Donor-recipient sex mismatch in kidney transplantation

Outcomes of Deceased Donor Kidney Recipients From the Same Donor Based on Donor-Recipient Sex Discordance

INTRODUCTION

Outcomes of deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT) recipients from the same donor with donor-recipient sex discordance have been studied with inconsistent results.

METHODS

Adult DDKT where both kidneys from the same donor occurred at our center in two different recipients of different sexes were included. Outcomes were analyzed separately for male and female donors, based on the concordance or discordance between donor-recipient sex: Male-male (M-m) versus Male to female (M-f) or vice versa, F-f versus F-m. Acute rejection (AR) and uncensored graft failure were primary outcomes of interest. The univariate and multivariate risks for AR and graft failure were conducted using the Cox proportional hazards model and log-rank tests.

RESULTS

A total of 130 donors, 84 male and 46 female fulfilled our selection criteria and were transplanted in 260 recipients. With respect to the concordant groups (M-m or F-f), sex discordance was not significantly associated with the risk of rejection in multivariate analysis (M-f vs. M-m HR 1.15 [0.53-2.53, P = 0.72]; F-m vs. F-f HR 1.77 [0.71-4.39, P = 0.23]). Sex discordance was also not significantly associated with graft failure in multivariate analysis. Interestingly, risk factors for AR differed among male donors and female donors. The higher calculated panel reactive antibodies (cPRA) and nonwhite recipients were at increased risk for AR in F-m, but not in M-f.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor-recipient sex discordance was not significantly associated with AR or graft failure. Risk factors for AR may differ across male and female donors.

Immunologic Outcomes in Cross-Sex Solid Organ Transplants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Inform Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation

BACKGROUND

Of nearly 90 hand and 50 face transplant recipients, only five have received a cross-sex vascularized composite allotransplantation (CS-VCA). CS-VCA has the potential to expand the donor pool and has been proven anatomically feasible and ethically acceptable in previous studies. However, there is a lack of immunologic data. This study evaluated the immunologic feasibility of CS-VCA through analysis of the solid organ transplant literature, given the paucity of CS-VCA data. The authors hypothesize that rates of acute rejection (AR) and graft survival (GS) in CS versus same-sex (SS) solid organ transplantation are similar.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Studies comparing GS or AR episodes in CS and SS adult kidney (KT) and liver transplant (LT) populations were included. Odds ratios were calculated for overall GS and AR for all SS and CS transplant combinations [male-to-female (MTF), female-to-male, and overall].

RESULTS

A total of 693 articles were initially identified with 25 included in the meta-analysis. No significant difference in GS was noted between SS-KT versus CS-KT [OR, 1.04 (95% CI, 1.00 to 1.07); P = 0.07), SS-KT versus MTF-KT [OR, 0.97 (95% CI, 0.90 to 1.04); P = 0.41), and SS-LT versus MTF-LT [OR, 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91 to 1.00); P = 0.05). No significant difference in AR was noted between SS-KT versus MTF-KT [OR, 0.99 (95% CI, 0.96 to 1.02); P = 0.57), SS-LT versus CS-LT [OR, 0.78 (95% CI, 0.53 to 1.16); P = 0.22], or SS-LT versus female-to-male LT [OR, 1.03 (95% CI, 0.95 to 1.12); P = 0.47]. For the remaining pairings, GS was significantly increased and AR was significantly decreased in the SS transplants.

CONCLUSIONS

Published data suggest immunologic feasibility of CS-KT and CS-LT with the potential for generalization to the VCA population.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

In theory, CS-VCA could expand the potential donor pool, ultimately leading to decreased wait times for recipients and improve the likelihood of establishing a immunologically favorable donor-recipient match.

Influence of donor sex and age on graft outcome in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

There is a known recipient sex-dependent association between donor sex and kidney transplant survival. We hypothesized that donor age also modifies the association between donor sex and graft survival.

METHODS

First, deceased donor kidney transplant recipients (1988-2019, n = 461 364) recorded in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry and the Collaborative Transplant Study were analyzed. We used multivariable Cox regression models to estimate the association between donor sex and death censored graft loss, accounting for the modifying effects of recipient sex and donor age; donor age was categorized as 5-19, 20-34, 35-49, 50-59 and ≥60 years. Results from cohort-specific Cox models were combined using individual patient data meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Among female recipients of donors aged <60 years, graft loss hazards did not differ by donor sex; recipients of female donors ≥60 years showed significantly lower graft loss hazards than recipients of male donors of the same age [combined adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.90, 95% CI 0.86-0.94]. Among male recipients, female donors aged <50 years were associated with significantly higher graft loss hazards than same-aged male donors (5-19 years: aHR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.21; 20-34 years: aHR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.15; 35-49 years: aHR 1.07, 95% CI 1.04-1.10). There were no significant differences in graft loss by donor sex among male recipients of donors aged ≥50 years.

