101
|
Kearns MC, D'Inverno AS, Reidy DE. The Association Between Gender Inequality and Sexual Violence in the U.S. Am J Prev Med 2020; 58:12-20. [PMID: 31761512 PMCID: PMC7810166 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.08.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Revised: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 08/22/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Few societal-level factors are established as risk or protective factors for sexual violence. Traditional gender norms and gender inequality are linked to sexual violence, but much of this research was conducted internationally or is becoming outdated and may not reflect current norms in the U.S. This study expands on previously published research by examining gender inequality's association with state-level sexual violence. METHODS Using state-level prevalence estimates published in the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey 2010-2012 State Report and the Gender Inequality Index, Pearson correlations were examined to investigate the relationship between state-level gender inequality and lifetime victimization for various types of sexual violence among U.S. female and male adults. The analysis was conducted in 2019. RESULTS Findings indicate that states with a high degree of gender inequality also report higher prevalence estimates among women for rape using physical force. Gender inequality was also negatively correlated with noncontact unwanted sexual experiences among women and men. In addition, an exploratory analysis of the relationship between individual indicators of gender inequality and violence outcomes suggest that the adolescent birth rate, female government representation, and labor force participation demonstrate an association with certain state-level violence outcomes, although the patterns were inconsistent. CONCLUSIONS Although this study relied on cross-sectional data, collectively, these findings suggest that gender inequality may represent an important societal-level factor associated with sexual violence among women and men. However, this relationship appears complex and requires further research. These findings have potential to inform population-level violence prevention approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan C Kearns
- Division of Violence Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
| | | | - Dennis E Reidy
- School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
102
|
Peterson C, Xu L, Florence C. Average medical cost of fatal and non-fatal injuries by type in the USA. Inj Prev 2019; 27:24-33. [PMID: 31888976 DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2019] [Revised: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 11/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the average medical care cost of fatal and non-fatal injuries in the USA comprehensively by injury type. METHODS The attributable cost of injuries was estimated by mechanism (eg, fall), intent (eg, unintentional), body region (eg, head and neck) and nature of injury (eg, fracture) among patients injured from 1 October 2014 to 30 September 2015. The cost of fatal injuries was the multivariable regression-adjusted average among patients who died in hospital emergency departments (EDs) or inpatient settings as reported in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Emergency Department Sample and National Inpatient Sample, controlling for demographic (eg, age), clinical (eg, comorbidities) and health insurance (eg, Medicaid) factors. The 1-year attributable cost of non-fatal injuries was assessed among patients with ED-treated injuries using MarketScan medical claims data. Multivariable regression models compared total medical payments (inpatient, outpatient, drugs) among non-fatal injury patients versus matched controls during the year following injury patients' ED visit, controlling for demographic, clinical and insurance factors. All costs are 2015 US dollars. RESULTS The average medical cost of all fatal injuries was approximately $6880 and $41 570 per ED-based and hospital-based patient, respectively (range by injury type: $4764-$10 289 and $31 912-$95 295). The average attributable 1-year cost of all non-fatal injuries per person initially treated in an ED was approximately $6620 (range by injury type: $1698-$80 172). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Injuries are costly and preventable. Accurate estimates of attributable medical care costs are important to monitor the economic burden of injuries and help to prioritise cost-effective public health prevention activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cora Peterson
- National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Likang Xu
- National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Curtis Florence
- National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
103
|
Short NA, Sullivan J, Soward A, Bollen KA, Liberzon I, Martin S, Rauch SAM, Bell K, Rossi C, Lechner M, Novak C, Witkemper K, Kessler RC, McLean SA. Protocol for the first large-scale emergency care-based longitudinal cohort study of recovery after sexual assault: the Women's Health Study. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e031087. [PMID: 31753875 PMCID: PMC6887008 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Worldwide, an estimated 10%-27% of women are sexually assaulted during their lifetime. Despite the enormity of sexual assault as a public health problem, to our knowledge, no large-scale prospective studies of experiences and recovery over time among women presenting for emergency care after sexual assault have been performed. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Women ≥18 years of age who present for emergency care within 72 hours of sexual assault to a network of treatment centres across the USA are approached for study participation. Blood DNA and RNA samples and brief questionnaire and medical record data are obtained from women providing initial consent. Full consent is obtained at initial 1 week follow-up to analyse blood sample data and to perform assessments at 1 week, 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year. These assessments include evaluation of survivor life history, current health and recovery and experiences with treatment providers, law enforcement and the legal system. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study is approved by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill's Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the IRB of each participating study site. We hope to present the results of this study to the scientific community at conferences and in peer-reviewed journals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole A Short
- Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, UNC-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jenyth Sullivan
- Department of Anesthesiology, UNC-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - April Soward
- Department of Anesthesiology, UNC-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kenneth A Bollen
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience and Department of Sociology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Israel Liberzon
- Department of Psychiatry, Texas A&M University System Health Science Center College of Medicine, Bryan, Texas, USA
| | - Sandra Martin
- Department of Anesthesiology, UNC-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sheila A M Rauch
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Kathy Bell
- Tulsa Forensic Nursing, Tulsa Police Department, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Catherine Rossi
- Forensic Nursing, Cone Health, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA
| | - Megan Lechner
- Forensic Nurse Examining Team, University of Colorado Health Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
| | - Carissa Novak
- Department of Anesthesiology, UNC-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kristen Witkemper
- Department of Anesthesiology, UNC-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ronald C Kessler
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Samuel A McLean
- Department of Anesthesiology, UNC-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
104
|
Oosterbaan V, Covers MLV, Bicanic IAE, Huntjens RJC, de Jongh A. Do early interventions prevent PTSD? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of early interventions after sexual assault. Eur J Psychotraumatol 2019; 10:1682932. [PMID: 31762949 PMCID: PMC6853210 DOI: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1682932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2019] [Revised: 09/30/2019] [Accepted: 10/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To review the safety and efficacy of early interventions after sexual assault in reducing or preventing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Method: Systematic searches were performed on studies (1980-2018) that examined the efficacy of interventions for PTSD within 3 months after sexual assault. Results: The review identified 7 studies (n = 350) with high risk of bias that investigated 5 interventions. Only two studies reported on safety. Contact with the authors of six studies provided no indications for the occurrence of adverse events. Two studies reported the efficacy using PTSD diagnosis as dependent variable but found no difference between groups. All studies reported on efficacy using PTSD severity as dependent variable. For the meta-analysis, 4 studies (n = 293) were included yielding significantly greater reductions of PTSD severity than standard care at 2 to 12 months follow-up (g = -0.23, 95% CI [-0.46, 0.00]), but not at 1 to 6 weeks post-intervention (g = -0.28, 95% CI [-0.57, 0.02]). The heterogeneity of the interventions precluded further analyses. Discussion: Findings suggest that early interventions can lead to durable effects on PTSD severity after sexual assault. However, due to limited availability of data, it is impossible to draw definite conclusions about safety and efficacy of early interventions, and their potential to prevent PTSD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veerle Oosterbaan
- National Psychotrauma Center for Children and Youth, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Milou L. V. Covers
- National Psychotrauma Center for Children and Youth, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Iva A. E. Bicanic
- National Psychotrauma Center for Children and Youth, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rafaële J. C. Huntjens
- Department of Experimental Psychotherapy & Psychopathology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ad de Jongh
- Department of Social Dentistry and Behavioral Sciences, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Psychotrauma Expertise Center (PSYTREC), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
- Institute of Health and Society, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
- Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
105
|
Brown SJ, Khasteganan N, Brown K, Hegarty K, Carter GJ, Tarzia L, Feder G, O'Doherty L. Psychosocial interventions for survivors of rape and sexual assault experienced during adulthood. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah J Brown
- Coventry University; Faculty of Health and Life Sciences; Priory Street Coventry UK CV1 5FB
- University of the Sunshine Coast; School of Law and Criminology; 90 Sippy Downs Drive Sippy Downs Queensland Australia 4556
| | - Nazanin Khasteganan
- Coventry University; Faculty of Health and Life Sciences; Priory Street Coventry UK CV1 5FB
| | - Katherine Brown
- Coventry University; Faculty of Health and Life Sciences; Priory Street Coventry UK CV1 5FB
| | - Kelsey Hegarty
- The University of Melbourne; Department of General Practice; 200 Berkeley Street Parkville Melbourne Australia 3010
- The Royal Women's Hospital; Victoria Australia
| | - Grace J Carter
- Coventry University; Faculty of Health and Life Sciences; Priory Street Coventry UK CV1 5FB
