1
|
Naratornsirakul D, Chewaskulyong B, Kongkarnka S, Oranratnachai S. Comparison of treatment outcome between first-line combination immunotherapy (anti-PD-L1 or anti-PD1) with or without chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients in tertiary care hospital. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e70007. [PMID: 39030820 PMCID: PMC11257996 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Revised: 06/26/2024] [Accepted: 06/30/2024] [Indexed: 07/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite promising outcomes of first-line immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), limited accessibility due to reimbursement was remain the problem in low to middle income countries. This study aimed to evaluate real-world effectiveness of immunotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC in Northern Thailand. METHOD A retrospective, single-centered cohort, was conducted. Patients with advanced NSCLC who underwent PD-L1 testing (excluding EGFR and ALK mutations) and were treated with immunotherapy or without chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone were included. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events. RESULTS A total of 123 patients, of which 21 patients received immunotherapy-based regimen and 102 patients received chemotherapy alone. The median PFS was 11.9 months in immunotherapy-based group compared to 5.93 months in the chemotherapy group, with a. hazard ratio (HR) of 0.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.68; p = 0.001). Similarly, the median OS was 26.68 months in the immunotherapy-based group and 11.21 months in the chemotherapy group, with HR of 0.42 (95% CI 0.22-0.8; p = 0.009). ORRs were significantly higher in the immunotherapy-based group, with 65% of patients showing a response compared to 32% in the chemotherapy group (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION The result of this real-world study in patients with advanced stage NSCLC indicate that first-line immunotherapy-based regimen was associated with significantly greater PFS, OS, and ORR with a safety profile consistent with pivotal studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danainut Naratornsirakul
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of MedicineChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand
| | - Busyamas Chewaskulyong
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of MedicineChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand
| | - Sarawut Kongkarnka
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of MedicineChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Prete M, Ballarin G, Porciello G, Arianna A, Luongo A, Belli V, Scalfi L, Celentano E. Bioelectrical impedance analysis-derived phase angle (PhA) in lung cancer patients: a systematic review. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:608. [PMID: 38769506 PMCID: PMC11106952 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12378-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung cancer is the second most diagnosed cancer in the world. Up to 84% of diagnosed patients have malnutrition, which can negatively affect quality of life and survival and may worsen with neoadjuvant treatment. Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis-Derived Phase Angle (PhA) in these patients could be a valid tool to assess the nutritional status in order to improve their condition. METHODS This review provides an update on PhA assessment in lung cancer patients over the past twenty years. We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane, for articles regarding the PhA obtained from Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in lung cancer patients. The authors independently performed a literature search: sample size, patient population, study type, study dates, survival and interventions were evaluated. The final review included 11 studies from different countries. RESULTS Eight studies only considered patients with lung cancer, while three studies considered patients with different kind of cancer, including lung. Correlation data between PhA and age are conflicting. In patients undergoing clinical treatment and patients undergoing surgical treatment lower PhA was observed. A lower PhA is associated with a shorter survival. In three studies emerged a relationship between Karnofski Performance Status and Handgrip Strenght with PhA. From one study, univariate logistic regression analysis showed that higher PhA values represent a protective factor for sarcopenia. CONCLUSION Our research underlined interesting, but not conclusive, results on this topic; however more researches are needed to understand the clinical meaning of PhA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melania Prete
- Division of Radiotherapy, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, 80131, Italy
| | - Giada Ballarin
- Department of Medical, Movement Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Naples "Parthenope", Naples, 80133, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Porciello
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, 80131, Italy.
