Systemic, pulmonary, and coronary hemodynamic effects of labetalol in hypertensive subjects

Clinical pharmacokinetics and kinetic-dynamic relationships of dilevalol and labetalol

Dilevalol and labetalol are examples of a growing number of new beta-blockers which combine nonselective beta-adrenoceptor antagonism with vasodilator activity. Dilevalol is one of the 4 stereoisomers of labetalol, and is estimated to form approximately 25% of the racemic drug. Labetalol itself is an alpha 1-antagonist but dilevalol, which has negligible affinity for alpha-receptors, exerts its vasodilator effect via beta 2-agonism. Both drugs are rapidly and completely absorbed in 60 to 90 min and subject to extensive first-pass hepatic metabolism; the average bioavailability after oral administration is around 20 to 35%, and there is wide interindividual variability in plasma drug concentrations and dosage requirements. The volume of distribution of dilevalol (17 to 25 L/kg) is higher than that reported for labetalol (3 to 16 L/kg), although both drugs are concentrated in the extravascular compartment. Correspondingly, the elimination half-life of dilevalol at steady-state is around 15h compared with 8h for labetalol. There is evidence that the pharmacokinetics of dilevalol change (a reduction in clearance) in translation from single-dose to long term therapy. There is no clinically significant effect of age on the steady-state disposition of either drug and the pharmacokinetics of labetalol appear to be unchanged during pregnancy. Although there is a linear relationship between dose and area under the concentration-time curve, early studies found no evidence of a simple relationship between dose or plasma drug concentration and the fall in blood pressure. However, an integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model has been used to correlate concentrations of both drugs with reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure in individuals. This approach derives a mathematical description of antihypertensive response which integrates pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic information and also takes account of placebo effects and changes in drug concentration and blood pressure during the dosage interval. The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of labetalol are characterised by a linear model. For example, in a group of healthy volunteers, the 'responsiveness' to labetalol was -0.19mm Hg/micrograms/L. In contrast, the relationships of dilevalol are best described by a Langmuir maximum effect model, and so individual responses to short and long term treatment have been quantified by the concentration-effect parameters of maximum effect and drug concentration required to produce 50% of this.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Labetalol. A reappraisal of its pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic use in hypertension and ischaemic heart disease

Since labetalol was first reviewed in the Journal (1978), its scope of therapeutic use has expanded and become better defined. Labetalol is an adrenoceptor blocking drug with combined alpha- and beta-blocking properties. These result in a more favourable haemodynamic profile for labetalol compared with 'pure' beta-blockers or pure alpha-blockers, but also contribute to a wider range, but not an overall increased incidence, of adverse effects. The drug is effective and well-tolerated in patients with all grades of hypertension, but is of particular value in special subgroups such as Black patients, the elderly and patients with renal hypertension. While comparative studies are not extensive, available data show that the drug reduces blood pressure to a similar extent, and in a similar proportion of patients, as 'pure' beta-blockers such as propranolol, pure alpha-blockers such as prazosin, calcium antagonists (nifedipine, verapamil), and centrally acting drugs (clonidine and methyldopa). Labetalol is very effective in hypertensive pregnant women and in hypertensive crises, where it provides good control of blood pressure without serious adverse effects, and where few therapeutic options exist. Few controlled studies have investigated the use of labetalol in deliberate induction of hypotension or prevention of hypertension during anaesthesia, and also in patients with ischaemic heart disease. However, available evidence suggests a role for labetalol in these indications and further studies should aid in clarification of its efficacy in these areas. Thus, with its broad scope of therapeutic use in hypertension labetalol remains an important therapeutic option, and the drug may well find an additional place in the treatment of myocardial ischaemia if further evidence confirms encouraging preliminary findings.

Labetalol in normotensive patients with angina pectoris

Labetalol, an alpha-beta-blocker, has been shown to have vasodilating as well as beta-blocking properties. From the theoretical point of view such a drug is likely to be beneficial in the treatment of angina pectoris. There are very few studies investigating the effects of labetalol in normotensive patients with angina pectoris. The three major controlled trials that have been published show that labetalol reduces angina frequency and prolongs exercise duration. In one study the effects of labetalol in anginal subjects using ambulatory monitoring was performed and showed a reduction in silent ischemia as well as a reduction in angina pectoris. Thus labetalol would appear to be an effective antianginal agent. Further studies are necessary to determine if the anti-anginal effect is entirely due to the beta-receptor-blocking activity of the drug or whether labetalol's vasodilating property has important additional benefit.

Systemic and coronary hemodynamics of labetalol in normotensive patients with ischemic heart disease

The systemic and coronary hemodynamic effects of combined alpha- and beta-adrenergic blockade produced by labetalol were assessed in 24 normotensive patients with angina pectoris and an ischemic electrocardiographic response to exercise stress. Both the intravenous (0.5 mg/kg) and oral (200 mg) formulations of labetalol were evaluated. At rest, labetalol produced systemic vasodilation (systemic vascular resistance -16% after intravenous and -8% after oral labetalol, both p less than 0.05) without change in heart rate. Aortic pressure usually was lower and cardiac output preserved or increased. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure was unchanged. Coronary sinus flow was usually unchanged after either route of administration. Exercise duration was prolonged in 14 of the 20 patients with severe coronary artery disease. During exercise, tachycardia was blunted (-12% after intravenous, -7% after oral labetalol, both p less than 0.05) as was the increase in mean aortic pressure (-12% and -13% intravenous and oral labetalol respectively, both p less than 0.05), left ventricular end-diastolic pressure [-7% and -1%, respectively, both p = not significant (NS)] was unchanged. Coronary sinus flow (-16% and -25%, respectively, both p less than 0.05) was decreased as heart rate and aortic pressure were lower. Cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance, and coronary vascular resistance were similar to control exercise. The hemodynamic effects of intravenous and oral labetalol are, in general, similar. Hemodynamic responses differ from those produced by other beta-blockers and by calcium antagonists.

