Artificial Urinary Sphincter: Report of the 2015 Consensus Conference

British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) consensus document on post-prostatectomy incontinence-stress urinary incontinence

OBJECTIVES

To report the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) consensus document on the assessment and management of post-prostatectomy incontinence-stress urinary incontinence (PPI-SUI).

METHODS

We conducted a contemporary literature search to identify the current evidence base. A guideline development group was formed by the Female, Neurological and Urodynamic Urology (FNUU) Section of BAUS to formulate and review the recommendations. Where a lack of evidence was identified, expert opinion of the FNUU Executive Committee and a modified Delphi approach was utilised.

RESULTS

This consensus addresses several knowledge gaps in the current literature on PPI-SUI, in addition to tackling areas not addressed by the current international guidelines, e.g., prostate cancer survivorship. Of the initial draft, the modified Delphi consensus methodology was applied to 65 statements split into seven broad categories: terminology, assessment, conservative management, surgical treatment, perioperative care, complication management, and follow-up after PPI-SUI surgery. This is applicable to general and specialist Urologists worldwide. After three rounds, consensus was achieved with 63/65 statements.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide a modified Delphi consensus on the assessment and management of PPI-SUI to help guide and standardise the assessment and management pathway of these patients.

Treatment strategies for revision surgery of artificial urinary sphincter: A review

Artificial urinary sphincters (AUS) are an effective treatment for male stress urinary incontinence (SUI). However, infection, erosion, mechanical failure, atrophy, and balloon deterioration cause device malfunction in approximately half of patients by 10 years after implantation. Many patients desire to regain urinary continence and require revision surgery (RS), including device removal and simultaneous or delayed implantation. Patients for whom RS is considered should be examined physically and by interview for signs of infection. Urethral erosion should be assessed using cystoscopy. If there is infection or erosion, all devices should be removed first, and a new device should be implanted several months later. During the RS, after strong adhesion around the urethra, transcorporal cuff implantation is a safe choice. Device removal and simultaneous implantation can be performed in the absence of infection or erosion. If a long time has passed since device implantation, the entire device should be replaced due to device aging and deterioration; however, if the time is short, only the defective component need be replaced. Intraoperative assessment of urethral health is necessary for device removal and implantation. If the urethra is healthy, a new cuff can be placed in the same position as the old cuff was removed from; however, if the urethra is unhealthy, the cuff can be implanted in a more proximal/distal position, or a transcorporal cuff implant may be chosen. This article reviews the literature on diagnostic and treatment strategies for recurrent SUI in male patients with AUS and proposes a flowchart for AUS revision.

Male sling adjustability: does it truly matter?

PURPOSE

Patients with post prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) seem to have different needs. Therefore, device post-operative readjustability may be a beneficial feature in PPI management, even though it lacks study support. The purpose of this study is to describe our surgical technique for male sling (MS) implantation, assess outcomes, and the impact of readjustability.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 89 consecutive patients who underwent PPI correction with MS Argus-T™ (Promedon, Córdoba, Argentina) from 2009 to 2021. The median follow-up was 48 months (12-120). Data were collected in a dedicated database. Perioperative variables were assessed. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Clinical and urodynamic variables were correlated with the need for readjustments and success.

RESULTS

In this cohort, objective success was achieved in 80.5% of the patients (65.9% cured and 14.6% improved). A total of 85.4% of the patients met the criteria for subjective success (74.4% cured and 11% improved). For the subgroup of patients who received previous treatment for urethral stricture (US), 79% achieved objective success (63.2% cured, 15.8% improved), and 84.2% achieved subjective success (78.9% cured, 5.3% improved). For the subgroup of patients who received previous radiotherapy (RT) before sling surgery, 68.7% achieved objective success (37.5% cured, 31.2% improved), and 75% achieved subjective success (37.5% cured, 37.5% improved). Procedures for device readjustment were necessary for 27.7% of patients in the total study population. RT and previous US treatment were predictive factors for the need of readjustment, with rates of 66.7% and 61.1% (OR: 8.46; CI: 2.46-29.00; p = 0.001/OR: 6.41; CI: 2.05-20.03; p = 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

MS adjustability improved success rates, especially among irradiated patients and those with previous US. RT was an adverse predictor of total continence status even after readjustments.

Neurological sphincter deficiency: is there a place for artificial urinary sphincter?

PURPOSE

Neurogenic stress urinary incontinence (N-SUI) is a condition with serious impact on the quality of life. There are several treatment modalities of which the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) stands out as the most suitable technique for addressing sphincter insufficiency. In this article, the purpose is to describe practical considerations, outcomes, and complications of the artificial urinary sphincter in neurological sphincter deficiency in both males and females.

METHODS

A narrative review of the current literature.

RESULTS

The outcomes of AUS are reasonably good in patients with NLUTD, the surgical technique is discussed as well as the limitations and special considerations in this complex and heterogeneous patient population.

CONCLUSION

The available evidence suggests that its efficacy and functional durability may be lower in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) compared to those without neurological deficits. However, studies have shown that AUS can still provide effective and safe continence outcomes in both male and female patients, with long-term device survival rates ranging from several years to over a decade.

