Survey of clinical behavior of patients with borderline epithelial tumors of the ovary

Necrotized torsion of enormous bilateral borderline tumors in young patient

Borderline ovarian tumors, or tumors of low malignant potential, are neoplasms of good prognosis that affect mostly patients of reproductive age. They account for 15% of all epithelial ovarian neoplasms and they are managed with surgical cytoreduction. Conservative surgery may be considered in patients who desire fertility preservation. Here we report on a patient who presented with vague abdominal symptoms and was diagnosed with large bilateral borderline tumors, of 18 and 15 cm in size. She underwent a total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and epiplectomy and received adjuvant chemotherapy. Borderline ovarian tumors are a pathologic entity the gynaecologist should be well acquainted with.

Twenty-five-year-old Woman with Bilateral Borderline Ovarian Tumour Desiring to Preserve Fertility - Case Report and Literature Review on the Current State of Fertility Preservation in Women with Borderline Ovarian Tumours

Borderline ovarian tumours are semimalignant tumours occurring unilaterally or bilaterally with a peak incidence among women of reproductive age. Since the affected women often wish to preserve fertility, particular precautions must be taken when counselling the patient and obtaining consent prior to planning an individual treatment. Options for preserving fertility include an organ-sparing surgical procedure and cryopreservation of oocytes and/or ovarian tissue. In this article, we report on a 25-year-old patient with a bilateral seromucinous borderline tumour who desired all fertility-preserving options. In order to perform the procedure without delay, we opted to perform luteal phase stimulation prior to oocyte retrieval. We conclude by discussing the current literature on the state of fertility preservation in the treatment of borderline ovarian tumours.

Low-grade serous ovarian cancer: A review

Epithelial ovarian cancers can be divided into the more common, aggressive type II cancers and the less common, slow-growing type I cancers. Under this model, serous ovarian carcinomas can be subdivided into high-grade (type II) and low-grade (type I) tumours. The two-tier system for grading serous ovarian carcinomas is superior to more detailed grading systems in terms of predicting survival. Low-grade serous carcinomas typically present in young women and have a relatively good prognosis, despite being resistant to chemotherapy. Low-grade serous cancers have a high prevalence of KRAS and BRAF mutations, but a low prevalence of TP53 mutations (which are characteristic of high-grade serous cancers). Among women with low-grade serous ovarian cancer, the presence of a KRAS/BRAF mutation is a favorable prognostic factor. Studies of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) inhibitor in low-grade serous ovarian cancer suggest that identifying MAPK mutations might eventually be useful in guiding treatment.

Atypical proliferative endometrioid tumor of ovary: Report of a rare case

Borderline ovarian tumors represent 10-20% of epithelial ovarian neoplasms that typically have an excellent prognosis. Both the oncological behavior of this group of tumors and also the diagnostic histological criteria are intermediate between the specific criteria of benign and malignant. They usually occur in the third to fourth decade of women's lives and are limited to the ovary in 80% of cases. Atypical proliferative or borderline ovarian tumors constitute a group of epithelial tumors with an excellent prognosis due to the low aggressiveness, microscopic examination is mandatory in order to establish an accurate histological diagnosis in all cases of borderline ovarian tumors and to differentiate from well differentiated adenocarcinoma. We report a case of a 45 year old female who presented with irregular bleeding per vaginum and underwent hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Atypical proliferative endometrioid tumor of the left ovary was an incidental finding, which is a very rare occurrence.

Special issues in fertility preservation for gynecologic malignancies

Gynecologic malignancies account for 1,09 million new cancer cases worldwide consisting of about 12% of tumors affecting female population. About 10% of all female cancer survivors are younger than 40 years of age. Since cancers affecting female genital organs are usually treated by radical surgery, chemotherapy or chemoradiation approaches that induce permanent damage of reproductive functions, the development of strategies for fertility preservation represent one of the most important goals for gynecologic oncology. In this scenario, the newly defined oncofertility discipline acquires increasing interest, offering patients maximal chances to make an adequate decision about future fertility, based on their oncologic diagnosis and prognosis. However, the majority of physicians do not pay particular attention to these issues, even if impressive progresses have been made in this field in the last decades. Possibly, it is due to the lack of strong evidences from clinical trials without an adequate number of cases to establish safety and efficacy of these procedures. In this review we will discuss the most recently debated options for fertility preservation in gynecologic oncology, highlighting issues and controversies related to oncofertility.

Borderline tumours of the ovary, current controversies regarding their diagnosis and treatment

Borderline ovarian tumours generally affect women of reproductive age. The positive prognosis is related to the fact that over 80% of cases are diagnosed at an early stage of the disease. Although radical surgery is the standard of care for this disease, fertility-sparing surgery can be performed in selected cases. Since it was first described in 1929, the knowledge of the molecular and histologic characteristics has been significantly improved. In this review, advances in the clinical behaviour, pathologic characteristics, prognostics factors, and different strategies of treatment are discussed.

Borderline ovarian tumors and extended patient follow-up: an individual institution's experience

INTRODUCTION

Borderline tumors of the ovary (BOT) comprise nearly 20% of all ovarian malignancies and are associated with a favorable prognosis. However, since these lesions can present with malignant features and recur, a further evaluation of appropriate patient management and long-term follow-up is warranted.

METHODS

We report a physician group's retrospective experience treating BOT patients at a single institution. Patient demographics, disease pathology, treatment type (surgery, chemotherapy), and patient surveillance (e.g., disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival, follow-up via CA-125/radiology/physical exam) data were reviewed in all cases.

RESULTS

In the present study, 78 BOT patients treated from April 2001 until February 2009 were identified and confirmed via pathologic diagnosis. The majority (87%) underwent surgery, although nearly 13% of patients also received adjuvant chemotherapy. In the study population, 12% of the patients developed progressive disease, which was primarily detected via CA-125 and physical exam/disease symptomatology. DFS for these patients was 38 months. Recurrent disease was significantly related to the administration of chemotherapy (P = 0.0024) and prolonged time since initial treatment (P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Since BOT can be aggressive and eventually recur, continued (i.e., long-term) surveillance with CA-125 evaluation and physical examination should be considered for optimal patient follow-up.

Pregnancy rates after conservative treatment for borderline ovarian tumours: a systematic review

Borderline ovarian tumours account for 10-15% of all ovarian cancers, and there have been numerous studies indicating their excellent long-term prognosis. As this disease commonly affects younger women, the issue of fertility-preserving surgery is increasingly important. A systematic review of the literature, searching the relevant electronic databases was performed analysing conservative surgery, borderline ovarian tumours and pregnancy rates/fertility outcome. Overall, 19 studies met the inclusion criteria. From these studies, 2479 patients had borderline ovarian tumours of which 923 (37%) patients were treated by conservative surgery. Nine studies recorded data regarding pregnancy outcome. A pregnancy rate of 48% was calculated on these data, where recorded, analysing the number of women wanting to conceive and the actual number of pregnancies achieved. The recurrence rate after conservative treatment was 16% with only five recorded disease-related deaths. Knowledge of the pregnancy rates is important to permit appropriate counselling of women diagnosed with this malignancy.

