How reliable is modern breast imaging in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions in the symptomatic population?

Peritumoural Strain Elastography of Newly Diagnosed Breast Tumours: Does Maximum Peritumoural Halo Depth Correlate with Tumour Differentiation and Grade?

To evaluate the diagnostic utility of the maximum ultrasound strain elastography (SE) halo depth in newly diagnosed and histologically confirmed breast lesions, a retrospective study approval was granted by the local Ethical Review Board. Overall, the maximum strain elastography peritumoural halos (SEPHmax)-the maximum distance between the SE stiffening area and the B-mode lesion size-in 428 cases with newly diagnosed breast lesions were retrospectively analysed alongside patient age, affected quadrant, tumour echogenicity, size, acoustic shadowing, and vascularity. Statistical analysis included an ordinary one-way ANOVA to compare the SEPHmax between BI-RADS 2, 3, and 5 groups and between tumour grades 1, 2, and 3. A binary regression analysis was used to determine the correlation between tumour malignancy and the above-mentioned demographic and imaging factors. SEPHmax was significantly higher in BI-RADS 5 tumours (5.5 ± 3.9 mm) compared to BI-RADS 3 (0.9 ± 1.7 mm, p < 0.0001) and 2 (0.6 ± 1.4 mm, p < 0.0001). The receiver operating characteristic area under the curve was 0.933 for the detection of BI-RADS 5 lesions. Furthermore, tumour grades 2 (5.6 ± 3.6 mm, p = 0.001) and 3 (6.8 ± 4.2 mm, p < 0.0001) exhibited significantly higher SEPHmax than grade 1 tumours (4.0 ± 3.9 mm). Similarly, St. Gallen Ki67-stratified low-risk (p = 0.005) and intermediate-risk (p = 0.013) tumours showed smaller SEPHmax than high-risk tumours. Multivariate analysis revealed a significant correlation between malignant differentiation and SEPHmax (standardized regression coefficient 3.17 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.42-3.92], p < 0.0001), low tumour echogenicity (1.68 [95% CI 0.41-3.00], p = 0.03), and higher patient age (0.89 [95% CI 0.52-1.26], p < 0.0001). High SEPHmax is a strong predictor for tumour malignancy and a higher tumour grade and can be used to improve tumour characterisation before histopathological evaluation. It may also enable radiologists to identify lesions warranting observation rather than immediate biopsy.

Clinically guided core biopsy and cutaneous punch biopsy in the evaluation of breast lesions: a necessary test or an obsolete skill?

OBJECTIVE

The vast majority of breast cancers are diagnosed via image-guided procedures yet despite significant advances, imaging does not identify all breast malignancies. Clinically suspicious breast lesions with normal breast imaging remain a cause for concern. The aim of this study is to determine the diagnostic value of clinical core and cutaneous punch biopsies in the diagnosis of breast malignancy in clinically suspicious lesions with normal breast imaging.

METHODS

All patients with suspicious clinical breast findings and normal imaging who underwent a clinical core and/or cutaneous punch biopsy from 2012 to 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients with subsequent breast malignant diagnosis were analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 283 biopsies (166 clinical core, 117 cutaneous punch) performed over the 7-year period were included in the analysis. A total of 263/283 (93%) yielded a benign outcome. A total of 2/283 (0.7%) yielded B3 lesions (probably benign). These lesions were benign on final surgical excision. A total of 18/283 (6.3%) yielded a malignant histopathology. Sixteen out of 18 were cutaneous punch biopsies, and 2/18 were clinical core biopsies. A total of 14/18 patients presented with nipple changes, while 4/18 had a palpable area of concern. Histopathological analysis demonstrated Paget's disease of the nipple in 8/18, invasive carcinoma in 9/18 out of which two represented a recurrence of breast malignancy. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma was diagnosed in 1/18.

CONCLUSION

Clinical core and cutaneous punch biopsies remain a valuable tool in the diagnosis of breast cancer particularly in the management of clinically suspicious radiographically occult malignancies.

The Effect of Targeted Ultrasound as Primary Imaging Modality on Quality of Life in Women with Focal Breast Complaints: A Comparative Cohort Study

Background: The high diagnostic performance of modern breast ultrasound (US) opens the possibility to shift toward targeted US as initial imaging test in women with breast complaints. This comparative cohort study investigates the effects of starting with US followed by digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), as practiced in the breast ultrasound study (BUST), on women's health-related quality of life (QoL). Methods: Fifty BUST participants and 50 "controls" who underwent DBT and US in regular order filled out the EQ-5D-3L three times during their visit: BUST participants before US (T1), after US (T2), and after DBT (T3) and non-BUST participants before DBT (T1), after DBT (T2), and after US (T3). Changes in QoL from baseline to T2 and T3 were assessed using generalized least squares, also taking into account the effects of biopsy, age, and complaint type. Results: Participants' mean age was 50.6 years (BUST: SD = 12.1, controls: SD = 11.5). At T2 the overall QoL was higher [t(102.9) = 2.4, p = 0.017] and anxiety levels were lower [t(98.7) = -2.4, p = 0.020] in BUST participants compared with controls. However, from T2 to T3 these effects equalize, resulting in similar performances in QoL and anxiety at T3, respectively [t(97.6) = -2.3, p = 0.023] and [t(97.2) = 3.1, p = 0.002]. Compared with BUST participants, controls show a clear decrease in pain after US [t(106.5) = -2.8, p = 0.006]. Women undergoing biopsy had lower QoL [t(167.1) = -2.4, p = 0.017] and pain [t(154.1) = -2.1, p = 0.038], and more anxiety [t(187.4) = 4.3, p = 0.000]. Conclusions: The results suggest that changing the radiological order by starting with US has a short-term positive effect on overall QoL, anxiety, and DBT pain experience in symptomatic women. Owing to its negative impact, biopsies should be performed cautiously. In conclusion, the moment of reassurance for women advances by reversing the radiological order according to the BUST, showing the high importance of human interaction in diagnostic care in addition to the clinical performance of imaging modalities.

Correlation of Mammography, Ultrasound and Sonoelastographic Findings With Histopathological Diagnosis in Breast Lesions

Introduction Breast masses range from inflammatory and benign to malignant lesions, varying in different age groups and clinical presentations. Breast imaging techniques leading to prompt and specific diagnosis have been a lifesaver for millions around the globe saving them undue mental stress in inflammatory lesions and preventing early death in case of neoplasms. Here, we compare mammography, ultrasonography (US) and ultrasound elastography in the screening and diagnosis of breast lesions and the usefulness of strain ratio as a non-invasive tool in diagnosing breast malignancies. Aims and objectives Determining the characteristics of breast lesions on imaging by mammogram, ultrasonography, elastography, calculating strain ratio and correlating them with histopathology. To further estimate the advantages and limitations of one modality over the other in the evaluation of breast lesions. Methods The study was done over a duration of 18 months from November 2019 to June 2021 at JSS Medical College and Hospital, Mysuru. In this prospective study, 73 female patients with palpable breast lesions were evaluated using mammography, US and sonoelastography and were co-related with histopathological findings.  Results This study has proved that the use of ultrasound elastography has higher sensitivity (91.67% with strain ratio kept at 3) in detecting malignant lesions when compared with x-ray mammography and ultrasonography having a sensitivity of 87.88% and 90.91%, respectively. Our study confirmed that there is a correlation between strain ratio and histopathological findings and that the strain ratio has high sensitivity in diagnosing and differentiating malignant breast lesions. Conclusions Mammography, US and sonoelastography when combined together are helpful in characterization and management of breast lesions. This helps to avoid unnecessary invasive interventions. The specificity of the study in detecting malignant lesions was comparable with that of histopathological analysis.

