Use of carbon stable isotopes to monitor biostimulation and electron donor fate in chromium-contaminated groundwater

Biostimulation effect of different amendments on Cr(VI) recovering microbial community

The present study used Cr(VI)-polluted microcosms amended with lactate or yeast extract, and nonamended microcosms as control, to investigate how a native bacterial community varied in response to the treatment and during the pollutant removal. Results suggested that providing electron donors resulted in a proliferation of a few bacterial species, with the consequent decrease in observed species richness and evenness, and was a driving force for the bacterial compositional shift. Lactate promoted, in the first instance, the enrichment of fermentative bacteria belonging to Chromobacteriaceae, including Paludibacterium, and Micrococcaceae as observed after 4 days. When the rate of Cr(VI) removal was maximum in microcosms amended with lactate, the most represented taxa were Pseudarcicella and Azospirillum. Using yeast extract as a carbon source and electron donor led instead to the significant enrichment of Shewanella, followed by Vogesella and Acinetobacter on the 4th day, corresponding to 90% of Cr(VI) removed from the system. After the complete Cr(VI) removal, achieved in 7 days in the presence of yeast extract, α-diversity was notably increased. The amendment-specific turnover of the enriched bacterial taxa resulted in a different kinetic of pollutant removal. In particular, yeast extract promoted the quickest Cr(VI) reduction, while lactate supported a slower, but also considerable, pollutant removal from water. Since it is reasonable to assume that a macroscopic effect, such as the observed Cr(VI) removal, involved the overrepresented taxa, deepening the knowledge of the native bacterial community and its changes were used to hypothesize the possible microbial pathways involved.

Study on the effect of Cr(VI) removal by stimulating indigenous microorganisms using molasses

Molasses have a prominent effect on the bioremediation of Cr(VI) contaminated groundwater. However, its reaction mechanism is not detailed. In this paper, the removal of Cr(VI) with different carbon sources was compared to explore the effect and mechanism of the molasses. The addition of molasses can completely remove 25 mg/L Cr(VI), while the removal efficiency by glucose or emulsified vegetable oil was only 20%. Molasses could rapidly stimulate the reduction of Cr(VI) by indigenous microorganisms and weakened the toxicity on bacteria. The average removal rate of Cr(VI) was 0.42 mg/L·h, 10 times that of glucose system. Compared with glucose, molasses can remediate Cr(VI) at a higher concentration (50 mg/L), and the carbohydrate acted as microbial nutrients. Direct and indirect reduction acted together, the Fe(II) content in the aquifer medium increased from 1.7% to 4.7%. The addition of molasses extract into glucose system could increased the removal rate of Cr(VI) by 2-3 times, and the ions of molasses had no significant effect on the reduction. Excitation emission matrix fluorescence spectra and electrochemical analysis proved that the molasses contained humic acid-like substances, which had the ability of electron shuttle and improved the reduction rate of Cr(VI). In the process of bioreduction, the composition of molasses changed and the electron transport capacity increased from 104.2 to 446.5 μmol/(g C), but these substances could not be used as electron transport media to continuously enhance the reduction effect. This study is of great significance to fully understand the role and application of molasses.

Biochar facilitated bacterial reduction of Cr(VI) by Shewanella Putrefaciens CN32: Pathways and surface characteristics

Biochar can facilitate the microbial reduction of various pollutants in soil and groundwater environments, but its impact on Cr(VI) reduction by dissimilatory metal reducing bacteria (DMRB) remains to be systematically investigated. In this study, we prepared biochars at 500 °C and 700 °C from wheat straw and grass, and investigated the impact of these biochars on Cr(VI) reduction by a model DMRB, Shewanella Putrefaciens CN32 (CN32). Pristine biochars abiotically reduced Cr(VI), which decreased the concentration and toxicity of chromium to CN32 cells, and brought about higher overall Cr(VI) removal extent after CN32 were added sequentially; on the other hand, no enhancement effect were observed when biochars and CN32 were added simultaneously. Further tests between biologically reduced biochars and Cr(VI) revealed that the reaction rates between bioreduced biochars and Cr(VI) are relatively sluggish compared to that of direct Cr(VI) reduction by CN32, which prohibited biochars from directly accelerating the Cr(VI) reduction by CN32 in simultaneous-addition scenario. The relative importance of biochars' surface functional groups and surface areas on their reactivities towards Cr(VI) reduction were also investigated. This study deepened our understanding towards the role of biochar played during bacterial Cr(VI) reduction and could potentially contribute to optimizing the biochar-based Cr(VI) bioremediation strategies.

Chemical-Assisted Microbially Mediated Chromium (Cr) (VI) Reduction Under the Influence of Various Electron Donors, Redox Mediators, and Other Additives: An Outlook on Enhanced Cr(VI) Removal

Chromium (Cr) (VI) is a well-known toxin to all types of biological organisms. Over the past few decades, many investigators have employed numerous bioprocesses to neutralize the toxic effects of Cr(VI). One of the main process for its treatment is bioreduction into Cr(III). Key to this process is the ability of microbial enzymes, which facilitate the transfer of electrons into the high valence state of the metal that acts as an electron acceptor. Many underlying previous efforts have stressed on the use of different external organic and inorganic substances as electron donors to promote Cr(VI) reduction process by different microorganisms. The use of various redox mediators enabled electron transport facility for extracellular Cr(VI) reduction and accelerated the reaction. Also, many chemicals have employed diverse roles to improve the Cr(VI) reduction process in different microorganisms. The application of aforementioned materials at the contaminated systems has offered a variety of influence on Cr(VI) bioremediation by altering microbial community structures and functions and redox environment. The collective insights suggest that the knowledge of appropriate implementation of suitable nutrients can strongly inspire the Cr(VI) reduction rate and efficiency. However, a comprehensive information on such substances and their roles and biochemical pathways in different microorganisms remains elusive. In this regard, our review sheds light on the contributions of various chemicals as electron donors, redox mediators, cofactors, etc., on microbial Cr(VI) reduction for enhanced treatment practices.