Immediate loading for implant restoration compared with early or conventional loading: A meta-analysis

Finite element analysis of welded titanium bar and poly ether ether ketone bar in maxillary full arch splinted interim prosthesis

Full arch fixed provisional restorations are prone to fracture during function for several reasons. Those types of fractures during the healing period eliminate the cross-arch stabilization and disrupt stress distribution patterns. FEA (Finite Element Analysis) study was carried out using edentulous maxillary models where implants and other components were represented in three dimensional (3D) geometric models. Two 3D FEA models with six implants were used. Model TB: the implants were splinted with welded titanium bar; Model PB: the implants were splinted with PEEK (Poly Ether Ether Ketone) bar. An interim full arch PMMA (Poly methyl methacrylate) prosthesis was virtually designed for both models. Both models were subjected to vertical and oblique forces with a single force magnitude of 100 N. The amount of maximum equivalent Von-Mises stresses was calculated at the cervical part of the bone cylinder (marginal bone) and both frameworks. Under bilateral vertical loading, stresses were found to be comparable at the marginal bone between titanium and PEEK splinting. The PEEK framework had better and lower stress distribution than the titanium. While under unilateral oblique forces PEEK had better mechanical response on the marginal bone. And PEEK framework itself showed higher stresses than the titanium. The behavior of PEEK and Titanium splints are comparable under the vertical bilateral load. On the contrary to the oblique load, where the stresses are higher within the PEEK splint that correspondingly transmit less stresses to the underlying structures. So, PEEK was found successful in regards to the pattern of stress distribution to both implants and marginal bone, but further studies are needed to confirm its effectiveness and broader applicability.

Cumulative success rate and marginal bone loss for immediate and early loading protocols in a single implant-supported crown: A randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

New loading protocols with reduced treatment time have gained popularity because of their advantages. However, whether the success rate with immediate loading (IL) is worse than with early loading (EL) is still unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial with a split-mouth design was to evaluate the marginal bone loss and the cumulative success rate (CSR) 1 year after an IL protocol in single implant-supported crowns. The test groups were loaded after less than 24 hours (test group) and EL at 60 days (control group).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventeen participants received 34 implants. The recall appointments were at baseline, 30 days, 60 days, and 1 year. The outcome measures evaluated were pain, implant clinical mobility, probing depth measurements, peri-implant disease, marginal bone loss, implant insertion torque, implant stability quotient (ISQ) value, and the CSR. A 2-way repeated measures ANOVA identified the significant differences for probing depth and ISQ. A 3-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by a pairwise t test analyzed marginal bone loss, and a nonparametric Wilcoxon test analyzed insertion torque (α=.05).

RESULTS

No differences were found between the insertion torque, ISQ, and marginal bone loss values (P>.05). When analyzing probing depth, no differences were found when comparing IL versus EL at baseline, 30 days, and 1 year (P>.05). The global CSR was 91.17%, 88.23% for the IL group and 94.11% for the EL group.

CONCLUSIONS

When analyzing marginal bone loss, the groups were similar. The global CSR was 91.17%, 88.23% for the IL group, and 94.11% for the EL group.

Innate immune regulation in dental implant osseointegration

PURPOSE

Dental implant osseointegration comprises two types of bone formation-contact and distance osteogenesis-which result in bone formation originating from the implant surface or bone edges, respectively. The physicochemical properties of the implant surface regulate initial contact osteogenesis by directly tuning the osteoprogenitor cells in the peri-implant environment. However, whether these implant surface properties can regulate osteoprogenitor cells distant from the implant remains unclear. Innate immune cells, including neutrophils and macrophages, govern bone metabolism, suggesting their involvement in osseointegration and distance osteogenesis. This narrative review discusses the role of innate immunity in osseointegration and the effects of implant surface properties on distant osteogenesis, focusing on innate immune regulation.

STUDY SELECTION

The role of innate immunity in bone formation and the effects of implant surface properties on innate immune function were reviewed based on clinical, animal, and in vitro studies.

RESULTS

Neutrophils and macrophages are responsible for bone formation during osseointegration, via inflammatory mediators. The microroughness and hydrophilic status of titanium implants have the potential to alleviate this inflammatory response of neutrophils, and induce an anti-inflammatory response in macrophages, to tune both contact and distance osteogenesis through the activation of osteoblasts. Thus, the surface micro-roughness and hydrophilicity of implants can regulate the function of distant osteoprogenitor cells through innate immune cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Surface modification of implants aimed at regulating innate immunity may be useful in promoting further osteogenesis and overcoming the limitations encountered in severe situations, such as early loading protocol application.

