Examining Disparities in Route of Surgery and Postoperative Complications in Black Race and Hysterectomy

Racial and ethnic disparities in access to minimally invasive gynecologic surgery for benign pathology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review current US literature and describe the extent, source, and impact of disparities that exist among Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) in surgical route and outcomes for hysterectomy, myomectomy, and endometriosis surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite the nationwide trend toward minimally invasive surgery (MIS), BIPOC women are disproportionally less likely to undergo MIS hysterectomy and myomectomy and have higher rates of perioperative complications. African American women, in particular, receive significantly disparate care. Contemporary literature on the prevalence of endometriosis in BIPOC women is lacking. Further, there is little data on the racial and ethnic differences in endometriosis surgery access and outcomes.

SUMMARY

Racial and ethnic disparities in access to minimally invasive gynecologic surgery for benign pathology exist and these differences are not fully accounted for by patient, socioeconomic, or healthcare infrastructure factors. Initiatives that incentivize hiring surgeons trained to perform complex gynecologic surgery, standardized pathways for route of surgery, quality improvement focused on increased hospital MIS volume, and hospital-based public reporting of MIS volume data may be of benefit for minimizing disparities. Further, initiatives to reduce disparities need to address racism, implicit bias, and healthcare structural issues that perpetuate disparities.

Management of Symptomatic Uterine Leiomyomas: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 228

Uterine leiomyomas (fibroids) are the most common solid and symptomatic neoplasm in women. They are the leading indication for hysterectomy (1, 2), which is a definitive and effective surgical treatment for leiomyoma. However, many patients benefit from and seek out management options other than hysterectomy because they desire future childbearing or wish to retain their uterus. The purpose of this Practice Bulletin is to provide updated evidence-based recommendations for the medical, procedural, and surgical management of symptomatic leiomyomas. Discussion of the use of morcellation in the surgical management of leiomyomas is beyond the scope of this document and is addressed in a separate American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) publication (3).

Uterine Fibroids in Black Women: A Race-Stratified Subgroup Analysis of Treatment Outcomes After Laparoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation

Background: The disease and treatment burden of uterine fibroids (UF) in Black women is substantially greater compared with other racial groups, with higher rates of complications and poorer outcomes with both hysterectomy and myomectomy. The inequities in the access Black women have to minimally invasive routes of surgery contribute to their burden of illness. Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation (LAP-RFA) is a minimally invasive, safe, and effective uterine-sparing treatment option. Methods: This subgroup analysis of the LAP-RFA Pivotal Trial stratified outcomes by race comparing White women (n = 28, 21%) versus Black women (n = 46, 34%). Results: At baseline, Black women had more fibroids on average (7.3 vs. 3.7; P ≤ 0.001), a greater symptom severity score (SSS) (P ≤ 0.001), and a lower health-related quality of life (HRQoL) score (P = 0.005) than White women. At 36 months post-treatment with LAP-RFA, the statistical differences that existed with baseline SSS and HRQoL score were eliminated between Black and White women. Menstrual blood loss (140.1 mL vs. 127.02 mL; P = 0.44) and mean fibroid volume reduction (47.5 cm³ vs. 36.0 cm³; P = 0.17) were similar between Black and White women at 12 months. Although not statistically significant, the intraoperative total blood loss and uterine blood loss was lower in Black women than White women, despite greater operative time (160 minutes vs. 137 minutes; P = 0.09). Conclusions: These results are promising in providing an alternative uterine-sparing option for Black women and may help to provide a minimally invasive option that can address some of the racial inequities in care for Black women with UF.

Health disparities of African Americans in reproductive medicine

The first paper describing an association between African American race, infertility prevalence, and outcomes of fertility treatments was published more than 20 years ago, calling initial attention to differences in how infertility is experienced, diagnosed, and managed in African Americans. Since that initial publication, multiple other studies have explored African American race and its association with elements of the fertility spectrum-disparities that have been durable over time. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of the evolution of aspects of this research focusing on the outcomes of infertility treatments and barriers to access. A consideration of the system-based practice issues that interface with timely fertility evaluation and treatment in ways that challenge reproductive health equity will be presented.

