Seroimmunological characteristics of Korean workers exposed to toluene diisocyanate

Risk Assessment for Toluene Diisocyanate and Respiratory Disease Human Studies

BACKGROUND

Toluene diisocyanate (TDI) is a highly reactive chemical that causes sensitization and has also been associated with increased lung cancer. A risk assessment was conducted based on occupational epidemiologic estimates for several health outcomes.

METHODS

Exposure and outcome details were extracted from published studies and a NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluation for new onset asthma, pulmonary function measurements, symptom prevalence, and mortality from lung cancer and respiratory disease. Summary exposure-response estimates were calculated taking into account relative precision and possible survivor selection effects. Attributable incidence of sensitization was estimated as were annual proportional losses of pulmonary function. Excess lifetime risks and benchmark doses were calculated.

RESULTS

Respiratory outcomes exhibited strong survivor bias. Asthma/sensitization exposure response decreased with increasing facility-average TDI air concentration as did TDI-associated pulmonary impairment. In a mortality cohort where mean employment duration was less than 1 year, survivor bias pre-empted estimation of lung cancer and respiratory disease exposure response.

CONCLUSION

Controlling for survivor bias and assuming a linear dose-response with facility-average TDI concentrations, excess lifetime risks exceeding one per thousand occurred at about 2 ppt TDI for sensitization and respiratory impairment. Under alternate assumptions regarding stationary and cumulative effects, one per thousand excess risks were estimated at TDI concentrations of 10 - 30 ppt. The unexplained reported excess mortality from lung cancer and other lung diseases, if attributable to TDI or associated emissions, could represent a lifetime risk comparable to that of sensitization.

Pro/Con debate: Is occupational asthma induced by isocyanates an immunoglobulin E-mediated disease?

Isocyanates, low-molecular weight chemicals essential to polyurethane production, are one of the most common causes of occupational asthma, yet the mechanisms by which exposure leads to disease remain unclear. While isocyanate asthma closely mirrors other Type I Immune Hypersensitivity (Allergic) disorders, one important characteristic of hypersensitivity ('allergen'-specific IgE) is reportedly absent in a large portion of affected individuals. This variation from common environmental asthma (which typically is induced by high-molecular weight allergens) is important for two reasons. (1) Allergen-specific IgE is an important mediator of many of the symptoms of bronchial hyper-reactivity in 'allergic asthma'. Lack of allergen-specific IgE in isocyanate hypersensitive individuals suggests differences in pathogenic mechanisms, with potentially unique targets for prevention and therapy. (2) Allergen-specific IgE forms the basis of the most commonly used diagnostic tests for hypersensitivity (skin prick and RAST). Without allergen-specific IgE, isocyanates may go unrecognized as the cause of asthma. In hypersensitive individuals, chronic exposure can lead to bronchial hyperreactivity that persists years after exposure ceases. Thus, the question of whether or not isocyanate asthma is an IgE-mediated disease, has important implications for disease screening/surveillance, diagnosis, treatment and prevention. The present Pro/Con Debate, addresses contemporary, controversial issues regarding IgE in isocyanate asthma.

Issues in diisocyanate antibody testing

Diisocyanates are used to produce a wide variety of polyurethane products; they are also recognized as an important cause of occupational asthma. Their chemical reactivity presents challenges to toxicologists and clinicians alike seeking to understand the mechanisms underlying diisocyanate asthma. In this article, we review the literature on immunoassay detection of IgE and IgG binding to diisocyanate-protein conjugates and assess the utility of such testing as a diagnostic tool and exposure indicator. Data from 29 studies of occupational exposure to diisocyanates revealed considerable variability in assay methodology and heterogeneity in the prevalence of positive antibody responses across laboratories. In studies that included both confirmed diisocyanate asthma subjects and exposed nonasthmatics, positive IgE responses identified cases with low sensitivity (18-27%), but high specificity (96-98%). Detection of IgG binding to diisocyanate conjugates is an indirect, qualitative indicator of disease status and past diisocyanate exposure. The utility of these assays is limited, however, due to a lack of (1) method standardization, (2) population norms to guide interpretation of results, and (3) demonstration that the assays improve either on disease prediction or on exposure confirmation beyond that of other indicators. Sources of assay heterogeneity are discussed and suggestions are offered for improving test performance and interpretability.

Recent developments in diisocyanate asthma

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the latest experimental findings on diisocyanate asthma and discuss the impact of these data on our understanding of disease pathogenesis and diagnosis.

DATA SOURCES

The literature reviewed includes articles from PubMed (National Library of Medicine) published within the last 3 years (1999-2001). In addition, pertinent older references are discussed to provide a historical perspective and background.

STUDY SELECTION

The data discussed were chosen to highlight key concepts relevant to diisocyanate asthma pathogenesis and are grouped accordingly.

RESULTS

In many ways, diisocyanate-induced asthma mirrors allergic asthma caused by other stimuli; however, the immune-mediated pathways believed to be central to the disease have been difficult to define. Recent studies on the human immune response to diisocyanates provide additional evidence supportive of an immune basis for pathogenesis but also highlight well-recognized differences between diisocyanate asthma and common atopic asthma. Studies on the antigenic form of diisocyanates and their interaction with epithelial tissues provide new insights that may help explain these apparent immunologic differences. Genetic factors that influence disease have begun to be identified but remain poorly characterized. Associations of particular major histocompatibility complex class II alleles with diisocyanate asthma further fuel the hypothesis that immune-dependent mechanisms underlie pathogenesis, whereas associations of glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms (in conjunction with recent studies defining the effects of diisocyanates on thiol-redox homeostasis) may implicate additional antigen-independent mechanisms. Long-term follow-up studies of diisocyanate asthma patients have confirmed the prognostic value of early removal of symptomatic patients from exposure and highlight the need for effective diagnostic tests of sensitivity and susceptibility.

