Does intraoperative CT navigation increase the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in pediatric spinal deformity surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Higher Accuracy and Better Clinical Outcomes in Navigated Thoraco-Lumbar Pedicle Screw Fixation Versus Conventional Techniques : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to compare pedicle screw accuracy, clinical outcomes, and complications between navigated and conventional techniques.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

In the last decades, intraoperative navigation has been introduced in spinal surgery to prevent risks and complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The search was executed on Cochrane Central Library, PubMed, and Scopus on April 30, 2023. Randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective studies that compared pedicle screw accuracy in the thoracic-lumbar-sacral segments, blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, intraoperative and postoperative revision of screws, neurological and systemic complications, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) between navigated and freehand or fluoroscopy-assisted techniques were included in this study. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager software. Clinical outcomes were assessed as continuous outcomes with mean difference, while pedicle screw accuracy and complications were assessed as dichotomous outcomes with odds ratio, all with 95% CIs. The statistical significance of the results was fixed at P <0.05.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 30 studies for a total of 17,911 patients and 24,600 pedicle screws. Statistically significant results in favor of the navigated technique were observed for the accuracy of pedicle screws ( P =0.0001), hospital stay ( P =0.0002), blood loss ( P <0.0001), postoperative revision of pedicle screws ( P <0.00001), and systemic complications ( P =0.0008). In particular, the positioning of the screws was clinically acceptable in 96.2% of the navigated group and 94.2% with traditional techniques. No significant differences were found in VAS, ODI, and operative time between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Navigated pedicle screw fixation has been demonstrated to be a safe and effective technique with high improvement in clinical outcomes and accuracy in patients undergoing spinal fusion compared with conventional techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

SafeRPlan: Safe deep reinforcement learning for intraoperative planning of pedicle screw placement

Spinal fusion surgery requires highly accurate implantation of pedicle screw implants, which must be conducted in critical proximity to vital structures with a limited view of the anatomy. Robotic surgery systems have been proposed to improve placement accuracy. Despite remarkable advances, current robotic systems still lack advanced mechanisms for continuous updating of surgical plans during procedures, which hinders attaining higher levels of robotic autonomy. These systems adhere to conventional rigid registration concepts, relying on the alignment of preoperative planning to the intraoperative anatomy. In this paper, we propose a safe deep reinforcement learning (DRL) planning approach (SafeRPlan) for robotic spine surgery that leverages intraoperative observation for continuous path planning of pedicle screw placement. The main contributions of our method are (1) the capability to ensure safe actions by introducing an uncertainty-aware distance-based safety filter; (2) the ability to compensate for incomplete intraoperative anatomical information, by encoding a-priori knowledge of anatomical structures with neural networks pre-trained on pre-operative images; and (3) the capability to generalize over unseen observation noise thanks to the novel domain randomization techniques. Planning quality was assessed by quantitative comparison with the baseline approaches, gold standard (GS) and qualitative evaluation by expert surgeons. In experiments with human model datasets, our approach was capable of achieving over 5% higher safety rates compared to baseline approaches, even under realistic observation noise. To the best of our knowledge, SafeRPlan is the first safety-aware DRL planning approach specifically designed for robotic spine surgery.

Computer Assisted Navigation Does Not Improve Outcomes in Posterior Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of CT-based computer assisted navigation (CAN) to conventional pedicle screw placement for patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study drew data from the National Readmissions Database, years 2016-2019. Patients undergoing posterior fusion for AIS, either via CAN or fluoroscopic-guided procedures, were identified via ICD-10 codes. Multivariate regression was performed to compare outcomes between operative techniques. Negative binomial regression was used to asses discharge disposition, while Gamma regression was performed to assess length of stay (LOS) and total charges. Patient demographics and comorbidities, measured via the Elixhauser comorbidity index, were both controlled for in our regression analysis.

RESULTS

28,868 patients, 2095 (7.3%) undergoing a CAN procedure, were included in our analysis. Patients undergoing CAN procedures had increased surgical complications (Odds Ratio (OR) 2.23; P < 0.001), namely, blood transfusions (OR 2.47; P < 0.001). Discharge disposition and LOS were similar, as were reoperation and readmission rates; however, total charges were significantly greater in the CAN group (OR 1.37; P < 0.001). Mean charges were 191,489.42 (119,302.30) USD for conventional surgery vs 268 589.86 (105,636.78) USD for the CAN cohort.

CONCLUSION

CAN in posterior fusion for AIS does not appear to decrease postoperative complications and is associated with an increased need for blood transfusions. Given the much higher total cost of care that was also seen with CAN, this study calls into question whether the use of CAN is justified in this setting.

Safety of robotic-assisted screw placement for spine surgery: Experience from the initial 125 cases

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to evaluate the safety of robot-assisted screw placement in 125 cases after introducing a spinal robotics system and to identify the situations where deviation was likely to occur.