Comparison of the clinical behavior of newly diagnosed stages II–IV low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary with that of serous ovarian tumors of low malignant potential that recur as low-grade serous carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Serous ovarian tumors of low malignant potential (STLMP) frequently coexist with low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary (LGSC) and, when they recur, frequently do so as LGSC. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients with these two tumor types.

METHODS

All patients with stages II-IV LGSC (group 1) or with STLMP that recurred as LGSC (group 2) seen at our institution from 1973 to 2003 were identified, and demographic data were obtained. For group 1, progression-free and overall survival times were calculated from the date of primary diagnosis to the date of disease progression/recurrence or the date of last contact/death, respectively. For group 2, progression-free and overall survival times were calculated from the date of first relapse as a LGSC to the date of progression or the date of last contact/death, respectively. The method of Kaplan and Meier was used to estimate survival, and the log-rank test was used to compare differences between survival curves.

RESULTS

We identified 112 patients in group 1 and 41 in group 2. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in median age (42.7 vs. 45.4 years [at relapse]; P=0.37), progression-free survival time (19.5 vs. 25 months; P=0.92), or overall survival time (81.8 vs. 82.8 months; P=0.84).

CONCLUSIONS

The age at diagnosis, progression-free survival time, and overall survival time associated with newly diagnosed stages II-IV LGSC of the ovary are similar to those of STLMP that recur as LGSC, providing further evidence of an association between these two tumor types.

Clinical outcome of cystectomy compared with unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy as fertility-sparing treatment of borderline ovarian tumors

OBJECTIVE

To compare recurrence rates and fertility outcomes of patients with borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) who underwent unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with those of patients who underwent cystectomy only.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Gynecologic oncology department of a tertiary center.

PATIENT(S)

Sixty-two patients with BOTs who underwent fertility-preserving surgery.

INTERVENTION(S)

Unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (USO, n = 40) or cystectomy only (n = 22).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Tumor recurrence rate, incidence of pregnancy.

RESULT(S)

All 62 patients were alive with no clinical evidence of disease after a mean follow-up of 88 months. There was no statistically significant difference in mean tumor recurrence rates between patients who had undergone cystectomy only and those who had undergone USO (22.7% and 27.5%, respectively). In the cystectomy-treated group, the disease-free interval was shortened (23.6 compared with 41 mo), but the difference was not significant. However, the mean follow-up period for the cystectomy group was significantly shorter than for the USO group. Of the 62 patients, 25 (40.3%) attained 38 pregnancies, resulting in 35 deliveries.

CONCLUSION(S)

Our results support previous findings that conservative surgery is an acceptable option for women with BOTs who wish to preserve fertility. Cystectomy, like oophorectomy, appears to be an adequate treatment, provided that the patient is willing to undergo careful and prolonged follow-up.

Metastasis to sigmoid colon mucosa and submucosa from serous borderline ovarian tumor: response to hormone therapy

Distant metastasis to sites other than lymph nodes of borderline ovarian tumor is rare. We describe a case metastasized to sigmoid colon mucosa and submucosa. The metastatic lesion was detected incidentally by screening colonoscopy 7 years after the patient was treated for the primary tumor. The metastatic lesion responded well to treatment with oral Arimidex 1 mg/day. A follow-up colonoscopy with biopsy and imaging studies after 3 months of treatment revealed no evidence of disease in the sigmoid colon. This case showed that the sigmoid colon mucosa and submucosa should be considered as one of distant metastatic sites of a serous borderline ovarian tumor and the favorable response to Arimidex provides support the use of hormone therapy in women with serous borderline ovarian tumor.

Long-term outcomes following conservative surgery for borderline tumor of the ovary: a large population-based study

OBJECTIVES

To examine outcomes in women treated with conservative surgery for borderline ovarian tumor in a large population-based cohort with long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Women treated by conservative surgery for borderline tumor of the ovary from 1982-2004 within a large HMO setting were identified using electronic and tumor registry data. Chart review was performed when electronic data were incomplete. The indications for and outcomes from any subsequent gynecologic surgery and the risk of recurrent ovarian borderline and malignant tumor were determined. Risk factors for recurrence were analyzed using multivariate regression.

RESULTS

Among one hundred and ninety-three patients identified, the average age was 33 (12-95), with 97% having apparent Stage I disease. Patients were followed with remaining ovarian tissue in situ for a mean of 6.9 years, with 59 women having 10 or more years of such observation. There were 21 recurrences with borderline tumor (11%) with a median time to first recurrence of 4.7 years; women treated by cystectomy recurred three times more often compared to women treated by oophorectomy (23% versus 7%). Two patients (1%) recurred with malignant disease involving remaining ovarian tissue, both within the first 3 years after surgery, with one death due to recurrence. During long-term follow-up, 19% of patients eventually underwent complete removal of ovarian tissue: in 8%, the surgery was prophylactic, in 5%, surgery was done for benign pathology, and in 6% for recurrent disease.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population-based HMO setting, 11% of women treated with conservative surgery for borderline tumor recurred; however, half of these recurrences were successfully managed by repeat conservative surgery, with only 6% of women overall needing eventual complete removal of ovaries for recurrent disease. Patients treated by cystectomy were three times more likely to recur than those treated by oophorectomy. Malignant recurrences were rare, and while borderline recurrences often occurred more than 3 years after initial surgery, late malignant recurrences were not observed. These favorable long-term outcomes provide support for conservative surgery for these women.

Conservative surgery for borderline ovarian tumors: a review

OBJECTIVE

Borderline tumor of the ovary is an epithelial tumor with a low rate of growth and a low potential to invade or metastasize. This review will outline the most recent information regarding the molecular pathogenesis, pathology, fertility and tumor recurrence rate after conservative management of young women with early-stage borderline ovarian tumors.

METHODS

We performed a MEDLINE literature search of relevant clinical trials for the scope of this review that evaluated conservative treatment of borderline ovarian tumors for young women with low-stage disease who wish to preserve their fertility.

RESULTS

Recently, investigators have begun to identify subsets of patients with a worse prognosis, such as patients with aneuploid tumors. A number of oncogenes are under investigation to determine their role in the pathogenesis of borderline ovarian tumors. Previous studies have suggested the safety of conservative surgery with unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy or cystectomy for patients with stage I borderline ovarian tumors. Laparoscopic treatment of adnexal masses has proved to be a safe and effective diagnostic and therapeutic tool in the hands of experienced laparoscopists. For women who are treated conservatively, follow-up is important. Surgery remains the most effective therapy for later stage lesions. Adjuvant therapy for advanced stage of borderline ovarian tumors remains controversial.

CONCLUSION

Conservative management of borderline ovarian tumors is an appropriate therapeutic option for young women with early-stage lesions who wish to preserve their childbearing potential. Available data indicate that in these patients fertility, pregnancy outcome and survival remain excellent.

