Evaluation of a new sulfadoxine sensitivity assay in vitro for field isolates of Plasmodium falciparum

Molecular epidemiology of malaria in Cameroon. XXVII. Clinical and parasitological response to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine treatment and Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropteroate synthase alleles in Cameroonian children

The rapidly changing epidemiology of antifolate-resistant Plasmodium falciparum in Africa requires monitoring. The present study was designed to assess the degree of association between the clinical and parasitological response to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and allelic combinations of dihydrofolate reductase (dhfr) and dihydropteroate synthase (dhps) genes. Of 357 children who completed the 14-day follow-up, an adequate clinical and parasitological response was observed in 316 patients (88.5%) and early and late failures occurred in 18 (5%) and 23 (6.4%, mostly due to recrudescence) patients, respectively. The majority of clinical isolates were characterized as "quadruple" (n=196, 55.2%; N51I-C59R-S108N in DHFR and A437G in DHPS) or "triple" mutants (n=97, 27.3%; N51I-C59R-S108N in DHFR and wild-type DHPS; S108N+N51I or C59R in DHFR and A437G in DHPS). Wild-type, single mutation, and double mutation were observed in 29, 20, and 13 parasites, respectively. The comparison of different sets of mutations and early or late failures did not reveal any molecular marker associated with treatment outcome when the follow-up period was limited to 14 days (P>0.05). In this study, the determination of dhfr-dhps genotypes was of limited value to predict the treatment outcome in individual patients, mostly due to few treatment failures and few wild-type haplotypes. Further monitoring will be required to define the relationship between clinical response to SP therapy and parasite genotypes in our epidemiological setting.

Resistance to sulphadrug-based antifolate therapy in malaria: are we looking in the right place?

Sulphadrug treatment failure in malaria therapy cannot solely be ascribed to the build-up of genetic resistance within the parasitic genome. Although numerous in vitro studies have tried to determine the exact genetic markers that could predict treatment outcome in patients, this research has not been conclusive. Sulphadrugs work by competitive inhibition with pABA at one point of the pathway to de novo folate synthesis. However, evidence suggests that the malaria parasite is capable of overcoming this competitive inhibition by switching over to other metabolic pathways, like direct folate salvage from a person's bloodstream. In other words, increased folic acid administration, via diet or supplementation, may have reduced the effectiveness of sulphadrugs more than genetic mutations. Although in vitro studies are valuable for understanding disease mechanisms, we should not forget that the human being is infinitely more complex than any laboratory model.

Mechanisms of resistance of malaria parasites to antifolates

Antifolate antimalarial drugs interfere with folate metabolism, a pathway essential to malaria parasite survival. This class of drugs includes effective causal prophylactic and therapeutic agents, some of which act synergistically when used in combination. Unfortunately, the antifolates have proven susceptible to resistance in the malaria parasite. Resistance is caused by point mutations in dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropteroate synthase, the two key enzymes in the folate biosynthetic pathway that are targeted by the antifolates. Resistance to these drugs arises relatively rapidly in response to drug pressure and is now common worldwide. Nevertheless, antifolate drugs remain first-line agents in several sub-Saharan African countries where chloroquine resistance is widespread, at least partially because they remain the only affordable, effective alternative. New antifolate combinations that are more effective against resistant parasites are being developed and in one case, recently introduced into use. Combining these antifolates with drugs that act on different targets in the parasite should greatly enhance their effectiveness as well as deter the development of resistance. Molecular epidemiological techniques for monitoring parasite drug resistance may contribute to development of strategies for prolonging the useful therapeutic life of this important class of drugs.

Evolution of resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in Plasmodium falciparum

The development of resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine by Plasmodium parasites is a major problem for the effective treatment of malaria, especially P. falciparum malaria. Although the molecular basis for parasite resistance is known, the factors promoting the development and transmission of these resistant parasites are less clear. This paper reports the results of a quantitative comparison of factors previously hypothesized as important for the development of drug resistance, drug dosage, time of treatment, and drug elimination half-life, with an in-host dynamics model of P. falciparum malaria in a malaria-naïve host. The results indicate that the development of drug resistance can be categorized into three stages. The first is the selection of existing parasites with genetic mutations in the dihydrofolate reductase or dihydropteroate synthetase gene. This selection is driven by the long half-life of the sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine combination. The second stage involves the selection of parasites with allelic types of higher resistance within the host during an infection. The timing of treatment relative to initiation of a specific anti-P. falciparum EMP1 immune response is an important factor during this stage, as is the treatment dosage. During the third stage, clinical treatment failure becomes prevalent as the parasites develop sufficient resistance mutations to survive therapeutic doses of the drug combination. Therefore, the model output reaffirms the importance of correct treatment of confirmed malaria cases in slowing the development of parasite resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine.

Dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropteroate synthase genotypes associated with in vitro resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to pyrimethamine, trimethoprim, sulfadoxine, and sulfamethoxazole

A total of 70 Plasmodium falciparum isolates were tested in vitro against pyrimethamine (PYR), trimethoprim (TRM), sulfadoxine (SDX), and sulfamethoxazole (SMX), and their dihydrofolate reductase (dhfr) and dihydropteroate synthase (dhps) genotypes were determined. dhfr genotypes correlated with PYR and TRM drug responses (r = 0.93 and 0.85). Isolates with wild-type alleles showed mean half inhibitory concentrations (IC50 +/- SD) of 0.10 +/- 0.10 and 0.15 +/- 0.06 microg/100 microl for PYR and TRM. Parasites with mutations at codons 108 and 51 alone or combined with codon 59 have IC50 of 11.46 +/- 0.86 (PYR) and 2.90 +/- 0.59 microg/100 microl (TRM). For both drugs, the differences in the mean IC50 between wild and mutant parasites were statistically significant (P < 0.001). Isolates with mixed wild and mutant alleles showed an intermediate level of susceptibility. Our data show partial cross-resistance between PYR/TRM and SDX/SMX (r = 0.85 and 0.65). Correlation was not observed between different dhps genotypes and the in vitro outcome to SDX and SMX (r = 0.30 and 0.34). The lack of correlation could be due to folates and para-aminobenzoic acid in the RPMI medium and the serum used to supplement the cultures.

Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance in the rodent malaria parasite Plasmodium chabaudi

We have studied resistance to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (S/P) in the rodent malaria parasite Plasmodium chabaudi. A stable S/P-resistant mutant, AS(50S/P), was selected by drug treatment of a clone, AS(PYR), already resistant to pyrimethamine. The sequences of the P. chabaudi dhfr and dhps genes were obtained and found to be identical in AS(50S/P) and AS(PYR), showing that resistance to S/P in AS(50S/P) was not due to additional mutations in either gene. AS(50S/P) was crossed with a drug-sensitive clone, AJ, and 16 independent recombinant progeny were obtained. These clones were phenotyped for their susceptibility to S/P and to sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine separately. Pyrimethamine resistance was invariably associated with S/P resistance, but no correlation was found between resistance to S/P and resistance to sulfadoxine. Quantitative trait locus analysis of the progeny with 31 chromosome-specific markers showed that mutant P. chabaudi dhfr, or one or more genes closely linked to it, was a major determinant of S/P resistance. In addition, the inheritance of genes on chromosomes 5 and 13 from the sensitive parent appeared to contribute to the level of resistance observed. These results demonstrate that the S/P resistance of the AS(50S/P) mutant of P. chabaudi does not involve mutation in dhps and is not due simply to a combination of two genes determining resistance to pyrimethamine and sulfadoxine separately.