Selection criteria for immediate implant placement and immediate loading for single tooth replacement in the maxillary esthetic zone: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to review available evidence for Type 1A (immediate implant placement and immediate loading) of single tooth replacement in the maxillary esthetic zone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An electronic search was conducted utilizing the databases of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane to identify publications reporting on the outcomes of Type 1A for single tooth replacement in the maxillary esthetic zone. The success and survival rates of the included articles were reported, which were further categorized according to the clinical criteria reported in Type 1A. Mean survival rates were univariately compared between risk groups and additionally between studies published before and since 2012 using bias-corrected and study size-weighed bootstrap tests. A study time-correcting meta-analysis was then performed to obtain an overall effect for the study pool.

RESULTS

A total of 3118 publications were identified in the search, with a total of 68 articles included. A mean number of implants per study were 37.2 and mean follow-up was 2.8 years. All the included studies utilizing Type 1A report highly selective inclusion and exclusion criteria. Univariate risk group comparison determined that studies before 2012 report a significantly lower mean survival rate (difference of -1.9 percentage points [PP], 95% CI: [-0.3, -4.0], p = .02), facial gap dimension had an impact on survival rates (+3.1 PP [0.2, 5.3] for width >2 mm, p = .04), as well as presence of endodontic infection (+2.6 PP [0.9, 5.1], p = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Type 1A has a high survival rate in studies reporting strict patient and site selection criteria. Further research is required to assess esthetic and functional success with Type 1A treatments.

Clinical efficacy of anodized dental implants for implant-supported prostheses after different loading protocols: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To summarize the clinical performance of anodized implants connected to different prostheses design after immediate/early (IL) or conventional loading (CL) protocols.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seven databases were surveyed for randomized (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled clinical trials (CCTs). Studies comparing IL vs. CL protocol of anodized implants supporting single crown, fixed partial denture (FPD), full-arch fixed dental prosthesis (FDP), or overdenture were included. Risk-of-bias was evaluated using Cochrane Collaboration tools. Meta-analyses for different follow-up were analyzed, followed by heterogeneity source assessment and GRADE approach. The outcomes included implant survival rate, marginal bone loss (MBL), implant stability quotient (ISQ), probing depth (PD), plaque index (PI), and peri-implantitis prevalence.

RESULTS

From 24 eligible studies, 22 were included for quantitative evaluation. Most RCTs (58%, n = 11) and all the 5 CCTs had high and serious risk-of-bias, respectively. Overall, pooling all prosthesis design, no difference between IL vs. CL protocols was observed for all outcomes (p > .05). However, according to prosthesis type subgroups, CL reduced MBL for full-arch FDP (p < .05). In a point-in-time assessment, with overdenture, although IL presented higher PI (12 months), it showed lower MBL (≥24 months), higher ISQ (3 months), and lower PD (6 and 12 months) (p < .05). Conversely, PD was higher for IL in single crown (3 and 6 months) (p < .05). Regarding MBL, IL demonstrated higher mean difference for full-arch FDP (36 months) and FPD (12 and 36 months) (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of this study, overall, there is no significant difference in the outcomes between IL and CL loading protocols.

Comparison of sandblasted and acid-etched surface implants and new hydrophilic surface implants in the posterior maxilla using a 3-month early-loading protocol: a randomized controlled trial

Objectives

In this prospective randomized controlled trial, we measured the primary and secondary stability of two surface-treated implants placed in the posterior maxilla, applied 3-month loading protocols, and compared and analyzed the short-term outcomes of the implants.

Patients and Methods From June 2018 to June 2019, patients with a residual bone height of 4 mm in the posterior maxilla were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups to place SA implants (Osstem Implants, Korea) in Group A and NH implants (Hiossen, USA) in Group B. Finally, 14 implants placed in 13 patients in Group A and 17 implants placed in 14 patients in Group B were analyzed. The measured primary and secondary stability of each implant was represented by implant stability quotient (ISQ), and treatment outcomes were evaluated.