Serous and mucinous borderline (low malignant potential) tumors of the ovary

The prognosis for stage I serous borderline ovarian tumors (SBOTs) is thought to be excellent, despite rare, late recurrences. The behavior of advanced-stage SBOTs primarily depends on the invasiveness vs noninvasiveness of associated extraovarian implants. Pelvic and abdominal lymph node involvement and foci of microinvasion do not seem to adversely affect prognosis. Serous tumors with a micropapillary and/or cribriform growth pattern seem to be more frequently bilateral and exophytic and manifest at an advanced stage with a higher incidence of invasive implants than typical SBOTs. Molecular data suggest that such tumors may represent an intermediate stage in the typical SBOT-invasive low-grade serous carcinoma progression. Limited experience with endocervical (müllerian)-type mucinous borderline tumors shows a possible relation to SBOTs in clinicopathologic features and biologic behavior Intestinal-type mucinous borderline ovarian tumors (I-MBOTs) and well-differentiated mucinous carcinomas manifest at stage I in most cases; the prognosis is excellent. Mucinous tumors associated with pseudomyxoma peritonei are almost always secondary to similar tumors of the appendix or other gastrointestinal sites and should not be diagnosed as high-stage I-MBOTs. Rare primary ovarian mucinous tumors associated with pseudomyxoma peritonei are those arising in mature cystic teratomas. Advanced-stage ovarian mucinous carcinomas typically show frank, infiltrative-type invasion; the prognosis is poor.

Ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential (borderline tumors): outcome-based study of 276 patients with long-term (> or =5-year) follow-up

The natural history, classification, and nomenclature of ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential (S-LMP) (serous tumors of borderline malignancy, atypical proliferating tumors) are controversial. To determine long-term outcome for patients with S-LMP and further evaluate whether S-LMP can be stratified into clinically benign and malignant groups, the clinicopathologic features of 276 patients with S-LMP and > or =5 year follow-up were studied. The histology of the ovarian primary, extraovarian implants, and recurrent tumor(s) were characterized using World Health Organization criteria and correlated with FIGO stage and clinical follow-up. After censoring nontumor deaths, overall survival and disease-free survival for the 276 patients was 95% (98% FIGO stage I; 91% FIGO II-IV) and 78% (87% FIGO stage I; 65% FIGO stage II-IV), respectively. Unresectable disease (P < 0.001) and invasive implants (P < 0.001) were associated with decreased survival. When compared with typical S-LMP, S-LMP with micropapillary features were more strongly associated with invasive implants (P < 0.008) and decreased overall survival (P = 0.004), but patient outcome with micropapillary S-LMP was not independent of implant type. Stromal microinvasion in the primary tumor was also correlated with adverse outcome, independent of stage of disease, micropapillary architecture, and implant type (P = 0.03). There was no association between outcome and lymph node status. Transformation to low-grade serous carcinoma occurred in 6.8% of patients at intervals of 7 to 288 months (58% > or = 60 months) and was strongly associated with increased tempo of disease and decreased survival (P < 0.001). S-LMP forms a heterogeneous group, morphologically and clinically distinct from benign serous tumors and serous carcinoma. The majority of S-LMP are clinically benign, but recurrences are not uncommon, and persistent disease as well as deaths occur. Progression to low-grade serous carcinoma is highly predictive of more aggressive disease. Other features associated with recurrent and/or progressive disease include FIGO stage, invasive implants, microinvasion in the primary tumor, and micropapillary architecture. These predictors tend to co-occur, and no single clinical or pathologic feature or combination of features identify all adverse outcomes. The small, but significant risk of progression over time to low-grade serous carcinoma emphasizes the need for prolonged follow-up in patients with S-LMP.

Borderline epithelial tumors of the ovary

The concept and terminology of borderline epithelial tumors of the ovary have been controversial for over a century, in spite of the acceptance of a borderline category in almost all current classifications of ovarian tumors. Typically, borderline tumors are noninvasive neoplasms that have nuclear abnormalities and mitotic activity intermediate between benign and malignant tumors of similar cell type. Borderline tumors of all surface epithelial cell types have been studied. The most common and best understood are serous borderline tumors and mucinous borderline tumors of intestinal type, which are the subject of this review. Some of the most challenging issues for serous tumors include: the criteria and clinical behavior of stromal microinvasion; the high prevalence of synchronous extraovarian disease; the classification and histopathologic features of associated peritoneal tumor implants, especially invasive implants; and, the prognostic significance of micropapillary tumors. The mucinous borderline tumors of intestinal type have a different set of considerations, including: their frequently heterogeneous composition with coexisting benign, borderline and malignant elements; the classification and significance of accompanying noninvasive carcinoma; the recognition of stromal invasion, including microinvasion and expansile invasion; and, the historically misunderstood relationship to pseudomyxoma peritonei. All of these issues are discussed in this presentation, as are the important gross and microscopic features of serous and mucinous borderline tumors and pertinent information on their treatment and prognosis.

Mucinous borderline ovarian tumors: Points of general agreement and persistent controversies regarding nomenclature, diagnostic criteria, and behavior

This report focuses on the borderline category of ovarian mucinous tumors and summarizes the points of general agreement and persistent controversies identified by experts in the field who participated in the Borderline Ovarian Tumor Workshop held in Bethesda, MD, in August 2003. Points of agreement and persistent controversies regarding nomenclature, diagnostic criteria, and behavior are addressed for the following ovarian mucinous tumor categories: mucinous borderline ovarian tumor (M-BOT; synonymously referred to as atypical proliferative mucinous tumor of ovary or mucinous ovarian tumor of low malignant potential), M-BOT with intraepithelial carcinoma, and M-BOT with microinvasion. The morphologic spectrum of M-BOTs with regard to distinction from mucinous cystadenoma and the confluent glandular/expansile type of invasive mucinous carcinoma is also addressed. Non-ovarian mucinous tumors, including the secondary ovarian mucinous tumors associated with pseudomyxoma peritonei and metastatic mucinous carcinomas with a deceptive pattern of invasion, are recognized as tumors that can simulate primary M-BOTs. Improved classification of these mucinous tumors has clarifed the behavior of true M-BOTs by excluding these simulators from the M-BOT category.

Borderline ovarian tumours: a review of the recent literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Borderline tumors of the ovary are seen commonly in obstetrics and gynecology practices. This review will outline the most recent information regarding the epidemiology, molecular pathogenesis, pathology, and clinical management of these tumors.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the past, borderline ovarian tumors and invasive ovarian cancer were studied together, under the presumption that they represent a continuum of disease. This view is coming into question based on both epidemiological and molecular biological studies. Pathologists are increasingly able to identify poor prognostic histological features. This has not yet been translated into improved non-surgical therapy. Surgical management to excise all visible tumor remains the cornerstone of therapy. Because borderline ovarian tumors often occur in reproductive-age women, fertility is an important issue. Conservative surgery is safe in carefully selected patients.

SUMMARY

Our growing understanding of the relatively benign natural history of borderline ovarian tumors has allowed us to be more conservative in their surgical management, preserving fertility in many young women. A few women will be affected by a more virulent form of the disease with the potential to recur and cause death. The pathological features that identify patients with a poor prognosis are progressively being elucidated. Surgery remains the most effective therapy for these patients. Effective non-surgical therapies have yet to be identified. Hopefully, as molecular biological studies continue to expand our understanding of this disease as probably a separate carcinogenic process from invasive ovarian cancer, we will be able to employ this knowledge to design novel adjuvant therapies.

