The functional outcome and quality of life after treatment of isolated medial malleolar fractures

Lag screw versus locking plate fixation for traumatic displaced medial malleolar fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Lag screw fixation (LSF) or locking plate fixation (LPF) are both recommended for the treatment of medial malleolar fractures (MMFs). However, no standard has been established for attaining optimal surgical treatment or functional recovery. We hypothesized that LPF for MMFs would result in superior outcomes compared to LSF. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical outcomes of LSF and LPF in the treatment of MMF.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We searched for studies published prior to November 2023 across the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Standardization of individual effect sizes was conducted; subsequently, pooled effect sizes were derived by employing random-effects models.

RESULTS

Five retrospective studies involving 394 patients were reviewed. American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores were significantly higher among patients who received LPF (mean difference [MD]: 2.21; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37-4.04; p = 0.02) than among those who received LSF. Pain scores were significantly lower among patients who received LPF (MD: -0.35; 95% CI: -0.64 to -0.05; p = 0.02) than among those who received LSF. No significant differences in delayed union was observed between the groups (Relative risk [RR]: 1.43; 95% CI, 0.37-4.04; p = 0.42). Fixation failure was slightly higher in patients who received LSF than in those who received LPF (RR: 3.11; 95% CI, 0.88-11.01; p = 0.08).

DISCUSSION

Compared with LSF, LPF yields superior functional outcomes, superior patient comfort, and comparative complication rates. LPF is also better able to prevent rotation and apply compressive forces across fracture sites, which can facilitate the management of different types of MMF. Additional randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Operative vs Nonoperative Management of Unstable Medial Malleolus Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Unstable ankle fractures are routinely managed operatively. However, because of soft tissue and implant-related complications, recent literature has reported on the nonoperative management of well-reduced medial malleolus fractures after fibular stabilization, but with limited evidence supporting the routine application.

Objective

To assess the superiority of internal fixation of well-reduced (displacement ≤2 mm) medial malleolus fractures compared with nonfixation after fibular stabilization.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This superiority, pragmatic, parallel, prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted from October 1, 2017, to August 31, 2021. A total of 154 adult participants (≥16 years) with a closed, unstable bimalleolar or trimalleolar ankle fracture requiring surgery at an academic major trauma center in the UK were assessed. Exclusion criteria included injuries with no medial-sided fracture, open fractures, neurovascular injury, and the inability to comply with follow-up. Data analysis was performed in July 2022 and confirmed in September 2023.

Interventions

Once the lateral (and where appropriate, posterior) malleolus had been fixed and satisfactory intraoperative reduction of the medial malleolus fracture was confirmed by the operating surgeon, participants were randomly allocated to fixation (n = 78) or nonfixation (n = 76) of the medial malleolus.

Main Outcome and Measure

Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) 1 year after randomization (range, 0-100 points, with 0 indicating worst possible outcome and 100 indicating best possible outcome).

Results

Among 154 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 56.5 [16.7] years; 119 [77%] female), 144 (94%) completed the trial. At 1 year, the median OMAS was 80.0 (IQR, 60.0-90.0) in the fixation group compared with 72.5 (IQR, 55.0-90.0) in the nonfixation group (P = .17). Complication rates were comparable. Significantly more patients in the nonfixation group developed a radiographic nonunion (20% vs 0%; P < .001), with 8 of 13 clinically asymptomatic; 1 patient required surgical reintervention for this. Fracture type and reduction quality appeared to influence fracture union and patient outcome.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial comparing internal fixation of well-reduced medial malleolus fractures with nonfixation, after fibular stabilization, fixation was not superior according to the primary outcome. However, 1 in 5 patients developed a radiographic nonunion after nonfixation, and although the reintervention rate to manage this was low, the future implications are unknown. These results support selective nonfixation of anatomically reduced medial malleolar fractures after fibular stabilization.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03362229.