CONCLUSION

Donor age modifies the association between donor sex and graft survival. Older female donors were associated with similar or lower hazards of graft failure than older male donors in both male and female recipients, suggesting a better functional reserve of older female donor kidneys.

Access to treatment in chronic kidney disease, dialysis and transplantation. Is there gender equality?

Sex and gender are often used as synonyms. However, while sex describes only a biological state, gender is a dynamic concept that takes into account psychosocial and cultural aspects of human existence that can change according to place and time. Inequality in medicine has been described in several areas. Among them, gender inequality has been disregarded for many years and is now a matter of concern. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a growing epidemic worldwide, affecting approximately 10% of the population. Although both men and women are affected, gender equality, especially in access to different treatments, is a matter of concern. We decided to investigate gender equality in patients with CKD. To this end, we conducted a literature narrative review to determine whether gender inequalities were found in CKD patients in general and in access to different treatment modalities in particular. A non-language restricted search was performed until November 30th 2022 in PubMed, SciELO, Trip Database, Google Scholar, MEDES y MEDLINE. We also investigated the situation in this regard in our country. We found that CKD is more prevalent in women than men, nevertheless this prevalence decreases along the CKD stages to the point that more men reach end stage kidney disease (ESKD) and dialysis. Access to transplant (ATT) is higher in men than in women although posttransplant survival shows no gender differences. Finally, most series have shown that women are more frequently Kidney transplantation (KT) living donors than men. Results in our country are similar to the published literature with the exception of a higher proportion of men as KT living donors. As in other areas, gender inequality in Nephrology has been largely overlooked. In this review we have highlighted gender differences in CKD patients. Gender inequality in Nephrology exists and needs to be looked upon in order to reach a personalized clinical approach.

Nondirected Living Kidney Donation and Recipient Outcomes in the United States: A 20-Year Review

Introduction

Nondirected donation (NDD) of the kidneys is a growing practice where donors who do not have any genetic or emotional relationship are selected to donate to a wide variety of recipients with a range of selection criteria and decisions which are left up to individual transplant centers.

Methods

We review all adult living kidney donor-recipient (DR) pairs and outcomes from NDDs who were recorded in United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database as code 10 (anonymous) from October 1997 to September 2017 for demographics and outcomes.

Results

A total of 2174 DR pairs were identified. The number of NDDs increased from 18 in 2000 to 256 in 2016. Survival analysis showed higher death-censored-graft survival (DC-GS) when recipient was 20 years or more older than donor followed by recipient-donor within 20 years of age and lowest when donor was 20 years or more older than recipient (P = 0.0114).

Conclusion

Overall, the number of NDDs has increased significantly in the 20-year review period. Transplants from NDDs have excellent long-term outcomes. Better matching of controllable DR factors, such as age and body mass index (BMI), could further improve GS. Further research is needed to incorporate these DR factors into paired kidney donation programs potentially enhancing the utility and beneficence of this invaluable donation.

Sex and Gender Differences in Kidney Transplantation

Sex and gender often are used interchangeably, but are two distinct entities, with sex being the biological attribute and gender including the social, psychological, and cultural aspects of one's identity. Kidney transplantation has been proven to be the best treatment for end-stage kidney disease, improving both quality of life and life-expectancy for most patients. However, gender disparities in access to and outcomes of kidney transplantation remain despite the plethora of evidence showing the advantages of kidney transplantation to our patients. Data have shown that women are less likely to be waitlisted for a kidney transplant and to receive a deceased donor or a living donor kidney. On the other hand, women are more likely than men to become living kidney donors. Although some state the latter is the result of the female gender to nurture and care for loved ones, others believe this observation is because women often are incompatible with their spouse or child because pregnancy is a strong sensitizing event, which stems from the biological rather than the social differences between the sexes. Influence of sex and gender is not limited to access to kidney transplantation, but rather exist in other areas of transplant medicine, such as the difference observed in transplant outcomes between the sexes, variability in immunosuppression metabolism, and even in more contemporary areas such as recent data showing sex-based differences in outcomes of kidney transplant recipients with coronavirus disease-2019, with males having an increased incidence of acute kidney injury and death.

Time to Move on: HLA Matching Should Be Reconsidered in Modern Deceased Donor Kidney Allocation

HLA matching has been the cornerstone of deceased donor kidney allocation policies worldwide but can lead to racial inequity. Although HLA matching has been shown to improve clinical outcomes, the long-term impacts of nonallogenic factors are being increasingly recognized. This has led some transplant programs to include points for nonallogenic factors, for example, age. Our study looks at long-term graft and patient outcomes based on allocation cohorts rather than individual number of HLA mismatches.