US-Elastography for Breast Lesion Characterization: Prospective Comparison of US BIRADS, Strain Elastography and Shear wave Elastography

PURPOSE

 To evaluate the diagnostic performance of strain elastography (SE) and 2 D shear wave elastography (SWE) and SE/SWE combination in comparison with conventional multiparametric ultrasound (US) with respect to improving BI-RADS classification results and differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions using a qualitative and quantitative assessment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 In this prospective study, 130 histologically proven breast masses were evaluated with baseline US, color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS), SE and SWE (Toshiba Aplio 500 with a 7-15 MHz wide-band linear transducer). Each lesion was classified according to the BIRADS lexicon by evaluating the size, the B-mode and color Doppler features, the SE qualitative (point color scale) and SE semi-quantitative (strain ratio) methods, and quantitative SWE. Histological results were compared with BIRADS, strain ratio (SR) and shear wave elastography (SWE) all performed by one investigator blinded to the clinical examination and mammographic results at the time of the US examination. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the diagnostic performance of B-mode US, SE, SWE, and their combination.

RESULTS

 Histological examination revealed 47 benign and 83 malignant breast lesions. The accuracy of SR was statistically significantly higher than SWE (sensitivity, specificity and AUC were 89.2 %, 76.6 % and 0.83 for SR and 72.3 %, 66.0 % and 0.69 for SWE, respectively, p = 0.003) but not higher than B-mode US (B-mode US sensitivity, specificity and AUC were 85.5 %, 78.8 %, 0.821, respectively, p = 1.000).

CONCLUSION

 Our experience suggests that conventional US in combination with both SE and SWE is a valid tool that can be useful in the clinical setting, can improve BIRADS category assessment and may help in the differentiation of benign from malignant breast lesions, with SE having higher accuracy than SWE.

The value of mammography in women with focal breast complaints in addition to initial targeted ultrasound

PURPOSE

To determine the added value of mammography in women with focal breast complaints and the utility of initial targeted ultrasound in this setting.

METHODS

Women with symptomatic breast disease who were evaluated by breast imaging (mammography/digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasound) between January 2016 and December 2016 in the Radboud University Medical Centre were included. We retrospectively collected the following data: date of birth, indication of imaging, visibility on mammography/ultrasound, whether biopsy was taken, additional findings, BI-RADS-classification, pathology and follow-up results.

RESULTS

A total of 494 women were included (mean age 46.5, range 30 to 93). In 49 women (9.9%), symptomatic breast cancer was diagnosed, all visible during targeted ultrasound. The negative predictive value of targeted ultrasound was very high (99.8%). Additional findings on mammography were significantly more often malignant when the symptomatic lesion was also malignant (3.8% vs 70%, P < 0.05). In only one patient with symptoms caused by a benign finding, an incidental malignancy was detected on mammography outside the area of complaint (detection rate 2.2/1000 examinations).

CONCLUSIONS

The contribution of mammography for cancer detection in women with focal breast complaints is very low when targeted ultrasound is performed. Additional findings are most common in patients with symptomatic breast cancer. Our results suggest that initial targeted ultrasound is a more appropriate initial tool for the evaluation of focal breast complaints. Mammography could be performed on indication only.

The role of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with palpable breast abnormalities and negative mammographic and sonographic findings

OBJECTIVE OR PURPOSE OF STUDY

The objective of this retrospective study was to determine the frequency of positive findings on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with palpable breast abnormalities in the setting of negative mammographic and sonographic evaluations.

MATERIALS, METHODS, AND PROCEDURES

Consecutive patients undergoing breast MRI for palpable abnormalities from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2015 were identified for this retrospective study. Those with preceding imaging (mammograms or ultrasounds) demonstrating positive findings related to the palpable abnormalities were excluded. The location and the duration of the symptoms, the type and the location of the abnormal MRI findings, and their relationships to the symptoms were recorded. Clinical and imaging follow-up as well as the type and the resultant biopsies were recorded. Patients with less than two years of imaging or clinical follow-up were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

22 004 women presented with palpable abnormalities at one breast imaging center between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2015. Nine thousand and three hundred and thirty-four patients had negative or benign findings on mammography, ultrasound, or mammography plus ultrasound. Thirty-one patients underwent MRI with the complaint of palpable abnormalities despite negative or benign mammographic and/or sonographic findings. Their age range was between 32 and 74 years, and their mean age was 49 years. Of those who had MRI, twenty-one patients had negative MRI findings. Six patients had negative concordant results for the palpable abnormalities and benign incidental findings. Three patients had benign concordant results for the palpable abnormalities, and one patient had incidental atypia. Twenty-eight patients had negative MRI results in the area of the palpable abnormality, and none of these patients underwent biopsy. Of the 31 cases, four patients (13%) underwent additional examinations (three second-look ultrasounds and one bone scan) after MRI. Five patients (16%) underwent MRI-guided biopsies, two patients (6%) underwent ultrasound-guided biopsies, and one patient (3%) had an excision. All biopsies showed benign results. The Gail risk score was calculated for 22 of them and the mean 5-year risk was 1.64 and the mean lifetime risk was 12.51.

CONCLUSION

Breast MRI to evaluate palpable abnormalities after negative mammography and ultrasound results in a low yield for malignancy. The majority of patients (67.7%) had negative MRI examinations, and there were no malignancies detected. Our findings lead us to believe that there are no data to encourage the use of MRI in patients with palpable abnormalities and negative mammographic and/or ultrasound studies.

The Right Direction Needed to Develop White-Box Deep Learning in Radiology, Pathology, and Ophthalmology: A Short Review

The popularity of deep learning (DL) in the machine learning community has been dramatically increasing since 2012. The theoretical foundations of DL are well-rooted in the classical neural network (NN). Rule extraction is not a new concept, but was originally devised for a shallow NN. For about the past 30 years, extensive efforts have been made by many researchers to resolve the "black box" problem of trained shallow NNs using rule extraction technology. A rule extraction technology that is well-balanced between accuracy and interpretability has recently been proposed for shallow NNs as a promising means to address this black box problem. Recently, we have been confronting a "new black box" problem caused by highly complex deep NNs (DNNs) generated by DL. In this paper, we first review four rule extraction approaches to resolve the black box problem of DNNs trained by DL in computer vision. Next, we discuss the fundamental limitations and criticisms of current DL approaches in radiology, pathology, and ophthalmology from the black box point of view. We also review the conversion methods from DNNs to decision trees and point out their limitations. Furthermore, we describe a transparent approach for resolving the black box problem of DNNs trained by a deep belief network. Finally, we provide a brief description to realize the transparency of DNNs generated by a convolutional NN and discuss a practical way to realize the transparency of DL in radiology, pathology, and ophthalmology.

