Detailed analysis of prognostic factors in primary esophageal small cell carcinoma

A novel risk stratification system for primary small-cell carcinoma of the esophagus: indication for prognostication and staging

Background

Primary small cell carcinoma of the oesophagus (PSCCE) is a gastrointestinal tumour of rare onset. The current study was to investigate the role of a novel risk stratification system (RSS) for PSCCE.

Methods

The study included patients with PSCCE attending any of five medical institutions in China in 2008-2021, four of which served as a training set (n = 422) for construction of the RSS while the other served as a separate cohort (n = 256) for validation of the model. The RSS was established based on covariates associated with overall survival (OS) with a two-sided P-value of < 0.05 in multivariable regression. Survival discrimination of RSS was assessed.

Results

In the training cohort, multivariate regression analysis revealed age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, and initial lymph node metastasis to be independent prognostic factors for OS in non-distant metastatic PESCC; concurrent hepatic metastasis was the only significant predictor of distant metastatic PESCC. Accordingly, the RSS was developed and could classify patients into four subgroups: low-risk localized disease (LLD, defined as non-distant metastasis PESCC without risk factors, n = 58); high-risk localized disease (HLD, defined as non-distant metastasis PESCC with ≥ 1 risk factor, n = 199); low-risk metastatic disease (LMD, defined as metastatic PESCC without concomitant liver metastases, n = 103); and high-risk metastatic disease (HMD, definded as metastatic disease with synchronous liver metastases, n = 63). Three-year OS rates were 52.5%, 29.5%, 14.4%, and 5.7% for LLD, HLD, LMD, and HMD, respectively. When compared with the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) system, RSS showed a consistently superior ability to predict OS in both the training and validation cohorts.

Conclusion

The RSS is a reliable stratification model that could be used to optimize treatment for PESCC.

Multimodality Therapy and Survival Outcomes in Resectable Primary Small Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Currently, optimal treatment strategy for resectable primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (PSmCCE) remains controversial. To address this, we conducted a multicenter study to evaluate treatment patterns and long-term survival of PSmCCE patients who underwent radical resection.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study included resected PSmCCE patients who received radical resection at seven high-volume cancer centers. Overall survival (OS) and median survival time (MST) were calculated by using a Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was utilized to assess differences. Multivariable Cox analysis was performed to identify independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 352 patients with resected PSmCCE were included. For PSmCCE with stage cT1-2N0M0, patients who received surgery plus adjuvant therapy showed better survival than those who received surgery alone (5-year OS rate: 32.8% vs. 19.2%, MST: 44.0 vs. 33.0 months, P = 0.035). Multivariable Cox survival analysis revealed an independent correlation between receiving surgery plus adjuvant therapy and improved OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.529; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.280-0.997; P = 0.049). For stage cT3N0M0/T1-3N1M0 PSmCCE, patients who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery had superior long-term survival compared with those who received surgery combined with adjuvant therapy and those who received surgery alone (5-year OS rate: 27.2% vs. 9.5% vs. 0%, MST: 36.0 vs. 24.0 vs. 20.0 months, P = 0.014). Multivariable Cox survival analysis showed that neoadjuvant therapy was independently associated with improved OS (HR 0.384, 95% CI 0.203-0.728; HR 0.550, 95% CI 0.312-0.968; P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant therapy was associated with improved survival in stage cT1-2N0M0 PSmCCE, but this should be confirmed in prospective studies. For stage cT3N0M0/T1-3N1M0 cases, neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery should be considered.

Small cell carcinoma esophagus-A tertiary cancer center experience of a rare variant

BACKGROUND

Esophageal cancer is quite prevalent worldwide and usually carries a poor prognosis. Histologically, although squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma predominate, small cell carcinoma (SmCC) cases have been reported. Overall, there is a paucity of literature regarding this variant. In this article, we aim to highlight this uncommon entity of carcinoma esophagus and share our experience of SmCC patients seen over a decade at our institute.

METHOD

Records of patients with SmCC histology from 2010 to 2020 were assessed. Patients' demographic characteristics, clinical characteristics, treatment received, and outcomes were taken into consideration. Results were analyzed statistically using SPSS version 22.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients (nine males and five females) with a median age of 57 years (range: 35 - 72 years) were analyzed. The majority of the patients 10/14 (71.4%) received palliative radiotherapy of either 30Gy/10 fractions or 35Gy/15 fractions. Only 1/14 (7.14%) patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT). Overall, partial response was noted in all 11 patients (78.6%) who received treatment. The average median survival was 5 months (range: 1-11 months).

CONCLUSION

Although the small sample size of the study prevents us from drawing a firm conclusion, we propose national and international collaborative prospective studies for framing definitive oncologic management strategies for this rare histological variant of esophageal cancer.

Radiotherapy in the management of rare gastrointestinal cancers: A systematic review

The aim of this analysis is to assess radiotherapy's role and technical aspects in an array of rare gastrointestinal (GI) cancers for adult patients. Collection data pertaining to radiotherapy and digestive rare cancers were sourced from Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy improved outcomes for patients with esophageal undifferentiated carcinoma compared with esophageal salivary gland types of carcinomas. For rare gastric epithelial carcinoma, perioperative chemotherapy is the common treatment. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy showed no benefice compared with adjuvant chemotherapy for duodenal adenocarcinoma. Small bowel sarcomas respond well to radiotherapy. By analogy to anal squamous cell carcinoma, exclusive chemoradiotherapy provided better outcomes for patients with rectal squamous cell carcinoma. For anal adenocarcinoma, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, followed by radical surgery, was the most effective regimen. For pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, chemoradiotherapy can be a suitable option as postoperative or exclusive for unresectable/borderline disease. The stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a promising approach for hepatobiliary malignancy. Radiotherapy is a valuable option in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) for palliative intent, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) resistant disease, and unresectable or residual disease. Involved field (IF) radiotherapy for digestive lymphoma provides good results, especially for gastric extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (MALT). In conclusion, radiotherapy is not an uncommon indication in this context. A multidisciplinary approach is needed for better management of digestive rare cancers.

Clinicopathological features, treatment modalities, and prognosis of esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma: A single-center retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

Esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (ENEC) is a rare cancer that is highly malignant and related to a poor prognosis. In this retrospective study we aimed to elucidate the clinical characteristics, diagnosis and management of patients with ENEC and to evaluate the potential prognostic factors.

METHODS

Altogether 82 patients diagnosed with ENEC between January 2009 and December 2020 at the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center were retrospectively enrolled. Patients' survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. Univariate and multivariate analyses and a Cox regression model were used to identify the prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The median overall survival (mOS) was 13 months in all patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that advanced tumor stage (hazard ratio [HR] 2.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-6.66, P = 0.0353), liver (HR 3.36, 95% CI 1.53-7.41, P = 0.0026) and lung metastasis (HR 3.37, 95% CI 1.20-9.51, P = 0.0214) were associated with a poor prognosis. While positive chromogranin A (CgA) expression was related to a favorable outcome (HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.09-0.49, P < 0.001). Also, patients had adjustment of chemotherapy (dose reduction or less than three cycles) were prone to a worse prognosis compared with those did not (HR 4.36, 95% CI 2.10-9.08, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In patients with ENEC, advanced cancer stage, adjustment of chemotherapy, liver and lung metastasis were associated with a poor survival, while CgA expression was related to a favorable prognosis.

