[Malignant tumors of the ampulla of Vater. Results of radical excision. A study of 39 cases]

[Survival, mortality and quality of life after pylorus-preserving or classical Whipple operation. A systematic review with meta-analysis]

BACKGROUND

Two surgical procedures are mainly performed for the treatment of pancreatic head cancer and periampullary carcinoma: the classical Whipple operation and the pylorus-preserving Whipple operation.

METHODS

This manuscript represents an extension of a systematic review and meta-analysis previously published in the Annals of Surgery. A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library (central) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. A meta-analysis based on a random-effects model was performed for the hazard ratios (HR) of survival and the odds ratios (OR) of postoperative mortality. The results of the different studies on quality of life (QoL) could not be summarized quantitatively in a meta-analysis and were therefore summarized qualitatively. Subgroup analyses were performed by study type, RCTs, prospective cohort studies (PSs), retrospective cohort studies (RSs), study quality and tumor localization (pancreatic head cancer versus periampullary carcinoma).

RESULTS

The systematic literature search retrieved 4,503 studies of which 4,460 did not fulfill the inclusion criteria. The remaining 43 studies (6 RCTs, 12 PSs and 25 RSs) representing 3,893 patients were finally included in the review. There was neither a significant survival difference for patients with pancreatic head cancer in the pooled estimate of the RCTs (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.53-1.22; p=0.16) nor in the pooled estimate of the PSs (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.7-1.0; p=0.95) or the RSs (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.7-1.01; p=0.21). Survival of patients with periampullary carcinoma was not significantly different in the RCTs (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.49-2.13; p=0.3), the PSs (HR 1.26; 95% CI 0.46-3.42; p=0.65) or the RSs (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.6-1.24; p=0.33). Postoperative mortality was not significantly different after both types of operations (RCTs: HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.17-1.4; p=0.18; PSs: HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.34-1.18; p=0.15; RSs: HR 0.7; 95% CI 0.37-1.31; p=0.27). QoL was reported as either the same in both groups or in favor of the pylorus-preserving Whipple operation.

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality, survival and QoL were not significantly different between the classical Whipple and the pylorus-preserving Whipple operations. Given the poor quality of the underlying trials a pragmatic RCT is recommended to prove the findings of this systematic review.

Usefulness of follow-up after pancreatoduodenectomy for carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater

BACKGROUND

The prognosis for carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater (CAV) is better than for pancreatic cancer. The 5-year survival median rate after resection of CAV is 45%, but late recurrences remain possible. Several survival factors have been identified (lymph nodes, perineural invasion), but few data are available on the type of recurrences, their impact and their management.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 41 patients treated by pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for CAV from 1980 to 2003 were studied retrospectively. Patient selection, long-term survival recurrence rate and recurrence treatment were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate proportional hazards analysis were conducted on this series.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 48 months. Five-year survival was 62.8%. Eleven patients had recurrences (6-67 months). Recurrence was associated with time to all-causes death (hazard ratio [HR] 4.3, p=0.003). Factors predictive of recurrence were perineural invasion (HR 5.3, p=0.02), lymph node invasion (HR 5.3, p=0.02) and differentiation (HR 0.2, p=0.05). Three patients underwent surgical R0 treatment of their recurrences. Two who presented with solitary liver metastasis are alive and disease-free.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence represents a serious threat in the prognosis of CAV after surgery. Some of these recurrences, in particular liver metastases, are accessible for a curative treatment. This finding supports the usefulness of a close and long-term follow-up after surgery to improve survival of patients with CAV, especially in the group of patients with a good prognosis.