Results

Group A consisted of patients with an average age of 62.2 years (range, 48-80 years), and Group B consisted of patients with an average age of 58.1 years (range, 35-82 years). Primary stability was 73.86±6.40 and 71.24±5.32 in Groups A and B, respectively (P=0.222). Secondary stability was 79.07±5.21 in Group A and 78.29±4.74 in Group B (P=0.667). A steep increase in ISQ during the healing period was observed in Group B, though it was not significant (P=0.265). The mean follow-up period was 378.5±164.6 days in Group A and 385.3±167.9 days in Group B. All implants in each group met the success criteria, and the success rate was 100%.

Conclusion

Two surface-treated implants placed in the posterior maxilla with greater than 4 mm alveolar bone height exhibited successful one-year treatment outcomes if a primary stability of 65 or higher ISQ was obtained and a 3-month early loading protocol was applied.

Scientometric Analysis of Dental Implant Research over the Past 10 Years and Future Research Trends

BACKGROUND

We conducted a bibliometrics analysis to explore the recent trends in dental implant research which could help researchers have a clear grasp of the relevant research hotspots and prospects. Material and Methods. Altogether, 15,770 articles on dental implants, from January 1, 2010, to October 31, 2019, were selected from the Web of Science Core Collection. We used BICOMB software to extract the high-frequency MeSH terms and construct binary and coword matrices. gCLUTO software was used for biclustering and visual analysis, Ucinet 6 software for social network analysis, SCIMAT software for strategic diagram building, Citespace 5.5 software to form timeline visualization, and VOSviewer software, eventually, for bibliometrics cocitation network.

RESULTS

Altogether, 72 high-frequency keywords were extracted from the selected articles and 4 clusters and 7 subcategories were identified through biclustering analysis in the dental implant research field. The use of the strategic diagram also enabled us to find the research hotspot and development trends.

CONCLUSIONS

The survival rate of dental implants and subsequent restoration have always been the core focus of research. Sinus floor elevation and guided bone regeneration are worthy of constant exploration owing to their reliability. With continuous improvement in technology, immediate loading could become a future research hot spot.

Effect of 2-implant mandibular overdenture with different attachments and loading protocols on peri-implant health and prosthetic complications: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

A systematic review of the effect of different overdenture attachments with different loading protocols on peri-implant health is lacking.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of different overdenture attachments with delayed or immediately loaded 2-implant-retained mandibular overdentures on peri-implant tissue health.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A comprehensive search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library was conducted to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The outcomes were marginal bone loss, probing depth, plaque index, bleeding on probing, implant survival rate, and prosthetic complications. The Bayesian network meta-analysis accompanied by a random effect model and 95% credible intervals was calculated.

RESULTS

Sixteen RCT (n=599 participants receiving 1198 dental implants) were included. Five common overdenture attachment systems with delayed or immediate loading were compared. The difference in marginal bone loss and probing depth was not statistically significant when comparing different overdenture attachments with different loading protocols. The rank probability test showed that bar+ immediate loading ranked highest (63.8%) in terms of marginal bone loss, whereas ball+ delayed loading (73.3%) ranked highest in terms of probing depth. The implant survival rate was 100% for the LOCATOR+ delayed loading, resilient telescopic+ delayed loading, and magnet+ immediate loading; however, bar+ delayed loading, ball+ delayed loading, magnet+ delayed loading, LOCATOR+ immediate loading, ball+ immediate loading, and bar+ immediate loading had survival rates of 99.1%, 98.8%, 96.0%, 94.7%, 93.1%, and 91.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

All types of overdenture attachment with immediate loading or delayed loading had a similar effect on peri-implant health. Bar+ immediate loading was associated with the least marginal bone loss, whereas ball+ delayed loading showed the least probing depth.

Factors Influencing Primary and Secondary Implant Stability—A Retrospective Cohort Study with 582 Implants in 272 Patients

The success rate of dental implants depends on primary and secondary stability. We investigate predictive factors for future risk stratification models. We retrospectively analyze 272 patients with a total of 582 implants. Implant stability is measured with resonance frequency analysis and evaluated based on the implant stability quotient (ISQ). A linear regression model with regression coefficients (reg. coeff.) and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) is applied to assess predictive factors for implant stability. Implant diameter (reg. coeff.: 3.28; 95% CI: 1.89–4.66, p < 0.001), implant length (reg. coeff.: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.26–1.08, p < 0.001), and implant localization (maxillary vs. mandibular, reg. coeff.: −7.45, 95% CI: −8.70–(−6.20), p < 0.001) are significant prognostic factors for primary implant stability. An increase in ISQ between insertion and exposure is significantly correlated with healing time (reg. coeff.: 0.11, 95% CI: 0.04–0.19). Patients with maxillary implants have lower ISQ at insertion but show a higher increase in ISQ after insertion than patients with mandibular implants. We observe positive associations between primary implant stability and implant diameter, implant length, and localization (mandibular vs. maxillary). An increase in implant stability between insertion and exposure is significantly correlated with healing time and is higher for maxillary implants. These predictive factors should be further evaluated in prospective cohort studies to develop future preoperative risk-stratification models.

