet the critical point, provided that such a combination is affordable as illustrated in the ALBAH model.

Registration

The review protocol is registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42022336476).

The Role of EGFR Amplification in Deep Venous Thrombosis Occurrence in IDH Wild-Type Glioblastoma

Introduction: Glioblastoma (GBM) patients have a 20-30 incidence of venous thromboembolic events. EGFR is a widely used prognostic marker for many cancers. Recent lung cancer studies have described relationships between EGFR amplification and an increased incidence of thromboembolic complications. We aim to explore this relationship in glioblastoma patients. Methods: Two hundred ninety-three consecutive patients with IDH wild-type GBM were included in the analysis. The amplification status of EGFR was measured using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Centromere 7 (CEP7) expression was recorded to calculate the EGFR-to-CEP7 ratio. All data were collected retrospectively through chart review. Molecular data were obtained through the surgical pathology report at the time of biopsy. Results: There were 112 subjects who were EGFR-amplified (38.2%) and 181 who were non-amplified (61.8%). EGFR amplification status was not significantly correlated with VTE risk overall (p = 0.2001). There was no statistically significant association between VTE and EGFR status after controlling for Bevacizumab therapy (p = 0.1626). EGFR non-amplified status was associated with an increased VTE risk in subjects greater than 60 years of age (p = 0.048). Conclusions: There was no significant difference in occurrence of VTE in patients with glioblastoma, regardless of EGFR amplification status. Patients older than 60 years of age with EGFR amplification experienced a lower rate of VTE, contrary to some reports on non-small-cell lung cancer linking EGFR amplification to VTE risk.

Application of Machine Learning to the Prediction of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common and impactful complication of cancer. Several clinical prediction rules have been devised to estimate the risk of a thrombotic event in this patient population, however they are associated with limitations. We aimed to develop a predictive model of cancer-associated VTE using machine learning as a means to better integrate all available data, improve prediction accuracy and allow applicability regardless of timing for systemic therapy administration. A retrospective cohort was used to fit and validate the models, consisting of adult patients who had next generation sequencing performed on their solid tumor for the years 2014 to 2019. A deep learning survival model limited to demographic, cancer-specific, laboratory and pharmacological predictors was selected based on results from training data for 23,800 individuals and was evaluated on an internal validation set including 5,951 individuals, yielding a time-dependent concordance index of 0.72 (95% CI = 0.70-0.74) for the first 6 months of observation. Adapted models also performed well overall compared to the Khorana Score (KS) in two external cohorts of individuals starting systemic therapy; in an external validation set of 1,250 patients, the C-index was 0.71 (95% CI = 0.65-0.77) for the deep learning model vs 0.66 (95% CI = 0.59-0.72) for the KS and in a smaller external cohort of 358 patients the C-index was 0.59 (95% CI = 0.50-0.69) for the deep learning model vs 0.56 (95% CI = 0.48-0.64) for the KS. The proportions of patients accurately reclassified by the deep learning model were 25% and 26% respectively. In this large cohort of patients with a broad range of solid malignancies and at different phases of systemic therapy, the use of deep learning resulted in improved accuracy for VTE incidence predictions. Additional studies are needed to further assess the validity of this model.

Tumor Genomic Profile Is Associated With Arterial Thromboembolism Risk in Patients With Solid Cancer

Background

Patients with cancer have an increased risk for arterial thromboembolism (ATE). Scant data exist about the impact of cancer-specific genomic alterations on the risk for ATE.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to determine whether individual solid tumor somatic genomic alterations influence the incidence of ATE.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using tumor genetic alteration data from adults with solid cancers who underwent Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets testing between 2014 and 2016. The primary outcome, ATE, was defined as myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, ischemic stroke, peripheral arterial occlusion, or limb revascularization and identified through systematic electronic medical record assessments. Patients were followed from date of tissue-matched blood control accession to first ATE event or death, for up to 1 year. Cause-specific Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine HRs of ATE for individual genes adjusted for pertinent clinical covariates.

Results

Among 11,871 eligible patients, 74% had metastatic disease, and there were 160 ATE events. A significantly increased risk for ATE independent of tumor type was noted for the KRAS oncogene (HR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.34-2.94; multiplicity-adjusted P = 0.015) and the STK11 tumor suppressor gene (HR: 2.51; 95% CI: 1.44-4.38; multiplicity-adjusted P = 0.015).

Conclusions

In a large genomic tumor-profiling registry of patients with solid cancers, alterations in KRAS and STK11 were associated with an increased risk for ATE independent of cancer type. Further investigation is needed to elucidate the mechanism by which these mutations contribute to ATE in this high-risk population.

Could PD-L1 positivity be associated with venous thrombosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer?