[Use of implants to treat male urinary incontinence]

Treatments for benign and malignant pathologies of the prostate can compromise urine control. Urinary incontinence (UI) affects the quality of life of patients and limits their ability to carry out usual activities. The degree of impact of UI is variable and the associated discomforts make patients seek treatment for it. At the center of the management of urinary incontinence in men are surgical interventions that seek to replace the affected sphincter function through implants. The artificial urinary sphincter since its development in the 1970s has been considered the standard of treatment for UI in men. More recently artificial sphincter and slings have been shown to be effective in a selected group of incontinent men. The goals of surgical treatment of incontinence include the preservation of bladder function, the ability to improve the strength of the urinary sphincter, and to reduce or eliminate urine leakage, and thereby improve the quality of life. The aim of the article is to present various implants for the correction of male urinary incontinence.

Trends over 20 years of antimicrobial prophylaxis for artificial urinary sphincter surgery

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis is crucial for prevention of prosthesis and patient morbidity after artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement. While antibiotic guidelines exist for many urologic procedures, adoption patterns for AUS surgery are unclear. We aimed to assess trends in antibiotic prophylaxis for AUS and outcomes relative to American Urological Association (AUA) Best Practice guidelines.

METHODS

The Premier Healthcare Database was queried from 2000 to 2020. Encounters involving AUS insertion, revision/removal, and associated complications were identified via ICD and CPT codes. Premier charge codes were used to identify antibiotics used during the insertion encounter. AUS-related complication events were found using patient hospital identifiers. Univariable analysis between hospital/patient characteristics and use of guideline-adherent antibiotics was done via chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis tests. A multivariable logistic mixed effects model was used to assess factors related to the odds of complication, specifically the use of guideline-adherent versus nonadherent regimens.

RESULTS

Of 9775 patients with primary AUS surgery, 4310 (44.1%) received guideline-adherent antibiotics. The odds of guideline-adherent regimen use increased 7.7% per year with 53.0% (830/1565) receiving guideline-adherent antibiotics by the end of the study period. Patients with guideline-adherent regimens had a decreased risk of any complication (odds ratio [OR]: 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-0.93) and surgical revision (OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74-0.96) within 3 months; however, no significant difference in infection within was noted (OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.68-1.17) within 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to AUA antimicrobial guidelines for AUS surgery appears to have increased over the last two decades. While guideline-adherent regimens were associated with decreased risk of any complication and surgical intervention, no significant association was found with risk of infection. Surgeons appear to be increasingly following AUA recommendations for antimicrobial prophylaxis for AUS surgery, however, further level 1 evidence should be obtained to demonstrate conclusive benefit of these regimens.

Long-term results of artificial urinary sphincter implantation for urinary incontinence due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency in children

PURPOSE

To report long-term results of artificial urinary sphincter implantation for urinary incontinence due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective monocentric study included all patients who underwent artificial urinary sphincter (AMS 800) implantation before 18 years of age between 1986 and October 2018 for intrinsic sphincter deficiency. The primary outcome was the continence rate at the last follow-up, defined by the daily use of 0 pads. The secondary outcome was the overall survival of the device, defined as the absence of any repeated surgery (revision or explantation) during follow-up. Reoperation-free, revision-free, and explantation-free device survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients with a median age of 12 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 10-14) were included (15 females, 21 males). The median follow-up was 18.7 years (IQR: 9-26). The main underlying condition was spinal dysraphism (n = 24; 67%). The median time to the first reoperation was 9 years (IQR: 3.75-14.7). At the last follow-up, survival rates without revision were 84%, 71%, 55%, and 33% at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years, respectively. Survival rates without explantation were 91%, 84%, 80%, and 72% at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years, respectively. At the last follow-up, 29 patients had a functional device. The overall continence rate was 88%. All patients who had their device still in place were continent at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The artificial urinary sphincter is an effective long-term treatment for urinary incontinence related to intrinsic sphincter deficiency in children, providing a high rate of continence, even if associated with a high rate of reoperation.

Urethral Stricture Formation Following Cuff Erosion of AMS Artificial Urinary Sphincter Devices: Implication for a Less Invasive Explantation Approach

Objectives

The objective of this study is to describe a standardized less invasive approach in patients with artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) explantation due to cuff erosion and analyze success and urethral stricture rates out of a prospective database. Evidence regarding complication management is sparse with heterogenous results revealing high risk of urethral stricture formation despite simultaneous urethroplasty in case of AUS explantation.

Patients and Methods

Data of all patients undergoing AUS implantation due to stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in our tertiary center were prospectively collected from 2009 to 2015. In case of cuff erosion, AUS explantation was carried out in an institutional standardized strategy without urethroplasty, urethral preparation or mobilization nor urethrorrhaphy. Transurethral and suprapubic catheters were inserted for 3 weeks followed by radiography of the urethra. Further follow-up (FU) consisted of pad test, uroflowmetry, postvoiding residual urine (PVR), and radiography. Primary endpoint was urethral stricture rate.

