The investigation of the factors affecting retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis in stage IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian cancer

Comparative evaluation of the risk of malignancy index scoring systems (1-4) used in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses

BACKGROUND

To determine the cut-off values of the preoperative risk of malignancy index (RMI) used in differentiating benign or malignant adnexal masses and to determine their significance in differential diagnosis by comparison of different systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

191 operated women were assessed retrospectively. RMI of 1, 2, 3 and 4; cut-off values for an effective benign or malignant differentiation together with sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values were calculated.

RESULTS

Cut-off value for RMI 1 was found to be 250; there was significant (p<0.001) compatibility at this level with sensitivity of 60%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 75%, specificity of 93%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 88% and an overall compliance rate of 85%. When RMI 2 and 3 was obtained with a cut-off value of 200, there was significant (p<0.001) compatibility at this level for RMI 2 with sensitivity of 67%, PPV of 67%, specificity of 89%, NPV of 89%, histopathologic correlation of 84% while RMI 3 had significant (p<0.001) compatibility at the same level with sensitivity of 63%, PPV of 69%, specificity of 91%, NPV of 88% and a histopathologic correlation of 84%. Significant (p<0.001) compatibility for RMI 4 with a sensitivity of 67%, PPV of 73%, specificity of 92%, NPV of 89% and a histopathologic correlation of 86% was obtained at the cut-off level 400.

CONCLUSIONS

RMI have a significant predictability in differentiating benign and malignant adnexal masses, thus can effectively be used in clinical practice.

Vascular endothelial growth factor c promotes ovarian carcinoma progression through paracrine and autocrine mechanisms

Vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGFC) has been reported to promote tumor progression in several tumor types, mainly through the stimulation of lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis. However, the expression and biological significance of the VEGFC/VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-3 pathway in ovarian cancer growth and dissemination are unclear, and have been investigated in this study. Soluble VEGFC was detected in the plasma and ascites of patients with ovarian carcinoma, and VEGFR3 expression was found in their tumor tissues. In human ovarian carcinoma xenograft models, high levels of soluble VEGFC in ascites and serum were detected, in association with disease progression, tumor burden, and volume of ascites. Peak VEGFC expression preceded para-aortic lymph node infiltration by HOC8 neoplastic cells. Histological detection of tumor cells in blood and lymphatic vessels indicated both hematogenous and lymphatic dissemination. Overexpression of VEGFC in the VEGFR3-positive and luciferase-expressing IGROV1 cells promoted carcinoma dissemination after orthotopic transplantation in the ovary of immunodeficient mice. In vitro, VEGFC released by the tumor cells stimulated tumor cell migration in an autocrine manner. Cediranib, an inhibitor of VEGFR1-3 and c-kit, inhibited in vivo metastasis of VEGFC-overexpressing IGROV1 and in vitro autocrine effects. These findings suggest that the VEGFC/VEGFR3 pathway acts as an enhancer of ovarian cancer progression through autocrine and paracrine mechanisms, hence offering a potential target for therapy.

Clinical observation on the efficacy of CyberKnife for primary or metastatic retroperitoneal tumours

The aim of the paper is to evaluate the efficacy of CyberKnife® for the treatment of primary or metastatic retroperitoneal tumours. Twenty-eight patients were treated. The prescription isodose line (median, 78%; range, 70-84%) covered the planning target volume at a total dose of 2000-6000 cGy (median, 4500 cGy) and a biologically effective dose of 3750-10,080 cGy (median, 7680 cGy) in 2-10 fractions (median, five fractions). The results showed that the complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease rates were 43% (12/28), 36% (10/28), 18% (5/28), and 4% (1/28) respectively. The overall response rate was 96%. The 1-, 2- and 3-year local control rates were 92%, 86%, and 86% respectively. The 1-, 2- and 3-year overall survival rates were 60%, 49%, and 49% respectively. No significant difference was found between local progression-free survival and overall survival. Moreover, if a patient only had metastases in the retroperitoneum and local control was effective, there was no significant difference between local progression-free survival and overall progression-free survival. In conclusion, CyberKnife treatment for retroperitoneal tumours resulted in high response rates with minimal side effects. All radiation-induced side effects were well tolerated.

Complete lymph node dissection: is it essential for the treatment of borderline epithelial ovarian tumors?

OBJECTIVE

The present study aims to compare the clinical and reproductive outcomes of women who have undergone lymph node dissection with those who have not and to discuss the indications for retroperitoneal evaluation in the treatment of borderline ovarian tumors.

METHODS

The present study investigated 123 women who were finally diagnosed with borderline epithelial ovarian tumors at the study center between January 1999 and January 2009. A total of 68 patients (55.3%) were found to have a complete surgical staging procedure.

RESULTS

The patients who underwent complete lymph node dissection were significantly younger than those who did not have lymphadenectomy. Thus, the ratio of postmenopausal women was significantly higher among those in whom retroperitoneal evaluation was performed. As expected, the intraoperative blood loss was significantly more and the hospital stay was significantly longer in patients who underwent complete lymph node dissection. Also, the non-serous borderline ovarian tumors were significantly more frequent in the latter patient group. However, overall and disease-free survival spans were found to be statistically similar for both study groups as well as the recurrence rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Retroperitoneal evaluation can be spared in every woman with borderline ovarian tumor unless she is to undergo complete surgical staging procedure because of high recurrence risk, advanced stage disease or personal choice.