Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of piperacillin/tazobactam when administered by continuous infusion and intermittent dosing

Defining the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index of piperacillin/tazobactam within a hollow-fibre infection model to determine target attainment in intensive care patients

Background

It is important to optimize dosing schemes of antibiotics to maximize the probability of therapeutic success. The recommended pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) index for piperacillin/tazobactam therapy in clinical studies ranges widely (50%-100% fT>1-4×MIC). Dosing schemes failing to achieve PK/PD targets may lead to negative treatment outcomes.

Objectives

The first aim of this study was to define the optimal PK/PD index of piperacillin/tazobactam with a hollow-fibre infection model (HFIM). The second aim was to predict whether these PK/PD targets are currently achieved in critically ill patients through PK/PD model simulation.

Patients and methods

A dose-fractionation study comprising 21 HFIM experiments was performed against a range of Gram-negative bacterial pathogens, doses and infusion times. Clinical data and dose histories from a case series of nine patients with a known bacterial infection treated with piperacillin/tazobactam in the ICU were collected. The PK/PD index and predicted plasma concentrations and therefore target attainment of the patients were simulated using R version 4.2.1.

Results

fT >MIC was found to be the best-fitting PK/PD index for piperacillin/tazobactam. Bactericidal activity with 2 log10 cfu reduction was associated with 77% fT>MIC. Piperacillin/tazobactam therapy was defined as clinically 'ineffective' in ∼78% (7/9) patients. Around seventy-one percent (5/7) of these patients had a probability of >10% that 2  log10 cfu reduction was not attained.

Conclusions

Our dose-fractionation study indicates an optimal PK/PD target in piperacillin/tazobactam therapies should be 77% fT>MIC for 2 log10 kill. Doses to achieve this target should be considered when treating patients in ICU.

Breaking Down the Breakpoints: Rationale for the 2022 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Revised Piperacillin-Tazobactam Breakpoints Against Enterobacterales

Piperacillin-tazobactam (PTZ) is one of the most common antibiotics administered to hospitalized patients. Its broad activity against gram-negative, gram-positive, and anaerobic pathogens; efficacy in clinical trials across diverse infection types and patient populations; and generally favorable toxicity profile make it a particularly appealing antibiotic agent. PTZ susceptibility interpretive criteria (ie, breakpoints) for the Enterobacterales were initially established in 1992, as the drug was undergoing approval by the US Food and Drug Administration. In the ensuing 30 years, changes in the molecular epidemiology of the Enterobacterales and its impact on PTZ susceptibility testing, mounting pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data generated from sophisticated techniques such as population pharmacokinetic modeling and Monte Carlo simulation, and disturbing safety signals in a large clinical trial prompted the Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute (CLSI) to review available evidence to determine the need for revision of the PTZ breakpoints for Enterobacterales. After an extensive literature review and formal voting process, the susceptibility criteria were revised in the 2022 CLSI M100 document to the following: ≤8/4 µg/mL (susceptible), 16/4 µg/mL (susceptible dose-dependent), and ≥32/4 µg/mL (resistant). Herein, we provide a brief overview of the CLSI process of antibiotic breakpoint revisions and elaborate on the available data that ultimately led to the decision to revise the PTZ breakpoints.

Steady-State Piperacillin Concentrations in the Proximity of an Orthopedic Implant: A Microdialysis Porcine Study

Implant-associated osteomyelitis is one of the most feared complications following orthopedic surgery. Although the risk is low, sufficient antibiotic protection of the implant surface is important. The aim of this study was to assess steady-state piperacillin concentrations in the proximity of an orthopedic implant. Time above the minimal inhibitory concentration (fT>MIC) was evaluated for MIC of 8 (low target) and 16 μg/mL (high target). Six female pigs received an intravenous bolus infusion of 4 g/0.5 g piperacillin/tazobactam over 30 min every 6 h. Steady state was assumed achieved in the third dosing interval (12-18 h). Microdialysis catheters were placed in a cannulated screw in the proximal tibial cancellous bone, in cancellous bone next to the screw, and in cancellous bone on the contralateral tibia. Dialysates were collected from time 12 to 18 h and plasma samples were collected as reference. For the low piperacillin target (8 µg/mL), comparable mean fT>MIC across all the investigated compartments (mean range: 54-74%) was found. For the high target (16 µg/mL), fT>MIC was shorter inside the cannulated screw (mean: 16%) than in the cancellous bone next to the screw and plasma (mean range: 49-54%), and similar between the two cancellous bone compartments. To reach more aggressive piperacillin fT>MIC targets in relation to the implant, alternative dosing regimens such as continuous infusion may be considered.

Piperacillin Steady State Concentrations in Target Tissues Relevant for PJI Treatment—A Randomized Porcine Microdialysis Study Comparing Continuous Infusion with Intermittent Short-Term Infusion

(1) Introduction: Piperacillin is a common antibiotic choice in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the time with free piperacillin concentration above the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT > MIC) at steady state in target tissues relevant for PJI treatment following continuous and intermittent short-term infusion. (2) Methods: 16 pigs were randomized to receive either continuous or intermittent short-term infusion of piperacillin. Steady state piperacillin concentrations were assessed using microdialysis in tibial cortical bone, tibial cancellous bone, synovial fluid of the knee joint, and subcutaneous tissue. MIC-targets of 4, 8, 16, and 64 mg/L were applied. Plasma samples were obtained as reference. (3) Results: Continuous infusion resulted in longer fT > MIC for MIC targets of 4 mg/L and 8 mg/L compared to intermittent short-term infusion in all compartments with the exception of tibial cortical bone. For the MIC-target of 16 mg/L, continuous infusion resulted in a longer fT > MIC in all compartments except for the bone compartments. No differences between groups were seen when applying a MIC-target of 64 mg/L. (4) Conclusions: An aggressive dosing strategy may be necessary to obtain sufficient piperacillin concentrations in all bone compartments, particularly if more aggressive targets are applied. Based on the present study, continuous infusion should be considered in the treatment of PJI.

Simple HPLC-UV Method for Piperacillin/Tazobactam Assay in Human Plasma

BACKGROUND

Piperacillin (Pip)/tazobactam (Taz) is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent that has been commonly used in the intensive care unit for severe and life-threatening infections. Recent evidence suggests that therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for Pip could be beneficial in clinical practice to facilitate dose optimization and increase the odds of treatment success. The aim was to develop and validate a sensitive and simple high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method for the simultaneous quantification of Pip and Taz in human plasma.

METHODS

Samples (0.3 mL) were deproteinized with acetonitrile. The supernatant was evaporated and then reconstituted and injected into the HPLC. The chromatographic analysis was carried out by using the C18 column and gradient elution with the acetonitrile:water mobile phase mixture with 0.1% trifluoracetic acid at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min using a UV detector at 218 nm.