Results

Out of 235 patients after AUS implantation, 24 (10.2%) experienced cuff erosion with consecutive explantation and were available for analysis. Within a median FU of 18.7 months after AUS explantation, 2 patients (8.3%) developed a urethral stricture. The remaining 22 patients showed a median Qmax of 17 ml/s without suspicion of urethral stricture. Median time to reimplantation was 4 months (IQR 3-4).

Conclusion

We observed a considerably low stricture formation and could not prove an indication for primary urethroplasty nor delay in salvage SUI treatment possibilities. Therefore, the presented standardized less invasive explantation strategy with consequent urinary diversion seems to be safe and effective and might be recommended in case of AUS cuff erosion.

Efficacy and safety of intradetrusor botulinum toxin injections for idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome in patients with an artificial urinary sphincter

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and safety of intradetrusor botulinum toxin type A injections (IBTI) for idiopathic overactive bladder (iOAB) in non-neurological adults with an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively selected, in the 11 French centers, members of a collaborative network (GENULF (Groupe d'étude de neuro-urologie de langue francaise)), the patients who had had an artificial urinary sphincter implantation and who had subsequently developed iOAB requiring IBTI. This study was approved by the French association of urology ethics committee (no 2018012).

RESULTS

Between 2006 and 2020, 33 patients were included from 5 French centers. Mean follow-up after the first IBTI was 47 months. The average age of the studied population was 68 years, with 70% of females. A complete resolution of symptoms at optimal IBTI dose was experienced by 21 (64%) patients. Seven (21%) patients had partial improvement. Five non-responder patients (15%) had no improvement at all. Maximum cystometric bladder capacity was 240 ml pre-IBTI and 335 ml post IBTI. Discontinuation free survival at 60 months was 50%. Two erosions occurred during the 6 months following an IBTI both in male patients with a perineal implantation. There were four AUS balloon perforations that occurred during the 6 months following an IBTI, all of them in female patients.

CONCLUSIONS

IBTI has a good efficacy for the treatment of iOAB in patients with an AUS. However, both patients and practicians must be aware of the risk of rare and usually mild complications.

Impact of radiation therapy on artificial urinary sphincter implantation in male patients: A multicenter study

AIMS

To evaluate the impact of an history of radiation therapy on the outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation in male patients.

METHODS

The charts of all patients who underwent AUS implantation for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after prostate surgery in thirteen centers between 2004 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. We excluded patients with neurogenic SUI. Continence rates and incidence of complications, revision and cuff erosion were evaluated. The outcomes in irradiated men were compared to those of non irradiated men.

RESULTS

A total of 1277 patients who had an AUS met the inclusion criteria with a median age of 70 years, of which 437 had an history of prior radiotherapy. There was no difference in comorbidities. In irradiated patients, postoperative social continence, urethral atrophy and infection rates were respectively 75.6%, 2.4% and 9.5% and 76.8%, 5.4%, and 5.8% in nonirradiated men (respectively, p = 0.799, p = 0.128, p = 0.148). There were more urethral erosion in irradiated male patients. After a mean follow up of 36.8 months, the explantation free survival was poorer in irradiated patients (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that pelvic radiotherapy before AUS adversely affect device survival with and increased greater occurrence of infection-erosion and therefore of explantation.

A case of pubic osteomyelitis after implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter: A case report

CASE

We describe a rare case of pubic osteomyelitis secondary to implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS). A 49-year-old man developed total urinary incontinence due to spinal cord injury 23 years earlier. After AUS implantation, he became continent. Fourteen years later, incontinence suddenly recurred.

OUTCOME

We planned to replace the dysfunctional AUS with a new one. We removed only the implanted control pump, leaving the urethral cuff at the bladder neck and pressure-regulating balloon to reduce surgical invasiveness, and performed AUS reimplantation. A new urethral cuff was placed around the bulbar urethra. Postoperatively, antibiotics, placement of a drainage catheter, and removal of the new AUS were required due to device infection. However, the infection persisted and magnetic resonance imaging showed inflammatory changes at the symphysis pubis, so osteotomy was performed to control infection. One year postoperatively, no gait disturbance or recurrence of pubic osteomyelitis was identified. AUS reimplantation was again performed and the patient is now socially continent.

CONCLUSIONS

We have reported a rare case of pubic osteomyelitis secondary to AUS implantation. Clinicians should suspect pubic osteomyelitis if infection persists.

Outcomes of robot-assisted urinary sphincter implantation for male neurogenic urinary incontinence

OBJECTIVES

To report the functional outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic artificial urinary sphincter implantation (R-AUS) in men with neurogenic stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A monocentric retrospective study included all consecutive adult male neuro-urological patients who underwent R-AUS for SUI between January 2011 and August 2018. The AUS was implanted via a transperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic approach. Intraoperative and early postoperative complications were reported (Clavien-Dindo classification). Continence was defined as no pad usage. Revision and explantation rates were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, 19 men with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 45 (37-54) years were included. No conversion to laparotomy was needed. Three minor (Clavien-Dindo Grade I-II) early postoperative complications occurring in three (15.8%) patients were reported. The median (IQR) follow-up was 58 (36-70) months. At the end of the follow-up, the continence rate was 89.5%. The AUS revision and explantation rates were 5.3% and 0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A R-AUS is a safe and efficient procedure for AUS implantation in adult male neuro-urological patients, referring to the challenging open technique.