| | - Laura Tarzia
- The University of Melbourne; Department of General Practice; 200 Berkeley Street Parkville Melbourne Australia 3010
- The Royal Women's Hospital; Victoria Australia
| | - Gene Feder
- University of Bristol; Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School; Canynge Hall 39 Whatley Road Bristol UK BS8 2PS
| | - Lorna O'Doherty
- Coventry University; Faculty of Health and Life Sciences; Priory Street Coventry UK CV1 5FB
- The University of Melbourne; Department of General Practice; 200 Berkeley Street Parkville Melbourne Australia 3010
| |
Collapse
|
106
|
Gilmore AK, Davidson TM, Leone RM, Wray LB, Oesterle DW, Hahn CK, Flanagan JC, Gill-Hopple K, Acierno R. Usability Testing of a Mobile Health Intervention to Address Acute Care Needs after Sexual Assault. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:E3088. [PMID: 31450676 PMCID: PMC6747119 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16173088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Revised: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 08/21/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Sexual assault is associated with a range of poor mental health outcomes. To enhance access to care by this population, technology-based mental health interventions have been implemented in the emergency room; however, more accessible and easily disseminated interventions are needed. The aim of the present study was to test the usability of a mobile health intervention targeting alcohol and drug misuse, suicide prevention, posttraumatic stress symptoms, coping skills, and referral to formal assistance for individuals who have experienced sexual assault. Feedback on the usability of the intervention was collected from individuals who received a sexual assault medical forensic examination (n = 13), and feedback on the usability and likelihood of recommending the application was collected from community providers (n = 25). Thematic analysis was used to describe qualitative data. Content themes related to aesthetics, usability, barriers to resources, and likes/dislikes about the intervention arose from interviews following the intervention. Participants found the intervention to be user friendly and endorsed more likes than dislikes. Providers rated the intervention as being helpful and would recommend it to survivors of sexual assault. Findings suggest that the intervention is usable and fit for future effectiveness testing, filling an important gap in treatment for individuals who experience sexual assault.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda K Gilmore
- College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
| | - Tatiana M Davidson
- College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Ruschelle M Leone
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Lauren B Wray
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Daniel W Oesterle
- College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Christine K Hahn
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Julianne C Flanagan
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Kathleen Gill-Hopple
- Forensic Nursing Services, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Ron Acierno
- Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
107
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This article reviews recent evidence related to public health epidemiology and intervention for traumatic stress and PTSD. Recent evidence is presented regarding incidence of traumatic stress worldwide, as well as most frequent types of traumas, indicators of the public health burden of PTSD, and prevalence, predictors, and correlates of PTSD. Public health perspectives on intervention and treatment are delineated, and innovations in both psychosocial and psychopharmacological interventions are highlighted. RECENT FINDINGS PTSD has been associated with substantial medical and economic burden. Recent public health preventive innovations include integrated medical/behavioral health care, acute CBT and attention interventions, modifications to CBT protocols, use of novel and augmentative psychopharmacological agents, and use of technology. Recent research regarding the scope and impact of traumatic stress, as well as prevention strategies for PTSD, have resulted in an improved understanding of its impact and more effective public health interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Watson
- Department of Veterans Affairs (116D), National Center for PTSD, Executive Division, 215 N. Main ST, White River Junction, VT, 05009, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
108
|
Coker AL, Bush HM, Brancato CJ, Sprang G. Can the Impact of Interpersonal Violence on Current Health-Related Quality of Life Be Mitigated? J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2019; 28:1355-1367. [PMID: 30882265 DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Interpersonal violence continues to affect health long after violence has ended. This analysis investigated stress, support, and health behaviors as mediators potentially explaining persistent health impacts of violence. Methods: Using a cross-sectional analysis of 12,594 women "Wellness, Health & You" (WHY) participants, authors measured violence as intimate partner violence (IPV), sexual assaults (SA), and childhood abuse (CA) by recency (current, past as an adult, or child) and number of violence forms. Current health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) was defined using the most recent survey as physical and mental health limiting usual activities for at least 4 days in the past 30 days. Adjusted prevalence rate ratios (aPRRs) for violence and HR-QOL were obtained using multiple variable log binomial regression where each mediator was included in separate models with demographic attributes. Results: In this sample of middle-aged women, half (n = 6307) had ever experienced violence (38.3% IPV, 12.9% SA, and 24.6% CA) and 19.9% reported multiple forms. IPV, SA, and CA were each associated with poorer current HR-QOL, yet, WHY participants experiencing all three forms had a sixfold increased rate of poor mental HR-QOL (Model 1: aPRRs = 6.23 [95% confidence interval, 95% CI: 4.87-7.97]) versus no violence. Stress was the mediator associated with the greatest change in aPRRs (-34.7%; Model 2: aPRR = 4.07 [95% CI: 3.13-5.30]). When all mediators were included (Model 5: aPRR = 3.01 [95% CI: 2.29-3.96]), partial mediation was observed, evidenced by nonoverlapping CIs between Models 1 and 5. Conclusions: Of relevance for interventions are findings that current health impacts of past violence may be mitigated through reducing current stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann L Coker
