Human seminal plasma allergy--a rare cause of recurrent anaphylaxis

Allergies to sperm are very uncommon. A 23-year old woman with atopic dermatitis complained of three attacks of angioedema, urticaria, wheezing and weakness. When questioned about factors causing exercise-induced anaphylaxis, the patient reported having had sexual intercourse with the same partner one hour before each event. When using condoms, no symptoms occurred. Human seminal plasma allergy was confirmed by positive skin testing with the partner's sperm. Specific IgE-antibodies against human seminal plasma were not found. The patient received an emergency kit for anaphylaxis.

[Role of Helicobacter and lamblia infections in the diagnostics and treatment of chronic hives]

Chronic recurrent urticaria is a pluricausal disease observed not only by allergologists but also by gastroenterologists and general practitioners in their practice. Two concomitant pathological processes--urticaria and chronic inflammatory diseases of the gastrointestinal tract, especially in cases of helminthic infections--are examined in full measure. This article also describes the concomitant effect of Helicobacter pylori and G. lamblia infections as the most frequent factor inducing the development of chronic urticaria. These particular features of its etiology served as the basis for introducing up-to-date high-technology diagnostics methods and developing corresponding approaches to the treatment of patients suffering from this disease.

Efficacy of fexofenadine versus desloratadine in suppressing histamine-induced wheal and flare

To date, no published articles exist comparing the H1-receptor antagonist activities of fexofenadine and desloratadine using the histamine-induced skin wheal-and-flare model. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of fexofenadine versus desloratadine in suppressing histamine-induced skin flares and wheals in adults and adolescents. This was a two-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, complete-crossover study. Subjects were administered either single-dose fexofenadine HCl, 180 mg; desloratadine, 5 mg; or placebo and their response to skin-prick testing with histamine and diluent was recorded at predetermined time intervals. The primary end point was change in size of histamine-induced summation skin flares. Secondary end points included change in skin wheal summation measurements, onset, duration, maximum percent suppression, and time to maximum suppression of flares and wheals. Fexofenadine suppressed skin flares significantly more than desloratadine from 2 to 6 hours, and wheals from 2 to 4 hours, 6 to 9 hours, and 12 hours posttreatment. In addition, fexofenadine suppressed flares more than placebo at all time points from 2 to 24 hours and wheals more than placebo at all time points from 2 to 12 hours posttreatment. Desloratadine suppressed flares significantly more than placebo from 6 to 10 hours and at 12 and 24 hours but suppressed wheals significantly versus placebo only at 10 hours. Fexofenadine had a faster onset of flare suppression than desloratadine (1 hour versus 5 hours) and an equally rapid onset of wheal suppression. Fexofenadine HCl, 180 mg, was superior to desloratadine, 5 mg, in histamine-induced wheal-and-flare suppression, suggesting increased in vivo H1-receptor antagonist potency of fexofenadine versus desloratadine.

Anakinra prevents symptoms of familial cold autoinflammatory syndrome and Raynaud's disease

OBJECTIVE

Familial cold autoinflammatory syndrome (FCAS) is a rare, hereditary disorder characterized by cold-induced inflammation. We describe the successful longterm treatment of a patient with FCAS with anakinra, an interleukin 1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra). The remarkable response of FCAS and associated Raynaud's disease in this patient suggests that IL-1 is an important mediator of these inflammatory diseases. Our report supports increasing evidence that anakinra plays an important role in the treatment of select chronic inflammatory diseases.

The effect of montelukast (10mg daily) and loratadine (10mg daily) on wheal, flare and itching reactions in skin prick tests

Antileukotriene agents are widely used for the treatment of allergic conditions including bronchial asthma and allergic rhinitis. The influence of montelukast on skin reactivity has not been clearly evaluated. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of montelukast on wheal, flare and itching in skin prick tests (SPTs).

METHODS

Fifteen atopic patients (5 women and 10 men) with average age 28.04 (SD+/-8.24) were tested with histamine, codeine, negative control solution and allergen extract (grasses). Montelukast (10mg), loratadine (10mg) or placebo were given to the volunteers for 5 days in a double-blind manner, followed by SPT, with 14 days of wash-out period.