Evaluation of Contact Area and Pressure After Malreduction in Isolated Medial Malleolar Fractures With 2 mm of Displacement: A Cadaveric Study

This study was performed to evaluate the changes in contact area and pressure in the tibiotalar joint, with a 2 mm displacement after IMMF (isolated medial malleolar fracture). Ten cadavers with pairs were used to establish a situation in which IMMF occurred during ankle injury. We performed IMMF corresponding to types C and D of the Herscovici classification, and it was displaced by 2 mm. The normal group was defined as a normal tibiotalar joint, the TF (transverse fracture) group as a 2 mm transverse displacement corresponding to the Herscovici classification type C, and the OF (oblique fracture) group as a 2 mm oblique displacement corresponding to the Herscovici classification type D. We measured the contact area and pressure at the tibiotalar joint. The film was scanned and analyzed using the digital imaging software, Scion Image (Scion Crop. Frederick, MD). In normal group, the average contact area of the tibiotalar joint was 317 mm2 (IQR; interquartile range, 256; 347) and 308 mm2 (IQR, 262; 364), average pressure was 2.19 N/mm2 (IQR, 1.94; 2.27) and 2.15 N/mm2 (IQR, 2.06; 2.53). In the TF and OF groups, the average contact area of the tibiotalar joint decreased by 9% and 12%, respectively, and the average pressure increased by 8% and 14%, respectively. There was no statistical difference in peak pressure between the normal, TF, and OF groups. In the case of transverse and oblique fractures, a 2 mm displacement showed significant changes in contact area and contact pressure compared to the normal tibiotalar joint, but there were no significant changes pertaining to type, between the 2 fractures.

Tension band wiring versus screw fixation for the treatment of medial malleolar fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Tension band wiring (TBW) and screw fixation (SF) are common surgical treatments for medial malleolar fractures (MMFs); however, no systematic review has identified which fixation method is superior. This study aimed to determine the most optimal MMF fixation method by comparing the clinical and radiological outcomes of TBW and SF through a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that there may be differences in outcomes between TBW and SF for treating MMFs.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for studies that compared TBW and SF for MMF treatment published through June 8, 2021. Fracture union, outcome scores, and postoperative complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

We included 10 studies with 512 MMF cases; 218 and 294 patients were treated with TBW and SF, respectively. Pooled analysis revealed no significant differences between them for all outcome variables, including the time to fracture union (mean difference=-0.59 weeks; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.82 to 0.64; p=0.35; I2=70%), number of excellent or good outcomes based on the final Olerud and Molander Ankle score (odds ratio [OR], 1.46; 95% CI, 0.53-5.02; p=0.47; I2=0%), delayed union rate (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.34-2.59; p=0.91; I2=17%), superficial infection rate (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.33-4.26; p=0.79; I2=0%), and number of fixation failures (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.16-1.74; p=0.29; I2=13%).

CONCLUSIONS

Both TBW and SF are excellent clinical and radiological methods for MMF fixation. However, an appropriate fixation method should be chosen according to the fracture type and size and bone quality considering the advantages and disadvantages of each method.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, meta-analysis.

Effect of coronal fracture angle on the stability of screw fixation in medial malleolar fractures: A finite element analysis

