Short- and long-term therapeutic efficacy of quinidine sulfate for the treatment of chronic ventricular arrhythmias

The effects of quinidine and its chiral isolates on erg-1sm potassium current and correlation with gastrointestinal augmentation

Smooth-muscle erg 1 (erg1-sm) potassium channel has been recently reported to participate in the modulation of gastrointestinal contractility. Because quinidine inhibits cardiac potassium channel and as a result augments gastrointestinal contractility, it was thought that quinidine may affect erg1-sm. Studies were undertaken to evaluate the effects of quinidine and its chiral isolates on gastrointestinal erg1-sm potassium current and correlate these effects with colon contractility. Chiral separation (high-performance liquid chromatography technique), mass spectrometry, and optical rotation determination were performed to obtain chiral isolates needed for experiments. The erg1-sm potassium channel was expressed in Xenopus oocytes, and the two-electrode patch clamp technique was employed for recording. An isolated rat colon preparation was employed to measure changes in contractility. As a result of chiral separation, two peaks were obtained with elution times of 8.31 and 8.66 minutes, both with a molecular weight of 324; the optical rotations of racemate isolates X and Y were: +258 degrees, +/-0 degrees; and +217 degrees, respectively. The percentage changes in amplitudes of colon contraction (from baseline) were determined at different concentrations of quinidine and for the two isolates in five experiments in each group. Quinidine 0.1, 1, and 10 microM increased contractility by 79 +/- 34, 125 +/- 42, and 217 +/- 51 (P < or = 0.05); for isolate X, the values were 70 +/- 20, 115 +/- 32, and 272 +/- 32 (P < or = 0.05), and for isolate Y the values were 22 +/- 12, 46 +/- 17, and 59 +/- 22. The inhibition of erg1-sm currents by quinidine was 19 +/- 4, 21 +/- 5, and 48 +/- 6 (P < or = 0.05), respectively; that by isolate X was 20 +/- 4, 23 +/- 5, and 39 +/- 7 (P < or = 0.05), and that by isolate Y was 22 +/- 4, 21 +/- 4, and 31 +/- 6. One chiral isolate and quinidine markedly augmented contractility, whereas quinidine and the two chiral isolates inhibited the erg1-sm potassium currents to a similar extent. These results suggest that erg1-sm inhibition does not explain gastrointestinal contractile augmentation caused by the quinidine racemate and its chiral isolates.

Comparison of electrophysiologic effects of quinidine and amiodarone in sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias associated with coronary artery disease

Fifteen patients with spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias underwent electrophysiologic studies at baseline and during therapy with quinidine and amiodarone. In 9, ventricular tachycardia (VT) with a similar QRS morphology was induced with quinidine, amiodarone and under the control state. Both quinidine and amiodarone significantly increased QRS duration and the VT cycle length. Amiodarone increased the VT cycle length more than quinidine (85 vs 121 ms, p < 0.05). Amiodarone increased the percent QRS duration (during sinus rhythm, ventricular pacing and VT) significantly less than percent VT cycle length, whereas quinidine did so only at slow rates (at faster rates the percent increase in QRS duration is not different from the percent increase in VT cycle length). The percent increase in QRS duration produced by quinidine correlated significantly with the percent increase in VT cycle length (the best correlation was observed during pacing, r = 0.78). In contrast, no such significant correlations were obtained for amiodarone. Thus, amiodarone prolongs VT cycle length more than quinidine (at the doses used). The effects of quinidine on conduction in tissue mostly unrelated to tachycardia origin predict effects in the tachycardia cycle length. In contrast, the effects of amiodarone on the latter are more intense but not predicted by those on tissue unrelated to the tachycardia origin.

