Allosteric interactions prime androgen receptor dimerization and activation

Mechanisms of ligand-mediated modulation of mineralocorticoid receptor signaling

The mineralocorticoid receptor plays a central role in homeostasis, mediating the regulation by aldosterone of epithelial sodium transport. In addition, it regulates a range of responses in other tissues where it is likely responding to both mineralocorticoids and glucocorticoids. Structural, functional and evolutionary studies have provided insights into the mechanisms of receptor activation by agonist ligands and how interactions within the domains of the mineralocorticoid receptor may modulate the response to individual ligands including the mechanisms of antagonism. This review will discuss the current understanding, including recent insights into these interactions, with implications for an emerging array of novel non-steroidal compounds targeting the mineralocorticoid receptor; and highlight their relevance to ligand- or tissue-specificity as well as their suitability as therapeutic agents.

Allosteric communications between domains of nuclear receptors

Nuclear receptors (NRs) regulate gene expression in response to hormonal signals, influencing diverse physiological processes and diseases. Structural and dynamics investigations based on X-ray crystallography, cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry, and molecular dynamics simulations, have significantly deepened our understanding of the conformational states, dynamics, and interdomain interactions of multi-domain NRs. Structural studies have examined heterodimeric complexes such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) with retinoid X receptor alpha (RXRα), liver X receptor beta (LXRβ) with RXRα, and retinoic acid receptor beta (RARβ) with RXRα, as well as homodimers like hepatic nuclear factor 4 alpha (HNF-4α), androgen receptor (AR), and glucocorticoid receptor (GR). These investigations highlight critical allosteric communication between ligand-binding domains (LBDs) and DNA-binding domains (DBDs), emphasizing the roles of flexible hinge regions and N-terminal segments in adapting to diverse DNA configurations. Both non-steroid receptor heterodimers and homodimers exhibit robust interdomain connections that mediate allosteric signaling. For instance, AR demonstrates three distinct conformational states that underscore its dynamic behavior, while GR exhibits unique ligand-dependent domain interactions shaping receptor signaling. The collective findings so far suggest a conserved mechanism of cross-domain communication across the NR family. Supported by complementary biophysical, spectroscopic, mutagenesis, and computational studies, this body of research has elucidated the nature of domain-domain interfaces and their pivotal roles in regulating the transcriptional activity of steroid and non-steroid receptors.

Mitoxantrone inhibits and downregulates ER α through binding at the DBD-LBD interface

Targeting the estrogen receptor (ER or ERα) through competitive antagonists, receptor downregulators, or estrogen synthesis inhibition remains the primary therapeutic strategy for luminal breast cancer. We have identified a novel mechanism of ER inhibition by targeting the critical interface between its DNA-binding domain (DBD) and ligand-binding domain (LBD). We demonstrate that mitoxantrone (MTO), a topoisomerase II inhibitor, binds at this previously unexplored DBD-LBD interface. Using comprehensive computational, biophysical, biochemical, and cellular analyses, we show that independent of its DNA damage response activity, MTO binding induces distinct conformational changes in ER, leading to its cytoplasmic redistribution and subsequent proteasomal degradation. Notably, MTO effectively inhibits clinically relevant ER mutations (Y537S and D538G) that confer resistance to current endocrine therapies, outperforming fulvestrant in both in vitro and in vivo assays. Our findings establish domain-domain interaction targeting as a viable therapeutic strategy for ER, with translational implications for other nuclear receptors.

Small-molecule disruption of androgen receptor-dependent chromatin clusters

Sustained androgen receptor (AR) signaling during relapse is a central driver of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Current AR antagonists, such as enzalutamide, fail to provide long-term benefit for the mCRPC patients who have dramatic increases in AR expression. Here, we report AR antagonists with efficacy in AR-overexpressing models. These molecules bind to the ligand-binding domain of the AR, promote AR localization to the nucleus, yet potently and selectively down-regulate AR-target genes. The molecules BG-15a and the pharmacokinetically optimized BG-15n elicit a decrease in cell and tumor growth in vitro and in vivo in models of mCRPC. BG-15a/n treatment causes the collapse of chromatin loops between enhancers and promoters at key genes in the AR-driven epigenome. AR binding in the promoter, as well as 3D chromatin clustering, is needed for genes to respond. BG-15a/n represent promising agents for treating patients with relapsed AR-driven mCRPC tumors.

Structural perspectives on the androgen receptor, the elusive shape-shifter

The androgen receptor (AR) is a type I nuclear receptor and master transcription factor responsible for development and maintenance of male secondary sex characteristics. Aberrant AR activity is associated with numerous diseases, including prostate cancer, androgen insensitivity syndrome, spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy, and androgenic alopecia. Recent studies have shown that AR adopts numerous conformations that can modulate its ability to bind and transcribe its target DNA substrates, a feature that can be hijacked in the context of cancer. Here, we summarize a series of structural observations describing how this elusive shape-shifter binds to multiple partners, including self-interactions, DNA, and steroid and non-steroidal ligands. We present evidence that AR's pervasive structural plasticity confers an ability to broadly bind and transcribe numerous ligands in the normal and disease state, and explain the structural basis for adaptive resistance mutations to antiandrogen treatment. These evolutionary features are integral to receptor function, and are commonly lost in androgen insensitivity syndrome, or reinforced in cancer.