The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is increased in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and defining at-risk patients is important. Thus, we aimed to assess the association between programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and VTE [pulmonary embolism (PE), deep venous thrombosis (DVT)] in NSCLC. In this retrospective, observational multicentre study, 369 patients with NSCLC who had PD-L1 immunohistochemistry based on biopsies taken between January 2017 and December 2019, were divided as PD-L1-positive (n = 181) and -negative (n = 188) groups, and low-positive (n = 99) and high-positive (n = 82) PD-L1 groups. Among all population, 12.5% of them developed a VTE during a median follow-up of 474 days. The rates of DVT, PE, and PE + DVT were 5.7%, 6% and 0.8%, respectively. VTE (15.5% vs. 9.5%) and DVT (3.8% vs. 7.4%) were similar between two groups, while PE was significantly higher in PD‑L1-positive group than those in PD-L1-negative group (11.1% vs 1%, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between low- and high-positive groups in terms of VTE (14.1% vs. 17%), PE (12.1% vs. 9.8%), and DVT (2% vs. 6.1%). In the multivariate analysis, multiple metastases (Hazard ratio [HR] 4.02; 95% confidence interval [Cl] 1.18-13.63; p = 0.07) and PD-L1 positivity was associated with an increased PE risk (HR 8.39; 95% Cl 2.07-34.07; p = 0.003). In conclusion, PD-L1 positivity may be of important role in predicting the increased risk of PE in patients with NSCLC and thereby may be used to define patients likely to benefit from thromboprophylaxis.

Estimating Venous Thromboembolism Risk in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Inpatients: Validation of Existing Risk Scores and Development of New Risk Scores

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients are predisposed to venous thromboembolism (VTE). This study aimed to (1) evaluate the efficacy of 4 existing cancer-specific VTE models in predicting VTE incidence among hospitalized mCRC patients, and (2) examine the influence of incorporating mCRC molecular subtypes into these models. We conducted an evaluation of 4 cancer-specific VTE models, including Khorana, Vienna CATS, Protecht, and CONKO in a dataset involving 1392 mCRC patients. To evaluate the predictive performance, we utilized receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for both the original models and the modified models that incorporated microsatellite instability status or KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutations. Moreover, we computed the net reclassification improvement (NRI) to quantify the enhancements made to the modified VTE risk models. All models demonstrated a moderate area under the ROC curve (ROC-AUC) when predicting the occurrence of VTE: Khorana (0.550), Vienna CATS (0.671), Protecht (0.652), and CONKO (0.578). The incorporation of KRAS and BRAF mutations significantly improved the ROC-AUC of all 4 existing models (modified Khorana: 0.796, modified Vienna CATS: 0.832, modified Protecht: 0.834, and modified CONKO: 0.809). After dichotomizing the risk using a threshold of 3 points and comparing them with the original models, NRI values for the 4 modified models were 0.97, 0.95, 1.11, and 0.98, respectively. All 4 cancer-specific VTE models exhibit moderate performance when identifying mCRC patients at high risk of VTE. Incorporating KRAS and BRAF mutations may enhance the prediction of VTE in hospitalized mCRC patients.

Therapeutic Strategies Focused on Cancer-Associated Hypercoagulation for Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma

Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is associated with chemotherapy resistance and poor prognosis, especially in advanced cases. Although comprehensive genomic analyses have clarified the significance of genomic alterations such as ARID1A and PIK3CA mutations in OCCC, therapeutic strategies based on genomic alterations have not been confirmed. On the other hand, OCCC is clinically characterized by a high incidence of thromboembolism. Moreover, OCCC specifically shows high expression of tissue factor and interleukin-6, which play a critical role in cancer-associated hypercoagulation and may be induced by OCCC-specific genetic alterations or the endometriosis-related tumor microenvironment. In this review, we focused on the association between cancer-associated hypercoagulation and molecular biology in OCCC. Moreover, we reviewed the effectiveness of candidate drugs targeting hypercoagulation, such as tissue factor- or interleukin-6-targeting drugs, anti-inflammatory drugs, anti-hypoxia signaling drugs, anticoagulants, and combined immunotherapy with these drugs for OCCC. This review is expected to contribute to novel basic research and clinical trials for the prevention, early detection, and treatment of OCCC focused on hypercoagulation.

Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism

Cancer-associated thrombosis (including venous thromboembolism (VTE) and arterial events) is highly consequential for patients with cancer and is associated with worsened survival. Despite substantial improvements in cancer treatment, the risk of VTE has increased in recent years; VTE rates additionally depend on the type of cancer (with pancreas, stomach and primary brain tumours having the highest risk) as well as on individual patient's and cancer treatment factors. Multiple cancer-specific mechanisms of VTE have been identified and can be classified as mechanisms in which the tumour expresses proteins that alter host systems, such as levels of platelets and leukocytes, and in which the tumour expresses procoagulant proteins released into the circulation that directly activate the coagulation cascade or platelets, such as tissue factor and podoplanin, respectively. As signs and symptoms of VTE may be non-specific, diagnosis requires clinical assessment, evaluation of pre-test probability, and objective diagnostic testing with ultrasonography or CT. Risk assessment tools have been validated to identify patients at risk of VTE. Primary prevention of VTE (thromboprophylaxis) has long been recommended in the inpatient and post-surgical settings, and is now an option in the outpatient setting for individuals with high-risk cancer. Anticoagulant therapy is the cornerstone of therapy, with low molecular weight heparin or newer options such as direct oral anticoagulants. Personalized treatment incorporating risk of bleeding and patient preferences is essential, especially as a diagnosis of VTE is often considered by patients even more distressing than their cancer diagnosis, and can severely affect the quality of life. Future research should focus on current knowledge gaps including optimizing risk assessment tools, biomarker discovery, next-generation anticoagulant development and implementation science.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Treatment of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Latin American Perspective