Attributes, Performance, and Gaps in Current & Emerging Breast Cancer Screening Technologies

Background:

Early detection of breast cancer, combined with effective treatment, can reduce mortality. Millions of women are diagnosed with breast cancer and many die every year globally. Numerous early detection screening tests have been employed. A wide range of current breast cancer screening methods are reviewed based on a series of searchers focused on clinical testing and performance. </P><P> Discussion: The key factors evaluated centre around the trade-offs between accuracy (sensitivity and specificity), operator dependence of results, invasiveness, comfort, time required, and cost. All of these factors affect the quality of the screen, access/eligibility, and/or compliance to screening programs by eligible women. This survey article provides an overview of the working principles, benefits, limitations, performance, and cost of current breast cancer detection techniques. It is based on an extensive literature review focusing on published works reporting the main performance, cost, and comfort/compliance metrics considered.

Conclusion:

Due to limitations and drawbacks of existing breast cancer screening methods there is a need for better screening methods. Emerging, non-invasive methods offer promise to mitigate the issues particularly around comfort/pain and radiation dose, which would improve compliance and enable all ages to be screened regularly. However, these methods must still undergo significant validation testing to prove they can provide realistic screening alternatives to the current accepted standards.

Value of Ultrasound in the Detection of Benign and Malignant Breast Diseases: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study

Objectives

We sought to determine the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for benign and malignant breast lesions.

Methods

This retrospective study was performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in 203 patients with complete medical records who visited Mehr Medical Imaging Center for breast ultrasound between March 2014 and February 2016. The collected data comprised of demographic characteristics, ultrasound results (consisting of the anatomic area of the lesion, the involved side, and the ultrasound characteristics of the lesion), mammogram results, and pathology reports (if surgery or biopsy was performed).

Results

For the diagnosis of malignant and benign lesions, ultrasound had a sensitivity of 93.9% and specificity of 86.5%; its positive and negative predictive values were 86.9% and 93.8%, respectively. Lesion type was significantly associated with a family history of breast cancer and fertility status (p < 0.005), but there was no significant association between the involved side and tumor type (p > 0.050).

Conclusions

Mammography is the best technique for screening and identifying patients with non-mass-like breast lesions and microcalcifications. Considering the false positive and false-negative results, ultrasound is not a perfect screening modality. Future studies are recommended to study the value of ultrasound in the detection of high-risk breast cancer patients.

Problem-Solving MR Imaging for Equivocal Imaging Findings and Indeterminate Clinical Symptoms of the Breast

Breast MR imaging is commonly used for high-risk screening and for assessing the extent of disease in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer, but its utility for assessing suspicious symptoms and equivocal imaging findings is less widely accepted. The authors review current literature and guidelines regarding the use of breast MR imaging for these indications. Overall, problem-solving breast MR imaging is best reserved for pathologic nipple discharge and sonographically occult architectural distortion with limited biopsy options. Further study is necessary to define the role of problem-solving MR imaging for calcifications, mammographic asymmetries, and surgical scarring.

Thyroid nodules coexisting with either cystic or solid breast nodules: a new clue for this association between nodules coming from ultrasonography

Background

Thyroid and breast nodules (BNs) are common, their prevalence varying based mainly on the population (including age, residence in area of different iodine availability) studied and methods used. The coincidence of thyroid and breast diseases remains controversial and the majority of the studies evaluate the association between breast cancer and thyroid disorders. Here we describe our experience of such association in a non-oncological series.

Methods

Between the years 2000 and 2005, 3,372 patients from outpatient clinics were referred for thyroid ultrasonography (US) at our University Hospital; concurrent breast US in the 1,896 women revealed the presence of BNs in 127. The 127 women were divided into two groups, based on the cystic or solid nature of the BN(s).

Results

In 84/127 (66.1%) the single or multiple BN was/were cystic (group 1), while in the remaining 43 (33.9%) the single or multiple BN was/were solid [group 2; 19/43 had one thyroid nodule (TN) and the remaining 24/43 had ≥2 TNs]. When BN were cystic the coexisting TN(s) was/were more likely to be concordant in localization (i.e., right/right or left/left localization) whereas, when the BN were solid, the coexisting thyroid nodule/nodules was/were more likely to be discordant. In women with cystic BNs (CBNs), TNs were more frequently multiple (64% of cases), whereas in cases with solid BNs (SBNs), the frequency of single and multiple TNs was approximately the same. In patients with TNs/CBNs, TNs tend to be subcentimetric and localized in the inferior pole of either thyroid lobe. In patients with TNs/SBNs, TNs tend to be larger and localized in the middle of either thyroid lobe.

Conclusions

In women with BNs associated with TNs, there are interesting differences concerning TNs when patients are stratified based on the cystic or solid nature of the BN.

Impact of the Addition of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) to Standard 2D Digital Screening Mammography on the Rates of Patient Recall, Cancer Detection, and Recommendations for Short-term Follow-up

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The addition of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) to digital screening mammography (DM) has been shown to decrease recall rates and improve cancer detection rates, but there is a lack of data regarding the impact of DBT on rates of short-term follow-up. We assessed possible changes in performance measures with the introduction of DBT at our facility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In our observational study, databases were used to compare rates of recall, short-term follow-up, biopsy, and cancer detection between women undergoing DM without (n = 10,477) and women undergoing DM with (n = 2304) the addition of DBT. Regression analysis was performed to determine associations with patient age, breast density, and availability of comparison examinations.

RESULTS

The addition of DBT resulted in significantly lower recall rates (16%-14%, P = .017), higher rates of biopsy (12.7%-19.1%, P < .01), and increased detection of ductal carcinoma in situ, with a difference of 2.3 cases per 1000 screens (P = .044). A 33% increase in cancer detection rates was observed with DBT, which did not reach statistical significance. Short-term follow-up of probably benign findings was 80% higher in the DBT group (odds ratio = 1.80, 95% confidence interval = 1.38-2.36, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, we are the first to study the impact of DBT on rates of short-term follow-up, and observed an 80% increase over the DM group. Further research is needed to determine the malignancy rate of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 lesions detected with DBT, and establish appropriate follow-up to maximize cancer detection while minimizing expense and patient anxiety.

Experimental mammary carcinogenesis - Rat models

Mammary cancer is one of the most common cancers, victimizing more than half a million of women worldwide every year. Despite all the studies in this field, the current therapeutic approaches are not effective and have several devastating effects for patients. In this way, the need to better understand the mammary cancer biopathology and find effective therapies led to the development of several rodent models over years. With this review, the authors intended to provide the readers with an overview of the rat models used to study mammary carcinogenesis, with a special emphasis on chemically-induced models.