- Center for Research on Violence Against Women, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Heather M Bush
- Center for Research on Violence Against Women, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.,Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Candace J Brancato
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Ginny Sprang
- Center for Research on Violence Against Women, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.,Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.,Center on Trauma and Children, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| |
Collapse
|
109
|
Gossec L, Strand V, Proudfoot C, Chen CI, Guillonneau S, Kimura T, van Hoogstraten H, Mangan E, Reaney M. Effects of Sarilumab on Rheumatoid Arthritis as Reported by Patients Using the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease Scale. J Rheumatol 2019; 46:1259-1267. [PMID: 30877216 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.180904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We evaluated the effect of sarilumab on patient-perceived impact of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using the 7-domain RA Impact of Disease (RAID) scale. METHODS Two phase III, randomized, controlled trials of sarilumab in patients with active, longstanding RA were analyzed: (1) sarilumab 150 mg and 200 mg every 2 weeks plus conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (+csDMARD) versus placebo + csDMARD [TARGET (NCT01709578)]; and (2) sarilumab 200 mg versus adalimumab (ADA) 40 mg monotherapy [MONARCH (NCT02332590)]. Least-squares mean (LSM) differences in RAID total score (range 0-10) and 7 key RA symptoms, including pain and fatigue (baseline to Weeks 12 and 24), were compared. "Responders" by RAID total score were defined by improvements from baseline ≥ minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and ≥ patient-acceptable symptom-state (PASS) at endpoint. RESULTS Sarilumab 150 mg and 200 mg + csDMARD were nominally superior (p < 0.05) versus placebo + csDMARD and 200 mg sarilumab versus ADA 40 mg in LSM differences for RAID total score at weeks 12 (-0.93 and -1.13; -0.49, respectively) and 24 (-0.75 and -1.01; -0.78), and all effects of RA (except functional impairment in MONARCH Week 12). Effects were greater in physical domains (e.g., pain) than mental domains (e.g., emotional well-being). More patients receiving sarilumab versus placebo or ADA reported improvements ≥ MCID and PASS in total RAID scores at both assessments. CONCLUSION Based on the RAID, sarilumab + csDMARD or as monotherapy reduced the effect of RA on patients' lives to a greater extent than placebo + csDMARD or ADA monotherapy. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01709578 and NCT02332590).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laure Gossec
- From the Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (UMRS 1136), GRC-UPMC 08 (EEMOIS); Rheumatology Department, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France; Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA; Sanofi, Guildford, UK; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, New York, USA; Sanofi, Paris, France; Sanofi, Bridgewater, New Jersey, USA.,L. Gossec, MD, PhD, Sorbonne Université and Rheumatology Department, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (UMRS 1136), GRC-UPMC 08 (EEMOIS); V. Strand, MD, Stanford University; C. Proudfoot, PhD, Novartis; C.I. Chen, MPH, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; S. Guillonneau, MSc, Sanofi; T. Kimura, MSc, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; H. van Hoogstraten, MD/PhD, Sanofi; E. Mangan, PhD, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; M. Reaney, MSc, formerly of Sanofi
| | - Vibeke Strand
- From the Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (UMRS 1136), GRC-UPMC 08 (EEMOIS); Rheumatology Department, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France; Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA; Sanofi, Guildford, UK; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, New York, USA; Sanofi, Paris, France; Sanofi, Bridgewater, New Jersey, USA.,L. Gossec, MD, PhD, Sorbonne Université and Rheumatology Department, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (UMRS 1136), GRC-UPMC 08 (EEMOIS); V. Strand, MD, Stanford University; C. Proudfoot, PhD, Novartis; C.I. Chen, MPH, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; S. Guillonneau, MSc, Sanofi; T. Kimura, MSc, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; H. van Hoogstraten, MD/PhD, Sanofi; E. Mangan, PhD, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; M. Reaney, MSc, formerly of Sanofi
| | - Clare Proudfoot
- From the Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (UMRS 1136), GRC-UPMC 08 (EEMOIS); Rheumatology Department, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France; Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA; Sanofi, Guildford, UK; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, New York, USA; Sanofi, Paris, France; Sanofi, Bridgewater, New Jersey, USA.,L. Gossec, MD, PhD, Sorbonne Université and Rheumatology Department, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (UMRS 1136), GRC-UPMC 08 (EEMOIS); V. Strand, MD, Stanford University; C. Proudfoot, PhD, Novartis; C.I. Chen, MPH, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; S. Guillonneau, MSc, Sanofi; T. Kimura, MSc, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; H. van Hoogstraten, MD/PhD, Sanofi; E. Mangan, PhD, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; M. Reaney, MSc, formerly of Sanofi