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. On the basis of results from randomized controlled trials, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are now recommended for the treatment of cancer-associated VTE. The decision to use a DOAC requires consideration of bleeding risk, particularly in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies, the cost-benefit and convenience of oral therapy, and patient preference. While efficacy with apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban versus dalteparin has been consistent in the treatment of cancer-associated VTE, heterogeneity is evident with respect to major GI bleeding, with an increased risk with edoxaban and rivaroxaban but not apixaban. Although cost and accessibility vary in different countries of Latin America, DOACs should be considered for the long-term treatment of cancer-associated VTE in all patients who are likely to benefit. Apixaban may be the preferred DOAC in patients with GI malignancies and LMWH may be preferred for patients with upper or unresected lower GI tumors. Vitamin K antagonists should only be used for anticoagulation when DOACs and low molecular weight heparin are inaccessible or unsuitable.

Advances in the Prediction and Risk Assessment of Lung Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism

According to the most recent data from the National Cancer Center, venous thromboembolism (VTE) has unsurprisingly become one of the most common complications in lung cancer. VTE not only interferes with the equilibrium of the clotting system but it also affects tumor progression and prognosis. For the identification of high-risk patients, many clinical risk assessment models have been developed and validated based on the risk factors found in previous studies. In this review, we will summarize advances in prediction and risk assessment of VTE, with a focus on early diagnosis and therapy, reduction of mortality, and the burden of medical costs in lung cancer patients.

Anticoagulation therapy promotes the tumor immune-microenvironment and potentiates the efficacy of immunotherapy by alleviating hypoxia

Purpose

Here, this study verifies that cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) accelerates hypoxia, which is detrimental to the tumor immune microenvironment by limiting tumor perfusion. Therefore, we designed an oral anticoagulant therapy to improve the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and potentiate the efficacy of immunotherapy by alleviating tumor hypoxia.

Experimental design

A novel oral anticoagulant (STP3725) was developed to consistently prevent CAT formation. Tumor perfusion and hypoxia were analyzed with or without treating STP3725 in wild-type and P selectin knockout mice. Immunosuppressive cytokines and cells were analyzed to evaluate the alteration of the tumor microenvironment. Effector lymphocyte infiltration in tumor tissue was assessed by congenic CD45.1 mouse lymphocyte transfer model with or without anticoagulant therapy. Finally, various tumor models including K-Ras mutant spontaneous cancer model were employed to validate the role of the anticoagulation therapy in enhancing the efficacy of immunotherapy.

Results

CAT was demonstrated to be one of the perfusion barriers, which fosters immunosuppressive microenvironment by accelerating tumor hypoxia. Consistent treatment of oral anticoagulation therapy was proved to promote tumor immunity by alleviating hypoxia. Furthermore, this resulted in decrease of both hypoxia-related immunosuppressive cytokines and myeloid-derived suppressor cells while improving the spatial distribution of effector lymphocytes and their activity. The anticancer efficacy of αPD-1 antibody was potentiated by co-treatment with STP3725, also confirmed in various tumor models including the K-Ras mutant mouse model, which is highly thrombotic.

Conclusions

Collectively, these findings establish a rationale for a new and translational combination strategy of oral anticoagulation therapy with immunotherapy, especially for treating highly thrombotic cancers. The combination therapy of anticoagulants with immunotherapies can lead to substantial improvements of current approaches in the clinic.

New prophylaxis strategies to reduce the risk of thromboembolism in cancer

INTRODUCTION

: Patients with cancer are at risk of thrombotic events, mainly deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism. The thrombosis risk is generally 4-6 times higher than in a healthy population and depends on factors related to patient characteristics, tumor factors, and treatment-related factors. The decision-making for prophylactic anticoagulation is individualized according to the relative risks and benefits. The VTE risk has been quantified using different assessment scores. In recent years, an effort has been made to establish "risk assessment models" specifically for patients undergoing chemotherapy.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews current data and ongoing research on predictive factors involved in cancer-related thrombosis and it is highlighted the currently suggested strategies for prophylaxis. Several trials that compared the two treatment options, direct factor Xa inhibitor or LMWH, with placebo and not each other are discussed. In this article, was analyzed the safety and efficacy features that led several international organizations such as ASCO, NCCN, and others, to issue guidelines for the prophylaxis and treatment of patients at high risk of thrombosis by using LMWH, fondaparinux and DOACs.

EXPERT OPINION

ASCO, NCCN, and other international organizations recommend thromboprophylaxis in high risk patients. However, further investigation is needed to define better biomarkers for more accurate identification of cancer patients that will benefit from anticoagulant treatment.