MYO6 contributes to tumor progression and enzalutamide resistance in castration-resistant prostate cancer by activating the focal adhesion signaling pathway

BACKGROUND

Enzalutamide (Enz) resistance is a poor prognostic factor for patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), which often involves aberrant expression of the androgen receptor (AR). Myosin VI (MYO6), one member of the myosin family, plays an important role in regulating cell survival and is highly expressed in prostate cancer (PCa). However, whether MYO6 is involved in Enz resistance in CRPC and its mechanism remain unclear.

METHODS

Multiple open-access databases were utilized to examine the relationship between MYO6 expression and PCa progression, and to screen differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and potential signaling pathways associated with the MYO6-regulated Enz resistance. Both in vitro and in vivo tumorigenesis assays were employed to examine the impact of MYO6 on the growth and Enz resistance of PCa cells. Human PCa tissues and related clinical biochemical data were utilized to identify the role of MYO6 in promoting PCa progression and Enz resistance. The molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of gene expression, PCa progression, and Enz resistance in CRPC by MYO6 were investigated.

RESULTS

MYO6 expression increases in patients with PCa and is positively correlated with AR expression in PCa cell lines and tissues. Overexpression of AR increases MYO6 expression to promote PCa cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and to inhibit PCa cell apoptosis; whereas knockdown of MYO6 expression reverses these outcomes and enhances Enz function in suppressing the proliferation of the Enz- sensitive and resistant PCa cells both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, AR binds directly to the promoter region (residues - 503 to - 283 base pairs) of MYO6 gene and promotes its transcription. Furthermore, MYO6 activates focal adhesion kinase (FAK) phosphorylation at tyrosine-397 through integrin beta 8 (ITGB8) modulation to promote PCa progression and Enz resistance. Notably, inhibition of FAK activity by Y15, an inhibitor of FAK, can resensitize CRPC cells to Enz treatment in cell lines and mouse xenograft models.

CONCLUSIONS

MYO6 has pro-tumor and Enz-resistant effects in CRPC, suggesting that targeting MYO6 may be beneficial for ENZ-resistant CRPC therapy through the AR/MYO6/FAK signaling pathway.

Extra-nuclear and cytoplasmic steroid receptor signalling in hormone dependent cancers

Steroid hormone receptors are key mediators in the execution of hormone action through a combination of genomic and non-genomic action. Since their isolation and characterisation in the early 20th Century much of our understanding of the biological actions of steroid hormones are underpinned by their activated receptor activity. Over the past two decades there has been an acceleration of more omics-based research which has resulted in a major uptick in our comprehension of genomic steroid action. However, it is well understood that steroid hormones can induce very rapid signalling events in tandem with their genomic actions wherein they exert their influence through alterations in gene expression. Thus the totality of genomic and non-genomic steroid action occurs in a simultaneous and reciprocal manner and a greater appreciation of whole cell action is required to fully evaluate steroid hormone activity in vivo. In this mini-review we outline the most recent developments in non-genomic steroid action and cytoplasmic steroid hormone receptor biology in endocrine-related cancers with a focus on the 3-keto steroid receptors, in particular the androgen receptor.

Nuclear receptors: pathophysiological mechanisms and drug targets in liver disease

Nuclear receptors (NRs) are ligand-dependent transcription factors required for liver development and function. As a consequence, NRs have emerged as attractive drug targets in a wide range of liver diseases. However, liver dysfunction and failure are linked to loss of hepatocyte identity characterised by deficient NR expression and activities. This might at least partly explain why several pharmacological NR modulators have proven insufficiently efficient to improve liver functionality in advanced stages of diseases such as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). In this perspective, we review the most recent advances in the hepatic NR field and discuss the contribution of multiomic approaches to our understanding of their role in the molecular organisation of an intricated transcriptional regulatory network, as well as in liver intercellular dialogues and interorgan cross-talks. We discuss the potential benefit of novel therapeutic approaches simultaneously targeting multiple NRs, which would not only reactivate the hepatic NR network and restore hepatocyte identity but also impact intercellular and interorgan interplays whose importance to control liver functions is further defined. Finally, we highlight the need of considering individual parameters such as sex and disease stage in the development of NR-based clinical strategies.