| | - Aniello Arianna
- Department of Public Health, Federico II University Hospital, Via Pansini 5, Naples, 80131, Italy
| | - Assunta Luongo
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, 80131, Italy
| | - Valentina Belli
- Scientific Direction, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, 80131, Italy
| | - Luca Scalfi
- Department of Public Health, Federico II University Hospital, Via Pansini 5, Naples, 80131, Italy
| | - Egidio Celentano
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, 80131, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Caccialanza R, Laviano A, Bosetti C, Nardi M, Casalone V, Titta L, Mele R, De Pergola G, De Lorenzo F, Pedrazzoli P. Clinical and economic value of oral nutrition supplements in patients with cancer: a position paper from the Survivorship Care and Nutritional Support Working Group of Alliance Against Cancer. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:9667-9679. [PMID: 35792925 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07269-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
Malnutrition is a common clinical and public health problem that can frequently affect patients in hospital and community settings. In particular, cancer-related malnutrition results from a combination of metabolic dysregulation and anorexia, caused both by the tumor itself and by its treatment. Patients with head-neck cancer, or with gastroesophageal, pancreatic, lung, and colorectal cancer, are particularly at risk of developing malnutrition, with a prevalence varying between 30 and 50% depending on tumor location and anti-cancer treatment complications. Prevention and adequate management of malnutrition is now considered an essential key point of therapeutic pathways of patients with cancer, with the aim to enhance their quality of life, reduce complications, and improve clinical outcomes. Oral nutritional supplements (ONS) are part of the nutritional therapy and represent an effective tool to address cancer-related malnutrition, as supported by growing literature data. However, patients' access to ONS - which is regulated by different national and regional policies in terms of reimbursement - is quite heterogeneous. This narrative review aims to summarize the current knowledge about the role of ONS in terms of cost-effectiveness in the management of actively treated patients with cancer, following surgery and/or radiotherapy/chemotherapy treatment and to present the position on this issue of the Alliance Against Cancer, the Italian National Oncology Network, coming up from a focused virtual roundtable of the Survivorship Care and Nutritional Support Working Group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Caccialanza
- Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Golgi 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Laviano
- Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Cristina Bosetti
- Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Mariateresa Nardi
- Nutritional Support Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Valentina Casalone
- Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Turin, Italy
| | - Lucilla Titta
- Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Mele
- Hospital Health Direction, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni De Pergola
- Unit of Geriatrics and Internal Medicine, National Institute of Gastroenterology "Saverio de Bellis" Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Pedrazzoli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Avancini A, Belluomini L, Borsati A, Riva ST, Trestini I, Tregnago D, Dodi A, Lanza M, Pompili C, Mazzarotto R, Micheletto C, Motton M, Scarpa A, Schena F, Milella M, Pilotto S. Integrating supportive care into the multidisciplinary management of lung cancer: we can't wait any longer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2022; 22:725-735. [PMID: 35608060 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2022.2082410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Due to important achievements in terms of diagnostic and therapeutic tools and the complexity of the disease itself, lung cancer management needs a multidisciplinary approach. To date, the classical multidisciplinary team involves different healthcare providers mainly dedicated to lung cancer diagnosis and treatments. Nevertheless, the underlying disease and related treatments significantly impact on patient function and psychological well-being. In this sense, supportive care may offer the best approach to relieve and manage patient symptoms and treatment-related adverse events. AREAS COVERED Evidence report that exercise, nutrition, smoking cessation and psychological well-being bring many benefits in patients with lung cancer, from both a physical and socio-psychological points of view, and potentially improving their survival. Nevertheless, supportive care is rarely offered to patients, and even less frequently these needs are discussed within the multidisciplinary meeting. EXPERT OPINION Integrating supportive care as part of the standard multidisciplinary approach for lung cancer involves a series of challenges, the first one represented by the daily necessity of specialists, such as kinesiologists, dietitians, psycho-oncologists, able to deliver a personalized approach. In the era of precision medicine this is an essential step forward to guarantee comprehensive and patient-centered care for all patients with lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Avancini
- Section of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona School of Medicine and Verona University Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.,Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Belluomini
- Section of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona School of Medicine and Verona University Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Anita Borsati
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Silvia Teresa Riva
- Section of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona School of Medicine and Verona University Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Ilaria Trestini
- Section of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona School of Medicine and Verona University Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Daniela Tregnago
- Section of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona School of Medicine and Verona University Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandra Dodi