[Künstliche Harnsphincter zur Behandlung von Stress-Harninkontinenz - eine oft nicht ausgelastete Behandlungsoption in Deutschland]

ABSTRAKT

Harninkontinenz ist in Deutschland weit verbreitet und betrifft Millionen von Frauen und Männern. Vor allem Männer, die postoperativ dauerhaft inkontinent sind, werden hierzulande trotz der ausreichenden Verfügbarkeit chirurgischer Optionen unterbehandelt. Der künstliche Schließmuskel wird seit Jahrzehnten erfolgreich zur Behandlung angeborener und erworbener Stress-Harninkontinenz bei Männern und Frauen sowie neurogener Harninkontinenz eingesetzt und wird in Form neuer Modelle weiterentwickelt. Aufgrund der guten Ergebnisse, Es gilt jetzt als Standardtherapie für Männer mit anhaltender, mittelschwerer bis schwerer Harninkontinenz. Die operationstechnische Technik ist anspruchsvoll, kann aber erlernt werden. Die meisten Komplikationen können in erfahrenen Händen deutlich reduziert werden. Patientenzufriedenheit mit künstlichen Harnsphinctern (AUS) ist hoch und korreliert mit der Kontinenzrate und nicht mit der relativ hohen Revisionsrate, weshalb diese Behandlungsoption in Deutschland zunehmend mehr Patienten mit mittelschwerer bis schwerer Harninkontinenz angeboten werden sollte. Urologen in der allgemeinen Praxis spielen in diesem Zusammenhang eine zentrale Rolle.

A Novel Artificial Urinary Sphincter (VICTO®) for the Management of Postprostatectomy Urinary Incontinence: Description of the Surgical Technique and Preliminary Results from a Multicenter Series

AIMS

The objective of the study was to analyze short-term outcomes and safety profile of the newly designed artificial urinary sphincters (AUSs) VICTO® and VICTOplus®.

METHODS

Data from the implant of VICTO® or VICTOplus® AUSs on a series of consecutive male patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) following radical prostatectomy (RP) were retrospectively collected in 3 tertiary referral centers between May 2017 and December 2019. Patients were affected by moderate-severe genuine SUI (200-400 or >400 g urine leakage in 24-h pad test) refractory to conservative treatment. Outcomes were evaluated through the 24-h pad test and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF). Follow-up was scheduled after 3, 6, and 12 months and then when clinically needed. Nonparametric tests were applied in subgroup analyses.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were enrolled: 8 were implanted with the VICTO® device and 9 with VICTOplus®. The median age at surgery was 69 (interquartile range (IQR) 60-75) years. The median follow-up was 15 (IQR 12-18) months. At 12 months, the dry rate was 76.4% and the social continence rate was 94%. The postoperative complication rate was 17.6%. All complications were classified as Clavien-Dindo I. No difference in terms of outcomes was observed between the VICTO® and the VICTOplus® subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary outcomes of the VICTO® and VICTOplus® implantation are satisfactory. These devices may represent a safe and realistic solution for patients with moderate-severe SUI following RP.

Artificial urinary sphincter: current status and future directions

Urge urinary incontinence (UUI) is one of the most troublesome complications of surgery of the prostate whether for malignancy or benign conditions. For many decades, there have been attempts to reduce the morbidity of this outcome with variable results. Since its development in the 1970s, the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) has been the “gold standard” for treatment of the most severe cases of UUI. Other attempts including injectable bulking agents, previous sphincter designs, and slings have been developed, but largely abandoned because of poor long-term efficacy and significant complications. The AUS has had several sentinel redesigns since its first introduction to reduce erosion and infection and increase efficacy. None of these changes in the basic AUS design have occurred in the past three decades, and the AUS remains the same despite newer technology and materials that could improve its function and safety. Recently, newer compressive devices and slings to reposition the bladder neck for men with mild-to-moderate UUI have been developed with success in select patients. Similarly, the AUS has had applied antibiotic coating to all portions except the pressure-regulating balloon (PRB) to reduce infection risk. The basic AUS design, however, has not changed. With newer electronic technology, the concept of the electronic AUS or eAUS has been proposed and several possible iterations of this eAUS have been reported. While the eAUS is as yet not available, its development continues and a prototype device may be available soon. Possible design options are discussed in this review.

Robot-assisted artificial urinary sphincter implantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of the present manuscript was to provide an overview on the current state of robotic artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation in male and female patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the past few years, several series have been reported, with promising outcomes for the most part. This has contributed to expand the use of bladder neck AUS, especially in female patients, which was, until then, hampered by its perioperative morbidity.

SUMMARY

Robotic AUS has been developed to overcome the technical challenge of bladder neck implantation in female patients and in specific male subgroups, especially self-catheterizing neurological patients. All the series of robotic AUS implantation published in the past few years reported much lower rates of cuff erosion and AUS explantation than the historical open cohorts suggesting that the robotic approach might become the standard for female AUS implantation. This less morbid approach along with technological improvement of the AUS device may contribute to make it a more popular option in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency. There are much less data available on robotic bladder neck AUS implantation in male patients.

