Use of irbesartan to maintain sinus rhythm in patients with long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation: a prospective and randomized study

The effect of pretreatment with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers on cardioversion success and acute recurrence of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAS) may be activated during atrial fibrillation (AF). It is unclear whether RAS inhibition may facilitate cardioversion from AF and may prevent acute recurrence of AF (ARAF). We thus investigated the effect of pretreatment with RAS blockers on cardioversion success and ARAF in patients with AF scheduled for elective cardioversion.

METHODS

This observational study included 356 patients with AF undergoing elective pharmacological or electrical cardioversion. Of these patients, 135 were not included based on exclusion criteria and the remaining 221 patients were divided into RAS group (n = 116, 69 male) or non-RAS group (n = 105, 58 male) based on precardioversion use of any RAS blocker.

RESULTS

Hypertension, coronary heart disease and heart failure were more frequent in the RAS group. Cardioversion from AF was more successful in the RAS group than in the non-RAS group (%92 vs. %82, p = 0.026). The rate of ARAF was lower in RAS group compared with that in non-RAS group (17% vs. 31%, p = 0.026). In multivariate analysis, pretreatment with RAS blockers in addition to shock number and enlarged left atrium, independently predicted ARAF (OR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.15-0.75, p = 0.008). Independent predictors of cardioversion success were shock number and left atrial dilatation, but not use of RAS blocker.

CONCLUSION

Precardioversion use of RAS blockers may reduce ARAF following successful cardioversion of AF, but did not improve electrical cardioversion.

Atrial fibrillation and heart failure in cardiology practice: reciprocal impact and combined management from the perspective of atrial fibrillation: results of the Euro Heart Survey on atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to identify shortcomings in the management of patients with both atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF).

BACKGROUND

AF and HF often coincide in cardiology practice, and they are known to worsen each other's prognosis, but little is known about the quality of care of this combination.

METHODS

In the observational Euro Heart Survey on AF, 5,333 AF patients were enrolled in 182 centers across 35 European Society of Cardiology member countries in 2003 and 2004. A follow-up survey was performed after 1 year.

RESULTS

At baseline, 1,816 patients (34%) had HF. Recommended therapy for HF with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) with a beta-blocker and either an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blocker was prescribed in 40% of HF patients, while 29% received the recommended drug therapy for both LVSD-HF and AF, consisting of the combination of a beta-blocker, either ACEI or angiotensin II receptor blocker, and oral anticoagulation. Rate control was insufficient with 40% of all HF patients with permanent AF having a heart rate < or =80 beats/min. In the total cohort, HF patients had a higher risk for mortality (9.5% vs. 3.3%; p < 0.001), (progression of) HF (24.8% vs. 5.0%; p < 0.001), and AF progression (35% vs. 19%; p < 0.001) during 1-year follow-up. Of all recommended drugs for AF and LVSD-HF, only ACEI prescription was associated with improved survival during 1-year follow-up (odds ratio: 0.51 [95% confidence interval: 0.31 to 0.85]; p = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

The prescription rate of guideline-recommended drug therapy for AF and LVSD-HF is low. Randomized controlled trials targeting this highly prevalent subgroup with AF and HF are warranted.

Atrial Remodeling And Atrial Fibrillation: Mechanistic Interactions And Clinical Implications