Effect of aluminum hydroxide gel on quinidine gluconate absorption

The effect of aluminum hydroxide gel on quinidine gluconate bioavailability was studied in eight nonsmoking healthy male volunteers. Subjects were randomized to receive quinidine gluconate 648 mg with and without 30 mL of aluminum hydroxide gel. The mean area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) (23.11 +/- 5.21 mg.h/L), time to reach maximum concentration (tmax) (3.13 +/- 0.64 h), maximum serum concentration (1.44 +/- 0.41 mg/L), and elimination rate constant (0.069 +/- 0.010-h) observed during the control phase of the trial did not differ significantly (p greater than 0.05) from values obtained during the coadministration of aluminum hydroxide with quinidine gluconate (23.91 +/- 4.48 mg.h/L, 4.13 +/- 2.12 h, 1.53 +/- 0.34 mg/L, and 0.077 +/- 0.013-h, respectively). There was considerable individual variation in AUC with one subject demonstrating an increase of 35 percent and one subject demonstrating a decrease of 18 percent. There was a trend toward aluminum hydroxide delaying tmax with only one subject experiencing an earlier tmax with the coadministration of aluminum hydroxide. The results of this single-dose trial suggest that, although statistically the concurrent administration of aluminum hydroxide gel with quinidine gluconate does not significantly alter the extent of quinidine absorption, clinically significant individual variations may occasionally occur.

Effects of propafenone on ventricular arrhythmias: double-blind, parallel, randomized, placebo-controlled dose-ranging study

Propafenone is a new class Ic antiarrhythmic compound with a broad pharmacologic profile. In this study, its dose-response relationship was examined in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled five treatment parallel design protocol. Patients enrolled had heart disease with Lown grade 2 premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) (greater than or equal to 30/hr) documented on 24-hour Holter recordings. Propafenone was compared in four doses (337.5, 450, 675, and 900 mg/day) to placebo. The double-blind phase lasted 2 weeks. Two hundred twenty-six patients were enrolled, of whom 171 were men and 55 were women; their mean age was 59.8 years and 85% were Caucasian and 4% were black. The arrhythmias were symptomatic in 173. Twenty (8.8%) withdrew from the study before completion: 15 had adverse reactions, two had intercurrent illnesses, and three withdrew for administrative reasons. In one patient, the density of arrhythmia appeared to increase with propafenone. Side effects were of central nervous system or gastrointestinal origin; less than 5% of patients developed first-degree atrioventricular block or intraventricular conduction defect. There were no deaths in the study. The occurrence of side effects was not related to dose. Propafenone had no effect on heart rate. It increased the PR interval at all doses (9% to 22% compared to placebo at baseline; p less than 0.01) at 450 to 900 mg/day after 2 weeks of therapy. The drug increased the QRS duration at all doses, highly significantly at 675 mg/day (8.5 msec; p less than 0.01) and at 900 mg/day (15.7 msec; p less than 0.01) after 2 weeks of therapy. Only at the highest dose was the QTc slightly but significantly (14.3 msec; p less than 0.01) increased. Propafenone exerted a dose-dependent effect on PVCs recorded on serial 24-hour Holter recordings: compared to placebo, at 2 weeks 337.5 mg/day reduced PVCs by 70.8% (p less than 0.05), 450 mg/day reduced PVCs by 82.0% (p less than 0.01), 675 mg/day reduced PVCs by 90.2% (p less than 0.01) and 900 mg/day reduced PVCs by 95.3% (p less than 0.01). The effects of the two highest doses of propafenone were significantly greater than those of 337.5 mg/day. In 68% of the patients receiving 900 mg/day, 80% or greater reduction in total PVCs was found. In addition, there was a greater than 90% decrease in ventricular couplets, and 96% decrease in ventricular tachycardia (VT) beats. Propafenone eliminated PVCs in 8% of all patients, ventricular couplets in 58%, and VT beats in 91%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Comparative efficacy and safety of oral mexiletine and quinidine in benign or potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias

The antiarrhythmic efficacy and safety of oral mexiletine hydrochloride and quinidine sulfate were compared at 29 clinical centers in a double-blind, parallel-group trial involving 491 patients with benign or potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias. Responders were defined as those who had at least a 70% reduction in the frequency of ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) that persisted for 12 weeks, and who experienced no intolerable side effects that required discontinuation of therapy. Of the patients available for analysis, 71 of 232 (31%) in the mexiletine and 73 of 225 (32%) in the quinidine group met these criteria. The dose range used for mexiletine was 200 to 400 mg every 8 hours, and that for quinidine 200 to 400 mg every 6 hours. More than half of the patients in each group were successfully treated with the smallest dose (200 mg every 8 hours mexiletine vs 200 mg every 6 hours for quinidine). Quinidine significantly prolonged the QT interval, whereas mexiletine did not. Proarrhythmic reactions were recorded in 18 of 221 (9%) patients taking quinidine and 10 of 217 (5%) patients taking mexiletine. There was no difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the 2 groups; in both, the most common side effects were related to the gastrointestinal and central nervous systems. Mexiletine thus represents an alternative to quinidine for the treatment of patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Efficacy of oral and intravenous indecainide in ventricular arrhythmias

To evaluate the efficacy of oral and intravenous indecainide, a new class IC antiarrhythmic agent, 3 separate protocols were performed in patients with benign or potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias. An open-label intravenous trail in 10 patients was conducted using a dose of 1.7 mg/kg/min under constant monitoring. An oral short-term in-hospital trial in 20 patients (8 patients entered directly from the intravenous short-term trial) was conducted using a single-blind placebo dose titration protocol in which 50 mg of indecainide every 8 hours was increased at 3-day intervals to 75 mg, and then 100 mg every 8 hours depending on the observed change in ventricular arrhythmia frequency by Holter monitoring. Finally, an outpatient long-term oral trial was conducted in 17 of the 20 patients who completed the inpatient oral short-term trail. Two of the 10 patients from the inpatient intravenous trail did not enter the oral trial, because a proarrhythmic response developed in 1 and because of a lack of efficacy in the other. During the inpatient oral trial, 17 of 20 patients (85%) responded to indecainide and entered the long-term phase. Two of these patients were removed from the trial because of lack of efficacy at 3 and 10 months, respectively. In the oral therapy protocols, minor side effects of the central nervous system occurred in 4 of 17 patients (24%). Six of 20 patients (30%) each had more than a 25% increase in PR and QRS duration that was not associated with higher degrees of block.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Efficacy and safety of oral cibenzoline for ventricular arrhythmias

This study evaluates acute and chronic therapy with cibenzoline, a new class I antiarrhythmic drug, in 49 patients with ventricular arrhythmias. Acute therapy with 260 to 330 mg/day of cibenzoline resulted in a significant reduction in the number of hourly ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) (from 377 +/- 60 to 116 +/- 33, p less than 0.001), total paired VPCs in 24 hours (from 531 +/- 196 to 101 +/- 66, p less than 0.02), and total episodes of ventricular tachycardia in 24 hours (from 31 +/- 10 to 4 +/- 3, p less than 0.01). Among this group, acute therapy resulted in more than 75% suppression of VPC frequency in 29 of 49 patients, more than 90% suppression of paired VPCs in 31 of 42 patients, and complete suppression of ventricular tachycardia in 21 of 27 patients. Radionuclide evaluation of ventricular function revealed no deleterious effect of cibenzoline on ventricular function. Significant suppression of VPC frequency was maintained during 6 months of therapy in 16 of 19 patients and during 12 months of therapy in 9 of 10 patients. Trough plasma cibenzoline levels were measured during the acute dosing period. These levels did not differ among the group of responders (326 +/- 140 ng/ml) compared with nonresponders (354 +/- 282 mg/ml). Cibenzoline therapy resulted in adverse effects 18 patients and necessitated discontinuing therapy in 12. No patient had a proarrhythmic effect. In conclusion, cibenzoline appears to be as efficacious as the available antiarrhythmic drugs in treating chronic complex ventricular arrhythmias. Drug-related adverse effects occur with a frequency similar to that of other antiarrhythmic drugs.