The Impact of Recipient Demographics on Outcomes from Living Donor Kidneys: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Aims: Recipient demographics affect outcomes after kidney transplantation. The aim of this study was to assess, for kidneys retrieved from living donors, the effect of recipient sex, ethnicity, and body mass index (BMI) on delayed graft function (DGF) and one-year graft function, incidence of acute rejection (AR), and recipient and graft survivals. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were searched using algorithms through Ovid. Web of Science collection, BIOSIS, CABI, Korean Journal database, Russian Science Citation Index, and SciELO were searched through Web of Science. Cochrane database was also searched. Risk of bias was assessed using the NHBLI tools. Data analysis was performed using Revman 5.4. Mean difference (MD) and risk ratio (RR) were used in analysis. Results: A total of 5129 studies were identified; 24 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analysed. Female recipients were found to have a significantly lower serum creatinine 1-year-post renal transplantation (MD: −0.24 mg/dL 95%CI: −0.18 to −0.29 p < 0.01) compared to male recipients. No significant difference in survival between male and female recipients nor between Caucasians and Africans was observed (p = 0.08). However, Caucasian recipients had a higher 1-year graft survival compared to African recipients (95% CI 0.52−0.98) with also a lower incidence of DGF (RR = 0.63 p < 0.01) and AR (RR = 0.55 p < 0.01). Recipient obesity (BMI > 30) was found to have no effect on 1-year recipient (p = 0.28) and graft survival (p = 0.93) compared to non-obese recipients although non-obese recipients had a lower rate of DGF (RR = 0.65 p < 0.01) and AR (RR = 0.81 p < 0.01) compared to obese recipients. Conclusions: Gender mismatch between male recipients and female donors has negative impact on graft survival. African ethnicity and obesity do not to influence recipient and graft survival but negatively affect DGF and AR rates.

Recipient sex and estradiol levels affect transplant outcomes in an age-specific fashion

Sex-specific influences have been shown for a variety of diseases. Whether donor or recipient sex and sex hormone levels impact alloimmune responses remains unclear. In unifactorial and multifactorial analyses of more than 400 000 SRTR listed kidney transplant patients, we found that younger female recipients had an inferior death-censored graft survival that was independent of donor sex. In contrast, graft survival was superior in older female recipients, suggesting the impact of recipient sex hormones over chromosomal sex mismatches. Those clinical changes were delineated in experimental skin and heart transplant models showing a prolongation of graft survival in ovariectomized young female recipients. In contrast, graft survival was comparable in ovariectomized and naïve old female recipients. Young ovariectomized mice showed reduced amounts and a compromised T cell proliferation. Deprivation of female hormones dampened the production of interferon (IFN)-γ and interleukin (IL)-17+ by CD4+ T cells while augmenting systemic counts of Tregs. Increasing estradiol concentrations in vitro promoted the switch of naïve CD4+ T cells into Th1 cells; high physiological estradiol concentrations dampening Th1 responses, promoted Tregs, and prolonged graft survival. Thus, clinical observations demonstrate age-specific graft survival patterns in female recipients. Estrogen levels, in turn, impact the fate of T cell subsets, providing relevant and novel information on age- and sex-specific alloimmunity.

Differences in Heart Graft Survival by Recipient Sex

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

We aimed to characterize patterns of differences in heart graft failure rates by recipient sex, accounting for modifying effects of donor sex and recipient age.

Sex Differences in Renal Function: Participation of Gonadal Hormones and Prolactin

Kidney pathophysiology is influenced by gender. Evidence suggests that kidney damage is more severe in males than in females and that sexual hormones contribute to this. Elevated prolactin concentration is common in renal impairment patients and is associated with an unfavorable prognosis. However, PRL is involved in the osmoregulatory process and promotes endothelial proliferation, dilatation, and permeability in blood vessels. Several proteinases cleavage its structure, forming vasoinhibins. These fragments have antagonistic PRL effects on endothelium and might be associated with renal endothelial dysfunction, but its role in the kidneys has not been enough investigated. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to describe the influence of sexual dimorphism and gonadal hormones on kidney damage, emphasizing the role of the hormone prolactin and its cleavage products, the vasoinhibins.

Differences in Liver Graft Survival by Recipient Sex

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

We aimed to characterize patterns of differences in liver graft failure rates by recipient sex, accounting for the modifying effects of donor sex and recipient age.

Donor-recipient Sex Differences Do Not Affect Survival Outcomes After Kidney Transplantation: A Population Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Donor factors can influence decision making for organ utilization for potential kidney transplant candidates. Prior studies exploring the effect of donor-recipient sex matching on kidney transplant outcomes have reported heterogenous and conflicting results. The aim of this contemporary population-cohort analysis was to explore the effect of donor-recipient sex matching on kidney transplant outcomes in the United Kingdom.