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice. The prevalence of AF increases dramatically with age and is seen in as high as 9% of individuals by the age of 80 years. In high-risk patients, the thromboembolic stroke risk can be as high as 9% per year and is associated with a 2-fold increase in mortality. Although the pathophysiological mechanism underlying the genesis of AF has been the focus of many studies, it remains only partially understood. Conventional theories focused on the presence of multiple re-entrant circuits originating in the atria that are asynchronous and conducted at various velocities through tissues with various refractory periods. Recently, rapidly firing atrial activity in the muscular sleeves at the pulmonary veins ostia or inside the pulmonary veins have been described as potential mechanism,. AF results from a complex interaction between various initiating triggers and development of abnormal atrial tissue substrate. The development of AF leads to structural and electrical changes in the atria, a process known as remodeling. To have effective surgical or catheter ablation of AF good understanding of the possible mechanism(s) is crucial.Once initiated, AF alters atrial electrical and structural properties that promote its maintenance and recurrence. The role of atrial remodeling (AR) in the development and maintenance of AF has been the subject of many animal and human studies over the past 10-15 years. This review will discuss the mechanisms of AR, the structural, electrophysiologic, and neurohormonal changes associated with AR and it is role in initiating and maintaining AF. We will also discuss briefly the role of inflammation in AR and AF initiation and maintenance, as well as, the possible therapeutic interventions to prevent AR, and hence AF, based on the current understanding of the interaction between AF and AR.

Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor versus valsartan on cellular signaling events in heart transplant

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) provide similar biologic effects in model systems and similar clinical impacts in humans. The changes in the cardiac angiotensin system signaling pathways in the human heart in response to ACE inhibitors versus ARBs have been incompletely studied.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of ACE inhibitors versus valsartan on the angiotensin II signal transduction pathways in the transplanted human heart.

METHODS

Twenty-seven stable cardiac transplant recipients were randomized to remain on ACE inhibitor therapy (n = 8) or to receive valsartan (n = 19). Two additional endomyocardial biopsy samples were obtained at baseline and after 9 months of therapy. The expression of cardiac angiotensin type I and II receptors and atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The expression and phosphorylation levels of selected signal transduction pathways were analyzed by immunoblotting.

RESULTS

The mean dose of valsartan was 114 +/- 41 mg/day. The use of valsartan resulted in a similar impact on blood pressure and biochemistry profile. There were no significant changes in the expression of angiotensin type I and II receptors and ANF with valsartan. Similarly, no significant changes in the expression and phosphorylation of Jun N-terminal kinase, extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2, and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases or AKT, and mammalian target of rapamycin was observed in the valsartan-treated group.

CONCLUSIONS

Valsartan use is associated with similar clinical and molecular cardiac effects as ACE inhibitor therapy in stable long-term cardiac transplant recipients.

Valsartan for prevention of recurrent atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, and no current therapy is ideal for control of this condition. Experimental studies suggest that angiotensin II-receptor blockers (ARBs) can influence atrial remodeling, and some clinical studies suggest that they may prevent atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

We conducted a large, randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial to test whether the ARB valsartan could reduce the recurrence of atrial fibrillation. We enrolled patients who were in sinus rhythm but had had either two or more documented episodes of atrial fibrillation in the previous 6 months or successful cardioversion for atrial fibrillation in the previous 2 weeks. To be eligible, patients also had to have underlying cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or left atrial enlargement. Patients were randomly assigned to receive valsartan or placebo. The two primary end points were the time to a first recurrence of atrial fibrillation and the proportion of patients who had more than one recurrence of atrial fibrillation over the course of 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 1442 patients were enrolled in the study. Atrial fibrillation recurred in 371 of the 722 patients (51.4%) in the valsartan group, as compared with 375 of 720 (52.1%) in the placebo group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.97; 96% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 1.14; P=0.73). More than one episode of atrial fibrillation occurred in 194 of 722 patients (26.9%) in the valsartan group and in 201 of 720 (27.9%) in the placebo group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.89; 99% CI, 0.64 to 1.23; P=0.34). The results were similar in all predefined subgroups of patients, including those who were not receiving angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with valsartan was not associated with a reduction in the incidence of recurrent atrial fibrillation. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00376272.)

Association between the use of non-antiarrhythmic drugs and postoperative atrial fibrillation

PURPOSE

To evaluate the association between statins, N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

A total of 590 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass and/or valve surgery were studied. An AF episode lasting >5 min during hospitalization was accepted as endpoint.

RESULTS

AF rate was 18% (n=106). Multivariable positive predictors of AF included age ≥ 65, left atrial diameter ≥ 45 mm, cross clamp time; negative predictors included use of left internal mammarian artery, NAC, and ACEIs or ARBs.

