Excellent results and low complication rate for anatomic polyaxial locking plates in comminuted proximal ulna fractures

Olecranon Fractures: A Critical Analysis Review

»

Olecranon fractures account for 10% of all elbow fractures and are more likely to result from a low-energy injury. A displaced fracture with a stable ulnohumeral joint (Mayo type 2) is the most common type of injury.

»

The management of an isolated olecranon fracture is based on patient factors (age, functional demand, and if medically fit to undergo surgery) and fracture characteristics including displacement, fragmentation, and elbow stability.

»

Nonoperative management can be successfully used in undisplaced fractures (Mayo type 1) and in displaced fractures (Mayo type 2) in frail patients with lower functional demands.

»

Patients with displaced olecranon fractures with a stable ulnohumeral joint without significant articular surface fragmentation (Mayo type 2A) can be managed with tension band wiring, plate osteosynthesis (PO), intramedullary fixation, or suture repair.

»

PO is advocated for multifragmentary fractures and fractures that are associated with ulnohumeral instability. It is essential to consider the variable anatomy of the proximal ulna during surgery.

Long-term outcomes after different types of Horne and Tanzer olecranon fractures

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether the outcomes differ after different Horne and Tanzer types of olecranon fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated 40 men and 55 women with isolated olecranon fractures, journals and radiographs from fracture event. The fractures were classified according to Horne and Tanzer. After a mean 19 years after the fracture events, we evaluated subjective, clinical and radiographic outcomes, using the uninjured arms as controls.

RESULTS

95% of patients with type I fractures reported, at follow-up, no differences between the elbows, 80% with type II fractures and 95% with type III fractures (p = 0.43). The three types of fractures had no differences in elbow range of motion or hand grip strength (when comparing injured and uninjured arms) and the proportions of individuals with radiographic elbow degenerative changes or joint space reduction were no different (all p > 0.05). Individuals with elbow degenerative changes had no inferior subjective elbow function compared to individuals with normal radiographs (p = 0.66), in contrast to those with joint space reduction compared to individuals with normal radiographs (p < 0.001).

INTERPRETATION

All types of Horne and Tanzer olecranon fractures have favourable long-term outcome. Elbow joint space reduction is associated with inferior subjective elbow function while degenerative changes are not.

Olecranon fractures: do they lead to osteoarthritis? Long-term outcomes and complications

PURPOSE

To report radiologic, functional outcomes, and complications with a long-term follow-up in acute olecranon fractures treated with osteosynthesis and, secondly, to determine the predisposing factors to arthritis.

METHODS

Forty-two patients treated with osteosynthesis for acute olecranon fractures were reviewed, with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Radiological and clinical evaluations including DASH, MEPS, active range of motion, pain, arthritis, associated lesions, and complications were recorded. Arthritis was classified according to Broberg-Morrey scale. A logistic regression model was estimated to determine risk factors to develop ulnohumeral arthritis. The association between the types of fractures according to Mayo classification and MEPS, and the association between the type of fracture and the presence of pain were analyzed.

RESULTS

The average follow-up was of 43.64 months. The flexion-extension average range was 135.6°, and the mean MEPS was 89.45; the DASH was 25.26. Eighteen cases (42.86%) were fixed with pre-contoured locking plates, 21 with tension band wiring (50%), and 3 with cannulated screws of 7 mm (7.14%). Six cases (14.29%) needed hardware removal. All fractures healed. Ulnohumeral osteoarthritis was observed in 14 cases (33.3%). We did not find a significant association among the MEPS, pain, and the fracture type, according to Mayo (p > 0.1 for both values). A significant association was found (p < 0.05) between fracture type and the osteoarthritis.

CONCLUSIONS

In olecranon fractures, good functional and radiological results with low complications are predictable. The osteoarthritis is possible in more complex fractures and with other associated fractures.

Can low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis for olecranon fractures reduce implant removal? A retrospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Because of poor soft-tissue coverage at the proximal ulna and prominent posteriorly positioned implants, hardware removal remains the most common reason for revision surgery of olecranon fractures that were operatively treated using plate osteosynthesis. We hypothesized that low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis would reduce the number of soft tissue-related hardware removals compared with single posterior plating whereas the functional results would be comparable.

METHODS

This study retrospectively included patients who were treated with low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis or a posterior 2.7-/3.5-mm locking compression plate (LCP) for isolated olecranon fractures from 3 study centers. In addition to the implant removal rate, functional outcome measures (range of motion; Mayo Elbow Performance Score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score) were statistically compared.

