Is Management of Central Retinal Artery Occlusion the Next Frontier in Cerebrovascular Diseases?

Network Meta-Analysis of Different Thrombolytic Strategies for the Treatment of Central Retinal Artery Occlusion

PURPOSE

Intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolytic strategies have been used to treat central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO); however, previous meta-analyses evaluated the efficacy of these two thrombolytic strategies separately but did not compare them. This network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of different thrombolytic methods for treating CRAO.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfangdata to identify relevant studies published before 1 January 2023. We used the "network" command in STATA 14.0 software to perform network meta-analysis. In addition, we calculated the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) to rank all currently available thrombolytic strategies.

RESULTS

We included 12 studies in the final data analysis. Results suggested that, compared with standard treatment (ST), intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IVtPA) (OR, 5.78; 95% CI, 2.07 to 16.11) and intra-arterial urokinase (IAUK) (OR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.10 to 7.02) and intra-arterial tPA (IAtPA) (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.04 to 5.77) achieved better visual improvement. The differences in visual improvement among IVtPA, IAUK, and IAtPA are insignificant. Furthermore, compared with ST, administration of IVtPA within 4.5 hours of CRAO onset (OR, 8.87; 95% CI, 3.35 to 23.48) rather than administration after 4.5 hours of onset (OR, 3.09; 95% CI, 0.81 to 11.70) achieved better visual improvement. In addition, compared to ST, all available thrombolytic strategies we evaluated were associated with a higher risk of adverse events, but these strategies did not differ. Based on the results of SUCRA, IVtPA had the highest ranking probability in visual improvement (91.9%) but had a relatively lower ranking probability of adverse events (60.1%).

CONCLUSION

Both intravenous and intra-arterial thrombolytic strategies are effective for treating CRAO, but SUCRA results show that IVtPA may be the optimal strategy for treating CRAO. Furthermore, based on the results of subgroup analysis, we further speculate that IVtPA injection within 4.5 hours of the onset of CRAO should be the optimal thrombolytic option for treating CRAO. However, due to the limitations of all eligible studies, more studies are still required in the future to validate our findings.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Retinal Artery Occlusion: Nationally Representative Data

Background and Purpose- There are few large studies examining comorbidities, outcomes, and acute interventions for patients with retinal artery occlusion (RAO). RAO shares pathophysiology with acute ischemic stroke (AIS); direct comparison may inform emergent treatment, evaluation, and secondary prevention. Methods- The National Readmissions Database contains data on ≈50% of US hospitalizations from 2013 to 2015. We used International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes to identify and compare index RAO and AIS admissions, comorbidities, and interventions and Clinical Comorbidity Software codes to identify readmissions causes, using survey-weighted methods when possible. Cumulative risk of all-cause readmission after RAO ≤1 year was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results- Among 4871 RAO and 1 239 963 AIS admissions, patients with RAO were less likely (P<0.0001) than patients with AIS to have diabetes mellitus (RAO, 24.3% versus AIS, 36.8%), congestive heart failure (9.1% versus 14.8%), atrial fibrillation (15.5% versus 25.2%), or hypertension (62.2% versus 67.6%) but more likely to have valvular disease (13.3% versus 10.5%) and tobacco usage (38.6% versus 32.9%). In RAO admissions, thrombolysis was administered in 2.9% (5.8% in central RAO subgroup, versus 8.0% of AIS), therapeutic anterior chamber paracentesis in 1.0%, thrombectomy in none; 1.4% received carotid endarterectomy during index admission, 1.6% within 30 days. Nearly 1 in 10 patients with RAO were readmitted within 30 days and were more than twice as likely as patients with AIS to be readmitted for dysrhythmia or endocarditis. Readmission for stroke after RAO was the highest within the first 150 days after index admission, and risk was higher in central RAO than in branch RAO. Conclusions- Patients with RAO had high prevalence of many stroke risk factors, particularly valvular disease and smoking, which can be addressed to minimize subsequent risk. Despite less baseline atrial fibrillation, RAO patients were more likely to be readmitted for atrial fibrillation/dysrhythmias. A variety of interventions was administered. AIS risk is the highest shortly after RAO, emphasizing the importance of urgent, thorough neurovascular evaluation.