Structural mechanism underlying variations in DNA binding by the androgen receptor

The androgen receptor (AR) is a steroid activated transcription factor which recognizes DNA motifs resembling inverted repeats of a conserved 5'-AGAACA-3'-like hexanucleotides separated by a three-nucleotide spacer from a similar, but less conserved hexanucleotide. Here, we report the structures of the human AR DNA binding domain (DBD) bound to two natural AREs (C3 and MTV) in head-to-head dimer conformations, diffracting at 2.05 Å and 2.25 Å, respectively. These structures help to explain the impact of androgen insensitivity mutations on the structure integrity, DNA binding and DBD dimerization. The binding affinity of the AR DBD to different DNA motifs were measured by the BioLayer Interferometry (BLI) and further validated by Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations. This shows that the high binding affinity of the first DBD to the upstream 5'-AGAACA-3' motif induces the cooperative binding of the second DBD to the second hexanucleotide. Our data indicate identical interaction of the DBDs to the upstream hexanucleotides, while forming an induced closer contact of the second DBD on the non-canonical hexanucleotides. The variation in binding between the DBD monomers are the result of differences in DNA occupancy, protein-protein interactions, DNA binding affinity, and DNA binding energy profiles. We propose this has functional consequences.

Androgen receptor and estrogen receptor variants in prostate and breast cancers

The androgen receptor (AR) and estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) are steroid receptor transcription factors with critical roles in the development and progression of prostate and breast cancers. Advances in the understanding of mechanisms underlying the ligand-dependent activation of these transcription factors have contributed to the development of small molecule inhibitors that block AR and ERα actions. These inhibitors include competitive antagonists and degraders that directly bind the ligand binding domains of these receptors, luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) analogs that suppress gonadal synthesis of testosterone or estrogen, and drugs that block specific enzymes required for biosynthesis of testosterone or estrogen. However, resistance to these therapies is frequent, and is often driven by selection for tumor cells with alterations in the AR or ESR1 genes and/or alternatively spliced AR or ESR1 mRNAs that encode variant forms AR or ERα. While most investigations involving AR have been within the context of prostate cancer, and the majority of investigations involving ERα have been within the context of breast cancer, important roles for AR have been elucidated in breast cancer, and important roles for ERα have been elucidated in prostate cancer. Here, we will discuss the roles of AR and ERα in breast and prostate cancers, outline the effects of gene- and mRNA-level alterations in AR and ESR1 on progression of these diseases, and identify strategies that are being developed to target these alterations therapeutically.

PROTACs targeting androgen receptor signaling: Potential therapeutic agents for castration-resistant prostate cancer

After the initial androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), part of the prostate cancer may continuously deteriorate into castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The majority of patients suffer from the localized illness at primary diagnosis that could rapidly assault other organs. This disease stage is referred as metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Surgery and radiation are still the treatment of CRPC, but have some adverse effects such as urinary symptoms and sexual dysfunction. Hormonal castration therapy interfering androgen receptor (AR) signaling pathway is indispensable for most advanced prostate cancer patients, and the first- and second-generation of novel AR inhibitors could effectively cure hormone sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC). However, the resistance to these chemical agents is inevitable, so many of patients may experience relapses. The resistance to AR inhibitor mainly involves AR mutation, splice variant formation and amplification, which indicates the important role in CRPC. Proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC), a potent technique to degrade targeted protein, has recently undergone extensive development as a biological tool and therapeutic drug. This technique has the potential to become the next generation of antitumor therapeutics as it could overcome the shortcomings of conventional small molecule inhibitors. In this review, we summarize the molecular mechanisms on PROTACs targeting AR signaling for CRPC, hoping to provide insights into drug development and clinical medication.

Testosterone Exacerbates the Formation of Liver Cancer Induced by Environmental N-Nitrosamines Exposure: Potential Mechanisms and Implications for Human Health

Background

Humans are frequently exposed to N-nitrosamines through various sources, including diet, cigarette smoking, contaminated water, the atmosphere, and endogenous nitrosation. Exposure to these carcinogens may also contribute to the gender-specific incidence of liver cancer, which is significantly higher in males than in females, possibly due to the influence of endogenous hormones such as testosterone. However, the effect of testosterone on N-nitrosamine-induced liver cancer and its underlying mechanism remains unclear.

Purpose

To investigate the effect of testosterone on the development of liver cancer induced by N-nitrosamines exposure.

Patients and Methods

Histopathological and immunohistochemical staining techniques were employed to analyze the expression levels and nuclear localizations of key signaling molecules, including androgen receptor (AR), β-catenin, and HMGB1, in both tumor and non-tumor regions of liver samples obtained from human patients and mice.

Results

The findings demonstrated a strong correlation between AR and β-catenin in the nuclear region of tumor areas. AR also showed a significant correlation with HMGB1 in the cytoplasmic region of non-tumor areas in both human and mice samples. The study further analyzed the expression levels and patterns of these three proteins during the progression of liver tumors.

Conclusion

This study confirms that AR has the ability to modulate the expression levels and patterns of β-catenin and HMGB1 in vivo, thereby exacerbating the progression of liver cancer induced by environmental N-nitrosamines exposure. Importantly, the effect of testosterone on the formation of liver cancer induced by environmental N-nitrosamine exposure intensifies this progression. These findings have important implications for drug safety in clinical practice and emphasize the significance of reducing N-nitrosamines exposure through conscious choices regarding diet and lifestyle to ensure environmental safety.