METHODS

The subjects were 125 consecutive patients who underwent robotic-assisted screw placement using a spinal robotics system (Mazor X Stealth Edition, Medtronic) from April 2021 to January 2023. The 1048 screws placed with robotic assistance were evaluated. We investigated intraoperative adverse events of the robotics system and complications occurring within 30 days after surgery. We evaluated screw accuracy and deviation and compared them for vertebral levels, screw insertion methods (open traditional pedicle screw [Open-PS], cortical bone trajectory screw [CBT], percutaneous pedicle screw [PPS], and S2 alar iliac screw [S2AIS]), diagnosis, and phases of surgical cases.

RESULTS

The deviation rate of robotic-assisted screw placement for spine surgery was 2.2%. Complications were reoperation due to implant-related neurological deficit in 0.8% and surgical site infection in 0.8%. There was significant difference in the deviation rate between vertebral levels. The deviation rate of the T1-T4 level was high at 10.0%. There was significant difference in the deviation rate between Open-PS, CBT, PPS, and S2AIS. The PPSs had a high deviation rate of 10.3%. The deviation rates were not significantly different between patients with and without deformity. The deviation rate did not change depending on the experience of surgical cases, and the deviation rate was favorable from the onset.

CONCLUSION

Although the robotic-assisted screw placement was safe, we should be extra vigilant when placing screws in the upper thoracic region (deviation rate 10.0%) and when using PPSs (deviation rate 10.3%).

Comparison of iCT-based navigation and fluoroscopic-guidance for atlantoaxial screw placement in 78 patients with traumatic cervical spine injuries

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Studies have shown biomechanical superiority of cervical pedicle screw placement over other techniques. However, accurate placement is challenging due to the inherent risk of neurovascular complications. Navigation technology based on intraoperative 3D imaging allows highly accurate screw placement, yet studies specifically investigating screw placement in patients with traumatic atlantoaxial injuries are scarce. The aim of this study was to compare atlantoaxial screw placement as treatment of traumatic instabilities using iCT-based navigation or fluoroscopic-guidance with intraoperative 3D control scans.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of patients with traumatic atlantoaxial injuries treated operatively with dorsal stabilization of C1 and C2. Patients were either assigned to the intraoperative navigation or fluoroscopic-guidance group. Screw accuracy, procedure time, and revisions were compared.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients were included in this study with 51 patients in the navigation group and 27 patients in the fluoroscopic-guidance group. In total, 312 screws were placed in C1 and C2. Screw accuracy was high in both groups; however, pedicle perforations > 1 mm occurred significantly more often in the fluoroscopic-guidance group (P = 0.02). Procedure time was on average 23 min shorter in the navigation group (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

This study contributes to the available data showing that navigated atlantoaxial screw placement proves to be feasible as well as highly accurate compared to the fluoroscopic-guidance technique without prolonging the time needed for surgery. When comparing these data with other studies, the application of different classification systems for assessment of screw accuracy should be considered.

Intraoperative navigation increases the projected lifetime cancer risk in patients undergoing surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a common condition, often requiring surgical correction. Computed tomography (CT) based navigation technologies, which rely on ionizing radiation, are increasingly being utilized for surgical treatment. Although this population is highly vulnerable to radiation, given their age and female predominance, there is little available information elucidating modeled iatrogenic cancer risk.

PURPOSE

To model lifetime cancer risk associated with the use of intraoperative CT-based navigation for surgical treatment of AIS.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This retrospective cross-sectional study took place in a quaternary care academic pediatric hospital in the United States.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Adolescents aged 10-18 who underwent posterior spinal fusion for a diagnosis of AIS between July 2014 and December 2019.

OUTCOMES MEASURES

Effective radiation dose and projected lifetime cancer risk associated with intraoperative doses of ionizing radiation.

METHODS

Clinical and radiographic parameters were abstracted, including total radiation dose during surgery from flat plate radiographs, fluoroscopy, and intraoperative CT scans. Multivariable regression analysis was used to assess differences in radiation exposure between patients treated with conventional radiography versus intraoperative navigation. Radiation exposure was translated into lifetime cancer risk using well-established algorithms.

RESULTS

In total, 245 patients were included, 119 of whom were treated with navigation. The cohort was 82.9% female and 14.4 years of age. The median radiation exposure (in millisieverts, mSv) for fluoroscopy, radiography, and navigation was 0.05, 4.14, and 8.19 mSv, respectively. When accounting for clinical and radiographic differences, patients treated with intraoperative navigation received 8.18 mSv more radiation (95%CI: 7.22-9.15, p<.001). This increase in radiation projects to 0.90 iatrogenic malignancies per 1,000 patients (95%CI 0.79-1.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Ours is the first work to define cancer risk in the setting of radiation exposure for navigated AIS surgery. We project that intraoperative navigation will generate approximately one iatrogenic malignancy for every 1,000 patients treated. Given that spine surgery for AIS is common and occurs in the context of a multitude of other radiation sources, these data highlight the need for radiation budgeting protocols and continued development of lower radiation dose technologies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Pedicle screw accuracy placed with assistance of machine vision technology in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis

INTRODUCTION

Pedicle screws are the primary method of vertebral fixation in scoliosis surgery, but there are lingering concerns over potential malposition. The rates of pedicle screw malposition in pediatric spine surgery vary from 10% to 21%. Malpositioned screws can lead to potentially catastrophic neurological, vascular, and visceral complications. Pedicle screw positioning in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis is challenging due to a combination of large curves, complex pelvic anatomy, and osteopenia. This study aimed to determine the rate of pedicle screw malposition, associated complications, and subsequent revision from screws placed with the assistance of machine vision navigation technology in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis undergoing posterior instrumentation and fusion.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis of the records of patients with neuromuscular scoliosis who underwent thoracolumbar pedicle screw insertion with the assistance of machine-vision image guidance navigation was performed. Screws were inserted by either a staff surgeon, orthopaedic fellow, or orthopaedic resident. Post-operative ultra-low dose CT scans were used to assess pedicle screw accuracy. The Gertzbein classification was used to grade any pedicle breaches (grade 0, no breach; grade 1, <2 mm; grade 2, 2-4 mm; grade 3, >4 mm). A screw was deemed accurate if no breach was identified (grade 0).

RESULTS

25 patients were included in the analysis, with a mean age of 13.6 years (range 11 to 18 years; 13/25 (52.0%) were female. The average pre-operative supine Cobb angle was 90.0 degrees (48-120 degrees). A total of 687 screws from 25 patients were analyzed (402 thoracic, 241 lumbosacral, 44 S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screws). Surgical trainees (fellows and orthopaedic residents) inserted 46.6% (320/687) of screws with 98.8% (4/320) accuracy. The overall accuracy of pedicle screw insertion was 98.0% (Grade 0, no breach). All 13 breaches that occurred in the thoracic and lumbar screws were Grade 1. Of the 44 S2AI screws placed, one screw had a Grade 3 breach (2.3%) noted on intra-operative radiographs following rod placement and correction. This screw was subsequently revised. None of the breaches resulted in neuromonitoring changes, vessel, or visceral injuries.

CONCLUSION

Machine vision navigation technology combined with careful free-hand pedicle screw insertion techniques demonstrated high levels of pedicle screw insertion accuracy, even in patients with challenging anatomy.

The Impact of Unplanned Reoperation Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study with 5-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

The long-term impact of reoperations following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery is still poorly understood. Our aim was to identify the relationship between unplanned reoperation and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) gain at 2 and 5 years of follow-up.

METHODS

We included patients enrolled in a prospective ASD database who underwent surgery ≥5 years prior to the start of the study and who had 2 years of follow-up data. Adverse events (AEs) leading to an unplanned reoperation, the time of reoperation occurrence, invasiveness (blood loss, surgical time, hospital stay), and AE resolution were assessed. HRQoL was measured with use of the Oswestry Disability Index, Scoliosis Research Society-22, and Short Form-36. Linear models controlling for baseline data and index surgery characteristics were utilized to assess the relationships between HRQoL gain at 2 and 5-year follow-up and the number and invasiveness of reoperations. The association between 5-year HRQoL gain and the time of occurrence of the unplanned reoperation and that between 5-year HRQoL gain and AE resolution were also investigated.

RESULTS

Of 361 eligible patients, 316 (87.5%) with 2-year follow-up data met the inclusion criteria and 258 (71.5%) had 5-year follow-up data. At the 2-year follow-up, 96 patients (30.4%) had a total of 165 unplanned reoperations (1.72 per patient). At the 5-year follow-up, 73 patients (28.3%) had a total of 117 unplanned reoperations (1.60 per patient). The most common cause of reoperations was mechanical complications (64.9%), followed by surgical site infections (15.7%). At the 5-year follow-up, the AE that led to reoperation was resolved in 67 patients (91.8%). Reoperation invasiveness was not associated with 5-year HRQoL scores. The number of reoperations was associated with lesser HRQoL gain at 5 years for all HRQoL measures. The mean associated reduction in HRQoL gain per unplanned reoperation was 41% (range, 19% to 66%). Reoperations resulting in no resolution of the AE or resolution with sequelae had a greater impact on 5-year follow-up HRQoL scores than reoperations resulting in resolution of the AE.

CONCLUSIONS

A postoperative, unplanned reoperation following ASD surgery was associated with lesser gain in HRQoL at 5 years of follow-up. The association did not diminish over time and was affected by the number, but not the magnitude, of reoperations. Resolution of the associated AE reduced the impact of the unplanned reoperation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Top 25 Most Cited Articles on Intraoperative Computer Tomography-Guided Navigation in Spine Surgery

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the use of intraoperative computer tomography-guided (CT-guided) navigation has gained significant popularity among health care providers who perform minimally invasive spine surgery. This review aims to identify and analyze trends in the literature related to the widespread adoption of CT-guided navigation in spine surgery, emphasizing the shift from conventional fluoroscopy-based techniques to CT-guided navigation.

METHODS

Articles pertaining to this study were identified via a database review and were hierarchically organized based on the number of citations. An "advanced document search" was performed on September 28th, 2022, utilizing Boolean search operator terms. The 25 most referenced articles were combined into a primary list after sorting results in descending order based on the total number of citations.