Long-term outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter in female patients with spina bifida

AIMS

To report the long-term functional outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation in female patients with spinal dysraphism and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) related to intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD).

METHODS

The charts of all spina bifida female patients with SUI due to ISD who underwent AUS (AMS 800) implantation between 2005 and 2019 at three academic departments of urology were retrospectively reviewed. Reoperation was defined as either revision or explantation of the AUS device. Reoperation-free survival of the AUS device was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Continence status as per patients' subjective assessment was categorized as follows: complete continence (no pads), improved continence, unchanged SUI or worsened SUI.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were included, 69.6% were self-catheterizing. The median follow-up was 14 years. Median time to first reoperation was 10 years. Survival rates without reoperation were 85.9%, 41.8%, 34.6%, and 20.9% at 5, 10, 15, 20 years, respectively. Survival rates without AUS explantation were 90.7%, 66.3%, 55.2%, and 41.4% at 5, 10, 15, 20 years, respectively. None of the patients who underwent device explantation had a new AUS implanted. The only predictive factor of reoperation-free survival was the type of spinal dysraphism (hazards ratio = 3.60 for closed vs. open dysraphism; p = .04). At last follow-up, 17 of the 23 patients were fully continent (73.9%).

CONCLUSION

AUS in female patients with spina bifida may be associated with satisfactory long-term functional outcomes and a high reoperation rate. The median time to first reoperation was similar to what is reported in the male AUS literature (10 years).

Changing Trends in Management Following Artificial Urinary Sphincter Surgery for Male Stress Urinary Incontinence: An Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the safety and practice patterns of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement on a population level. Increasingly AUS implantation has shifted to be an outpatient surgery; however, there is a lack of large-scale research evaluating factors associated with early (≤ 24 hours) versus late (>24 hours) discharges and complications in men following AUS placement. We utilized the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database to identify and compare factors and outcomes associated with each approach.

METHODS

NSQIP database was queried for men undergoing AUS placement between 2007 and 2016. Patients were classified as either early discharge (ED ≤ 24 hours) and late discharge (LD > 24 hours). Baseline demographics, operating time, and complications were compared between the 2 groups. Multivariate logistic regression evaluated factors associated with discharge timing and 30-day complications.

RESULTS

A total of 1176 patients were identified and were classified as ED in 232 and LD in 944 patients. Operative time was shorter in ED (83 minutes) compared to LD (95 minutes, P < .001). Hypertension was more prevalent among LD patients (60.3% vs 69.1% for ED and LD respectively, P < .001). The 30-day complication rate was similar in both groups (ED: 4.3% vs LD: 3.4%, P = .498). Multivariable analysis revealed that surgery after 2012 was associated with ED (OR = 3.66, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

At the national level, there are no differences in postoperative morbidity between early and late discharges. There is a trend toward more ED, specifically after 2012. A prospective study on the feasibility and safety of outpatient AUS is needed.

Management of incontinence following pre-pubic urethrostomy in a cat using an artificial urethral sphincter

A 14-year-old male neutered domestic shorthair cat presented with a 4-year history of urinary incontinence following prepubic urethrostomy. Physical examination confirmed peristomal dermatitis, urine scalding and constant urine leakage. Haematology, serum biochemistry and urinalysis were unremarkable. Ultrasonography revealed a non-distended urinary bladder. An artificial urethral sphincter mechanism, with subsequent incremental inflation of the cuff 6 weeks later, resulted in complete resolution of clinical signs, return to normal urinary function and excellent quality of life. The cat was still continent at 5-year follow-up. Further studies including additional cases are required to highlight effectiveness and harms of the procedure.

Cadaveric Laboratory Simulation Training of Male Stress Urinary Incontinence Treatment Improves Trainee Knowledge and Confidence

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether a focused, simulation training course can improve trainee surgical knowledge and confidence in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Urology residents participated in a prosthetic education course as part of the 2018 SUPS and SMSNA annual meeting. The course included didactic lectures and a hands-on cadaveric laboratory. Participants completed questionnaires before and after the lab (2 weeks and 6 months) to assess procedural knowledge and confidence. Analysis of lab responses was performed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test for matched pairs.

RESULTS

Thirty-two residents (median age 29, range 27-34) participated in the course. The majority were postgraduate year 4 (63%) or postgraduate year 5 (20%). Most participants reported minimal AUS or sling experience with 50% and 94% reporting less than 5 cases, respectively. Overall score from the knowledge assessment improved significantly between the pre-lab versus 2-week post-lab (P = .02) and pre-lab versus 6-month post-lab (P = .01). Similarly, procedural confidence improved between pre-lab vs 2-week post-lab (P < .001) and pre-lab versus 6-month post-lab (P < .001). Knowledge and confidence assessments were not different between year of residency training or pre-lab experience.

CONCLUSIONS

Simulation training improves knowledge and confidence in prosthetic surgery for male stress incontinence. In the current climate of reduced exposure and limited availability of prosthetic educators, simulation courses can provide much needed educational value.

Current Perspectives on Complications of Surgical Treatments for Male Stress Urinary Incontinence

INTRODUCTION

Treatments for male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) include behavioral modifications, pelvic floor strengthening exercises, bulking agents, and surgical management. The most common surgical therapies for male stress incontinence include male slings and artificial urinary sphincters. Complications of these treatments are discussed in this review.

