Valence-Shell Electron-Pair Repulsion Theory Revisited: An Explanation for Core Polarization

DNA as a perfect quantum computer based on the quantum physics principles

DNA is a complex multi-resolution molecule whose theoretical study is a challenge. Its intrinsic multiscale nature requires chemistry and quantum physics to understand the structure and quantum informatics to explain its operation as a perfect quantum computer. Here, we present theoretical results of DNA that allow a better description of its structure and the operation process in the transmission, coding, and decoding of genetic information. Aromaticity is explained by the oscillatory resonant quantum state of correlated electron and hole pairs due to the quantized molecular vibrational energy acting as an attractive force. The correlated pairs form a supercurrent in the nitrogenous bases in a single band π -molecular orbital ( π -MO). The MO wave function ( Φ ) is assumed to be the linear combination of the n constituent atomic orbitals. The central Hydrogen bond between Adenine (A) and Thymine (T) or Guanine (G) and Cytosine (C) functions like an ideal Josephson Junction. The approach of a Josephson Effect between two superconductors is correctly described, as well as the condensation of the nitrogenous bases to obtain the two entangled quantum states that form the qubit. Combining the quantum state of the composite system with the classical information, RNA polymerase teleports one of the four Bell states. DNA is a perfect quantum computer.

Atomic shell structure from Born probabilities: Comparison to other shell descriptors and persistence in molecules

Real space chemical bonding descriptors, such as the electron localization function or the Laplacian of the electron density, have been widely used in electronic structure theory thanks to their power to provide chemically intuitive spatial images of bonded and non-bonded interactions. This capacity stems from their ability to display the shell structure of atoms and its distortion upon molecular formation. Here, we examine the spatial position of the N electrons of an atom at the maximum of the square of the wavefunction, the so-called Born maximum, as a shell structure descriptor for ground state atoms with Z = 1-36, comparing it to other available indices. The maximization is performed with the help of variational quantum Monte Carlo calculations. We show that many electron effects (mainly Pauli driven) are non-negligible, that Born shells are closer to the nucleus than any other of the examined descriptors, and that these shells are very well preserved in simple molecules.

Energetics of Electron Pairs in Electrophilic Aromatic Substitutions

The interacting quantum atoms approach (IQA) as applied to the electron-pair exhaustive partition of real space induced by the electron localization function (ELF) is used to examine candidate energetic descriptors to rationalize substituent effects in simple electrophilic aromatic substitutions. It is first shown that inductive and mesomeric effects can be recognized from the decay mode of the aromatic valence bond basin populations with the distance to the substituent, and that the fluctuation of the population of adjacent bonds holds also regioselectivity information. With this, the kinetic energy of the electrons in these aromatic basins, as well as their mutual exchange-correlation energies are proposed as suitable energetic indices containing relevant information about substituent effects. We suggest that these descriptors could be used to build future reactive force fields.

From the Linnett-Gillespie model to the polarization of the spin valence shells of metals in complexes

In this paper, we present a novel approach to track the origin of the metal complex structure from the topology of the α and β spin densities as an extension of the Linnett-Gillespie model. Usually, the theories that explain the metal-ligand interactions consider the disposition and the relative energies of the empty or occupied set of d orbitals, ignoring the spin contribution explicitly. Our quantum topological approach considers the spatial distribution of the α and β spin valence shells, and the energy interaction between them. We used the properties of the atomic graph, a topological object that summarises the charge concentrations and depletions on the valence shell of an atom in a molecule, and the interacting quantum atoms (IQA) energy partition scheme. Unlike the Linnett-Gillespie model, which is based on electron-electron repulsion, our approach states that the ligands provoke a redistribution of the electron density to maximize the nuclear-electron interactions in each spin valence shell to bypass the concentration of electron-electron interactions, resulting in a polarization pattern which determines the position of the ligands.

Covalent and Non-covalent Noble Gas Bonding Interactions in XeF n Derivatives (n = 2-6): A Combined Theoretical and ICSD Analysis

A noble gas bond (also known in the literature as aerogen bond) can be defined as the attractive interaction between any element of group-18 acting as a Lewis acid and any electron rich atom of group of atoms, thus following the IUPAC recommendation available for similar π,σ-hole interactions involving elements of groups 17 (halogens) and 16 (chalcogens). A significant difference between noble gas bonding (NgB) and halogen (HaB) or chalcogen (ChB) bonding is that whilst the former is scarcely found in the literature, HaB and ChB are very common and their applications in important fields like catalysis, biochemistry or crystal engineering have exponentially grown in the last decade. This article combines theory and experiment to highlight the importance of non-covalent NgBs in the solid state of several xenon fluorides [XeF_n]^m+ were the central oxidation state of Xe varies from +2 to +6 and the number of fluorine atoms varies from n = 2 to 6. The compounds with an odd number of fluorine atoms (n = 3 and 5) are cationic (m = 1). The Inorganic Crystal Structural Database (ICSD) strongly evidences the relevance of NgBs in the solid state structures of xenon derivatives. The ability of Xe compounds to participate in π,σ-hole interactions has been studied using different types of electron donors (Lewis bases and anions) using DFT calculations (PBE1PBE-D3/def2-TZVP) and the molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) surfaces.