| | - Chieh-I Chen
- From the Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (UMRS 1136), GRC-UPMC 08 (EEMOIS); Rheumatology Department, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France; Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA; Sanofi, Guildford, UK; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, New York, USA; Sanofi, Paris, France; Sanofi, Bridgewater, New Jersey, USA.,L. Gossec, MD, PhD, Sorbonne Université and Rheumatology Department, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (UMRS 1136), GRC-UPMC 08 (EEMOIS); V. Strand, MD, Stanford University; C. Proudfoot, PhD, Novartis; C.I. Chen, MPH, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; S. Guillonneau, MSc, Sanofi; T. Kimura, MSc, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; H. van Hoogstraten, MD/PhD, Sanofi; E. Mangan, PhD, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; M. Reaney, MSc, formerly of Sanofi
| | - Sophie Guillonneau
- From the Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (UMRS 1136), GRC-UPMC 08 (EEMOIS); Rheumatology Department, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France; Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA; Sanofi, Guildford, UK; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, New York, USA; Sanofi, Paris, France; Sanofi, Bridgewater, New Jersey, USA.,L. Gossec, MD, PhD, Sorbonne Université and Rheumatology Department, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (UMRS 1136), GRC-UPMC 08 (EEMOIS); V. Strand, MD, Stanford University; C. Proudfoot, PhD, Novartis; C.I. Chen, MPH, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; S. Guillonneau, MSc, Sanofi; T. Kimura, MSc, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; H. van Hoogstraten, MD/PhD, Sanofi; E. Mangan, PhD, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; M. Reaney, MSc, formerly of Sanofi
| | - Toshio Kimura
- From the Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (UMRS 1136), GRC-UPMC 08 (EEMOIS); Rheumatology Department, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France; Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA; Sanofi, Guildford, UK; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, New York, USA; Sanofi, Paris, France; Sanofi, Bridgewater, New Jersey, USA.,L. Gossec, MD, PhD, Sorbonne Université and Rheumatology Department, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (UMRS 1136), GRC-UPMC 08 (EEMOIS); V. Strand, MD, Stanford University; C. Proudfoot, PhD, Novartis; C.I. Chen, MPH, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; S. Guillonneau, MSc, Sanofi; T. Kimura, MSc, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; H. van Hoogstraten, MD/PhD, Sanofi; E. Mangan, PhD, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; M. Reaney, MSc, formerly of Sanofi
| | - Hubert van Hoogstraten
- From the Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (UMRS 1136), GRC-UPMC 08 (EEMOIS); Rheumatology Department, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France; Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA; Sanofi, Guildford, UK; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, New York, USA; Sanofi, Paris, France; Sanofi, Bridgewater, New Jersey, USA.,L. Gossec, MD, PhD, Sorbonne Université and Rheumatology Department, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (UMRS 1136), GRC-UPMC 08 (EEMOIS); V. Strand, MD, Stanford University; C. Proudfoot, PhD, Novartis; C.I. Chen, MPH, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; S. Guillonneau, MSc, Sanofi; T. Kimura, MSc, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; H. van Hoogstraten, MD/PhD, Sanofi; E. Mangan, PhD, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; M. Reaney, MSc, formerly of Sanofi
| | - Erin Mangan
- From the Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (UMRS 1136), GRC-UPMC 08 (EEMOIS); Rheumatology Department, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France; Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA; Sanofi, Guildford, UK; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, New York, USA; Sanofi, Paris, France; Sanofi, Bridgewater, New Jersey, USA.,L. Gossec, MD, PhD, Sorbonne Université and Rheumatology Department, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (UMRS 1136), GRC-UPMC 08 (EEMOIS); V. Strand, MD, Stanford University; C. Proudfoot, PhD, Novartis; C.I. Chen, MPH, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; S. Guillonneau, MSc, Sanofi; T. Kimura, MSc, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; H. van Hoogstraten, MD/PhD, Sanofi; E. Mangan, PhD, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; M. Reaney, MSc, formerly of Sanofi
| | - Matthew Reaney
- From the Sorbonne Université, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (UMRS 1136), GRC-UPMC 08 (EEMOIS); Rheumatology Department, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France; Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA; Sanofi, Guildford, UK; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, New York, USA; Sanofi, Paris, France; Sanofi, Bridgewater, New Jersey, USA. .,L. Gossec, MD, PhD, Sorbonne Université and Rheumatology Department, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (UMRS 1136), GRC-UPMC 08 (EEMOIS); V. Strand, MD, Stanford University; C. Proudfoot, PhD, Novartis; C.I. Chen, MPH, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; S. Guillonneau, MSc, Sanofi; T. Kimura, MSc, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; H. van Hoogstraten, MD/PhD, Sanofi; E. Mangan, PhD, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.; M. Reaney, MSc, formerly of Sanofi.