- Section of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona School of Medicine and Verona University Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Massimo Lanza
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Cecilia Pompili
- Thoracic Surgery Department, University of Verona School of Medicine and Verona University Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Renzo Mazzarotto
- Section of Radiotherapy, Department of Surgery and Oncology, University of Verona School of Medicine and Verona University Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Claudio Micheletto
- Pulmonary Unit, University of Verona School of Medicine and Verona University Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Motton
- Radiology Department, University of Verona School of Medicine and Verona University Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Aldo Scarpa
- Section of Pathology, Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, University of Verona School of Medicine and Verona University Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Federico Schena
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Michele Milella
- Section of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona School of Medicine and Verona University Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Sara Pilotto
- Section of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona School of Medicine and Verona University Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pilotto S, Agustoni F, Morelli AM, Lobascio F, Cereda E, Bironzo P, Trestini I, Milella M, Novello S, Pedrazzoli P, Caccialanza R. Nutritional support in lung cancer: time to combine immunonutrition with immunotherapy? Nutrition 2022; 98:111637. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2022.111637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
6
|
Rotolo S, Di Giorgio A, Cintoni M, Rinninella E, Palombaro M, Pulcini G, Schena CA, Chiantera V, Vizzielli G, Gasbarrini A, Pacelli F, Mele MC. Body composition and immunonutritional status in patients treated with pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for gastrointestinal peritoneal metastases: a prospective single-center analysis. Pleura Peritoneum 2022; 7:9-17. [PMID: 35602923 PMCID: PMC9069500 DOI: 10.1515/pp-2021-0142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a novel drug administration method with promising efficacy for the treatment of peritoneal metastases (PM). This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of an immunonutritional assessment on the feasibility, safety, and survival in this setting.
Methods
Data of PM patients undergoing PIPAC between September 2018 and May 2020 were prospectively recorded. A CT scan-derived body composition assessment was performed for each patient.
Results
Fifty-one patients were enrolled, of which 30 (58%) underwent multiple PIPAC cycles, with a pathological response rate of 55%. Prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and neutrophil-to-lymphocytes predicted completion of more than one PIPAC cycle, with a cut off of 36.5 and 4.8 respectively. Muscle attenuation and body fat tissues were associated with pathological response. At multivariate Cox regression analysis, only the presence of a low PNI (HR 2.41, 95% CI 1.08–5.46) was significantly associated with a worse OS.
Conclusions
A pretreatment immunonutritional assessment may provide valuable information for PIPAC patients’ selection and survival, while body composition parameters are able to predict pathological response. Further larger studies are needed to validate the role of these biomarkers in tailoring the treatment and monitoring PM patients undergoing PIPAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Rotolo
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche , UOC Chirurgia del Peritoneo e del Retroperitoneo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS , Rome , Italy
- Dipartimento di Discipline Chirurgiche, Oncologiche e Stomatologiche (Di.Chir.On.S.) , Università degli Studi di Palermo , Palermo , Italy
| | - Andrea Di Giorgio
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche , UOC Chirurgia del Peritoneo e del Retroperitoneo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS , Rome , Italy
| | - Marco Cintoni
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche , UOC di Nutrizione Clinica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS , Rome , Italy
| | - Emanuele Rinninella
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche , UOC di Nutrizione Clinica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS , Rome , Italy
| | - Marta Palombaro
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche , UOSD di Nutrizione Avanzata in Oncologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS , Rome , Italy
| | - Gabriele Pulcini
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche , UOSD di Nutrizione Avanzata in Oncologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS , Rome , Italy
| | - Carlo Alberto Schena
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche , UOC Chirurgia del Peritoneo e del Retroperitoneo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS , Rome , Italy
| | - Vito Chiantera
- Dipartimento di Discipline Chirurgiche, Oncologiche e Stomatologiche (Di.Chir.On.S.) , Università degli Studi di Palermo , Palermo , Italy
| | - Giuseppe Vizzielli
- Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica , UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS , Rome , Italy
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche , UOC Medicina Interna e Gastroenterologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS , Rome , Italy
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale , Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore , Rome , Italy
| | - Fabio Pacelli
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche , UOC Chirurgia del Peritoneo e del Retroperitoneo, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS , Rome , Italy
| | - Maria Cristina Mele
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche , UOSD di Nutrizione Avanzata in Oncologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS , Rome , Italy