RESULTS

There was no differences in wheal, flare and itching (p=0.205; 0.086 and 0.069, respectively, Wilcoxon rank-sum test) between SPT performed after placebo and wash-out period. The analysis revealed a statistically significant suppression of wheal and flare by loratadine (p<0.05 for all tested solutions). Pre-treatment with montelukast did not influence wheal size (p=0.099, 0.21, 0.066 for histamine, codeine and allergens, respectively), but significantly reduced flare (p=0.005; 0.003; 0.02 for histamine, codeine and allergens, respectively). We found a significant suppression of itching produced by montelukast (p=0.02) and loratadine (p=0.03) as compared to placebo (p=0.068 vs. wash out).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show a tendency to suppressive effect of montelukast on flare and itching but not on wheal which is basic for SPT interpretation. We conclude that found suppression have little impact on clinical effectiveness of SPT as a diagnostic tool.

Occupational Contact Urticaria

Among contact dermatosis, irritant contact dermatitis and allergic eczema are by far the most frequent. Nevertheless, concerning occupational dermatosis, contact urticaria should be not neglected. Allergy to natural rubber latex is well-known; however, many other substances found in catering jobs and in jobs involving close contact with animals or vegetables can cause allergies. Discrete forms are not rare and should be remembered during questioning of the patient, as well as during a clinical examination. Accordingly, a physician should perform the appropriate cutaneous tests--particularly prick tests--and the relevance of these tests then needs to be assessed.

Histamine H1 receptor occupancy and pharmacodynamics of second generation H1-antihistamines

The predictive efficacy of drugs in humans is frequently estimated from both a high affinity for their receptor as measured in vitro and a long plasmatic half-life. This is grossly misleading since one key parameter is missing: drug concentration at the receptor site in vivo. As a case study we compared the efficacies of three H(1) antihistamines in inhibiting histamine-induced wheal and flare in humans at two different time points with the above mentioned parameters. It is concluded that estimating in vivo receptor occupancy, which takes into account both the affinity of the drug for the receptor and its free plasma concentration, is a far better predictor for human pharmacodynamics and hence antihistamine potency, than considering in vitro affinity and plasmatic half-life only.

Comparative effects of fexofenadine and montelukast on allergen-induced wheal and flare

Comparisons of the efficacy, onset and duration of action of fexofenadine and montelukast are limited. This study evaluated the pharmacodynamic properties of these agents in an allergen-induced wheal-and-flare model. This randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study was composed of three treatment periods and two visits on consecutive days for each period, with each period separated by a 14-day (+/-4) washout. At each treatment visit, subjects received a predose allergen skin-prick test followed by either a single dose of fexofenadine HCl 180 mg, montelukast sodium 10 mg, or placebo. Allergen skin-prick testing was performed at 20, 40, and 60 minutes, then hourly through 12 hours and at 23 hours and 24 hours postdose. Adults (n = 48) with positive skin-prick tests were included in the analysis. Significant flare inhibition occurred from 40 minutes through 24 hours postdose for fexofenadine versus placebo (p < 0.05), whereas montelukast did not reach statistical significance for flare inhibition at any time point compared with placebo. Significant wheal inhibition occurred from 60 minutes through 24 hours postdose for fexofenadine versus placebo (p = 0.0012); montelukast did not significantly suppress wheal versus placebo at any time point. Fexofenadine had greater suppression than montelukast for both wheal and flare from 40 minutes through 24 hours (p < .05). Maximum suppression of flare and wheal reached 79.0 and 72.3% for fexofenadine, and 7.3 and 9.6% for montelukast. Fexofenadine suppressed the allergen-induced wheal-and-flare response to a significantly greater extent, and had a significantly faster onset of action, compared with montelukast.

Prevention of cold-associated acute inflammation in familial cold autoinflammatory syndrome by interleukin-1 receptor antagonist

BACKGROUND

Familial cold autoinflammatory syndrome (FCAS) is an autosomal dominant disorder characterised by recurrent episodes of rash, arthralgia, and fever after cold exposure. The genetic basis of this disease has been elucidated. Cryopyrin, the protein that is altered in FCAS, is one of the adaptor proteins that activate caspase 1, resulting in release of interleukin 1.