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the most common malignant disease diagnosed in women worldwide. Screening with mammography has the ability to detect breast cancer at an early stage. The diagnostic accuracy of mammography screening largely depends on the radiographic density of the imaged breasts. In radiographically dense breasts, non-calcified breast cancers are more likely to be missed than in fatty breasts. As a consequence, some cancers are not detected by mammography screening. Supporters of adjunct ultrasonography to the screening regimen for breast cancer argue that it might be a safe and inexpensive approach to reduce the false negative rates of the screening process. Critics, however, are concerned that performing supplemental ultrasonography on women at average risk will also increase the rate of false positive findings and can lead to unnecessary biopsies and treatments.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the comparative effectiveness and safety of mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening for women at average risk of breast cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group's Specialised Register, MEDLINE (via OvidSP) and EMBASE up until February 2012.To detect ongoing or unpublished studies, we searched the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), ClinicalTrials.gov and the National Cancer Institute's clinical trial database until June 2012. In addition, we conducted grey literature searches using the following sources: OpenGrey; National Institute of Health RePORTER; Health Services Research Projects in Progress (HSRPROJ); Hayes, Inc. Health Technology Assessment; The New York Academy of Medicine's Grey Literature Index and Conference Papers Index.

SELECTION CRITERIA

For efficacy, we considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs), with either individual or cluster randomisation, and prospective, controlled non-randomised studies with a low risk of bias and a sample size of at least 500 participants.In addition to studies eligible for efficacy, we considered any controlled, non-randomised study with a low risk of bias and a study size of at least 500 participants for the assessment of harms.Our population of interest were women between the ages of 40 and 75 years who were at average risk for breast cancer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors screened abstracts and full-text publications against the inclusion criteria. None of the studies met our inclusion criteria.

MAIN RESULTS

Our review did not detect any controlled studies on the use of adjunct ultrasonography for screening in women at average risk for breast cancer. One ongoing randomised controlled trial was identified (J-START, Japan).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Presently, there is no methodologically sound evidence available justifying the routine use of ultrasonography as an adjunct screening tool in women at average risk for breast cancer.

Value of one-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in diagnostic workup of women with clinical signs and symptoms and in women recalled from screening

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic value of one-view digital breast tomosynthesis versus two-view full-field digital mammography (FFDM) alone, and versus a combined reading of both modalities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The datasets of one-view digital breast tomosynthesis and two-view FFDM of abnormal mammograms in 144 consecutive women admitted for diagnostic workup with clinical signs and symptoms (n = 78) or recalled from screening (n = 66) were read alone and in a combined setting. The malignant or benign nature of the lesions was established by histologic analysis of biopsied lesions or by 12-16-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Eighty-six of the 144 patients were found to have breast cancer. The BI-RADS categories for one-view digital breast tomosynthesis were significantly better than those for two-view FFDM (p < 0.001) and were equal to those of the combined reading in both women admitted for diagnostic workup and women recalled from screening. The sensitivity and negative predictive values of digital breast tomosynthesis were superior to those of FFDM in fatty and dense breasts overall and in women admitted for diagnostic workup and in women recalled from screening. Only 11% of digital breast tomosynthesis examinations required additional imaging, compared with 23% of FFDMs.

CONCLUSION

In patients with abnormal mammograms, one-view digital breast tomosynthesis had better sensitivity and negative predictive value than did FFDM in patients with fatty and dense breasts. They also suggest that digital breast tomosynthesis would likely increase the predictive values if incorporated in routine screening.

[Diagnostic imaging in oncology--evidence reviews for evidence based guidelines by the Agency of Quality for Medicine (ÄZQ)]

Within the context of the development of evidence-based oncology guidelines, the Agency for Quality in Medicine undertook evidence reviews for diagnostic imaging procedures. Systematic searches retrieved no randomised controlled trials, but only cohort studies and case series of mostly moderate quality. The identified studies provided only a restricted basis for the guideline recommendations as their validity was limited and only outcomes of diagnostic accuracy were examined. However, decision criteria for recommending diagnostic strategies significantly comprise judgements about required resources and availability of diagnostic imaging procedures. These criteria as well as patient out-comes were mostly implicit and should be explicated in future. In order to increase the relevance of evidence reviews for oncological diagnosis, high quality studies which examine resources and patient-centred outcomes for diagnostic strategies are required.

Effect of a gel retainment dam on automated ultrasound coverage in a dual-modality breast imaging system

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this work was to evaluate a possible improvement in ultrasound coverage for a dual-modality breast imaging system in the mammographic geometry.

METHODS

A pilot study was performed to evaluate use of a rubber dam to retain ultrasound gel and improve imaging coverage at the breast periphery on a combined imaging system consisting of an ultrasound scanner and a digital x-ray tomosynthesis unit. Several dams were constructed to encompass the shapes of various sizes of compressed breasts. Visual tracings of the breast-to-paddle contact area and breast periphery were made for 8 breasts to estimate coverage area. Two readers independently reviewed the resulting images and were asked to rate the overall breast image quality.

RESULTS

The percentages of breast in contact with the paddle were greater (P < .01) and the linear dimensions of breast in contact with the paddle were larger (P < .05) with the rubber dam than without it. With the dam, the mean estimated area of the breast in contact with the paddle increased 14%, whereas the mean increase in the fraction of the total breast area in contact with paddle was 30%. The difference was due to the mean total projected area of the breast decreasing 12% as the dam was pressed against it. The image quality of automated ultrasound with the rubber dam was consistently judged to be superior to that without the dam.

CONCLUSIONS

This method can enhance the absolute and percentage area of the breast in contact with the paddle, reducing noncontact gaps at the breast periphery. Gently pressing the breast periphery with the dam inserted toward the chest wall improves coverage in automated breast ultrasound scanning.

Role of Breast Ultrasound for the Detection and Differentiation of Breast Lesions

Diagnosis of breast cancer has been widely improved since the development of high-resolution ultrasound equipment. In the past, ultrasound was only considered useful for the diagnosis of cysts. Meanwhile, it improves the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions, local preoperative staging and guided interventional diagnosis. In dense breasts, mammography has limited sensitivity. Furthermore, women with dense parenchyma have a highly increased risk of breast cancer development. Ultrasound is useful to examine dense breast tissue. Recent studies have shown that the detection of small cancers with high-resolution ultrasound is increased by 3-4 cancers per 1,000 women without clinical or mammographic abnormalities. Furthermore, stage distribution is similar between mammographically and sonographically detected carcinomas. Ultrasound is routinely used for curative diagnosis, to overcome the limitations of mammography. However, within the mammographic screening in Germany, breast density is not considered as important. Ultrasound is only used if a suspicious lesion is detected by mammography. Interestingly, 2 years ago, a screening project started in Austria in which ultrasound is always added in cases of dense breasts. Preliminary data show that the detection of additional carcinomas is increased in the same order as shown in previous studies. Therefore, an improved cancer detection and differentiation can be expected with high-resolution ultrasound.