Recurrent micropapillary serous ovarian carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The objectives of the current study were to: 1) characterize the clinical outcome of patients with recurrent micropapillary serous ovarian carcinoma (MPSC) and 2) evaluate the survival impact of secondary cytoreductive surgery and other prognostic variables.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients with recurrent MPSC were identified retrospectively from hospital and tumor registry databases. Survival curves were generated from the time of tumor recurrence using the Kaplan-Meier method and statistical comparisons were performed using the log-rank test, logistic regression analysis, and the Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients at the time of recurrence was 46 years. The mean progression-free interval was 31.6 months, and 92% of patients had advanced stage disease at the time of the initial diagnosis. Twenty-one patients underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery; tumor debulking was performed in 90.5% of cases and 52.4% of patients required an intestinal resection. Optimal resection (residual disease < or = 1 cm) was achieved in 15 patients (71.4%). Patients undergoing optimal secondary cytoreduction had a median survival time of 61.2 months from the date of disease recurrence, compared with 25.5 months for those patients in whom suboptimal residual disease remained (P < 0.02) and 29.9 months for nonsurgical patients (P < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, optimal secondary cytoreduction was found to be the only independent predictor of survival. Salvage chemotherapy produced an objective response in 25% of patients with measurable disease. The administration of chemotherapy prior to surgical intervention was associated with a trend toward worse survival and a lower likelihood of optimal secondary cytoreduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimal secondary cytoreductive surgery is feasible in the majority of patients with recurrent MPSC and is an independent predictor of subsequent survival. Surgical intervention should be considered for those patients with recurrent MPSC. [See editorials on pages 675-6 and 677-80, this issue.]

Clinical management potential tumours of low malignancy

Approximately 3000 American women are diagnosed with borderline ovarian tumours annually. Common signs and symptoms include abdominal/pelvic pain and a palpable adnexal mass. Pelvic sonography may be helpful, although not specific, in the diagnosis. Serum CA 125 is abnormal in only about 50% of patients. Primary surgery is the principal treatment; it consists of resection of the primary tumour(s) (frequently in the form of fertility-sparing surgery), frozen-section analysis and consideration of comprehensive surgical staging. The role of surgical staging remains unclear; further research is necessary. For patients with stage I disease, surgery alone is the standard. For patients with stage II-IV disease (with non-invasive or invasive peritoneal implants), the role of post-operative therapy remains unclear. Approximately 20-30% of the latter will relapse, frequently after several years. Most so-called recurrences are low-grade carcinomas. Potential predictive or prognostic factors include age, FIGO stage, residual disease and the micropapillary pattern. After fertility-sparing surgery, most patients retain normal reproductive function.

Risk factors for epithelial borderline ovarian tumors: results of a Swedish case-control study

OBJECTIVE

Borderline ovarian tumors have a favorable prognosis. Previous epidemiological studies indicate common risk factors for invasive epithelial ovarian cancers and borderline tumors, but it remains unresolved whether these tumors are precursors of invasive cancers or a separate disease entity. The objective of this population-based case-control study conducted in 1993-1995 was to examine reproductive and other factors in relation to the risk of borderline ovarian tumors.

METHODS

Subjects were 193 histologically verified incident epithelial borderline tumor cases and 3899 randomly selected controls aged 50-74 years, whose data were collected through mailed questionnaires. Risk estimates were calculated by unconditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

Ever parous women were at reduced risk, with odds ratios of 0.44 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26-0.75) for serous and 0.63 (95% CI 0.34-1.19) for mucinous tumors. No clear trends emerged for age at first birth, at menarche, and at menopause. Lactation reduced tumor risk. Oral contraceptive ever use conferred no protection, with odds ratios of 1.40 (95% CI 0.87-2.26) for serous and 1.04 (95% CI 0.61-1.79) for mucinous tumors. The odds ratio for serous tumors following unopposed estrogen ever use was 2.07 (95% CI 1.08-3.95), whereas no risk increase appeared with estrogens supplemented by cyclic or continuous progestins. Mucinous tumors were not associated with hormone replacement therapy. The odds ratio for serous tumors in the highest category of body mass index was 6.47 (95% CI 3.09-13.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing parity and lactation reduce the risk of borderline ovarian tumors in women aged 50-74, while no protection follows oral contraceptive use. Hormonal situations such as unopposed estrogen use and obesity, where estrogens are not counteracted by progestins, may increase the risk of serous tumors.

Molecular evidence for the independent origin of extra-ovarian papillary serous tumors of low malignant potential

BACKGROUND

Molecular data suggest that peritoneal tumors in women with advanced-stage ovarian papillary serous adenocarcinoma are monoclonal in origin. Whether the same is true for ovarian tumors of low malignant potential is not known. We compared peritoneal and ovarian tumors from women with advanced-stage ovarian papillary serous tumors of low malignant potential to determine whether the peritoneal tumors arose from the same clone as the ovarian tumors.

METHODS

We studied the clonality of 73 peritoneal and ovarian tumors from 18 women with advanced-stage ovarian papillary serous tumors of low malignant potential. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumors and representative normal tissues were sectioned and stained with hematoxylin-eosin, representative sections from separate tumors were manually microdissected, genomic DNA was extracted from the microdissected tumors, and the polymerase chain reaction was used to amplify a CAG polymorphic site in the human androgen receptor locus on the X chromosome to determine the inactivation pattern of the X chromosome and the clonality of the tumors.

RESULTS

The pattern of X-chromosome inactivation could be determined from the tumors of 13 of 18 patients. Of the 13 patients, seven (54%) had nonrandom inactivation of the X chromosome, and six of the seven had different inactivation patterns in the peritoneal and ovarian tumors. Three of these patients also had different patterns of nonrandom X-chromosome inactivation in tumors from each ovary. The remaining six patients had random patterns of X-chromosome inactivation in the peritoneal and ovarian tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that peritoneal and ovarian tumors of low malignant potential arise independently.

Behavior of Borderline Tumors With Particular Interest to Persistence, Recurrence, and Progression to Invasive Carcinoma: A Prospective Study

PURPOSE: Borderline tumors account for 10% to 20% of epithelial ovarian tumors, and their prognosis is outstanding; nevertheless, a mortality of up to 20% has been reported, particularly in earlier reports. There is a lack of information about the actual mortality and the rate of progression into invasive carcinoma in large and prospectively accrued populations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: All women with borderline ovarian tumors undergoing primary surgery in our department or referred within 3 months from surgery performed elsewhere from 1982 to 1997 were prospectively accrued and observed.

RESULTS: We studied 339 women (83.4% stage I, 7.9% stage II, and 8.5% stage III). The median age at diagnosis was 39 years. A total of 150 women underwent radical surgery, and 189 underwent fertility-sparing surgery. After surgery, 13 women had macroscopic residual disease. With a median follow-up of 70 months, 317 women are alive with no clinical disease (eight with documented subclinical persistence of implants), three are alive with clinical disease, two died of disease, 10 died of other reasons, and seven women have been lost to follow-up. The recurrence of disease was higher after fertility-sparing surgery (35 of 189 cases) than after radical surgery (seven of 150 cases); nevertheless, all but one woman with recurrence of borderline tumor or progression to carcinoma after conservative surgery were salvaged. We observed seven progressions (2.0%) into invasive carcinoma, five in serous tumors (2.4%), and two in mucinous tumors (1.6%). The disease-free survival is 99.6% in stage I patients, 95.8% in stage II, and 89% in stage III.

CONCLUSION: The survival of patients with borderline tumors is higher than previously described in some retrospective studies. Conservative surgery is safe and may be proposed to several patients with early and disseminated disease after thorough discussion of all therapeutic options. Progression to carcinoma is approximately 2% and may be observed in both mucinous and serous tumors.