| |
Collapse
|
110
|
|
111
|
Cunningham S, Goff C, Bagby RM, Stewart JG, Larocque C, Mazurka R, Ravindran A, Harkness KL. Maternal- versus paternal-perpetrated maltreatment and risk for sexual and peer bullying revictimization in young women with depression. CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT 2019; 89:111-121. [PMID: 30658172 DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.12.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2018] [Revised: 12/03/2018] [Accepted: 12/20/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Childhood maltreatment is one of the strongest predictors of sexual and peer bullying re-victimization. However, it is not clear which types of maltreatment are associated with the greatest risk. OBJECTIVE The current study examined the differential relations of maternal- versus paternal-perpetrated emotional maltreatment, neglect, and physical maltreatment, as well as sexual maltreatment, to sexual victimization and peer bullying victimization outside the home. It was hypothesized that paternal-perpetrated emotional maltreatment would be the strongest predictor of later sexual and peer bullying victimization, and that sexual maltreatment would predict sexual re-victimization. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING Participants included data from 263 adolescent and young adult women who had previously taken part in one of three larger studies conducted in an academic research setting investigating the relation between stress and depression. All participants had been recruited from the wider community or clinician referral and met criteria for a unipolar depressive disorder. METHODS Psychiatric diagnoses were assessed with a structured diagnostic interview. Childhood maltreatment and victimization were assessed retrospectively with a semi-structured contextual interview that includes standardized ratings. RESULTS Paternal-perpetrated emotional abuse was the only maltreatment type that was independently associated with sexual (OR = 3.09, p = .004) and peer bullying (OR = 1.41, p = .05) re-victimization over other forms of maltreatment and indicators of depression severity. CONCLUSIONS These findings provide an important foundation for future research examining the mechanisms driving the relation between father's hostility, criticism, and rejection and daughters' revictimization that can ultimately provide targets for prevention in girls at highest risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Cunningham
- Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada.
| | - Caeleb Goff
- Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada.
| | - R Michael Bagby
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, 100 Queen St. W., Toronto, Ontario, M6J 1H4, Canada.
| | - Jeremy G Stewart
- Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada.
| | - Cherie Larocque
- Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada.
| | - Raegan Mazurka
- Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada.
| | - Arun Ravindran
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, 100 Queen St. W., Toronto, Ontario, M6J 1H4, Canada.
| | - Kate L Harkness
- Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
112
|
D’Inverno AS, Kearns MC, Reidy DE. Introduction to the Special Issue: The Role of Public Policies in Preventing IPV, TDV, and SV. JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE 2018; 33:3259-3266. [PMID: 30253724 PMCID: PMC6456897 DOI: 10.1177/0886260518798360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Megan C. Kearns
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Dennis E. Reidy
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
113
|
DeLong SM, Graham LM, Magee EP, Treves-Kagan S, Gray CL, McClay AM, Zarnick SM, Kupper LL, Macy RJ, Ashley OS, Pettifor A, Moracco KE, Martin SL. Starting the Conversation: Are Campus Sexual Assault Policies Related to the Prevalence of Campus Sexual Assault? JOURNAL OF INTERPERSONAL VIOLENCE 2018; 33:3315-3343. [PMID: 30253720 DOI: 10.1177/0886260518798352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
One goal of university campus sexual assault (CSA) policies is to help prevent CSA. Federal guidance in the 2014 White House Task Force to Protect Students From Sexual Assault Checklist for Campus Sexual Misconduct Policies suggests 10 elements for inclusion in CSA policies (e.g., Policy Introduction, Grievance/Adjudication), and outlines policy topics to be included within each element (Policy Introduction includes two topics: statement of prohibition against sex discrimination including sexual misconduct and statement of commitment to address sexual misconduct). However, no research has examined whether CSA policies impact CSA prevalence. To begin addressing this gap, we studied 24 universities participating in the 2015 Association of American Universities Campus Climate Survey on Sexual Assault and Sexual Misconduct. We linked 2014-2015 data from these universities' CSA policies and their CSA prevalence findings from the 2015 Association of American Universities (AAU) survey. To test whether the comprehensiveness of schools' CSA policies was related to schools' CSA prevalence, we examined the degree to which the CSA policies included recommended policy content from the aforementioned Checklist. Policies were characterized as more comprehensive if they included greater numbers of Checklist topics. We then correlated the number of topics within the policies with school-level CSA prevalence. We also explored whether there was lower CSA prevalence among schools with policies containing particular topics. Results suggested that greater comprehensiveness of schools' entire CSA policies was negatively correlated with CSA prevalence; however, these findings did not approach statistical significance. The number of negative correlations observed between schools' CSA policy elements and CSA prevalence among undergraduate women was greater than expected by chance alone, suggesting a possible connection between comprehensive CSA policies and CSA prevalence. Schools with policies that included a topic on their sexual assault response team had the lowest CSA prevalence for both women and men, and schools that included topics describing grievance/adjudication procedures had lower CSA prevalence. This study provides a novel examination of CSA and could inform needed research related to the impact of CSA policies on CSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Erin P Magee