METHODS

In this retrospective, observational study, we analyzed all patients receiving kidney-alone transplants between 2003 and 2018 using UK Transplant Registry data. Stratified by recipient sex, outcomes were compared between male and female donors with univariable/multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

Data were analyzed for 25 140 recipients. Of these, 13 414 (53.4%) of kidneys were from male donors and 15 690 (62.4%) of recipients were male. The odds of initial graft dysfunction (delayed graft function/primary nonfunction) were significantly lower for female donor kidneys transplanted into both male (adjusted odds ratio = 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.80-0.98, P = 0.019) and female (adjusted odds ratio = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.71-0.93, P = 0.003) recipients. Male recipients of female donor kidneys had creatinine levels at 1 year that were 6.3% higher (95% CI = 4.8%-7.7%, P < 0.001) than male recipients of male donor kidneys, with a similar sex difference of 4.1% (95% CI = 2.1%-6.1%, P < 0.001) observed within female recipients. However, neither patient nor graft survival was found to differ significantly by donor sex on either univariable or multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data provide contemporary data on sex mismatch for recipient counseling and reassurance with regards to equivalent long-term clinical outcomes based upon donor sex.

Non-HLA Abs in Solid Organ Transplantation

The role of anti-HLA antibodies in solid organ rejection is well established and these antibodies are routinely monitored both in patients in the waiting list and in the post-transplant setting. More recently, the presence of other antibodies directed towards non-HLA antigens, or the so-called minor histocompatibility antigens, has drawn the attention of the transplant community; however, their possible involvement in the graft outcome remains uncertain. These antibodies have been described to possibly have a role in rejection and allograft failure. This review focuses on the most studied non-HLA antibodies and their association with different clinical outcomes considered in solid organ transplantation with the aim of clarifying their clinical implication and potential relevance for routine testing.

Impact of Combinations of Donor and Recipient Ages and Other Factors on Kidney Graft Outcomes

As the availability of kidneys for transplantation continues to be outpaced by its growing demand, there has been an increasing utilization of older deceased donors in the last decades. Considering that definition of factors that influence deceased donor kidney transplant outcomes is important for allocation policies, as well as for individualization of post-transplant care, the purpose of this study was determine the risks for death censored graft survival and for patient survival conferred by older age of the donor in the context of the age of the recipient and of risk factors for graft and/or patient survival. The investigation was conducted in a single-center cohort of 5,359 consecutive first kidney transplants with adult deceased donors performed on non-prioritized adult recipients from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2017. Death censored graft survival and patient survival were lower in older donors, whereas graft survival was higher and patient survival was lower in old recipients. The analyses of combinations of donor and recipient ages showed that death censored graft survival was lower in younger recipients in transplants from 18 to 59-year old donors, with standard or extended criteria, but no difference in graft survival was observed between younger and older recipients when the donor was ≥ 60-year old. Patient survival was higher in younger recipients in transplants with younger or older donors. Two to six HLA-A,B,DR mismatches, when compared to 0-1 MM, conferred risk for death-censored graft survival only in transplants from younger donors to younger recipients. Pre-transplant diabetes conferred risk for patient survival only in 50–59-year old recipients, irrespectively, of the age of the donor. Time on dialysis ≥ 10 years was a risk factor for patient survival in transplants with all donor-recipient age combinations, except in recipients with ≥ 60 years that received a kidney from an 18–49-year old donor. In conclusion, the results obtained in this study underline the importance of analyzing the impact of the age of the donor taking into consideration different scenarios.

Equally Interchangeable? How Sex and Gender Affect Transplantation

Organ transplantation as an option to overcome end-stage diseases is common in countries with advanced healthcare systems and is increasingly provided in emerging and developing countries. A review of the literature points to sex- and gender-based inequity in the field with differences reported at each step of the transplant process, including access to a transplantation waiting list, access to transplantation once waitlisted, as well as outcome after transplantation. In this review, we summarize the data regarding sex- and gender-based disparity in adult and pediatric kidney, liver, lung, heart, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and argue that there are not only biological but also psychological and socioeconomic issues that contribute to disparity in the outcome, as well as an inequitable access to transplantation for women and girls. Because the demand for organs has always exceeded the supply, the transplant community has long recognized the need to ensure equity and efficiency of the organ allocation system. In the spirit of equity and equality, the authors call for recognition of these inequities and the development of policies that have the potential to ensure that girls and women have equitable access to transplantation.

Sex matching does not impact the outcome after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

Background

Several studies in solid organ transplantation have shown a correlation between donor and recipient sex mismatch and risk of graft loss. In this study, we aimed to analyze the impact of donor and recipient sex matching on patient and pancreas graft survival in a large single‐center cohort.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed all first simultaneous pancreas‐kidney transplants performed between 1979 and 2017 at the Medical University of Innsbruck.

