Use of irbesartan to maintain sinus rhythm in patients with long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation: a prospective and randomized study

Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure:

AF in Heart Failure. Atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure are commonly occurring cardiac disorders that often exist concomitantly. The prognostic significance of the presence or absence of atrial fibrillation, as an independent risk factor, in patients with heart failure remains controversial. Antiarrhythmic drugs with good hemodynamic profiles and neutral effects on survival are preferred treatments for converting atrial fibrillation and maintaining sinus rhythm. Other standard therapies for congestive heart failure, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and beta-blockers also have a role in the treatment of these coexisting disease states. The article presents an overview of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and reviews the prevalence, prognostic significance, and efficacy of various antiarrhythmic agents for the conversion and maintenance of sinus rhythm.

[Electrophysiologic remodeling and drug treatment of atrial fibrillation]

Since 1995, a number of studies have established and detailed the mechanisms of electrical and structural atrial remodeling induced by atrial fibrillation. Atrial remodeling involves many cellular components, from ionic channels to connexins. The determination of these mechanisms may help to define a new therapeutic targets of atrial fibrillation, a frequent arrhythmia that remains difficult to treat. Atrial remodeling prevention may lead to limit the evolution of the arrhythmia (early recurrences after reduction, AF secondary to atrial tachycardia, permanent AF, decrease in atrial contractility, sinus dysfunction). Except amiodarone, the usual antiarrhythmic drugs have no effect on atrial remodeling. Calcium channel inhibitors prevent early remodeling but have no effect on prolonged remodeling. Digoxin increases remodeling. Angiotensin II receptor inhibitors have been shown to prevent early AF recurrence after reduction and are very promising in such a direction. Other methods such as the one of antioxidant therapy seem to be promising and could define soon a new antiarrhythmic therapeutic class, the antiremodeling drugs.

Some recent randomized clinical trials in the management of atrial fibrillation

It is not possible to review all the recent randomized clinical trials in management of atrial fibrillation. The author has chosen to select a few that illustrate key points. "Immediate" or "early" recurrence of atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion is an important part of inefficacy of drug therapy and more insight into the mechanisms of this phenomenon is needed. Two recent trials in which verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, and irbesartan, an angiotensin receptor blocking agent, added to a standard antiarrhythmic attenuated early recurrences of atrial fibrillation are of particular interest. Trials of drugs and pacing for maintenance of sinus rhythm continue to demonstrate only modest efficacy. Amiodarone, the most effective agent, is not markedly better and there are concerns about its adverse effect profile during long-term use. Other nonpharmacologic therapies have not yet been, but will need to be, evaluated in properly designed randomized clinical trials with clinically important end-points. The absence of a simple, highly effective treatment for the maintenance of sinus rhythm with few adverse effects has been part of the foundation for recent trials comparing the rate control strategy to the rhythm control strategy, particularly in the elderly patient. Six such trials have been completed and one is in progress. The data from these trials is quite consistent for the elderly patient with stroke risk factors and predominantly persistent atrial fibrillation: (1) any advantage for the rhythm control strategy remains unproven; (2) the rate control strategy has some clear advantages and should be considered more often as a primary approach in such patients; and (3) anticoagulation should not be discontinued in such high risk patients, even when it is felt that sinus rhythm has been maintained. Anticoagulation is under-utilized in this setting and alternatives to warfarin are badly needed. Trials in progress may be helpful in this regard. Finally, primary prevention of atrial fibrillation needs more attention. Recent randomized trials with trandolapril after myocardial infarction and physiologic pacing have given some insight into how this might be accomplished.

Recent advances in drug therapy for atrial fibrillation

Despite the major new insights into our knowledge of the mechanisms underlying initiation and perpetuation of atrial fibrillation (AF) gained in the last decade, the treatment of this common arrhythmia remains unsatisfactory in many patients. Although several new treatment modalities (e.g., internal cardioversion, pulmonary vein ablation, preventive pacing) have been developed, pharmacologic therapy remains the first-line therapy in most patients with AF. As illustrated by recent trials comparing rhythm control and rate control, current antifibrillatory drugs are hampered by a relatively low success rate in maintaining long-term sinus rhythm and the occurrence of proarrhythmic and other adverse events. This article discusses currently available antiarrhythmic drugs for rhythm and rate control, with special emphasis on more recently developed drugs and drugs still under development. Selective blockers of atrial ion channels (IKur and IK.ACh), multi-ion channel blockers, and selective A1-adenosine receptor antagonists are examples of the newer antiarrhythmic drugs that are expected to be more effective and safer than those currently available.