Limited-stage small cell carcinoma of the esophagus treated with curative esophagectomy: A multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of surgery in the treatment of small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) and explore potential prognostic factors.

METHODS

We screened patients with SCCE who underwent esophagectomy from 2010 to 2018 at three institutes. Differences in survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. The prognostic factors were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 69 patients were included. Multivariate analysis showed that TNM stage (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.57-10.75, p = 0.004) and adjuvant therapy (HR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.16-0.51, p < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors. Stage I, stage IIA, and stage IIB disease were merged into the surgery response disease (SRD), whereas stage III disease into the surgery nonresponse disease (SNRD). The SRD group had significantly improved survival compared to the SNRD group (HR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.19-0.58, p < 0.001). In addition, adjuvant therapy increased survival benefit in the SNRD group (p < 0.001) but not in the SRD group (p = 0.061).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery alone appears to be adequate for disease control in the SRD group, whereas multimodality therapy was associated with improved survival in the SNRD group.

The Survival and Prognosis Characteristics of Primary Esophageal Small-Cell Carcinoma

Objective

To comprehensively explore the survival characteristics of primary esophageal small-cell carcinoma (PSCCE) and identify the main factors affecting the prognosis.

Methods

The clinical and follow-up data of PSCCE patients admitted to the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from 2006 to 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was five-year survival. Survival curves were drawn using the Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank test was used to compare the differences in survival rates among the groups. Cox regression models were used to analyze prognostic factors.

Results

A total of 119 eligible patients were retrieved. Median survival was 27 months (3-100 months). Changes in overall survival (OS) in PSCCE patients were associated with TNM stage (P = 0.007), T stage (P = 0.049), and lymph node metastasis (P = 0.004). When TNM was in stage I-IIb, lymph node metastasis (P = 0.003) or combined adjuvant therapy (P = 0.004) was an independent factor affecting OS. Survival analysis showed that TNM staging had no predictive value for 5-year survival time or disease-free survival (DFS) of PSCCE (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

TNM stage, T stage, and lymph node metastasis were related to the survival of patients. Negative lymph node metastasis and treatment are independent prognostic factors in PSCCE TNM stage I-IIb patients.

Clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, and survival trends in esophageal neuroendocrine carcinomas: A population-based study

BACKGROUND

Esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (ENEC) is an extremely rare type of malignancy. Clinical data of ENEC are limited to case reports and case series. More information is needed on its clinical feature, management, and prognosis.

METHODS

This study collected information of ENEC patients diagnosed pathologically from 2010 to 2018. Data including demographic information, clinical features, and survival trends were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Statistical analyses were performed with STATA/SE 15.1, SPSS 25.0, and GraphPad Prism 8.

RESULTS

A total of 283 ENEC patients were included in this study. The small-cell and large-cell subtypes of ENEC possess similar clinical features. The lower third of the esophagus (58%) was the most common location of ENEC. At the time of diagnosis, most ENEC patients were AJCC 7th stage IV (48.1%). Metastasis occurred in more than half of the ENEC patients (53.4%), and the most common metastatic site was the liver (37.1%). Compared with poorly differentiated esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), another aggressive malignancy of the esophagus sometimes confused with ENEC because of similar histological features, our study showed differences in tumor location and metastatic rate, but similar poor survival rates. Multivariate survival analysis showed that ENEC located at the middle third of esophagus (p = 0.013), "Brain metastasis" (p = 0.019), and "Liver metastasis" (p < 0.001) were independent predictors of worse outcomes. "Surgery" (p = 0.003), and "Chemotherapy" (p < 0.001) were associated with better survival.

CONCLUSION

A significant proportion of patients with newly diagnosed ENEC presented with metastatic disease. Predictors of poor survival included tumor location, brain metastasis, and liver metastasis. ENEC and poorly differentiated ESCC share certain histological features, but differ in tumor location and metastatic rate. Yet, no standard treatment strategy has been established, but surgery and chemotherapy were related to better outcomes.

Preoperative chemotherapy for limited-stage small cell carcinoma of the esophagus

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment approach for limited-stage small cell carcinoma of the esophagus remains uncertain, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative chemotherapy plus surgery versus upfront surgery in those patients.

METHODS

From June 2001 to June 2015, a total of 280 patients with limited-stage small cell carcinoma of the esophagus were screened from 60 131 esophageal cancer patients. The outcome analysis of those patients who receiving preoperative chemotherapy plus surgery or upfront surgery were conducted. The primary endpoint was overall survival and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and safety.

RESULTS

Out of the 280 patients, 200 were men (71.4%), the median age was 64 years (range,42-75 years), 171 patients (61.1%) patients received preoperative chemotherapy plus surgery, and 109 patients (38.9%) underwent upfront surgery. A pathologic complete response rate of 8.8% was noted in patients who received preoperative chemotherapy. Compared to the upfront surgery group, the preoperative chemotherapy group had a better median overall survival (26.0 months vs. 19.5 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.92; P = 0.011) and a prolonged progression-free survival (16.0 months vs. 13.0 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.99; P = 0.039). Postoperative complications and peritreatment mortality were comparable between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to upfront surgery, preoperative chemotherapy plus surgery improves overall survival in patients with limited-stage small cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

Nomogram for the prediction of individualized overall survival of patients diagnosed with small cell esophageal carcinoma

Background

A nomogram was developed for the estimation of individualized overall survival (OS) of patients diagnosed with small cell esophageal carcinoma (SCEC).

Methods

From the SEER dataset, 427 patients diagnosed with SCEC during the period from 2004 to 2015 were selected as training sets. For the establishment of a nomogram capable of estimating the OS possibility of patients diagnosed with SCEC, a group of independent prognostic factors were identified and incorporated. The effectiveness of the nomogram was then both externally and internally verified among 159 patients from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) who were diagnosed with SCEC between 2006 and 2015. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomogram were measured by concordance index (C-index). Comparisons between nomogram and the AJCC staging systems (6th and 7th) were performed with calibration plots and area under the curves (AUC) values.

Results

We identified age, gender, primary site, SEER stage, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy as seven independent risk factors which were then used to set up the nomogram. Calibration curves indicated that the prediction of the nomogram was consistent with real observations for the possibilities of 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS, and applying the nomogram to the cohort for validation led to reproducible results. Moreover, the C-indices and AUC values were higher in the nomogram than those in the AJCC staging system AJCC which is also aimed at the prediction of OS.

Conclusions

This study resulted in the establishment of the first nomogram for the prediction of individualized OS of patients diagnosed with SCEC. The accuracy rate of prediction of this model may be higher than previously established staging systems.