Results

Of 452 patients, 54.6% (247) received a sex‐matched transplant. Patient survival (P = .86), death‐censored pancreas graft survival (dcPGS, P = .26), and death‐censored kidney graft survival (dcKGS, P = .24) were similar between the sex‐matched and sex‐mismatched groups. Patient survival and dcPGS at 1, 5, and 15 years were 95.9%, 90.0%, and 62.1% and 86.1%, 77.1%, and 56.7% in the sex‐matched group and 93.6%, 86.2%, and 62.4% and 83.1%, 73.3%, and 54.3% in the sex‐mismatched group. Sex matching led to a lower odds of severe postoperative complications (41.2% vs 49.0%; OR 0.57, 95%CI 0.33‐0.97; P = .038); however, no increased odds of other adverse postoperative outcomes was detected.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that sex matching reduced the odds of postoperative complications but did not impact other early and late outcome parameters in our cohort.

Modeling Long-Term Graft Survival With Time-Varying Covariate Effects: An Application to a Single Kidney Transplant Centre in Johannesburg, South Africa

Objectives: Patients' characteristics that could influence graft survival may also exhibit non-constant effects over time; therefore, violating the important assumption of the Cox proportional hazard (PH) model. We describe the effects of covariates on the hazard of graft failure in the presence of long follow-ups.

Study Design and Settings: We studied 915 adult patients that received kidney transplant between 1984 and 2000, using Cox PH, a variation of the Aalen additive hazard and Accelerated failure time (AFT) models. Selection of important predictors was based on the purposeful method of variable selection.

Results: Out of 915 patients under study, 43% had graft failure by the end of the study. The graft survival rate is 81, 66, and 50% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Our models indicate that donor type, recipient age, donor-recipient gender match, delayed graft function, diabetes and recipient ethnicity are significant predictors of graft survival. However, only the recipient age and donor-recipient gender match exhibit constant effects in the models.

Conclusion: Conclusion made about predictors of graft survival in the Cox PH model without adequate assessment of the model fit could over-estimate significant effects. The additive hazard and AFT models offer more flexibility in understanding covariates with non-constant effects on graft survival. Our results suggest that the period of follow-up in this study is long to support the proportionality assumption. Modeling graft survival at different time points may restrain the possibility of important covariates showing time-variant effects in the Cox PH model.

Effect of recipient-donor sex and weight mismatch on graft survival after deceased donor renal transplantation

This study evaluated the combined effect of recipient-to-donor weight and sex mismatch after deceased-donor renal transplantation in a German transplant cohort and the evolution of recipient-to-donor weight difference over a 13-year observation period. The association of absolute weight and sex difference with graft failure was explored in an outpatient cohort of deceased-donor transplant recipients who underwent kidney transplantation between 2000 and 2012. Graft failure was defined as repeated need for dialysis or death with a functioning graft. Recipient and donor sex pairings were classified as sex concordant (MDMR/FDFR) or discordant (MDFR/FDMR). These classes were further stratified into four groups according to recipient-to-donor weight mismatch ≥10 kg (recipient > donor) or <10 kg (recipient < donor). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were applied to evaluate the time to graft loss adjusting for donor, immunologic, surgical, organizational, and recipient predictors. Sex-concordant transplant pairings <10 kg weight difference served as the reference group. Among 826 transplant recipients, 154 developed graft failure (18.6%). Median graft survival time was 3.9 years; first quartile (0.2-1.2), second quartile (1.2-2.9), third quartile (2.9-5.8), and fourth quartile (5.8-12.4). After multivariable adjustment, the highest relative hazard for graft failure was observed for sex-discordant transplant pairings with a ≥10 kg weight difference between recipient and donor (compared to the reference group MDMR/FDFR with weight difference <10 kg, MDMR/FDFR with weight difference ≥10 kg, hazard ratio 1.86, 95% confidence interval 1.07-3.32-p = 0.029; MDFR/FDMR with weight difference <10 kg, hazard ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 0.78-1.68-p = 0.507, and MDFR/FDMR with weight difference ≥10 kg, hazard ratio 2.00, 95% confidence interval 1.15-3.48-p = 0.014). A recipient-to-donor weight mismatch of ≥10 kg was associated with an increased risk of graft loss or recipient death with a functioning graft. Concurrent sex discordance seemed to enhance this effect as indicated by an increase in the hazard ratio. We detected no significant tendency for increasing recipient-to-donor weight differences from 2000 to 2012.

Gender Differences in Kidney Transplantation – 10-Year Retrospective Study

Background: Chronic kidney disease represents a world-wide health problem affecting approximately 195 million women around the world. Risk of development of chronic kidney disease is greater in women; therefore, the World Kidney Day 2018 was dedicated to kidney disease, treatment options, and its specifics in female patients.

Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analysed a cohort of 1,457 patients after kidney transplantation from all transplant centres in Slovakia over a period of ten years from 2005 – 2015.The parameters taken into account were cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), outcome of transplantation in a context of differences between the genders.