Systemic and coronary hemodynamic effects of combined alpha- and beta-adrenergic blockade (labetalol) in normotensive patients with stable angina pectoris and positive exercise stress test responses

The systemic and coronary hemodynamic effects of combined alpha- and beta-adrenergic blockade produced by labetalol were assessed in 12 normotensive patients with angina pectoris and an ischemic electrocardiographic response to exercise stress. When given to the patient at rest, labetalol (0.5 mg/kg intravenously) produced systemic and coronary vasodilation (mean 16% and 13%, respectively, both p less than 0.05); aortic pressure decreased, cardiac output increased and coronary flow and heart rate did not change. Before labetalol treatment, supine bicycle exercise produced angina in all patients. After treatment, exercise duration was prolonged in 8 patients (average 33%). At the same duration of exercise that led to angina during the control period, ST depression in lead V5 was less after labetalol (from 1.2 to 0.4 mm, p less than 0.5). During exercise, tachycardia was blunted (-12%, p less than 0.05) as were the increases in aortic pressure (-12%, p less than 0.05), left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (-7%, difference not significant) and coronary sinus flow (-16%, p less than 0.05). Cardiac output and systemic and coronary vascular resistance were similar to values during control exercise. The hemodynamic effects of labetalol appeared to be beneficial and differed from those of classic beta-adrenergic blocking agents.

Effects of combined alpha and beta adrenoceptor blockade in patients with angina pectoris. A double blind study comparing labetalol with placebo

The effects of a combined alpha and beta receptor antagonist, labetalol, were investigated in 10 patients with chronic stable angina pectoris. The optimal dose was determined during an initial dose titration study when the patients were treated with 200 mg, 400 mg, and 600 mg (six patients) of labetalol a day. The effective dose was then compared with placebo in a double blind randomised study. The effects of the drug were monitored with angina diaries, treadmill exercise testing, and 48 hour ambulatory electrocardiographic ST segment monitoring. Plasma labetalol concentrations were measured during each treatment period. The mean effective antianginal dose of labetalol was 480 (SD 140) mg/day given by mouth twice a day. There was a dose related reduction in daytime and nocturnal heart rate, the frequency of pain was significantly reduced by 41%, and exercise duration was significantly increased by 44% with labetalol when compared with placebo. The frequency and duration of the episodes of ST segment depression were significantly reduced by 56% and 73% respectively with labetalol. Adverse effects resulted in a reduction of the dose of labetalol in two patients. Thus labetalol is an effective agent in the treatment of angina pectoris.

Pharmacology of combined alpha-beta-blockade. II. Haemodynamic effects of labetalol

The cardinal haemodynamic disturbance in established hypertension is an increased total peripheral resistance and a subnormal blood flow, particularly during exercise. The spontaneously occurring changes in central haemodynamics have been followed in young males with essential hypertension over a 17-year period: a gradual increase in total peripheral resistance and blood pressure, and a gradual fall in cardiac output and stroke volume, have been demonstrated. Labetalol is a unique antihypertensive agent which induces both alpha- and beta-blockade. Numerous studies have shown that when labetalol is given intravenously to patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, blood pressure falls within a few minutes-partly due to reduction in cardiac output and heart rate and partly due to reduction in total peripheral resistance. In most series the average reduction in blood pressure was 17 to 22%, the reduction in total peripheral resistance 11 to 14%, and the reduction in cardiac output 2 to 10%. Thus, the reduction in cardiac output with labetalol is less than that seen after single-dose injection of beta-blockers without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. After intravenous injection, the blood pressure-lowering effect is most marked in the upright position and during muscular exercise when cardiac output is usually significantly reduced. Labetalol reduces blood pressure in severe hypertension. Intravenous doses of 0.2 to 0.8 mg/kg bodyweight reduce blood pressure by approximately 20%. This hypotensive effect is partly due to a reduction in total peripheral resistance and partly due to a fall in cardiac index. When the reduction in blood pressure is gradual and moderate (less than 20%), it is mainly produced by a reduction in total peripheral resistance. During long term use labetalol induces haemodynamic changes rather similar to those seen after bolus injection. However, during prolonged use there is a tendency to normalisation in cardiac output and stroke volume; the sustained decrease in blood pressure is mainly due to a reduction in total peripheral resistance. In a recent 6-year follow-up study where 15 patients were studied before treatment and after 1 and 6 years on long term labetalol treatment, a tendency to normalisation of central haemodynamics was found. Over the years total peripheral resistance was gradually reduced by 15 to 20% at rest as well as during exercise. Stroke volume gradually increased and after 6 years of treatment was approximately 10% higher than the pretreatment value. This compensated for the reduced heart rate and no significant reduction in cardiac output was seen either during exercise or at rest.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)