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale , Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore , Rome , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Eraslan Doganay G, Ulger G. The Relationship of Nutritional Treatments Applied to Patients in a Nutritional Clinic and Mortality. Cureus 2022; 14:e21579. [PMID: 35233299 PMCID: PMC8880877 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.21579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
|
8
|
Trestini I, Cintoni M, Rinninella E, Grassi F, Paiella S, Salvia R, Bria E, Pozzo C, Alfieri S, Gasbarrini A, Tortora G, Milella M, Mele MC. Neoadjuvant treatment: A window of opportunity for nutritional prehabilitation in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13:885-903. [PMID: 34621468 PMCID: PMC8462076 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i9.885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Revised: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients affected by pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) frequently present with advanced disease at the time of diagnosis, limiting an upfront surgical approach. Neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) has become the standard of care to downstage non-metastatic locally advanced PDAC. However, this treatment increases the risk of a nutritional status decline, which in turn, may impact therapeutic tolerance, postoperative outcomes, or even prevent the possibility of surgery. Literature on prehabilitation programs on surgical PDAC patients show a reduction of postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and readmission rate, while data on prehabilitation in NAT patients are scarce and randomized controlled trials are still missing. Particularly, appropriate nutritional management represents an important therapeutic strategy to promote tissue healing and to enhance patient recovery after surgical trauma. In this regard, NAT may represent a new interesting window of opportunity to implement a nutritional prehabilitation program, aiming to increase the PDAC patient's capacity to complete the planned therapy and potentially improve clinical and survival outcomes. Given these perspectives, this review attempts to provide an in-depth view of the nutritional derangements during NAT and nutritional prehabilitation program as well as their impact on PDAC patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Trestini
- Section of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona 37126, Italy
| | - Marco Cintoni
- Scuola di Specializzazione in Scienza dell’Alimentazione, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, Roma 00133, Italy
| | - Emanuele Rinninella
- UOC Nutrizione Clinica, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma 00168, Italy
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma 00168, Italy
| | - Futura Grassi
- UOC Nutrizione Clinica, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma 00168, Italy
| | - Salvatore Paiella
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona 37126, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvia
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona 37126, Italy
| | - Emilio Bria
- Oncologia Medica Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma 00167, Italy
- Oncologia Medica Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma 00168, Italy
| | - Carmelo Pozzo
- Oncologia Medica Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma 00167, Italy
- Oncologia Medica Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma 00168, Italy
| | - Sergio Alfieri
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma 00168, Italy
- Digestive Surgery Unit and Pancreatic Surgery Gemelli Center Director, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma 00167, Italy
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma 00168, Italy
- UOC di Medicina Interna e Gastroenterologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma 00167, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Tortora
- Oncologia Medica Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma 00167, Italy
- Oncologia Medica Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma 00168, Italy
| | - Michele Milella
- Section of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona 37126, Italy
| | - Maria Cristina Mele
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma 00168, Italy
- UOSD Nutrizione Avanzata in Oncologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Roma 00167, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fat mass assessment using the triceps skinfold thickness enhances the prognostic value of the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria in patients with lung cancer. Br J Nutr 2021; 127:1506-1516. [PMID: 34218831 DOI: 10.1017/s0007114521002531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The present study evaluated whether fat mass assessment using the triceps skinfold (TSF) thickness provides additional prognostic value to the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) framework in patients with lung cancer (LC). We performed an observational cohort study including 2672 LC patients in China. Comprehensive demographic, disease and nutritional characteristics were collected. Malnutrition was retrospectively defined using the GLIM criteria, and optimal stratification was used to determine the best thresholds for the TSF. The associations of malnutrition and TSF categories with survival were estimated independently and jointly by calculating multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HR). Malnutrition was identified in 808 (30·2 %) patients, and the best TSF thresholds were 9·5 mm in men and 12 mm in women. Accordingly, 496 (18·6 %) patients were identified as having a low TSF. Patients with concurrent malnutrition and a low TSF had a 54 % (HR = 1·54, 95 % CI = 1·25, 1·88) greater death hazard compared with well-nourished individuals, which was also greater compared with malnourished patients with a normal TSF (HR = 1·23, 95 % CI = 1·06, 1·43) or malnourished patients without TSF assessment (HR = 1·31, 95 % CI = 1·14, 1·50). These associations were concentrated among those patients with adequate muscle mass (as indicated by the calf circumference). Additional fat mass assessment using the TSF enhances the prognostic value of the GLIM criteria. Using the population-derived thresholds for the TSF may provide significant prognostic value when used in combination with the GLIM criteria to guide strategies to optimise the long-term outcomes in patients with LC.
