Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®): barriers and solutions for nurses

The Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Spine Surgery in High and Low/Middle-income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

In this review article, we explore the implementation and outcomes of enhanced recovery after spine surgery (spine ERAS) across different World Bank country-income levels. A systematic literature search was conducted through PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL databases for articles on the implementation of spine ERAS in both adult and pediatric populations. Study characteristics, ERAS elements, and outcomes were analyzed and meta-analyses were performed for length of stay (LOS) and cost outcomes. The number of spine ERAS studies from low-middle-income countries (LMICs) increased since 2017, when the first spine ERAS implementation study was published. LMICs were more likely than high-income countries (HICs) to conduct studies on patients aged ≥18 years (odds ratio [OR], 6.00; 95% CI, 1.58-42.80), with sample sizes 51 to 100 (OR, 4.50; 95% CI, 1.21-22.90), and randomized controlled trials (OR, 7.25; 95% CI, 1.77-53.50). Preoperative optimization was more frequently implemented in LMICs than in HICs (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.06-4.41), and operation time was more often studied in LMICs (OR 3.78; 95% CI, 1.77-8.35). Implementation of spine ERAS resulted in reductions in LOS in both LMIC (-2.06; 95% CI, -2.47 to -1.64 d) and HIC (-0.99; 95% CI, -1.28 to -0.70 d) hospitals. However, spine ERAS implementation did result in a significant reduction in costs. This review highlights the global landscape of ERAS implementation in spine surgery, demonstrating its effectiveness in reducing LOS across diverse settings. Further research with standardized reporting of ERAS elements and outcomes is warranted to explore the impact of spine ERAS on cost-effectiveness and other patient-centered outcomes.

Exploring Patient Experiences With and Perceptions of Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Denmark

Although the use of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) is increasing worldwide, qualitative research on the patient experience with RAS is lacking. To understand patients' perioperative experiences, the authors conducted semi-structured interviews with five elective surgical patients from two regional hospitals. The interviews were structured to explore patient experiences that may reflect the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols. The transcribed interviews were analyzed, coded, and interpreted within a hermeneutic framework. Findings revealed three themes: perceptions of RAS as a surgical modality, preoperative preparation was soothing, and health care professionals influence the patient experience. The authors noted that although the participants reported limited knowledge of RAS, they generally felt positive about its use. The competence and demeanor of health care professionals may influence patients' experiences and perceptions of outcomes, and positive clinical outcomes may overcome negative perioperative experiences.

Obstacles to Compliance and Implementation of ERAS Protocol From Nursing Perspective: A Qualitative Study

PURPOSE

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a concept that covers evidence-based practices and requires multidisciplinary teamwork, and nurses play a key role in this team. This qualitative research is conducted to describe the experiences of nurses implementing ERAS and the obstacles they encounter in practice.

DESIGN

This research was conducted using the phenomenology pattern, one of the qualitative research designs.

METHODS

The research study group was determined by criterion sampling, one of the purposeful sampling methods.The criterion for participation in this study is to follow at least one of the steps of the ERAS protocol and volunteer to participate in the study. In this context, 12 nurses who met the inclusion criteria participated in the study. Data were obtained from May 1 to May 31, 2023 using an introductory information form and a semistructured interview form. The introductory information form asked questions such as age, gender, marital status, working year, ERAS application time, and total working year. The semistructured interview form, developed by the authors based on the related literature, consisted of four open-ended questions 1The obtained data were analyzed using the seven-step Colaizzi method.

FINDINGS

The study identified three themes: the importance of the ERAS protocol, the obstacles to the ERAS protocol, compliance with the ERAS protocol and applicability. Nine subthemes were found: reducing complications and accelerating the healing process, increasing the level of satisfaction, lack of knowledge, leader confusion, resistance to change, lack of team cooperation, policy, leadership, and education.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed the experiences of nurses who implement at least one component of ERAS protocols regarding the obstacles to the implementation of the protocol. As a result, nurses stated that lack of information and team cooperation, leader complexity, and resistance to change were obstacles to the protocol. Identifying the obstacles encountered in the implementation of the protocols is important for producing solution suggestions.

Clinicians' views on implementing enhanced recovery after surgery: a descriptive qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have existed for the past three decades; these protocols may improve patient outcomes and healthcare costs. Yet, ERAS is difficult to implement, and there has been limited focus on processes used to promote ERAS use. Thus, the aim of this study was to identify and describe the barriers and enablers to implementing ERAS.

METHODS

In this qualitative descriptive sub-study, semi-structured interviews, guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework, were conducted with surgeons, anaesthetists, and nurses. Interviews were analyzed using inductive and deductive content analysis.

RESULTS

Three categories were found, which mapped to 12 domains in the Theoretical Domains Framework. Category 1 'realizing the value of ERAS, despite varying levels of exposure and motivation' showed clinicians' different views and knowledge towards ERAS, with a general belief that ERAS was evidence-based. Category 2, 'building momentum for ERAS implementation' outlined strategies to encourage clinicians to practice ERAS. The final category 'providing resources for ERAS' illustrated the tools and up-front costs needed for ERAS implementation.

CONCLUSION

Motivational strategies are required to inspire individual clinicians to adopt ERAS. Additionally, resources are needed for ERAS to guide practice and support implementation (i.e., staffing and time), underscoring the need for hospital leadership support.

