Immunohistochemical distinction of metastases of renal cell carcinoma to the adrenal from primary adrenal nodules, including oncocytic tumor

Application of TFE3 Immunophenotypic and TFE3 mRNA Expressions in Diagnosis and Prognostication of Adrenal Cortical Neoplasms and Distinction From Kidney Tumors

We explored the application of TFE3 immunostaining and TFE3 mRNA expression in the differential diagnosis and prognostication of adrenal cortical tumors and distinction of the latter from clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) which show significant morphologic overlap. TFE3 immunostaining was performed on a large cohort of samples including 40 adrenal cortex tissues, 95 adrenocortical adenoma (ACA), 11 adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC), 53 ccRCC, and 18 pheochromocytomas. TFE3 was compared with other immunomarkers melan-A, inhibin-α, synaptophysin, chromogranin A, CAIX and CD10. One hundred percent normal adrenal cortices and 94% ACA were strongly and diffusely stained for TFE3 while no ACC showed diffuse staining. TFE3 is thus useful in distinguishing ACA from ACC. TFE3 is also useful in separating ACC from ccRCC as 64% ACC showed partial, while only 7% of ccRCC showed partial TFE3 staining. Only 1 pheochromocytoma showed focal weak TFE3 staining. Results also demonstrated superiority of TFE3 over other commonly used immunomarkers. TFE3 gene rearrangement testing by fluorescence in situ hybridization showed no rearrangement in 6 TFE3 positive adrenal tumors. TFE3 mRNA were analyzed by the Cancer Genome Atlas database and we found TFE3 mRNA expression correlated with overall patient survival in ACC. Our study showed usefulness of TFE3 in distinguishing ACA from ACC, and ACC from ccRCC. TFE3 is superior over other commonly used immunomarkers for adrenal tumors. In addition, decreased TFE3 immunoexpression and TFE3 mRNA expression may carry poor prognostic implication in adrenal tumors.

Oncocytic adrenocortical tumor with uncertain malignant potential in pediatric population: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Oncocytic adrenocortical tumor (OACT) is rare, with few cases reported in the literature. No more than 20 cases in children have been reported. The clinical characteristics, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of children with OACT are summarized based on a literature review, in order to improve the understanding of OACT in children.

CASE SUMMARY

We report a case of a 17-mo-old patient who was admitted to our hospital due to symptoms of odynuria and fever, which are clinical features consistent with a functional adrenocortical tumor. The patient was diagnosed with OACT of uncertain malignant potential. Computed tomography indicated a soft tissue giant tumor in the right adrenal region, approximately 4.3 cm × 5.5 cm in size. Multiple nodular and speckled calcifications were observed in the lesion. The patient received robot-assisted laparoscopic right adrenal tumor resection. Postoperative pathological results were consistent with OACT, and immunohistochemical results showed cytokeratin^+/-, chromogranin A⁺, synaptophysin^-, neuron-specific enolase^-, S100^-, Ki67 about 10%, CD34^- and D2-40^-. After surgery, urinary tract ultrasonography was reviewed monthly, catecholamine hormone and sex hormone levels were examined every 2 mo and computed tomography was performed every 6 mo. To date, no tumor metastasis or recurrence has been identified in this patient. The levels of sex hormones and catecholamine hormones decreased to normal 1 mo after surgery.

CONCLUSION

OACT is rare in the pediatric population, with few cases reported in the literature. Although most pediatric OACTs are benign, malignant cases have been reported. Surgical resection is the preferred option in most patients.