CONCLUSIONS

ACEIs or ARBs and NAC is associated with low incidence of postoperative AF, however, this association was not found with statin or combined use these agents.

Significance of genetic polymorphisms of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system in cardiovascular and renal disease

The angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) is a component of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS). The RAAS – involved primarily in blood pressure and sodium homeostasis – is activated in many renal and cardiovascular diseases, and therapy with ACE inhibitors and other blockers of the RAAS has proven to be clinically beneficial. Plasma and tissue levels of ACE are at least partially determined by a genetic polymorphism based on the presence (insertion [I]) or absence (deletion [D]) of a 287 base pair element in intron 16. In particular Asian subjects with the DD genotype (and increased ACE activity) have been reported to be at higher risk for cardiovascular disorders and nephropathy. Numerous studies evaluated the role of the ACE I/D polymorphism as well as other genetic variants of the RAAS in the context of RAAS inhibitor therapy. However, as race and environmental factors, such as salt intake also affect treatment response most studies were underpowered leading to conflicting results.

Pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation: insights into the renin-angiotensin system

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation is, to date, a major problem of public health with an important cost in the health care system.

DISCUSSION

The therapeutic strategies for atrial fibrillation are complex and their outcomes have been disappointing globally. New ablative techniques have brought important advances but the patient's profile has to be taken into account in the choice of the therapeutic strategies. The renin-angiotensin system plays a major role in the phenomena of remodelling following the onset of atrial fibrillation.

CONCLUSION

Drugs blocking the renin-angiotensin system can have a real place in the treatment of atrial fibrillation, not only to maintain sinus rhythm but primarily to prevent cardiovascular accidents in these patients with atrial fibrillation and in some cases to prevent the occurrence of atrial fibrillation, for example in hypertensive patients.

Direct pro-arrhythmogenic effects of angiotensin II can be suppressed by AT1 receptor blockade in human atrial myocardium

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia in clinical practice. Indirect evidence from clinical trials demonstrates that chronic inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) significantly reduces the incidence of AF. Since mechanisms of this protective effect of RAS-blockade are poorly understood, we directly tested proarrhythmic effects of angiotensin II (Ang II) in human atrial myocardium.

METHODS

Isolated trabeculae from human atrial appendages (n=80) were electrically stimulated. We assessed isometric force and incidence of arrhythmic extra contractions (AECs) with and without increasing concentrations of Ang II (1-1000 nmol/L) in the absence or presence of receptor-blockade by saralasin (non-specific ATR-antagonist), irbesartan (AT1R-antagonist) or PD123319 (AT2R-antagonist).

RESULTS

Twitch force and AECs concentration-dependently increased with Ang II. Effects became significant at concentrations >1 nmol/L Ang II and were maximal at 1000 nmol/L (increase in twitch force to 157+/-14% and AECs from 0 to 80%) saralasin and irbesartan partially prevented the inotropic effect of 100 nmol/L Ang II (by 45+/-12% and 68+/-6%; p<0.05), and completely prevented the occurrence of AECs.

CONCLUSION

Ang II exerts direct pro-arrhythmic effects in human atrial myocardium. These effects are mediated by AT1-receptors and can be prevented by AT1R-blockade. This mechanism may contribute to the beneficial effects of RAS-blockade on AF in clinical trials.