RESULTS

The "Top 25" list for intraoperative CT-guided navigation in spine surgery cumulatively received a total of 2742 citations, with an average of 12 new citations annually. The number of citations ranged from 246 for the most cited article to 60 for the 25th most cited article. The most cited article was a paper by Siewerdsen et al., with 246 total citations, averaging 15 new citations per year.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative CT-guided navigation is 1 of many technological advances that is used to increase surgical accuracy, and it has become an increasingly popular alternative to conventional fluoroscopy-based techniques. Given the increasing adoption of intraoperative CT-guided navigation in spine surgery, this review provides impactful evidence for its utility in spine surgery.

Freehand Technique for Pedicle Screw Placement during Surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Is Associated with Less Ionizing Radiation Compared to Intraoperative Navigation

PURPOSE

We aim to compare radiation exposure and implant-related complications of the freehand (FH) technique versus intraoperative image-guided navigation (IN) for pedicle screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and estimate associated lifetime attributable cancer risks.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 40 consecutive AIS patients treated with pedicle screw instrumentation using the FH technique was performed. The dose area product (DAP) and effective dose (ED) were calculated. Screw-related complications were analysed, and the age- and gender-specific lifetime attributable cancer risks were estimated. The results were compared to previously published data on IN used during surgery for AIS.

RESULTS

There were no implant-related complications in our cohort. Implant density was 86.6%. The mean Cobb angle of the main curve was 75.2° (SD ± 17.7) preoperatively and 27.7° (SD ± 10.8) postoperatively. The mean ED of our cohort and published data for the FH technique was significantly lower compared to published data on the IN technique (p < 0.001). The risk for radiogenic cancer for our FH technique AIS cohort was 0.0014% for male patients and 0.0029% for female patients. Corresponding risks for IN were significantly higher (p < 0.001), ranging from 0.0071 to 0.124% and from 0.0144 to 0.253% for male and female patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The routine use of intraoperative navigation in AIS surgery does not necessarily reduce implant-related complications but may increase radiation exposure to the patient.

Accuracy of imaging grading in comparison to open laminectomy to evaluate pedicle screws positioning

Study design

Prospective experimental study.

Objective

To compare the accuracy of O-Arm-acquired radiographic and computed tomography (CT) evaluation of thoracic pedicle screw placement with open laminectomy in a simulation laboratory.

Summary of background data

Improving surgical safety and procedural efficiency during thoracic posterior spine instrumentation is essential for decreasing complication rates and possible related risks. The most common way of verifying the position of pedicle screws during the surgical procedure and immediately postoperatively is to acquire intraoperative fluoroscopic images and plain radiographs of the spine, respectively. Laboratory simulated surgery is a valuable tool to evaluate the accuracy of those exams.

Methods

Twenty simulation models of scoliosis from T3 to T7 were instrumented by five spine fellows (total of 200 pedicle screws), followed by radiographic and CT images acquired with the assistance of the O-Arm which were evaluated by three independent raters. A fellowship-trained spine neurosurgeon performed laminectomies on the instrumented levels and assessed pedicle integrity (gold standard).

Results

Forty-eight breaches were identified in the axial direct view after laminectomy. Of those, eighteen breaches were classified as unacceptable. Regarding the sagittal direct view, four breaches were observed, three of which were classified as unacceptable. Overall, both O-arm radiographic and CT evaluations had a significantly high negative predicted value but a low positive predicted value to identify unacceptable breaches, especially in the sagittal plane. The frequency of missed breaches by all three examiners was high, particularly in the sagittal plane.

Conclusion

Postoperative evaluation of pedicle screws using O-arm-acquired radiographic or CT images may underdiagnose the presence of breaches. In our study, sagittal breaches were more difficult to diagnose than axial breaches. Although most breaches do not have clinical repercussions, this study suggests that this modality of postoperative radiographic assessment may be inaccurate.

Level of evidence

4.

Assessing Procedural Accuracy in Lateral Spine Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis of Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement with Intraoperative CT Navigation

Percutaneous pedicle screws (PPSs) are commonly used in posterior spinal fusion to treat spine conditions such as trauma, tumors, and degenerative diseases. Precise PPS placement is essential in preventing neurological complications and improving patient outcomes. Recent studies have suggested that intraoperative computed tomography (CT) navigation can reduce the dependence on extensive surgical expertise for achieving accurate PPS placement. However, more comprehensive documentation is needed regarding the procedural accuracy of lateral spine surgery (LSS). In this retrospective study, we investigated patients who underwent posterior instrumentation with PPSs in the thoracic to lumbar spine, utilizing an intraoperative CT navigation system, between April 2019 and September 2023. The system's methodology involved real-time CT-based guidance during PPS placement, ensuring precision. Our study included 170 patients (151 undergoing LLIF procedures and 19 trauma patients), resulting in 836 PPS placements. The overall PPS deviation rate, assessed using the Ravi scale, was 2.5%, with a notably higher incidence of deviations observed in the thoracic spine (7.4%) compared to the lumbar spine (1.9%). Interestingly, we found no statistically significant difference in screw deviation rates between upside and downside PPS placements. Regarding perioperative complications, three patients experienced issues related to intraoperative CT navigation. The observed higher rate of inaccuracies in the thoracic spine suggests that various factors may contribute to these differences in accuracy, including screw size and anatomical variations. Further research is required to refine PPS insertion techniques, particularly in the context of LSS. In conclusion, this retrospective study sheds light on the challenges associated with achieving precise PPS placement in the lateral decubitus position, with a significantly higher deviation rate observed in the thoracic spine compared to the lumbar spine. This study emphasizes the need for ongoing research to improve PPS insertion techniques, leading to enhanced patient outcomes in spine surgery.