Immediate versus early non-occlusal loading of dental implants placed flapless in partially edentulous patients: A 10-year randomized clinical trial

AIM

To compare immediate versus early non-occlusal loading of dental implants placed flapless in a 10-year, parallel group, randomized clinical trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive implants for fixed partial dentures. The immediate group was represented by immediate non-occlusal implant loading, whereas the early group was represented by early non-occlusal implant loading. The outcome variables were implant failure, complications, subjective satisfaction and radiographic bone level at implant sites 10 years after loading.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were randomized: 30 to the immediately loaded group and 30 to the early loaded group. Three patients dropped out in the immediate group, and three patients dropped out in the early group. One implant failure occurred in the early group (p = 1.0). Three complications occurred in the immediate group and four in the early group (RR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.19 to 3.04, p = 1.0). The difference in bone level was 0.1 mm (95% CI -0.2 to 0.5, p = .3752) favouring the early group. Difference in subjective functional satisfaction was 0.2 (95% CI -0.2 to 0.7; p = .3271). Difference in subjective aesthetic satisfaction was 0.0 (95% CI -0.4 to 0.4; p = .9656).

CONCLUSION

At 10-year follow-up, no differences between implants loaded immediately and early were detected in this randomized clinical trial.

Effects of immediately static loading on osteointegration and osteogenesis around 3D-printed porous implant: A histological and biomechanical study

The 3D-printed porous implant is capable of achieving favorable osteointegration and osteogenesis in the absence of mechanical stimulation during the early healing period. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of immediately static loading on bone osteointegration and osteogenesis around the 3D-printed porous implant. Thirty porous implants with optimal configuration were installed bilaterally into femurs of 15 rabbits. The Load group on the left side was applied the maximal initial load of 10 N offered by a diminutive and built-in loading device and the Non-load group was on the contralateral side. At 2, 4, and 8 weeks post-operatively, the explants were harvested for push-out test to measure the biological fixation strength. The quantity and quality of new bone were evaluated by the means of histological examination, Micro-CT and bone density analysis. Moreover, the animal data were integrated into finite element models to assess the biomechanics of peri-implant bone. The results indicated that the quantity, quality and biomechanical properties of the new bone increased and optimized along with the healing time. It also demonstrated that the immediately static loading increased the volume of new bone with inferior quality in 2 weeks after implantation and the adverse influence emerged gradually as time extended. Moreover, finite element results demonstrated that the early structures of new bone around porous implant were not suitable for functional loading. This study indicated the mineralization modes of distance osteogenesis and contact osteogenesis around the porous implant. Accordingly, the delay and progressive loading protocol was recommended.

Immediate versus early or conventional loading dental implants with fixed prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Immediate loading of dental implants has gained widespread popularity because of its advantages in shortening treatment duration and improving esthetics and patient acceptance. However, whether immediate loading can achieve clinical outcomes comparable with those of early or conventional delayed loading is still unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of immediate loading versus early or conventional loading implants in patients rehabilitated with fixed prostheses.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Electronic searches of CENTRAL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE were supplemented by manual searches up to October 2018. Only human randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing immediate with early or conventional loading dental implants were included. Quality assessment was performed by using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. For the meta-analysis, the dichotomous and continuous variables were pooled and analyzed by using risk ratios (RRs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs), with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). The outcomes assessed included survival rate, marginal bone level changes, peri-implant gingival level, probing depth, and implant stability. The subgroup analyses included healing methods, implant time, occlusal contact, number of missing teeth, and tooth position.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine trials (49 articles) were included from the initial 763 references evaluated. When compared with conventional loading, with implants regarded as a statistical unit, a statistically significant lower survival rate was observed in the immediate loading dental implant (RR=0.974; 95% CI, 0.954, 0.994; P=.012). Regarding other outcomes, including marginal bone level changes, peri-implant gingival level, probing depth, and implant stability, no statistically significant differences were observed when comparing immediate versus early or conventional loading (P>.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with early loading, immediate loading could achieve comparable implant survival rates and marginal bone level changes. Compared with conventional loading, immediate loading was associated with a higher incidence of implant failure.