Ultrasound is a useful adjunct to mammography in the assessment of breast tumours in all patients

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound is the first-line breast imaging modality in younger patients and an adjunct to mammography in older patients. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the complementary value of ultrasound to mammography in breast cancer and to investigate the use of ultrasound in patients above and below the age of 50 years.

METHODS

Clinical presentation and investigations for consecutive patients undergoing triple assessment at a symptomatic breast clinic were prospectively recorded between January 2000 and August 2003. Clinical data were compared with pathological findings. Patients were divided into two groups, above and below 50 years of age for subgroup analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 999 of 2185 patients had both mammography and ultrasound investigations performed and constituted the study population. Subgroup analysis of the 2185 patients demonstrated that 99 of the 127 patients who were diagnosed with breast cancer had both investigations performed (median age 57.0, range: 34-89 years). Mammography was normal/benign in 14.1%, indeterminate in 29.3% and suspicious of cancer in 56.6% of patients. Adjunctive ultrasound was normal/benign in 13.1%, indeterminate in 6.1% and suspicious of cancer in 80.8% of patients. In these 99 patients, adjunctive ultrasound was more sensitive than mammogram alone (80.8% vs. 56.6%, p < 0.001). Ultrasound upgraded nine of 14 mammographically normal and 16 of 29 mammographically indeterminate X-rays to a cancer. Mammography appeared to be more sensitive in patients over 50 years compared with those patients under 50 years (62.5% vs. 45.7%, p = 0.10). The sensitivity of ultrasound was comparable between patients above and below the age of 50 years (82.8% vs. 77.1%, p = 0.60). Further subgroup analysis demonstrated a higher sensitivity with combined mammography and ultrasound compared with mammography alone in either patient group (below 50: 45.7%-->77.1% and above 50: 62.5%-->82.8%). These results also suggested that the difference in the sensitivities of mammography vs. the combined investigation approach was more marked in patients under 50 years of age (below 50 = 31.4% vs. above 50 = 20.3%).

CONCLUSION

Adjunctive ultrasound assessment improves breast cancer detection in women of all ages and should be routinely used in symptomatic breast clinics.

Spatial registration of temporally separated whole breast 3D ultrasound images

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential for use of image volume based registration (IVBaR) to aid in measurement of changes in the tumor during chemotherapy of breast cancer. Successful IVBaR could aid in the detection of such changes in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and potentially be useful for routine breast cancer screening and diagnosis. IVBaR was employed in a new method of automated estimation of tumor volume in studies following the radiologist identification of the tumor region in the prechemotherapy scan. The authors have also introduced a new semiautomated method for validation of registration based on Doppler ultrasound (U.S.) signals that are independent of the grayscale signals used for registration. This Institutional Review Board approved study was conducted on 10 patients undergoing chemotherapy and 14 patients with a suspicious/unknown mass scheduled to undergo biopsy. Reasonably reproducible mammographic positioning and nearly whole breast U.S. imaging were achieved. The image volume was registered offline with a mutual information cost function and global interpolation based on a thin-plate spline using MIAMI FUSE software developed at the University of Michigan. The success and accuracy of registration of the three dimensional (3D) U.S. image volume were measured by means of mean registration error (MRE). IVBaR was successful with MRE of 4.3 +/- 1.7 mm in 9 out of 10 reproducibility automated breast ultrasound (ABU) studies and in 12 out of 17 ABU image pairs collected before, during, or after 115 +/- 14 days of chemotherapy. Semiautomated tumor volume estimation was performed on registered image volumes giving 86 +/- 8% mean accuracy compared to the radiologist hand-segmented tumor volume on seven cases. Doppler studies yielded fractional volume of color pixels in the region surrounding the lesion and its change with changing breast compression. The Doppler study of patients with detectable blood flow included five patients with suspicious masses and three undergoing chemotherapy. Spatial alignment of the 3D blood vessel data from the Doppler studies provided independent measures for the validation of registration. In 15 Doppler image volume pairs scanned with differing breast compression, the mean centerline separation value was 1.5 +/- 0.6 mm, while MRE based on a few identifiable structural points common to the two grayscale image volumes was 1.1 +/- 0.6 mm. Another measure, the overlap ratio of blood vessels, was shown to increase from 0.32 to 0.59 (+84%) with IVBaR for pairs at various compression levels. These results show that successful registration of ABU scans may be accomplished for comparison and integration of information.

Breast tomosynthesis in clinical practice: initial results

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the potential value of tomosynthesis in women with an abnormal screening mammogram or with clinical symptoms. Mammography and tomosynthesis investigations of 513 woman with an abnormal screening mammogram or with clinical symptoms were prospectively classified according to the ACR BI-RADS criteria. Sensitivity and specificity of both techniques for the detection of cancer were calculated. In 112 newly detected cancers, tomosynthesis and mammography were each false-negative in 8 cases (7%). In the false-negative mammography cases, the tumor was detected with ultrasound (n = 4), MRI (n = 2), by recall after breast tomosynthesis interpretation (n = 1), and after prophylactic mastectomy (n = 1). Combining the results of mammography and tomosynthesis detected 109 cancers. Therefore in three patients, both mammography and tomosynthesis missed the carcinoma. The sensitivity of both techniques for the detection of breast cancer was 92.9%, and the specificity of mammography and tomosynthesis was 86.1 and 84.4%, respectively. Tomosynthesis can be used as an additional technique to mammography in patients referred with an abnormal screening mammogram or with clinical symptoms. Additional lesions detected by tomosynthesis, however, are also likely to be detected by other techniques used in the clinical work-up of these patients.

A comparison of mammography and ultrasonography in the evaluation of breast masses

AIM

Aim of the study is to evaluate breast masses using mammography (MG) and ultrasonography (USG) independently and in combination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our study group consisted of 62 female patients, with breast symptoms such as palpable lumps, pain in the breast and nipple discharge who were examined prospectively over a period of 6 months. All 62 patients were examined by both MG and USG independently. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) or core cut biopsy was done according to the findings of MG and USG and then the results were correlated with each modality finding.

RESULTS

According to this study MG showed an efficiency of 81.8 % compared to 95.5 % for USG in detecting fibrocystic mastitis. However their combined approach resulted in 100 %. In the case of fibroadenomas, MG showed 75 % efficiency and USG only 35 % and the combination resulting in 93.7 %. For carcinomas, MG had an efficiency of 77.8 % and USG 55.6 %, but the combination had an efficiency of 98.1 %. Overall, the histopathological results when correlated with each modality finding showed that MG had an efficiency of only 77.4 % and USG only 69.8 % when used alone in detecting these lesions of the breast compared to an efficiency of 98.1 % obtained by their combined approach. In our study, we showed that there was no significant difference in sensitivity between MG and USG (p = 0.3768) but there was significant difference in MG alone and MG-USG combination (p = 0.0015) and USG alone and USG-MG combination (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Our study confirmed that combined MG and USG had higher sensitivity rate than the sensitivity rate observed for either single modality. The diagnostic accuracy for carcinomas of the breast appear to improve when MG was combined with USG, even in cases which showed no evidence of microcalcification or other signs of abnormalities. Our study implies that, USG may be the only viable modality in pregnant and lactating women as it does not involve ionizing radiation and also in dense breast tissue, as density is a limiting factor for MG.