Results: During the ten-year period there were 557 transplanted women vs. 900 men. Among female recipient the dominant cause of ESRD was tubulointerstitial nephritis (males 22.3% vs. females 32.1%, p < 0.0001), other causes of ESRD where females were significantly more represented than men included polycystic kidney disease (males 11.6% vs. females 17.6%, p = 0.0013) and systemic lupus erythematosus (males 0.2% vs. females 2.3 %, p = 0.0001). There was no significant difference in 12-month, 5-year, and 10-year both graft and patient survival rates between men and women. Female recipients wait for kidney transplantation significantly longer in spite of comparable time spent on dialysis (males 32.9 months vs. females 39.4 months, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Despite comparable patient and graft survival rates in male and female recipients in our study there are other studies showing that gender as well as gender mismatch significantly influence the outcomes of transplantation.

The Impact of Sex on Alloimmunity

Transplantation outcomes are known to be affected by multiple factors, including donor and recipient sex. Aside from the physiological characteristics of male and female donor allografts, accumulating evidence suggests that additional features underlie sex-specific immune responses that affect graft survival. We discuss here aspects of innate and adaptive alloimmunity that are specific to males and females in the context of underlying genetic and hormonal factors. These differences likely contribute to the observed disparities in graft survival. Understanding these features in more detail may lead to improved strategies for optimizing the results of organ transplantation.

Graft Growth and Podocyte Dedifferentiation in Donor-Recipient Size Mismatch Kidney Transplants

Background

Kidney transplantation is the treatment choice for patients with end-stage renal diseases. Because of good long-term outcome, pediatric kidney grafts are also accepted for transplantation in adult recipients despite a significant mismatch in body size and age between donor and recipient. These grafts show a remarkable ability of adaptation to the recipient body and increase in size in a very short period, presumably as an adaptation to hyperfiltration.

Methods

We investigated renal graft growth as well as glomerular proliferation and differentiation markers Kiel-67, paired box gene 2 and Wilms tumor protein (WT1) expression in control biopsies from different transplant constellations: infant donor for infant recipient, infant donor for child recipient, infant donor for adult recipient, child donor for child recipient, child donor for adult recipient, and adult donor for an adult recipient.

Results

We detected a significant increase in kidney graft size after transplantation in all conditions with a body size mismatch, which was most prominent when an infant donated for a child. Podocyte WT1 expression was comparable in different transplant conditions, whereas a significant increase in WT1 expression could be detected in parietal epithelial cells, when a kidney graft from a child was transplanted into an adult. In kidney grafts that were relatively small for the recipients, we could detect reexpression of podocyte paired box gene 2. Moreover, the proliferation marker Kiel-67 was expressed in glomerular cells in grafts that increased in size after transplantation.

Conclusions

Kidney grafts rapidly adapt to the recipient size after transplantation if they are transplanted in a body size mismatch constellation. The increase in transplant size is accompanied by an upregulation of proliferation and dedifferentiation markers in podocytes. The different examined conditions exclude hormonal factors as the key trigger for this growth so that most likely hyperfiltration is the key trigger inducing the rapid growth response.

A Kidney Graft Survival Calculator that Accounts for Mismatches in Age, Sex, HLA, and Body Size

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Outcomes for transplants from living unrelated donors are of particular interest in kidney paired donation (KPD) programs where exchanges can be arranged between incompatible donor-recipient pairs or chains created from nondirected/altruistic donors.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data, we analyzed 232,705 recipients of kidney-alone transplants from 1998 to 2012. Graft failure rates were estimated using Cox models for recipients of kidney transplants from living unrelated, living related, and deceased donors. Models were adjusted for year of transplant and donor and recipient characteristics, with particular attention to mismatches in age, sex, human leukocyte antigens (HLA), body size, and weight.

RESULTS

The dependence of graft failure on increasing donor age was less pronounced for living-donor than for deceased-donor transplants. Male donor-to-male recipient transplants had lower graft failure, particularly better than female to male (5%-13% lower risk). HLA mismatch was important in all donor types. Obesity of both the recipient (8%-18% higher risk) and donor (5%-11% higher risk) was associated with higher graft loss, as were donor-recipient weight ratios of <75%, compared with transplants where both parties were of similar weight (9%-12% higher risk). These models are used to create a calculator of estimated graft survival for living donors.

CONCLUSIONS

This calculator provides useful information to donors, candidates, and physicians of estimated outcomes and potentially in allowing candidates to choose among several living donors. It may also help inform candidates with compatible donors on the advisability of joining a KPD program.