Endurance sport practice as a risk factor for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter

Although the benefits of regular exercise in controlling cardiovascular risk factors have been extensively proven, little is known about the long-term cardiovascular effects of regular and extreme endurance sport practice, such as jogging, cycling, rowing, swimming, etc. Recent data from a small series suggest a relationship between regular, long-term endurance sport practice and atrial fibrillation (AF) and flutter. Reported case control studies included less than 300 athletes, with mean age between 40 and 50. Most series recruited only male patients, or more than 70% males, who had been involved in intense training for many years. Endurance sport practice increases between 2 and 10 times the probability of suffering AF, after adjusting for other risk factors. The possible mechanisms explaining the association remain speculative. Atrial ectopic beats, inflammatory changes, and atrial size have been suggested. Some of the published studies found that atrial size was larger in athletes than in controls, and this was a predictor for AF. It has also been shown that the left atrium may be enlarged in as many as 20% of competitive athletes. Other proposed mechanisms are increased vagal tone and bradycardia, affecting the atrial refractory period; however, this may facilitate rather than cause the arrhythmia. In summary, recent data suggest an association between endurance sport practice and atrial fibrillation and flutter. The underlying mechanism explaining this association is unclear, although structural atrial changes (dilatation and fibrosis) are probably present. Larger longitudinal studies and mechanistic studies are needed to further characterize the association to clarify whether a threshold limit for the intensity and duration of physical activity may prevent AF, without limiting the cardiovascular benefits of exercise.

Absence of protective effect of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on atrial fibrillation development: insights from the Canadian Trial of Atrial Fibrillation (CTAF)

BACKGROUND

Antiarrhythmic agents have modest efficacy in preventing atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. Although retrospective analyses have suggested a preventive effect of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) on AF development in patients with congestive heart failure or hypertension, the value of these agents has not been evaluated in patients with AF but without a high prevalence of hypertension or heart failure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective analysis of the Canadian Trial of Atrial Fibrillation (CTAF) was conducted. CTAF demonstrated the superiority of amiodarone (A) over sotalol or propafenone (SP) in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with AF. Of the 403 patients randomly assigned in CTAF, 11.7% of the A group and 12.7% of the SP group were receiving a RAS inhibitor at baseline. By multivariate analysis (including all the risk factors known to be associated with AF available in the database), the use of RAS blockers in addition to antiarrhythmic agents was not associated with additional benefit against AF development. There was a recurrence of AF in 59 patients (38.3%) and 14 patients (29.8%) of groups A and A-RAS, respectively, while 93 patients (61.6%) and 32 patients (62.8%) of the SP and SP-RAS groups, respectively, experienced recurrent AF.

CONCLUSION

Blocking the RAS did not provide additional benefit against AF recurrence in CTAF patients treated with an antiarrhythmic drug. These results underscore the need for randomized clinical trials to clearly define the role of RAS inhibitors in treating AF.

Effect of valsartan and ramipril on atrial fibrillation recurrence and P-wave dispersion in hypertensive patients with recurrent symptomatic lone atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

This study compared the effect of antihypertensive treatment with valsartan or ramipril on atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence, on P-wave dispersion, (PWD) and on serum procollagen type I carboxy terminal peptide (PIP).

METHODS

A total of 369 mild hypertensive (systolic blood pressure (SBP) >140 and/or 90 < diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 110 mm Hg) outpatients in sinus rhythm but with at least two episodes of AF in the previous 6 months were randomized to valsartan (n = 122), ramipril (n = 124), or amlodipine (n = 123) for 1 year. Clinic blood pressure (BP) and a 24-h electrocardiogram (ECG) were evaluated monthly. Patients were asked to report any episode of symptomatic AF and to perform an ECG as early as possible. PWD and serum PIP levels were evaluated before and after each treatment period.

RESULTS

SBP and DBP were significantly reduced by the three treatments (P < 0.001). A total of 46 (47.4%) patients treated with amlodipine had a recurrence of AF as did 26 (27.9%) patients treated with ramipril (P < 0.01 vs. amlodipine) and 16 (16.1%) patients treated with valsartan (P < 0.01 vs. amlodipine and P < 0.05 vs. ramipril). The Kaplan-Meyer analysis showed a significant reduction of AF episodes in the valsartan group (P = 0.005 log-rank test) as well as in the ramipril group (P = 0.021), even if at a lesser degree. PWD values were significantly reduced by ramipril (-4.2 ms, P < 0.05) and even more by valsartan (-11.2 ms, P < 0.01), the difference being significant (P < 0.01). Serum PIP levels were reduced by ramipril (-49.7 microg, P < 0.001) and valsartan (-49.3 microg, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite similar BP lowering, valsartan and ramipril were more effective than amlodipine in preventing new episodes of AF, but the effect of valsartan was greater than that of ramipril. This could be related to the greater PWD reduction observed with valsartan.