Enalapril decreases the incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: insight from the Studies Of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) trials

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequently encountered in patients with heart failure (HF) and is also a predictor of morbidity and mortality in this population. Recent experimental studies have shown electrical and structural atrial remodeling with increased fibrosis in animals with HF and have suggested a preventive effect of ACE inhibitors (ACEi) on the development of AF. To verify the hypothesis that ACEi prevent the development of AF in patients with HF, we conducted a retrospective analysis of the patients from the Montreal Heart Institute (MHI) included in the Studies Of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Clinical charts were reviewed and serial ECGs interpreted by a single cardiologist blinded to drug allocation. Patients with AF or flutter on the baseline ECG were excluded. Baseline characteristics were obtained from the SOLVD databases. The mean follow-up was 2.9+/-1.0 years. Of the 391 patients randomly assigned at MHI, 374 were in sinus rhythm at the time of random assignment, with 186 taking enalapril and 188 taking placebo. Baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups except for a higher incidence of previous myocardial infarction in the enalapril group. Fifty-five patients had AF during the follow-up: 10 (5.4%) in the enalapril group and 45 (24%) in the placebo group (P<0.0001). By Cox multivariate analysis, enalapril was the most powerful predictor for risk reduction of AF (hazard ratio, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.44; P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with the ACEi enalapril markedly reduces the risk of development of atrial fibrillation in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

Heart failure complicated by atrial fibrillation: mechanistic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications

Atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure are two distinct clinical entities that are responsible for significant morbidity and mortality in the Western world. Hypertension, coronary artery disease, and nonischemic cardiomyopathy represent the most prevalent underlying pathologies of both diseases, implying a coincidence of both in many patients. The prevalence of atrial fibrillation with a progressive degree of congestive heart failure is increasing, as judged by New York Heart Association functional class. Moreover, the presence of congestive heart failure has been identified as one of the most powerful independent predictors of atrial fibrillation, with a sixfold increase in relative risk of its development. On the other hand, atrial fibrillation can cause or significantly aggravate symptoms of congestive heart failure in previously asymptomatic or well-compensated patients. In some patients, symptomatic dilated cardiomyopathy may develop over time entirely due to atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular rates. Upon restoration of sinus rhythm, this type of "tachymyopathy" has been shown to be often reversible. Recent investigations of the physiologic and structural changes of the atrial myocardium ("electrical and structural remodeling") have shown that neurohumoral activation, fibrosis, and apoptosis are demonstrable with both diseases. On the other hand, experimental data suggest that the substrates of atrial fibrillation in congestive heart failure are different from those of pure atrial tachycardia-related forms of atrial fibrillation. This review highlights the clinical and pathophysiologic similarities and differences of atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure relevant to the understanding, treatment, and prevention of these diseases in the population at risk.

Amiodarone minimizes experimental autoimmune myocarditis in rats

Amiodarone, a promising drug for the treatment of tachyarrythmias, was recently found to have immunomodulatory effects in vitro. We hypothesized that amiodarone would affect the immune system in vivo and examined the effect of amiodarone on myocarditis in rats. We induced experimental autoimmune myocarditis in rats by cardiac myosin immunization and treated the animals with an intraperitoneal injection of amiodarone at 25 mg/kg/every other day, 10 times after the induction of experimental autoimmune myocarditis. In the treated group, both microscopic and macroscopic examinations showed reduced heart weights, a mild and localized infiltration of inflammatory cells and fibrosis in the myocardium, and a mild congestion in the liver and lungs as compared with the control group. The phenotypic distribution of lymphocytes in peripheral blood showed a significant decrease in the CD4/CD8a ratio in the treated group, but not in the control group. The proportion of mast cells involved in inflammatory cell infiltration was lower in the treated group than the control group. In vitro, amiodarone inhibited the proliferation of mast cells by arresting them in the G2 phase of the cell cycle. These results indicated that amiodarone minimized the progression of experimental autoimmune myocarditis, suggesting a potential therapeutic role for amiodarone treatment in patients suffering from myocarditis, especially myocarditis complicated by cardiac arrhythmias. One possible mechanism by which amiodarone minimizes the progression of experimental autoimmune myocarditis may be to affect the immune system via the immunomodulatory effects on T cell and mast cell functions.

