Epididymovasostomy as the first-line treatment of obstructive azoospermia in young couples with normal spermatogenesis

Outcomes of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy using intussusception technique: a systematic review and meta‑analysis

A systematic review and meta-analysis of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy (MVE) for treating epididymal obstructive azoospermia (EOA) with different intussusception techniques. We conducted a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, retained literature related to obstructive azoospermia or male infertility and vasoepididymostomy, proactively reviewed other relevant literature, supplemented valuable references, and excluded studies that did not use intussusception and where valuable statistical data were difficult to obtain. Event rate and risk ratio (RR) were estimated. Patency rates were investigated. The influence of motile sperms found in the epididymal fluid, anastomotic sides and sites on patency was evaluated. 273 articles were comprised in this analysis, and 25 observational studies were eventually included, with a total patient sample of 1400. The overall mean patency rate was 69.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 64.6-73.6%; I² = 63.735%). We conducted a meta-analysis of the factors affecting patency after microsurgical IVE, finding that the presence of motile sperms in epididymal fluid (RR = 1.52; 95% CI 1.18-1.97%; P = 0.001), anastomosing bilaterally (RR = 1.32; 95% CI 1.15-1.50%; P < 0.0001) and distally (RR = 1.42; 95% CI 1.09-1.85%; P = 0.009) lead to higher patency rates. IVE is an effective treatment for EOA. The presence of motile sperms found in the epididymal fluid, anastomosing bilaterally and distally are significantly correlated with higher patency rates.

Current progress on the curative effects of vasoepididymostomy for patients with obstructive azoospermia: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of human studies

BACKGROUND

Obstructive azoospermia (OA) is an important cause of male infertility, and epididymal OA (EOA) is a common disease. Microsurgical reconstruction is a common technique used in the treatment of EOA. In the present study, we analyzed the effectiveness of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy (MVE) at different levels and compared the differences among several MVE techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The included studies were published in English until May 14, 2021. The R 4.1.2 software was utilized to evaluate the event rate, risk ratio (RR), and 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 51 studies involving 2853 patients with OA were included in our meta-analysis. The overall mean patency rate of patients who underwent MVE was 67.20% (95% [CI]:63.30%-71.10%), and the overall mean natural pregnancy rate of their partners was 40.05% (95% [CI]: 35.30%-45.60%). The pooled results showed that the patency rate of bilateral MVE was higher than that of unilateral MVE (RR = 1.42; 95% [CI]:1.25-1.61; p < 0.00). A comparison of the anastomotic site of MVE showed that the caudal/corpus area was favorable for the patency rate (RR = 1.17; 95% [CI]:1.04 - 1.32; p < 0.00). The caudal area was also advantageous for the patency rate (RR = 1.20; 95% CI:1.03 - 1.41; p < 0.04). Compared with typical MVE (65.20%, 95% [CI]:61.40%-69.10%), deferential vessel-sparing MVE with a higher overall mean patency rate (83.60%, 95% [CI]:75.40%-91.70%).

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analyses indicated that MVE is a high- and cost-effective therapeutic method for patients with EOA, and deferential vessel-sparing MVE could be mainstream in the near future.

The role of vasoepididymostomy for treatment of obstructive azoospermia in the era of in vitro fertilization : a systematic review and meta-analysis

This study comprises a systematic review and meta.analysis of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy outcomes in epididymal obstructive azoospermia. A comprehensive literature search was performed using Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane library that included all studies related to microsurgical vasoepididymostomy. Keywords included "vasoepididymostomy" "epididymovasostomy" "epididymal obstruction" and "epididymis obstruction" Event rate and risk ratio (RR) were estimated. Patency rate and pregnancy rate were investigated. The analysis comprised 1422 articles, including 42 observational studies with 2298 enrolled patients performed from November 1978 to January 2017. The overall mean patency rate was 64.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 58.5%.69.3%; I2 =83.0%), and the overall mean pregnancy rate was 31.1% (95% CI: 26.9%.35.7%; I2 =73.0%). We performed a meta-analysis comparing the patency rate of bilateral microsurgical vasoepididymostomy and unilateral microsurgical vasoepididymostomy and found an RR of 1.38% (95% CI: 1.21%-1.57%; P < 0.00001). A comparison of the site of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy showed that caudal or corpus area was favorable for patency rate (RR = 1.17%; 95% CI: 1.01%-1.35%; P = 0.04). Patients with motile sperm in epididymal fluid exhibited an RR of 1.53% (95% CI: 1.11%-2.13%; P = 0.01) with respect to patency rate. Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy is an effective treatment for epididymal obstructive azoospermia that can improve male fertility. We find that performing microsurgical vasoepididymostomy bilaterally, anastomosing a larger caudal area, and containing motile sperm in epididymis fluid can potentially achieve a superior patency rate.

The evolution and refinement of vasoepididymostomy techniques

Obstructive azoospermia secondary to epididymal obstruction can be corrected by microsurgical reconstruction with vasoepididymostomy (VE). Although alternative management such as epididymal or testicular sperm aspiration in conjunction with intracytoplasmic sperm injection is feasible, various studies have established the superior cost-effectiveness of VE as a treatment of choice. Microsurgical VE is considered one of the most technically challenging microsurgeries. Its success rate is highly dependent on the skills and experience of the surgeons. Various techniques have been described in the literature for VE. We have pioneered a technique known as longitudinal intussusception VE (LIVE) in which the epididymal tubule is opened longitudinally to obtain a larger opening to allow its tubular content to pass through the anastomosis. Our preliminary data demonstrated a patency rate of over 90%. This technique has been widely referenced in the recent literature including robotic-assisted microsurgery. The history of the development of different VE approaches, the preoperative evaluation along with the techniques of various VE will be described in this article.