- 1 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Rebecca J Macy
- 1 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
114
|
Peterson C, Kearns MC, McIntosh WL, Estefan LF, Nicolaidis C, McCollister KE, Gordon A, Florence C. Lifetime Economic Burden of Intimate Partner Violence Among U.S. Adults. Am J Prev Med 2018; 55:433-444. [PMID: 30166082 PMCID: PMC6161830 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 188] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2018] [Revised: 03/04/2018] [Accepted: 04/17/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study estimated the U.S. lifetime per-victim cost and economic burden of intimate partner violence. METHODS Data from previous studies were combined with 2012 U.S. National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey data in a mathematical model. Intimate partner violence was defined as contact sexual violence, physical violence, or stalking victimization with related impact (e.g., missed work days). Costs included attributable impaired health, lost productivity, and criminal justice costs from the societal perspective. Mean age at first victimization was assessed as 25 years. Future costs were discounted by 3%. The main outcome measures were the mean per-victim (female and male) and total population (or economic burden) lifetime cost of intimate partner violence. Secondary outcome measures were marginal outcome probabilities among victims (e.g., anxiety disorder) and associated costs. Analysis was conducted in 2017. RESULTS The estimated intimate partner violence lifetime cost was $103,767 per female victim and $23,414 per male victim, or a population economic burden of nearly $3.6 trillion (2014 US$) over victims' lifetimes, based on 43 million U.S. adults with victimization history. This estimate included $2.1 trillion (59% of total) in medical costs, $1.3 trillion (37%) in lost productivity among victims and perpetrators, $73 billion (2%) in criminal justice activities, and $62 billion (2%) in other costs, including victim property loss or damage. Government sources pay an estimated $1.3 trillion (37%) of the lifetime economic burden. CONCLUSIONS Preventing intimate partner violence is possible and could avoid substantial costs. These findings can inform the potential benefit of prioritizing prevention, as well as evaluation of implemented prevention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cora Peterson
- National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
| | - Megan C Kearns
- National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Wendy LiKamWa McIntosh
- National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Lianne Fuino Estefan
- National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Kathryn E McCollister
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Amy Gordon
- School of Social Work, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon; and
| | - Curtis Florence
- National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
115
|
|
116
|
Potter S, Howard R, Murphy S, Moynihan MM. Long-term impacts of college sexual assaults on women survivors' educational and career attainments. JOURNAL OF AMERICAN COLLEGE HEALTH : J OF ACH 2018; 66:496-507. [PMID: 29447618 DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1440574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Revised: 12/21/2017] [Accepted: 02/09/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the well-documented mental and physical health problems suffered by undergraduate women sexually assaulted while on campus with an exploration of how the trauma impacts a survivor's lifetime education trajectory and career attainment. PARTICIPANTS In November and December 2015, researchers recruited US participants using an online crowdsourcing tool and a Listserv for sexual violence prevention and response professionals. METHODS Of 316 women who completed initial screening, 89 qualified to complete a Qualtrics survey. Eighty-one participants completed the online survey, and 32 participated in phone interviews. RESULTS Ninety-one percent of the participants reported health problems related to the assault that they attributed to difficulties they faced in their attainment of their education and career goals. CONCLUSIONS The findings suggest the importance of simultaneously examining the effects of human capital losses and mental and physical health problems attributed to the costly public health problem of campus sexual assault.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharyn Potter
- a Prevention Innovations Research Center, University of New Hampshire , Durham , New Hampshire , USA
| | - Rebecca Howard
- a Prevention Innovations Research Center, University of New Hampshire , Durham , New Hampshire , USA
| | - Sharon Murphy
- a Prevention Innovations Research Center, University of New Hampshire , Durham , New Hampshire , USA
| | - Mary M Moynihan
- a Prevention Innovations Research Center, University of New Hampshire , Durham , New Hampshire , USA
| |
Collapse
|
117
|