Mucinous tumors of the ovary: a clinicopathologic study of 196 borderline tumors (of intestinal type) and carcinomas, including an evaluation of 11 cases with 'pseudomyxoma peritonei'

Mucinous ovarian neoplasms other than cystadenomas and adenofibromas have been classified as either borderline tumors or carcinomas for many years. Borderline tumors have been subdivided more recently into endocervical-like (mullerian) and intestinal forms. Such a distinction is rarely made in the mucinous carcinoma category. We did not encounter a pure endocervical-like carcinoma in the present series. Criteria for distinguishing an intestinal-type mucinous borderline tumor from a mucinous carcinoma have been controversial. In this study of 164 mucinous borderline tumors of intestinal type and 32 mucinous carcinomas, the former were further subdivided into 74 cases with epithelial atypia only and 90 with focal intraepithelial carcinoma. Of the 67 stage I tumors in the borderline (with atypia) category, all 49 with follow-up data were clinically benign; in the seven cases that had been designated stage III, the intraoperative appearance was that of "pseudomyxoma peritonei," which was fatal in four cases. Most of these tumors, however, were probably metastatic to the ovary rather than truly primary borderline tumors, although failure to examine the appendix in six cases compromised their interpretation. All 90 mucinous borderline tumors that had foci of intraepithelial carcinoma were recorded as stage I, but two of the 69 patients with follow-up data (3%) had fatal recurrences. Both of these tumors were incompletely staged, however, and one had ruptured intraoperatively. Thirty-two invasive carcinomas were subdivided into 12 expansile and 20 infiltrative subtypes; within the latter category seven tumors were only microinvasive. All 12 carcinomas with only expansile invasion were stage I; none of the 10 with follow-up data recurred. All seven microinvasive infiltrative carcinomas were stage I; none of the five with follow-up data recurred. One of five patients with stage I infiltrative carcinomas that were more than microinvasive and were adequately followed had a fatal recurrence, but staging had been incomplete in that case. Seven of the remaining eight infiltrative carcinomas were higher than stage I: five of the six (83%) with follow-up data persisted or recurred and were fatal. Considering all stages, increasing tumor grade in the carcinoma category correlated with an unfavorable outcome. However, grade did not influence prognosis in stage I carcinomas. Among 13 stage I cases in all categories with either preoperative or intraoperative tumor rupture and follow-up data, one recurred, a tumor in the borderline with intraepithelial carcinoma category. "Pseudomyxoma peritonei" is an ill-defined term and should not be used as a pathologic diagnosis. The presence of mucin in the abdominal cavity requires careful histologic evaluation to characterize it for prognostic purposes. Adequate and sometimes extensive sampling of mucinous ovarian tumors, the appendix and the peritoneum in cases of "pseudomyxoma peritonei" is necessary to achieve an accurate diagnosis and prognosis.

Ovarian serous borderline tumors: a critical review of the literature with emphasis on prognostic indicators

BACKGROUND

The behavior of ovarian serous borderline tumors (SBTs) and significance of various prognostic factors are unclear and difficult to evaluate because of inconsistencies and confusion in the literature. Recent studies have suggested that the morphological features of the primary tumor (presence or absence of micropapillary features) and the peritoneal "implants" (presence or absence of invasive features) can reliably subclassify SBTs into benign and malignant types. The aim of the current review was to test two hypotheses. First, that the alleged malignant behavior of SBTs is poorly documented, and second, that the morphological features of the primary ovarian tumors and the associated peritoneal implants are sufficient to separate SBTs into benign and malignant types, thereby obviating the need for the category.

METHODS

245 studies reporting approximately 18,000 patients with borderline ovarian tumors were reviewed. After excluding series that lacked clinical follow-up or were not analyzable for other reasons, there remained 97 reports that included 4,129 patients. In addition to recurrences and survival, we evaluated the type of peritoneal implants, microinvasion, lymph node involvement, late recurrences, and progression to carcinoma, as these features have served as the underpinning of the concept of "borderline malignancy" or "low malignant potential."

RESULTS

Among 4,129 patients with SBTs reviewed, the recurrence rate after a mean follow-up of 6.7 years was 0.27% per year for stage I tumors, the disease-free survival was 98.2%, and the overall disease-specific survival rate was 99.5%. For patients with advanced-stage tumors, the recurrence rate was 2.4% per year. However, the majority (69%) of reported recurrences were not pathologically documented, and only 26 cases (8.4% of all recurrences) were documented to have recurred from an adequately sampled ovarian tumor. The most reliable prognostic indicator for advanced stage tumors was the type of peritoneal implant. After 7.4 years of follow-up, the survival of patients with noninvasive peritoneal inplants was 95.3%, as compared with 66% for invasive implants (P < .0001). Microinvasion in the primary ovarian tumor was associated with a 100% survival rate at 6.7 years, and lymph node involvement was associated with a 98% survival rate at 6.5 years. The few reported cases of stage IV disease, progression to invasive carcinoma, and very late (>20 years) recurrences were poorly documented. The survival for all stages among approximately 373 patients in 6 prospective randomized trials followed for a mean of 6.7 years was 100%.

CONCLUSION

Surgical pathological stage and subclassification of extraovarian disease into invasive and noninvasive implants are the most important prognostic indicators for SBTs. Survival for stage I tumors is virtually 100%. Survival for advanced stage tumors with noninvasive implants is 95.3%, whereas survival for tumors with invasive implants is 66%. Invasive implants behave as carcinomas and are most likely metastatic. The precise nature of so-called noninvasive implants is not clear, but they behave in a benign fashion. The presence of a micropapillary architecture in the primary ovarian tumor is a strong predictor of invasive implants. These data support the recommendation that ovarian tumors with a micropapillary architecture be designated "micropapillary serous carcinomas," and those lacking these features, "atypical proliferative serous tumors."

The management of borderline epithelial tumors of the ovary

The histopathological diagnosis and treatment of borderline epithelial tumors of the ovary (BTO) still pose problems to both pathologists and gynecologists. BTO is a disease of younger, fertile females and generally has an excellent prognosis. A minority of patients, however, succumb to this disease. A review of the literature is given addressing aspects of epidemiology, histology, treatment and prognosis, resulting in a proposal for the management of serous and mucinous borderline tumors of the ovary.

Epidemiologic differences between women with borderline ovarian tumors and women with epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to study the relationship between borderline ovarian tumors (BLOT) and epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) by comparing the epidemiologic features of women with BLOT with those of women with EOC of similar histology.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The epidemiologic features of 32 women with serous and mucinous BLOT were compared with those of 273 women with primary serous or mucinous EOC. We included all women with the documented respective histologic diagnoses admitted to Roswell Park Cancer Institute between 1982 and 1996 who returned a self-administered epidemiologic questionnaire which contained 44 items pertaining to reproductive, contraceptive, medical, social, dietary, occupational, and family histories of cancer. Individual variables between both groups were compared using the Student t test, chi2 analysis, the Mantel-Haenszel test, and the Wilcoxon nonparametric test. Two-tailed P < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

The response rate to the questionnaire was 63% in the BLOT group and 60% in the EOC group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in geographic location, race, education, income, smoking, marital status, age at first pregnancy, age at first birth, history of hysterectomy, history of infertility, history of tubal surgery, use of hormone replacement therapy, or history of diaphragm or intrauterine contraceptive device use. There were no significant differences in family history of malignancy between women with BLOT and those with EOC. Women with BLOT were significantly younger than those with EOC (mean age 47 +/- 14.0 versus 56 +/- 13.7, P < 0.01). There was an apparent difference in oral contraceptive pill use between both groups. However, when we adjusted for age by stratification this difference was not significant (P = 0.089).