Transparency of racial participation reporting in randomized controlled trials of minimally invasive surgical techniques

BACKGROUND

Enrolment of racial/ethnic minorities in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has historically been poor, despite efforts at improving access to RCTs. Under-representation of racial/ethnic minorities limits the external validity and generalizability of trials. Our objective was to determine to what extent are published RCTs of minimally invasive surgical techniques reporting the racial composition of their study cohorts and to describe the racial composition of patients enrolled in these trials, where data were available.

METHODS

EMBASE (OvidSP®), MEDLINE (OvidSP®), and Cochrane (Wiley®) databases were systematically searched from inception to December 22, 2017 to identify all RCTs comparing minimally invasive and classical surgical techniques. The Mann-Kendall trend test was used to evaluate reporting trends over the study period. Predictors of racial reporting were evaluated using logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Our search strategy yielded 9,321 references of which 496 RCTs met our inclusion/exclusion criteria. Racial information was reported in 20 (4.03%) studies. There was no significant improvement in racial reporting over the study period (p for trend = 0.31). Of the 17 different patient populations accounting for the 20 RCTs, 14 (82.4%) originated from the USA. Multicenter RCTs had significantly increased likelihood of reporting racial composition of the patient cohort (odds ratio 5.10, p = 0.025). White/Caucasian patients accounted for 84.5% of the pooled patient population, with Black/African American, Asian and Latin/Hispanic patients accounting for 7.9%, 1.2%, and 2.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Among RCTs assessing minimally invasive surgical techniques over the past 30 years, data on included patients' race is poorly reported. In addition to important efforts to improve access to clinical trials for racial and ethnic minorities, efforts aimed at improving reporting and transparency of surgical RCTs are sorely needed.

Myofascial Pelvic Pain: An Overlooked and Treatable Cause of Chronic Pelvic Pain

Myofascial pelvic pain is a common, nonarticular musculoskeletal disorder characterized by the presence of myofascial trigger points in the lower abdominal wall and/or pelvic floor muscles. Myofascial pelvic pain is involved in an estimated 22% to 94% of cases of chronic pelvic pain, which is one of the most common gynecologic conditions in the United States. Myofascial pelvic pain may exist independently or in conjunction with disorders such as vaginismus, dysmenorrhea, and endometriosis and is frequently a causative factor in sexual pain or dyspareunia. This article reviews the pathophysiology, assessment, and treatment options for myofascial pelvic pain, with a particular focus on trigger point injections. Increased recognition and treatment of this commonly overlooked diagnosis has the potential to improve care and outcomes for many patients suffering from chronic pelvic pain.

Racial disparities in complications and costs after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The study objective was to examine the impact of race on inpatient complications and costs after inpatient surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we identified women who underwent surgery for POP between 2012 and 2014. Patient demographics, outcomes, hospital characteristics, and hospital costs were extracted. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared by race using Kruskal-Wallis for continuous variables and Chi-squared test for categorical variables. Multivariate logistic and linear regressions were used to identify variables associated with increased complications and costs respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 29,347 women with a median age of 62 years underwent inpatient surgery for POP between 2012 and 2014. There were 4,419 women (15%) who had at least one in-hospital postoperative complication. Rates of any postoperative complication were significantly higher among Black women (20%) than among white, Hispanic, and women of other races (16%, 11%, and 13% respectively, p < 0.01). The median total cost associated with surgeries for POP was $8,267 (IQR $6,008-$11,734). After multivariate analyses controlled for potential confounders, postoperative complications remained independently associated with Black race (aOR 1.21) whereas Hispanic and other races were associated with decreased odds of complications (aOR 0.62, and aOR 0.77) relative to white race. After controlling for confounders, Hispanic women had lower associated hospital costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Black women undergoing inpatient surgery for POP had a 21% increase in the odds of complications, but no difference in costs compared with white women, whereas Hispanic women had the lowest odds of complications and lowest costs.

Risk-prediction Model for Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Develop a model for predicting adverse outcomes at the time of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) for benign indications.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Large academic center.

PATIENTS

All patients undergoing LH for benign indications at our institution between 2009 and 2017.

