IL-2 antibody induction and the outcome of pediatric renal transplants

Induction therapy in pediatric kidney transplant recipients discharged with a triple drug immunosuppressive regimen

We evaluated the effectiveness of induction therapy on transplant outcomes during 2004-2007 in the United States. We retrospectively reviewed OPTN/UNOS registry and selected kidney pediatric (<21-yr) recipients that received no induction (NoIND), IL-2RA, or rabbit anti-THY and were discharged with a triple drug immunosuppressive maintenance regimen, including steroids. Of 2932 recipients, 20%, 36%, and 43% were in NoIND, THY, and IL-2RA groups, respectively. The majority received tacrolimus (88%) and MMF (89%) at discharge. There was no association of induction with the risk of acute rejection even after adjusting for known cofounders. Compared to NoIND, IL2-RA, but not THY, had a modest decrease (3%) in absolute rate of graft loss and was associated with a risk reduction ratio of 0.51 (95% CI, 0.31-0.84) in one-yr graft loss. At three yr, no induction agent was associated with decreased graft loss. In conclusion, induction agents were used in 80% of pediatric kidney recipients discharged with a triple drug immunosuppressive maintenance regimen between 2004-2007 in the United States. Neither THY nor IL-2RA was associated with reduced rejection episodes. The use of induction therapy was not associated with improvement in three-yr graft survival.

Two-dose daclizumab induction in pediatric renal transplantation

DCZ, an IL-2 receptor antagonist, has been widely used for induction therapy in pediatric and adult solid organ transplantation. Originally, it was recommended as a five-dose regimen; however, fewer doses may be efficacious and less costly for prevention of rejection. There is limited experience with the use of fewer doses in pediatric renal transplantation. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 26 primary pediatric renal transplants performed at a single center between June 2004 and May 2007 receiving induction therapy with two-dose DCZ (1.5 mg/kg preoperatively and day seven post-transplant). Maintenance immunosuppression included tacrolimus, MMF, and prednisone in all patients. Forty-six percent were African American and 92% were deceased-donor transplants. After a mean follow-up of 17.8 +/- 7.5 months, acute rejection was noted in 11.5% and graft survival was 92.3%. CMV infection occurred in 11.5%, but no case of BK nephropathy or post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder was observed. Our preliminary results suggest that induction therapy with two-dose DCZ was convenient, economical, and effective in preventing rejection episodes without an increase in adverse events or hospital stay. Larger randomized clinical trials with longer duration of follow-up are needed to more fully validate the use of this regimen in pediatric renal transplantation.

Induction therapy in pediatric renal transplant recipients: an overview

Induction therapy to prevent the acute rejection of mismatched allografts with the ultimate aim of prolonging the life of the allograft has been the cornerstone of immunosuppression since the introduction of renal transplantation. Agents used for induction therapy have changed over time. Their role in transplantation is expanding to include corticosteroid avoidance and immunosuppression minimization. This review provides an overview of induction therapies for renal transplantation including historic therapies such as total lymphoid irradiation and Minnesota antilymphocyte globulin, and current therapies with polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies and chemical agents, with special emphasis on children. Data from adult studies, and pediatric studies whenever available, are summarized. A brief summary of experimental therapies with fingolimod and belatacept is provided. Historically, induction therapies were targeted at T cells. The role of induction therapies targeted at B cells is emerging in select groups of patients that include highly sensitized recipients and those receiving transplants from blood group incompatible donors. With the advent of newer maintenance immunosuppressive medications and with very low rates of acute rejection, induction protocols for renal transplantation need to be targeted so that excessive immunosuppression and infections are avoided. Several single-center and registry data analyses in children suggest that the addition of an interleukin (IL)-2 receptor antagonist may improve graft survival compared with no induction. The safety profile of IL-2 receptor antagonists is indistinguishable from that of placebo, with no apparent difference in the incidence of infection or post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease. IL-2 receptor antagonists and polyclonal lymphocyte-depleting antibodies offer equivalent efficacy in standard-risk populations. However, in high-risk patients, acute rejection rates and graft outcomes may be improved with the use of lymphocyte-depleting agents such as Thymoglobulin. However, cytomegalovirus infection and other infections may be more common with this therapy. Therefore, in patients at high risk of graft loss, Thymoglobulin may be the preferred choice for induction therapy, while for all other patients, IL-2 receptor antagonists should be considered the first-line choice for induction therapy. Newer lymphocyte-depleting agents such as alemtuzumab may be better utilized in minimization regimens involving one or two oral maintenance immunosuppressive agents.

Anti-IL-2 receptor antibody vs. polyclonal anti-lymphocyte antibody as induction therapy in pediatric transplantation

Current concerns in pediatric transplantation focus on chronic rejection which commonly leads to graft loss, and on long-term maintenance immunosuppression toxicity. Acute rejection has been associated with the subsequent development of chronic rejection. Therefore, induction therapy may provide potential benefits by preventing early acute rejection episodes and allowing delayed administration of calcineurin inhibitors or steroid avoidance. This review of the literature showed that induction therapy can reduce early and recurrent acute rejection episodes after pediatric solid organ transplantation. Whether this might result in better long-term graft survival has still to be confirmed. However, induction therapy has beneficial effects in high-risk recipients and allows steroid avoidance or calcineurin inhibitor minimization. Because they are very well tolerated, anti-IL-2 receptor antibodies are increasingly preferred to rabbit-antithymocyte globulin, but the former have not yet been proven to be more effective or to have less late toxicity than polyclonal agents. Benefits in early outcome and no increase in adverse events lead to recommend the use of IL-2 receptor antagonists as induction therapy after pediatric organ transplantation.

Novel immunosuppressants

Advances in maintenance immunosuppression over the past decade has resulted in dramatic improvements in short- and long-term outcomes in organ transplantation as well as a decreased incidence of acute rejection. However, immunosuppressive drugs need to be given long term, lack specificity, and are accompanied by adverse metabolic derangements, toxicities, the risk of infection and cancer, and a myriad of other side effects. Further, they fail to prevent and control chronic rejection. This review will outline a number of immunosuppressive agents that are currently being explored in experimental and clinical transplantation. These include biologic agents that have more specificity and selectivity, and are aimed at T-cell depletion, blockade of costimulation, adhesion markers, or at novel targets. Most of the studies have been limited to adults but should be applied to the pediatric population as well.