CONCLUSIONS

The epidemiologic features of women with BLOT are similar to those of women with EOC with the exception of an earlier age of onset. These findings might be consistent with one etiology for both conditions.

Evaluation of diagnostic criteria and behavior of ovarian intestinal-type mucinous tumors: atypical proliferative (borderline) tumors and intraepithelial, microinvasive, invasive, and metastatic carcinomas

Histologic criteria for the distinction of ovarian mucinous borderline tumors (MBTs) from invasive mucinous carcinomas (MUCCAs) and the definitions of intraepithelial (noninvasive) carcinoma and microinvasion are controversial. Accurate assessment of the behavior of these tumors has been obscured by inclusion of cases of pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP), an entity of extraovarian origin, and misclassification of the ovarian tumors in PMP and metastatic mucinous carcinomas (METCAs) as either advanced-stage MBTs or primary ovarian MUCCAs. One hundred thirty-six intestinal-type ovarian mucinous tumors without PMP were evaluated for the presence of stromal invasion, marked cytologic atypia, epithelial stratification of more than three cell layers, and necrosis. Criteria for the diagnosis of MBT, MBT with intraepithelial carcinoma, MBT with microinvasion (MIBT), MUCCA, and METCA were established and correlated with behavior. Twenty-three (59%) of 39 patients whose tumors had stromal invasion of more than 5 mm died of disease. Stromal invasion of more than 5 mm was the sole feature that correlated with a poor prognosis. In the absence of this feature, marked cytologic atypia, epithelial stratification of more than three layers, microinvasion (<5 mm), or necrosis did not have an adverse effect on survival. Tumors were classified as MBT (n = 65; 48%) based on absence of stromal invasion, regardless of degree of cytologic atypia or epithelial stratification; of these, 28 (43%) qualified as intraepithelial carcinoma based on epithelial stratification of more than three cell layers or marked cytologic atypia. Tumors with stromal invasion of less than 5 mm were classified as MIBT (n = 8; 6%). Tumors with stromal invasion of more than 5 mm were classified as MUCCA (n = 24; 18%). Tumors with a nodular pattern of stromal invasion, morphology inconsistent with ovarian origin, or a primary site elsewhere were classified as METCA (n = 35; 26%). Four tumors could not be definitively classified. Of the 86 cases with follow-up (median, 33 months) all MBTs (n = 44) and MIBTs (n = 6) were stage I, with 5-year survival rates of 100%. MUCCAs (n = 17) that were stage I had a 5-year survival rate of 91%; all patients with advanced-stage MUCCA died of disease. Five-year survival rate for METCAs (n = 19) was 11%. METCAs were more common than MUCCAs but can mimic MUCCAs and MBTs clinically and histologically. In the absence of a primary site elsewhere, METCA should be strongly suspected when there is bilateral surface involvement and a characteristic nodular pattern of invasion. It is important to recognize this pattern because 5-year survival rate for METCA (11%) was substantially less than that of MUCCA (all stages, 51%) and MBT (100%). Because all MBTs, regardless of degree of atypia or stratification, were stage I and benign, we prefer to designate them as atypical proliferative mucinous tumors. Marked cytologic atypia, epithelial stratification of more than three layers, and microinvasion (<5 mm) had no effect on the behavior of MBT. Noninvasive mucinous tumors with marked cytologic atypia or excessive epithelial stratification can be interpreted as atypical proliferative tumors with intraepithelial carcinoma and those with microinvasion can be designated as atypical proliferative tumors with microinvasion; these tumors appear to represent transitional stages in ovarian mucinous carcinogenesis.

Serous borderline tumors of the ovary with noninvasive peritoneal implants

BACKGROUND

The authors conducted this study to update their experience with patients who have ovarian serous borderline tumors with noninvasive peritoneal implants, with the objectives of gaining additional insight into the biologic behavior of these tumors and understanding better the effects of postoperative treatment.

METHODS

Seventy-three patients who had ovarian serous borderline tumors with noninvasive peritoneal implants were identified in a retrospective review. Major end points selected for analysis were surgicopathologic response, time to relapse, type of relapse, progression free survival, and overall survival. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were also performed.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 10.3 years. Of 20 patients with macroscopic residual disease at completion of initial surgery who subsequently underwent second-look surgery, 3 (15%) had a response to chemotherapy. Twenty-two of 73 patients (30%) either developed progressive disease or had a relapse. The median time from the date of diagnosis to relapse was 7.1 years. Tissue was available from 20 of the 22 patients who had a relapse; 14 (70%) had invasive low grade serous carcinomas, and 6 (30%) had recurrent borderline tumors. Age was the only factor studied that had a significant influence on survival (P = 0.03). In both univariate and multivariate proportional hazards models, age and residual disease were found to be of borderline significance in predicting cancer specific survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 30% of patients who have ovarian serous borderline tumors with noninvasive peritoneal implants will develop progressive or recurrent tumors, most commonly serous carcinomas. The presence of macroscopic residual disease appears to be a predictor of disease free survival. In this study, however, the authors were unable to elucidate the role of postoperative therapy or determine criteria for selecting patients for such therapy.

Borderline ovarian malignancy: ultrasound and fast dynamic MR findings

Ovarian tumors of borderline malignancy are low-grade malignant neoplasms, and have a rather good prognosis. They account for approximately 10-20% of all ovarian tumors. Very few reports available in literature that analyses ultrasound and MR findings in establishing the diagnosis. The purpose of this study is to describe eight cases of ovarian tumors of borderline malignancy with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Comparison is made with CA 125 serum levels and ultrasound findings. Early enhancing endocystic vegetations, local cystic masses in, and (irregular) thickened walls of large multicystic tumors were important findings in borderline malignant tumors. The accuracy to detect a malignant tumor of borderline malignancy with CA 125, ultrasound and MRI in these eight cases was 50, 63 and 75%, respectively. MRI is a valuable imaging modality to characterize adnexal tumors and might play a role in preoperative evaluation of borderline malignancies.

Analysis of CD44 expression in serous and mucinous borderline tumours of the ovary: comparison with cystadenomas and overt carcinomas

AIMS

To determine the diagnostic and prognostic value of the immunohistochemical analysis of CD44 variants in benign borderline and malignant tumours of the ovary.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The reactivity of tumour cells with three monoclonal antibodies, respectively, directed to all CD44 variants, CD44-v3 isoform and CD44-v6 isoform, was assessed by using an indirect immunoperoxidase technique applied to formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples of 36 cases of borderline, as compared to 20 cases of benign tumours and 20 cases of carcinomas. CD44 variants were detected in 97% of borderline tumours, as compared to 60% of benign tumours and 100% of carcinomas. CD44-v3 was detected in 25% of borderline tumours, as compared to 0% of benign tumours (P = 0.003) and 55% of carcinomas (P = 0.065). The expression of CD44-v6 was detected in 28% of borderline tumours, as compared to 20% of benign tumours and 30% of carcinomas. In borderline tumours, as in carcinomas, CD44-v6, but not CD44-v3, expression was correlated with an increased proliferative index and with a higher incidence of p53 expression.