INTERVENTIONS

LH (including robot-assisted and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy) was performed per standard technique. Data about the patient, surgeon, perioperative adverse outcomes (intraoperative complications, readmission, reoperation, operative time >4 hours, and postoperative medical complications or length of stay >2 days), and uterine weight were collected retrospectively. Pathologic uterine weight was used as a surrogate for predicted preoperative uterine weight. The sample was randomly split, using a random sequence generator, into 2 cohorts, one for deriving the model and the other to validate the model.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 3441 patients were included. The rate of composite adverse outcomes was 14.1%. The final logistic regression risk-prediction model identified 6 variables predictive of an adverse outcome at the time of LH: race, history of laparotomy, history of laparoscopy, predicted preoperative uterine weight, body mass index, and surgeon annual case volume. Specifically included were race (97% increased odds of an adverse outcome for black women [95% confidence interval (CI), 34%-110%] and 34% increased odds of an adverse outcome for women of other races [95% CI, -11% to 104%] when compared with white women), history of laparotomy (69% increased odds of an adverse outcome [95% CI, 26%-128%]), history of laparoscopy (65% increased odds of an adverse outcome [95% CI, 21%-124%]), and predicted preoperative uterine weight (2.9% increased odds of an adverse outcome for each 100-g increase in predicted weight [95% CI, 2%-4%]). Body mass index and surgeon annual case volume also had a statistically significant nonlinear relationship with the risk of an adverse outcome. The c-statistic values for the derivation and validation cohorts were 0.74 and 0.72, respectively. The model is best calibrated for patients at lower risk (<20%).

CONCLUSION

The LH risk-prediction model is a potentially powerful tool for predicting adverse outcomes in patients planning hysterectomy.

Postoperative Risks for Hispanic Patients Undergoing Hysterectomy for Benign Indications

BACKGROUND

Hispanic patients have previously been shown to have relatively lower odds of complication following hysterectomy compared with non-Hispanic white patients, but little is known about specific risks for this group. Our primary objective was to identify differences in proportions of specific complications experienced by Hispanic patients following hysterectomy for benign indications as compared with non-Hispanic white patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study examining differences in complication rates following benign hysterectomy between Hispanic and non-Hispanic white patients in NSQIP-participating hospitals from 2012 to 2016.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 102,051 women were included. A total of 15.0% were Hispanic and 85.0% were non-Hispanic white. Hispanic patients were more likely to have class 1 or 2 obesity (59.7 vs 49.8%), diabetes (10.9 vs 6.7%), and anemia (hematocrit < 33: 14.1 vs 6.5%); p < 0.01 for all. Hispanic patients were more likely to undergo abdominal hysterectomy (30.0 vs 19.1%, p < 0.01) and to remain inpatient for 2-6 days (38.8 vs 24.0%, p < 0.01). After adjustment for possible confounders including anemia, an increased odds of requiring blood transfusion persisted only in the laparoscopic and vaginal groups. Hispanic patients had a decreased or equal odds for all other examined complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with non-Hispanic white patients, Hispanic women had a higher odds of requiring blood transfusion even when undergoing minimally invasive laparoscopic and vaginal approaches to hysterectomy. Despite a higher proportion of open surgery, Hispanic patients had a decreased or equal odds of postoperative complications.

Minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometriosis: Surgical outcomes based on surgeon specialty

Introduction:

To evaluate differences in surgical outcomes of minimally invasive hysterectomy performed for endometriosis between general gynecologists and gynecologic oncologists.

Methods:

Utilizing the 2016–2018 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) hysterectomy dataset, we evaluated baseline characteristics and surgical outcomes for patients who underwent a minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometriosis between general gynecology and gynecologic oncology groups.

Results:

From 2016 to 2018, a total of 3751 minimally invasive hysterectomies were performed for the primary diagnosis of endometriosis. Of these cases, 3129 (83.4%) were performed by general gynecologists and 622 (16.6%) by gynecologic oncologists. There were several differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. Notably, general gynecologists performed a higher proportion of vaginal hysterectomies (7.9% vs 0.6%, p < 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in overall 30-day complications or mortality between general gynecology and oncology groups, with the exception of a higher rate of postoperative sepsis (0.8% vs 0.2%, p = 0.01) in hysterectomies performed by oncologists. Compared to general gynecologists, oncologists had a longer operative time (134.9 ± 65.4 min vs 129 ± 60.9 min, p = 0.05). Multivariate regression of multiple tracked and composite outcomes revealed no consistent confounding variables other than race. In fact, African American race was a statistically significant predictive factor of composite complications (OR 1.80, p < 0.01), morbidity (OR 1.84, p < 0.05), and unplanned readmission (OR 2.30, p < 0.01). Surgeon specialty was not associated with composite complications, hysterectomy-specific complications, or readmission.

