End of life care for patients with meningioma

"Not me!" a qualitative, vignette-based study of nurses' and physicians' reactions to spiritual distress on neuro-oncological units

PURPOSE

People with primary malignant brain tumors experience serious health-related suffering caused by limited prognosis and high symptom burden. Consequently, neuro-oncological healthcare workers can be affected emotionally in a negative way. The aim of this study was to analyze the attitudes and behavior of nurses and physicians when confronted with spiritual distress in these patients.

METHODS

Neurospirit-DE is a qualitative vignette-based, multicenter, cross-sectional online survey that was conducted in Bavaria, Germany. Reflexive thematic analysis was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 143 nurses and physicians working in neurological and neurosurgical wards in 46 hospitals participated in the survey. The participants questioned if the ability to provide spiritual care can be learned or is a natural skill. Spiritual care as a responsibility of the whole team was highlighted, and the staff reflected on the appropriate way of involving spiritual care experts. The main limitations to spiritual care were a lack of time and not viewing spiritual engagement as part of the professional role. Some were able to personally benefit from spiritual conversations with patients, but many participants criticized the perceived emotional burden while expressing the imminent need for specific training and team reflection.

CONCLUSIONS

Most neuro-oncological nurses and physicians perceive spiritual care as part of their duty and know how to alleviate the patient's spiritual distress. Nonetheless, validation of spiritual assessment tools for neuro-oncology and standardized documentation of patients' distress, shared interprofessional training, and reflection on the professional and personal challenges faced when confronted with spiritual care in neuro-oncology require further improvement and training.

The experience of living with malignant meningioma

OBJECTIVES

Meningiomas are the most common, primary intracranial tumor and most are benign. Little is known of the rare patient group living with a malignant meningioma, comprising 1-3% of all meningiomas. Our aim was to explore how patients perceived quality of daily life after a malignant meningioma diagnosis.

METHODS

This qualitative explorative study was composed of individual semi-structured interviews. Eligible patients (n = 12) were selected based on ability to participate in an interview, from a background population of 23 patients diagnosed with malignant meningioma at Rigshospitalet from 2000 to 2021. We performed an inductive thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke's guidelines.

RESULTS

Eight patients were interviewed. The analysis revealed 4 overarching themes: (1) perceived illness and cause of symptoms, (2) identity, roles, and interaction, (3) threat and uncertainty of the future, and (4) belief in authority. The perceived quality of daily life is negatively impacted by the disease. Patients experience a shift in self-concept and close interactions, and some struggle with accepting a new everyday life. Patients have a high risk of discordant prognostic awareness in relation to health-care professionals.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

We provide a much-needed patient-centered perspective of living with malignant meningioma: quality of life was affected by perception of threat and an uncertainty of the future. Perception of illness and the interpretation of the cause of symptoms varied between subjects, but a common trait was that patients' identity, roles, and interactions were affected. Shared decision-making and a strengthened continuity during follow-up could aid this rare patient group.

Granular clinical history and outcome in 51 patients with primary and secondary malignant meningioma

OBJECTIVE

WHO grade III meningiomas, also known as malignant meningiomas (MMs), are rare, and the heterogenous clinical course in patients with MM is not well described. To characterize the clinical course of patients with MM, granular clinical data were gathered from 51 patients treated at the Department of Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Rigshospitalet, in Copenhagen, Denmark, between 2000 and 2020.

METHODS

The authors investigated outcome and timing in terms of 1) tumor progression and grade transformation in patients previously diagnosed with WHO grade I or II meningiomas (patients with a secondary MM [sMM]); 2) performance status and complications following surgery; and 3) transition to noncurative treatment and ultimately death. Complications, time between recurrences, and outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score) for every surgery were analyzed, both malignant and premalignant.

RESULTS

Of the 51 patients, 24 (47%) had an sMM. The time to WHO grade III transformation in the sMM group varied widely (median 5.5 years, range 0.5-22 years), but after transformation to a WHO grade III tumor, patients with an sMM and those with a primary MM (pMM) did not differ significantly in overall survival and cumulative risk of progression. Median overall survival for all 51 patients was 4.2 years (95% CI 2.6-7.2 years). Time from the decision to shift from curative to noncurative treatment until death was 3.8 months and the 30-day mortality rate following surgery was 11.8%. From a cumulative number of 151 surgeries, 10 surgeries were followed by improvement on the mRS, mRS score was unchanged in 70, and it worsened in 71. The MM was the underlying cause of death in 30 of 31 patients who had died at the end of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Together, these findings clearly show a significant morbidity and mortality from the disease itself and from the treatment. These findings warrant studies of prognostic factors for earlier support and adjuvant measures in MM and identify a need for better palliative strategies in this patient group.