A Comparative Analysis of the Gene Expression Profiles of Small Cell Esophageal Carcinoma, Small Cell Lung Cancer, and Esophageal Adeno/Squamous Carcinoma

Purpose/objectives: Primary small cell esophageal carcinoma (SCEC) is a rare malignancy without an established treatment strategy. This study investigated the gene expression profile of SCEC and compared it with the expression profiles of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and esophageal adeno/squamous carcinoma (EAC/ESCC). Materials/methods: All patients with SCEC, SCLC, and EAC/ESCC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database 1973-2014 were included. Overall survival (OS) and prognostic analysis were conducted. De novo expression array analysis was performed on three pairs of frozen primary SCEC tissues and the corresponding normal samples from the institutional tissue bank using the Affymetrix HG U133 plus 2.0 Array. These data were complemented with public domain expression data sets from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository using the same working platforms, which included primary SCLC, EAC/ESCC, and normal lung/esophagus specimens (series GSE30219 and GSE26886). After individual normalization, the primary tumors were submitted to statistical analysis (GeneSpring GX 13.0) to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) relative to their paired normal tissues. Enrichments of genes categorized by function and gene interactions were analyzed by DAVID 6.8 and STRING 11.0, respectively. Results: The clinical outcomes of the patients with SCEC were significantly more worse than those with EAC/ESCC and SCLC in the SEER database. SCEC had more DEGs in common with SCLC than EAC/ESCC [829 vs. 450; false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.01; and fold change ≥2], leading to a stronger correlation between SCEC and SCLC (Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.60 for SCEC vs. SCLC, 0.51 or 0.45 for SCEC vs. ESCC or EAC, and the coefficient was 0.73 for ESCC vs. EAC). Similar findings were obtained by principal component analysis (PCA) using all DEGs retrieved from these four groups. Functional annotation showed that a higher proportion of pathways and biological processes were common between SCEC and SCLC and were associated with the cell cycle (mitosis), DNA replication, telomere maintenance, DNA repair, and P53 and RB pathways (Benjamini p < 0.05). Compared with EAC/ESCC, SCEC shared more co-upregulated DEGs coding for the aforementioned common pathways with SCLC (584 vs. 155). In addition, SCEC and SCLC were found to have possessed overlapping gene-interactive networks, with centromere protein F (CENPF), never in mitosis gene A-related kinase 2 ( NEK2), kinesin family member 11 (KIF11), thymopoietin (TMPO), and forkhead box protein M1 (FOXM1) as common skeletons centered by gene regulatory network (NUF2). Conclusions: This study is the first attempt to examine the genomic signatures of SCEC at the transcriptomic level and compare the expression profiles between SCEC, SCLC, and EAC/ESCC. Our preliminary data indicate that SCEC and SCLC display notably similar patterns of gene expression for mitosis and DNA repair. Further validation studies are warranted.

A Retrospective Study of 52 Patients With Primary Small Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus Treated With Radical Surgery

Background:

Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) is a rare and extremely fatal disease. We aim to evaluate the efficacy of radical surgery for resectable SCCE and to explore potential prognostic factors.

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed 52 consecutive SCCE patients who underwent radical surgery from February 1993 to November 2014 at a single institution. The Kaplan-Meier estimator with log-rank test was used to assess overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and median survival time. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to evaluate prognostic factors through Cox proportional hazard regression model.

Results:

Twenty-five (48.1%) patients were treated with surgery alone, whereas 27 (51.9%) patients underwent adjuvant therapy after surgery. The median OS time was 17.4 months (95% CI: 13.5-21.3). The median DFS time was 13.4 months (95% CI: 7.7-19.0). Patients whose tumors were located in the lower part of thoracic esophagus and the esophagogastric junction showed significantly better OS (27.0 vs. 13.2 months, P = 0.016) and DFS (27.0 vs. 11.3 months, P = 0.017) than those located in the upper and middle parts. Patients with N0 status experienced significantly better OS (21.4 vs. 11.6 months, P = 0.012) and DFS (21.4 vs. 8.6 months, P = 0.012) than those with N+ status. Patients whose tumor lengths were shorter than 5 cm had a better OS (17.4 vs. 5.7 months, P = 0.035) than those longer than 5 cm. Patients who underwent chemotherapy experienced a significantly improved OS (21.0 vs. 14.1 months, P = 0.032) compared to surgery alone. Multivariable analysis showed that lower tumor location, shorter tumor length, pN0 status and chemotherapy independently predicted better OS; lower tumor location and pN0 status independently predicted better DFS.

Conclusions:

Radical surgery in combination with chemotherapy has better outcomes than surgery alone for resectable SCCE. Higher tumor location, longer tumor length, lymph node metastasis and not undergoing chemotherapy independently predict worse prognoses.

Survival outcomes and prognostic factors of primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus

Background

Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (PSCCE) is a rare and aggressive malignancy. It has a poor survival rate, and there is no consensus as to a standard therapeutic modality. In this study, we aimed to investigate the prognostic factors and evaluate the outcomes of patients with PSCCE who had been treated with different therapeutic methods.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 113 consecutive patients with PSCCE who received treatment at our center from 2003 to 2016. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The Cox regression model was used to analyze the prognostic factors. The survival analysis was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods.

Results

The 12- and 36-month OS rates of all 113 enrolled patients were 45% and 12%, respectively. A significantly prolonged OS rate was associated with lymph node stages N0–N1 (P=0.022), the Veterans’ Administration Lung Study Group (VALSG) system limited-disease (LD) staging (P=0.040), and multimodality treatments (P=0.047). Patients with regional lymph node metastasis benefited more from surgery combined with chemotherapy than surgery or chemotherapy alone (P=0.046). Concerning chemotherapy, cisplatin plus etoposide was the regimen most commonly used to treat PSCCE patients (67.5%).

Conclusions

An early lymph node stage, the VALSG LD staging, and multimodality treatments were identified as independent prognostic factors of PSCCE. Surgery combined with adjuvant chemotherapy was especially necessary for LD stage PSCCE patients with lymph node stages N1–3.

Endoscopic diagnosis of early-stage primary esophageal small cell carcinoma: Report of two cases

BACKGROUND

Primary esophageal small cell carcinoma (PESCC) is a highly aggressive malignancy, and its detailed clinical behaviors have remained virtually unknown. Because of the rapid tumor progression, the diagnosis of esophageal small cell carcinoma at early stage is extremely difficult in clinical practice. Currently, only a handful of PESCC cases have been reported.

CASE SUMMARY

Case 1: A 62-year-old man was diagnosed with an esophageal submucosal tumor by endoscopy. Endoscopic ultrasonography showed a 0.8 cm low echo nodule in the muscularis mucosa. As the patient refused to undergo endoscopic resection, neoplasia was detected by endoscopy 1 year later. Case 2: A 68-year-old woman was diagnosed as having an esophageal submucosal tumor by endoscopy at a local hospital. About 2 wk later, we performed endoscopic ultrasonography and found a 1 cm low echo nodule in the muscularis mucosa; the submucosal was thinner than normal but still continuous; mucosal hyperemia and erosion were found on the surface of the tumor. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was performed and the histopathological finding showed a small cell carcinoma invading the submucosal layer.

CONCLUSION

Early esophageal small cell carcinoma shows submucosal infiltrating growth with a hypoechoic mass in the muscularis mucosa as diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasonography. It is easily misdiagnosed as submucosal masses. Endoscopic manifestations should be identified and pathological biopsies should be employed. ESD may be performed to provide an opportunity for early treatment of PESCC.