CONCLUSION

Borderline tumours of the ovary present frequent quantitative and qualitative alterations in the pattern of expression of CD44 proteins. However, these alterations are unlikely to represent useful diagnostic or prognostic markers.

Differential expression of trypsin in human ovarian carcinomas and low-malignant-potential tumors

It is widely recognized that matrix metalloproteinases and serine proteinases play an important role in cancer invasion and metastasis. We have reported that trypsin is synthesized in ovarian carcinomas as well as in some other types of cancers. In general, ovarian cancers easily tend to invade, metastasize, and spread widely into the peritoneal cavity. However, low-malignant-potential (LMP, borderline tumor) ovarian tumors are known to have limited malignant potential for progression, although microinvasion and distant metastasis have been reported among them. To analyze the relationship between varied degrees of trypsin expression and malignant behavior of ovarian tumors, immunohistochemical studies with monoclonal antibodies to human trypsin and clinicopathologic analysis were performed in human ovarian carcinomas, low-malignant-potential tumors, and benign cystadenomas. Thirteen (44.8%) cases of 29 ovarian carcinomas showed prominent trypsin expression, while only 2 (18.2%) cases of 11 LMP ovarian tumors demonstrated low levels of expression. Benign tumors and normal ovaries did not show any positivity for trypsin. These data suggest that tumor-derived heterotropic trypsin may be associated with ovarian tumors in parallel with malignant potential or behavior such as invasiveness or metastasis. At least in some ovarian carcinomas, prominent stromal invasion or metastasis might require the acquisition of or association with tumor-derived trypsin production.

Sonographic and Doppler flow characteristics of ovarian tumors of low-malignant potential

OBJECTIVE

To outline the sonographic and color Doppler flow imaging characteristics of ovarian tumors of low-malignant potential (OCLMP).

METHODS

Fourteen women with ovarian tumors of low-malignant potential were compared with 26 women with ovarian cystadenomas and 23 with ovarian carcinomas.

RESULTS

Sonographically, more complex structures and echogenic lesions were found in the OCLMP and malignant tumors than in the cystadenomas, and the difference was statistically significant. Color blood flow imaging revealed a similar resistant index (RI) in the OCLMP (0.487 +/- 0.07) and cystadenomas (0.489 +/- 0.09) when compared with statistically significant lower RI in the ovarian carcinomas (0.391 +/- 0.05) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among young women, the combination of a complex ovarian mass with turbid fluid and echogenic lesions whose color Doppler flow imaging registers in the low range (RI < 0.5) should raise the suspicion of an ovarian tumor of low-malignant potential.

Fertility drugs and ovarian cancer

Recent case reports of ovarian cancer associated with infertility treatment raise the question of a possible etiopathogenetic role of fertility drugs in ovarian cancer. In this paper, the possible relationship between infertility treatment and ovarian cancer is reviewed with respect to the epidemiological and pathogenetic profiles of ovarian cancer and the potential risk factors associated with fertility drugs; a case report review and a critical reappraisal are also provided within this article. Currently available data in the literature, from epidemiological studies and case reports, suggest that a direct causal effect of infertility treatment on ovarian cancer seems unlikely. Since infertile women are likely to have a higher risk for the development of ovarian cancer, and the role of fertility drugs in the etiopathogenesis of ovarian carcinoma is not established, a close clinical examination of infertile patients before, during and after infertility treatment is recommended. Moreover, further investigation is required to resolve the question of the possible association between fertility drugs and ovarian cancer through large prospective epidemiological or retrospective case-control studies.

Clinical behavior of borderline ovarian tumors: a study of 150 cases

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the clinical features, treatment, and survival status of the patients with borderline ovarian tumors.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the charts of 150 patients with borderline ovarian tumor registered at the Tokai Ovarian Tumor Study Group from January 1, 1980, to December 31, 1994, was conducted to obtain clinical and pathological information.

RESULTS

In stage II and III disease, the numbers of patients with no residual tumor, residual tumor of <2 cm, 2-5 cm, and >5 cm were 9, 10, 3, and 3, respectively. The sizes of residual tumors and corresponding clinical response to chemotherapy were as follows: residual tumor of <2 cm, complete response (CR), 6 patients; no change (NC), 2; progressive disease (PD), 2; tumors 2-5 cm, NC, 1 patient, PD, 2; tumors >5 cm, PD, 3 patients. The survival for patients with residual tumor <2 cm was significantly better than for those with residual tumor from 2-5 cm and of >5 cm (P < 0.05). The survival for patients with stage II and III serous tumor was significantly longer than that for patients with stage II and III mucinous tumor (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In advanced borderline ovarian tumor, the prognosis of patients with gross residual tumor after initial surgery, and especially with mucinous tumor, was poor.

Subclassification of serous borderline tumors of the ovary into benign and malignant types. A clinicopathologic study of 65 advanced stage cases

Poor outcome in serous borderline tumors (SBT) of the ovary is limited to patients with advanced stage disease. This study was designed to determine whether there are histologic features among advanced-stage SBTs (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] stages II and III) that predict behavior. The 65 cases in the study were divided into three groups: typical SBTs, with noninvasive implants (51 cases), SBTs with invasive implants (three cases), and a recently described tumor, designated micropapillary serous carcinoma (MPSC) (11 cases), a proliferative serous ovarian neoplasm that often lacks destructive infiltrative growth but appears to behave as a low-grade invasive carcinoma. When the tumor lacks infiltrative growth, as it did in the 11 cases in this series, it qualifies as a borderline tumor. After censoring nontumor deaths, the 5- and 10-year actuarial survival rates were 98% for SBTs with noninvasive implants, 33% for SBTs with invasive implants, and 81% at 5 years and 71% at 10 years for MPSCs. The mean follow-up was 100 months. Two (4%) of 51 patients with SBTs with noninvasive implants subsequently developed invasive carcinoma, and one (2%) died of carcinoma. In contrast, two (67%) of three women with SBTs accompanied by invasive implants developed invasive carcinoma, and both died of disease. Finally, of the 11 patients with MPSC, seven (64%), all of whom had invasive implants, developed recurrences of invasive carcinoma and/or died of tumor. MPSCs had significantly higher rates of mortality (p < 0.001) and recurrence as invasive carcinoma (p < .002) than SBTs with noninvasive implants. The recognition that SBTs can be divided into benign and malignant subtypes provides the basis for replacing the borderline category. The benign subgroup is composed of typical SBTs, including those with noninvasive implants for which the term atypical proliferative serous tumor is appropriate. In contrast, tumors displaying a micropapillary growth pattern (MPSC) and SBTs with invasive implants should be classified as carcinomas and treated accordingly.