RESULTS

The method had acceptable linearity (r² > 0.99) over the concentration ranges of 0.5-400 μg/mL and 1-100 μg/mL for Pip and Taz, respectively. The method demonstrated acceptable inter- and intra-day precision and accuracy within ±20% with adequate stability results.

CONCLUSION

The developed method is sensitive and simple and utilizes simple sample preparation and elution steps, making it suitable and practical for Pip/Taz TDM.

Intermittent Short-Term Infusion vs. Continuous Infusion of Piperacillin: Steady State Concentrations in Porcine Cervical Spine Tissue Evaluated by Microdialysis

Background: Piperacillin is a central drug in the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa spondylodiscitis. Intermittent short-term infusion (STI) remains standard treatment in most centres, although the application of continuous infusion (CI) has shown promising results in other clinical settings. We aimed to evaluate time above the minimal inhibitory concentration (fT > MIC) of the free fraction of piperacillin in steady state conditions in porcine cervical spine tissue following CI and STI using microdialysis with MIC targets of 4, 8, and 16 μg/mL. Methods: 16 female pigs were randomized to receive piperacillin/tazobactam as STI (4/0.5 g every 6 h) or CI (4/0.5 g as a bolus followed by 12/1.5 g) for 18 h. Microdialysis catheters were placed for sampling of piperacillin concentrations from the intervertebral disc, vertebral cancellous bone, paravertebral muscle, and adjacent subcutaneous tissue during the third dosing interval (12−18 h). Blood samples were collected as reference. Results: CI resulted in fT > MIC > 82% across all compartments and targets, except for intervertebral disc (37%) and vertebral cancellous bone (28%) at MIC = 16 μg/mL. In Group STI, >72% fT > MIC was reached for MIC = 4 μg/mL in all investigated compartments, while for MIC = 16 μg/mL only subcutaneous tissue exhibited fT > MIC > 50%. Conclusion: CI of piperacillin resulted in higher fT > MIC compared to STI infusion across the investigated tissues and targets. CI should therefore be considered in spondylodiscitis cases requiring piperacillin treatment.

Setting Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Breakpoints: A Primer for Pediatric Infectious Diseases Specialists on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Approach

Breakpoints are the values used by clinical microbiology laboratories to interpret the results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) and classify isolates as susceptible or resistant. Whether the breakpoints applied by laboratories accurately predict the likelihood of successful treatment with a particular antimicrobial is an issue of critical importance to quality clinical care. In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sets breakpoints, and globally, breakpoints are also set by 2 standards development organizations, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST); individual laboratories may choose which breakpoints to implement. Many CLSI breakpoints are recognized by FDA, facilitating their incorporation into widely used commercial AST devices. The CLSI Subcommittee on AST's consensus approach to establishing (and as needed, revising) breakpoints involves integration of currently available microbiological, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic, and clinical data. Here, an overview of the CLSI process for establishing breakpoints is provided.

Assessment of Piperacillin-Tazobactam-Meropenem Synergy against Serine Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales Using Time-Kill Assays

Synergy between piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem against KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae was recently demonstrated. We sought to test the combination against a broader range of serine carbapenemase producers. We tested the combination against 10 KPC-producing Escherichia coli and 10 OXA-48 family-producing K. pneumoniae isolates. Antibiotic concentrations used are achievable in critically ill patients. The combination was synergistic against 7 of 10 KPC producers and 9 of 10 OXA-48 producers. There was no synergy detected in control isolates producing NDM-1.

In vitro synergy of β-lactam combinations against KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae strains

BACKGROUND

Double carbapenem therapy has been promoted as an alternative treatment for infections due to carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae where carbapenemase inhibitors are unavailable or when other agents have demonstrated toxicity with equally limited evidence. The capacity of other β-lactams and β-lactamase inhibitors to provide synergistic activity with carbapenems is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to investigate the in vitro synergistic potential of other β-lactam/β-lactamase combinations with meropenem against KPC producers.

METHODS

Time-kill assays were performed on 24 unique strains of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Combinations evaluated included meropenem or imipenem with one of the following: ertapenem, piperacillin/tazobactam or ceftolozane/tazobactam. Concentrations used for each drug were those considered physiologically attainable in patients with a time above the concentration exceeding 40%-50% of the dose interval. Combinations were considered to be synergistic when they reduced bacterial cfu/mL by ≥2 log10 at 24 h as compared with the single most active agent.

RESULTS

The combination of piperacillin/tazobactam with meropenem was found to be synergistic against 70.8% of the isolates, followed by ertapenem with meropenem (58.3%) and ceftolozane/tazobactam with meropenem (41.7%). The piperacillin/tazobactam combination was found to be more bactericidal than the other combinations, with 58.3% of isolates demonstrating a ≥4 log10 cfu/mL reduction at 24 h, as compared with 37.5% for ertapenem and 20.8% for ceftolozane/tazobactam combinations.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of piperacillin/tazobactam with meropenem may be a potential therapy against KPC-producing K. pneumoniae when other therapies are unavailable or prohibitively toxic.

Calculated initial parenteral treatment of bacterial infections: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

This is the third chapter of the guideline "Calculated initial parenteral treatment of bacterial infections in adults - update 2018" in the 2nd updated version. The German guideline by the Paul-Ehrlich-Gesellschaft für Chemotherapie e.V. (PEG) has been translated to address an international audience. The chapter features the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics properties of the most frequently used antiinfective agents.

Evaluation of Pharmacodynamic Interactions Between Telavancin and Aztreonam or Piperacillin/Tazobactam Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Introduction

In clinical trials comparing telavancin (TLV) with vancomycin for treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia, TLV demonstrated lower clinical cure rates than vancomycin in patients who had mixed gram-positive and -negative infections and were concomitantly treated with either aztreonam (ATM) or piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ). Here, we investigated therapeutic interactions between TLV and ATM or PTZ in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model under simulated reduced renal function conditions.

Methods

In vitro one-compartment PK/PD models were run over 96 h simulating TLV 10 mg/kg every 48 h, ATM 500 mg every 8 h and PTZ continuous infusion 13.5 g over 24 h alone and in combination against P. aeruginosa, E. coli and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). The efficacy of antimicrobials was evaluated by plotting time-kill curves and calculating the reduction in log₁₀ cfu/ml over 96 h.

Results

Against both MRSA strains, TLV was rapidly bactericidal at 4 h and maintained its activity over 96 h with no observed antagonism by either ATM or PTZ. PTZ maintained bacteriostatic and bactericidal activities against E. coli ATCC 25922 and clinical strain R1022 at 96 h, whereas both strains regrew as soon as 24 h in ATM models. Against P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853, regrowth was noted at 24 h in models simulating ATM and PTZ. The addition of TLV to ATM or PTZ had no appreciable impact on activity against the two E. coli strains and P. aeruginosa strain.