Clear cell clusters in the kidney: a rare finding that should not be misdiagnosed as renal cell carcinoma

Clear cytoplasm is a major characteristic feature of most malignant renal neoplasms. Benign clear cells in the renal parenchyma, usually histiocytes, can occasionally be found, but they are infrequently of an epithelial nature. We report histological, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and cytogenomic features of clear epithelial cell clusters incidentally found in four kidney specimens. Multiple microscopic clear cell clusters were present in the cortex, often in subcapsular location. They were composed of large epithelial cells with strikingly clear cytoplasm, without nuclear atypia, arranged in solid nests, and some tubules with narrow lumina. Immunohistochemically, they were positive for AE1AE3, PAX 8, EMA, kidney-specific cadherin, cytokeratin 7, E cadherin, and CD117, with focal immunoreactivity for CD10. Carbonic anhydrase IX, vimentin, and markers related to apoptosis and proliferation were negative. Ultrastructurally, the cytoplasms were enlarged and poor in organelles, showing ballooning degeneration. Array comparative genomic hybridization showed no chromosomal gains or losses. Clear cell clusters constitute a rare finding in the kidney and must be differentiated from benign lesions (ectopic adrenal tissue, osmotic tubulopathy, histiocytic clusters, renal adenomas) and renal cell carcinomas. Clear cell clusters appear to be generated from "endocrine-type" atrophic tubules whose cells are enlarged due to intracellular oedema. Immunohistochemistry shows a distal nephron phenotype with a limited expression of a proximal marker, CD10. Coexisting chronic renal disease or ischemic conditions seem to be related to the development of clear cell clusters. Pathological, ultrastructural, and cytogenomic features do not support a preneoplastic nature of this lesion, at least in the cases studied here.

Adrenocortical neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential with a myelolipomatous component

Macroscopic fat inside an adrenal lesion on CT is pathognomonic for myelolipoma, a benign neoplasm. Without macroscopic fat, it can be difficult to discern the nature of an indeterminate adrenal mass on imaging. One possible diagnosis for an indeterminate lesion without macroscopic fat is an adrenal oncocytic neoplasm (AON). Despite its typical benign presentation cases of malignant AON have been reported. Patients with malignant AON are often not surgical candidates and survival for unresected disease is 20%-35%. We present the third report of an AON of uncertain malignant potential (AONUMP) associated with a macroscopic fatty component with the largest reported size and longest duration of follow-up in the literature. This report details diagnostic and therapeutic challenges posed by AONUMP. This case highlights how pathognomonic radiographical findings associated with benign myelolipoma might mask rare, potentially malignant, lipomatous tumours.

An Algorithmic Immunohistochemical Approach to Define Tumor Type and Assign Site of Origin

Immunohistochemistry represents an indispensable complement to an epidemiology and morphology-driven approach to tumor diagnosis and site of origin assignment. This review reflects the state of my current practice, based on 15-years' experience in Pathology and a deep-dive into the literature, always striving to be better equipped to answer the age old questions, "What is it, and where is it from?" The tables and figures in this manuscript are the ones I "pull up on the computer" when I am teaching at the microscope and turn to myself when I am (frequently) stuck. This field is so exciting because I firmly believe that, through the application of next-generation immunohistochemistry, we can provide better answers than ever before. Specific topics covered in this review include (1) broad tumor classification and associated screening markers; (2) the role of cancer epidemiology in determining pretest probability; (3) broad-spectrum epithelial markers; (4) noncanonical expression of broad tumor class screening markers; (5) a morphologic pattern-based approach to poorly to undifferentiated malignant neoplasms; (6) a morphologic and immunohistochemical approach to define 4 main carcinoma types; (7) CK7/CK20 coordinate expression; (8) added value of semiquantitative immunohistochemical stain assessment; algorithmic immunohistochemical approaches to (9) "garden variety" adenocarcinomas presenting in the liver, (10) large polygonal cell adenocarcinomas, (11) the distinction of primary surface ovarian epithelial tumors with mucinous features from metastasis, (12) tumors presenting at alternative anatomic sites, (13) squamous cell carcinoma versus urothelial carcinoma, and neuroendocrine neoplasms, including (14) the distinction of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma from well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor, site of origin assignment in (15) well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor and (16) poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, and (17) the distinction of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor G3 from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma; it concludes with (18) a discussion of diagnostic considerations in the broad-spectrum keratin/CD45/S-100-"triple-negative" neoplasm.