AIM

To review the current literature on SUI diagnosis and the management of common complications that occur after surgical treatments of male SUI.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using PubMed and Ovid to identify leading articles on the management of male SUI and the diagnosis and management of operative complications for male incontinence surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Main outcomes measured were complications and management strategies for operative complications after surgical therapies for male SUI.

RESULTS

26 publications were cited after an extensive review of the current literature on surgical treatment of male SUI. Commonly cited issues included infection, erosion, and recurrent incontinence after implantation of male slings and artificial urinary sphincters.

CONCLUSION

Complications are inherent to any surgery; a thorough understanding of complications and treatment strategies after surgery for male SUI is essential for the practicing clinical urologist. Shelton TM, Brimley S, Tsambarlis P, Hellstrom WJG. Current Perspectives on Complications of Surgical Treatments for Male Stress Urinary Incontinence. Sex Med Rev 2020;8:443-449.

Artificial Urinary Sphincter for Postradical Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence - Is It the Best Option?

Male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) can undoubtedly reduce quality of life and promote personal distress and psychosocial alienation. The frequency of postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPI) counts on the characterization of urinary incontinence and the periods of patient follow-up. Operational therapeutics, for instance, urethral male slings and artificial urinary sphincters, are well-chosen as adequate and secure surgeries for male SUI in men with continual PPI when conservative treatment is ineffective. Over the former 2 decades, surgery has progressed regarding both operative approach and sling architecture. However, there are no guidelines about when surgery should be carried out and which is the most appropriate surgical option. In this review, we summarize recent advances in implantable devices for PPI and also discuss traditional surgical care. When we are planning the male PPI surgery, careful preoperative work-up should be performed and surgical method should be chosen according to the severity of the disease. Male sling is preferred in mild and moderate symptomatic patients with normal detrusor pressure and it is recommended to select traditional artificial urinary sphincter device in those with severe symptoms. It is expected that effective devices without adverse events will be developed with technical advances in near future.

The use of implanted materials for treating women with pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the current clinical management of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse following the adverse complications seen in the use of polypropylene mesh to treat both.

RECENT FINDINGS

Materials developed for use in abdominal hernia repair have not proven risk-free when used to support pelvic organs particularly when inserted via the vagina. Following unacceptably high levels of severe complications when high-density polypropylene mesh is inserted via the vagina to treat pelvic organ prolapse, reported over the last decade, there is now an agreed consensus between surgeons about surgical approaches and materials, which should be recommended for use in stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse.

SUMMARY

There is a need for new biomaterials and tissue engineered/regenerative medicine approaches to treat stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. New materials need to be evaluated critically in both preclinical and clinical studies before being adopted into routine clinical use.

Artificial urinary sphincter revision with Quick Connects® versus suture-tie connectors: does technique make a difference?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate characteristics of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) mechanical failures and compare outcomes based on the use of either suture-tied connections or Quick-Connects^® (QC) for single-component revisions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 46 patients underwent single-component AUS revisions following primary AUS placement from January 1983 to January 2011 at our institute. Prior to 1996 all revision cases were performed with suture-tie connections and after that time we used QC for revisions. Device success was evaluated for a potential association with revision surgery including the type of connector used.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients underwent single-component revision surgery for primary device malfunction. In these cases, the tubing connections were performed using suture-tie connectors in 34 (74%), and QC in 12 (26%) cases. The median age was 68.8 years for suture-tie vs 70.6 years for QC (p=0.52). The median follow-up period after revision surgery was 24 months (IQR 7.2, 55.2). There was no statistically significant difference in 5-year device survival rates between suture-tie and QC (36% vs. 61%; p=0.85) techniques. There were no cases of device infection or repeat mechanical failure at the connector among cases of revision performed using QC, as compared to five device infections and four repeat mechanical failures among the suture-tie cohort.

CONCLUSION

The use of QC for single-component AUS revision for mechanical failures appears to be safe, efficient and reliable. There is not enough evidence supporting the presence of an association between connector type with the risk of overall device failure.

Voiding Dysfunction After Non-urologic Pelvic Surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Urinary dysfunction is a common entity in patients undergoing radical pelvic surgery for non-urologic malignancies. These dysfunctions may manifest as lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or signs such as urinary retention or leakage. Review of current literature is performed to describe the differing urinary dysfunctions that manifest after colorectal resection, hysterectomy, and sacrectomy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Conventional radical surgery for pelvic malignancies often will result in debilitating functional problems. As advances in surgical techniques and management options become more available, patients can have better functional outcomes, specifically in the lower urinary tract. Nerve-sparing techniques as well as vascular preservation are becoming more important to preserve function as patient survival is improving. Additionally, newer methods are being explored, such as nerve stimulation for those who are unable to empty adequately. This article also addresses different management options for specific voiding dysfunction that may result from pelvic surgery. Preventative strategies such as nerve preservation during surgery are an important concept to prevent urinary dysfunction. The goal to good functional outcomes includes maintaining reservoir compliance and capacity as well as allowing proper outlet for voiding. We discuss different modalities to help achieve a functional lower urinary tract for patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction after pelvic surgery.