Nationwide survey of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus: a multicenter study conducted among institutions accredited by the Japan Esophageal Society

BACKGROUND

Esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (ENEC) is an extremely rare type of tumor characterized by a high malignant potential, rapid growth, and poor prognosis. Because the standard therapy for ENEC has been poorly defined, we herein aimed to attain a clear view of the current state of treatment for ENEC by performing a large-scale, multicenter study.

METHODS

We conducted a questionnaire-based, retrospective clinical review of 142 patients with ENEC treated at 37 hospitals accredited by the Japan Esophageal Society from January 2010 to December 2015.

RESULTS

The most frequent main treatment performed was an operation, followed by chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy, and endoscopic submucosal dissection. Among the 67 patients who underwent surgery, 28 (19.7%) were not accurately diagnosed with NEC or a combined NEC tumor by pretreatment biopsy. The 5-year overall survival rate of all patients was 33.2%. Among patients with Stages III and IV disease, the prognosis was significantly better in patients who underwent chemoradiotherapy than in patients who underwent other treatments. Among patients with Stages I and II disease, however, there was no difference in survival rates between those who underwent surgery and chemoradiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This nationwide survey is a valuable report of the current status of treatment of ENEC in a limited number of cases experienced at each participating institution. The survival benefit obtained from surgery was considered to be limited, especially for Stages III and IV ENEC. Accurate pretreatment histological diagnosis is essential to determine the most appropriate treatment strategy for patients with ENEC.

Apatinib Combined with Irinotecan in the Treatment of Advanced Small-Cell Esophageal Carcinoma: A Case Report

Chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for advanced small cell esophageal carcinoma (SCEC) characterized by poor prognosis. Preclinical studies demonstrated that apatinib has the potential to enhance the efficacy of conventional chemotherapeutic drugs and reverse multidrug resistance (MDR). This report described the application of apatinib combined with irinotecan as the third-line treatment for advanced SCEC in a 54-year-old male patient. His symptoms of upper abdominal pain and distension were ameliorated notably after the combination therapy. Computed tomography (CT) examination revealed the treatment efficacy was partial response (PR). The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 12.5 months and 28 months, respectively. The treatment-related toxicity was manageable. Apatinib combined with chemotherapy may serve as a new treatment choice for advanced SCEC patients. However, further studies should be conducted to confirm the therapeutic value of this combination regimen in advanced SCEC.

Chemotherapy Plus Radiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy in Patients With Small Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus: A SEER Database Analysis

BACKGROUND

Small cell carcinoma of the esophagus is a rare malignant tumor. We aimed to explore the chemotherapeutic efficacy on the prognosis of patients with small cell carcinoma of the esophagus who received radiotherapy.

METHODS

To identify the population of interest, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data from 1996 to 2016 were chosen. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to probe into prognosis factors. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was conducted to identify factors related to overall survival and cancer-specific survival.

RESULTS

Overall, data from 162 patients were analyzed in this study. Tumor size (P = 0.014), T staging (P = 0.028), and chemotherapy (P < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors affecting overall survival. Patients with regional disease (hazard ratio = 5.435, P < 0.001) and distant metastasis (hazard ratio = 2.183, P < 0.001) who received radiotherapy alone had worse survival than those receiving chemoradiotherapy. Tumor size (P = 0.004) and chemotherapy (P < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors affecting cancer-specific survival. Tumor size was an independent factor affecting cancer-specific survival for patients receiving chemoradiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Age, T staging, tumor size, primary site, and chemotherapy are independent prognosis factors affecting overall survival and cancer-specific survival in patients with small cell carcinoma of the esophagus who receive radiotherapy. Chemotherapy might further improve cancer-specific survival in patients with small cell carcinoma of the esophagus receiving radiotherapy at all stages.

Systematic analysis of the transcriptome in small-cell carcinoma of the oesophagus reveals its immune microenvironment

Objectives

Although the genomic landscape of small-cell carcinoma of the oesophagus (SCCE) has been dissected, its transcriptome-level aberration and immune microenvironment status are unknown.

Methods

Using ultra-deep whole transcriptome sequencing, we analysed the expression profile of nine paired SCCE samples and compared the transcriptome with public transcriptomic data set of normal oesophageal mucosa and other cancer types. Based on the transcriptome data, the immune signatures were investigated. The genomic data of 55 SCCE samples were also applied for immune checkpoint blockade therapy (ICBT) biomarker evaluation including microsatellite instability (MSI) status, tumor mutation burden (TMB) and neoantigen burden (TNB). Also, we evaluated the CD8, CD68 and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in 62 retrospective SCCE samples with IHC assay.

Results

Differential expression analysis revealed that the cell cycle, p53, and Wnt pathways are significantly deregulated in SCCE. Immune microenvironment analysis showed that high leucocyte infiltration and adaptive immune resistance did occur in certain individuals, while the majority showed a relatively suppressive immune status. Immune checkpoints such as CD276 and LAG-3 were upregulated, and higher M2 macrophage infiltration in tumor tissues. Furthermore, normal tissues adjacent to the tumors of SCCE presented a more activated inflammatory status than tumor-free healthy controls. These observations showed that ICBT might benefit SCCE patients. As the critical biomarker of ICBT, TMB of SCCE was 3.64 with the predictive objective response rate 13.2%, while the PD-L1-positive rate was 43%.

Conclusions

Our study systematically characterized the immune microenvironment in small-cell carcinoma of the esophagus and provided evidence that several patients with SCCE may benefit from immune checkpoint blockade therapy.

Incidence, treatment, and survival analysis in esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma population

BACKGROUND

As a subtype of esophageal neuroendocrine neoplasms (ENENs), esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (ENEC) is rare. ENEC can be poorly differentiated and highly aggressive. This study aims to illustrate the incidence, treatment, and prognosis of ENEC by using a population-based database.

METHODS

We collected clinicopathological data [1975-2016] of ENEC, esophageal adenocarcinoma (EACA), and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESqCC) from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, and analyzed their incidence, treatment, and prognosis.

RESULTS

A total of 60,238 cases were in our study cohort, including ENEC (n=686), EACA (n=26,575), and ESqCC (n=32,977). The incidence of ENEC in 2016 was 0.044 per 100,000 persons. The tumor grade of ENEC was significantly higher than that of EACA and ESqCC (P<0.001). Both cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) of ENEC were significantly worse than those of EACA and ESqCC (P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant improvement of CSS and OS by surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy (all P<0.001). Besides, compared with monotherapies, combinational therapies brought more benefits to both CSS and OS of patients with ENEC.

CONCLUSIONS

Our population-based evidence revealed that ENEC, as a rare cancer, had a worse prognosis, compared with EACA and ESqCC. Surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy can all improve the prognosis of ENEC patients. Combinational therapy can yield a better prognosis than monotherapy.