Clinical Assessment of Dental Implant Stability During Follow-Up: What Is Actually Measured, and Perspectives

The optimization of loading protocols following dental implant insertion requires setting up patient-specific protocols, customized according to the actual implant osseointegration, measured through quantitative, objective methods. Various devices for the assessment of implant stability as an indirect measure of implant osseointegration have been developed. They are analyzed here, introducing the respective physical models, outlining major advantages and critical aspects, and reporting their clinical performance. A careful discussion of underlying hypotheses is finally reported, as is a suggestion for further development of instrumentation and signal analysis.

Impact of different placement depths on the crestal bone level of immediate versus delayed placed platform-switched implants

PURPOSE

The preservation of peri-implant bone is one requirement for long-term success of dental implants. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of subcrestal placement on the crestal bone level of immediate versus delayed placed implants after loading.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, data of 159 patients who received 330 implants was analyzed. Implants were placed subcrestally, crestally or supracrestally into fresh sockets or healed sites. Vertical bone level height was assessed radiographically and implants were followed up annually. The influence of patient and implant related risk factors for peri-implant bone loss was evaluated using a linear mixed model.

RESULTS

Depth of implant placement was significantly correlated with peri-implant bone loss (P = 0.001, 95% CI). Least effective loss of crestal bone was determined when implants were placed between 1 mm and 1.99 mm subcrestally. Smoking significantly enhanced the risk of peri-implant bone loss (P = 0.04, 95% CI). Immediate implant placement was not positively correlated with peri-implant bone loss (P = 0.51, 95% CI).

CONCLUSION

Within the limits of this study, implant placement 1.08 mm subcrestally may be recommendable in order to avoid supracrestal expositions of platform-switched titanium implants over time.

Effect of the different implant protocols on peri-implant bone: a 6-month prospective study in beagle dogs

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of different implant placement and loading protocols on the marginal bone loss (MBL) in beagles by intraoral radiography.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

61 dental implants were inserted on 9 beagle dogs at bilateral lower posteriors according to 8 different protocols: immediate implant placement and immediate loading for 3 months (IIP + IL3) or 6 months (IIP + IL6) and unloading (IIP + UL), immediate implant placement and delayed loading for 3 months (IIP + DL3) or 6 months (IIP + DL6), delayed implant placement and immediate loading for 3 months (DIP + IL3) or delayed loading for 3 months (DIP + DL3) and unloading (DIP + UL). Intraoral radiography was performed to analyze the MBL during each surgery, before and after the implant placement and at 3-month intervals after the procedure.

RESULTS

In total, 57 samples were included. There was less MBL (p<0.05) in the IIP + IL3 group (1.22 ± 0.63 mm) compared to the DIP + IL3 group (1.89 ± 0.9 mm). The longer the loading time, the more bone loss appeared in the IIP + IL group; however, the results were reversed in the IIP + DL group. The MBL during the latter 3-month period was dramatically decreased compared to the former 3-month period in the IIP + DL3 group (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The IIP + IL group seems superior to the DL protocol and the MBL changed significantly during the first three months and thereafter became stable.

Recent advances in dental implants

Dental implants are a common treatment for the loss of teeth. This paper summarizes current knowledge on implant surfaces, immediate loading versus conventional loading, short implants, sinus lifting, and custom implants using three-dimensional printing. Most of the implant surface modifications showed good osseointegration results. Regarding biomolecular coatings, which have been recently developed and studied, good results were observed in animal experiments. Immediate loading had similar clinical outcomes compared to conventional loading and can be used as a successful treatment because it has the advantage of reducing treatment times and providing early function and aesthetics. Short implants showed similar clinical outcomes compared to standard implants. A variety of sinus augmentation techniques, grafting materials, and alternative techniques, such as tilted implants, zygomatic implants, and short implants, can be used. With the development of new technologies in three-dimension and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) customized implants can be used as an alternative to conventional implant designs. However, there are limitations due to the lack of long-term studies or clinical studies. A long-term clinical trial and a more predictive study are needed.