Borderline ovarian tumors

Borderline tumor of the ovary (BOT) is an epithelial tumor with a low rate of growth and a low potential to invade or metastasize. This tumor often is associated with a significantly better prognosis than epithelial ovarian cancer. Most tumors are either serous or mucinous in histology and present as early stage lesions. However, stage III lesions with peritoneal implants are not uncommon. Patients with early stage lesions have an excellent prognosis. Patients with higher stage lesions have a worse prognosis. Long-term follow-up of patients with BOT is required since the tumor can recur up to 20 years after the initial diagnosis. Recently, investigators have begun to identify subsets of patients with a worse prognosis, such as patients with aneuploid tumors. Treatment for early stage lesions is surgical and conservative surgery can be accomplished successfully in younger patients who desire to maintain fertility. Treatment for later stage lesions has been approached in a variety of ways. All approaches initially begin with maximal cytoreductive surgery. Studies suggest that early stage disease should be managed with surgery alone. Conflicting results on the usefulness of adjuvant therapy for patients with later stage disease have been obtained. At this time, the usefulness of adjuvant therapy for advanced disease remains undetermined. Further understanding of the basis of the disease and analysis of specific higher risk subsets might identify patients in whom adjuvant therapy could be tested in the setting of controlled clinical trials.

Ovarian papillary serous tumors of low malignant potential (serous borderline tumors). A long-term follow-up study, including patients with microinvasion, lymph node metastasis, and transformation to invasive serous carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The clinical outcome of patients with ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential (LMP) remains controversial, especially for those with extraovarian disease. We retrospectively reviewed our experience to study this question further, to assess the safety of conservative management of patients with limited disease, and to determine whether exophytic ovarian surface tumor was predictive of tumor recurrence.

METHODS

The clinical and pathologic records of 76 patients with ovarian serous LMP tumors accessioned at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation from 1979 to 1990 were reviewed. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging was retrospectively assigned, follow-up information obtained, and clinicopathologic correlations made.

RESULTS

An exophytic ovarian surface component was present in 39 of 76 patients (51%). Stage II or III disease was present in 28 of 74 staged patients (38%). Follow-up information was available on 66 patients, ranging from 8 to 264 months (mean, 99 months). Twenty-five patients of 66 patients with follow-up information (38%) received adjuvant therapy. Only 1 patient (1.5%) developed progressive disease; she died of widespread invasive serous carcinoma. Two of 18 conservatively managed patients (11%) developed "recurrent" disease, including 1 patient with a second primary serous LMP tumor of the preserved ovary and 1 patient with an incidentally discovered microscopic serosal implant. There were no other recurrences in the study group, which included four patients with stromal microinvasion and one with lymph node involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

The long term outcome of serous LMP tumors is extremely favorable. Exophytic ovarian surface tumor did not serve as a predictor for subsequent peritoneal implants. Conservative surgical management in young patients with localized disease is supported and the use of adjuvant therapy in the initial management of patients with advanced tumors is further questioned.

Ovarian tumors of low malignant potential. Correlation of DNA index and S-phase fraction with histopathologic grade and clinical outcome

BACKGROUND

DNA ploidy and/or S-phase fraction have been used as biologic predictors of aggressive behavior in a variety of solid tumors, including ovarian carcinomas. Recently, attention has focused on borderline lesions to determine if flow cytometry plays a role in separating potentially aggressive tumors from those which will pursue a more innocuous course.

METHODS

Paraffin-embedded tissue from 42 tumors with low malignant potential (LMP) were analyzed by flow cytometry (FC) to determine the DNA index (DI) and S-phase fraction (SPF). These result were then correlated with conventional pathologic parameters (size, nuclear grade, architecture, and mitotic index) and with clinical parameters (stage and age). Statistical analysis was carried out using the Fisher's Exact and Kruskal-Wallis tests.

RESULTS

Thirty-five cases (83.3%) were diploid, while 7 cases (16.7%) showed aneuploid stemlines, with a mean DI of 1.2 (range: 1.1-1.4). The mean SPF was 3.5% for the diploid tumors and 4.5% for the aneuploid tumors. Serous tumors comprised 74% of our cases; the remainder were either mucinous or endometrioid tumors. Complex solid architectural patterns were found in 29 tumors whereas high nuclear grade was seen in 24. A mitotic rate (MR) of 0-3/10 high power fields was seen in 29 tumors (69%), with only 5 having 10 or more mitotic figures. Aneuploidy statistically correlated with higher stage (P < 0.009). Marginal correlation was seen with a larger tumor size (P = 0.06). SPF showed a direct linear correlation with MR (P < 0.001). Also, smaller SPF's were seen in the serous tumors versus the mucinous and endometroid group (P < 0.05). Two patients with diploid and one patient with aneuploid stemlines had recurrent disease during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

DI and SPF correlated with some of the histologic parameters we evaluated. DI and SPF, however, could not predict which tumor(s) would behave in a more aggressive fashion.

Current concepts in management of epithelial ovarian tumors of low malignant potential

Approximately 15 percent of epithelial ovarian tumors are tumors of LMP. Epithelial stratification, cellular atypia, mitotic activity, and abscence of ovarian stromal invasion set the histopathological criteria for diagnosis. Serous and mucinous tumors of LMP represent 80 to 95% of all cases. These tumors occur in patients at a younger age than those with invasive cancer and many times in fertile women who have not accomplished their family planning yet. Ovarian tumors of low malignant potential carry a favorable prognosis in comparison to invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. The recurrence rate after surgery for these tumors ranges from 10 percent to 30 percent, occurring as late as 10 or more years after presentation. The majority of patients (80-92 percent) with ovarian tumors of LMP present with stage I disease. Peritoneal implants display a range of histologic appearances, ranging from benign glands to those with features of invasive disease. Tumor markers such as CA-125 are not as useful in tumors of LMP as in invasive ovarian carcinoma. Elevated CA-125 are found only in patients with advanced serous tumors of LMP; thus, other markers such as transvaginal Doppler measurements of vascular resistant index has been suggested for possible differentiation between a benign and LMP ovarian tumors before surgery. Primary conservative surgery consisting of unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is considered to be an appropriate treatment for young women with stage Ia ovarian tumors of LMP who wish to retain their fertility potential. Up to 70 percent of women who underwent conservative surgery subsequently conceive.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

DNA-cytophotometry and immunocytochemistry in ovarian tumours of borderline malignancy and related peritoneal lesions

A total of 34 surgical specimens, obtained from 13 patients with ovarian tumours of borderline malignancy (OTBM), were investigated by conventional histology, immunocytochemistry and DNA cytophotometry. The lesions were obtained by primary ovarian surgery or second-look procedures and altogether comprised 19 (single and bilateral) OTBM, 8 cases of endosalpingiosis, 4 in situ and 2 invasive peritoneal implants and 1 overt adenocarcinoma. The morphological findings were related to follow-up data, which showed neoplasms with clinically malignant behaviour in 2 patients. The histology of the extra-ovarian manifestations was not associated with their immunocytochemical properties or with their DNA content. There were no correlations between the evolution of disease and microscopical features but the clinical course appeared to be linked to the DNA content of the extra-ovarian lesions, which was of greater prognostic importance than DNA ploidy of the ovarian tumours. Recurrence-free survival was noted in all 5 patients with diploid or euploid extra-ovarian proliferations, while the 2 clinically malignant cases fell into the group of 3 patients with noneuploid or aneuploid specimens. DNA estimations may be a methodology which increases the prognostic value of second-look procedures in OTBM patients.