Conclusions

The combinations of TLV and either ATM or PTZ did not demonstrate any antagonistic activity. Clinical variables and patient characteristics should be further explored to determine possible reasons for discrepancies in outcomes.

Funding

Theravance Biopharma Antibiotics, Inc.

Prolonged versus Intermittent Infusion of β-Lactams for the Treatment of Nosocomial Pneumonia: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The primary objective of this meta-analysis is aimed at determining whether β-lactams prolonged infusion in patients with nosocomial pneumonia (NP) results in higher cure rate and improved mortality compared to intermittent infusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Relevant studies were identified from searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL from inception to September 1st, 2015. All published articles which evaluated the outcome of extended/continuous infusion of antimicrobial therapy versus intermittent infusion therapy in the treatment of NP were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of ten studies were included in the analysis involving 1,051 cases of NP. Prolonged infusion of β-lactams was associated with higher clinical cure rate (OR 2.45, 95% CI, 1.12, 5.37) compared to intermittent infusion. However, there was no significant difference in mortality (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.63-1.15) between the two groups. Subgroup analysis for β-lactam subclasses and for severity of illness showed comparable outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The limited data available suggest that reduced clinical failure rates when using prolonged infusions of β-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients with NP. More detailed studies are needed to determine the impact of such strategy on mortality in this patient population.

β-Lactam antibiotics and vancomycin inhibit the growth of planktonic and biofilm Candida spp.: an additional benefit of antibiotic-lock therapy?

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of cefepime, meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) and vancomycin on strains of Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis in planktonic and biofilm forms. Twenty azole-derivative-resistant strains of C. albicans (n=10) and C. tropicalis (n=10) were tested. The susceptibility of planktonic Candida spp. to the antibacterial agents was investigated by broth microdilution. The XTT reduction assay was performed to evaluate the viability of growing and mature biofilms following exposure to these drugs. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ranged from 0.5 mg/mL to 2 mg/mL for cefepime, TZP and vancomycin and from 0.5 mg/mL to 1 mg/mL for meropenem and the drugs also caused statistically significant reductions in biofilm cellular activity both in growing and mature biofilm. Since all of the tested drugs are commonly used in patients with hospital-acquired infections and in those with catheter-related infections under antibiotic-lock therapy, it may be possible to obtain an additional benefit from antibiotic-lock therapy with these drugs, namely the control of Candida biofilm formation.

Modified Augmented Renal Clearance score predicts rapid piperacillin and tazobactam clearance in critically ill surgery and trauma patients

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence suggests that current antimicrobial dosing may be inadequate for some critically ill patients. A major contributor in patients with unimpaired renal function may be Augmented Renal Clearance (ARC), wherein urinary creatinine clearance exceeds that predicted by serum creatinine concentration. We used pharmacokinetic data to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a recently proposed ARC score.

METHODS

Pharmacokinetic data from trauma/surgical intensive care unit patients receiving piperacillin/tazobactam were evaluated. We combined intermediate scores (4-6 points) into a single low score (≤6) group and compared pharmacokinetic parameters against the high (≥7) ARC score group. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using median clearance and volume of distribution, area under the antibiotic time-concentration curve (AUC), and achievement of free concentrations greater than a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 16 μg/mL for at least 50% of the dose interval (fT > MIC ≥ 50%). Alternative dosing strategies were explored in silico.

RESULTS

The ARC score was 100% sensitive and 71.4% specific for detecting increased clearance, increased volume of distribution, decreased AUC, and fT > MIC < 50% at an MIC of 16 μg/mL. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.86 for each, reflecting a high degree of diagnostic accuracy for the ARC score. Serum creatinine less than 0.6 mg/dL had comparable specificity (71.4%) but was less sensitive (66.7%) and accurate (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.69) for detecting higher clearance rates. Monte Carlo pharmacokinetic simulations demonstrated increased time at therapeutic drug levels with extended infusion dosing at a drug cost savings of up to 66.7% over multiple intermittent dosing regimens.

CONCLUSION

Given its ability to predict antimicrobial clearance above population medians, which could compromise therapy, the ARC score should be considered as a means to identify patients at risk for subtherapeutic antibiotic levels. Adequately powered studies should prospectively confirm the utility of the ARC score and the role of antimicrobial therapeutic drug monitoring in such patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic tests, level III.

Continuous versus intermittent infusions of antibiotics for the treatment of severe acute infections

BACKGROUND

Intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics are indicated for the treatment of severe infections. However, the emergence of infections caused by multi-drug resistant organisms in conjunction with a lack of novel antibiotics has prompted the investigation of alternative dosing strategies to improve clinical efficacy and tolerability. To optimise pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic antibiotic parameters, continuous antibiotic infusions have been compared to traditional intermittent antibiotic infusions.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of continuous intravenous administration of concentration-dependent and time-dependent antibiotics to traditional intermittent intravenous administration in adults with severe acute bacterial infections.

SEARCH METHODS

The following electronic databases were searched in September 2012: The Cochrane Injuries Group Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (OvidSP), EMBASE (OvidSP), CINAHL, ISI Web of Science: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), ISI Web of Science: Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (CPCI-S). The reference lists of all relevant material, the Internet and the trials registry www.clinicaltrials.gov for completed and ongoing trials were also searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials in adults with a bacterial infection requiring intravenous antibiotic therapy comparing continuous versus intermittent infusions of antibiotics were included. Both time-dependent and concentration-dependent antibiotics were considered.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three independent authors performed data extraction for the included studies. All data was cross-checked and disagreements resolved by consensus. An intention to treat analysis was conducted using a random-effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies met inclusion criteria with a combined total of over 1,600 patients. The majority of included studies were judged to be at unclear or high risk of bias with regard to randomisation sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, management of incomplete outcome data, selective outcome reporting, and other potential threats to validity. No studies were judged to be at low risk of bias for all methodological quality items assessed. There were no differences in all-cause mortality (n=1241, RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.67 - 1.20, p=0.45), infection recurrence (n=398, RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.35 - 4.19, p=0.76), clinical cure (n=975, RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.93 - 1.08, p=0.98), and superinfection post-therapy (n=813, RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.60 - 1.94, p=0.79). There were no differences in safety outcomes including adverse events (n=575, RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.94 - 1.12, p=0.63), serious adverse events (n=871, RR 1.36, 95% CI 0.80 - 2.30, p=0.26), and withdrawal due to adverse events (n=871, RR 2.03, 95% CI 0.52 - 7.95, p=0.31). A difference was observed in the subgroup analyses of clinical cure in septic versus non-septic patients, where intermittent antibiotic infusions were favoured for clinical cure in septic patients. However, this effect was not consistent between random-effects and fixed-effects analyses. No differences were found in sensitivity analyses conducted.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences in mortality, infection recurrence, clinical cure, superinfection post-therapy, and safety outcomes when comparing continuous infusions of intravenous antibiotics to traditional intermittent infusions of antibiotics. However, the wide confidence intervals suggest that beneficial or harmful effects cannot be ruled out for all outcomes. Therefore, the current evidence is insufficient to recommend the widespread adoption of continuous infusion antibiotics in the place of intermittent infusions of antibiotics. Further large prospective randomised trials, with consistent and complete reporting of clinical outcome measures, conducted with concurrent pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies in special populations are required to determine whether adoption of continuous antibiotic infusions is warranted in specific circumstances.

Steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of piperacillin/tazobactam administered by prolonged infusion in hospitalised patients

The objective of this study was to evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of piperacillin/tazobactam, administered by prolonged infusion, in hospitalised patients requiring antimicrobial therapy. Thirteen patients received 4.5 g every 8 h (q8h), infused over 4 h, and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by non-compartmental methods. Monte Carlo simulations (10,000 patients) were performed to calculate the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) for seven gram-negative pathogens using minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) data from the Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (2004-2007, USA) as well as the probability of target attainment (PTA) at MICs ranging from 1 microg/mL to 64 microg/mL. The pharmacodynamic target was free piperacillin concentration remaining above the MIC for 50% of the dosing interval. Mean+/-standard deviation maximum and minimum serum concentrations, half-life, volume of distribution at steady-state and systemic clearance of piperacillin were 108.2+/-31.7 microg/mL, 27.6+/-26.3 microg/mL, 2.1+/-1.2 h, 22.1+/-4.0 L and 8.6+/-3.0 L/h, respectively. The CFR was > 90% for Escherichia coli, Serratia marcescens and Citrobacter spp., 88.6% for Enterobacter spp., 87% for Klebsiella pneumoniae, 85.5% for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 52.8% for Acinetobacter spp. The PTA was 100%, 81.1% and 12.3% at MICs of < or = 16 microg/mL, 32 microg/mL and 64 microg/mL, respectively. Piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 g q8h infused over 4 h provides excellent target attainment for bacterial pathogens with MICs < or = 16 microg/mL. However, the CFR was < 90% for four of the seven gram-negative pathogens evaluated.

Pharmacokinetic issues for antibiotics in the critically ill patient

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the altered pharmacokinetic properties of selected antibiotics in critically ill patients and to develop basic dose adjustment principles for this patient population.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane-Controlled Trial Register.

STUDY SELECTION

Relevant papers that reported pharmacokinetics of selected antibiotic classes in critically ill patients and antibiotic pharmacodynamic properties were reviewed. Antibiotics and/or antibiotic classes reviewed included aminoglycosides, beta-lactams (including carbapenems), glycopeptides, fluoroquinolones, tigecycline, linezolid, lincosamides, and colistin.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Antibiotics can be broadly categorized according to their solubility characteristics which can, in turn, help describe possible altered pharmacokinetics that can be caused by the pathophysiological changes common to critical illness. Hydrophilic antibiotics (e.g., aminoglycosides, beta-lactams, glycopeptides, and colistin) are mostly affected with the pathphysiological changes observed in critically ill patients with increased volumes of distribution and altered drug clearance (related to changes in creatinine clearance). Lipophilic antibiotics (e.g., fluoroquinolones, macrolides, tigecycline, and lincosamides) have lesser volume of distribution alterations, but may develop altered drug clearances. Using antibiotic pharmacodynamic bacterial kill characteristics, altered dosing regimens can be devised that also account for such pharmacokinetic changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge of antibiotic pharmacodynamic properties and the potential altered antibiotic pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients can allow the intensivist to develop individualized dosing regimens. Specifically, for renally cleared drugs, measured creatinine clearance can be used to drive many dose adjustments. Maximizing clinical outcomes and minimizing antibiotic resistance using individualized doses may be best achieved with therapeutic drug monitoring.

Piperacillin penetration into tissue of critically ill patients with sepsis--bolus versus continuous administration?

OBJECTIVE

To describe a pharmacokinetic model of piperacillin concentrations in plasma and subcutaneous tissue when administered by bolus dosing and continuous infusion in critically ill patients with sepsis on days 1 and 2 of antibiotic therapy and to compare results against previous results for piperacillin from a cohort of patients with septic shock.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Eighteen-bed intensive care unit at 918-bed tertiary referral hospital.

PATIENTS

Thirteen critically ill adult patients with known or suspected sepsis in whom the treating physician deemed piperacillin-tazobactam appropriate therapy were conveniently sampled.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to receive different daily doses of piperacillin-tazobactam by bolus dosing or continuous infusion (continuous infusion--six patients; bolus dosing--seven patients). Serial plasma and tissue concentrations were determined on days 1 and 2 of treatment. Tissue concentrations of piperacillin were determined using a subcutaneously inserted microdialysis catheter. Separate pharmacokinetic models were developed for both bolus and continuous dosing.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

This is the first known article to report concurrent plasma and subcutaneous tissue concentrations of a beta-lactam antibiotic administered by bolus and continuous dosing in critically ill patients with sepsis. With a 25% lower piperacillin dose administered to the continuous infusion group, the infusion group had statistically significantly higher median plasma concentrations than the bolus group on day 2 (16.6 vs. 4.9 mg/L; p = 0.007). There was a trend to higher median plasma concentrations on day 1 in the bolus dosing group (8.9 vs. 4.9 mg/L; p = 0.078). Median tissue concentrations were not statistically different on day 1 (infusion group 2.4 mg/L vs. bolus group 2.2 mg/L; p = 0.48) and day 2 (infusion group 5.2 mg/L vs. bolus group 0.8 mg/L; p = 0.45). A two-compartment pharmacokinetic model was found to describe the data best. Tissue pharmacodynamic targets were achieved more successfully with infusion dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with sepsis do not seem to have the same level of impairment of tissue distribution as described for patients with septic shock. A 25% lower dose of piperacillin administered by continuous infusion seems to maintain higher trough concentrations compared with standard bolus dosing. It is likely that the clinical advantages of continuous infusion are most likely to be evident when treating pathogens with high minimum inhibitory concentration, although without therapeutic drug monitoring and subsequent dose adjustment, infusions may never achieve target concentrations of organisms with very high minimum inhibitory concentrations in a small number of patients.