Malleolar screw fixation is the most widely used treatment method for medial malleolar (MM) fractures. Here, although buttress plate fixation is advocated for vertical MM fractures, the angular discrimination between oblique and vertical MM fractures is still not fully understood. The purpose of this study is to test the adequacy of screw fixation in MM fractures with different angles and determination of a ‘critical fracture angle’ to guide surgeons in the decision-making for screw fixation for MM fractures by utilizing an advanced engineering simulation approach. In addition to loading of the healthy tibia structure, various cases of the MM fracture double screw fixation (14 simulation scenarios in total with fracture angles between 30° and 90°, in 5° increments) were considered in this research and their static loading conditions just after fixation operation were simulated through nonlinear (geometric and contact nonlinearity) finite element analysis (FEA). Patient-specific computed tomography scan data, parametric three-dimensional solid modelling and finite element method (FEM) based engineering codes were employed in order to simulate the fixation scenarios. Visual and numerical outputs for the deformation and stress distributions, separation and sliding behaviours of the MM fracture fragments of various screw fixations were clearly exhibited through FEA results. Minimum and maximum separation distances (gap) of 3.75 and 150.34 µm between fracture fragments at fracture angles of 30° and 90° were calculated respectively against minimum and maximum sliding distances of 25.87 and 41.37 µm between fracture fragments at fracture angles of 90° and 35°, respectively. The FEA results revealed that while the separation distance was increasing, the sliding distance was decreasing and there were no distinct differences in sliding distances in the scenarios from fracture angles of 30°–90°. The limitations and errors in a FEA study are inevitable, however, it was interpreted that the FEA scenarios were setup in this study by utilizing acceptable assumptions providing logical outputs under pre-defined boundary conditions. Finally, the fracture healing threshold for separation and/or sliding distance between fracture fragments was assigned as 100 µm by referring to previous literature and it was concluded that the screws fixed perpendicular to the fracture in a MM fracture with more than 70° angle with the tibial plafond results in a significant articular separation (>100 µm) during single-leg stand. Below this critical angle of 70°, two screws provide sufficient fixation.

The new ultralow dose CT protocol for the diagnosis of fractures of the ankle: A prospective comparative study with conventional CT

PURPOSE

Computerized tomography (CT) imaging is increasingly being used to evaluate patients with ankle trauma. However, conventional CT (C CT) has a significantly higher radiation dose (RD) than plain radiography. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of ultra-low-dose CT (ULDCT) protocol for ankle fractures.

METHODS

Ninety-eight consecutive patients who had ankle CT for suspected ankle fracture were included in our prospective study. C CT and ULDCT protocols were simultaneously performed on these 98 patients. Two observers independently evaluated ULDCT and C CT images. The effective RD of the ULDCT and C CT groups was calculated.

RESULTS

The interobserver agreement was 1 (perfect). ULDCT and C CT group images showed no significant difference in image quality. The effective RD of the ULDCT was significantly lower than the C CT (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

By evaluating the results of this study, ULDCT proved to be a reliable diagnostic imaging method for fractures of the ankle. The satisfactory diagnostic image quality of the ULDCT protocol provides promising results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II/lesser quality RCT or prospective comparative study.

Using the STTGMA Risk Stratification Tool to Predict Complications, Additional Operations, and Functional Outcomes After Ankle Fracture

OBJECTIVES

To determine the usefulness of a validated trauma triage score to stratify postdischarge complications, secondary procedures, and functional outcomes after ankle fracture.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS

Four hundred fifteen patients 55 years of age and older with 431 ankle fractures.

INTERVENTION

Closed or open reduction.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Score for Trauma Triage in Geriatric and Middle-Aged Patients (STTGMA), postdischarge complications, secondary operations, Foot Function Index (FFI, n = 167), and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA, n = 165).

RESULTS

Mean age was 66 years, 38% were men, and 68% of fractures were secondary to ground-level falls. Forty patients (9.6%) required an additional procedure, with implant removal most common (n = 21, 5.1%), and 102 (25%) experienced a postdischarge complication. On multiple linear regression, STTGMA was not a significant independent predictor of complications or secondary procedures. Patients completed FFI and SMFA surveys a median of 62 months (5.2 years) after injury. On the FFI, low-risk STTGMA stratification was an independent predictor of worse functional outcomes. Similarly, low-risk stratification was a predictor of worse scores on the SMFA dysfunction and daily activity subcategories (both B > 10, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Low-risk STTGMA stratification predicted worse long-term function. The STTGMA tool was not able to meaningfully stratify risk of postdischarge complications and secondary procedures after ankle fracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Ankle fractures in the elderly: Current concepts

Ankle fractures remain the third most common musculoskeletal injury in the elderly population. The presence of osteoporosis, significant multiple comorbidities and limited functional independence makes treatment of such injuries challenging. Early studies highlighted high rates of post-operative complications and poor outcomes after surgical intervention. With advances in surgical techniques and a greater understanding of multi-disciplinary team (MDT)-driven peri-operative care and rehabilitation, evidence now appears to suggest improved outcomes for operative management. Approaches must be adapted according to co-morbidities, baseline function and patient wishes. This review article aims to discuss contemporary treatment strategies and the complex challenges associated with the management of the elderly ankle fracture.