METHODS

An experimental cold challenge protocol was developed to study the acute inflammatory mechanisms occurring after a general cold exposure in FCAS patients and to investigate the effects of pretreatment with an antagonist of interleukin 1 receptor (IL-1Ra). ELISA, real-time PCR, and immunohistochemistry were used to measure cytokine responses.

FINDINGS

After cold challenge, untreated patients with FCAS developed rash, fever, and arthralgias within 1-4 h. Significant increases in serum concentrations of interleukin 6 and white-blood-cell counts were seen 4-8 h after cold challenge. Serum concentrations of interleukin 1 and cytokine mRNA in peripheral-blood leucocytes were not raised, but amounts of interleukin 1 protein and mRNA were high in affected skin. IL-1Ra administered before cold challenge blocked symptoms and increases in white-blood-cell counts and serum interleukin 6.

INTERPRETATION

The ability of IL-1Ra to prevent the clinical features and haematological and biochemical changes in patients with FCAS indicates a central role for interleukin 1beta in this disorder. Involvement of cryopyrin in activation of caspase 1 and NF-kappaB signalling suggests that it might have a role in many chronic inflammatory diseases.

RELEVANCE TO PRACTICE

These findings support a new therapy for a disorder with no previously known acceptable treatment. They also offer insights into the role of interleukin 1beta in more common inflammatory diseases.

Advances in the treatment of chronic urticaria

There have been a number of exciting developments in the treatment of allergic diseases in recent years, but the development of new treatments for urticaria has lagged behind. The standard treatment for chronic urticaria (CU) involves the use of H1 antagonists. A number of small but promising studies have found potential benefit with medications that are used less often. This article reviews the established therapies for CU and the experimental evidence for the use of nonstandard and relatively unknown therapies. The potential usefulness of some of the new allergy medications for the treatment of CU also is discussed.

Readministration of high-dose methotrexate in a patient with suspected immediate hypersensitivity and T-cell acute lymphoblastic lymphoma

There is a paucity of literature addressing the management of methotrexate (MTX) hypersensitivity. We developed a high-dose MTX readministration protocol based on a modified, prolonged carboplatin desensitization protocol. Over 1.5 hours, 1/1000 of the total intravenous dose was administered followed by 1/100 over 1.5 hours, 1/10 over 6 hours, and the rest of the full dose over 24 hours. MTX readministration was successfully tolerated on three occasions in a 17-year-old male patient with T-cell acute lymphoblastic lymphoma and a history of urticarial reactions to MTX. This high-dose MTX readministration protocol may be valuable for treating patients with T-cell acute lymphoblastic lymphoma and suspected immediate MTX hypersensitivity.

Coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic valve replacement with cold cardioplegia in a patient with cold-induced urticaria

BACKGROUND

Cold-induced urticaria is an uncommon but well described phenomenon in which a spectrum of responses may result from exposure to a cold stimulus. Patients with cold-induced urticaria who require cold cardiopulmonary bypass are at risk for hypotensive episodes.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the case of a 69-year-old man with documented cold-induced urticaria who required aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass surgery.

METHODS

After receiving a prophylactic anti-inflammatory regimen, the patient underwent cold cardiopulmonary bypass. After systemic cooling to 32 degrees C, cold blood cardioplegia was administered at 4 degrees C to obtain initial cardiac standstill. Thirty minutes before anticipated rewarming, anti-inflammatory medications were again administered. After rewarming to 37 degrees C for more than 33 minutes, he was successfully weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass without inotropic or pressor support and with normal pulmonary compliance. The prophylactic regimen was continued postoperatively.

RESULTS

The patient was extubated 11 hours after surgery, and with the exception of a brief, self-limited episode of atrial fibrillation, his course was uneventful. He experienced no urticaria, angioedema, or hypotension and was discharged home on the fourth postoperative day.