ApoB/ApoA-1 Ratio as a Novel Prognostic Predictor in Patients With Primary Small Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus

Background and Aim: Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) is a rarely aggressive disease characterized by rapid progression, widespread metastasis, and poor prognosis. This study was aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of serum lipids for overall survival (OS) in SCCE patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed SCCE patients in a training cohort (61 patients) and validated them in a validation cohort (27 patients). These cases were collected from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from 2006 to 2017. Univariate and multivariate Cox survival analyses were performed to determine serum lipids as prognostic factors associated with the patient's OS. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were used to compare predictive power of independent prognostic factors. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the prognostic factors were measured by the concordance index (C-index) and decision curve, and were compared with the TNM stage system. Results: On multivariate analysis of the training cohort, independent factors for survival were gender, BAR (ApoB/ApoA-1) and TNM stage. The area under the curve (AUC) of BAR+TNM stage in the training cohort was higher than that of TNM stage for OS, and similar result was observed in the validation cohort. The c-index of BAR+TNM stage for predicting the OS was 0.655 (95% CI = 0.571-0.740), which was higher than that of TNM stage [0.614 (95% CI = 0.530-0.698)] in the training cohort. In the validation cohort, the C-index of the BAR+TNM stage for predicting OS was also higher than that of the TNM stage [0.688 (95% CI: 0.570~0.806) vs. (0.512; 95% CI: 0.392~0.632)]. In addition, decision curve analysis also showed that the predictive accuracy of BAR+TNM stage for OS was higher than TNM stage both in the training and the validation cohorts. Conclusions: BAR represents a promising prognostic indicator that might complement TNM stage in the prognosis of SCCE, and that warrant further assessment in large SCCE patient cohort.

Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: progression in the last decade

Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (PSCCE) is a highly malignant tumor that is diagnosed by endoscopic biopsy and immunohistochemistry. Because of its low incidence, a high degree of malignancy, and rapid progress, it is difficult to conduct large, randomized controlled trials and to establish a standard treatment plan for this disease. In recent years, several retrospective studies have been reported, and with the rise of emerging therapies, PSCCE has gradually become a focus of thoracic surgery. This paper reviews progress in the diagnosis and treatment of PSCCE in recent years.

Small Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus: A Nationwide Analysis of Treatment and Outcome at Patient Level in Locoregional Disease

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background and Purpose:

Small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCEC) is a rare subtype of esophageal cancer for which optimal treatment is unknown. We analyzed the impact of treatment factors on outcome in patients with nonmetastasized SCEC.

Methods:

Patients with a histologically confirmed SCEC without distant metastases were analyzed in a nationwide multicenter retrospective cohort. All patients received radiotherapy as part of curative treatment between January 2000 and December 2014. Details on treatment and outcome were retrieved from individual charts. Cox regression analysis was used to determine prognostic factors for survival.

Results:

Fifty-eight patients were analyzed. Median survival was 16 months (95% confidence interval, 11-21 mo). Infield recurrences occurred in 25%, distant metastases in 45%, and brain metastases in 12%. In total, 63% of patients developed a recurrence. Most recurrences (67%) occurred within 1 year. In univariable analyses an increased number of chemotherapy cycles (>3) and lower radiotherapy doses (<45 Gy) were associated with improved survival. T-stage, N-stage, treatment period, type of chemotherapy, prophylactic cranial irradiation, and age were not associated with survival. In multivariable analyses, only the number of chemotherapy cycles was associated with better survival (hazard ratio, 0.78; P=0.006).

Conclusions:

SCEC recurs frequently at distant sites after definitive chemoradiotherapy and usually within 1 year after curative treatment. With a dose of 45 to 50 Gy, infield recurrence rate was low. We found a relationship between number of received chemotherapy cycles and survival with best results obtained after at least 4 cycles of chemotherapy.

Treatment strategies for neuroendocrine carcinoma of the upper digestive tract

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the esophagus and the stomach is aggressive. The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal therapeutic strategy.

METHODS

Both clinicopathological factors and treatment results were examined in 34 patients with immunohistochemically diagnosed NEC of the upper gastrointestinal tract (esophagus 22; stomach 12).

RESULTS

Twenty-nine tumors showed protruding and localized type, like submucosal tumor. Esophagectomy and gastrectomy were performed in six and eight patients, respectively. Among the six patients with esophageal NEC, three with node metastasis developed recurrence within seven months, while the other three (pT1bN0) had no recurrence. Regarding gastric NEC, three patients with pT3N1 or 2 tumor received adjuvant chemotherapy and achieved a 5-year survival. However, the other five experienced recurrence after gastrectomy. Systemic chemotherapy was performed as the main treatment for 18 patients with advanced NEC. The median survival was 10 months after initial chemotherapy. No marked differences in the response were recognized between the 14 cases with esophageal NEC and the 4 with gastric NEC. The median survival was 14.3 and 5.3 months for the 11 effective and 7 non-effective patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A macroscopically unique appearance, like submucosal tumor, suggests the possibility of NEC. Esophagectomy is an effective treatment option for limited-stage NEC without node metastasis, while gastrectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy may be effective for NEC even with node metastasis when R0 resection can be achieved. Systemic chemotherapy is relatively effective for advanced NEC, although early progression frequently develops.

S-1 plus apatinib followed by salvage esophagectomy for irinotecan-refractory small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: A case report and review of the literature

RATIONALE

Small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) is an uncommon but lethal disease characterized by dismal prognosis. Only 10% of advanced SCCE patients survive longer than 1 year. Resection is a choice for limited-stage cases, whereas the optimal treatment regimen for primary SCCE is yet to be elucidated. To the best of our knowledge, the efficacy of S-1 plus apatinib for irinotecan-refractory SCCE has not been reported before.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 61-year old, previously healthy male was admitted for dysphagia and fatigue. Endoscopic biopsy revealed a tumor in the middle third of the esophagus. Further exams including abdomen computed tomography excluded distant metastasis.

DIAGNOSES

Primary SCCE (pT1bN1M0, IIB) was established after salvage operation.

INTERVENTIONS

The tumor was enlarged after 1 cycle of first-line chemotherapy using irinotecan plus cisplatin, which indicated drug resistance. Second-line oral apatinib (425 mg daily) plus S-1 (60 mg, twice daily for 4 weeks with a 2-week drug-free interval) for a month showed efficacy, as shown by decreased serum neuron-specific enolase and stable of the esophageal lesion. Thereafter, salvage minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy and 2-field lymph node dissection was performed, followed by oral apatinib plus S-1 at the prior dosage for 6 months. In addition, maintenance therapy using low-dose apatinib (250 mg daily) plus S-1 (40 mg, twice daily for 4 weeks with a 2-week interval) were administered for another 6 months. Then the patient was followed up irregularly at the outpatient clinic.

OUTCOMES

The adverse events including hand-foot syndrome, hypertension, vomiting, leukopenia, impaired hepatic function, and fatigue were mainly tolerable. Forty months after the operation, he was readmitted for back pain and disseminated bone metastases appeared in magnetic resonance images. His progression-free survival could not be obtained precisely, and his overall survival was longer than 40 months up to September 2019.

LESSONS

S-1 plus apatinib followed by a timely esophagectomy with curative intent might be an alternative option for chemotherapy-refractory SCCE in selected patients. Better evidence is warranted.