Genetic and epigenetic regulation of cancer coagulome - lessons from heterogeneity of cancer cell populations

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a morbid, potentially life threatening and biologically impactful paraneoplastic state. At least in part, CAT is likely driven by cancer-specific mechanisms the nature of which is still poorly understood, hampering diagnostic, prophylactic and therapeutic efforts. It is increasingly appreciated that cancer-specific drivers of CAT include a constellation of oncogenic mutations and their superimposed epigenetic states that shape the transcriptome, phenotype and secretome of cancer cell populations, including the repertoire of genes impacting the vascular and coagulation systems. High-grade brain tumours, such as glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) represent a paradigm of locally initiated haemostatic abnormalities that propagate systemically, likely through circulating mediators, such as extracellular vesicles and soluble factors. Reciprocally, CAT impacts the biology of cancer cells and may drive tumour evolution. The constituent, oncogene-transformed cancer cell populations form complex ecosystems, the intricate architecture of which has been recently revealed by single cell sequencing technologies. Amidst this phenotypic heterogeneity, several alternative pathways of CAT may exist both between and within individual tumours and their subtypes, including GBM. Indeed, different contributions of cells expressing key coagulant mediators, such as tissue factor, or podoplanin, have been identified in GBM subtypes driven by oncogenic mutations in EGFR, IDH1 and other transforming genes. Thus, a better understanding of cellular sources of CAT, including dominant cancer cell phenotypes and their dynamic shifts, may help design more personalised approaches to thrombosis in cancer patients to improve outcomes.

Driver Genes Associated With the Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The association between driver genes and the incidence of thromboembolic events (TEs) in patients diagnosed with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) needs to be quantified to guide clinical management.

METHODS

We interrogated PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane library databases for terms related to venous thromboembolism (VTE) and arterial thromboembolism (ATE) in patients diagnosed with non-small-cell lung cancer harboring driver genes. This search was conducted for studies published between 1 January, 2000 and 31 December, 2020. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed to analyze the pooled incidence and odds ratios of VTE in patients with different driver genes.

RESULTS

Of the 2,742 citations identified, a total of 25 studies that included 21,156 patients met eligibility criteria. The overall pooled incidence of VTE in patients with driver genes was 23% (95% CI 18-29). Patients with ROS1 rearrangements had the highest incidence of VTE (37%, 95%CI 23-52). ALK rearrangements were associated with increased VTE risks (OR=2.08,95% CI 1.69-2.55), with the second highest incidence of VTE (27%, 95%CI 20-35). Both groups of patients with EGFR and KRAS mutations did not show a significantly increased risk for VTE (OR=1.33, 95% CI 0.75-2.34; OR=1.31, 95% CI 0.40-4.28).

CONCLUSIONS

ALK rearrangements were shown to be associated with increased VTE risks in patients diagnosed with non-small lung cancer, while there was no significant relation observed between VTE risks and EGFR or KRAS mutations in lung cancer patients.

Genomic profiling identifies somatic mutations predicting thromboembolic risk in patients with solid tumors

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) associated with cancer (CAT) is a well-described complication of cancer and a leading cause of death in patients with cancer. The purpose of this study was to assess potential associations of molecular signatures with CAT, including tumor-specific mutations and the presence of clonal hematopoiesis. We analyzed deep-coverage targeted DNA-sequencing data of >14 000 solid tumor samples using the Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets platform to identify somatic alterations associated with VTE. End point was defined as the first instance of cancer-associated pulmonary embolism and/or proximal/distal lower extremity deep vein thrombosis. Cause-specific Cox proportional hazards regression was used, adjusting for pertinent clinical covariates. Of 11 695 evaluable individuals, 72% had metastatic disease at time of analysis. Tumor-specific mutations in KRAS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.34; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09-1.64; adjusted P = .08), STK11 (HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.55-2.89; adjusted P < .001), KEAP1 (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.21-2.79; adjusted P = .07), CTNNB1 (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.15-2.60; adjusted P = .09), CDKN2B (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.13-1.85; adjusted P = .07), and MET (HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.15-2.92; adjusted P = .09) were associated with a significantly increased risk of CAT independent of tumor type. Mutations in SETD2 were associated with a decreased risk of CAT (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.16-0.79; adjusted P = .09). The presence of clonal hematopoiesis was not associated with an increased VTE rate. This is the first large-scale analysis to elucidate tumor-specific genomic events associated with CAT. Somatic tumor mutations of STK11, KRAS, CTNNB1, KEAP1, CDKN2B, and MET were associated with an increased risk of VTE in patients with solid tumors. Further analysis is needed to validate these findings and identify additional molecular signatures unique to individual tumor types.

High discrepancy in thrombotic events in non-small cell lung cancer patients with different genomic alterations

Background

Acute complications, such as venous thromboembolism (VTE), are common in patients with advanced severe lung cancers. However, current VTE risk scores cannot adequately identify high-risk patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The study proposed to elucidated the incidence of thromboembolism (TE) in patients with different oncogenic aberrations and the impact of these aberrations on the efficacy of targeted therapy in patients with NSCLC.

Methods

A systemic review was conducted in Web of Science, PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library to evaluate the incidence of TE in different molecular subtypes of NSCLC. Data from patients diagnosed of advanced NSCLC who harboring anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) or ROS proto-oncogene 1 receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1) rearrangements since 2016 to 2019 were also retrospectively collected. A meta-analysis with random-effects model, sensitivity analysis and publication bias were performed. The principal summary measure was incidence of thrombotic events in NSCLC patients. And the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy was compared between the two subgroups.