Comparison of Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Surgery in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Between Robotics and Navigation: An Analysis Using Propensity Score Matching

Purpose This study aimed to compare the radiographic and patient-reported outcomes after surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) between robotics and navigation using propensity score matching. Methods This retrospective study involved 50 patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for AIS between October 2016 and August 2022, utilizing navigation or robotic systems, analyzing them using propensity score matching. The evaluations included assessments using X-ray, Scoliosis Research Society 22-Item (SRS-22) Questionnaire, and CT, considering variables such as age, gender, BMI, and Lenke type. Results Post matching, 13 cases each from robotics and navigation groups were compared. No significant differences were found in the demographic variables, preoperative X-ray parameters, and preoperative SRS-22 scores between the two groups. The robotics group demonstrated a higher perfect accuracy rate (94.0% vs. 84.7%, p=0.005) and a lower deviation rate in pedicle screw placements (1.6% vs. 4.1%, p=0.223). At one year postoperatively, there were no significant differences in the X-ray parameters between both groups. Likewise, no significant differences were found in each domain of SRS-22, but function, self-image, mental health, and satisfaction scores were numerically higher in the robotics group. Conclusion The application of a spinal robotic system in AIS surgery presented enhanced screw accuracy and lower deviation rates, compared to navigation, with no significant differences observed in the X-ray parameters and each domain of SRS-22 at one year postoperatively. This suggests that, to improve patient quality of life (QOL), it is essential for robotic-assisted spine surgery to focus not only on screw accuracy but also on the development of novel robotic-assisted techniques.

Learning curve across 2000 thoracolumbar pedicle screw placements using O-arm navigation: technical difficulties and their solutions

INTRODUCTION

Instrumentation using the intraoperative O-arm navigation technique appears safer than its predecessor techniques. However, only a handful of surgeons often used navigation during spinal surgeries. Too many operative glitches and unreliable navigation accuracy were the important reasons cited even by experienced surgeons for not using spinal navigation. We have studied the accuracy of pedicle screw placement during the learning curve and beyond it. We have also discussed in detail the intricacies of the technique and solutions to the difficulties encountered using spinal navigation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 2000 thoracolumbar pedicle screws have been placed in the 324 spine surgeries meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria included in this retrospective study. We have divided 2000 pedicle screw placements into consecutive groups of 200 each. We have compared these groups for the accuracy of screw placement with the surgeon's experience.

RESULTS

The accuracy of pedicle screw placement using the "in-versus-out" grading system in group 1 was 85.5% which significantly increased in group 2 to 93.5% (p-value: 0.0099), and thereafter, there was a nonsignificant increase in subsequent groups with the graph achieving the shape of a plateau.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons should learn the correct principles of the technique of O-arm navigation to prevent the loss of accuracy and place pedicle screws with high accuracy. There is a learning curve of around 30-35 surgeries or 200 pedicle screw placements to acclimatize with the technique of O-arm navigation and learn its principles.

Emerging Technologies within Spine Surgery

New innovations within spine surgery continue to propel the field forward. These technologies improve surgeons' understanding of their patients and allow them to optimize treatment planning both in the operating room and clinic. Additionally, changes in the implants and surgeon practice habits continue to evolve secondary to emerging biomaterials and device design. With ongoing advancements, patients can expect enhanced preoperative decision-making, improved patient outcomes, and better intraoperative execution. Additionally, these changes may decrease many of the most common complications following spine surgery in order to reduce morbidity, mortality, and the need for reoperation. This article reviews some of these technological advancements and how they are projected to impact the field. As the field continues to advance, it is vital that practitioners remain knowledgeable of these changes in order to provide the most effective treatment possible.

Change of vertebral orientation, between the supine position and the prone position

PURPOSE

Our aim was to assess the change of vertebral orientation, expressed in the sagittal plane, in the transversal plane and in the frontal plane, at each level from T1 to S1 between the supine position (like in in a CT scan) and the prone position lying on bolsters like in an OR.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients were selected and included for a total number of one hundred and forty-eight vertebral levels. There were 30 females and 6 males. The mean age was 15 years and 9 months. A semi-automatic image processing technique and software (3D slicer), with a custom-made python script add-on, was used for each patient: paired preoperative CT scan and intraoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan were processed to acquire complete spinal reconstructions in a consistent 3D coordinate system. The aim was to automatically compute a set of sagittal, transversal, and frontal rotations of each vertebral level of the same patient describing the 3D vertebral rotation between the supine position and the prone position lying on bolsters.