CONCLUSIONS

Although it is likely that the need for cold cardiopulmonary bypass surgery in patients with cold-induced urticaria is uncommon, it is encouraging that such a regimen may allow for the successful completion of the surgery.

Parallel infusion of hydrocortisone ± chlorpheniramine bolus injection to prevent acute adverse reactions to antivenom for snakebites

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of continuous infusion of hydrocortisone with or without chlorpheniramine bolus against early adverse reactions to polyspecific antivenom.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial at General Hospital, Anuradhapura, Sri Lanka.

SUBJECTS

52 patients with snake envenoming were randomised to receive infusion of hydrocortisone (Group A), hydrocortisone with chlorpheniramine bolus (Group B) or placebo (Group C) during the administration of antivenom.

INTERVENTION

Hydrocortisone 1000 mg in 300 mL of normal saline infusion was started 5 min before and continued for 30 min after antivenom. Chlorpheniramine 10 mg intravenous bolus dose was given 5 min after commencement of antivenom.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Occurrence and severity of adverse reactions to antivenom.

RESULTS

Adverse reactions were observed in 80% (12/15) of Group A, 52% (11/21) of Group B, and 81% (13/16) of Group C. Reactions were mild or moderate except in two patients. A significant reduction in the number of adverse reactions was seen in Group B compared with the placebo group (difference, 29 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.2 to 58 percentage points). There was no significant difference between Group A and the placebo group.

CONCLUSION

Prophylaxis with a parallel hydrocortisone infusion alone is ineffective in reducing the occurrence of acute adverse reaction to antivenom serum, but combining it with chlorpheniramine seems efficacious.

Nimesulide and meloxicam are a safe alternative drugs for patients intolerant to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

BACKGROUND

Pseudoallergic reactions to ASA and NSAIDs in general are frequent and difficult to manage. The challenge with the suspected drug is considered unethical, therefore the only possible approach is a challenge with alternative drugs. Selective COX2 inhibitors are considered the most suitable alternative drugs. We describe the comparative results and follow-up of an oral challenge with nimesulide and meloxicam, in NSAIDs intolerant patients.

METHODS

381 patients (118 male, 263 female, mean age 53.2 years) with a well documented pseudoallergic reaction to NSAIDs underwent an oral challenge with these alternative drugs. All 381 patients were given nimesulide 88 of them were also given meloxicam. All patients were re-interviewed at six-month intervals up to two years after challenge.

RESULTS

98.4% of the patients tolerated nimesulide and 95.4% tolerated meloxicam. The reactions occurred during challenges were mild and easily manageable. Three out of the six nimesulide-intolerant patients could tolerate meloxicam, whereas only one of the four meloxicam-intolerant patients could tolerate nimesulide. At the follow-up, 96% of patients with previous negative challenge could tolerate nimesulide and within the patients which took meloxicam after challenge no pseudoallergic reaction occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The herein described challenge with alternative drugs, meloxicam and nimesulide, is a safe tool for the management of NSAIDs-intolerant patients. The two tested drug are safe and reliable alternatives for these patients.

Lichturtikaria

Solar urticaria serves as a model to illustrate the photodiagnostic approach in rare photodermatoses and to demonstrate how patients can be effectively helped by prophylactic and therapeutic intervention. To accomplish these tasks, advanced knowledge and experience in photodermatology is required, along with equipment which is often available in specialized centers only. A list is attached listing the dermatology departments with photodiagnostic units in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.

Twenty-four-hour activity and consistency of activity of levocetirizine and desloratadine in the skin

AIM

Levocetirizine, the active enantiomer of cetirizine, and desloratadine, the active metabolite of loratadine, are two recently introduced anti-H1 agents. We set out to compare their antihistaminic activity in the skin for 24 h in a double-blind, randomized cross-over trial.

METHODS

The skin reaction to histamine administered by prick tests (100 mg ml(-1)) was measured by the surface areas of weals and flares for 24 h [before treatment, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 h after a single dose of levocetirizine (5 mg), desloratadine (5 mg) or placebo] in 18 healthy volunteers (34.8 +/- 9.4 years; 14 women). The areas under the curves (AUC) of the weal and flare areas as a function of time were compared by ANOVA.