A competing-risks nomogram and recursive partitioning analysis for cause-specific mortality in patients with esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma

The objective of this study is to estimate the probability of cause-specific mortality using a competing-risks nomogram and recursive partitioning analysis in a large population-based cohort of patients with esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma. The surveillance, epidemiology and end results database was used to identify 162 patients diagnosed with esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma from 1998 to 2014. We estimated a cumulative incidence function for cause-specific mortality. A nomogram was constructed by using a proportional subdistribution hazard model, validated using bootstrap cross-validation, and evaluated with a decision curve analysis to assess its clinical utility. Finally, we performed risk stratification using a recursive partitioning analysis to divide patients with esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma into clinically useful prognostic groups. Tumor location, distant metastasis, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were significantly associated with cause-specific mortality. The calibration plots demonstrated good concordance between the predicted and actual outcomes. The discrimination performance of a Fine-Gray model was evaluated by using the c-index, which was 0.723 for cause-specific mortality. The decision curve analysis ranged from 0.268 to 0.968 for the threshold probability at which the risk model provided net clinical benefits relative to hypothetical all-screening and no-screening scenarios. The risk groups stratified by a recursive partitioning analysis allowed significant distinction between cumulative incidence curves. We determined the probability of cause-specific mortality in patients with esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma and developed a nomogram and recursive partitioning analysis stratification system based on a competing-risks model. The nomogram and recursive partitioning analysis appear to be suitable for risk stratification of cause-specific mortality in patients with esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma and will help clinicians to identify patients at increased risk of cause-specific mortality to guide treatment and surveillance decisions.

Is There a Role for Surgery in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Esophagus? A Contemporary View from the NCDB

BACKGROUND

Esophageal neuroendocrine tumors (eNETs) are exceedingly rare, aggressive and have a poor prognosis. Treatment guidelines are ill-defined and mainly based on evidence from case reports and analogous experiences drawn from similar disease sites.

METHODS

The NCDB was reviewed for histologically confirmed stage I-III, primary eNETs from 2006 to 2014. Patients were grouped into whether or not they underwent primary tumor resection. Univariate, multivariable, and full bipartite propensity score (PS) adjusted Cox regression analyses were used to assess overall and relative survival differences.

RESULTS

A total of 250 patients were identified. Mean age was 65.0 (standard deviation [SD] 11.9) years, and 174 (69.6%) patients were male. Most patients had stage III disease (n = 136, 54.4%), and the most common type of NET was small cell eNET (n = 111, 44.4%). Chemotherapy was used in 186 (74.4%), radiation therapy in 178 (71.2%), and oncological resection was performed in 69 (27.6%) patients. Crude 2-year survival rates were higher in the operated (57.3%) compared with the nonoperated group (35.2%; p < 0.001). The survival benefit held true after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio [HR] 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.69, p < 0.001). After full bipartite PS adjustment analysis, survival was longer for patients who received a surgical resection compared with those who did not (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.31-0.75, p = 0.003) with a corresponding 2-year overall survival rate of 63.3% (95% CI 52.0-77.2) versus 38.8% (95% CI 30.9-48.8), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Multimodal treatment that includes surgery is associated with better overall survival for eNETs. Additional research is needed to more definitively identify patients who benefit from esophagectomy and to establish an appropriate treatment algorithm.

Lymph Node Metastasis and Recurrence in Primary Small Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus: A Retrospective Study of 125 Cases

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate and analyze the prognostic factors affecting lymph node (LN) metastasis and postoperative recurrence in patients with primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE). Methods: A total of 125 primary SCCE patients who received surgical resection in the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University between March 2005 and August 2009 were included in this retrospective study. All the potential prognostic variables, including the patients' characteristics, tumor features, and treatment modalities, were analyzed by a Cox regression model to explore LN metastasis and the factors associated with postoperative recurrence. Results: LN metastasis rate was significantly correlated with depth of tumor invasion (p < 0.001) and tumor length (p = 0.006). LN metastasis ratio was positively correlated with pathological type (p < 0.001), tumor location (p = 0.002), depth of tumor invasion (p < 0.001), and tumor length (p < 0.001). LN stage and chemotherapy were found to be the independent risk factors for progression-free survival (PFS). Conclusion: Depth of tumor invasion and tumor length were main factors associated with LN metastasis in primary SCCE. The stage of LN metastasis and chemotherapy was independent factors affecting the postoperative PFS.

A rare rarity: Neuroendocrine tumor of the esophagus

Esophageal Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare, aggressive and lacking specific symptoms. This causes a diagnostic delay, worsening the prognosis. Numerous cases are reported in literature, without a consensus on the management. Our aim was to clarify epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic, therapeutic management of esophageal NETs. Extensive literature search identified a total of 226 articles. One hundred twenty-five articles (n = 1676) met the inclusion criteria, showing that: the incidence of esophageal NET varies geographically; men (60-70 years) are more affected; smoking and alcohol abuse are the major risk factors; dysphagia, weight loss, appetite loss are the most common clinical features. The histotypes include high-grade small and large cell esophageal carcinomas and low-grade carcinoid tumors. Mixed neuroendocrine/non-neuroendocrine neoplasms are the most common. Often the diagnosis occurs randomly on endoscopic examination. Circulating markers, functional combined with conventional imaging contributes to the diagnosis and management. Treatment depends on type, grade and stage of the tumor.

Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: Comparison between a Chinese cohort and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data

Background

The optimal standard treatment for primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) remains undetermined. In this study, we conducted two areas of research on SCCE. First, we analyzed differences in SCCE characteristics between Chinese and U.S. patients. Second, we evaluated optimal treatment strategies for SCCE in the Chinese cohort.

Methods

Data from 137 Chinese SCCE patients collected from two cancer centers in China were compared with 385 SCCE patients registered in the U.S. SEER program. Prognostic factors were further analyzed in the Chinese group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline features between the groups.

Results

There were more Chinese SCCE patients with regional stage disease (41.6%) and surgery was the principal local therapy (78.1%), while 51.7% of U.S. patients was at advanced stages and tended to receive radiotherapy as the main therapy (45.2%). Median overall survival (MST) of Chinese patients was 15.0 months, compared with 8.0 months for U.S. patients (P < 0.001). However, the survival differences between groups disappeared after PSM (MST: 12.5 m vs 9.0 m, P = 0.144). Further analysis found that surgery tended to achieve clinical benefits only for patients with localized disease (T1‐4aN0M0). Radiotherapy and chemotherapy may prolong survival in patients with regional and extensive disease.

Conclusions

Although there are huge differences in the tumor characteristics and treatment modalities of SCCE between Chinese and U.S. patients, the prognosis of SCCE is equally poor in both. Surgery should be considered for patients with localized disease, while chemoradiotherapy is recommended for patients with regional and extensive disease.

The Role of Surgery in Treating Resectable Limited Disease of Esophageal Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is a rare malignant tumor. The role of surgery in resectable limited disease of esophageal NEC remains unclear. How to select a specific group of limited disease of esophageal NEC who might benefit from surgery remains to be answered.

METHODS

Patients undergoing esophagectomy for resectable limited disease of esophageal NEC in our department from January 2007 to June 2015 were analyzed. TNM staging system was applied to describe those patients, and according to their different long-term prognosis after surgery, those patients were subgrouped into surgery response limited disease (SRLD) group and surgery non-response limited disease (SNRLD) group. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to identify potential prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients with resectable limited disease of esophageal NEC were identified for analysis. The median survival time of those patients was 21.5 months. There was no significant survival differences among stage I, stage IIA, and stage IIB patients, but all these patients had significantly longer survival than stage III patients. Therefore, stage I, stage IIA, and stage IIB patients were aggregated together as SRLD group, and stage III patients were aggregated as SNRLD group. SRLD patients obtained significantly longer survival than SNRLD patients in both univariate analysis and multivariate analysis. Moreover, adjuvant therapy could significantly benefit SRLD patients (P = 0.004) but could not benefit SNRLD patients (P = 0.136).