The role of various modalities in breast imaging

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer in women worldwide. Mammography is considered the "gold standard" in the evaluation of the breast from an imaging perspective. Apart from mammography, ultrasound examination and magnetic resonance imaging are being offered as adjuncts to the preoperative workup. Recently, other new modalities like positron emission tomography, 99mTc-sestamibi scintimammography, and electrical impedance tomography (EIT) are also being offered. However, there is still controversy over the most appropriate use of these new modalities. Based on the literature, this review evaluates the role of various modalities used in the screening and diagnosis of breast cancer.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Based on relevant literatures this article gives an overview of the old and new modalities used in the field of breast imaging. A narrative literature review of all the relevant papers known to the authors was conducted. The search of literatures was done using pubmed and ovid search engines. Additional references were found through bibliography reviews of relevant articles. It was clear that though various new technics and methods have emerged, none have substituted mammography and it is still the only proven screening method for the breast as of date.

CONCLUSION

From the literature it is clear that apropos modern radiology's impact on diagnosis, staging and patient follow-up, only one imaging technique has had a significant impact on screening asymptomatic individuals for cancer i.e.; low-dose mammography. Mammography is the only screening test proven in breast imaging. Positron emission tomography (PET) also plays an important role in staging breast cancer and monitoring treatment response. As imaging techniques improve, the role of imaging will continue to evolve with the goal remaining a decrease in breast cancer morbidity and mortality. Progress in the development and commercialisation of EIT breast imaging system will definitely help to promote other systems and applications based on the EIT and similar visualization methods. Breast ultrasound and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are frequently used adjuncts to mammography in today's clinical practice and these techniques enhance the radiologist's ability to detect cancer and assess disease extent, which is crucial in treatment planning and staging.

Investigation of suspected breast cancer

The local extent of breast cancer is often detected only at surgery, but modern imaging may be able to give us this information preoperatively instead

Breast imaging and needle biopsy in women with clinically evident breast cancer: Does combined imaging change overall diagnostic sensitivity?

Combining mammography and ultrasound improves the sensitivity of imaging diagnosis. In the context of clinical masses, where percutaneous needle biopsy is routinely incorporated into the diagnostic pathway, little is known about the incremental gain in sensitivity where using single relative to combined imaging. We examined the sensitivity of imaging and needle biopsy combinations in a cohort of 1000 women with clinically evident (clinically presenting and/or clinically palpable) breast cancer. We report the distribution of age, tumour stage and node status, clinical findings, and individual test outcomes in all subjects. Sensitivity--true positive rate for cancer detection--of different test combinations (with the number of cases missed in 1000 subjects given in parentheses) is: mammography and ultrasound 97.9% (21); mammography with needle biopsy 99.5% (5); ultrasound with needle biopsy 99.5% (5); combined imaging with needle biopsy 99.6% (4). Using only one imaging test (irrespective of whether that is mammography or ultrasound) in combination with needle biopsy provides the same sensitivity, with an incremental gain in sensitivity of 0.1% where combined imaging is included into the diagnostic pathway. This is largely due to needle biopsy identifying most cancers missed on single imaging thus negating the effect of additional imaging on overall sensitivity.

Evaluating thin compression paddles for mammographically compatible ultrasound

We are developing a combined digital mammography/3D ultrasound system to improve detection and/or characterization of breast lesions. Ultrasound scanning through a mammographic paddle could significantly reduce signal level, degrade beam focusing and create reverberations. Thus, appropriate paddle choice is essential for accurate sonographic lesion detection and assessment with this system. In this study, we characterized ultrasound image quality through paddles of varying materials (lexan, polyurethane, TPX, mylar) and thicknesses (0.25 to 2.5 mm). Analytical experiments focused on lexan and TPX, which preliminary results demonstrated were most competitive. Spatial and contrast resolution, side-lobe and range lobe levels, contrast and signal strength were compared with no-paddle images. When the beamforming of the system was corrected to account for imaging through the paddle, the TPX 2.5 mm paddle performed the best. Test objects imaged through this paddle demonstrated < or = 15% reduction in spatial resolution, < or = 7.5 dB signal loss, < or = 3 dB contrast loss and range lobe levels > or = 35 dB below signal maximum over 4 cm. TPX paddles <2.5 mm could also be used with this system, depending on imaging goals. In 10 human subjects with cysts, small CNR losses were observed but were determined to be statistically insignificant. Radiologists concluded that 75% of cysts in through-paddle scans were at least as detectable as in their corresponding direct-contact scans.

Negative Predictive Value of Sonography and Mammography in Patients with Focal Breast Pain

The purpose of this study was to determine the negative predictive value of mammography and sonography in a population of patients with focal breast pain referred for imaging evaluation. Eighty-six consecutive patients with focal breast pain in the absence of a breast mass were retrospectively identified from an imaging database. The electronic inpatient and outpatient records for the 86 patients were reviewed. For patients who were diagnosed with breast cancer, pathology reports were reviewed to determine whether the painful area corresponded to the patient's cancer. In addition, patient records were linked to the institution's cancer registry. Of the 86 patients, 26 patients were lost to follow-up and did not appear in the institution's cancer registry. Four patients were diagnosed with breast carcinoma, two of whom had incidental cancers that were detected mammographically by microcalcifications and were separate from and unrelated to the area of pain. Seven patients underwent biopsy at the site of breast pain with benign diagnosis. Imaging and clinical follow-up for the 51 patients with benign or negative imaging at the site of pain showed no abnormality with a mean follow-up of 26.5 months. The negative predictive value of mammography and sonography in patients with breast pain was 100%. The negative predictive value of mammography and sonography for focal breast pain is high. Negative mammography and sonography can be reassuring to the treating clinician if follow-up is planned when physical examination is not suspicious. However, if physical examination is suspicious, biopsy should not be delayed.

Automated quantitative volumetric breast ultrasound data-acquisition system

This paper describes the development and initial testing of an automated ultrasound imaging technique to acquire quantitative volumetric breast data; the clinical application being breast cancer diagnosis and management. A novel mechanical scanner has been designed and constructed to constrain the breast tissue without compromising the image, to acquire images of the majority of the breast using a conventional B-mode scanner and to maintain patient comfort. An algorithm to improve upon simple depth-dependent amplification by compensating for tissue-dependent attenuation is applied to the images, making the grey-scale values represent local scattering properties more closely. Registration techniques have been developed to correct for geometric errors arising in the data set because of tissue movement and variations in speed of sound in the tissues. The data sets are reconstructed into volumes and viewed interactively. A pilot study of seven patients was performed and selected results are presented to illustrate lesion features. The automated scan reduces operator-dependence, provides clear information on the 3-D tissue boundaries and provides a full record for monitoring or surgical planning.