Collapse
|
10
|
Bossi P, Delrio P, Mascheroni A, Zanetti M. The Spectrum of Malnutrition/Cachexia/Sarcopenia in Oncology According to Different Cancer Types and Settings: A Narrative Review. Nutrients 2021; 13:1980. [PMID: 34207529 PMCID: PMC8226689 DOI: 10.3390/nu13061980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 152] [Impact Index Per Article: 50.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2021] [Revised: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Nutritional status in oncological patients may differ according to several modifiable and non-modifiable factors. Knowledge of the epidemiology of malnutrition/cachexia/sarcopenia may help to manage these complications early in the course of treatment, potentially impacting patient quality of life, treatment intensity, and disease outcome. Therefore, this narrative review aimed to critically evaluate the current evidence on the combined impact of tumor- and treatment-related factors on nutritional status and to draw some practical conclusions to support the multidisciplinary management of malnutrition in cancer patients. A comprehensive literature search was performed from January 2010 to December 2020 using different combinations of pertinent keywords and a critical evaluation of retrieved literature papers was conducted. The results show that the prevalence of weight loss and associated symptoms is quite heterogeneous and needs to be assessed with recognized criteria, thus allowing a clear classification and standardization of therapeutic interventions. There is a large range of variability influenced by age and social factors, comorbidities, and setting of cures (community-dwelling versus hospitalized patients). Tumor subsite is one of the major determinants of malnutrition, with pancreatic, esophageal, and other gastroenteric cancers, head and neck, and lung cancers having the highest prevalence. The advanced stage is also linked to a higher risk of developing malnutrition, as an expression of the relationship between tumor burden, inflammatory status, reduced caloric intake, and malabsorption. Finally, treatment type influences the risk of nutritional issues, both for locoregional approaches (surgery and radiotherapy) and for systemic treatment. Interestingly, personalized approaches based on the selection of the most predictive malnutrition definitions for postoperative complications according to cancer type and knowledge of specific nutritional problems associated with some new agents may positively impact disease course. Sharing common knowledge between oncologists and nutritionists may help to better address and treat malnutrition in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Bossi
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Paolo Delrio
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Fondazione Giovanni Pascale IRCCS-Italia, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Annalisa Mascheroni
- Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics Unit, ASST Melegnano-Martesana, 20077 Melegnano, Italy
| | - Michela Zanetti
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Trieste, 34100 Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mediterranean Diet Implementation to Protect against Advanced Lung Cancer Index (ALI) Rise: Study Design and Preliminary Results of a Randomised Controlled Trial. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18073700. [PMID: 33916252 PMCID: PMC8036451 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18073700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2021] [Revised: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The Mediterranean diet (MD) has been inversely associated with lung cancer (LC) risk. Hereby we show the preliminary results of our prospective randomised controlled trial in inflammatory and nutritional status of LC patients after 3-month implementation of MD. In total, 30 patients with small-cell or non-small-cell LC (stages III–IV) were enrolled. They were randomly assigned either to Control group, receiving general nutritional guidelines, or the MD group, in which a personalised MD plan was provided. Medical and dietary history, anthropometrics, blood biomarkers, and circulating antioxidant vitamins were assessed. The main outcome was a significantly higher advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) in patients of the control arm than those following MD (p = 0.003). In the MD group, platelets were significantly reduced at the study endpoint (p = 0.044). BMI and body fat mass remained unchanged in both arms, but serum glucose was significantly higher in control compared to MD group (p = 0.017). In conclusion, we showed for the first time that implementing a personalised MD for 3 months is promising to regulate prognostic biomarkers in advanced LC. The final results of our on-going trial will shed a light on the inflammatory, antioxidant and nutritional status of LC patients following MD.
Collapse
|