Results

A total of 5,767 cases from 20 studies were included in the analysis of the incidence of thrombosis in patients with different oncogenic alterations. The pooled analysis showed a higher risk of thrombosis in ROS1-fusion types (41%, 95% CI: 35-47%) and ALK-fusion types (30%, 95% CI: 24-37%) than in EGFR-mutation (12%, 95% CI: 8-17%), KRAS-mutation (25%, 95% CI: 13-50%), and wild-type (14%, 95% CI: 10-20%) cases. A high prevalence of thrombosis (ALK: 24.4%; ROS1: 32.6%) was observed in the Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital (SPH) cohort of 224 patients with ALK or ROS1 fusion. Furthermore, patients with embolism had significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) after TKI therapy than those without embolism, both in the ALK+ cohort (5.6 vs. 12.9 months, P<0.0001) and in the ROS1+ cohort (9.6 vs. 17.6 months, P=0.0481).

Conclusions

NSCLC patients with ALK/ROS1 rearrangements are more likely to develop thrombosis than patients with other oncogenic alterations. Thrombosis may also be associated with an inferior response and PFS after TKI therapy.

Cancer and thrombosis: new insights to an old problem

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication in patients with cancer and portends a poor prognosis. Our understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of VTE in cancer has advanced since Trousseau first described hypercoagulability in patients with malignancy and Virchow described his famous triad of thrombosis formation. Malignancy itself induces a thrombophilic state by increasing the risk of venous stasis, endothelial injury and an imbalance of pro and anti-thrombotic factors leading to a hypercoaguable state. Additional insults to this thrombotic balance are introduced by patient-specific, treatment related and tumor-specific factors. The importance of understanding the factors associated with increased thrombosis in cancer is paramount in order to adequately identify patients who will benefit from thromboprophylaxis.

Impact of Tumor Genomic Mutations on Thrombotic Risk in Cancer Patients

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common in patients with cancer and is an important contributor to morbidity and mortality in these patients. Early thromboprophylaxis initiated only in those cancer patients at highest risk for VTE would be optimal. Risk stratification scores incorporating tumor location, laboratory values and patient characteristics have attempted to identify those patients most likely to benefit from thromboprophylaxis but even well-validated scores are not able to reliably distinguish the highest-risk patients. Recognizing that tumor genetics affect the biology and behavior of malignancies, recent studies have explored the impact of specific molecular aberrations on the rate of VTE in cancer patients. The presence of certain molecular aberrations in a variety of different cancers, including lung, colon, brain and hematologic tumors, have been associated with an increased risk of VTE and arterial thrombotic events. This review examines the findings of these studies and discusses the implications of these findings on decisions relating to thromboprophylaxis use in the clinical setting. Ultimately, the integration of tumor molecular genomic information into clinical VTE risk stratification scores in cancer patients may prove to be a major advancement in the prevention of cancer-associated thrombosis.

The association between pulmonary embolism and the cancer-related genomic alterations in patients with NSCLC

To date, the association between the acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and the currently existing cancer-related genomic alterations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been understudied. We reviewed patients with a confirmed histopathological diagnosis of NSCLC who underwent computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and molecular tests including ALK, ROS1, EGFR, BRAF V600E as well as PD-L1 during the diagnosis of NSCLC, to explore the association between the genomic alterations and PE. The results showed that, for the patients with positive results of genomic alterations, the proportion of positive ALK (13.6%vs8.5%, P<0.001) and PD-L1 (24.7%vs19.9%, P = 0.001) in PE group were more than those in Non-PE group. The patients with positive ALK and PD-L1 had the most (19.0%) and second most (15.4%) incidence of PE among all the patients being studied. A multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that the positive ALK [1.685(1.065-2.215)(P<0.001)] and PD-L1[1.798(1.137-2.201)(P<0.001)] were correlated with the occurrence of PE. The positive results of ALK and PD-L1 genomic alterations may indicate an increased risk of pulmonary embolism in patients with NSCLC.

Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with colorectal cancer according to oncogenic status

BACKGROUND

There are conflicting data regarding the role of KRAS mutation on the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Moreover, the role of other biomarkers such as NRAS or BRAF has not been studied.

PURPOSE

To analyze the incidence of VTE in a cohort of patients with CRC based on KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF status.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients with unresectable locally advanced and metastatic CRC (mCRC) and known KRAS/NRAS/BRAF status, attended in the Medical Oncology Department of the Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (Madrid, Spain). The primary outcome was VTE defined as any venous thromboembolic event that occurred either 6 months before or at any time after the diagnosis of CRC. The biomarker status (KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF) and other predictors of thrombosis were collected.

RESULTS

One hundred and ninety-four patients were identified and included in the analysis. Forty-one patients (21.1%) experienced VTE. The incidence was 19.1% in RAS-mutated patients, 28.6% in BRAF-mutated patients and 21% in triple wild-type patients (p = NS). In multivariate analysis, ECOG ≥ 2 was the only independent predictor of VTE (OR 8.73; CI 95% 1.32-57.82; p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, biomarkers have not been associated with an increased risk of VTE in CRC patients. A high incidence of VTE in BRAF-mutated patients has been observed and should be explored in further studies.