Steroid Receptor Coactivator-1 Expression in Pheochromocytoma: Clinicopathologic Correlation and Potential Diagnostic Pitfall

Pheochromocytoma is a relatively uncommon tumor, and the histomorphologic and biochemical features that may portend malignant behavior have poor overall consensus across various proposed classification systems. Steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) is a nuclear protein that mediates transcriptional activity. Current diagnostic applications of SRC-1 are limited, and include distinguishing adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) from renal cell carcinoma, and other mimickers. SRC-1 expression in pheochromocytoma has not been previously studied. Pheochromocytoma cases were retrieved from our Urological Pathology database and expert consultation files of the senior author, from 2015 to 2019. Clinicopathological data were obtained. SRC-1 expression was scored systematically. Thirty-eight cases were included, with a female predominance, and a mean age of 52 years (range, 16 to 75 y). Seven patients had heritable mutations including RET (n=3), VHL (2), SDHB (1), and ATM and PDGFRA (1). Two patients developed clinical metastasis, who individually had ATM and PDGFRA mutations, and SDHB p.V140F mutation. All heritable tumors were positive for SRC-1, including diffuse/strong staining and intensity in the VHL cases, and diffuse staining with variable intensity in RET cases. Diffuse positivity was seen in most of our heritable cases, providing evidence for a putative link between RET and downstream SRC-1 signaling. An inverse relationship was observed between SRC-1 expression and Pheochromocytoma of the Adrenal Gland Scaled Score/tumor size, suggesting that SRC-1 phenotype may become muted in pheochromocytomas that have malignant potential. SRC-1 expression in aggressive pheochromocytomas, may also be a potential diagnostic pitfall in view of the fact that these tumors may be misinterpreted as ACC in the primary or metastatic setting.

Renal cell carcinoma staging: pitfalls, challenges, and updates

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is unusual among cancers in that it often grows as a spherical, well-circumscribed mass. Increasing tumour size influences the pathological pT stage category within pT1 and pT2, with cutoffs of 40, 70 and 100 mm; however, with increasing size also comes a sharp increase in the likelihood of renal sinus or renal vein tributary invasion, such that clear cell RCC rarely reaches 70 mm without invading one of these. To clarify some previous challenges in assigning tumour stage, the American Joint Committee on Cancer 2016 tumor-node-metastasis classification has removed the requirements than vein invasion be recognised grossly and that vein walls contain muscle for the diagnosis of vein invasion. Renal pelvis invasion has also been added as an additional route to pT3a. Multinodularity or finger-like extensions from a renal mass should be viewed with great suspicion for the possibility of vein or renal sinus invasion, and, as tumour size increases to over 40-50 mm, thorough sampling of the renal sinus interface should always be undertaken. With increasing interest in adjuvant therapy in renal cancer, the pathologist's role in RCC staging will continue to be an important prognostic parameter and a tool for selection of patients for enrolment in clinical trials.

Adrenocortical oncocytic neoplasm: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Adrenocortical oncocytic neoplasms are rare tumors, generally regarded as benign and hormonally nonfunctional. We performed a systematic review to update the literature on adrenocortical oncocytic neoplasms by reviewing patient and tumor characteristics, as well as management trends, because the literature is composed of predominately single-case reports.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library through June 2017. Malignant potential was determined by applying the Lin-Weiss-Bisceglia criteria to cases.

RESULTS

Included for analysis were 84 citations describing 140 adrenocortical oncocytic neoplasms, including our own case. These were diagnosed predominantly in females (66%), on the left side (64%), and were nonfunctional (66%). Average age at diagnosis was 44 years (2.5-77), and median tumor size was 80 mm (16-285). A total of 35% of adrenocortical oncocytic neoplasms were benign, 41% borderline, and 24% malignant. Male patients were more likely to have a malignant tumor compared with females (36% versus 18%, P = .035). The 5-year overall survival for benign adrenocortical oncocytic neoplasms was 100%, borderline 88%, and malignant 47%. Hormonal function did not discriminate malignant from benign lesions. Adrenocortical oncocytic neoplasms that stained positive for synaptophysin (50%, P < .001) and negative for vimentin (62%, P = .009) are more often benign.