Patterns and timing of artificial urinary sphincter failure

PURPOSE

To assess population-based trends in artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement after prostatectomy and determine the effect of timing on device survival and complications.

METHODS

We identified patients who underwent prostatectomy and AUS placement in SEER-Medicare from 2002 to 2011. We analyzed factors affecting the time of reoperation from AUS implantation and prostatectomy using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

In total, 841 men underwent AUS placement at a median 23 months after prostatectomy. Patients who underwent reoperation (28.5%) had higher clinical stage, more likely underwent open prostatectomy, or had prior sling placement (p < 0.03). There were no differences in rates of diabetes, smoking status, prior radiation therapy, or Charlson Comorbidity Index between those requiring reoperation vs. not (all p > 0.15). Patients with AUS placement > 15 months after prostatectomy (75%) initially experienced less need for operative reinterventions. Patients with later AUS placement were significantly more likely to have received radiation therapy [22.9 vs. 3.8% (p < 0.01)]. Nonetheless, late implantation was confirmed to be protective on multivariate analysis during the first 5 years after AUS placement [HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.67-0.92); p < 0.01]. Factors independently associated with a shorter interval time until reoperation included history of radiation [HR 1.93 (95% CI 1.33-2.80); p < 0.01] and history of prior sling [HR 1.70 (95% CI 1.08-2.68); p = 0.02]. Even for patients who underwent radiation therapy, delayed AUS implantation reduced reoperative risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Late AUS implantation in the Medicare population is associated with prolonged device survival initially, while radiation and prior sling surgery predict for earlier reoperation. Patients with delayed AUS implantation experience less immediate complications. Further work is required to identify patient-specific factors which may explain variability in timing for AUS.

Urethral pressure controlled balloon refilling or balloon change for artificial sphincter secondary procedure?

OBJECTIVES

To report our experience of inflating or changing pressure balloon to treat recurrent urinary incontinence after AMS800^® implantation instead of changing all the devices.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary reference center between 2005 and 2015. All patients, treated by AMS800^® implantation for post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence and whom balloon was subsequently changed or inflated, were included. Main clinical end point was the need for another surgery. Secondary end points were urethral erosion, infection, and efficacy on pad test and pad use.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were included. All had had a 61-70cm H₂0 balloon implanted, with a single cuff (13 with transcorporeal placement). Twenty-one patients had their balloon changed for a 71-80cm H₂0 type, while 10 patients had their balloon refilled (median 3mL [range 2-7]). Median follow-up was 23 months (range 1-129). Overall rate of another subsequent surgery was 48.3% (n=15). Erosion and atrophy occurred more frequently after balloon repressurizing than after balloon replacement (80% vs 33%, P=0.024). At last follow-up, median pad use was higher in repressurizing group (2 vs 1, P=0.033).

CONCLUSION

Balloon repressurizing is associated with a higher erosion and reoperation rate than changing pressure balloon. Continence results seem better when PRB is changed. It could be an alternative instead of changing all devices in patients with frail urethra.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

[Urodynamic studies prior to urinary incontinence surgery : What is useful?]

Surgery is often necessary after failure of conservative therapy for urinary incontinence. Guidelines recommend urodynamic studies before surgery. A distinction is made between non-invasive (uroflowmetry) and invasive methods (cystometry and pressure-flow study, if necessary as combined videourodynamics, as well as urethral pressure profile). All examinations serve to objectify and quantify the symptoms, to correctly assign symptoms to the pathophysiology and anatomy as well as to identify risk factors, which often have a significant influence on the success of surgical therapy. Given appropriate experience, complications and often significant sequelae of bladder dysfunction affecting the patient's quality of life and life expectancy can be recognized. Urodynamic studies are performed to help narrow down potential diagnoses, to develop therapeutic strategies, and to obtain prognostic parameters. The following article is intended to provide some support.

Artificial Urinary Sphincter in Male Patients with Spina Bifida: Comparison of Perioperative and Functional Outcomes between Bulbar Urethra and Bladder Neck Cuff Placement

PURPOSE

We evaluated the perioperative and long-term functional outcomes of bladder neck and peribulbar cuff placement of an artificial urinary sphincter in a population of adult male patients with spinal dysraphism.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the French spina bifida network database. Patients who underwent implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter from January 1985 to November 2015 were selected and stratified into 2 groups according to cuff location, that is bladder neck vs bulbar urethra. Explantation-free and revision-free device survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log rank test. Cox regression models were created to assess prognostic factors of artificial urinary sphincter device failure.

RESULTS

A total of 65 patients were included in study. Most patients were not wheelchair bound. The cuff was implanted around the bulbar urethra at 46 procedures (59%) and around the bladder neck in 32 (41%). In the peribulbar and bladder neck groups median revision-free device survival was 11.7 and 14.3 years, respectively (p = 0.73). Median explantation-free device survival was 18.5 and 24.5 years, respectively (p = 0.08). On multivariate analysis clean intermittent catheterization was the only predictor of artificial urinary sphincter device failure. Cuff location had no influence. At the last followup satisfactory continence was similar in the 2 groups (83% vs 75%, p = 0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

In male patients with spinal dysraphism morbidity and functional outcomes were similar for bladder neck and bulbar urethra cuff placement but with a trend toward longer survival without explantation in the bladder neck group. Clean intermittent catheterization was the only predictor of shorter device survival on multivariate analysis.