Atrial fibrillation: hypertension as a causative agent, risk factor for complications, and potential therapeutic target

Atrial fibrillation and hypertension are 2 prevalent, and often coexistent, conditions in the North American population. Their incidence increases with advancing age, and they are responsible for considerable morbidity and mortality. Although the relation between the 2 conditions has long been known, the treatment of hypertension is not currently a focus in the clinical management of atrial fibrillation. Hypertension is associated with left ventricular hypertrophy, impaired ventricular filling, left atrial enlargement, and slowing of atrial conduction velocity. These changes in cardiac structure and physiology favor the development of atrial fibrillation, and they increase the risk of thromboembolic complications. Conventional therapy of atrial fibrillation has focused on interventions to control heart rate and rhythm and the prevention of stroke through the use of anticoagulant medications. In patients with atrial fibrillation, aggressive treatment of hypertension may reverse the structural changes in the heart, reduce thromboembolic complications, and retard or prevent the occurrence of atrial fibrillation. Specific pharmacotherapy could potentially play a major role in the primary and secondary prevention of atrial fibrillation and its complications.

The role of atrial dilatation in the domestication of atrial fibrillation

Numerous clinical investigations as well as recent experimental studies have demonstrated that atrial fibrillation (AF) is a progressive arrhythmia. With time paroxysmal AF becomes persistent and the success rate of cardioversion of persistent AF declines. Electrical remodeling (shortening of atrial refractoriness) develops within the first days of AF and contributes to the increase in stability of the arrhythmia. However, 'domestication of AF' must also depend on other mechanisms since the persistence of AF continues to increase after electrical remodeling has been completed. During the first days of AF in the goat, electrical and contractile remodeling (loss of atrial contractility) followed exactly the same time course suggesting that they are due to the same underlying mechanism. Contractile remodeling not only enhances the risk of atrial thrombus formation, it also enhances atrial dilatation by increasing the compliance of the fibrillating atrium. In goats with chronic AV-block atrial dilatation increased the duration of artificially induced AF-episodes but did not change atrial refractoriness or the AF cycle length. When AF was maintained a couple of days in these animals, a shortening of the atrial refractory period did occur. However, the AF cycle length did not decrease. Long lasting episodes of AF with a long AF cycle length and a wide excitable gap suggest that in this model AF is mainly promoted by conduction disturbances. Chronic atrial stretch induces activation of numerous signaling pathways leading to cellular hypertrophy, fibroblast proliferation and tissue fibrosis. The resulting electroanatomical substrate in dilated atria is characterized by increased non-uniform anisotropy and macroscopic slowing of conduction, promoting reentrant circuits in the atria. Prevention of electroanatomical remodeling by blockade of pathways activated by chronic atrial stretch therefore provides a promising strategy for future treatment of AF.

Old and new antiarrhythmic drugs for converting and maintaining sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation: comparative efficacy and results of trials