The EGFR-rearranged adenocarcinoma is associated with a high rate of venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations patients with lung adenocarcinoma, to provide clinical basis for the perioperative prevention and treatment of VTE in patients with lung cancer.

METHODS

This study included patients with invasive lung adenocarcinoma confirmed by pathology from July 2016 to March 2018 after surgical pulmonectomy in Thoracic Surgery Department of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital. All enrolled patients were tested for relevant gene mutations. All patients were classified as adenocarcinoma subtypes by the 2011 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC), American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS). Patients were divided into the VTE group and the control group according to whether VTE occurred postoperatively. Baseline data, gene test results, operative data and tumor pathology data between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

According to the inclusion criteria, a total of 323 patients underwent lung cancer surgery were analyzed in this study, including 148 males and 175 females, aged from 25 to 82 years old. Postoperative VTE occurred in 33 patients, with an incidence of 10.2%. Compared the baseline data, there were significant differences in age and BMI between the two groups, but no significant differences in other indicators. Comparing the results of postoperative genetic tests, the cases of exon 18, 19, 20, 21, 30, 31 mutation, exon 18 and 20 mixed mutation and exon 20 and 21 mixed mutation were 5, 42, 6, 57, 1, 3, 1 and 1. The total EGFR mutation rate in the enrolled patients was 36.2% (117/323). Among them, the proportion of EGFR mutation in the VTE group was significantly higher than that in the non-VTE group (60.6% vs. 33.4%, P=0.002). Exon mutations in specific regions and mixed region of EGFR were not statistically significant between them; there was no statistical difference in the concomitant KRAS and ALK gene mutations between them. Comparing the pathological conditions, the proportion of acinar dominant lung adenocarcinoma in the VTE group was higher than that in the non-VTE group (57.6% vs. 30.7%, P=0.002); other histologic subtypes showed no statistical difference. The D-dimer difference before and 1 day after surgery, preoperative FEV1, surgical method, duration of surgery and blood loss were statistically significant differences between the two groups. The results of univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences between the VTE group and the control group in proportion of EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinoma, age, BMI, D-dimer difference before and 1 day after surgery, preoperative FEV1, surgical method, duration of surgery, blood loss and proportion of acinar dominant lung adenocarcinoma (P<0.05). However, VTE was not significantly correlated with gender, ALK or KRAS gene mutation and other factors. Multi-factor logistics regression analysis shows that Patients with EGFR gene mutation infiltrating lung adenocarcinoma, acinar dominant lung adenocarcinoma, FEV1 and difference of D-dimer (d1-pre) are independent risk factors for postoperative lung cancer complicated with VTE.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of VTE was 10.2% in patients with invasive lung adenocarcinoma without prophylactic anticoagulant therapy. EGFR gene mutation is an independent risk factor for postoperative VTE in lung cancer, and the incidence of VTE in adenocarcinoma with alveolar predominance is the highest. Other independent risk factors included the difference of D-dimer (d1-pre) and preoperative FEV1.

ROS1-rearranged Non-small-cell Lung Cancer is Associated With a High Rate of Venous Thromboembolism: Analysis From a Phase II, Prospective, Multicenter, Two-arms Trial (METROS)

BACKGROUND

Patients with cancer are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE), and 8% to 15% of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) experience a VTE event during the course of their disease. The incidence of VTE in molecularly defined NSCLC subgroups is still unclear. In this study, we investigated the incidence and the clinical correlates of VTE in patients with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC enrolled in the METROS trial (NCT02499614).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The METROS trial is a prospective phase II study designed to assess efficacy, safety, and tolerability of crizotinib in patients with pre-treated metastatic NSCLC ROS1 rearrangement (cohort A) or with MET amplification or MET exon 14 mutation (cohort B). Patients with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC enrolled within cohort A and the expansion cohort of the trial were included in the primary analysis.

RESULTS

Among 48 patients with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC enrolled in the METROS study, 20 (41.6%) of 48 had at least 1 VTE event. Among them, 7 (35%) of 20 patients had ≥ 2 VTE events. VTE events consisted of pulmonary embolism (46.4%), deep vein thrombosis (39.2%), renal vein thrombosis (7.1%), internal jugular thrombosis (3.5%), and peripheral inserted central catheter-related thrombosis (3.5%). VTE events occurred at disease progression in 35.7% of cases, at diagnosis in 32.1% of cases, and during chemotherapy or crizotinib in 17.8% and 14.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of VTE is 3- to 5-fold higher in patients harboring ROS1-rearrangment than previously observed for the general population with NSCLC. Larger studies are warranted to confirm our findings and determine whether the molecular profile of NSCLC should be incorporated into a risk-stratification tool and decision-making algorithm for VTE diagnosis and prophylaxis.