Ankle fractures in patients over age 55 years: Predictors of functional outcome

OBJECTIVES

To identify predictors of functional outcomes following treatment of ankle fracture in patients 55 years or older.

SETTING

Level 1 Trauma Center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Four hundred twenty-nine patients with torsional ankle fractures (44A-C): 233 patients (54%) were ages 55 to 64, 25% were between the ages 65 and 74; 21% were 75 years or older.

INTERVENTION

Operative or nonoperative management of ankle fracture.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Early complications were assessed for all patients after minimum of 6 months, and functional outcome scores as assessed by the Foot Function Index (FFI; n = 166, 39%) and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA; n = 168, 39%) after median 57 months follow-up.

RESULTS

Surgical management was elected in 67% of patients. Nonoperative management became more common with advancing age and was associated with fewer unplanned operations (12% vs 3%, P < .01) and complications (21% vs 13%, P = .07). African American race was associated with worse pain on the FFI (P = .002) and BMI was associated with worse (higher) scores on all categories of the FFI and SMFA (all P < .05). Diabetes, neuropathy, and mental illness were also predictive of worse scores on various categories of both surveys. Assistive device use or nonambulatory status at the time of injury was associated with worse disability/dysfunction, activity, and mobility scores on both the FFI and SMFA (all P > 15, P < .05). Sex, Hispanic ethnicity, tobacco use, open fracture, dislocation, fracture pattern, and operative management were not independent predictors in this regression model.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline health and ambulatory capacity at injury were more predictive of outcomes following ankle fracture than were fracture characteristics or type of treatment.

Arthroscopy-Assisted Reduction in the Management of Isolated Medial Malleolar Fracture

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of arthroscopic reduction percutaneous fixation (ARPF) in the treatment of isolated medial malleolar fracture and compare the results with those of conventional open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 77 patients with isolated medial malleolar fracture between November 2011 and February 2016. The patients were assigned to the ARPF (n = 34) and ORIF (n = 43) groups. The Olerud-Molander ankle score (OMAS), ankle range of motion (ROM), visual analog scale, and radiographic evaluation were determined at the scheduled follow-up.

RESULTS

In the ARPF group, 11 of 34 patients (32.4%) had chondral lesions. Tears of the deltoid ligament and anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament were noted in 3 (8.8%) and 15 (44.1%) patients, respectively. The mean follow-up was 5 years. The mean OMAS was higher in the ARPF group than in the ORIF group. The differences were statistically significant at 6 months (mean ± standard deviation, 80.2 ± 4.0 for ARPF vs 77.2 ± 4.1 for ORIF, P = .005) and 1 year (92.9 ± 4.9 vs 88.1 ± 4.6, P < .001), but not at the latest follow-up (P = .081). Ankle ROM was markedly improved in the ARPF group, unlike in the ORIF group at 6 months (dorsiflexion, P = .025; plantarflexion, P < .001) and 1 year (dorsiflexion and plantarflexion, P < .001). The improvement remained at the latest follow-up in plantarflexion (P = .001) but not in dorsiflexion (P = .354).

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopy-assisted reduction is a feasible alternative modality with superior short-term outcomes for treating isolated medial malleolar fracture, but its superiority may be attenuated in the intermediate term.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, comparative study.

Bioabsorbable magnesium screw versus conventional titanium screw fixation for medial malleolar fractures

Background

It is still unknown whether bioabsorbable magnesium (Mg) screws provide an advantage over titanium screws in the treatment of medial malleolar (MM) fractures. The purpose of this retrospective study is to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of MM fractures fixed with either bioabsorbable Mg screws or conventional titanium screws.