The influence of knowledge of mammography findings on the accuracy of breast ultrasound in symptomatic women

Breast ultrasound is generally interpreted with knowledge of the mammographic examination. This study examined the influence of knowledge of mammography findings on the accuracy of ultrasound in women with breast symptoms. Subjects were sampled from all women 25-55 years of age consecutively attending a breast clinic. This included all 240 women shown to have breast cancer and 240 age-matched women shown not to have cancer. Ultrasound films were prospectively reviewed and reported by two radiologists independent of each other and in a blinded manner. A two-phase design was used. In the first phase, the radiologists provided an opinion on the ultrasound films. In the second phase, the ultrasound films were reread with consideration of the corresponding mammographic examination. The accuracy of reading the ultrasound with and without knowledge of the findings on mammography was compared using sensitivity and specificity, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. Reporting the ultrasound with knowledge of mammography (compared to without mammography) improved sensitivity and reduced specificity for both radiologists. For one reader, sensitivity increased from 77.5% to 86.7% (p = 0.0002) and specificity decreased from 89.7% to 85.4% (p = 0.04). For the other reader, sensitivity increased from 81.3% to 87.5% (p = 0.0023) and specificity decreased from 87.1% to 85.0% (p = 0.27). ROC curves for both radiologists showed that reporting ultrasound with knowledge of mammography resulted in small (about 3%), but significant improvement in the area under the ROC curve. Our study indicates that knowledge of the findings of mammography improves the interpretation of breast ultrasound in symptomatic women.

Contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography in breast lesions: effect on differential diagnosis after mammography and gray scale sonography

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions after a mammography-gray scale sonography combination.

METHODS

Sixty-eight patients with 69 breast masses underwent power Doppler sonography before and after intravenous injection of a contrast agent. The lesions were diagnosed as "highly suggestive of malignancy" (category 5; n = 32), "suspicious" (category 4; n = 21), and "probably benign" (category 3; n = 16) by mammography and gray scale sonography, modeled on the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System classification. Power Doppler findings did not affect patient treatment. The authors subjectively evaluated the estimated area of vascularity, degree of enhancement following contrast agent administration, morphologic features, and distribution of vessels within the lesions.

RESULTS

The final diagnoses were malignant in 28 lesions and benign in 41. Significant enhancement after contrast agent injection was detected in both the malignant and benign groups. Only 2 criteria, estimated area of vascularity and degree of enhancement following contrast agent administration, proved to be significant diagnostic determinants for contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography (P < .001; interobserver agreements, 74.4 and 77.8, respectively). Contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography provided a higher specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value than power Doppler sonography but a lower sensitivity and negative predictive value than mammography-gray scale sonography. Only in the category 4 lesions could the combination of mammography-gray scale sonography and contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography accomplish a higher specificity (71%) and positive predictive value (70%) than mammography-gray scale sonography (39% and 53%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Power Doppler and contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography cannot be recommended as confirmatory tests in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3 and category 5 lesions. Although contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography may help reduce unnecessary biopsies in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 4 lesions, recommendation of its use has many drawbacks, such as imperfectly established criteria, lack of absolute certainty, and high cost.

Normal mammography and ultrasonography in the setting of palpable breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Each year thousands of women present to general surgeons with palpable breast masses, some of which are clinically ambiguous and the majority of which are benign. In addition, surgeons are frequently faced with the question of whether to biopsy those palpable abnormalities in the setting of normal radiographic studies. One might propose that such lesions could be safely observed rather than immediately biopsied. If these lesions were not biopsied, how many cancers would escape detection? To address this issue, a population of patients with known, palpable breast cancer was retrospectively examined to determine the frequency of normal or benign findings on both mammography and ultrasonography.

METHODS

Between January 1998 and December 2001, 351 women with breast carcinoma presented initially with palpable tumors. The medical records of these remaining 351 cases were retrospectively reviewed to examine the radiographic characteristics of the palpable carcinomas.

RESULTS

Of the 351 cases in the study group, 13 (3.7%) patients with palpable breast cancers had mammogram and sonogram examinations that were both normal, benign, or nonspecific in appearance.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that nearly 4% of women with breast cancer who present with palpable lumps will have normal or benign findings on both mammography and ultrasonography. These data support prior studies of similar false negative rates and may provide some reassurance to surgeons and patients regarding clinical breast lumps, as the decision of whether to biopsy still rests in the surgeon's hands. However, inappropriate reliance on these tests for an evaluation of a palpable abnormality will result in a number of missed tumors.

Sydney Breast Imaging Accuracy Study: Comparative sensitivity and specificity of mammography and sonography in young women with symptoms

OBJECTIVE

We examined the age-specific sensitivity and specificity of mammography and sonography in symptomatic women to determine the age below which sonography may be the more accurate imaging test, which may guide the choice of initial breast imaging examination based on the woman's age.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four hundred eighty subjects were sampled from all women consecutively attending a symptomatic breast clinic between 1994 and 1996 and ranging in age from 25 to 55 years. We included all 240 women shown to have breast cancer (thus avoiding selection bias) and 240 age-matched women shown not to have cancer. Mammograms and sonograms were prospectively interpreted independently and without knowledge of age by two radiologists in a blinded manner, with a third radiologist arbitrating disagreements. Sensitivity and specificity of each imaging test in relation to age were examined using logistic regression modeling, and accuracy was compared using the chi-square test for paired proportions.

RESULTS

Sensitivity and specificity of each test were not linearly associated with age; however, the sensitivity of mammography increased substantially in women older than 50 years. Sonographic sensitivity of 81.7% was not significantly greater than mammographic sensitivity of 75.8% (chi(2)(1) = 2.06, p = 0.15). However, in women 45 years old or younger, the sensitivity of sonography was 13.2% (95% confidence interval, 2.1-24.3%) greater than that of mammography. The specificity of both tests was approximately 88.0%.

CONCLUSION

These data show that sonography is the more accurate imaging test in women 45 years old or younger who present with breast symptoms and may be an appropriate initial imaging examination.

Prospective evaluation of the value of combined mammographic and sonographic assessment in patients with palpable abnormalities of the breast

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of combined mammographic and sonographic imaging in patients with palpable abnormalities of the breast.

METHODS

Four hundred eleven consecutive cases of palpable abnormalities of the breast underwent combined mammographic and sonographic evaluation. Patients who did not undergo biopsy had imaging and clinical follow-up; the mean follow-up period was 28.9 months (range, 24-33 months).

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-five (40.1%) of 411 palpable abnormalities had a benign assessment; 97 (58.7%) of the 165 benign lesions were visible on both mammography and sonography; 66 (40%) of 165 benign lesions were mammographically occult and identified at sonographic evaluation. In 60 (14.6%) of the 411 cases, imaging evaluation resulted in a suspicious assessment; 49 (81.7%) of the 60 lesions categorized as suspicious underwent biopsy; 14 (28.5%) of 49 lesions were histologically proved to be carcinoma. Nineteen (31.6%) of the 60 lesions categorized as suspicious were mammographically occult and identified only on sonography; 14 (73.7%) of these 19 lesions underwent biopsy; 12 (63.1%) of 19 were benign, and 2 (10.5%) were malignant. One hundred eighty-six (45.2%) of the 411 palpable abnormalities had negative imaging assessment findings; 12 patients with negative imaging findings underwent biopsy, and all had benign findings. The sensitivity (14 of 14) and negative predictive value (186 of 186) for a combined mammographic and sonographic assessment were 100%; the specificity was 80.1% (186 of 232).

