B-type natriuretic peptide levels in patients with pericardial effusion undergoing pericardiocentesis

Novel Circulating Biomarkers in Aortic Valve Stenosis

The underlying pathophysiology of aortic stenosis and factors affecting its clinical progression remain poorly understood. Apart from B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), novel and emerging biomarkers have been described in association with aortic stenosis, emphasising the potential for these biomarkers to illuminate on yet unknown mechanisms of its pathogenesis. In this review, we aimed to summarise what is known about aortic stenosis biomarkers, highlight the emerging ones, and provide a roadmap for translating these insights into clinical applications. Among the biomarkers studied, lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has emerged as the most promising for risk stratification. Elevated Lp(a) levels are often associated with more rapid aortic stenosis progression. This detrimental effect is attributed to its role in promoting valve calcification. While other emerging biomarkers such as matrix metalloproteinases, monocytes, and metabolites show promises, their specific roles in aortic stenosis pathophysiology remain less clear. This may be due to their relatively recent discovery. Ongoing research aims to elucidate their mechanisms of action.

Cardiac Interventional Procedures in Cardio-Oncology Patients

Comorbidities specific to the cardio-oncology population contribute to the challenges in the interventional management of patients with cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Patients with cancer have generally been excluded from cardiovascular randomized clinical trials. Endovascular procedures may represent a valid option in patients with cancer with a range of CVDs because of their minimally invasive nature. Patients with cancer are less likely to be treated according to societal guidelines because of perceived high risk. This article presents the specific challenges that interventional cardiologists face when caring for patients with cancer and the modern tools to optimize care.

Serum BNP levels are associated with malignant pericardial effusion

Introduction

The development of malignant pericardial effusion indicates a poor prognosis and is the leading cause of cardiac tamponade. The objectives of the study were to examine the levels of BNP in traumatic, malignant and non-malignant pericardial effusion etiologies, and to assess the value of serum and pericardial fluid BNP levels in the prognosis of malignant pericardial effusion.

Methods

A of 56 patients with clinical and echocardiographic diagnosis of pre-tamponade or tamponade who required pericardiocentesis were included in the study. BNP levels were assessed in the serum and within the pericardial fluid. The diagnostic value of BNP levels in discriminating between malignant and non- malignant etiology of pericardial effusion was examined using a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC).

Results

Pericardial fluid BNP levels were similar across all etiology groups. In patients with malignant etiology, the amount of pericardial fluid was high and their serum BNP levels were relatively low. BNP levels were strong predictors of malignant pericardial effusion, and the cut-off point of BNP ≤ 250 pg/ml demonstrated the highest sensitivity (90.0%) for malignant etiology.

Conclusions

Low serum BNP levels were significantly associated with malignancy in patients undergoing pericardiocentesis for pericardial effusions. Serum BNP levels <250 pg/ml may trigger more extensive diagnostic testing for malignant pericardial effusion in patients with small pericardial effusion who are not considered for pericardiocentesis due to small effusion, in whom the etiology is unclear.

Natriuretic peptide B plasma concentration increases in the first 12 h of pulmonary edema recovery

BACKGROUND

According to guidelines, single determination of B-type Natriuretic peptide (BNP) should be used for distinguishing between cardiac and non-cardiac acute dyspnea at the emergency room. BNP measurement is also recommended before hospital discharge in patients hospitalized for heart failure to assess prognosis and to evaluate treatment efficacy. In acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema, BNP is measured using a single BNP determination, but the temporal behavior of BNP during pulmonary edema recovery is unknown.

METHODS

Fifty chronic low ejection fraction (<40%) heart failure patients (age 77 ± 9 years, 17 M-33F) admitted for acute pulmonary edema were studied. Patients were grouped according to 50% dyspnea recovery time into 3 groups: ≤30 min (n = 14), 30 to 60 min (n = 19), and > 60 min (n = 17). BNP was measured at arrival and 4, 8, 12 and 24 h afterwards.

RESULTS

At arrival, BNP was elevated in all patients without significant difference among groups. In the entire population, BNP median and interquartile range value were 791 (528-1327) pg/ml, 785(559-1299) pg/ml, 1014(761-1573) pg/ml, 1049(784-1412) pg/ml, 805(497-1271) pg/ml at arrival and 4, 8, 12 and 24 h afterwards, respectively, showing higher values at 8 and 12 h. This peculiar temporal behavior of BNP was shared by all study groups. Patients with the longest edema resolution showed the highest BNP level 8 and 12 h after admission.

CONCLUSIONS

In acute pulmonary edema, BNP increased up to 12 h after emergency admission regardless of dyspnea recovery time, making BNP quantitative meaning in the acute phase of pulmonary edema uncertain.