Procainamide accumulation kinetics in the immediate postmyocardial infarction period

Prevention of primary ventricular fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction with prophylactic lidocaine

Primary ventricular fibrillation (VF) during an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) occurs with a high incidence and mortality rate with or without thrombolysis. The incidence varies from 2% to 19% depending on the definition of "primary." Primary VF in this study refers to fibrillation occurring in the absence of shock or pulmonary edema. Mortality rate, when primary VF occurs, is 2 to 4 times greater than when it does not. Prevention of VF has been impeded by the publication of the 1996 recommendations of the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology against the use of prophylactic lidocaine based on meta-analysis studies implying toxicity. This observational study of 4,254 patients with AMI reports the incidence and mortality rates of primary VF over 32 years. Of the 4,254 patients, 4,150 received prophylactic lidocaine, and 104 patients did not receive prophylactic lidocaine due to the 1996 guidelines, after which administration of prophylactic lidocaine was governed by physician choice. The incidence of primary VF was 0.5% among the 4,150 who received prophylactic lidocaine and 10% among the 104 who did not (p <0.0001). Among the 4,150 receiving prophylactic lidocaine, sinoatrial block occurred in 0.5% and complete infranodal atrial ventricular block occurred in 0.2%, all secondary to the site of infarction (concurrent serum lidocaine levels were < 4 microg/ml). Asystole was an agonal rhythm in 4%; these patients had been off lidocaine for 48 hours. Mortality rates were 10.5% in patients without primary VF and 25% in patients with VF (p <0.001). Thus, prophylactic lidocaine markedly decreased the incidence of VF in 4,150 patients with AMI to 0.5% compared with trials before and after thrombolysis (2% to 19%) and with the 104 patients in this study who did not receive prophylactic lidocaine (10%). No lidocaine-induced sinoatrial or atrial ventricular block or asystole occurred.

The hepatic first-pass metabolism of problematic drugs

The first-pass hepatic metabolism of a number of important therapeutic agents is inconsistent with traditional models that assume that the hepatic extraction ratio of a drug is constant in each individual (independent of the concentration of drug in the hepatic sinusoidal blood and also independent of the history of exposure to the drug). In this review, the authors examine the first-pass metabolism of five "problematic drugs" (propranolol, lidocaine, propafenone, verapamil, and nitroglycerin). Each of these compounds has unique facets to its hepatic clearance and pharmacokinetics as well as striking similarities. Selected aspects of first-pass metabolism are reviewed, and a theory that may explain some of the unusual behavior of the four lipophilic bases (propranolol, lidocaine, propafenone, and verapamil) is presented. Finally, the unusual and variable clearance of nitroglycerin is discussed.

Effects of cardiovascular disease on pharmacokinetics

The pathophysiologic changes occurring in cardiovascular disease can affect the kinetics of drugs in several different ways. The present review examines these modifications and the underlying mechanisms. The kinetics of specific agents, such as antiarrhythmic, antihypertensive, cardiotonic, and other drugs are considered, and the clinical implications are outlined. The clinician should be aware of these modifications, because they require an adjustment of the dosage regimen. A rational basis for a correct therapeutic choice can be provided by adequate knowledge of these modifications.

Procainamide pharmacokinetics in patients with acute myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure

Abnormal procainamide pharmacokinetics (prolonged half-life and decreased volume of distribution) and pharmacodynamics (decreased threshold for the suppression of premature ventricular complexes) have been suggested in patients with acute myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure, or both. To better define procainamide kinetics, 37 patients in the acute care setting received intravenous procainamide (25 mg/min, median dose 750 mg) with peak and hourly blood samples taken over 6 hours. Compared with the 10 control patients, the 12 patients with acute myocardial infarction and the 15 patients with congestive heart failure had normal procainamide pharmacokinetics with respect to half-life (2.3 +/- 1.0, 2.5 +/- 0.9 and 2.6 +/- 0.8 hours, respectively), volume of distribution (1.9 +/- 0.7, 1.8 +/- 0.4 and 1.8 +/- 0.5 liters/kg, respectively), clearance (11.3 +/- 7.5, 9.3 +/- 3.6 and 9.1 +/- 3.5 ml/min per kg, respectively) and unbound drug fraction (66 +/- 9, 66 +/- 9 and 69 +/- 4%, respectively). Low thresholds for greater than 85% premature ventricular complex suppression were confirmed in these patients (median 4.7 micrograms/ml in patients with acute myocardial infarction and 3.3 micrograms/ml in patients with congestive heart failure). Thus, differences in the response of premature ventricular complexes to procainamide reflect electropharmacologic differences dependent on clinical setting rather than pharmacokinetic abnormalities. Furthermore, the reduction of procainamide dosing in patients with acute myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure, based solely on prior kinetic data, may result in inappropriate antiarrhythmic therapy.

Lidocaine clinical pharmacokinetics

A review of the clinical pharmacokinetics of lidocaine is presented. Available evidence suggests that antiarrhythmic effects are reasonably well correlated wih plasma concentration. Adverse effects also covary with plasma concentration, but available evidence suggests that the correlation is not strong. A simple, multiple-bolus loading schedule appears to be superior to techniques using loading infusions; most of the multiple-bolus protocols mandate that only enough drug be given to attain the desired pharmacologic effect. In contrast, the loading infusion protocols almost invariably require the administration of a fixed dose, regardless of what fraction of the dose has been given when arrhythmia suppression is achieved. Since multiple-bolus and constant-rate infusion techniques have been shown to reduce substantially the incidence of primary ventricular fibrillation, they should be considered appropriate prophylactic and treatment regimens for acute myocardial infarction patients.

Factors influencing procainamide total body clearance in the immediate postmyocardial infarction period

Fifteen acute myocardial infarction patients (only one of whom had evidence of significant renal dysfunction) received a constant-rate intravenous infusion of procainamide at one rate for a least 24 hours. Steady-state plasma levels achieved during these infusions were used to calculate total body clearance (C/B). Linear regression analysis of C/B versus a variety of clinical and laboratory patient characteristics yielded only body weight (or parameters derived from it) as a significant covariant (r = 0.713, P less than or equal to 0.005). Interestingly, the data from these 15 patients suggest that the presence of a significant degree of heart failure at the start of therapy did not result in a significant decrease in C/B (C/B = 5.9 ml/min/kg when class 0-I failure was present at the start of therapy and C/B = 5.5 ml/min/kg when class III-IV failure was present). If the data from five other patients who were studied previously are added to the group reported here, the conclusions reached would be the same. These data suggest that in patients with good renal and hepatic function, initial procainamide infusion rate could be selected on the basis of body weight and need not consider the initial presence of moderate heart failure. However, intense clinical monitoring for signs of impeding serious toxicity is strongly recommended since the observed regression line did not predict total body clearance accurately in 10-15 per cent of the patients studied.