The role of the renin-angiotensin system in atrial fibrillation and the therapeutic effects of ACE-Is and ARBS

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common rhythm disturbance in medical practice and represents a very expensive health problem. AF can be managed with the prevention of thromboembolism and either a rate control of rhythm strategy. As both strategies have important limitations, probably a preventative strategy in patients at risk of developing arrhythmia can be a more attractive option. The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) seems to be involved in the genesis of arrhythmia by the following two mechanisms: 1. the induction of atrial fibrosis and structural remodelling by mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) expression and reduction of collagenase activity; 2. the induction of electrical remodelling by shortening of the atrial effective refractory period (AERP) and of the action potential duration. For these reasons it has been hypothesized that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) and angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs) may play a role in preventing AF recurrence. The aim of the present review was to analyse evidence supporting the usefulness of RAS inhibition in patients with AF in order to focus on which specific subset of patients it would most favour. After reviewing the literature, we conclude that, although many studies and meta-analysis have supported the advantage of RAS block in preventing AF recurrence, it is premature to recommend the use of ACE-Is and ARBs specifically for the prevention of AF. However we believe that as these drugs are safe and manageable, they should be considered the drugs of choice in patients with AF and coexisting clinical conditions such as hypertension, coronary disease, heart failure and diabetes mellitus.

Rationale for and design of the CREATIVE-AF trial: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of the effect of irbesartan on oxidative stress and adhesion molecules in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. Recent studies suggest there is an angiotensin II-dependent increase in adhesion molecules and oxidative stress parameters during AF. These alterations appear to contribute to inflammatory and prothrombotic changes in the atrial endocardium ('endocardial remodelling'), suggesting that patients with increased levels of these factors might be at risk of thromboembolic events. The purpose of the CREATIVE-AF (Impact of Irbesartan on Oxidative Stress and C-Reactive Protein Levels in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation) trial is to prove the principle concept that blockade of angiotensin II type 1 receptors by irbesartan reduces levels of circulating adhesion molecules and oxidative stress parameters in patients with persistent AF by 25% compared with placebo.

METHODS

This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in patients with persistent/permanent AF. A total of 60 patients are planned to be included in the study. Patients will receive placebo and irbesartan therapy for 9 weeks each. Levels of adhesion molecules (intercellular adhesion molecule-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1), inflammatory markers (high sensitivity C-reactive protein, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, von Willebrand factor, tumour growth factor-beta1, tumour necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6) and oxidative stress parameters (8-iso-prostaglandin F2alpha) will be determined after each treatment phase and compared with baseline levels.

CONCLUSION

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists may help reduce levels of circulating adhesion molecules and oxidative stress parameters in patients with persistent AF. This article summarizes the rationale and design of the CREATIVE-AF trial, which has been designed to test this hypothesis.

Aldosterone synthase gene polymorphism as a determinant of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure

We analyzed the possible association between aldosterone synthase (CYP11B2) T-344C polymorphism, which is associated with increased aldosterone activity, and the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in 196 consecutive patients who had symptomatic systolic heart failure (HF; left ventricular ejection fraction <40%) for > or =3 months before recruitment. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes using a standard protocol. Subjects were genotyped for the CYP11B2 polymorphism using the polymerase chain reaction/restriction fragment length polymorphism approach. AF was present in 63 patients (33%) with HF. We found the -344 CC genotype to be a strong independent marker for AF. Almost 1/2 (45%) of patients with this genotype had AF compared with 1/4 (27%) with -344 TT and TC genotypes (p = 0.01). A multivariate stepwise logistic regression model that included age, gender, New York Heart Association class, CYP11B2 -344CC genotype, and echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction, left atrial dimension, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, and mitral regurgitation severity showed that the CYP11B2 CC genotype (adjusted for age and left atrial size) was an independent predictor of AF (adjusted odds ratio 2.35, 95% confidence interval 1.57 to 3.51, p = 0.03). In conclusion, CYP11B2 T-344C promoter polymorphism predisposes to clinical AF in patients with HF.