[Primary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients treated with antineoplastic agents]

Apart from myeloma, primary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in ambulatory cancer patients treated with chemotherapy is underused, despite its proven benefit for pancreatic cancer and to a lesser extent for lung cancer. This prophylaxis has been showed to be effective for myeloma, pancreas but in absolute numbers these cancers lead to a few venous thromboembolic events. Up to date, VTE risk scores cannot be used as a discriminatory criterion to select a high-risk population that could really benefit from this prevention. VTE depends in part on oncogenic mutations of tumor cells that result in an imbalance between activation and inhibition pathways that are involved in venous thrombus formation. So, stratification of risk of VTE in cancer patients could be considered from a clinical and molecular point of view and result in a tailored prophylaxis. This "personalized medicine" that is currently used for the anti-tumor treatment of many cancers and hematological malignancies, could lead to a more effective prophylaxis of VTE in cancer patients.

Cancer-associated thrombosis: the when, how and why

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a condition in which relevance has been increasingly recognised both for physicians that deal with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and for oncologists. It is currently estimated that the annual incidence of VTE in patients with cancer is 0.5% compared to 0.1% in the general population. Active cancer accounts for 20% of the overall incidence of VTE. Of note, VTE is the second most prevalent cause of death in cancer, second only to the progression of the disease, and cancer is the most prevalent cause of deaths in VTE patients. Nevertheless, CAT presents several peculiarities that distinguish it from other VTE, both in pathophysiology mechanisms, risk factors and especially in treatment, which need to be considered. CAT data will be reviewed in this review.

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) presents peculiar features (risk factors and pathophysiology) that distinguish it from common VTE cases. Treatment of CAT requires a different approach, since the patients are more prone to recurrence and bleeding.http://ow.ly/j1Lu30nYmd5

Single cell coagulomes as constituents of the oncogene-driven coagulant phenotype in brain tumours

Molecular profiling of human cancers revealed a startling diversity in disease-causing mechanisms superseding histological and anatomical commonalities. The emerging molecular subtypes and disease entities are often driven by distinct oncogenic pathways and their effectors, including those acting extracellularly on the vascular and coagulation systems. Indeed, several oncogenic mutations such as those affecting protein-coding genes (RAS, EGFR, PTEN, TP53) and non-coding RNA (microRNA) regulate multiple effectors of the coagulation system (coagulome), including tissue factor, protease activated receptors, clotting factors, mediators of platelet function and fibrinolysis. This is exemplified by differential coagulome profiles in the molecular subtypes of glioblastoma, medulloblastoma and other human tumours. There is mounting clinical evidence that the mutational status of cancer driver genes such as KRAS or IDH1 may influence the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with colorectal, lung or brain cancers. Notably, single cell sequencing in glioblastoma revealed a remarkable intra-tumoural heterogeneity of cancer cell populations with regard to their individual coagulomes, suggesting a combinatorial and dynamic nature of the global pro-thrombotic phenotype. We suggest that the cellular complexity of specific cancers may define their mechanisms of interactions with the coagulation system, and the risks of thrombosis. Thus, more biologically- based, disease-specific and personalized approaches may be needed to diagnose and manage cancer-related thrombosis.

Cancer-associated thrombosis: The search for the holy grail continues

Cancer patients have an increased risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE), a condition that is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Although risk assessment tools have been developed, it is still very challenging to predict which cancer patients will suffer from VTE. The scope of this review is to summarize and discuss studies focusing on the link between genetic alterations and risk of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). Thus far, classical risk factors that contribute to VTE have been tried as risk factors of CAT, with low success. In support, hypercoagulant plasma profiles in patients with CAT differ from those with only VTE, indicating other risk factors that contribute to VTE in cancer. As germline mutations do not significantly contribute to elevated risk of VTE, somatic mutations in tumors may significantly associate with and contribute to CAT. As it is very time-consuming to investigate each and every mutation, an unbiased approach is warranted. In this light we discuss our own recent unbiased proof-of-principle study using RNA sequencing in isolated colorectal cancer cells. Our work has uncovered candidate genes that associate with VTE in colorectal cancer, and these gene profiles associated with VTE more significantly than classical parameters such as platelet counts, D-dimer, and P-selectin levels. Genes associated with VTE could be linked to pathways being involved in coagulation, inflammation and methionine degradation. We conclude that tumor cell-specific gene expression profiles and/or mutational status has superior potential as predictors of VTE in cancer patients.

Association between oncogenic status and risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Preclinical data suggest that oncogene (EGFR and KRAS) events regulate tumor procoagulant activity. However, few studies have prospectively investigated the clinical relevance between the presence of EGFR or KRAS mutations and occurrence of venous thromboembolism(VTE) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

A total of 605 Chinese patients with newly diagnosed NSCLC were included and were followed for a maximum period of 4.5 years. EGFR and KRAS mutations were determined by amplification refractory mutation system polymerase chain reaction method at inclusion. The main outcome was objectively confirmed VTE.

Results

Of the 605 patients, 40.3% (244) had EGFR mutations and 10.2% (62) of patients had KRAS mutations. In multivariable analysis including age, sex, tumor histology, tumor stage, performance status, EGFR and KRAS status, EGFR wild-type (sub-distribution hazard ratio 1.81, 95% confidence interval 1.07–3.07) were associated with the increased risk of VTE. In competing risk analysis, the probability of developing VTE was 8.3% in those with and 13.2% in those without EGFR mutations after 1 year; after 2 years, the corresponding risks were 9.7 and 15.5% (Gray test P = 0.047).