CONCLUSIONS

Different responses to surgery existed in resectable limited disease of esophageal NEC indicating the need of further subgrouping for those patients. The resectable limited disease of esophageal NEC could be further subgrouped into SRLD group and SNRLD group according to the TNM staging system.

Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Esophagus: State of the Art in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management

INTRODUCTION

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms composed of cells containing dense-core neuroendocrine secretory granules in their cytoplasm. NETs of the esophagus are exceedingly uncommon, with a parallel absence of data published on clinical features, prognosis, and proposed treatment strategies.

METHODS

As relevant classification is not well-established, knowledge acquired in NETs of lung and gastrointestinal sites usually guides esophageal NET management. Associated subtypes are divided based upon shared neuroendocrine features into small and large cell NET, typical and atypical carcinoid.

RESULTS

Common presenting symptoms include dysphagia, abdominal discomfort, weight loss, melena, and on occasion, signs of carcinoid syndrome. Endoscopic findings describe a polypoid, nodular elevated lesion with an overlying surface depicted as mostly smooth and glistening. Disease metastasis is assessed using anatomical imaging, including computed tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), and positron emission tomography (PET)-CT. Prognosis is influenced by the extent of lymph node metastasis and potential lymphovascular invasion. Furthermore, proliferative activity, estimated using mitotic count or Ki-67 immunostaining, has been suggested as a significant prognostic parameter.

CONCLUSION

Therapeutic approach depends on clinical staging. Nevertheless, currently, a specific treatment algorithm for esophageal NETs has not been elucidated. Endoscopic resection has been proposed in NETs less than 1 cm in size with absence of regional lymph node metastasis, while surgical excision combined with adjuvant chemotherapy remains the treatment of choice.

Survival benefit of radiotherapy to patients with small cell esophagus carcinoma: an analysis of Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data

Background and Aims

Small cell esophageal carcinoma (SCEC) is a rare malignant tumor. So far, few studies are found to research the effect of radiotherapy (RT) to it. This study is designed to explore the prognostic factors, and analyze survival benefit of RT to patients with SCEC.

Results

Patients with SCEC were more likely to be in female, older, higher disease stage than those with non-small cell esophageal carcinoma. RT was used in more than 50% SCEC patients. RT tended be reduced as the disease stage raise in SCEC. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that age, year, disease stage, and RT were the prognostic factors of survival (P < 0.05). RT reduced nearly 75% risks of death in localized stage (P < 0.05), nearly 50% risks of death in regional stage (P > 0.05) and nearly 30% risks of death in distant stage (P > 0.05).

Methods

SCEC patients between 1973 and 2012 were searched from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data. Clinical factors including age, year, sex, race, stage, surgery, and RT were summarized. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to explore the independent prognostic factors of SCEC. Cox regression survival analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of RT to SCEC based on different stages.

Conclusions

Stage, age, year, and RT are independent prognostic factors of SCEC. Survival benefit of RT exists in any disease stage, but is only statistically significant in localized stage of SCEC.

Treatment Strategies and Prognostic Factors of Limited-Stage Primary Small Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus

INTRODUCTION

Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (PSCCE) is characterized by high malignancy, early metastasis, and poor prognosis. This retrospective study aimed to review the clinical characteristics of patients with limited-stage PSCCE and determine the relevant prognostic factors and optimal treatment strategies.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 152 consecutive patients with limited-stage PSCCE between January 2007 and December 2015. Prognostic factors were analyzed using univariate analysis and a Cox regression model. Subgroup analysis was applied to evaluate the effect of treatment strategy on survival.

RESULTS

Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that treatment modality (p = 0.034) and N stage (p = 0.002) were independent prognostic factors. Patients with stage I or IIA PSCCE who underwent an operation alone exhibited better survival than those who did not undergo an operation (median survival time 29 versus 17.4 months [p = 0.031]), and postoperative adjuvant therapy did not increase overall survival or disease-free survival (p > 0.05). The overall survival rate of patients with stage III PSCCE who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) was significantly better than that of patients who underwent an operation alone or did not undergo an operation (p = 0.021 and p = 0.026, respectively); additionally, nCT could increase disease-free survival (p = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment modalities and N stage are independent prognostic factors. Radical esophagectomy should be considered as the primary treatment for stage I or IIA PSCCE, and nCT followed by esophagectomy could be an effective treatment option for stage III PSCCE. Multicenter randomized studies are required to confirm the role of nCT in the management of limited-stage PSCCE.

High expression of Ki-67 is an independent favorable prognostic factor for esophageal small cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of Ki-67 expression in small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) has not been explored in any previous studies. Therefore, we conducted this retrospective study to investigate the prognostic role of Ki-67 in SCCE for the first time.

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients were included for analysis. The baseline clinicopathological data of these SCCE patients shared similar characteristics with previous studies. Ten patients were at stage I, 17 at stage II, and the remaining 17 were at stage III. Postoperatively, 23 patients received adjuvant therapy. Twenty-eight patients were found to have a high expression of Ki-67 (> 50%). After a median follow-up time of 54.8 months, the median survival time of those patients was 22.1 months. Early TNM stage, application of adjuvant therapy, and high expression of Ki-67 (Hazard Ratio = 0.314, 95% CI: 0.127-0.774; P = 0.012) were found to be favorable prognostic factors of patients with SCCE. In subgroup analysis, adjuvant therapy could only bring significant survival benefit for patients with high expression of Ki-67 (P = 0.008).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy for SCCE from January 2009 to January 2015 in our department were retrospectively analyzed. Data for analysis included demographic data, pathologic findings, tumor stage, adjuvant therapy, and survival time as well as Ki-67 index.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested that high expression of Ki-67 may not only serve as a favorable prognostic factor of SCCE but also an indication of providing adjuvant therapy for SCCE patients with surgical resection.

Primary neuroendocrine neoplasm of the esophagus - Report of 14 cases from a single institute and review of the literature

BACKGROUND:

Most prevalent esophageal neoplasm is squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Other tumors are uncommon and poorly studied. Primary neuroendocrine esophageal neoplasm is a rare carcinoma and most of its therapy management is based on lung neuroendocrine studies. Neuroendocrine tumors can be clustered in the following subtypes: high grade (small cell carcinoma or large cell carcinoma) and low grade (carcinoids).

OBJECTIVE:

The present study aims to assess clinical and pathological neuroendocrine esophageal tumors in a single oncologic center.

METHODS:

A retrospective analysis of patients and review of the literatures was performed.

RESULTS:

Fourteen patients were identified as neuroendocrine tumors, 11 male and 3 female patients. Mean age was 67.3 years old. Ten patients were classified as small cell, 3 as large cell and 1 as carcinoid. Four patients presented squamous cell carcinoma simultaneously and 1 also presented adenocarcinoma. Main sites of metastasis were liver, peritoneum, lung and bones. Most patients died before 2 years of follow-up. Patient with longer survival died at 35 months after diagnosis.