Atorvastatin prevents atrial fibrillation in patients with bradyarrhythmias and implantation of an atrial-based or dual-chamber pacemaker: a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Increasing evidence suggests that atrial fibrillation (AF) is an inflammatory disease. Statins is an anti-inflammatory agent. The present study was conducted to test the efficacy of atorvastatin in preventing paroxysmal AF or atrial high rate episodes (AHEs) in patients with bradyarrhythmias and implantation of an atrial-based or dual-chamber pacemaker.

METHODS

The effect of atorvastatin on time to the first attack of AF or AHE (> or =180 per minute and > or =1 or 10 minutes), which was accurately detected by pacemaker interrogation, was evaluated in an open-label prospective randomized design for 1 year of follow-up.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients (23 males, 70 +/- 13 years old) were randomized to the statin group (atorvastatin 20 mg/d) and 54 (25 males, 72 +/- 13 years old) to the nonstatin group. Event-free survivals from AHE > or =1 minute were not significantly different between the 2 groups (log-rank P = .410). However, patients in the nonstatin group were more likely to develop AHE > or =10 minutes than those in the statin group (log-rank P = .028). Atrial high rate episode > or =10 minutes occurred in 3 (5.8%) of 51 patients in the statin group after 1 year of follow-up, and 10 (19.2%) of 52 patients (odds ratio 0.26, P = .041) in the nonstatin group. The mean left atrial volume of the statin group was significantly lower than that of the nonstatin group at the end of follow-up (39.7 +/- 1.7 vs 43.7 +/- 1.9 mL, P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrated the efficacy of atorvastatin in preventing significant AF (> or =10 minutes) and left atrial enlargement in patients with bradyarrhythmias and implantation of a pacemaker.

Inhomogenic effect of bepridil on atrial electrical remodeling in a canine rapid atrial stimulation model

BACKGROUND

The antiarrhythmic or reverse remodeling effects of bepridil, a multi-ion channel blocker, have been recently reported, but inhomogeneity of the electrical remodeling and effects of bepridil have been observed in previous reports. In this study, the effect of long-term administration of bepridil on atrial electrical remodeling was evaluated in a comparison of the right and left atrium (RA and LA) in a canine rapid atrial stimulation model.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 10 beagle dogs, rapid atrial pacing (400 beats/min) was delivered for 6 weeks and the atrial effective refractory period (AERP), conduction velocity (CV) and inducibility of atrial fibrillation (AF) were evaluated every week. In 5 of the pacing dogs, bepridil (10 mg . kg(-1) . day(-1)) was administered orally, starting 2 weeks after the initiation of the rapid pacing. At the end of the protocol, the hemodynamic parameters and extent of tissue fibrosis were evaluated and the mRNA of SCN5A, Kv4.3, the L-type Ca2+ channel (LCC) and connexin (Cx) 40, 43, and 45 in both atria were examined by quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. In the pacing control group, AERP shortening, decreased CV, increased AF inducibility and downregulation of the expression of SCN5A and LCC were observed. In the bepridil group, the AERP exhibited a relatively quick recovery after bepridil was started in the first week and continued to recover gradually until the end of the protocol, but that recovery was smaller in the LA than in the RA. The CV was not affected by bepridil administration. AF inducibility was well suppressed in the RA in the bepridil group, but the induction of short-duration AF could not be suppressed in the LA. The mRNA downregulation of the LCC and SCN5A was negated by bepridil administration in the RA; but not in the LA; however, the data showed similar tendencies. There were no significant differences in the hemodynamic parameters or tissue fibrosis and the mRNA expression of Kv4.3, Cx40, 43, and 45 between the pacing control and bepridil groups.