Conclusion:

There are no significant differences in surgical outcomes for minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometriosis between these two surgical subspecialties.

Discovering and Reflecting on Bias: A Discussion about Challenges and Benefits of Culturally Centered Patient Care with Women Physicians of the East Bay

Implicit or unconscious bias is a lens through which we see our world based on our past experiences and learned stereotypes. Within health care, this lens of bias has typically had a negative impact on patient care, particularly for marginalized populations. We sat down with 3 physicians within Kaiser Permanente East Bay to learn about their personal experiences of bias in patient care. We also discuss the importance of acknowledging bias and practicing cultural humility in order to best ally with our patients. We are hopeful our conversation with these physicians will inspire more of the same, leading to improved health care for those that have suffered from bias in the past.

Racial/Ethnic Differences in the Risk of Surgical Complications and Posthysterectomy Hospitalization among Women Undergoing Hysterectomy for Benign Conditions

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Evaluate whether 30- and 90-day surgical complication and postoperative hospitalization rates after hysterectomy for benign conditions differ by race/ethnicity and whether the differences remain after controlling for patient, hospital, and surgical characteristics.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using administrative data. The exposure was race/ethnicity. The outcomes included 5 different surgical complications/categories and posthysterectomy inpatient hospitalization, all identified through 30 and 90 days after hysterectomy hospital discharge, with the exception of hemorrhage/hematoma, which was only identified through 30 days. To examine the association between race/ethnicity and each outcome, we used logistic regression with clustering of procedures within hospitals, adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics and surgical approach.

SETTING

Multistate, including Florida and New York.

PATIENTS

Women aged ≥18 years who underwent hysterectomy for benign conditions using State Inpatient Databases and State Ambulatory Surgery Databases.

INTERVENTIONS

Hysterectomy for benign conditions.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We included 183 697 women undergoing hysterectomy for benign conditions from January 2011 to September 2014. In analysis, adjusting for surgery route and other factors, black race was associated with increased risk of 30-day digestive system complications (multivariable adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.78-2.21), surgical-site infection (aOR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.18-1.53), posthysterectomy hospitalization (aOR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.22-1.40), and urologic complications (aOR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.34) compared with white race. Asian/Pacific Islander race was associated with increased risk of 30-day urologic complications (aOR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.08-2.03), intraoperative injury to abdominal/pelvic organs (aOR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.23-1.75), and hemorrhage/hematoma (aOR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.06-1.67) compared with white race. Hispanic ethnicity was associated with increased risk of 30-day posthysterectomy hospitalization (aOR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.02-1.20) compared with white race. All findings were similar at 90 days.

CONCLUSION

Black and Asian/Pacific Islander women had higher risk of some 30- and 90-day surgical complications after hysterectomy than white women. Black and Hispanic women had higher risk of posthysterectomy hospitalization. Intervention strategies aimed at identifying and better managing disparities in pre-existing conditions/comorbidities could reduce racial/ethnic differences in outcomes.

Association of Race/Ethnicity with Surgical Route and Perioperative Outcomes of Hysterectomy for Leiomyomas

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the associations among race/ethnicity, route of surgery, and perioperative outcomes for women undergoing hysterectomy for uterine leiomyomas.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Multistate.

PATIENTS

Women who underwent hysterectomies for leiomyomas from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, 2014 to 2017.