Association of Sex with Risk of Kidney Graft Failure Differs by Age

Prior studies of sex differences in kidney graft survival showed conflicting results. We hypothesized that the association between recipient sex and kidney graft failure risk differs by recipient age and donor sex. We evaluated 159,417 patients recorded in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database who received a first deceased-donor kidney transplant (1995-2013). We used time-varying Cox models to estimate the association between recipient sex and death-censored graft failure. Models, stratified on donor sex and adjusted for potential confounders, included a recipient sex by current age interaction term. Among recipients of male donors, females of all ages had significantly higher graft failure risks than males (adjusted hazard ratios 0-14 years: 1.51 [95% confidence intervals 1.19 to 1.90]; 15-24 years: 1.37 [1.18 to 1.59]; 25-44 years: 1.14 [1.03 to 1.26]; 45 years: 1.05 [1.01 to 1.09]). Among recipients of female-donor grafts, only female recipients aged 15-24 years had a significantly higher graft failure risk than their male counterparts had (1.28 [1.06 to 1.53]). Indeed, female recipients aged ≥45 years had a significantly lower graft failure risk than their male counterparts had (0.95 [0.91 to 0.99]). These observations might be explained by the combined influence of several factors, including recognition of sex-determined minor histocompatibility antigens, influence of sex hormones on immune activation, sex- and age-related differences in medication adherence, and sex-related differences in body size. Additional studies should determine whether sex- and age-specific immunosuppression strategies are warranted for kidney graft recipients.

Donor-Recipient Weight and Sex Mismatch and the Risk of Graft Loss in Renal Transplantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Relatively smaller kidney donor to recipient size is proposed to result in higher graft loss due to nephron underdosing and hyperfiltration injury, but the potentially additive effect of sex and weight mismatch has not been explored in detail. The purpose of this study was to determine if concurrent donor and recipient absolute weight and sex mismatch was associated with graft loss in a cohort of deceased donor kidney transplant recipients.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

The association of kidney donor and recipient absolute weight and sex difference with death-censored graft loss was explored using a cohort of United States deceased donor recipients between 2000 and 2014 through the Scientific Registry of Transplants Recipients. Donor-recipient sex pairings (male donor-male recipient; female donor-female recipient; male donor-female recipient; female donor-male recipient) were further stratified by donor and recipient absolute weight difference (>30 or 10-30 kg [donorrecipient] or <10 kg [donor=recipient]) resulting in 20 weight and sex pairings. Time to death-censored graft loss for each pairing was evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for donor, immunologic, surgical, and recipient predictors of graft loss compared with the reference group of male donor-male recipients with no weight mismatch (<10 kg difference).

RESULTS

Of 115,124 kidney transplant recipients, 21,261 developed death-censored graft failure (median graft survival time was 3.8 years; quartile 1 to 3, 0.0 to 14.8 years). After multivariable adjustment, the highest relative hazards for graft failure were observed for female recipients of male donor kidneys and male recipients of female donor kidneys in situations where the recipient was >30 kg larger than donor (hazard ratio, 1.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.32 to 1.70; hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.25 to 1.45, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

A concurrent mismatch in donor-recipient weight (donor Collapse

Key Words

• United States
• female
• graft failure
• graft survival
• kidney
• kidney transplantation
• male
• nephrons
• proportional hazards models
• registries
• sex characteristics
• sex mismatch
• size mismatch
• tissue donors
• transplant recipients

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Adult
• Body Weight
• Cohort Studies
• Female
• Graft Survival
• Humans
• Kidney Transplantation/statistics & numerical data
• Male
• Middle Aged
• Proportional Hazards Models
• Registries
• Risk Factors
• Sex Factors
• Tissue Donors
• Transplant Recipients
• United States

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Amanda J. Miller Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, and
Bryce A. Kiberd Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, and
Ian P. Alwayn Department of General Surgery, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada; and
Ayo Odutayo Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Karthik K. Tennankore Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, and

Collapse

Cancer Incidence among Heart, Kidney, and Liver Transplant Recipients in Taiwan

Population-based evidence of the relative risk of cancer among heart, kidney, and liver transplant recipients from Asia is lacking. The Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database was used to conduct a population-based cohort study of transplant recipients (n = 5396), comprising 801 heart, 2847 kidney, and 1748 liver transplant recipients between 2001 and 2012. Standardized incidence ratios and Cox regression models were used. Compared with the general population, the risk of cancer increased 3.8-fold after heart transplantation, 4.1-fold after kidney transplantation and 4.6-fold after liver transplantation. Cancer occurrence showed considerable variation according to transplanted organs. The most common cancers in all transplant patients were cancers of the head and neck, liver, bladder, and kidney and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Male recipients had an increased risk of cancers of the head and neck and liver, and female kidney recipients had a significant risk of bladder and kidney cancer. The adjusted hazard ratio for any cancer in all recipients was higher in liver transplant recipients compared with that in heart transplant recipients (hazard ratio = 1.5, P = .04). Cancer occurrence varied considerably and posttransplant cancer screening should be performed routinely according to transplanted organ and sex.

Gender in the allocation of organs in kidney transplants: meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To analyze whether gender influence survival results of kidney transplant grafts and patients.