Comparative study of encainide and quinidine in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias

The antiarrhythmic efficacy and safety of oral encainide hydrochloride and quinidine sulfate were compared in a nine center double-blind crossover study in 187 outpatients with benign or potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias. Patients with at least 30 premature ventricular complexes/h were randomized to receive either encainide, 25 mg four times/day, or quinidine, 200 mg four times/day, for 2 weeks. These doses were continued for another 2 weeks if a 75% or greater reduction in premature ventricular complexes was observed. If this reduction was not seen, encainide was increased to 50 mg four times/day or quinidine to 400 mg four times/day for an additional 2 weeks. Both drugs produced a statistically significant reduction in premature ventricular complex frequency compared with baseline values. Encainide produced a statistically significant greater mean reduction in total premature ventricular complexes than did quinidine during the initial dose phase and after dose adjustment. More patients required dose increases of quinidine (60%) than of encainide (51%). Early discontinuation of treatment resulting in advancement to the next study period occurred in 12 patients taking encainide and 38 patients taking quinidine (p less than 0.05). PR and QRS intervals increased significantly during encainide treatment, as did QTc and JT intervals during quinidine treatment. No adverse reactions resulted from these electrocardiographic changes. Adverse reactions were more common with quinidine than with encainide.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparative efficacy and safety of short-acting and sustained release quinidine in the treatment of patients with ventricular arrhythmias

A comparative, fixed-dose, parallel, randomized, blinded trial to define the efficacy and safety of a new once-a-day quinidine preparation, Quiniday, at 1200 mg per day, was compared to quinidine sulfate (as Quinora, 300 mg four times daily, and Quinidex Extentabs, 600 mg twice daily) and to quinidine gluconate (as Quinaglute Dura-Tabs, 648 mg twice daily). After placebo washout from all prior antiarrhythmic agents, 76 patients with at least 30 ventricular premature complexes (VPCs)/hr on 48-hour ambulatory monitoring were randomized to 3 weeks of treatment with one of the four study drugs. There was no difference in the etiologic, demographic, New York Heart Association therapeutic classification, or ventricular arrhythmia frequency at baseline between the patients randomized to the four groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the percent efficacy for VPC reduction on any drug compared to baseline or in the percent efficacy of reduction in beats of ventricular tachycardia. There was no difference between the four agents in terms of types of side effects noted nor in their overall prevalence or need for premature discontinuation of therapy. This study demonstrated that a variety of quinidine preparations exist that do not differ in terms of their efficacy or safety, but that a long-acting, once-a-day preparation (Quiniday) was as effective and safe as other forms of quinidine despite its once-a-day dosing schedule. More compliant dosing regimens with effective well-known antiarrhythmic agents are important in the treatment of patients with potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias, in the hope that sudden cardiac death can be prevented.

Comparative efficacy and safety of oral tocainide and quinidine for benign and potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias

The antiarrhythmic efficacy and safety of oral tocainide hydrochloride and quinidine sulfate were compared in a double-blind, 3-center, parallel trial involving 133 patients with benign and potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias. Baseline demographic, etiologic, functional and ventricular arrhythmia data were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Two weeks of an initial placebo period were followed by 8 weeks of active drug treatment, concluding with 4 weeks of washout. Frequent 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring was used to judge efficacy. Ten of 27 patients (37%) receiving tocainide and 12 of 24 patients (50%) receiving quinidine had a 75% reduction with drug treatment compared with the initial placebo period (p greater than 0.25). Total abolition of ventricular tachycardia occurred in 6 of 16 patients (37%) receiving tocainide and 6 of 13 patients (43%) receiving quinidine (p greater than 0.25). Conditions that required discontinuation of therapy occurred in 18 of 67 patients (27%) receiving tocainide and 16 of 66 (24%) receiving quinidine (difference not significant). More patients had dizziness during tocainide treatment and diarrhea during quinidine treatment. Quinidine caused a prolongation in the QT interval (0.03 second); tocainide caused a slight reduction (0.01 second). No important changes in vital signs or laboratory measurements were observed in left ventricular ejection fraction when measured. Thus, tocainide, the new oral analog of lidocaine, appears to be as safe as quinidine but is slightly less effective in suppressing ventricular arrhythmias.

Therapy with conventional antiarrhythmic drugs for ventricular arrhythmias

Conventional antiarrhythmic drugs are an important tool for the clinical cardiologist for the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias. Knowledge of the different properties of these drugs will help decrease the incidence of adverse effects and increase the frequency of successful therapy.