CONCLUSION

We found that the majority of adrenocortical oncocytic neoplasms (65%) were either malignant or had malignant potential, contrary to the previous literature. The Lin-Weiss-Bisceglia criteria are useful in identifying those patients for whom closer surveillance is warranted, because their prognosis is dependent on the Lin-Weiss-Bisceglia diagnosis.

Differentiating Intrarenal Ectopic Adrenal Tissue From Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Kidney

BACKGROUND

Adrenal rest (AR) is the presence of ectopic adrenal cortical tissue, often identified incidentally during autopsy (20% of postmortem examination). In the kidney, AR can be found in 6% of the general population. Ectopic adrenal tissue is of no functional significance but may in some cases, pose a diagnostic challenge for the pathologist, especially in the context of renal clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and small needle biopsies.

AIM

To investigate the utility of immunohistochemical stains in distinguishing AR from RCC.

METHODS

Archival cases of AR, in our institution, were reviewed and compared with a cohort of RCC cases using a panel of immunohistochemical stains, including PAX2, PAX8, calretinin, and inhibin.

RESULTS

Nine of 10 (90%) cases of AR showed positive staining for inhibin and negative staining for calretinin, PAX2 and PAX8. One AR case was positive for PAX2 and PAX8 in addition to inhibin. All (100%) RCC cases were positive for PAX2 and PAX8, but negative for inhibin and calretinin.

CONCLUSIONS

A panel of PAX2, PAX8 and inhibin may be useful markers for distinguishing AR from RCC. Calretinin was noncontributory in our study.

Integrating omics data and protein interaction networks to prioritize driver genes in cancer

Although numerous approaches have been proposed to discern driver from passenger, identification of driver genes remains a critical challenge in the cancer genomics field. Driver genes with low mutated frequency tend to be filtered in cancer research. In addition, the accumulation of different omics data necessitates the development of algorithmic frameworks for nominating putative driver genes. In this study, we presented a novel framework to identify driver genes through integrating multi-omics data such as somatic mutation, gene expression, and copy number alterations. We developed a computational approach to detect potential driver genes by virtue of their effect on their neighbors in network. Application to three datasets (head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC), thyroid carcinoma (THCA) and kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC)) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), by comparing the Precision, Recall and F1 score, our method outperformed DriverNet and MUFFINN in all three datasets. In addition, our method was less affected by protein length compared with DriverNet. Lastly, our method not only identified the known cancer genes but also detected the potential rare drivers (PTPN6 in THCA, SRC, GRB2 and PTPN6 in KIRC, MAPK1 and SMAD2 in HNSC).

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma without evidence of a renal primary

PURPOSE

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), without an identified kidney primary, has been reported rarely. We report a patient with RCC metastatic to bilateral adrenal glands and liver, without an apparent renal primary. We detail the immunohistochemical and molecular studies employed to substantiate the diagnosis of RCC and direct therapy.

METHODS

Histopathologic findings were correlated with imaging data and supplemented by a panel of immunohistochemical stains, as well as tumor sequence analysis.

RESULTS

Despite the presence of bilateral adrenal masses and lack of tumor within kidney parenchyma, the diagnosis of RCC was substantiated by immunohistochemistry (RCC+/PAX2+/PAX8+/Melan-A-/SF-1- among others) and molecular genetic analysis, harboring mutations in VHL, TP53, KDM5C, and PBRM1. After debulking surgery, based on the diagnosis of RCC and the molecular profile, the patient was treated with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (sunitinib), resulting in stablilization of disease.

CONCLUSIONS

This case illustrates the role of mutational analysis in carcinomas with rare or unusual presentations, such as metastatic RCC without a renal primary.