Peterson C, Liu Y, Kresnow MJ, Florence C, Merrick MT, DeGue S, Lokey CN. Short-term Lost Productivity per Victim: Intimate Partner Violence, Sexual Violence, or Stalking. Am J Prev Med 2018; 55:106-110. [PMID: 29776781 PMCID: PMC6014928 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2017] [Revised: 02/12/2018] [Accepted: 03/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study is to estimate victims' lifetime short-term lost productivity because of intimate partner violence, sexual violence, or stalking. METHODS U.S. nationally representative data from the 2012 National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey were used to estimate a regression-adjusted average per victim (female and male) and total population number of cumulative short-term lost work and school days (or lost productivity) because of victimizations over victims' lifetimes. Victims' lost productivity was valued using a U.S. daily production estimate. Analysis was conducted in 2017. RESULTS Non-institutionalized adults with some lifetime exposure to intimate partner violence, sexual violence, or stalking (n=6,718 respondents; survey-weighted n=130,795,789) reported nearly 741 million lost productive days because of victimizations by an average of 2.5 perpetrators per victim. The adjusted per victim average was 4.9 (95% CI=3.9, 5.9) days, controlling for victim, perpetrator, and violence type factors. The estimated societal cost of this short-term lost productivity was $730 per victim, or $110 billion across the lifetimes of all victims (2016 USD). Factors associated with victims having a higher number of lost days included a higher number of perpetrators and being female, as well as sexual violence, physical violence, or stalking victimization by an intimate partner perpetrator, stalking victimization by an acquaintance perpetrator, and sexual violence or stalking victimization by a family member perpetrator. CONCLUSIONS Short-term lost productivity represents a minimum economic valuation of the immediate negative effects of intimate partner violence, sexual violence, and stalking. Victims' lost productivity affects family members, colleagues, and employers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cora Peterson
- National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
| | - Yang Liu
- National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Marcie-Jo Kresnow
- National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Curtis Florence
- National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Melissa T Merrick
- National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Sarah DeGue
- National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Colby N Lokey
- National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
118
|
Peterson C, Foster SL, Xu L, Hartnett WM, Florence C, Haileyesus T. US campus fraternities and sororities and the young adult injury burden. JOURNAL OF AMERICAN COLLEGE HEALTH : J OF ACH 2018; 66:340-349. [PMID: 29405869 PMCID: PMC6002919 DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1431899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether the presence of fraternities and sororities was associated with a higher local injury rate among undergraduate-age youth. METHODS In 2016 we compared the rate of 2010-2013 youth (18-24 years) emergency department (ED) visits for injuries in Hospital Service Areas (HSA) with and without fraternities and sororities. ED visits were identified in the State Emergency Department Database (n=1,560 hospitals, 1,080 HSAs, 16 states). US Census Bureau and National Center for Education Statistics sources identified HSA population and campus (n=659) characteristics. A proprietary database identified campuses with fraternities and sororities (n=287). ED visits explicitly linked to fraternities and sororities in the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System-All Injury Program were used to identify injury causes for sub-group analysis. RESULTS HSAs serving campuses with fraternities and sororities had lower age 18-24 injury rates for all causes except firearm injuries (no difference). CONCLUSIONS Fraternities and sororities were not associated with a higher injury rate at the population level among undergraduate-age youth. A major limitation is not being able to observe campus health services utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cora Peterson
- National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Stephanie L. Foster
- Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, (ATSDR), Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Likang Xu
- National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - William M. Hartnett
- Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, (ATSDR), Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Curtis Florence
- National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Tadesse Haileyesus
- National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
119
|
Abstract
This response to Katz's commentary is based on our team's experiences and findings in bystander intervention design and evaluation among male and female adolescents in several high school settings. Three themes emerged in reflecting on "what worked" in our large evaluation in light of Katz's commentary. First, our field needs data from multiple rigorous bystander intervention evaluations. Second, bystander interventions must be acceptable to the population receiving the intervention. Third, engaging all adolescent and young adults in prevention independent of sex or sexual orientation is essential to reduce sexual violence including harassment and bullying.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann L Coker
- 1 University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
120
|
Kimerling R. No Mission Too Difficult: Responding to Military Sexual Assault. Am J Public Health 2017; 107:642-644. [PMID: 28398788 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2017.303731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Kimerling
- Rachel Kimerling is with the National Center for PTSD, Dissemination and Training Division and the Center for Innovation to Implementation at the VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
| |
Collapse
|