Materials and methods

A cohort of 48 patients with MM fractures who underwent compression screw fixation was retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-three patients (16 male, 7 female; mean age: 37.9 ± 17.7 years) were treated with bioabsorbable Mg screws, and 25 patients (14 male, 11 female; mean age: 45.0 ± 15.7 years) were treated with conventional titanium screw fixation. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year, with a mean time of 24.6 ± 10.5 months (12–53 months). The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale was used to evaluate the clinical results. The Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) osteoarthritis grading was used to evaluate posttraumatic osteoarthritis on final ankle radiographs. Fracture union, rate of implant removal, and complications were recorded. Comparative analysis of two independent groups was performed using the chi-squared test and the Mann–Whitney U-test.

Results

The two groups were comparable concerning demographic and clinical characteristics. Age (p = 0.146), sex (p = 0.252), side (p = 0.190), MM fracture type (p = 0.500), associated fractures (p = 0.470), and follow-up period (p = 0.903) were similar between the groups. At final follow-up examination, AOFAS score (p = 0.191) was similar between groups. Fracture union was achieved in all cases. Grade of posttraumatic osteoarthritis, according to KL, was equally distributed in both groups (p = 0.074). No deep infection or osteomyelitis was seen. Five patients in the titanium screw group underwent implant removal, due to pain in three of them and difficulty in wearing shoes in the other two (p = 0.031). Implant removal was performed after a mean of 14.2 ± 3.1 months (12–19 months).

Conclusions

Bioabsorbable Mg and titanium screws had similar therapeutic efficacy in MM fracture fixation regarding functional and radiological outcomes. However, the rate of implant removal was higher with titanium screws. Bioabsorbable Mg screws may be a favorable fixation option since secondary implant removal procedures can be prevented.

Level of evidence

Level IV, Retrospective case series.

Medial malleolus: Operative Or Non-operative (MOON) trial protocol - a prospective randomised controlled trial of operative versus non-operative management of associated medial malleolus fractures in unstable fractures of the ankle

BACKGROUND

There are limited data reporting the outcome of patients with non-operatively managed medial malleolus fractures compared to those treated surgically in the presence of fibular stabilisation for unstable fractures of the ankle. Conservative management could result in fewer complications, reduced surgical time and lower cost. The purpose of this study is to determine if any difference exists in patient reported and surgical outcomes 1 year after surgery between operative and non-operative treatment of medial malleolar fractures in combination with stabilisation of the lateral malleolus.

METHODS/DESIGN

This is a single-centre, prospective, randomised controlled trial that aims to randomise 154 participants with an unstable ankle fracture to 'non-fixation' (n = 77) or 'fixation' (n = 77) of an associated well-reduced medial malleolus fracture following fibular stabilisation. The study will include patients ≥ 16 years of age with a closed bimalleolar or trimalleolar ankle fracture who are able to consent, complete questionnaires in the English language, and complete follow-up over a 1-year period. Randomisation will occur intra-operatively when the medial malleolus fracture is deemed 'well-reduced', with 2 mm or less of fluoroscopic displacement. The technique for fixation of both the medial and lateral malleoli is at the discretion of the operating surgeon. Patient-reported, observer-rated, and radiographic assessments will be collected at baseline and then at the following post-operative assessment points: 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 1 year. Postal questionnaire outcome data will be collected at 3 and 6 months. The primary outcome measure will be the Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) at 1 year following surgery. Secondary outcome measures will include the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), pain, treatment satisfaction, time to return to activity, operative tourniquet time, and complications.

DISCUSSION

There is only one previous randomised trial comparing non-fixation with fixation of associated medial malleolus fractures but that was limited by the lack of baseline patient-reported outcome data and an inferior sample size. This current prospective trial aims to provide high-quality evidence regarding the requirement for medial malleolar fixation in unstable ankle fractures.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03362229 . Registered retrospectively on 5 December 2017.