METHODS

Systematic review with meta-analysis of cohort studies available on Medline (PubMed), LILACS, CENTRAL, and Embase databases, including manual searching and in the grey literature. The selection of studies and the collection of data were conducted twice by independent reviewers, and disagreements were settled by a third reviewer. Graft and patient survival rates were evaluated as effectiveness measurements. Meta-analysis was conducted with the Review Manager^® 5.2 software, through the application of a random effects model. Recipient, donor, and donor-recipient gender comparisons were evaluated.

RESULTS

: Twenty-nine studies involving 765,753 patients were included. Regarding graft survival, those from male donors were observed to have longer survival rates as compared to the ones from female donors, only regarding a 10-year follow-up period. Comparison between recipient genders was not found to have significant differences on any evaluated follow-up periods. In the evaluation between donor-recipient genders, male donor-male recipient transplants were favored in a statistically significant way. No statistically significant differences were observed in regards to patient survival for gender comparisons in all follow-up periods evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

The quantitative analysis of the studies suggests that donor or recipient genders, when evaluated isolatedly, do not influence patient or graft survival rates. However, the combination between donor-recipient genders may be a determining factor for graft survival.

Concept and design of a genome-wide association genotyping array tailored for transplantation-specific studies

Background

In addition to HLA genetic incompatibility, non-HLA difference between donor and recipients of transplantation leading to allograft rejection are now becoming evident. We aimed to create a unique genome-wide platform to facilitate genomic research studies in transplant-related studies. We designed a genome-wide genotyping tool based on the most recent human genomic reference datasets, and included customization for known and potentially relevant metabolic and pharmacological loci relevant to transplantation.

Methods

We describe here the design and implementation of a customized genome-wide genotyping array, the ‘TxArray’, comprising approximately 782,000 markers with tailored content for deeper capture of variants across HLA, KIR, pharmacogenomic, and metabolic loci important in transplantation. To test concordance and genotyping quality, we genotyped 85 HapMap samples on the array, including eight trios.

Results

We show low Mendelian error rates and high concordance rates for HapMap samples (average parent-parent-child heritability of 0.997, and concordance of 0.996). We performed genotype imputation across autosomal regions, masking directly genotyped SNPs to assess imputation accuracy and report an accuracy of >0.962 for directly genotyped SNPs. We demonstrate much higher capture of the natural killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) region versus comparable platforms. Overall, we show that the genotyping quality and coverage of the TxArray is very high when compared to reference samples and to other genome-wide genotyping platforms.

Conclusions

We have designed a comprehensive genome-wide genotyping tool which enables accurate association testing and imputation of ungenotyped SNPs, facilitating powerful and cost-effective large-scale genotyping of transplant-related studies.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13073-015-0211-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Transplantation genetics: current status and prospects

Over the last decade, advances in genetic technologies have accelerated our understanding of the genetic diversity across individuals and populations. Case-control and population-based studies have led to several thousand genetic associations across a range of phenotypes and traits being unveiled. Despite widespread and successful use of organ transplantation as a curative therapy for organ failure, genetic research has yet to make a major impact on transplantation practice aside from HLA matching. New studies indicate that non-HLA loci, termed minor histocompatibility antigens (mHAs), may play an important role in graft rejection. With several million common and rare polymorphisms observed between any two unrelated individuals, a number of these polymorphisms represent mHAs, and may underpin transplantation rejection. Genetic variation is also recognized as contributing to clinical outcomes including response to immunosuppressants, introducing the possibility of genotype-guided prescribing in the very near future. This review summarizes existing knowledge of the impact of genetics on transplantation outcomes and therapeutic responses, and highlights the translational potential that new genomic knowledge may bring to this field.

Successful three-way kidney paired donation with compatible pairs to increase donor pool

Despite heightened international interest in performing living donor kidney paired donation (KPD) transplantation after the publication of a research protocol by Ross and colleagues in 1997, only a few hundred have been performed worldwide. The major obstacle is that many individuals in end-stage renal disease are of blood type O and can only receive an organ from a donor of blood type O, whereas blood type O donors are "universal donors" and will be able to donate directly with an intended recipient of any blood type unless there is a positive crossmatch. To overcome this, patients with compatible but non-HLA identical donors over 45 years of age should be approached for inclusion in KPD program especially O blood group donors. Inclusion of all these additional pairs into the algorithm greatly increases chances of possible matches for O blood group recipients. We report successful three-way KPD transplantation resulting in transplantation of O blood group patient using compatible O blood group donor from India. None of the patients had delayed graft function or rejection and all had stable graft function on discharge without any medical and surgical complications. We need to allocate O blood group kidneys from compatible donors to overcome the barrier of HLA, non-HLA antibodies and other donor related factors to improve transplant quality and long term outcomes. This will increase transplantation of O blood group patients.