In managing atrial fibrillation (AF), the main therapeutic strategies include rate control, termination of the arrhythmia, and the prevention of recurrences and thromboembolic events. Safety and efficacy considerations are important in optimizing the choice of an antiarrhythmic drug for the treatment of AF. Recently approved antiarrhythmics, such as dofetilide, and promising investigational drugs, such as azimilide and dronedarone, may change the treatment landscape for AF. For medical conversion of recent-onset AF, class IC antiarrhythmic drugs, administered as an oral bolus, have been demonstrated to be the most efficacious pharmacologic conversion agents. Intravenous ibutilide and oral dofetilide both have efficacies superior to placebo in controlled trials for converting persistent AF. Comparative trials in paroxysmal AF have demonstrated that flecainide, propafenone, quinidine, and sotalol are equally effective in preventing recurrences of AF. Amiodarone has been demonstrated to be more efficacious than propafenone or sotalol in the Canadian Trial of Atrial Fibrillation. In persistent AF, twice-daily dofetilide has been shown to be as or more effective than low-dose sotalol given twice daily for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with AF. Trials have demonstrated that subjective adverse effects are less frequent with class IC drugs, sotalol, and dofetilide compared with such drugs as quinidine. In patients without structural heart disease, flecainide, propafenone, and D,L-sotalol are the initial drugs of choice, given their reasonable efficacy, low incidence of subjective side effects, and lack of significant end-organ toxicity. Treating AF in patients with left ventricular dysfunction can be difficult because of associated electrophysiologic derangements, potential proarrhythmic concerns, and negative inotropic effects of antiarrhythmics. Some data exist suggesting that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers can prevent AF either by preventing atrial dilation and stretch-induced arrhythmias or by blocking the renin-angiotensin system. In post-myocardial infarction patients, D,L-sotalol, dofetilide, and amiodarone-and in congestive heart failure patients, amiodarone and dofetilide-have demonstrated neutral effects on survival in controlled trials. In the Congestive Heart Failure Survival Trial of Antiarrhythmic Therapy (CHF-STAT), amiodarone lowered the frequency of AF development and improved left ventricular ejection fraction over time. In CHF-STAT, there was lower mortality in patients who converted from AF to sinus rhythm. Dofetilide decreased rehospitalization for congestive heart failure in the Danish Investigations of Arrhythmia and Mortality on Dofetilide (DIAMOND) trials. Neutral effects on survival and favorable hemodynamics have positioned amiodarone and dofetilide as the antiarrhythmics of choice in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. In post-myocardial infarction patients, sotalol is an additional agent to consider for treatment of AF in this setting.

Antiarrhythmic drugs: new agents and evolving concepts

Properties of several new antiarrhythmic drugs are summarised in this review article. Recent concepts concerning their safety and efficacy of antiarrhythmics are discussed. A brief perspective on possible future strategies for pharmacotherapy of arrhythmias is provided.

Effects of irbesartan on cloned potassium channels involved in human cardiac repolarization

We studied the effects of irbesartan, a selective angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist, on human ether-a-go-go-related gene (HERG), KvLQT1+minK, hKv1.5, and Kv4.3 channels using the patch-clamp technique. Irbesartan exhibited a low affinity for HERG and KvLQT1+minK channels (IC(50) = 193.0 +/- 49.8 and 314.6 +/- 85.4 microM, respectively). In hKv1.5 channels, irbesartan produced two types of block, depending on the concentration tested. At 0.1 microM, irbesartan inhibited the current in a time-dependent manner (22 +/- 3.9% at +60 mV). The blockade increased steeply with channel activation increasing at more positive potentials. However, at 10 microM, irbesartan induced a time-independent blockade that occurred in the range of potentials of channel opening, reaching its maximum at approximately 0 mV, and remaining unchanged at more positive potentials (24.0 +/- 1.0% at +60 mV). In Kv4.3 currents, irbesartan produced a concentration-dependent block, which resulted in two IC(50) values (1.0 +/- 0.1 nM and 7.2 +/- 0.6 microM). At 1 microM, it inhibited the peak current and accelerated the time course of inactivation, decreasing the total charge crossing the membrane (36.6 +/- 7.8% at +50 mV). Irbesartan shifted the inactivation curve of Kv4.3 channels, the blockade increasing as the amount of inactivated channels increased. Molecular modeling was used to define energy-minimized dockings of irbesartan to hKv1.5 and HERG channels. In conclusion, irbesartan blocks Kv4.3 and hKv1.5 channels at therapeutic concentrations, whereas the blockade of HERG and KvLQT1+minK channels occurred only at supratherapeutic levels. In hKv1.5, a receptor site is apparent on each alpha-subunit of the channel, whereas in HERG channels a common binding site is present at the pore.

Atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure

Atrial fibrillation and heart failure are very common cardiac disorders, and both are associated with symptoms, significant morbidity, and mortality. Studies have attempted to determine the prognostic significance of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure. Whether atrial fibrillation is an independent risk factor of mortality remains controversial. Multiple trials using either pharmacologic or nonpharmacologic therapies in an attempt to manage atrial fibrillation have been developed. The purposes of this review are to present an overview of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and to discuss the prevalence, prognostic significance, complications, mechanisms, and trials that have formed the therapies presently used.