RESULTS

For sagittal analysis, the results showed a behavior in the evolution of rotation depending on the level. Between T01 and T10, the rotation was between - 14° and - 8°. Between T10 and L05, the sagittal rotation increased from - 10° up to + 10°. For frontal and transversal analysis, the rotations were under 6.5°.

CONCLUSION

These results could be valuable to perform a safe virtual templating: the information given by the virtual templating seems to be more accurate in the transversal plane than in the sagittal plane.

News in paediatric orthopaedic surgery: an overview of the latest advances in paediatric orthopaedics and traumatology (2020-2023)

PURPOSE

We propose to survey - even if arbitrarily - the publications in paediatric orthopaedics and traumatology that have had the greatest impact on the specialty during the period extending from the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in December 2020 and the end of all health restrictions in March 2023.

METHODS

Only studies with a high level of evidence or clinical relevance were selected. We briefly discussed the results and conclusions of these quality articles to situate them in relation to the existing literature and current practice.

RESULTS

Publications are presented by dividing traumatology and orthopaedics whose publications are further subdivided according to anatomical districts; articles concerning neuro-orthopaedics, tumours, and infections were presented separately while sports medicine is jointly presented with knee-related articles.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the difficulties encountered during the global COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2023), orthopaedic and trauma specialists, including paediatric orthopaedic surgeons, have maintained a high level of scientific output, in terms of quantity and quality of production.

Robotics Coupled With Navigation for Pediatric Spine Surgery: Initial Intraoperative Experience With 162 Cases

BACKGROUND

This study assesses intraoperative efficacy, accuracy, and complications of pedicle screw placement using robotic-assisted navigation (RAN) in pediatric spine surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent spine deformity surgery using RAN at a single pediatric institution from 2019 to 2021 was conducted. Patient demographics, perioperative metrics, screw execution and accuracy, technical difficulties, and other outcomes were summarized. In cases with postoperative computed tomography scans, screws were classified using the Gertzbein and Robbins classification scale. Fisher exact tests were used to assess the relationship between procedural changes and lateral screw malposition.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-two cases with an average patient age of 15.1 years (range, 4 to 31 y) were reviewed. The most common diagnosis was adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (n=80) with an average major curve of 65 degrees. Of 1467 screws attempted, 1461 were executed successfully (99.6%). All failures were in Type D pedicles and were lateral deviations recognized with routine intraoperative fluoroscopy. In cases with postoperative computed tomography imaging, 100% of screws (n=197) were placed with complete containment (Grade A). Remaining screws were graded as accurate by mirroring fluoroscopy and planned computer software positions. In 4% of cases, loss of registration was detected by a safety check before drilling at the planned level. There were no neurological deficits or returns to the operating room. Two changes occurred as part of the learning curve associated with this technique. (1) Adoption of a high-speed navigated drill: Change 1 (last 74 cases). (2) Drilling all pilot holes robotically first, then placing screws within the robotically established tracts to avoid motion and subsequent registration disruption: Change 2 (last 39 cases). Change 1 was less likely to result in screw malposition as no screws skived lateral with the technique ( P =0.03). Change 2 trended toward statistical significance for avoidance of screw malposition and loss of registration, as no loss of registration occurred after adopting this technique.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the safety and screw accuracy associated with the use of RAN in pediatric patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Intraoperative Navigation and Robotics in Pediatric Spinal Deformity

Current technologies for image guidance navigation and robotic assistance with spinal surgery are improving rapidly with several systems commercially available. Newer machine vision technology has several potential advantages. Limited studies have shown similar outcomes to traditional navigation platforms with decreased intraoperative radiation and time required for registration. However, there are no active robotic arms that can be coupled with machine vision navigation. Further research is necessary to justify the cost, potential increased operative time, and workflow issues but the use of navigation and robotics will only continue to expand given the growing body of evidence supporting their use.

Use of a high-speed drill in robotics coupled with navigation for pediatric spine surgery

With the increasing number of surgeries for pediatric spinal deformities, the aim has been to reduce the associated complications, such as those caused by screw malposition. This case series is an intra-operative experience with a new navigated high-speed revolution drill (Mazor Midas, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) for pediatric spinal deformity to assess accuracy and workflow. 88 patients, ranging from 2 to 29 years of age, were included who underwent posterior spinal fusion with the navigated high-speed drill. Diagnoses, Cobb angles, imaging, surgical time, complications, and total number of screws placed are described. Screw positioning was evaluated using fluoroscopy, plain radiography, and CT. Mean age was 15.4 years old. Diagnoses included 47 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, 15 neuromuscular scoliosis, 8 spondylolisthesis, 4 congenital scoliosis, and 14 other. The mean Cobb angulation for scoliosis patients was 64° and the mean number of levels fused was 10. 81 patients had registration via intraoperative 3-D imaging and 7 had pre-operative CT scan to fluoroscopy registration. There were a total of 1559 screws with 925 placed robotically. 927 drill paths were drilled with the Mazor Midas. 926 out of 927 drill paths were accurate. The mean surgical time was 304 min with the mean robotic time being 46 min. This is the first intra-operative report to our knowledge documenting the experience with the Mazor Midas drill in pediatric spinal deformity showing decreased skiving potential, decreased torque when drilling, and lastly increased accuracy. Level of evidence: level III.