The EUPEMEN (EUropean PErioperative MEdical Networking) Protocol for Acute Appendicitis: Recommendations for Perioperative Care

Background/Objectives: Acute appendicitis (AA) is one of the most common causes of emergency department visits due to acute abdominal pain, with a lifetime risk of 7-8%. Managing AA presents significant challenges, particularly among vulnerable patient groups, due to its association with substantial morbidity and mortality. Methods: The EUPEMEN (European PErioperative MEdical Networking) project aims to optimize perioperative care for AA by developing multidisciplinary guidelines that integrate theoretical knowledge and clinical expertise from five European countries. This study presents the key elements of the EUPEMEN protocol, which focuses on reducing surgical stress, optimizing perioperative care, and enhancing postoperative recovery. Results: Through this standardized approach, the protocol aims to lower postoperative morbidity and mortality, shorten hospital stays, and improve overall patient outcomes. The recommendations are tailored to address the variability in clinical practice across Europe and are designed to be widely implementable in diverse healthcare settings. Conclusions: The conclusions drawn from this study highlight the potential for the EUPEMEN protocol to significantly improve perioperative care standards for AA, demonstrating its value as a practical, adaptable tool for clinicians.

An Evaluation Index System to Assess Nurse Competency in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs: A Delphi Study

PURPOSE

To construct an index system to evaluate the competencies of nurses in enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs and provide a scientific foundation for their training and assessment.

METHODS

Utilizing a literature review and semi-structured interviews, a preliminary indicator system was constructed. Based on the preliminary indicator system, a Delphi questionnaire was developed and utilized to achieve consensus among experts in two rounds of Delphi studies. The indicators were selected based on a mean importance score greater than 4 and a coefficient of variation less than .25. The weights of the indicators were calculated using the Analytic Hierarchy Process.

RESULTS

The study developed a system that evaluates the competencies of nurses involved in ERAS programs, offering a reference for their training and evaluation. The final index system includes 7 primary indicators, 20 secondary indicators, and 66 tertiary indicators. The primary indicators consist of competencies in the following components: 1) Direct clinical practice (20 items); 2) Expert coaching and guidance (9 items); 3) Consultation (6 items); 4) Research (7 items); 5) Leadership (11 items); 6) Collaboration (8 items); and 7) Ethical decision-making (5 items).

CONCLUSION

The developed competency evaluation index system is reliable and can serve as a foundation for the selection, training, and assessment of ERAS nurses.

Revolutionizing Surgical Care: The Power of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)

The development of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has brought about substantial transformations in perioperative care, substituting conventional methods with a patient-centric, evidence-based strategy. ERAS protocol adopts a holistic approach to patient care, which includes all stages preceding, during, and following the operation. These programs prioritize patient-specific therapies that are tailored to their specific requirements. Nutritional assessment and enhancement, patient education, minimally invasive procedures, and multimodal pain management are all fundamental components of ERAS. ERAS provides a multitude of advantages, including diminished postoperative complications, abbreviated hospital stays, heightened patient satisfaction, and healthcare cost reductions. This article examines the foundational tenets of ERAS, their incorporation into the field of general surgery, their suitability for diverse surgical specialties, the obstacles faced during implementation, and possible directions for further investigation, such as the integration of digital health technologies, personalized patient care, and the long-term viability of ERAS protocols.

Implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) program in neurosurgery

BACKGROUND

Over the past decade, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) guidelines have been proven to simplify postoperative care and improve recovery in several surgical disciplines. The authors set out to create and launch an ERAS® program for cranial neurosurgery that meets official ERAS® Society standards. The authors summarize the successive steps taken to achieve this goal in two specific neurosurgical conditions and describe the challenges they faced.

METHODS

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (Pit-NET) resected by a transsphenoidal approach and craniosynostosis (Cs) repair were selected as appropriate targets for the implementation of ERAS® program in the Department of Neurosurgery. A multidisciplinary team with experience in managing these pathologies was created. A specialized ERAS® nurse coordinator was hired. An ERAS® certification process was performed involving 4 seminars separated by 3 active phases under the supervision of an ERAS® coach.

RESULTS

The ERAS® Pit-NET team included 8 active members. The ERAS® Cs team included 12 active members. Through the ERAS® certification process, areas for improvement were identified, local protocols were written, and the ERAS® program was implemented. Patient-centered strategies were developed to increase compliance with the ERAS® protocols. A prospective database was designed for ongoing program evaluation. Certification was achieved in 18 months. Direct costs and time requirements are reported.

CONCLUSION

Successful ERAS® certification requires a committed multidisciplinary team, an ERAS® coach, and a dedicated nurse coordinator.

Effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery on the Prognosis of Patients With Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Hip fractures, predominantly occurring in the elderly, are a significant public health concern due to associated morbidity, disability, and mortality. Prolonged bed rest following the fracture often leads to complications, further threatening patient health. Enhanced recovery after surgery, a modern approach to postoperative care, is being explored for its potential to improve outcomes and quality of life in hip fracture patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery on hip fracture patients.

METHODS

In this systematic review, we addressed the PICO question: Does the enhanced recovery after surgery program reduce 1-year mortality, readmissions, and postoperative pain and improve Harris Hip Score compared with traditional care in elderly hip fracture patients? We searched key databases and gray literature and analyzed outcomes through a meta-analysis using RevMan, Stata, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for quality assessment.

RESULTS

Nine studies involving 10,359 patients were included. Compared with the control group, the enhanced recovery after surgery group showed significant reduction in length of stay (mean difference [MD] = -2.00; 95% confidence interval [CI] [-2.87, -1.14]; p < .0001) and overall complication rate (risk ratio [RR] = 0.76; 95% CI [0.67, 0.85]; p < .0001), with a lower delirium rate (RR = 0.42; 95% CI [0.26, 0.68]; p = .004). No significant differences were observed in Harris Hip Score, pain score, 1-year mortality, readmission rate, or incidences of urinary tract infection, respiratory tract infection, and deep vein thrombosis.

CONCLUSION

Enhanced recovery after surgery is associated with reduced length of stay, complication rate, and delirium rate in hip fracture patients.