Blocking the dimerization of polyglutamine-expanded androgen receptor protects cells from DHT-induced toxicity by increasing AR turnover

Spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA) is a neuromuscular degenerative disease caused by a polyglutamine expansion in the androgen receptor (AR). This mutation causes AR to misfold and aggregate, contributing to toxicity in and degeneration of motor neurons and skeletal muscle. There is currently no effective treatment or cure for this disease. The role of an interdomain interaction between the amino- and carboxyl-termini of AR, termed the N/C interaction, has been previously identified as a component of androgen receptor-induced toxicity in cell and mouse models of SBMA. However, the mechanism by which this interaction contributes to disease pathology is unclear. This work seeks to investigate this mechanism by interrogating the role of AR homodimerization- a unique form of the N/C-interaction- in SBMA. We show that, although the AR N/C-interaction is reduced by polyglutamine-expansion, homodimers of 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT)-bound AR are increased. Additionally, blocking homodimerization results in decreased AR aggregation and toxicity in cell models. Blocking homodimerization results in the increased degradation of AR, which likely plays a role in the protective effects of this mutation. Overall, this work identifies a novel mechanism in SBMA pathology that may represent a novel target for the development of therapeutics for this disease.

Oligomerization mediated by the D2 domain of DTX3L is critical for DTX3L-PARP9 reading function of mono-ADP-ribosylated androgen receptor

Deltex proteins are a family of E3 ubiquitin ligases that encode C-terminal RING and DTC domains that mediate interactions with E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes and recognize ubiquitination substrates. DTX3L is unique among the Deltex proteins based on its N-terminal domain architecture. The N-terminal D1 and D2 domains of DTX3L mediate homo-oligomerization, and the D3 domain interacts with PARP9, a protein that contains tandem macrodomains with ADP-ribose reader function. While DTX3L and PARP9 are known to heterodimerize, and assemble into a high molecular weight oligomeric complex, the nature of the oligomeric structure, including whether this contributes to the ADP-ribose reader function is unknown. Here, we report a crystal structure of the DTX3L N-terminal D2 domain and show that it forms a tetramer with, conveniently, D2 symmetry. We identified two interfaces in the structure: a major, conserved interface with a surface of 973 Å2 and a smaller one of 415 Å2. Using native mass spectrometry, we observed molecular species that correspond to monomers, dimers and tetramers of the D2 domain. Reconstitution of DTX3L knockout cells with a D1-D2 deletion mutant showed the domain is dispensable for DTX3L-PARP9 heterodimer formation, but necessary to assemble an oligomeric complex with efficient reader function for ADP-ribosylated androgen receptor. Our results suggest that homo-oligomerization of DTX3L is important for the DTX3L-PARP9 complex to read mono-ADP-ribosylation on a ligand-regulated transcription factor.

A carboxy-terminal ubiquitylation site regulates androgen receptor activity

Degradation of unliganded androgen receptor (AR) in prostate cancer cells can be prevented by proteasome inhibition, but this is associated with only modest increases in polyubiquitylated AR. An inhibitor (VLX1570) of the deubiquitylases associated with the proteasome did not increase ubiquitylation of unliganded AR, indicating that AR is not targeted by these deubiquitylases. We then identified a series of AR ubiquitylation sites, including a not previously identified site at K911, as well as methylation sites and previously identified phosphorylation sites. Mutagenesis of K911 increases AR stability, chromatin binding, and transcriptional activity. We further found that K313, a previously reported ubiquitylation site, could also be methylated and acetylated. Mutagenesis of K313, in combination with K318, increases AR transcriptional activity, indicating that distinct posttranslational modifications at K313 differentially regulate AR activity. Together these studies expand the spectrum of AR posttranslational modifications, and indicate that the K911 site may regulate AR turnover on chromatin.

Hormone-induced enhancer assembly requires an optimal level of hormone receptor multivalent interactions

Transcription factors (TFs) activate enhancers to drive cell-specific gene programs in response to signals, but our understanding of enhancer assembly during signaling events is incomplete. Here, we show that androgen receptor (AR) forms condensates through multivalent interactions mediated by its N-terminal intrinsically disordered region (IDR) to orchestrate enhancer assembly in response to androgen signaling. AR IDR can be substituted by IDRs from selective proteins for AR condensation capacity and its function on enhancers. Expansion of the poly(Q) track within AR IDR results in a higher AR condensation propensity as measured by multiple methods, including live-cell single-molecule microscopy. Either weakening or strengthening AR condensation propensity impairs its heterotypic multivalent interactions with other enhancer components and diminishes its transcriptional activity. Our work reveals the requirement of an optimal level of AR condensation in mediating enhancer assembly and suggests that alteration of the fine-tuned multivalent IDR-IDR interactions might underlie AR-related human pathologies.