INTERVENTIONS

None. Exposures of interest were race/ethnicity and route of surgery.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Racial/ethnic variation in route of surgery and perioperative outcomes. Propensity score matching was employed to control for possible confounders. We identified 20 133 women who underwent nonemergent abdominal hysterectomy (AH), laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH), or vaginal hysterectomy (VH) for leiomyomas. We defined minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH) as LH or VH. Black women were more likely to have open surgery (AH vs MIH adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.07-2.38; AH vs VH aOR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.54-2.08; AH vs LH aOR, 2.27; 95% CI, 2.13-2.44) than white women. Likewise, Hispanic women were more likely to have open surgery (AH vs MIH aOR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.58-1.96; AH vs LH aOR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.61-2.00) than white women. Black women were more likely to experience any complication after hysterectomy (AH aOR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.31-1.80; VH aOR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.02-2.68; LH aOR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.13-1.66) than white women. Hispanic women were less likely than white women to experience major complications after VH (aOR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.08-0.98). Compared with white women, the mean length of stay was longer for black women who underwent AH or LH. The mean total operation time was higher for all minority groups (except for Asian/other undergoing AH) regardless of surgical approach.

CONCLUSION

Women of minority race/ethnicity were more likely to undergo abdominal rather than MIH for leiomyomas. Even when controlling for route of surgery, they were more likely to experience perioperative complications.

Concordance of Resident and Patient Perceptions of Culturally Dexterous Patient Care Skills

PURPOSE

Disparities in surgical care persist. To mitigate these disparities, we are implementing and testing the Provider Awareness and Cultural dexterity Toolkit for Surgeons (PACTS), a curriculum to improve surgical residents' cultural dexterity during clinical encounters. We analyzed baseline data to look for concordance between residents' self-perceived cultural dexterity skills and patients' perceptions of their skills. We hypothesized that residents would rate their skills in cultural dexterity higher than patients would perceive those skills.

METHODS

Prior to the implementation of the curriculum, surgical residents at 5 academic medical centers completed a self-assessment of their skills in culturally dexterous patient care using a modified version of the Cross-Cultural Care Survey. Randomly selected surgical inpatients at these centers completed a similar survey about the quality of culturally dexterous care provided by a surgery resident on their service. Likert scale responses for both assessments were classified as high (agree/strongly agree) or low (neutral/disagree/strongly disagree) competency. Resident and patient ratings of cultural dexterity were compared. Assessments were considered dexterous if 75% of responses were in the high category. Univariate and multivariate analysis was conducted using STATA 16.

RESULTS

A total of 179 residents from 5 surgical residency programs completed self-assessments prior to receiving the PACTS curriculum, including 88 (49.2%) women and 97 (54.2%) junior residents (PGY 1-2s), of whom 54.7% were White, 19% were Asian, and 8.9% were Black/African American. A total of 494 patients with an average age of 55.1 years were surveyed, of whom 238 (48.2%) were female and 320 (64.8%) were White. Fifty percent of residents viewed themselves as culturally dexterous, while 57% of patients reported receiving culturally dexterous care; this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.09). Residents who perceived themselves to be culturally dexterous were more likely to self-identify as non-White as compared to White (p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, White patients were more likely to report highly dexterous care, whereas Black patients were more likely to report poorly dexterous care (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

At baseline, half of patients reported receiving culturally dexterous care from surgical residents at 5 academic medical centers in the United States. This was consistent with residents' self-assessment of their cultural dexterity skills. White patients were more likely to report receiving culturally dexterous care as compared to non-White patients. Non-White residents were more likely to feel confident in their cultural dexterity skills. A novel curriculum has been designed to improve these interactions between patients and surgical residents.

Risk of complication at the time of laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prediction model built from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database

BACKGROUND

Although laparoscopic hysterectomy is well established as a favorable mode of hysterectomy owing to decreased perioperative complications, there is still room for improvement in quality of care. Previous studies have described laparoscopic hysterectomy risk, but there is currently no tool for predicting risk of complication at the time of laparoscopic hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to create a prediction model for complications at the time of laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign conditions.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study that included patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications between 2014 and 2017 in US hospitals contributing to the American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Data about patient baseline characteristics, perioperative complications (intraoperative complications, readmission, reoperation, need for transfusion, operative time greater than 4 hours, or postoperative medical complication), and uterine weight at the time of pathologic examination were collected retrospectively. Postoperative uterine weight was used as a proxy for preoperative uterine weight estimate. The sample was randomly divided into 2 patient populations, one for deriving the model and the other to validate the model.