RESULTS

A highly significant overall treatment effect (P < 0.0001) was observed and both weals and flares were inhibited. The pairwise comparisons showed that the activity of levocetirizine and desloratadine was significantly superior to that of placebo (P < 0.0001), and the activity of levocetirizine was significantly superior to that of desloratadine (P < 0.0001). 'Total' weal inhibition (> or = 95%) occurred only with levocetirizine. Median values of maximal weal inhibition were 44.2% with placebo, 55.0% with desloratadine and 100% with levocetirizine. The time to maximal weal inhibition was 4 h (median value) for all three study drugs, but scattered over a wider range for desloratadine (3-24 h) than levocetirizine (2-4 h). With desloratadine, five of 18 (28%) subjects reached weal inhibition of at least 70% at between 3 and 10 h, whereas with levocetirizine all subjects [18/18 (100%)] reached this level of weal inhibition at between 1 and 3 h. The median duration of 70% weal inhibition was zero with placebo and desloratadine, and was 21.4 h with levocetirizine (P < 0.0001 between the three study drugs, and P < 0.0001 between the two active drugs). No uncommon adverse events were reported, and no subject withdrew from the study due to an adverse event.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that the activity of levocetirizine in suppressing skin reactivity to histamine was clearly superior to that of desloratadine for 24 h after a single dose. In addition, its activity was more consistent and lasted longer.

Dietary recommendations for patients allergic to Anisakis simplex

BACKGROUND

Anisakis simplex, a fish parasite, causes allergic urticaria, angioedema and anaphylactic shock through an IgE-mediated hypersensitivity mechanism. Consensus on the dietary recommendations that should be given to allergic patients is lacking. Our objective was to evaluate the usefulness of different types of diets in preventing further reactions in patients allergic to A. simplex.

METHODS

Twenty-eight adult patients, who had suffered an allergic episode caused by A. simplex were asked to follow one of the following three diets for a mean period of 13.16 months: a fish-free diet (diet 1; n = 19), a diet including fish frozen for more than 48 hours (diet 2; n = 9) and a diet with fresh fish (diet 3; n = 12). In all patients raw fish was excluded. Relapse rates and changes in total serum IgE and specific IgE to A. simplex were studied during the follow up.

RESULTS

During the 13-month follow-up none of the patients developed anaphylaxis. Urticaria symptoms were present in 5.8 %, 11.1 % (n.s) and 33.3 % (p = 0.016) of patients following diets 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Total IgE decreased by 64 % (p < 0.05), 48 % (p < 0.05) and 39.4 % (p < 0.05), respectively. Specific IgE to A. simplex decreased by 50.7 % (p < 0.05), 54.1 % (p < 0.05) and 23.6 % (p < 0.05) after diets 1, 2 and 3, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found among the groups in variations in total and specific IgE.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients allergic to A. simplex can eat fish that has been frozen at -20 C for 48 hours without risk of a severe allergic reaction. Long term decreases in specific and total IgE may not be good markers of eventual contact with A. simplex.

Prevention of polymorphous light eruption and solar urticaria

Polymorphous light eruption (PLE) and solar urticaria (SU) are two photodermatoses that are induced by ultraviolet radiation and sometimes by visible light. This article will review the various means of preventing PLE and SU with an emphasis on the role of sunscreens.

Oral desensitization in papular urticaria in children

Papular urticaria (PU) is among the commonest skin ailments in children. Induced specific desensitization to insect bites is theoretically an effective means of prevention of PU. In this double blind placebo controlled study, an oral vaccine prepared from insect saliva was compared with placebo (stable vaccine solvent). Vaccine and placebo effectiveness were tested by counting active PU lesions, serum eosinophils, and IgE, before and after 4 months of treatment. Statistically significant differences between oral vaccine and placebo were not found in the clinical or the immunological variables tested. We conclude that, although a lack of oral vaccine efficacy was suspected, larger study samples are needed to strengthen our conclusion.