Clinical cure of ventilator-associated pneumonia treated with piperacillin/tazobactam administered by continuous or intermittent infusion

The standard mode of administration of piperacillin treatment is by intermittent infusion. However, continuous infusion may be advantageous as beta-lactam antibiotics exhibit time-dependent antibacterial activity. In previous studies, we found a higher rate of clinical cure of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) by continuous infusion rather than intermittent infusion of meropenem and ceftazidime. Therefore, the objective of this historical cohort study was to establish the clinical efficacy of piperacillin/tazobactam (PIP/TAZ) administered by continuous and intermittent infusion in the treatment of VAP in patients without renal failure. Logistic regression analysis showed a higher probability of clinical cure of VAP by continuous compared with intermittent infusion when the microorganism responsible for VAP had a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 8 microg/mL [8/9 (88.9%) vs. 6/15 (40.0%); odds ratio (OR)=10.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-588.24; P=0.049] or 16 microg/mL [7/8 (87.5%) vs. 1/6 (16.7%); OR=22.89, 95% CI 1.19-1880.78; P=0.03]. Thus, administration of PIP/TAZ by continuous infusion may be considered more effective than intermittent infusion for the treatment of VAP caused by Gram-negative bacteria when the MIC of the microorganism responsible for VAP is 8-16 microg/mL in patients without renal failure.

High performance liquid chromatographic determination of plasma free and total tazobactam and piperacillin

A high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) method with ultraviolet detection was developed for the measurement of plasma free and total tazobactam and piperacillin. This method is simple and fast, requiring only 11 min for the HPLC run and a sample preparation of about 11 min for total drugs and 10 min for free drugs. The procedure for the assay involves the treatment of plasma with acetonitrile for total drugs determination, and the use of a centrifugal filter device to deproteinize plasma for free drugs determination. The HPLC column, a Hypersil-ODS, was equilibrated with an eluent mixture composed of acetonitrile-potassium phosphate (pH 2.6). CVs for repeatability of tazobactam and piperacillin measurements ranged from 4.30 to 6.60; CVs for reproducibility ranged from 5.60 to 9.40. Mean analytical recoveries ranged from 100.4 to 103%. A linear relationship was obtained between peak area and drugs concentration in the range studied (0-62.5mg/L for tazobactam and 0-500mg/L for piperacillin). The equation for regression line were y=19x-1.4 for tazobactam and y=1.7x-0.9 for piperacillin; correlation coefficients were >0.999. The lower limit of quantitation (LLQ) for standard samples was about 0.12 mg/L for tazobactam and 0.49 mg/L for piperacillin, respectively. The lower limit of detection (LLD) was 0.06 mg/L for tazobactam and 0.24 mg/L for piperacillin. This HPLC assay for tazobactam and piperacillin is sensitive and accurate, and provides a reliable determination of both free and total tazobactam and piperacillin in human plasma, thus allowing the determination of these analytes in patients receiving tazocillin therapy.

Alveolar concentrations of piperacillin/tazobactam administered in continuous infusion to patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia

OBJECTIVES

To determine the steady-state serum and alveolar concentrations of piperacillin/tazobactam administered in continuous infusion to critically ill patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia and various degrees of renal failure.

DESIGN

Prospective comparative study.

SETTING

An intensive care unit and research ward in a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Forty patients with microbiologically documented ventilator-associated pneumonia.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to receive piperacillin/tazobactam daily continuous infusions of 12/1.5 g or 16/2 g after a loading dose of 4/0.5 g. The serum and alveolar piperacillin/tazobactam concentrations were determined at steady-state with high performance liquid chromatography.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The median (interquartile) serum and alveolar piperacillin concentrations were respectively 25.3 mg/L (23.1-32.6) and 12.7 mg/L (6.7-18.0) for 12/1.5 g/day, and 38.9 mg/L (32.9-59.6) and 19.1 mg/L (14.0-21.5), respectively, for 16/2 g/day in patients with no/mild renal failure. In patients with moderate/advance renal failure, the median (interquartile) serum and alveolar piperacillin concentrations were 102.4 mg/L (97.4-112.6) and 44.1 mg/L (33.4-48.3), respectively, for 12/1.5 g/day, and 135.3 mg/L (119.5-146.2) and 54.9 mg/L (45.2-110.3), respectively, for 16/2 g/day. Our results show great variability in piperacillin/tazobactam concentrations, with an alveolar percentage penetration of 40-50% for piperacillin and 65-85% for tazobactam and a negative association between serum or alveolar concentrations and creatinine clearance.

CONCLUSIONS

A target piperacillin serum concentration of at least 35-40 mg/L is probably required to provide alveolar concentrations exceeding the susceptibility breakpoint for gram-negative bacteria (16 mg/L) during ventilator-associated pneumonia. In patients with no/mild renal failure, a continuous daily dose of piperacillin/tazobactam 16/2 g allows reaching this target concentration, which might be not observed with 12/1.5 g/day. In patients with moderate/advanced renal failure, both dosages achieve serum concentrations far above the 35-40 mg/L threshold, suggesting that in that case, therapeutic drug monitoring should be performed in order to adjust the daily dose.

Optimizing therapy with antibacterial agents: use of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic principles in pediatrics

The appropriate dosage of antibacterial agents is essential in achieving both clinical and microbiologic success in the treatment of infections in children. By using in vitro experimental data and animal model outcome data, the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) parameters predictive of antibacterial effect have been elucidated. For time-dependent drugs such as beta-lactams, the PK-PD parameter of interest is the percentage of time in a dosage interval for which drug concentrations remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the infecting organism. For concentration-dependent drugs such as aminoglycosides, the PK-PD parameter of interest is the ratio of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve to the MIC. Recent studies using data on clinical and microbiologic outcomes from infected adults and children, combined with data on drug exposure, have confirmed the importance of these parameters and provided estimates of the PK-PD goals of therapy for various antibacterial agents. Application of these PK-PD principles allows rational dosage regimen selection, both for serious infections in critically ill children and for non-life-threatening community-acquired infections.

Continuous infusion of beta-lactams

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Continuous infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics is becoming increasingly popular. The background and current clinical evidence are discussed. Tools to apply continuous infusion are analyzed.

RECENT FINDINGS

One randomized controlled trial in an ICU setting and two nonrandomized controlled trials have shown continuous infusion to be more beneficial than intermittent infusion. One randomized controlled trial in chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder patients, however, showed no difference between the two treatments. The stability of most beta-lactams for use during continuous infusion has been documented.