RESULTS

A total of 33,123 women met the inclusion criteria. The rate of composite complication was 14.1%. Complication rates were similar in the derivation and validation cohorts (14.1% [2306 of 14,051] vs 13.9% [2289 of 14,107], P=.7207). The logistic regression risk prediction tool for hysterectomy complication identified 7 variables predictive of complication: history of laparotomy (21% increased odds of complication), age (2% increased odds of complication per year of life), body mass index (0.2% increased odds of complication per each unit increase in body mass index), parity (7% increased odds of complication per delivery), race (when compared with white women, black women had 34% increased odds and women of other races had 18% increased odds of complication), and American Society of Anesthesiologists score (when compared with American Society of Anesthesiologists 1, American Society of Anesthesiologists 2 had 31% increased odds, American Society of Anesthesiologists 3 had 62% increased odds, and American Society of Anesthesiologists 4 had 172% increased odds of complication). Predicted preoperative uterine weight also had a statistically significant nonlinear relationship with odds of complication. The c-statistics for the derivation and validation cohorts were 0.62 and 0.62, respectively. The model is well calibrated for women at all levels of risk.

CONCLUSION

The laparoscopic hysterectomy complication predictor model is a tool for predicting complications in patients planning to undergo hysterectomy.

Perioperative outcomes and disparities in utilization of sentinel lymph node biopsy in minimally invasive staging of endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess the emergence of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for disparities in utilization, and impacts on perioperative outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of the National Cancer Database, selecting for patients with T1NxM0 endometrial cancer undergoing minimally invasive surgical staging from 2012 to 2016. Disparities in SLNB utilization were described. Propensity matching was performed. Association of SLNB with perioperative outcomes was assessed with logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 67,365 patients, 6356 (9.4%) underwent SLNB, increasing from 2.8% to 16.3% from 2012 to 2016. Disparities were identified within race (7.0% Black, 9.4% non-Black), ethnicity (8.3% Hispanic, 9.5% non-Hispanic), insurance (6.0% uninsured, 9.5% insured), county density (3.7% rural, 9.8% metro), and income (7.0% bottom-quartile, 11.8% top-quartile). Risk of conversion to open surgery was lower with SLNB alone (1.03%) or SLNB followed by LND (1.40%), versus upfront LND (2.80%). SLNB was associated with reduced risk of conversion to open surgery in Intention-To-Treat (SLNB+/-LND vs. upfront LND; OR_ITT = 0.53; 95%CI 0.39-0.72) and Per-Protocol (PP; SLNB alone vs. upfront LND or SLNB+LND; OR_PP = 0.49; 95%CI 0.32-0.75) comparisons. SLNB was also associated with lower risk of length of stay >1 day (overall rate 6.3%; OR_ITT = 0.51; 95%CI 0.40-0.64; OR_PP = 0.39; 95%CI 0.28-0.55), and unplanned readmission (overall rate 2.3%; OR_PP = 0.52; 95%CI 0.33-0.81). There were no deaths within 90 days among 1370 SLNB alone cases, versus 2/1294 (0.15%) for SLNB+LND, and 123/28,828 (0.41%) for upfront LND.

CONCLUSION

We identified significant disparities in the utilization of SLNB, as well as evidence that this less-invasive technique is associated with lower rates of certain perioperative complications. Equitable access to this emerging technique could lessen disparate outcomes.

Examining Inequities Associated With Changes in Obstetric and Gynecologic Care Delivery During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a public health emergency requiring significant changes in obstetric and gynecologic health care delivery to minimize the risk of transmission to healthy patients and health care workers. Although these changes are necessary, they will differentially affect patients in a way that highlights and exacerbates existing inequities in health care access and outcomes. Socially vulnerable groups are already disproportionately affected by COVID-19 infection and more likely to experience severe morbidity and mortality. Some reasons for this include a limited ability to practice risk-reducing behaviors such as physical distancing, higher prevalence of chronic medical conditions, and less access to medical care. Additionally, the structural changes now taking place in health care delivery have negatively affected the ability of socially vulnerable groups to obtain necessary obstetric and gynecologic care, which may lead to poorer outcomes. As physician-leaders enact new policies to respond to the COVID-19 public health crisis, it is important to consider the potential for exacerbating existing health inequities and to be proactive in creating policies that promote equity.