Cibenzoline for treatment of ventricular arrhythmias: a double-blind placebo-controlled study

Cibenzoline, a new class I antiarrhythmic drug, was administered to 24 patients with frequent (greater than 30/h) premature ventricular complexes. Three patients discontinued the medication because of epigastric distress before repeat ambulatory electrocardiography. Of the remaining 21 patients, 13 responded to 130 mg twice daily by more than 75% suppression of premature ventricular complex frequency and 6 additional patients responded to 160 mg twice daily during an open-label titration phase. Events of ventricular tachycardia (greater than or equal to 3 beats) were totally suppressed in 9 of 10 patients and markedly diminished in the 1 remaining patient. During a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover phase in 16 patients (21 patients minus 2 nonresponders and 3 who developed side effects), cibenzoline suppressed the number of premature ventricular complexes per 24 hours (4,075 +/- 868 to 1,758 +/- 1,089, p = 0.02), the number of events of ventricular tachycardia (31 +/- 30 to 2 +/- 0, p = 0.01) and the number of premature ventricular complex pairs (61 +/- 28 to 25 +/- 21, p = 0.01). Cibenzoline plasma concentration was 59 to 421 ng/ml in responders and higher (387, 758 and 852 ng/ml, respectively) in the three subjects with side effects (right bundle branch block in one, hypotension in one, gastrointestinal upset and central nervous system complaints in one). Cibenzoline plasma concentration correlated with PR interval (r = 0.55, p = 0.0106) and corrected QT interval (r = 0.58, p = 0.0054). Further clinical investigation of this new antiarrhythmic agent is needed.

Comparative effect of disopyramide and ethmozine in suppressing complex ventricular arrhythmias by use of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, longitudinal crossover design

This placebo-controlled, double-blind, longitudinal crossover study compares the efficacy of disopyramide and ethmozine, a new investigational drug, in suppressing frequent (40 or more per hour) ventricular premature depolarizations (VPDs) in 27 patients completing a 37 day protocol. Although both drugs significantly reduced VPDs relative to placebo, ethmozine was a superior antiarrhythmic drug in ach9eving near-total abolition of VPDs (30% of patients), which was never observed during disopyramide dosing (p less than .05). At the 80% VPD reduction level, ethmozine was effective in 56% of all patients compared with an effectiveness in only 22% of patients during disopyramide therapy (p less than .05). The mean peak plasma level of ethmozine was 0.66 +/- 0.8 micrograms/ml, which significantly fell to a trough level of 0.1 +/- 0.08 micrograms/ml (p less than .001). Mean peak and trough plasma levels of disopyramide exhibited less fluctuation (2.6 +/- 0.9 micrograms/ml vs 2.2 +/- 0.9 micrograms/ml). Ethmozine had no effect on the QT interval, whereas disopyramide prolonged it significantly. Importantly, while disopyramide produced serious side effects in 30% of patients, ethmozine was well tolerated with no statistically significant side effects compared with placebo.

Flecainide versus quinidine for treatment of chronic ventricular arrhythmias. A multicenter clinical trial

The antiarrhythmic efficacy and safety of oral flecainide acetate and quinidine sulfate were compared in a double-blind, 16-center parallel trial involving 280 patients with chronic premature ventricular complexes (PVCs). Eighty-five percent of the flecainide patients had at least 80% suppression of PVCs, vs 57% of the quinidine patients (p less than 0.0001). Sixty-eight percent of the flecainide patients met the above criterion and also had complete suppression of couplets and beats of ventricular tachycardia, vs 33% of the quinidine patients (p less than 0.0001). PR and QRS intervals were prolonged by flecainide without clinical consequence, but they were not substantially affected by quinidine (p less than 0.0001). Quinidine prolonged JT (QT minus QRS) intervals significantly more than flecainide (p less than 0.05). Nineteen of 141 flecainide patients and 21 of 139 quinidine patients discontinued therapy because of side effects (p greater than 0.50). Flecainide side effects included dizziness, blurred vision, headache and nausea. Quinidine side effects included diarrhea, nausea, headache and dizziness. Flecainide was more effective than quinidine in suppressing chronic ventricular arrhythmias (especially complex forms), and thus is an important new antiarrhythmic agent.