Serum LH-RH and LH patterns in men after pulsatile administration of LH-RH. comparison of different doses and routes of administration

Induction of spermatogenesis and fertility in hypogonadotropic azoospermic men by intravenous pulsatile gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) has only recently become a helpful tool in the medication of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH). Two azoospermic patients with HH who had previously been treated with hCG/hMG because of delayed puberty and each of whom had fathered a child after previous gonadotropin therapy were referred due to secondary failure of hCG/hMG treatment to induce spermatogenesis and fertility. A pulse study where blood was drawn every 15 minutes for LH, FSH and PRL RIAs was performed in each patient, and afterwards a bolus of i.v. GnRH was injected to assess gonadotropin responsiveness. A portable GnRH pump was connected to each patient so that it administered 5-20 micrograms of GnRH i.v. every 89 minutes. Spermatogenesis was first detected after 42 and 78 days respectively in the 2 treated HH men and 4 1/2 months from the start of treatment their wives became pregnant. No thrombophlebitis or other complications of the i.v. therapy occurred. In the case of the first patient, the semen was washed and concentrated and intra-uterine inseminations were carried out in an attempt to shorten the time needed to achieve fertility. The first pregnancy was successfully terminated at 38 weeks with the delivery of 2 heterozygotic normal male babies. The second pregnancy ended in spontaneous delivery of a healthy female. We conclude that i.v. pulsatile, intermittent GnRH administration is a safe, efficient and highly successful means of treating azoospermic men with HH.

Serum luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) and gonadotropic hormones in men after a bolus dose of LH-RH: comparison of different doses and routes of administration

Serum levels of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH), LH, and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) were measured for 60 minutes after 5- and 20-micrograms bolus doses of LH-RH given either intravenously or subcutaneously to 20 healthy men, for the study of LH-RH pharmacokinetics and the corresponding pituitary gonadotropin release. Intravenous (5- and 20-micrograms) LH-RH administration revealed much sharper LH-RH pulses, with significantly higher levels between 1 and 5 minutes (P less than 0.001) but lower levels between 30 and 60 minutes (P less than 0.05), compared with the subcutaneous route. No statistically significant differences were observed in the magnitude and time occurrence of maximum LH release or in the area under the LH response curves between intravenous and subcutaneous LH-RH administration, either in the 5-micrograms or in the 20-micrograms group. FSH responses were small and insignificant in all the performed tests. The intravenous route of administration seems preferential in therapeutic regimens that use pulsatile exogenous LH-RH, because the conditions of intermittent pituitary stimulation are more adequately fulfilled and the risk of dose accumulation is reduced. Furthermore, LH-RH doses of 5 micrograms are capable of producing adequate pituitary LH release, whereas increases in the pulse dose up to 20 micrograms seem to have no additional effects.