Artificial urinary sphincter

Although currently still the gold standard treatment for post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence, the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) (AMS800) is an invasive procedure with associated risks factors. In this paper, we aim to outline what the scientific literature and what we personally believe are the factors that are useful and/or necessary to mitigate these risks, including both patient factors and surgeon factors. We also review special populations, including transcorporal (TC) AUS approach, AUS with inflatable penile prosthesis, AUS after male urethral sling, AUS erosion management, and AUS after orthotopic urinary diversion.

Preoperative Urine Culture Results Correlate Poorly With Bacteriology of Urologic Prosthetic Device Infections

INTRODUCTION

Although preoperative negative urine culture results and treatment of urinary tract infections are generally advised before artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) and penile prosthesis (PP) surgery to prevent device infection, limited evidence exists to support this practice.

AIM

To evaluate the relation between preoperative urine culture results and the bacteriology of prosthetic device infections.

METHODS

Men undergoing AUS and/or PP placement at a tertiary referral center from 2007 through 2015 were analyzed. A total of 713 devices were implanted in 681 patients (337 AUSs in 314 patients and 376 PPs in 367 patients), of whom 259 (36%) did not have preoperative urine culture and were excluded. The remaining 454 patients received standard broad-spectrum perioperative antibiotics. Two patient groups were identified based on preoperative urine cultures: group 1 had negative urine culture results and group 2 had untreated asymptomatic positive urine culture results identified postoperatively.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Device infection was diagnosed clinically and cultures obtained from the explanted device and tissue spaces were compared with preoperative urine culture results.

RESULTS

Although multivariate analysis showed that patients undergoing AUS placement had a 4.5-fold greater risk of positive urine culture results (114 of 250, 45%) compared with those undergoing PP placement (36 of 204, 18%; P < .001), infection rates between device types were similar (8 of 250 for AUSs [3%] and 7 of 204 for PPs [3%]; P = .89). At a median follow-up of 15 months, device infection occurred in 15 of 454 devices (3%) implanted and no differences in infection rates were noted between urine culture groups (10 of 337 in group 1 [3.3%] and 5 of 117 in group 2 [4.3%]; P = .28). Remarkably, only 1 of 15 device infections (7%) had the same organism present at preoperative urine culture.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the finding that patients with AUS placement had a 4.5 times higher rate of positive urine culture results than patients with PP placement, preoperative urine culture results appeared to show little correlation with the bacteriology of prosthetic device infections.

Contemporary surgical devices for male stress urinary incontinence: a review of technological advances in current continence surgery

Male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) remains a debilitating condition that adversely impacts all domains of quality of life and is associated with significant social stigma and health economic burden. The incidence of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPI) depends on the definition of urinary incontinence and the length of patient follow up. In patients with persistent PPI following failure of conservative measures, surgical treatment is recommended although there is no published guideline on when surgery should be performed, and what the best surgical option is. Male slings (MS) can be divided into adjustable or non-adjustable types, and offers an attractive option for patients who wish to avoid mechanical handling during urinary voiding. Published intermediate data supports good safety and efficacy rate in men with mild to moderate degree of SUI. The AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) remains the standard of treatment for complete continence and has the longest efficacy and safety records. Other AUS-like devices are designed to address current AMS 800 limitations but themselves are fraught with their own issues.

Artificial urinary sphincters for male stress urinary incontinence: current perspectives

The artificial urinary sphincter (AUS), which has evolved over many years, has become a safe and reliable treatment for stress urinary incontinence and is currently the gold standard. After 4 decades of existence, there is substantial experience with the AUS. Today AUS is most commonly placed for postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence. Only a small proportion of urologists routinely place AUS. In a survey in 2005, only 4% of urologists were considered high-volume AUS implanters, performing >20 per year. Globally, ~11,500 AUSs are placed annually. Over 400 articles have been published regarding the outcomes of AUS, with a wide variance in success rates ranging from 61% to 100%. Generally speaking, the AUS has good long-term outcomes, with social continence rates of ~79% and high patient satisfaction usually between 80% and 90%. Despite good outcomes, a substantial proportion of patients, generally ~25%, will require revision surgery, with the rate of revision increasing with time. Complications requiring revision include infection, urethral atrophy, erosion, and mechanical failure. Most infections are gram-positive skin flora. Urethral atrophy and erosion lie on a spectrum resulting from the same problem, constant urethral compression. However, these two complications are managed differently. Mechanical failure is usually a late complication occurring on average later than infection, atrophy, or erosions. Various techniques may be used during revisions, including cuff relocation, downsizing, transcorporal cuff placement, or tandem cuff placement. Patient satisfaction does not appear to be affected by the need for revision as long as continence is restored. Additionally, AUS following prior sling surgery has comparable outcomes to primary AUS placement. Several new inventions are on the horizon, although none have been approved for use in the US at this point.