Targeting the Androgen Signaling Axis in Prostate Cancer

Activation of the androgen receptor (AR) and AR-driven transcriptional programs is central to the pathophysiology of prostate cancer. Despite successful translational efforts in targeting AR, therapeutic resistance often occurs as a result of molecular alterations in the androgen signaling axis. The efficacy of next-generation AR-directed therapies for castration-resistant prostate cancer has provided crucial clinical validation for the continued dependence on AR signaling and introduced a range of new treatment options for men with both castration-resistant and castration-sensitive disease. Despite this, however, metastatic prostate cancer largely remains an incurable disease, highlighting the need to better understand the diverse mechanisms by which tumors thwart AR-directed therapies, which may inform new therapeutic avenues. In this review, we revisit concepts in AR signaling and current understandings of AR signaling-dependent resistance mechanisms as well as the next frontier of AR targeting in prostate cancer.

The protein architecture and allosteric landscape of HNF4α

Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha (HNF4α) is a multi-faceted nuclear receptor responsible for governing the development and proper functioning of liver and pancreatic islet cells. Its transcriptional functions encompass the regulation of vital metabolic processes including cholesterol and fatty acid metabolism, and glucose sensing and control. Various genetic mutations and alterations in HNF4α are associated with diabetes, metabolic disorders, and cancers. From a structural perspective, HNF4α is one of the most comprehensively understood nuclear receptors due to its crystallographically observed architecture revealing interconnected DNA binding domains (DBDs) and ligand binding domains (LBDs). This review discusses key properties of HNF4α, including its mode of homodimerization, its binding to fatty acid ligands, the importance of post-translational modifications, and the mechanistic basis for allosteric functions. The surfaces linking HNF4α's DBDs and LBDs create a convergence zone that allows signals originating from any one domain to influence distant domains. The HNF4α-DNA complex serves as a prime illustration of how nuclear receptors utilize individual domains for specific functions, while also integrating these domains to create cohesive higher-order architectures that allow signal responsive functions.

The androgen receptor

The Androgen Receptor (AR) is a ligand (androgen) activated transcription factor and a member of the nuclear receptor (NR) superfamily. It is required for male sex hormone function. AR-FL (full-length) has the domain structure of NRs, an N-terminal domain (NTD) required for transactivation, a DNA-binding domain (DBD), a nuclear localization signal (NLS) and a ligand-binding domain (LBD). Paradoxes exist in that endogenous ligands testosterone (T) and 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) have differential effects on male sexual development while binding to the same receptor and transcriptional specificity is achieved even though the androgen response elements (AREs) are identical to those seen for the progesterone, glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptors. A high resolution 3-dimensional structure of AR-FL by either cryo-EM or X-ray crystallography has remained elusive largely due to the intrinsic disorder of the NTD. AR function is regulated by post-translational modification leading to a large number of proteoforms. The interaction of these proteoforms in multiprotein complexes with co-activators and co-repressors driven by interdomain coupling mediates the AR transcriptional output. The AR is a drug target for selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMS) that either have anabolic or androgenic effects. Protstate cancer is treated with androgen deprivation therapy or by the use of AR antagonists that bind to the LBD. Drug resistance occurs due to adaptive AR upregulation and the appearance of splice variants that lack the LBD and become constitutively active. Bipolar T treatment and NTD-antagonists could surmount these resistance mechanisms, respectively. These recent advances in AR signaling are described.

A partially open conformation of an androgen receptor ligand-binding domain with drug-resistance mutations

Mutations in the androgen receptor (AR) ligand-binding domain (LBD) can cause resistance to drugs used to treat prostate cancer. Commonly found mutations include L702H, W742C, H875Y, F877L and T878A, while the F877L mutation can convert second-generation antagonists such as enzalutamide and apalutamide into agonists. However, pruxelutamide, another second-generation AR antagonist, has no agonist activity with the F877L and F877L/T878A mutants and instead maintains its inhibitory activity against them. Here, it is shown that the quadruple mutation L702H/H875Y/F877L/T878A increases the soluble expression of AR LBD in complex with pruxelutamide in Escherichia coli. The crystal structure of the quadruple mutant in complex with the agonist dihydrotestosterone (DHT) reveals a partially open conformation of the AR LBD due to conformational changes in the loop connecting helices H11 and H12 (the H11-H12 loop) and Leu881. This partially open conformation creates a larger ligand-binding site for AR. Additional structural studies suggest that both the L702H and F877L mutations are important for conformational changes. This structural variability in the AR LBD could affect ligand binding as well as the resistance to antagonists.