Accuracy of computer-assisted pedicle screw placement for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison between robotics and navigation

PURPOSE

To compare the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) between robotics and navigation and clarify the factors that cause screw deviation when robotics is used.

METHODS

Fifty consecutive patients who underwent posterior spinal fusions with computer-assisted pedicle screw placement including robotics and navigation for AIS were included. A total of 741 pedicle screws (250: Robot group, 491: Navi group) were evaluated on postoperative CT images. A rate of penetration of ≥ 2 mm was calculated as the deviation rate. After propensity score matching, we examined vertebral levels, the distance from the reference frame (RF), and the pedicle channel grade as factors for deviation.

RESULTS

The deviation rate was significantly lower in the Robot group than in the Navi group (Robot group: 1.6%, Navi group: 7.5%). After propensity score matching, 22 cases were extracted. At T5-T8, the deviation rate of the Robot group was significantly lower than that of the Navi group. In the Robot group, the T2-T4 deviation rate was significantly higher than at the other vertebral levels. The distance from the RF didn't affect the deviation rate. The deviation rate of pedicle channel Grade 4 (inner diameter of less than 1 mm) was significantly higher than for the other grades.

CONCLUSION

The deviation rate of robotics was 1.6%, lower than that of navigation. The narrow pedicles with an inner diameter of less than 1 mm (deviation rate: 22.2%) and the upper thoracic level (deviation rate: 14.3%) were factors related to screw deviation even when using robotics.

Tips and pitfalls to improve accuracy and reduce radiation exposure in intraoperative CT navigation for pediatric scoliosis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

An increasing number of medical centers are adopting an intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) navigation system (iCT-Navi) to provide three-dimensional navigation for pediatric scoliosis surgery. While iCT-Navi has been reported to provide higher pedicle screw (PS) insertion accuracy, it may also result in higher radiation exposure to the patient. What innovations and studies have been introduced to reduce radiation exposure and further improve PS insertion?

PURPOSE

Evaluate the level of evidence and quality of papers while categorizing the tips and pitfalls regarding pediatric scoliosis surgery using iCT-Navi. Compare iCT-Navi with other methods, including preoperative CT navigation.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Articles on pediatric scoliosis surgery with iCT-Navi published through to June 2022.

OUTCOME MEASURES

PS perforation rate and patient intraoperative radiation dose.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and PubMed databases were searched for articles satisfying the criteria of iCT-Navi use and pediatric scoliosis surgery. The level of evidence and quality of the articles meeting the criteria were evaluated according to the guidelines of the North American Spine Society and American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, respectively. The articles were also categorized by theme and summarized in terms of PS insertion accuracy and intraoperative radiation dose. The origins and characteristics of five major classification methods of PS perforation grade were summarized as well.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 811 studies, of which 20 papers were included in this review. Overall, 513 pediatric scoliosis patients (381 idiopathic, 44 neuromuscular, 39 neurofibromatosis type 1, 28 congenital, 14 syndromic, seven other) were evaluated for PS perforations among 6,209 iCT-Navi insertions. We found that 232 (3.7%) screws were judged as major perforations (G2 or G3), 55 (0.9%) screws were judged as dangerous deviations (G3), and seven (0.1%) screws were removed. There were no reports of neurovascular injury caused by PSs. The risk factors for PS perforation included more than six vertebrae distance from the reference frame, more than nine consecutive insertions, upper thoracic level, thinner pedicle, upper instrumented vertebra proximity, short stature, and female. The accuracy of PS insertion did not remarkably decrease when the radiation dose was reduced to 1/5 or 1/10 by altering the iCT-Navi protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

iCT-Navi has the potential to reduce PS perforation rates compared with other methods. The use of low-dose radiation protocols may not significantly affect PS perforation rates. Although several risk factors for PS perforation and measures to reduce radiation dose have been reported, the current evidence is limited by a lack of consistency in classifying PS perforation and evaluating patient radiation dose among studies. The standardization of several outcome definitions is recommended in this rapidly developing field.

Paediatric Spinal Deformity Surgery: Complications and Their Management

Surgical correction of paediatric spinal deformity is associated with risks, adverse events, and complications that must be preoperatively discussed with patients and their families to inform treatment decisions, expectations, and long-term outcomes. The incidence of complications varies in relation to the underlying aetiology of spinal deformity and surgical procedure. Intraoperative complications include bleeding, neurological injury, and those related to positioning. Postoperative complications include persistent pain, surgical site infection, venous thromboembolism, pulmonary complications, superior mesenteric artery syndrome, and also pseudarthrosis and implant failure, proximal junctional kyphosis, crankshaft phenomenon, and adding-on deformity, which may necessitate revision surgery. Interventions included in enhanced recovery after surgery protocols may reduce the incidence of complications. Complications must be diagnosed, investigated and managed expeditiously to prevent further deterioration and to ensure optimal outcomes. This review summarises the complications associated with paediatric spinal deformity surgery and their management.