SUMMARY

Killing of bacteria by beta-lactam antibiotics is maximal at around four times the minimum inhibitory concentration in vitro. To ensure an optimal effect when treating severe infections, free unbound concentrations at or above four times the minimum inhibitory concentration should be maintained. Although continuous infusion has been demonstrated to be superior in animal studies, randomized clinical trials have failed to confirm this in humans, primarily because of suboptimal design. A better designed randomized clinical trial, set up as a pilot study, recently demonstrated a favorable outcome with continuous infusion. A major issue during continuous infusion is the stability of the antibiotic, which may limit its application. The calculation of the infusion rate necessary to obtain the desired free drug concentration is relatively straightforward.

Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics of Piperacillin and Sulbactam during Intermittent and Continuous Intravenous Infusion

BACKGROUND

The antibacterial effect of piperacillin/sulbactam depends on the time of drug concentration above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC). Therefore, continuous infusion (CI) may be a more rational approach than standard intermittent short-term infusion (SI). The study investigated whether CI achieves effective drug concentrations comparable with SI.

METHODS

Seven intensive care unit patients received either piperacillin/sulbactam as 4/1 g intravenous infusion over 15-20 min every 8 h or as 4/1 g intravenous loading dose (15-20 min) followed by 8/2 g intravenous CI per 24 h. After 2 days, regimes were crossed over.

RESULTS

Pharmacokinetic parameters (mean +/- SD) for SI piperacillin/sulbactam were: (1) peak serum concentration: piperacillin 231 +/- 66 mg/l, sulbactam 53.1 +/- 15.0 mg/l; (2) minimum serum concentration: piperacillin 11.5 +/- 14.8 mg/l, sulbactam 4.2 +/- 3.5 mg/l; (3) clearance: piperacillin 197 +/- 72 ml/min (CI 269 +/- 123 ml/min), sulbactam 167 +/- 61 ml/min (CI 212 +/- 109 ml/min); (4) half-life: piperacillin 2.4 +/- 1.2 h, sulbactam 3.1 +/- 1.6 h. Steady-state concentrations during CI were 25.5 +/- 14.5 mg/l for piperacillin and 8.0 +/- 3.7 mg/l for sulbactam. Average serum concentrations were comparable in both regimens.

CONCLUSION

A large German survey demonstrated that approximately 89% of Pseudomonas aerugionsa have an MIC < or =16 mg/l and approximately 82% have an MIC < or =8 mg/l. According to this threshold, appropriate anti-bacterial concentrations of piperacillin/sulbactam were achievable with CI. CI dosing has the additional advantage that less drug is necessary. Further prospective studies are warranted to compare the clinical efficacy of CI and SI regimens in bacterial infections.

Piperacillin-tazobactam: a beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination

Piperacillin-tazobactam is a beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination with a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity that includes Gram-positive and -negative aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Piperacillin-tazobactam retains its in vitro activity against broad-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing and some extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, but not against isolates of Gram-negative bacilli harboring AmpC beta-lactamases. Piperacillin-tazobactam has recently been reformulated to include ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and sodium citrate; this new formulation has been shown to be compatible in vitro with the two aminoglycosides, gentamicin and amikacin, allowing for simultaneous Y-site infusion, but not with tobramycin. Multicenter, randomized, double-blinded clinical trials have demonstrated piperacillin-tazobactam to be as clinically effective as relevant comparator antibiotics. Clinical trials have demonstrated piperacillin-tazobactam to be effective for the treatment of patients with intra-abdominal infections, skin and soft tissue infections, lower respiratory tract infections, complicated urinary tract infections, gynecological infections and more recently, febrile neutropenia. Piperacillin-tazobactam has an excellent safety and tolerability profile and continues to be a reliable option for the empiric treatment of moderate-to-severe infections in hospitalized patients.

Algunas reflexiones acerca de la administración de antibióticos betalactámicos en infusión continua

Numerous studies on continuous intravenous infusion of betalactam antibiotics have indicated that this could be a useful strategy for treating nosocomial infections as well as exacerbations of pulmonary infections in patients with cystic fibrosis and episodes of febrile neutropenia. From the pharmacodynamic viewpoint, betalactam antibiotics have a time-dependent behavior. Thus, the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index that best correlates with therapeutic efficacy appears to be the time during which free antibiotic concentrations remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the infecting microorganism. Continuous infusion of betalactams successfully optimizes this pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic index. Furthermore, some studies have shown that this therapeutic strategy may be favorable economically.

Randomized, open-label, comparative study of piperacillin-tazobactam administered by continuous infusion versus intermittent infusion for treatment of hospitalized patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection

The purpose of this randomized, multicenter, open-label study was to compare the continuous infusion of piperacillin-tazobactam with the standard intermittent infusion in 262 hospitalized patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections. Within 1 day of surgical intervention, eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to piperacillin-tazobactam 12 g/1.5 g administered continuously over 24 h or 3 g/0.375 g administered over 30 min intermittently every 6 h for 4 to 14 days. The demographics of the patients in the groups were similar, with a median APACHE II score of 7 and a median length of hospitalization of 7 days. Among 167 clinically evaluable patients, 86.4% and 88.4% of the patients treated with the continuous infusion and the intermittent infusion, respectively, were clinically cured or improved at the test-of-cure visit (P = 0.817). Bacteriological success was observed in 83.9% and 87.9% of patients (P = 0.597) in the two groups, respectively, and no differences in bacteriological response by pathogen were noted. Defervesence and white blood cell count normalization occurred in the majority of patients within 3 days and were similar between patients receiving the continuous infusion and those receiving the intermittent infusion. Drug-related adverse events were generally mild and were reported in similar numbers of patients in each arm of the trial. The results of this study support continuous infusion as a safe and reasonable alternate mode of administration of piperacillin-tazobactam for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infection.

Continuous versus intermittent intravenous administration of antibacterials with time-dependent action: a systematic review of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters

We performed a systematic review of randomised clinical trials to evaluate the comparative pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the continuous versus intermittent mode of intravenous administration of various antibacterials. Data were identified from PubMed (January 1950 to January 2005), Current Contents, the Cochrane central register of controlled trials, and references from relevant articles and reviews. Seventeen randomised clinical trials comparing continuous with intermittent intravenous administration of the same antibacterial regimen and examining the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties were included in this systematic review. We reviewed data regarding the clinical setting, number of participants, antibacterial agents and dosages used, as well as maximum serum concentration (Cmax), trough serum concentration (Cmin), steady-state or plateau serum concentration (Css), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) [T>MIC], AUC: MIC, elimination rate constant, elimination half-life, volume of distribution and systematic clearance. The mean Cmax of the intermittently administered antibacterials was higher compared with Css achieved by the continuous infusion of the same antibacterial in all eligible studies (Cmax was on average 5.5 times higher than Css, range 1.9-11.2). Css was on average 5.8 times higher than the Cmin of the intermittently administered antibacterials (range 1.2-15.6). In three of six studies the length of time that the drug concentration was above the MIC of the responsible pathogens was longer in patients receiving the antibacterials continuously. In conclusion, the reviewed data suggest that the continuous intravenous infusion of antibacterials with time-dependent bacterial killing seems to be superior than the intermittent intravenous administration, from a pharmacodynamic point of view, at least when treating bacteria with high MIC values for the studied antibacterials.