Study of novel androgen receptor V770 variant in androgen insensitivity syndrome patients reveals the transitional state of the androgen receptor ligand binding domain homodimer

We report the discovery of the androgen receptor missense mutation V770D, that was found in two sisters suffering from complete androgen insensitivity. Experimental validation of AR V770 variants demonstrated that AR V770D was transcriptionally inactive due to the inability to dimerize and a reduced ligand binding affinity. The more conservative AR V770A variant showed a dimerization defect at low levels of DHT with a partial recovery of the transcriptional activity and of the receptor's ability to dimerize when increasing the DHT levels. With V770 located outside of the proposed LBD dimerization interface of the AR LBD homodimer crystal structure, the effects of the V770A mutation on AR dimerization were unexpected. We therefore explored whether the AR LBD dimerization interface would be better described by an alternative dimerization mode based on available human homodimeric LBD crystal structures of other nuclear receptors. Superposition of the monomeric AR LBD in the homodimeric crystal structures of GR, PR, ER, CAR, TRβ, and HNF-4α showed that the GR-like LBD dimer model was energetically the most stable. Moreover, V770 was a key energy residue in the GR-like LBD dimer while it was not involved in the stabilization of the AR LBD homodimer according to the crystal structure. Additionally, the observation that 4 AIS mutations impacted the stability of the AR LBD dimer while 16 mutations affected the GR-like LBD dimer, suggested that the AR LBD dimer crystal is a snapshot of a breathing AR LBD homodimer that can transition into the GR-like LBD dimer model.

A hotspot for posttranslational modifications on the androgen receptor dimer interface drives pathology and anti-androgen resistance

Mutations of the androgen receptor (AR) associated with prostate cancer and androgen insensitivity syndrome may profoundly influence its structure, protein interaction network, and binding to chromatin, resulting in altered transcription signatures and drug responses. Current structural information fails to explain the effect of pathological mutations on AR structure-function relationship. Here, we have thoroughly studied the effects of selected mutations that span the complete dimer interface of AR ligand-binding domain (AR-LBD) using x-ray crystallography in combination with in vitro, in silico, and cell-based assays. We show that these variants alter AR-dependent transcription and responses to anti-androgens by inducing a previously undescribed allosteric switch in the AR-LBD that increases exposure of a major methylation target, Arg⁷⁶¹. We also corroborate the relevance of residues Arg⁷⁶¹ and Tyr⁷⁶⁴ for AR dimerization and function. Together, our results reveal allosteric coupling of AR dimerization and posttranslational modifications as a disease mechanism with implications for precision medicine.

Quaternary glucocorticoid receptor structure highlights allosteric interdomain communication

The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor that binds DNA and assembles co-regulator complexes to regulate gene transcription. GR agonists are widely prescribed to people with inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Here we present high-resolution, multidomain structures of GR in complex with ligand, DNA and co-regulator peptide. The structures reveal how the receptor forms an asymmetric dimer on the DNA and provide a detailed view of the domain interactions within and across the two monomers. Hydrogen-deuterium exchange and DNA-binding experiments demonstrate that ligand-dependent structural changes are communicated across the different domains in the full-length receptor. This study demonstrates how GR forms a distinct architecture on DNA and how signal transmission can be modulated by the ligand pharmacophore, provides a platform to build a new level of understanding of how receptor modifications can drive disease progression and offers key insight for future drug design.

Exploring new frontiers in prostate cancer research: Report from the 2022 Coffey-Holden prostate cancer academy meeting

INTRODUCTION

The 2022 Coffey-Holden Prostate Cancer Academy (CHPCA) Meeting, "Exploring New Frontiers in Prostate Cancer Research," was held from June 23 to 26, 2022, at the University of California, Los Angeles, Luskin Conference Center, in Los Angeles, CA.

METHODS

The CHPCA Meeting is an annual discussion-oriented scientific conference organized by the Prostate Cancer Foundation, that focuses on emerging and next-step topics deemed critical for making the next major advances in prostate cancer research and clinical care. The 2022 CHPCA Meeting included 35 talks over 10 sessions and was attended by 73 academic investigators.

RESULTS

Major topic areas discussed at the meeting included: prostate cancer diversity and disparities, the impact of social determinants on research and patient outcomes, leveraging real-world and retrospective data, development of artificial intelligence biomarkers, androgen receptor (AR) signaling biology and new strategies for targeting AR, features of homologous recombination deficient prostate cancer, and future directions in immunotherapy and nuclear theranostics.

DISCUSSION

This article summarizes the scientific presentations from the 2022 CHPCA Meeting, with the goal that dissemination of this knowledge will contribute to furthering global prostate cancer research efforts.

Identification of an Evolutionarily Conserved Allosteric Network in Steroid Receptors

Allosteric pathways in proteins describe networks comprising amino acid residues which may facilitate the propagation of signals between distant sites. Through inter-residue interactions, dynamic and conformational changes can be transmitted from the site of perturbation to an allosteric site. While sophisticated computational methods have been developed to characterize such allosteric pathways linking specific sites on proteins, few attempts have been made to apply these approaches toward identifying new allosteric sites. Here, we use molecular dynamics simulations and suboptimal path analysis to discover new allosteric networks in steroid receptors with a focus on evolutionarily conserved pathways. Using modern receptors and a reconstructed ancestral receptor, we identify networks connecting several sites to the activation function surface 2 (AF-2), the site of coregulator recruitment. One of these networks is conserved across the entire family, connecting a predicted allosteric site located between helices 9 and 10 of the ligand-binding domain. We investigate the basis of this conserved network as well as the importance of this site, discovering that the site lies in a region of the ligand-binding domain characterized by conserved inter-residue contacts. This study suggests an evolutionarily importance of the helix 9-helix 10 site in steroid receptors and identifies an approach that may be applied to discover previously unknown allosteric sites in proteins.