SAP Principle Guided Free Hand Technique: A Secret for T1 to S1 Pedicle Screw Placement

OBJECTIVE

Existing freehand techniques of screw placement mainly emphasized on various entry points and complex trajectory reference. The aim of this study is to illustrate a standardized and reliable freehand technique of pedicle screw insertion for open pedicle screw fixation with a universal entry point and a stereoscopic trajectory reference system and report the results from a single surgeon's clinical experience with the technique.

METHOD

In this study, the author respectively reviewed a total of 200 consecutive patients who had undergone open freehand pedicle screw fixation with Superior Articular Process (SAP) technique from January 2019 to May 2020. For accuracy and safety, all 200 cases had undergone postoperative X-ray while 33 cases including spinal deformity, infection, and tumor had received additional CT-scan. Screw accuracy was analyzed via a CT-based classification system with Student's t test.

RESULTS

A total of 1126 screws had been placed from T1-S1 with SAP-guided freehand technique and the majority had been confirmed safe in X-ray without the need of CT scan. A total of 316 screws in deformity or infectious or tumor cases had undergone additional CT scan with 95.5% (189 of 198 screws) accuracy in thoracic group and 94.9% (112 of 118 screws) in lumbar group. The accuracy had been 90.5% (114 of 126 screws) in deformity group and 95.8% (182 of 190 screws) in non-deformity group. All perforation cases had been rated Grade B (<2 mm) without significant difference between the medial and the lateral (p < 0.05). No cases had been detected with significant neurological deficiencies. The mean intraoperative X-ray shots were 0.73 per screw.

CONCLUSION

SAP-guidance is a reliable freehand technique for thoracic and lumbar pedicle screw instrument. It allows accurate and safe screw insertion in both non-deformity and deformity cases with less radiation exposure.

Preoperative MRI Reliably Predicts Pedicle Dimensions on Intraoperative CT Images in Structural Main Thoracic Curves in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective comparative study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the length and diameter of thoracic pedicles in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) as measured on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (pMRI) to intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) scan.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Optimally sized pedicle screw placement during instrumented posterior spinal fusion for AIS can maximize correction and minimize screw pullout. While iCT-guided navigation can quickly estimate screw position and size, this technology is not universally available. Many surgeons utilize pMRI, when obtained, to estimate screw sizes. Data comparing these measurements on pMRI and iCT is limited. We hypothesized that in patients with surgical magnitude AIS, pedicle length, and diameter measured on pMRI would have at least moderate reliability compared to those made on iCT images.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The pMRI and iCT for 60 patients with structural thoracic curves who underwent posterior spinal fusion for AIS at a single center between 2009 and 2017 were analyzed. Bilateral T5-T12 vertebral levels were evaluated for pedicle chord length and pedicle isthmic diameter on both pMRI and iCT. Between-study reliability and interrater reliability was evaluated for each level of the thoracic spine.

RESULTS

There is good reliability for pedicle length [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.8, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-0.83] and diameter (ICC=0.86, 95% CI: 0.84-0.88) between pMRI and iCT. When assessed by level, T6 has the lowest reliability for length (ICC=0.52, 95% CI: 0.33-0.67) and diameter (ICC=0.55, 95% CI: 0.35-0.69). Interrater reliability ranged from moderate-to-good reliability for all pedicle measurements for both length and diameter on pMRI and iCT.

CONCLUSION

Pedicle measurements made on pMRI may be used with reasonable reliability to predict pedicle dimensions visualized on iCT, allowing surgeons to preoperatively plan pedicle screw sizes based off magnetic resonance imaging.

Robotics is useful for less-experienced surgeons in spinal deformity surgery

PURPOSE

To verify whether robotics was useful for surgeons who had less experience with spinal deformity surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of 70 consecutive patients who underwent robotic-assisted pedicle screw placements with open procedures using a spine robotic system (Mazor X Stealth Edition) at a single institution from April 2021 to April 2022. Gertzbein-Robbins grades were used to assess the deviation of the 599 pedicle screws in the postoperative CT images. The rate of Grade A was considered the perfect accuracy rate, and the rate of Grades C, D, and E was calculated as the deviation rate. The perfect accuracy rate and deviation rate were compared between the spinal deformity and the non-deformity groups. The perfect accuracy rate, deviation rate, and screw insertion time were compared in the spinal deformity cases between the expert surgeon group and the less-experienced surgeon group.

RESULTS

The deviation rate of the spinal deformity group was higher than that of the non-deformity group even though there was no statistically significant difference (spinal deformity group: 2.3%, non-deformity group: 1.2%, p = 0.350). In the spinal deformity cases, there was no significant difference in the perfect accuracy rate between the expert surgeon group and the less-experienced surgeon group, but the deviation rate was significantly lower in the less-experienced surgeon group (expert surgeon group: 5.0%, less-experienced surgeon group: 0%, p = 0.008). The screw insertion time was significantly shorter in the less-experienced surgeon group.

CONCLUSION

Robotics is particularly useful for surgeons with less experience in spinal deformity surgery.