Racial Disparities in Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Indications Within an Integrated Health Care System

This cross-sectional study examines racial disparities in the route of hysterectomy for benign indications within an integrated health care system in the United States.

National trends in inpatient endometriosis admissions: Patients, procedures and outcomes, 2006-2015

INTRODUCTION

Despite guidance towards minimally invasive, outpatient procedures for endometriosis, many patients nonetheless receive inpatient care. Our objective was to assess trends in patient and hospital characteristics, surgical complications and hospital charges for women with an endometriosis-related inpatient admission in the United States.

METHODS

We conducted a pooled cross-sectional analysis of Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample data. Visits were stratified into three time-period-defined cohorts (2006-2007, 2010-2011, and 2014 through the first three quarters of 2015). Visits were included if the patient was aged 18-49 years and the primary diagnosis code was for endometriosis (International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision code 617.xx). We evaluated counts of inpatient admissions and rates of patient and hospital characteristics.

RESULTS

The number of inpatient admissions with a primary diagnosis code for endometriosis decreased by 72.8% from 2006 to 2015. At the same time, among those admitted for inpatient care for endometriosis, the proportions who had Medicaid insurance and multiple documented comorbidities increased. From 2006 to 2015, mean total hospital charges increased by 75% to $39,662 in 2015 US dollars, although average length of stay increased by <1 day.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of inpatient admissions with a primary diagnosis of endometriosis decreased over the past decade, while surgical complications and associated hospital charges increased. The share of patients with multiple comorbidities increased and an increasing proportion of inpatient endometriosis admissions were covered by Medicaid and occurred at urban teaching hospitals. These findings suggest a demographic shift in patients receiving inpatient care for endometriosis towards more complex, vulnerable patients.

Racial/Ethnic Disparities/Differences in Hysterectomy Route in Women Likely Eligible for Minimally Invasive Surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Evaluate racial/ethnic variation in hysterectomy surgical route in women likely eligible for minimally invasive hysterectomy.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Multistate including Colorado, Florida, Maryland, New Jersey, and New York.

PATIENTS

Women aged ≥18 years without diagnoses of leiomyomas, obesity, or previous abdominopelvic surgery who underwent hysterectomy for benign conditions from the State Inpatient and Ambulatory Surgery Databases, 2010-2014.

INTERVENTIONS

None. Primary exposure is race/ethnicity.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Racial/ethnic variation in annual hysterectomy rates and surgical route. To calculate hysterectomy rates per 100 000 women/year, denominators were adjusted for the proportion of women with previous hysterectomy. A marginal structural log binomial regression model was used to estimate adjusted standardized prevalence ratios (aPRs) for vaginal or laparoscopic vs abdominal hysterectomy, controlling for clustering within hospitals. In addition, hospitals were stratified into quintiles to examine surgical route in hospitals that serve a higher vs lower proportion of African American patients. A total of 133 082 adult women underwent hysterectomy for benign conditions from 2010 to 2014. Annual laparoscopic rates increased more slowly for African Americans (1.6-fold) than for whites (1.8-fold) and Hispanics (1.9-fold). African American and Hispanic women were less likely to undergo vaginal (aPR = 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-0.96 and aPR = 0.95; 95% CI 0.93-0.97, respectively) and laparoscopic hysterectomy (aPR = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87-0.94 and aPR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92-0.98, respectively) than white women; Asian/Pacific Islander women were less likely to undergo vaginal hysterectomy (aPR = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.81-0.96). Hospitals serving a higher proportion of African American persons performed more abdominal and fewer vaginal procedures across all groups, and more racial/ethnic minority women sought care at those hospitals than white women.

CONCLUSION

African American, Hispanic, and Asian/Pacific Islander women eligible for minimally invasive hysterectomy were more likely than white women to receive abdominal hysterectomy. The proportion of all women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy was highest at hospitals serving higher proportions of African American persons. This difference in treatment type can lead to disparities in outcomes, in part owing to their association with complications.