Treatment of a Scientifically Neglected Ankle Injury: The Isolated Medial Malleolar Fracture. A Systematic Review

Isolated medial malleolar fractures are frequently encountered injuries. Literature regarding their treatment, though, is scarce and contradicting. The aim of this systematic review is to compare surgical and conservative treatment of isolated medial malleolar fractures considering complication rates and functional outcomes. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL were searched for this review. Articles from 1980 or later, written in English, French, German, or Dutch, reporting any outcome of 10 or more isolated medial malleolar fractures in skeletally mature patients were included. Study quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non Randomized Studies (MINORS) instrument. Eighteen studies were included involving 2566 isolated medial malleolar fractures, which showed a mean (± SD) MINORS score of 8 ± 2. Mean nonunion rate was 1.7% after surgical treatment and 3.5% after conservative treatment. Overall, comparable functional outcomes were found after both treatment methods. Only 2 of the included studies reported the exact amount of fracture displacement. One study-comparing surgical and conservative treatment-showed similar functional outcomes for 1- and 2-mm displaced isolated medial malleolar fractures, and the other, a nonunion rate of 3.5% and a good mean functional outcome in 57 conservatively treated isolated medial malleolar fractures with a mean displacement of 3.8 mm. The available evidence is scarce and of low quality but suggests that conservative treatment of isolated medial malleolar fractures displaced ≤2 mm is safe. No study exists that compares surgical and conservative treatment in isolated medial malleolar fractures displaced >2 mm. Therefore, further research is needed. Until then, the eventual choice of treatment for isolated medial malleolar fractures displaced >2 mm, might be mainly dependent on the patients' characteristics and demands.

Patient-reported functional outcomes and health-related quality of life following fractures of the talus

INTRODUCTION

The primary aim of this study was to investigate patient-reported outcomes following talar fractures. Secondary aims were to investigate health-related quality of life and to determine whether it is influenced by functional outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study identified 56 talar fractures over eight years. Patients were contacted by post and the Olerud and Molander score (OMS), Manchester-Oxford Foot and Ankle scores (MOXFQ) and Euroqol-5D-3L collected.

RESULTS

The mean age was 35.2 years (range 13-78 years). There were four cases (7.1%) of avascular necrosis and one (1.8%) non-union occurred. Data from patient-reported outcome measures were available for 42 patients (75.0%) with a median follow-up of 67.1 months (range 23.2-111.8 months). Mean OMS was 60.0 (standard deviation ± 29.51) and median MOXFQ was 30.33 (interquartile range 47.13). Median Euroqol-5D-3L index was 0.74 (interquartile range 0.213) and median Euroqol-5D-3L visual analogue score was 80 (interquartile range 21). Older age, open fractures, multiple injuries and subsequent avascular necrosis were associated with worse patient-reported outcomes (P < 0.05), with older age, avascular necrosis and open fractures found to be independent predictors of poor OMS, and avascular necrosis and open fractures independently predicting MOXFQ score on regression analysis (P < 0.05). Poor self-reported function, measured by OMS and MOXFQ, correlated with worse health-related quality of life as measured by the Euroqol-5D-3L index (OMS: r = 0.764, P < 0.001; MOXFQ: r = 0.824, P < 0.001) and visual analogue score (OMS: r = 0.450, P = 0.003; MOXFQ: r=0.559, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Older age, avascular necrosis and open fractures predict poorer functional outcomes following talar fractures. Patients with worse limb-specific functional outcomes are more likely to have a worse perception of health-related quality of life.

Medial malleolar fractures: current treatment concepts

The medial malleolus, once believed to be the primary stabilizer of the ankle, has been the topic of conflicting clinical and biomechanical data for many decades. Despite the relevant surgical anatomy being understood for almost 40 years, the optimal treatment of medial malleolar fractures remains unclear, whether the injury occurs in isolation or as part of an unstable bi- or trimalleolar fracture configuration. Traditional teaching recommends open reduction and fixation of medial malleolar fractures that are part of an unstable injury. However, there is recent evidence to suggest that nonoperative management of well-reduced fractures may result in equivalent outcomes, but without the morbidity associated with surgery. This review gives an update on the relevant anatomy and classification systems for medial malleolar fractures and an overview of the current literature regarding their management, including surgical approaches and the choice of implants. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:512-521.

