Outcomes of Patients With in- and out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest on Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Single-center Retrospective Cohort Study

An insight regarding the article 'Predictors and rate of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.'

Advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic approaches have led to a remarkable reduction in the morbidity and mortality rates associated with a variety of diseases. In the context of acute ischemic heart disease, significant milestones have been achieved, beginning with the establishment of cardiac ICUs. These were pivotal in providing specialized care for patients with severe heart conditions. Subsequent to this development, methods to restore blood flow in areas compromised by arterial blockages were introduced. Initially, systemic thrombolysis was the primary method used, but it has since been largely supplanted by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), also known as primary coronary angioplasty, which is now the preferred treatment due to its effectiveness and safety. The incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) where resuscitation attempts have been made, whether successful or not, is significant and presents a considerable challenge. Unfortunately, the mortality rate among these patients remains distressingly high, and efforts to reduce it are fraught with difficulty. It is crucial to acknowledge that survival from an OHCA does not automatically equate to a favorable clinical outcome, as serious neurological impairments are common sequelae of such events. In addition to mortality rates, the term "survival with favorable neurologic outcome" has emerged as another critical measure of the success of resuscitation efforts. This parameter underscores the importance of not only saving lives but also preserving the quality of life for survivors. The ability to restore both life and cognitive function is a testament to the comprehensiveness of care provided to OHCA patients.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Pathway for Management of Refractory Cardiac Arrest: a Retrospective Study From a National Center of Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

BACKGROUND

Cardiac arrest remains a critical condition with high mortality and catastrophic neurological impact. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) has been introduced as an adjunct in cardiopulmonary resuscitation modalities. However, survival with good neurological outcomes remains a major concern. This study aims to explore our early experience with ECPR and identify the factors associated with survival in patients presenting with refractory cardiac arrest.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study analyzing 6-year data from a tertiary center, the country reference for ECPR. This study was conducted at a national center of ECPR. Participants of this study were adult patients who experienced witnessed refractory cardiopulmonary arrest and were supported by ECPR. ECPR was performed for eligible patients as per the local service protocols.

RESULTS

Data from 87 patients were analyzed; of this cohort, 62/87 patients presented with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) and 25/87 presented with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Overall survival to decannulation and hospital discharge rates were 26.4% and 25.3%, respectively. Among survivors (n = 22), 19 presented with IHCA (30.6%), while only 3 survivors presented with OHCA (12%). A total of 15/87 (17%) patients were alive at 6-month follow-up. All survivors had good neurological function assessed as Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2. Multivariate logistic regression to predict survival to hospital discharge showed that IHCA was the only independent predictor (odds ratio: 5.8, P = 0.042); however, this positive association disappeared after adjusting for the first left ventricular ejection fraction after resuscitation.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the use of ECPR for IHCA was associated with a higher survival to discharge compared to OHCA. This study demonstrated a comparable survival rate to other established centers, particularly for IHCA. Neurological outcomes were comparable in both IHCA and OHCA survivors. However, large multicenter studies are warranted for better understanding and improving the outcomes.

Risk factors for neurological disability outcomes in patients under extracorporeal membrane oxygenation following cardiac arrest: An observational study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify factors associated with neurological and disability outcomes in patients who underwent ECMO following cardiac arrest.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center, observational study included adult patients who received ECMO treatment for in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) between February 2016 and March 2020. Factors associated with neurological and disability outcomes in these patients who underwent ECMO were assessed.

SETTING

Hamad General Hospital, Qatar.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Neurological disability outcomes were assessed using the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) scale.

RESULTS

Among the 48 patients included, 37 (77 %) experienced OHCA, and 11 (23 %) had IHCA. The 28-day survival rate was 14 (29.2 %). Of the survivors, 9 (64.3 %) achieved a good neurological outcome, while 5 (35.7 %) experienced poor neurological outcomes. Regarding disability, 5 (35.7 %) of survivors had no disability, while 9 (64.3 %) had some form of disability. The results showed significantly shorter median time intervals in minutes, including collapse to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (3 vs. 6, P = 0.001), CPR duration (12 vs. 35, P = 0.001), CPR to extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) (20 vs. 40, P = 0.001), and collapse-to-ECPR (23 vs. 45, P = 0.001), in the good outcome group compared to the poor outcome group.