Continuous infusion beta-lactams for intensive care unit pulmonary infections

This study evaluated the pharmacodynamics of continuous infusion beta-lactams against pulmonary isolates of Gram-negative bacteria from patients managed in intensive care units (ICUs) in the USA. Multiple 10,000-patient Monte Carlo simulations were performed by integrating pharmacokinetic data from healthy individuals with 2408 MICs from the 2002 Intensive Care Unit Surveillance System database. These pharmacodynamic simulations suggested that continuous infusion regimens of cefepime, aztreonam, ceftazidime and piperacillin-tazobactam 13.5 g have the greatest likelihood of achieving pharmacodynamic targets against isolates of Enterobacteriaceae in the ICU. Beta-lactams are unlikely to achieve pharmacodynamic targets against Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Acinetobacter baumannii when administered as monotherapy.

Continuous infusion of ticarcillin-clavulanate for home treatment of serious infections: clinical efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

Continuous infusion (CI) ticarcillin-clavulanate is a potential therapeutic improvement over conventional intermittent dosing because the major pharmacodynamic (PD) predictor of efficacy of beta-lactams is the time that free drug levels exceed the MIC. This study incorporated a 6-year retrospective arm evaluating efficacy and safety of CI ticarcillin-clavulanate in the home treatment of serious infections and a prospective arm additionally evaluating pharmacokinetics (PK) and PD. In the prospective arm, steady-state serum ticarcillin and clavulanate levels and MIC testing of significant pathogens were performed. One hundred and twelve patients (median age, 56 years) were treated with a CI dose of 9.3-12.4g/day and mean CI duration of 18.0 days. Infections treated included osteomyelitis (50 patients), septic arthritis (6), cellulitis (17), pulmonary infections (12), febrile neutropenia (7), vascular infections (7), intra-abdominal infections (2), and Gram-negative endocarditis (2); 91/112 (81%) of patients were cured, 14 (13%) had partial response and 7 (6%) failed therapy. Nine patients had PICC line complications and five patients had drug adverse events. Eighteen patients had prospective PK/PD assessment although only four patients had sufficient data for a full PK/PD evaluation (both serum steady-state drug levels and ticarcillin and clavulanate MICs from a bacteriological isolate), as this was difficult to obtain in home-based patients, particularly as serum clavulanate levels were found to deteriorate rapidly on storage. Three of four patients with matched PK/PD assessment had free drug levels exceeding the MIC of the pathogen. Home CI of ticarcillin-clavulanate is a safe, effective, convenient and practical therapy and is a therapeutic advance over traditional intermittent dosing when used in the home setting.

Continuous versus intermittent intravenous administration of antibiotics: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Intermittent intravenous administration of antibiotics is the first-line approach in the management of severe infections worldwide. However, the potential benefits of alternate modes of administration of antibiotics, including continuous intravenous infusion, deserve further evaluation. We did a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing continuous intravenous infusion with intermittent intravenous administration of the same antibiotic regimen. Nine randomised controlled trials studying beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, and vancomycin were included. Clinical failure was lower, although without statistical significance, in patients receiving continuous infusion of antibiotics (pooled OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.53-1.01); the difference was statistically significant in a subset of randomised controlled trials that used the same total daily antibiotic dose for both intervention arms (0.70, 0.50-0.98, fixed and random effects models). Regarding mortality and nephrotoxicity, no differences were found (mortality 0.89, 0.48-1.64; nephrotoxicity 0.91, 0.56-1.47). In conclusion, the data suggest that the administration of the same total antibiotic dose by continuous intravenous infusion may be more efficient, with regard to clinical effectiveness, compared with the intermittent mode. In an era of gradually increasing resistance among most pathogens, the potential advantages of continuous intravenous administration of antibiotics on several clinical outcomes should be further investigated.

Pharmacodynamics of intermittent and continuous infusion piperacillin/tazobactam and cefepime against extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing organisms

The pharmacodynamics of piperacillin/tazobactam and cefepime were evaluated against extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing organisms. Ten thousand patients were simulated based on ESBL minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) from our laboratory (N=39) and on pharmacokinetic data from peer-reviewed literature. The desired proportion of the dosing interval that the concentration remains above the MIC (%T>MIC) for the intermittent bolus regimens was >/=40% for piperacillin/tazobactam and >/=60% for cefepime. The desired C(ss)/MIC ratio (where C(ss) is the concentration at steady state) was >/=2 for all continuous infusion (CI) regimens. MIC(50), MIC(90) and %S were, respectively, 64/4mug/mL, 1024/4mug/mL and 33% for piperacillin/tazobactam and 8mug/mL, 16mug/mL and 0% for cefepime. For piperacillin/tazobactam, 3.375g every 4h (q4h) achieved the highest probability of target attainment (43%), followed by 13.5g CI (31%), 3.375g q6h (27%), 4.5g q8h (17%) and 6.75g CI (10%). However, for cefepime, 4g CI had the highest probability of target attainment (77%), followed by 1g q8h (65%), 2g q12h (58%), 3g CI (46%) and 1g q12h (27%). Although the probabilities of target attainment for cefepime were higher than for piperacillin/tazobactam, neither agent achieved a high probability of target attainment and should not be used routinely for the treatment of ESBL infections.

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of piperacillin/tazobactam in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of piperacillin and tazobactam in hospitalized patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A multicentre, randomized clinical trial was conducted in hospitalized patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection. Patients received piperacillin/tazobactam administered by either continuous infusion (13.5 g over 24 h, n = 130) or intermittent infusion (3.375 g every 6 h, n = 132). NONMEM was used to perform population pharmacokinetic analysis in a subset of patients (n = 56) who had serum samples obtained at steady-state for drug concentration analyses. Classification and regression tree analysis was used to identify the breakpoints of piperacillin PK-PD indexes in 94 patients with causative pathogen's MIC.

RESULTS

A one-compartment model was applied to fit the data. Creatinine clearance and body weight were the most significant variables to explain patient variability in piperacillin and tazobactam clearance and volume of distribution. The infusion method had no influence on PK parameters. For patients (n = 30) receiving intermittent infusion in the pharmacokinetic study, mean Cmax and half-life were 122.22 mg/L and 1.17 h for piperacillin, and 15.74 mg/L and 1.81 h for tazobactam. For patients (n = 26) receiving continuous infusion in the pharmacokinetic study, mean steady-state concentration was 35.31 +/- 12.15 mg/L for piperacillin and 7.29 +/- 3.28 mg/L for tazobactam. As a result of a low rate of failures (<11%) observed in the trial and the low MICs for infecting pathogens, no association could be established between clinical/microbiological outcome and drug exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Intermittent infusion and continuous infusion of piperacillin and tazobactam provided sufficient drug exposure to treat those pathogens commonly implicated in intra-abdominal infections.