RESULTS

The study included 79 patients, with a mean follow-up period of 36 months (range, 24-77 months). Of these patients, 37 were treated with low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis and 42, with a 2.7-/3.5-mm LCP. The mean age was 57 years (range, 18-93 years). Range of motion after treatment with low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis and a 2.7-/3.5-mm LCP measured 129° (range, 80°-155°) and 139° (range, 100°-155°), respectively. The Mayo Elbow Performance Scores were 95 (range, 65-100) and 99 (range, 85-100), respectively (P = .028), and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores were 5.0 (range, 0-49) and 4.6 (range, 0-28), respectively (P = .673). Hardware was removed in 32% and 50% of patients after treatment with double-plate osteosynthesis and a 2.7-/3.5-mm LCP, respectively (P = .11). Hardware removal owing to soft-tissue irritation was noted in 27% of patients after double-plate osteosynthesis and 38% after LCP treatment (P = .30).

DISCUSSION

Low-profile double-plate osteosynthesis for treating olecranon fractures resulted in good clinical outcomes. However, the rate of hardware removal was not significantly reduced, and the functional results were comparable to those of common single-posterior plate osteosynthesis.

Surgical treatment of the radial head is critical to the outcome of Monteggia-like lesions

Aims

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of Monteggia-like lesions at midterm follow-up and to determine whether the surgical treatment of the radial head influences the clinical and radiological results.

Patients and Methods

A total of 78 patients with a Monteggia-like lesion, including 44 women and 34 men with a mean age of 54.7 years (19 to 80), were available for assessment after a mean 4.6 years (2 to 9.2). The outcome was assessed using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Oxford Elbow Score (OES), Mayo Modified Wrist Score (MMWS), and The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score. Radiographs were analyzed for all patients. A total of 12 Mason type I, 16 type II, and 36 type III fractures were included. Surgical treatment consisted of screw fixation for all type II and reconstructable type III fractures, while radial head arthroplasty (RHA) or excision was performed if reconstruction was not possible.

Results

The mean MEPS was 88.9 (40 to 100), mean OES was 40.1 (25 to 48), mean MMWS was 88.1 (50 to 100), mean DASH score was 14.7 (0 to 60.2), and mean movement was 114° (sd 27) in extension/flexion and 155° (sd 37) in pronation/supination. Mason III fractures, particularly those with an associated coronoid fracture treated with RHA, had a significantly poorer outcome. Suboptimal results were also identified in patients who had degenerative changes or heterotopic ossification on their latest radiograph. In contrast, all patients with successful radial head reconstruction or excision had a good outcome.

Conclusion

Good outcomes can be achieved in Monteggia-like lesions with Mason II and III fractures, when reconstruction is possible. Otherwise, RHA is a reliable option with satisfactory outcomes, especially in patients with ligamenteous instability. Whether the radial head should be excised remains debatable, although good results were achieved in patients with ligamentous stability and in those with complications after RHA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1512–1519

Nailing of proximal ulna fractures: biomechanical comparison of a new locked nail with angular stable plating

PURPOSE

Proximal ulna fractures are common injuries and frequently treated with angular stable plating. This surgical option shows good functional results. Relevant drawbacks such as large soft tissue exposure, compromised blood supply of fracture fragments and disturbing osteosynthetic material are described. The aim of this study was to compare a new locked proximal ulna nail with angular stable plating in a biomechanical testing setup for extraarticular proximal ulna fractures.

METHODS

Ten pairs of sawbones with a Jupiter type IIB proximal ulna fracture (OTA 2U1A3.1) were tested after osteosynthesis with the mentioned implants in a servo-pneumatic testing machine. The testing setup simulates physiological joint motion (0°-90°) under cyclic loading (30-300 N). Primary stability and loosening of both constructs were quantified using micromotion video-analysis after 608 test cycles.

RESULTS

The micromotion analysis showed significantly higher primary stability of the locked nail (0.29 ± 0.13 mm) compared to the angular stable plate (0.97 ± 0.30 mm, p < 0.001). Both implants showed a low amount of loosening after completion of the test cycles. The construct with the locked nail (0.08 ± 0.06 mm) showed significantly lower dislocation of the fragments measured at the anterior cortex (plate 0.24 ± 0.13 mm, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Nailing of proximal ulna fractures shows significantly higher primary stability and lower loosening compared to angular stable plating in our testing setup.