Emergency short-stay wards and boarding time in emergency departments: A propensity-score matching study

Effect of emergency physician-operated emergency short-stay ward on emergency department stay length and clinical outcomes: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that an emergency short-stay ward (ESSW) mainly operated by emergency medicine physicians may reduce the length of patient stay in emergency department without expense of clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed adult patients who visited the emergency department of the study hospital and were subsequently admitted to wards from 2017 to 2019. We divided study participants into three groups: patients admitted to ESSW and treated by the department of emergency medicine (ESSW-EM), patients admitted to ESSW and treated by other departments (ESSW-Other) and patients admitted to general wards (GW). The co-primary outcomes were ED length of stay and 28-day hospital mortality.

RESULTS

In total, 29,596 patients were included in the study, and 8,328 (31.3%), 2,356 (8.9%), and 15,912 (59.8%) of them were classified as ESSW-EM, ESSW-Other and GW groups, respectively. The ED length of stay of the ESSW-EM (7.1 h ± 5.4) was shorter than those of the ESSW-Other (8.0 ± 6.2, P < 0.001) and the GW (10.2 ± 9.8, P < 0.001 for both). Hospital mortality of ESSW-EM (1.9%) was lower than that of GW (4.1%, P < 0.001). In the multivariable linear regression analysis, the ESSW-EM was independently associated with shorter ED length of stay compared with the both ESSW-Other (coefficient, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.70-1.46; P < 0.001) and GW (coefficient, 3.35; 95% confidence interval, 3.12-3.57; P < 0.001). In the multivariable logistic regression analyses, the ESSW-EM was independently associated with lower hospital mortality compared with both the ESSW-Other group (adjusted P = 0.030) and the GW group (adjusted P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the ESSW-EM was independently associated with shorter ED length of stay compared with both the ESSW-Other and the GW in the adult ED patients. Independent association was found between the ESSW-EM and lower hospital mortality compared with the GW.

Effects of Emergency Transfer Coordination Center on Length of Stay of Critically Ill Patients in the Emergency Department

Introduction: Critically ill patients are frequently transferred from other hospitals to the emergency departments (ED) of tertiary hospitals. Due to the unforeseen transfer, the ED length of stay (LOS) of the patient is likely to be prolonged in addition to other potentially adverse effects. In this study we sought to confirm whether the establishment of an organized unit — the Emergency Transfer Coordination Center (ETCC) — to systematically coordinate emergency transfers would be effective in reducing the ED LOS of transferred, critically ill patients. Methods: The present study is a retrospective observational study focusing on patients who were transferred from other hospitals and admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of the ED in a tertiary hospital located in northwestern Seoul, the capital city of South Korea, from January 2019 – December 2020. The exposure variable of the study was ETCC approval before transfer, and ED LOS was the primary outcome. We used propensity score matching for comparison between the group with ETCC approval and the control group. Results: Included in the study were 1,097 patients admitted to the ICU after being transferred from other hospitals, of whom 306 (27.9%) were transferred with ETCC approval. The median ED LOS in the ETCC-approved group was significantly reduced to 277 minutes compared to 385 minutes in the group without ETCC approval. The ETCC had a greater effect on reducing evaluation time than boarding time, which was the same for populations with different clinical features. Conclusion: An ETCC can be effective in systematically reducing the ED LOS of critically ill patients who are transferred from other hospitals to tertiary hospitals that are experiencing severe crowding.

Effect of a Boarding Restriction Protocol on Emergency Department Crowding

PURPOSE

Access block due to the lack of hospital beds causes crowding of emergency departments (ED). We initiated the "boarding restriction protocol" that limits the time of stay in the ED for patients awaiting hospitalization to 24 hours from arrival. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the boarding restriction protocol on ED crowding.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The primary outcome was ED occupancy rate, which was calculated as the ratio of the number of occupying patients to the total number of ED beds. Time factors, such as length of stay (LOS), treatment time, and boarding time, were investigated.

RESULTS

The mean of the ED occupancy rate decreased from 1.532±0.432 prior to implementation of the protocol to 1.273±0.353 after (p<0.001). According to time series analysis, the absolute effect caused by the protocol was -0.189 (-0.277 to -0.110) (p=0.001). The proportion of patients with LOS exceeding 24 hours decreased from 7.6% to 4.0% (p<0.001). Among admitted patients, ED LOS decreased from 770.7 (421.4-1587.1) minutes to 630.2 (398.0-1156.8) minutes (p<0.001); treatment time increased from 319.6 (198.5-482.8) minutes to 344.7 (213.4-519.5) minutes (p<0.001); and boarding time decreased from 298.9 (109.5-1149.0) minutes to 204.1 (98.7-545.7) minutes (p<0.001). In pre-protocol period, boarding patients accumulated in the ED during the weekdays and resolved on Friday, but this pattern was alleviated in post-period.

CONCLUSION

The boarding restriction protocol was effective in alleviating ED crowding by reducing the accumulation of boarding patients in the ED during the weekdays.

Decreased size of the left anterior descending coronary artery is an independent predictor of deterioration in non-high-risk patients with acute pulmonary embolism

To evaluate the efficacy of measuring left coronary artery size to predict deterioration in non-high-risk acute pulmonary embolism (PE) patients. This retrospective study enrolled non-high-risk acute PE patients from January 2011 to December 2019. Patient deterioration was defined as the occurrence of adverse events within 30 days of hospital admission. Patients with adverse events were sex- and age-matched to patients without adverse events. Risk stratification was performed. Cross-sectional areas (CSAs) of the left main and left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery inlets were measured. The main pulmonary artery (MPA) inlet and outlet and MPA LAD plane, which adjoined the LAD in the MPA, were reconstructed. CSAs, perimeters, and hydraulic diameters were measured to evaluate MPA size and deformation. Cardiac volume was also measured. Quantitative parameters were divided into tertiles. After adjustment by risk stratification, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Correlations between different parameters were analysed. Seventy-three patients with adverse events were matched to 73 patients without adverse events. The results of the univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that LAD inlet CSAs (middle and high) predicted adverse events (odds ratio: 0.28 and 0.07, 95% confidence interval: 0.10-0.77 and 0.02-0.22, p = 0.013 and < 0.0001). LAD inlet CSA was strongly and negatively correlated with MPA LAD hydraulic diameter and CSA (correlation coefficients: - 0.643 and - 0.604, p < 0.001). LAD inlet CSA measurement would facilitate adverse event prediction in non-high-risk acute PE patients on the basis of risk stratification. The dilated MPA may involve the decrease in LAD inlet CSA.