Structure-function relationships of the aldosterone receptor

The cellular response to the adrenal steroid aldosterone is mediated by the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily of ligand-dependent transcription factors. The MR binds more than one physiological ligand with binding at the MR determined by pre-receptor metabolism of glucocorticoid ligands by 11β hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2. The MR has a wide tissue distribution with multiple roles beyond the classical role in electrolyte homeostasis including cardiovascular function, immune cell signaling, neuronal fate and adipocyte differentiation. The MR has three principal functional domains, an N-terminal ligand domain, a central DNA binding domain and a C-terminal, ligand binding domain, with structures having been determined for the latter two domains but not for the whole receptor. MR signal-transduction can be best viewed as a series of interactions which are determined by the conformation conferred on the receptor by ligand binding. This conformation then determines subsequent intra- and inter-molecular interactions. These interactions include chromatin, coregulators and other transcription factors, and additional less well characterized cytoplasmic non-genomic effects via crosstalk with other signaling pathways. This chapter will provide a review of MR structure and function, and an analysis of the critical interactions involved in MR-mediated signal transduction, which contribute to ligand- and tissue-specificity. Understanding the relevant mechanisms for selective MR signaling in terms of these interactions opens the possibility of novel therapeutic approaches for the treatment of MR-mediated diseases.

Dynamic phase separation of the androgen receptor and its coactivators key to regulate gene expression

Numerous cancers, including prostate cancer (PCa), are addicted to transcription programs driven by specific genomic regions known as super-enhancers (SEs). The robust transcription of genes at such SEs is enabled by the formation of phase-separated condensates by transcription factors and coactivators with intrinsically disordered regions. The androgen receptor (AR), the main oncogenic driver in PCa, contains large disordered regions and is co-recruited with the transcriptional coactivator mediator complex subunit 1 (MED1) to SEs in androgen-dependent PCa cells, thereby promoting oncogenic transcriptional programs. In this work, we reveal that full-length AR forms foci with liquid-like properties in different PCa models. We demonstrate that foci formation correlates with AR transcriptional activity, as this activity can be modulated by changing cellular foci content chemically or by silencing MED1. AR ability to phase separate was also validated in vitro by using recombinant full-length AR protein. We also demonstrate that AR antagonists, which suppress transcriptional activity by targeting key regions for homotypic or heterotypic interactions of this receptor, hinder foci formation in PCa cells and phase separation in vitro. Our results suggest that enhanced compartmentalization of AR and coactivators may play an important role in the activation of oncogenic transcription programs in androgen-dependent PCa.

Retinoic acid receptor structures: the journey from single domains to full-length complex

The retinoic acid receptors (RARα, β, and γ) are multi-domain polypeptides that heterodimerize with retinoid X receptors (RXRα, β, and γ) to form functional transcription factors. Understanding the three-dimensional molecular organization of these nuclear receptors (NRs) began with RAR and RXR DNA-binding domains (DBDs), and were followed with studies on isolated ligand-binding domains (LBDs). The more complete picture emerged in 2017 with the multi-domain crystal structure of RXRα-RARβ on its response element with retinoic acid molecules and coactivator segments on both proteins. The analysis of that structure and its complementary studies have clarified the direct communication pathways within RXR-RAR polypeptides, through which DNA binding, protein-ligand, and protein-protein interactions are integrated for overall functional responses. Understanding the molecular connections in the RXR-RAR complex has benefited from direct observations of the multi-domain structures of RXRα-PPARγ, RXRα-LXRβ, HNF-4α homodimer, and androgen receptor homodimer, each bound to its response element. These comprehensive NR structures show unique quaternary architectures, yet all have DBD-DBD, LBD-LBD, and DBD-LBD domain-domain contacts within them. These convergence zones allow signals from discrete domains of their polypeptides to be propagated and integrated across their entire complex, shaping their overall responses in an allosteric fashion.

A cryptic transactivation domain of EZH2 binds AR and AR's splice variant, promoting oncogene activation and tumorous transformation

Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 (EZH2) and androgen receptor (AR) are crucial chromatin/gene regulators involved in the development and/or progression of prostate cancer, including advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). To sustain prostate tumorigenicity, EZH2 establishes non-canonical biochemical interaction with AR for mediating oncogene activation, in addition to its canonical role as a transcriptional repressor and enzymatic subunit of Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2). However, the molecular basis underlying non-canonical activities of EZH2 in prostate cancer remains elusive, and a therapeutic strategy for targeting EZH2:AR-mediated oncogene activation is also lacking. Here, we report that a cryptic transactivation domain of EZH2 (EZH2TAD) binds both AR and AR spliced variant 7 (AR-V7), a constitutively active AR variant enriched in CRPC, mediating assembly and/or recruitment of transactivation-related machineries at genomic sites that lack PRC2 binding. Such non-canonical targets of EZH2:AR/AR-V7:(co-)activators are enriched for the clinically relevant oncogenes. We also show that EZH2TAD is required for the chromatin recruitment of EZH2 to oncogenes, for EZH2-mediated oncogene activation and for CRPC growth in vitro and in vivo. To completely block EZH2's multifaceted oncogenic activities in prostate cancer, we employed MS177, a recently developed proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC) of EZH2. Strikingly, MS177 achieved on-target depletion of both EZH2's canonical (EZH2:PRC2) and non-canonical (EZH2TAD:AR/AR-V7:co-activators) complexes in prostate cancer cells, eliciting far more potent antitumor effects than the catalytic inhibitors of EZH2. Overall, this study reports a previously unappreciated requirement for EZH2TAD for mediating EZH2's non-canonical (co-)activator recruitment and gene activation functions in prostate cancer and suggests EZH2-targeting PROTACs as a potentially attractive therapeutic for the treatment of aggressive prostate cancer that rely on the circuits wired by EZH2 and AR.

A Novel Mechanism of Coactivator Recruitment by the Nurr1 Nuclear Receptor

Nuclear receptors constitute one of the largest families of transcription factors that regulate genes in metazoans in response to small molecule ligands. Many receptors harbor two transactivation domains, one at each end of the protein sequence. Whereas the molecular mechanisms of transactivation mediated by the ligand-binding domain at the C-terminus of the protein are generally well established, the mechanism involving the N-terminal domain called activation function 1 (AF1) has remained elusive. Previous studies implicated the AF1 domain as a significant contributor towards the overall transcriptional activity of the NR4A family of nuclear receptors and suggested that the steroid receptor coactivators (SRCs) play an important role in this process. Here we show that a short segment within the AF1 domain of the NR4A receptor Nurr1 can directly engage with the SRC1 PAS-B domain. We also show that this segment forms a helix upon binding to a largely hydrophobic groove on PAS-B, overlapping with the surface engaged by the STAT6 transcription factor, suggesting that this mode of recruitment could be shared by diverse transcription factors including other nuclear receptors.

Vitamin D and Its Receptor from a Structural Perspective

The activities of 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, 1,25D₃, are mediated via its binding to the vitamin D receptor (VDR), a ligand-dependent transcription factor that belongs to the nuclear receptor superfamily. Numerous studies have demonstrated the important role of 1,25D₃ and VDR signaling in various biological processes and associated pathologies. A wealth of information about ligand recognition and mechanism of action by structural analysis of the VDR complexes is also available. The methods used in these structural studies were mainly X-ray crystallography complemented by NMR, cryo-electron microscopy and structural mass spectrometry. This review aims to provide an overview of the current knowledge of VDR structures and also to explore the recent progress in understanding the complex mechanism of action of 1,25D₃ from a structural perspective.

Identification of prognostic stemness biomarkers in colon adenocarcinoma drug resistance

BACKGROUND

Colon adenocarcinoma (COAD) is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are vital for COAD chemoresistance and recurrence, however little is known about stem cell-related biomarkers in drug resistance and COAD prognosis prediction.

METHODS

To uncover the roles of CSC in COAD tumorigenesis, chemoresistance, and prognosis, we retrieved COAD patients' RNAseq data from TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas). We further performed analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and mRNA expression-based stemness index (mRNAsi) to identify stemness-related COAD biomarkers. We then evaluated the roles of mRNAsi in tumorigenesis, clinical-stage, overall survival (OS), and chemoresistance. Afterward, we used identified prognostic stemness-related genes (PSRGs) to construct a prediction model. After constructing the prediction model, we used elastic Net regression and area under the curve (AUC) to explore the prediction value of PSRGs based on risk scores and the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve. To elucidate the underlying interconnected systems, we examined relationships between the levels of TFs, PSRGs, and 50 cancer hallmarks by a Pearson correlation analysis.

RESULTS

Twelve thousand one hundred eight DEGs were identified by comparing 456 primary COADs and 41 normal solid tissue samples. Furthermore, we identified 4351 clinical stage-related DEGs, 16,516 stemness-associated DEGs, and 54 chemoresistance-related DEGs from cancer stages: mRNAsi, and COAD chemoresistance. Compared to normal tissue samples, mRNAsi in COAD patients were marked on an elevation and involved in prognosis (p = 0.027), stemness-related DEGs based on chemoresistance (OR = 3.28, p ≤ 0.001) and AJCC clinical stage relating (OR = 4.02, p ≤ 0.001) to COAD patients. The prediction model of prognosis were constructed using the 6 PSRGs with high accuracy (AUC: 0.659). The model identified universal correlation between NRIP2 and FDFT1 (key PRSGs), and some cancer related transcription factors (TFs) and trademarks of cancer gene were in the regulatory network.

CONCLUSION

We found that mRNAsi is a reliable predictive biomarker of tumorigenesis and COAD prognosis. Our established prediction model of COAD chemoresistance, which includes the six PSRGs, is effective, as the model provides promising therapeutic targets in the COAD.