CONCLUSION

This study emphasizes the importance of minimizing the time between collapse and CPR/ECMO initiation to improve neurological outcomes and reduce disability in cardiac arrest patients. However, no significant associations were found between outcomes and other demographic or clinical variables in this study. Further research with a larger sample size is needed to validate these findings.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

The study underscores the significance of reducing the time between collapse and the initiation of CPR and ECMO. Shorter time intervals were associated with improved neurological outcomes and reduced disability in cardiac arrest patients.

What factors are effective on the CPR duration of patients under extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is an alternative method for patients with reversible causes of cardiac arrest (CA) after conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR). However, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) duration during ECPR can vary due to multiple factors. Healthcare providers need to understand these factors to optimize the resuscitation process and improve outcomes. The aim of this study was to examine the different variables impacting the duration of CPR in patients undergoing ECPR.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center, observational study was conducted on adult patients who underwent ECPR due to in-hospital CA (IHCA) or out-of-hospital CA (OHCA) at Hamad General Hospital (HGH), the tertiary governmental hospital of Qatar, between February 2016 and March 2020. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the prognostic factors associated with CPR duration, including demographic and clinical variables, as well as laboratory tests.

RESULTS

The mean ± standard division age of the 48 participants who underwent ECPR was 41.50 ± 13.15 years, and 75% being male. OHCA and IHCA were reported in 77.1% and 22.9% of the cases, respectively. The multivariate analysis revealed that several factors were significantly associated with an increased CPR duration: higher age (OR: 1.981, 95%CI: 1.021-3.364, P = 0.025), SOFA score (OR: 3.389, 95%CI: 1.289-4.911, P = 0.013), presence of comorbidities (OR: 3.715, 95%CI: 1.907-5.219, P = 0.026), OHCA (OR: 3.715, 95%CI: 1.907-5.219, P = 0.026), and prolonged collapse-to-CPR time (OR: 1.446, 95%CI:1.092-3.014, P = 0.001). Additionally, the study found that the initial shockable rhythm was inversely associated with the duration of CPR (OR: 0.271, 95%CI: 0.161-0.922, P = 0.045). However, no significant associations were found between laboratory tests and CPR duration.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that age, SOFA score, comorbidities, OHCA, collapse-to-CPR time, and initial shockable rhythm are important factors influencing the duration of CPR in patients undergoing ECPR. Understanding these factors can help healthcare providers better predict and manage CPR duration, potentially improving patient outcomes. Further research is warranted to validate these findings and explore additional factors that may impact CPR duration in this population.

Integrative analyses and validation of ferroptosis-related genes and mechanisms associated with cerebrovascular and cardiovascular ischemic diseases

BACKGROUND

There has been a gradual increase in the occurrence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular ischemic diseases, particularly as comorbidities. Yet, the mechanisms underlying these diseases remain unclear. Ferroptosis has emerged as a potential contributor to cardio-cerebral ischemic processes. Therefore, this study investigated the shared biological mechanisms between the two processes, as well as the role of ferroptosis genes in cardio-cerebral ischemic damage, by constructing co-expression modules for myocardial ischemia (MI) and ischemic stroke (IS) and a network of protein-protein interactions, mRNA-miRNA, mRNA-transcription factors (TFs), mRNA-RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), and mRNA-drug interactions.

RESULTS

The study identified seven key genes, specifically ACSL1, TLR4, ADIPOR1, G0S2, PDK4, HP, PTGS2, and subjected them to functional enrichment analysis during ischemia. The predicted miRNAs were found to interact with 35 hub genes, and interactions were observed between 11 hub genes and 30 TF transcription factors. Additionally, 10 RBPs corresponding to 16 hub genes and 163 molecular compounds corresponding to 30 hub genes were identified. This study also clarified the levels of immune infiltration between MI and IS and different subtypes. Finally, we identified four hub genes, including TLR4, by using a diagnostic model constructed by Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression analysis; ADIPOR1, G0S2, and HP were shown to have diagnostic value for the co-pathogenesis of MI and cerebral ischemia by both validation test data and RT-qPCR assay.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best our knowledge, this study is the first to utilize multiple algorithms to comprehensively analyze the biological processes of MI and IS from various perspectives. The four hub genes, TLR4, ADIPOR1, G0S2, and HP, have proven valuable in offering insights for the investigation of shared injury pathways in cardio-cerebral injuries. Therefore, these genes may serve as diagnostic markers for cardio-cerebral ischemic diseases.