CONCLUSIONS

Diisocyanate-induced asthma appears to be a multifactorial disease involving the immune system, airway epithelium, and genetic factors. The potential long-term adverse effects of diisocyanate exposure in sensitized patients underscore the need for further studies to elucidate the pathogenesis of this disease and identify biomarkers for sensitization and susceptibility.

Biomarkers of toluene diisocyanate exposure

Biomarkers are very useful tools when the metabolic fate of the compound or the etiology of a resultant disease is completely understood. They may contribute to confusion if it is not possible to distinguish between markers of exposure and markers of disease. Such is the case for biomarkers used in the assessment of diisocyanate exposure. Biomarkers for diisocyanate exposure result from both direct and indirect effects. Molecules such as hemoglobin, albumin, tubulin, glutathione, and laminin have been implicated as having been directly modified as a result of exposure to toluene diisocyanate (TDI). In addition, indirect biomarkers have included profiles of molecules such as antibodies, cytokines, cell accumulation or proliferation, and markers of oxidative stress. While a brief presentation of each of these markers is provided here, the focus is primarily on immunological markers as an example of the difficulties with using biomarkers in assessing diisocyanate exposure in general, and TDI specifically. Compiled data will be used to demonstrate where gaps exist in our understanding of how the results of measured biomarkers are used with regard to isocyanate exposure, and whether it may be possible to develop these tools to define thresholds between exposure and disease. Issues addressed include whether the marker represents a measure of exposure or disease, whether the methods are sufficiently uniform between labs to be able to compare between studies, and whether the ambiguities are the result of the complexity of the isocyanate reactivity in the biological system, or our inability to accurately measure the end point of the reactions.

Occupational asthma, lung function decrement, and toluene diisocyanate (TDI) exposure: a critical review of exposure-response relationships

An extensive amount of clinical/epidemiological literature exists regarding the effects of toluene diisocyanate (TDI) exposure on respiratory health. This review presents an evaluation and synthesis of that literature with an emphasis on assessing exposure-response relationships in the workplace. The key respiratory disorders examined are bronchial asthma and an accelerated decline in lung function. In the early years of the industry, annual incidence rates of TDI-induced occupational asthma (OA) were as high as 5-6 percent. In settings where mean TDI concentrations have been maintained below 5 ppb based on 8-hr personal samples, OA incidence rates have declined to < 1 percent annually. Recent data also suggest that overexposure incidents may play an important role in inducing OA, particularly in work environments engineered to minimize routine ambient air concentrations. Fourteen studies were reviewed that examined lung function decrement. Early studies from the 1960s and 1970s provided evidence of transient or fixed lung function loss (measured as a decline in forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1]) during periods of ongoing exposure among employees experiencing high rates of work-related symptoms of OA. Such findings would not be unexpected in that modest FEV1 declines have been demonstrated in general population studies of persons with bronchial hyperresponsiveness or persistent non-occupational asthma. More recent workplace studies have provided no consistent evidence of accelerated FEV1 loss among employees exposed up to 5 ppb TDI (8-hr TWA) even with documented routine short-term TDI concentrations exceeding 20 ppb TDI.

Effects of long-term solvent exposure on blood cytokine levels and antioxidant enzyme activities in house painters

The aim of this study was to examine solvent-associated effects on blood cytokine levels, antioxidant enzyme activities, and malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration in house painters. Trace element (Cu and Zn) and nitrite and nitrate levels as well as protein concentrations in erythrocytes and serum were determined. Thirty male house painters and 30 male clerical workers were included in the study. There were 13 smokers and 17 nonsmokers in each group. Hemoglobin concentrations were significantly lower in house-painter blood compared to controls. House painters had significantly higher concentrations of erythrocyte protein (excluding hemoglobin), whereas no significant difference was observed between serum protein levels. Proinflammatory cytokine levels, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-8, were significantly increased in house painters' sera. Interleukin-6 was below the detection limit of the assay in both groups. Interleukin-1beta and cytokine receptor interleukin 2R concentrations were not significantly affected. Furthermore, a three- to fourfold increase in nitrite and nitrate concentrations was found in house painters' sera. Serum superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GSHPx) activities were significantly lower in house painters compared to controls. Malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration, a measure of lipid peroxidation, was found to be significantly elevated. In house painters, erythrocyte carbonic anhydrase and catalase activities were elevated approximately 11- fold and 2-fold, respectively. Zinc levels were significantly decreased in house painters' sera. Smoking was not found to be a major confounder for the association between solvent exposure and blood parameters.

Toxicologic considerations in the diagnosis of occupational asthma

BACKGROUND

The consideration of dose for chemicals inducing occupational asthma is examined from the point of view of a toxicologist. Two widely used chemicals in industry, toluene diisocyanate (TDI) and formaldehyde, are used as examples of agents that are formally recognized by OSHA to cause occupational asthma. The Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of OSHA and the Threshold Limit Value (TLV) of ACGIH for TDI are identical and are in the range of values for which occupational asthma has been reported in some workers. The narrow range of exposure values for TDI in studies of workers with and without asthma is discussed and correlated with the background concentration of TDI in the ambient atmosphere. For formaldehyde, the PEL and TLV, in contrast, offer a wide margin of safety for the inducement of occupational asthma.

CONCLUSION

From this disparity in exposure limits for TDI and formaldehyde, it is concluded that occupational exposure limits by agencies for specific chemicals do not provide a reliable indication of the concentration of a chemical that is necessary to produce occupational asthma. The need for a better appreciation of dose response, particularly relative to background, ambient levels, in the evaluation of occupational asthma is emphasized.