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer was diagnosed in 14 (3.4%) of 411 women who underwent combined imaging for palpable abnormalities of the breast. Combined mammographic and sonographic assessment was shown to be very helpful in identifying benign as well as malignant lesions causing palpable abnormalities of the breast.

Minimal invasive complete excision of benign breast tumors using a three-dimensional ultrasound-guided mammotome vacuum device

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of three-dimensional (3D) ultrasonography in the complete excision of benign breast tumors using ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted core-needle biopsy (Mammotome). A protocol for the management of benign breast tumors is proposed.

METHOD

Twenty consecutive patients with sonographically benign breast lesions underwent 3D ultrasound-guided mammotome biopsy under local anesthesia. The indication for surgical biopsy was a solid lesion with benign characteristics on both two-dimensional (2D) and 3D ultrasound imaging, increasing in size over time or causing pain or irritation. Preoperatively, the size of the lesion was assessed using 2D and 3D volumetry. During vacuum biopsy the needle was visualized sonographically in all three dimensions, including the coronal plane. Excisional biopsy was considered complete when no residual tumor tissue could be seen sonographically. Ultrasonographic follow-up examinations were performed on the following day and 3-6 months later to assess residual tissue and scarring.

RESULTS

All lesions were histologically benign. Follow-up examinations revealed complete excision of all lesions of < 1.5 mL in volume as assessed by 3D volumetry. 3D ultrasonographic volume assessment was more accurate than 2D using the ellipsoid formula or assessment of the maximum diameter for the prediction of complete excision of the tumor. No bleeding or infections occurred postoperatively and no scarring was seen ultrasonographically on follow-up examinations.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy allows complete excision of benign breast lesions that are </=1.5 mL in volume (calculated by 3D volumetry), and thus avoids open surgery and postoperative scarring. Under local anesthesia it is a safe procedure with optimal compliance. 3D ultrasound offers the advantage of better preoperative demonstration of the lesions' margins, resulting in better assessment of volumetry, improved intraoperative needle location and perioperative identification of residual tumor tissue. 3D sonographically guided biopsy should be integrated into breast cancer screening programs as a safe therapeutic option for breast lesions presumed to be benign.

Prospective evaluation of the value of negative sonographic and mammographic findings in patients with palpable abnormalities of the breast

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the value of combined negative sonographic and mammographic findings in patients with palpable breast abnormalities.

METHODS

One hundred seventy-two patients with 186 palpable abnormalities who had combined negative sonographic and mammographic findings were prospectively studied. Patients who did not undergo biopsy had imaging and clinical follow-up; the mean follow-up period was 28.9 months (range, 24-33 months).

RESULTS

Twelve patients underwent biopsy; benign histologic diagnoses were reported in all 12 (12 [6.9%] of 172). In the remaining 160 patients who were followed, there was no interval development of breast cancer at the site of the palpable abnormality. The negative predictive value of combined negative mammographic and sonographic findings in a patient with a palpable abnormality of the breast was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that in a patient with a palpable abnormality of the breast, the negative predictive value of combined normal sonographic and mammographic findings is very high and is therefore reassuring to the patient.

Palpable breast thickening: role of mammography and US in cancer detection

PURPOSE

To determine the frequency of breast carcinoma and ascertain the diagnostic yield of mammography and breast ultrasonography (US) in the detection of breast carcinoma in women with palpable breast thickening.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred twenty-three consecutive cases of breast thickening (103 patients) during a 1-year period were reviewed. Experienced breast examiners prospectively identified patients with breast thickening. Results of diagnostic mammographic work-up, breast US, breast biopsy, and clinical follow-up were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Six (5%) of 123 cases had a diagnosis of breast carcinoma; five (83%) of the six had invasive carcinoma. Mammography was performed in all cases, US in 77 (63%) cases. Mammographic sensitivity for invasive cancer detection was 60% (three of five cases), specificity was 94% (102 of 108 cases), and negative predictive value was 97% (102 of 105 cases). Sensitivity of US alone was 100% (two of two cases), specificity was 96% (65 of 68 cases), and negative predictive value was 100% (65 of 65 cases). The combined negative predictive value of mammography and US was 100%. Patients with prior biopsies at the site of palpable thickening accounted for most false-negative mammograms. Median time to initiate follow-up of patients in whom biopsy was not performed was 14 months.

CONCLUSION

Breast cancer was discovered in 5% of women with palpable breast thickening. Women with negative mammograms and US scans are at low risk for cancer but should, in our opinion, be followed up at short-term intervals with clinical examination and imaging if biopsy is not elected by their surgeon or clinician.

The role of ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammography in the detection of breast cancer. a systematic review

The aim of this review was to summarise the diagnostic performance of ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammography in the detection of breast cancer and to identify clinical indications. A systematic review was performed of all publications in MEDLINE and EMBASE between 1990 and 2000 on the role of ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammography. 22 studies were included, showing a large variety of indications for ultrasonography and variations in the diagnostic performance of mammography and ultrasonography. There were six studies comparing a combined diagnosis of mammography and ultrasonography together with mammography alone, of which three studies had an increased sensitivity at the cost of a lower specificity. The methods of selecting the study population and interpretation of ultrasonography significantly influenced the diagnostic performance of mammography and ultrasonography relative to each other (P=0.003, P=0.03, respectively). Based on the studies reviewed, little evidence-based support was found to confirm the well recognised value of ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammography in the detection of breast cancer in clinical practice. Furthermore, no clinical indications for additional ultrasonography could be defined. The heterogeneity in the diagnostic performance in these studies may be explained by the methods of patient selection and ultrasonography interpretation, as well as by their poor quality.

The comparative sensitivity of mammography and ultrasound in women with breast symptoms: an age-specific analysis

Despite its importance for clinical policy, there is little research on the age at which ultrasound or mammography is the preferred initial diagnostic test in women with breast symptoms. We analysed data from a series of 3799 consecutively presenting cancers. The overall sensitivity was 77.6% for mammography and 80.5% for ultrasound. Sensitivity increased with age in both mammography and ultrasound, though more steeply for mammography. In the 975 women who had both tests, ultrasound had a higher sensitivity than mammography in women younger than 62 years of age, whereas mammography had a higher sensitivity than ultrasound in women older than 62 years. However, if the test results of the 2393 women who had mammography only are compared with the ultrasound results of the 975 women who had both tests, the 'cross-over' age at which the sensitivity of the two tests is equal occurs at the earlier age of 48 years. The presence of a palpable finding increases the sensitivity of ultrasound but does not influence the sensitivity of mammography.