CONCLUSION:

Neuroendocrine esophageal tumors are rare; affect mainly men in their sixties or seventies. High grade tumors can be mixed to other subtypes neoplasms, such as adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Most of these patients have poor overall survival rates.

Treatment and survival outcomes of small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: an analysis of the National Cancer Data Base

Given the paucity of esophageal small cell carcinoma (SCC) cases, there are few large studies evaluating this disease. In this study, the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was utilized to analyze the clinical features, treatment, and survival of patients with esophageal SCC in a large, population-based dataset. We selected patients diagnosed with esophageal SCC from 1998 to 2011. Patients were identified as having no treatment, chemotherapy alone, radiation ± sequential chemotherapy, concurrent chemoradiation, and esophagectomy ± chemotherapy and/or radiation. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with OS. A total of 583 patients were identified. Most patients had stage IV disease (41.7%). Regarding treatment selection, chemoradiation was the most commonly utilized for patients with nonmetasatic disease, whereas chemotherapy alone was most common for metastatic patients. Esophagectomy (median survival 44.9 months with 3 year OS 50.5%) was associated with the best OS for patients with localized (node-negative) disease compared with chemotherapy alone (p < 0.001) or chemoradiation (p = 0.01). For locoregional (node-positive) disease, treatment with chemoradiation resulted in a median survival of 17.8 months and a 3 year OS 31.6%. On multivariate analysis, treatment with chemotherapy alone (p = 0.003) was associated with worse OS while esophagectomy (p = 0.04) was associated with improved OS compared to chemoradiation. Esophageal SCC is an aggressive malignancy with most patients presenting with metastatic disease. Either esophagectomy or chemoradiation as part of multimodality treatment appear to improve OS for selected patients with nonmetastatic disease.

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus: clinical characteristics and prognostic evaluation of 49 cases with surgical resection

BACKGROUND

The clinicopathological features and optimum treatment of esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) are hardly known due to its rarity. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study to analyze the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with surgically resected esophageal NEC.

METHODS

We collected clinicopathological data on consecutive limited disease stage esophageal NEC patients who underwent esophagectomy with regional lymphadenectomy in West China Hospital from January 2007 to December 2013.

RESULTS

A total of forty-nine patients were analyzed retrospectively. The mean age of the patients was 58.4±8.2 years with male predominance. Fifty-five percent of the esophageal NEC were located in the middle thoracic esophagus. Histologically, 28 (57.1%) patients were found to be small cell NECs. Fifty-one percent of the patients were found to have lymph node metastasis. According to the 2009 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, 9 patients were at stage I, 21 patients stage II, and 19 patients stage III. Twenty-six patients (53.1%) received adjuvant therapy. After a median follow-up of 44.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 35.2-50.4 months], the median survival time of the patients was 22.4 months (95% CI, 14.0-30.8 months). The 1-year and 3-year survival rates for the whole cohort patients were 74.9% and 35.3%, respectively. In univariate analysis, TNM staging, lymph node metastasis and adjutant therapy significantly influenced survival time. In multivariate analysis, TNM staging was the only independent prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal NEC has a poor prognosis. The 2009 AJCC TNM staging system for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma may also fit for esophageal NEC. Surgery combined with adjuvant therapy may be a good option for treating limited disease stage esophageal NEC. Further prospective studies defining the optimum therapeutic regimen for esophageal NEC are needed.

Management of treatment-naïve limited-stage small cell esophagus carcinoma

Objectives:

To identify the problems and principles of treatment decisions in treatment-naïve limited-stage small cell esophagus carcinoma (LD-SCEC).

Methods:

Clinical data from 39 patients with LD-SCEC treated in the Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China between 2000 and 2013 were retrospectively collected with regard to pathologic characteristics, overall survival (OS), and relevant prognostic factors.

Results:

The median OS was 21.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.4-29.7 months). The one-year OS was 76%, 3-year was 25%, and the 5-year OS was 8%. Depth of invasion, lymph metastasis status, and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors. Of the 39 cases, only 38.4% (15 cases) were diagnosed as SCEC by the biopsy specimen. Eight of the 15 patients (group A) received chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, while the remaining 7 patients (group B) and the other 24 patients (group C) received surgery as initial treatment. The one-year survival of group A was 87%, of group B was 69%, and of group C was 74% (p=0.037). The accuracy of the biopsy diagnosis influenced the treatment decisions and prognosis.

Conclusion:

Small cell esophagus carcinoma is a systemic disease, with depth of invasion, lymph metastasis status, and chemotherapy as independent prognostic factors. Systemic therapy based on chemotherapy is recommended. The top priority is to improve the accuracy of diagnosis before deciding on the initial treatment option.

Small Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus: Clinicopathological Features and Outcome of 22 Cases

BACKGROUND

Small cell esophageal carcinoma (SCEC) is a highly aggressive and rare neoplasm.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to report the characteristics, prognostic factors, and treatment outcomes of 22 patients with SCEC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This brief report was carried out by reviewing the medical records of 22 patients with newly histologically proven SCEC that were treated between 2000 and 2010 at 2 tertiary academic hospitals. All the potential prognostic variables, including the patients' characteristics, tumor features, and treatment modalities were analyzed to establish their influence on the patients' survival rates.

RESULTS

This study was conducted on 7 males and 15 females with a median age of 61 years. Dysphagia and weight loss were the most prevalent symptoms. According to the results, 14 patients (64%) had limited diseases and 8 cases (36%) had extensive diseases. In those with extensive diseases, liver, lung, and lymph nodes (LNs) were the most metastatic sites. Besides, most tumors were located in lower (50%) and middle (32%) part of the esophagus. Most patients (91%) were treated with sequential (55%) or concurrent (36%) chemoradiation (CRT). Surgical resection was also performed for 7 patients. Chemotherapy regimen consisted of cisplatin and etoposide in 14 patients (64%). The median follow up time was 12 months. The 1, 3, and 5-year overall survival rates were 27%, 14%, and 4%, respectively. Yet, no prognostic factors were found because of the small sample size of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary SCEC is a rare and highly aggressive tumor. However, prognosis is poor and long-term survival is exceptional. CRT could be an appropriate alternative to operation.

Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Gastroenteropancreatic System: A Comprehensive Review

To date, empirical literature has generally been considered lacking in relation to neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), the highly malignant subgroup of neuroendocrine neoplasms. NECs are often found in the lungs or the gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) system and can be of small or large cell type. Concentrating on GEP-NECs, we can conclude that survival times are poor, with a median of only 4–16 months depending on disease stage and primary site. Further, this aggressive disease appears to be on the rise, with incidence numbers increasing while survival times are stagnant. Treatment strategies concerning surgery are often undecided and second-line chemotherapy is not yet established. After an analysis of over 2600 articles, we can conclude that there is indeed more empirical literature concerning GEP-NECs available than previously assumed. This unique review is based on 333 selected articles and contains detailed information concerning all aspects of GEP-NECs. Namely, the classification, histology, genetic abnormalities, epidemiology, origin, biochemistry, imaging, treatment and survival of GEP-NECs are described. Also, organ-specific summaries with more detail in relation to disease presentation, diagnosis, treatment and survival are presented. Finally, key points are discussed with directions for future research priorities.