To fix or not to fix: a novel approach to the safe management of unstable open medial malleolar fractures

Displaced medial malleolar fractures, either in isolation or as part of an unstable ankle fracture dislocation, are conventionally treated with internal fixation. We outline the case of a 76-year-old man with diabetes presenting with a grossly deformed open ankle fracture and extruded tibia through a large medial wound. Following irrigation, wound debridement and minimally invasive fibular fixation, the medial fracture reduced anatomically. Contrary to traditional teaching, the medial malleolus was left without fixation. The patient mobilised partially weight-bearing, progressing to both clinical and radiographic union by 3 months. Nine months following an injury, he walks unaided, can squat and drive and has no medial pain or instability with an Olerud-Molander Ankle Score of 80/100, indicating a good outcome. This is the first reported case of such unique management in the literature and highlights the potential to treat open medial malleolar fractures safely without fixation, particularly when concerned about the soft tissue envelope.

Adverse Radiographic Outcomes Following Operative Treatment of Medial Malleolar Fractures

BACKGROUND

We initiated a retrospective study on ankle fractures to assess (1) the time needed for fracture union; (2) the incidence of adverse radiographic outcomes (AROs); (3) factors that might lead to AROs; and (4) whether AROs were associated with worse function and higher incidence of post-trauma osteoarthritis (PTOA).

METHODS

From 2007 to 2016, a total of 296 patients (169 women, 127 men; average age, 48.6 years; range, 20-84) were diagnosed with a medial malleolar fracture, whether isolated or in the setting of bi- or trimalleolar fractures, and underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or percutaneous screw fixation (PSF). The interval to fracture union, radiographic outcomes, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score at 6 months postoperatively, and the incidence of PTOA were recorded. Risk factors were identified both in univariate and multivariate analysis. The average follow-up period was 52.0 months (range, 12-118).

RESULTS

The incidence of delayed union, nonunion, and malunion were 20.3%, 3.7%, and 4.4%, respectively. The interval to fracture union was 10.3 ± 6.4 weeks. In the multivariate analysis, the risk factors for AROs were tobacco use, vertical fractures, interposed soft tissue, and fair/poor reduction. Patients with AROs had significantly worse AOFAS score at 6 months postoperatively ( P < .001) and higher incidence of PTOA ( P < .001).

CONCLUSION

AROs of medial malleolar fractures have an underestimated incidence rate and are associated with worse ankle function and higher incidence of PTOA. Risk factors including tobacco use, vertical fractures, interposed soft tissue, poor/fair reduction should be prudently taken into consideration when treating medial malleolar fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Fixation of medial malleolar fractures with magnesium bioabsorbable headless compression screws: short-term clinical and radiological outcomes in eleven patients

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the outcome of medial malleolar fractures treated with magnesium (MgYREZr) bioabsorbable compression screw fixation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eleven patients with a medial malleolar fracture (either isolated or accompanied by bimalleolar or trimalleolar ankle fractures) who were treated with magnesium bioabsorbable compression screws between 2015 and 2016 in our hospital were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were monitored with a mean follow-up of 17.3 ± 4.1 months (range 12-24 months). The mechanism of injury was ground level falls in all patients. All fractures were classified as closed fractures. American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society's (AOFAS) scale and the visual analog scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the clinical results during the final follow-up. Bone union and a possible loss of reduction were assessed with serial radiographs. Potential complications including revision surgery and infection were recorded and reported.

RESULTS

There were 11 patients (4 female, 7 male) with a mean age of 41 ± 21.9 years (range 20-78 years). Six patients had Herscovici type C and five patients had type B fractures. At the final follow-up the mean AOFAS score was 94.9 ± 5.7 points (range 85-100 points) and the mean VAS score was 0.4 ± 1.2 points (range 0-4 points). Radiographic solid union was achieved in all cases. No complications were seen during the follow-up. No patients required implant removal or revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study that investigates the use of bioabsorbable magnesium compression screws in medial malleolar fractures. The results of this study revealed that fixation of medial malleolar fractures with bioabsorbable magnesium compression screws provides adequate fixation with good functional results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic, retrospective case series.