CONCLUSION

Bepridil exhibited an anti-electrical remodeling effect in this study as previously reported, but the effect was inhomogeneous between the RA and LA, with the LA appearing to be more resistant to the effect of bepridil.

Pharmacotherapy of atrial fibrillation: an old option with new possibilities

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained arrhythmia observed worldwide. Despite modern ablative treatment options, pharmacotherapy remains the first-line therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVE

Based on recently published guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation, the present paper reviews the current and emerging concepts of pharmacotherapy in atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search was conducted using the keyword 'atrial fibrillation' and 'drug therapy'. The reviewed literature included clinical trials and published reviews as well as clinical guidelines.

RESULTS

The mainstay of atrial fibrillation therapy is the prevention of thromboembolic events. With growing knowledge of the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation new drug targets have been identified that promise improved outcomes in atrial fibrillation management and this will allow individual drug treatment in the near future.

Management of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure

BACKGROUND

There is a well-documented relationship and a complex interaction between atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure. The coexistence of these 2 clinical entities renders their management even more challenging.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We searched current literature to review the management of AF in patients with heart failure. The cornerstones of AF treatment are rate control, cardioversion, and maintenance of sinus rhythm (SR), and prevention of thromboembolism. The issue of rhythm versus rate control remains unresolved. Nonpharmacologic therapies such as radiofrequency catheter ablation of the atrioventricular node with permanent pacemaker implantation, curative catheter ablation of AF, and cardiac resynchronization therapy are emerging and may alter the management of these patients.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of atrial fibrillation in the setting of heart failure encompasses a variety of approaches including drugs, devices, and ablation. Larger randomized trials are required to clarify the management of such patients.

Atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and congestive heart failure (CHF) are common cardiac conditions that frequently coexist. There is a complex interplay between the two conditions, with each increasing the morbidity and mortality associated with the other. The management of AF in patients with CHF requires special care because of the increased risk of antiarrhythmic drug therapy in the group. This report reviews current treatment options and assesses the role of the newer therapies of biventricular pacing for CHF and radiofrequency ablation for AF. It also discusses results of the AF-CHF study, which were reported in November 2007.

The effects of losartan on signal-averaged P wave in patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Losartan has recently been reported to suppress atrial structural remodeling. However, few reports exist on signal-averaged electrocardiography (ECG) for preventing atrial electrical remodeling. We examined the effect of losartan on atrial electricity by using signal-averaged ECG of P waves.

METHODS

The subjects comprised 40 patients with essential hypertension complicated with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The patients received pilsicainide for the complication; they were defibrillated and divided into two subgroups for antihypertensive therapy: calcium antagonist-administrated (CB) and losartan-administrated (LOS) groups. We recorded the signal-averaged electrocardiography of P waves and calculated (1) filtered P wave duration (PD), (2) the voltage integral for the entire P wave (integral-p), and (3) the root mean square voltages of the terminal 40, 30, and 20 ms (RMS-40, RMS-30, and RMS-20). Procollagen C propeptide type I (PIP) and A- and B-type natriuretic peptide (ANP and BNP, respectively) levels in the groups were measured before and after antihypertensive agent administration.

RESULTS

RMS-20 increased significantly and PD decreased significantly in the LOS group 24 weeks after antihypertensive drug administration; however, they remained unchanged in the CB group. Integral-p decreased significantly in both groups, and the decrease rate was significantly higher in the LOS group. Serum BNP levels decreased significantly only in the LOS group.

CONCLUSIONS

Losartan inhibits atrial remodeling by inhibiting left atrial fibrosis as indicated by the procollagen C propeptide type I, ANP, and BNP levels. Signal-averaged ECG demonstrated that losartan suppresses atrial fibrillation recurrence by improving atrial conduction disturbance.