Conclusions

EGFR mutations have a negative association with the risk of VTE in Chinese patients with NSCLC.

Risk factors and prognosis value of venous thromboembolism in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a case-control study

Background

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the well-known complication of cancer, especially among lung cancer patients. The objective of this study is to identify the incidence, risk factors and prognosis of VTE in the patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in an advanced or metastatic stage (stage III or IV). We hypothesized that NSCLC patients associated with VTE may lead to poor prognosis.

Methods

From 2012 to 2015, we retrospectively investigated 1,560 patients diagnosed with lung cancer in stage III or IV. Each VTE patient was matched with three control patients according to gender, age, pathology, clinical stage and the diagnosed time. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used in the study.

Results

Among the 1,560 patients in our study, 32 (2.0%) developed VTE in locally advanced or metastatic stage lung cancer. Weight loss, serous effusion, the absence of the EGFR mutation, poor performance status (PS), hypoalbuminemia, hyponatremia, long prothrombin time (PT), and elevated levels of C-reaction-protein (CRP) and D-dimer were found to be associated with an increased risk of VTE by univariate analyses. The multivariate analyses revealed that weight loss, poor PS, increased CRP and long PT were significantly related to VTE. Overall survival (OS) from diagnosis was significantly shorter in patients with VTE (medians 14.2 vs. 24.4 months; P<0.001).

Conclusions

The incidence of VTE was high among advanced NSCLC patients, particularly for those with weight loss, poor PS, increased CRP and long PT. Moreover, the patients with VTE complications may have a poorer prognosis.

Mutant IDH1 and thrombosis in gliomas

Mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) is common in gliomas, and produces D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2-HG). The full effects of IDH1 mutations on glioma biology and tumor microenvironment are unknown. We analyzed a discovery cohort of 169 World Health Organization (WHO) grade II-IV gliomas, followed by a validation cohort of 148 cases, for IDH1 mutations, intratumoral microthrombi, and venous thromboemboli (VTE). 430 gliomas from The Cancer Genome Atlas were analyzed for mRNAs associated with coagulation, and 95 gliomas in a tissue microarray were assessed for tissue factor (TF) protein. In vitro and in vivo assays evaluated platelet aggregation and clotting time in the presence of mutant IDH1 or D-2-HG. VTE occurred in 26-30 % of patients with wild-type IDH1 gliomas, but not in patients with mutant IDH1 gliomas (0 %). IDH1 mutation status was the most powerful predictive marker for VTE, independent of variables such as GBM diagnosis and prolonged hospital stay. Microthrombi were far less common within mutant IDH1 gliomas regardless of WHO grade (85-90 % in wild-type versus 2-6 % in mutant), and were an independent predictor of IDH1 wild-type status. Among all 35 coagulation-associated genes, F3 mRNA, encoding TF, showed the strongest inverse relationship with IDH1 mutations. Mutant IDH1 gliomas had F3 gene promoter hypermethylation, with lower TF protein expression. D-2-HG rapidly inhibited platelet aggregation and blood clotting via a novel calcium-dependent, methylation-independent mechanism. Mutant IDH1 glioma engraftment in mice significantly prolonged bleeding time. Our data suggest that mutant IDH1 has potent antithrombotic activity within gliomas and throughout the peripheral circulation. These findings have implications for the pathologic evaluation of gliomas, the effect of altered isocitrate metabolism on tumor microenvironment, and risk assessment of glioma patients for VTE.

A systematic review of biomarkers for the prediction of thromboembolism in lung cancer - Results, practical issues and proposed strategies for future risk prediction models

INTRODUCTION

This review aimed to identify candidate biomarkers for the prediction of thromboembolism (TE) in lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Systematic review of publications indexed in PubMed or EMBASE databases in the past 5years (01/05/2011-01/05/2016) which evaluated baseline and/or longitudinal biomarker measurements as a predictor of subsequent TE (venous and arterial) in lung cancer patients.

RESULTS

Of 1105 studies identified, 18 fulfilled predefined inclusion criteria: 6 prospective and 12 retrospective. The 18 studies included 11,262 patients and 36 unique biomarkers. The combined TE rate was 7% (741/10,854), increasing to 11% (294/2612) within prospective studies. All biomarker measurements were baseline only, with no longitudinal assessment reported. The most frequently investigated biomarkers were tumour-related driver mutations, D-dimer, haemoglobin, white cell, and platelet count; as well as biomarker combinations previously used in risk prediction models, such as Khorana risk score. Biomarker thresholds rather than continuous variable analyses were generally applied, however thresholds were not consistent across studies. D-dimer and epidermal growth factor receptor mutation were the strongest and most reproducible predictors of TE.

CONCLUSION

An important limitation is the lack of prospective data across specific subpopulations of cancer, with correlative, and preferably longitudinal, biomarker assessments. This would provide insight into the pathophysiology, allow patient profiling, and the development of personalised decision-making tools that can be used real-time and throughout the course of the patients' journey, for targeted, risk-adaptive preventative strategies.