Pharmacodynamic profiling of piperacillin in the presence of tazobactam in patients through the use of population pharmacokinetic models and Monte Carlo simulation

The primary objectives of this analysis were to determine which pharmacokinetic model most accurately describes the elimination pathways for piperacillin in the presence of tazobactam through population pharmacokinetic modeling and to characterize its pharmacodynamic profile. Once the optimal pharmacokinetic model was identified, Monte Carlo simulation of 10,000 subjects with ADAPT II was performed to estimate the probability of attaining a target free-piperacillin concentration greater than the MIC for 50% of the dosing interval for 3.375 g every 6 h or every 4 h given as a 0.5-h infusion at each MIC between 0.25 and 32 microg/ml. In the population pharmacokinetic analysis, measurements of bias and precision, observed-predicted plots, and r2 values were highly acceptable for all three models and all three models were appropriate candidates for the Monte Carlo simulation evaluation. Visual comparison of the distribution of the piperacillin concentrations at the pharmacodynamic endpoint--h 3 concentrations of a 6-h dosing interval--between the simulated populations and raw data revealed that the linear model was most reflective of the raw data at the pharmacodynamic endpoint, and the linear model was therefore selected for the target attainment analysis. In the target attainment analysis, administration of 3 g of piperacillin every 6 h resulted in a robust target attainment rate that exceeded 95% for MICs of < or =8 mg/liter. The 4-h piperacillin administration interval had a superior pharmacodynamic profile and provided target attainment rates exceeding 95% for MICs of < or =16 mg/liter. This study indicates that piperacillin-tazobactam should have utility for empirical therapy of hospital-onset infections.

In vitro killing of parenteral beta-lactams against standard and high inocula of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase and non-ESBL producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

Minimum inhibitory concentrations and time-kill curves were performed against 8 Klebsiella pneumoniae (4 non-extended-spectrum beta-lactamase[ESBL] and 4 ESBL) for piperacillin/tazobactam (40/5 microg/mL), cefepime (20 microg/mL), and meropenem (4 microg/mL) by using a standard and high inocula. Imipenem was evaluated only at the standard inoculum for the non-ESBL and ESBL isolates. Samples were withdrawn at 7 predetermined time-points over 24 hours and plated on trypticase soy agar plates. Minimum inhibitory concentrations were: piperacillin/tazobactam 4 to 8 microg/mL (ESBL and non-ESBL), cefepime 1 to 2 microg/mL (ESBL) and 0.06 to 0.125 microg/mL (non-ESBL), imipenem 0.125 to 0.25 microg/mL (ESBL and non-ESBL), and meropenem 0.03 to 0.06 microg/mL (ESBL and non-ESBL). Each antibiotic reached and maintained bactericidal killing (> or =3 log killing) for 24 hours against all non-ESBL isolates for both the standard and high inoculum. Cefepime, imipenem, and meropenem showed the same bactericidal activity against each ESBL isolate at the standard inoculum, whereas piperacillin/tazobactam showed bactericidal killing against only 1 ESBL isolate. At the high inoculum, cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam were unable to maintain bactericidal activity against any of the ESBL isolates. Only meropenem was able to maintain bactericidal killing over 24 hours against the ESBL isolates at the high inoculum. In summary, meropenem and imipenem maintained bactericidal activity against non-ESBL and ESBL K. pneumoniae irrespective of the inoculum size. While piperacillin/tazobactam and cefepime are bactericidal against non-ESBL K. pneumoniae, their activity against ESBL K. pneumoniae is limited and based on the size of the inoculum. Until more data are available, piperacillin/tazobactam and cefepime should not be used for the treatment of ESBL K. pneumoniae.

In vitro activity of parenteral Beta-lactams, levofloxacin and tobramycin alone or in combination against extended-spectrum Beta-lactamase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

MICs and time-kill studies were performed for four clinical isolates of extended-spectrum Beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. MICs (mg/L) were: piperacillin/tazobactam 8, cefepime 1-2, meropenem 0.03-0.06, levofloxacin 0.5-8 and tobramycin 0.25-32. For monotherapy, only meropenem maintained bactericidal activity over the 24 h for all isolates. Levofloxacin and tobramycin maintained bactericidal activity against the isolate susceptible to each drug. Piperacillin/tazobactam and cefepime did not maintain bactericidal activity against any isolate. Combination therapy with piperacillin/tazobactam or cefepime combined with levofloxacin or tobramycin were able to provide dramatic killing against ESBL K. pneumoniae, but did not always maintain bactericidal activity. Future studies should evaluate different antimicrobial combinations against pathogens producing specific ESBL enzymes to define their utility as an alternative to carbapenems.

Steady-state plasma and intrapulmonary concentrations of piperacillin/tazobactam 4 g/0.5 g administered to critically ill patients with severe nosocomial pneumonia

OBJECTIVE

To determine the steady-state plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) concentrations of piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T) administered to critically ill patients with severe bacterial pneumonia.

DESIGN

Prospective, open-label study.

SETTING

An intensive care unit and research ward in a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Ten adult patients with severe nosocomial bacterial pneumonia on mechanical ventilation.

INTERVENTIONS

All subjects received a 30-min intravenous infusion of P/T 4 g/0.5 g every 8 h. The steady-state plasma and ELF concentrations of P/T were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The mean+/-SD steady-state plasma trough, peak, and intermediate concentrations were 8.5+/-4.6 microg/ml, 55.9+/-21.6 microg/ml, and 24.0+/-13.8 microg/ml for piperacillin, and 2.1+/-1.0 microg/ml, 4.8+/-2.1 microg/ml, and 2.4+/-1.2 microg/ml for tazobactam, respectively. The mean+/-SD steady-state intermediate ELF concentrations were 13.6+/-9.4 microg/ml for piperacillin and 2.1+/-1.1 microg/ml for tazobactam, respectively, showing a mean percentage penetration of piperacillin and tazobactam into ELF of 56.8% and 91.3 %, respectively, with a P/T ratio of 6.5:1.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that during the treatment of severe nosocomial pneumonia, a regimen of P/T 4 g/0.5 g every 8 h might provide insufficient concentrations into lung tissue to exceed the MIC of many causative pathogens. This suggests that higher doses of P/T should be administered in order to maximize the antibiotic concentration at the site of infection, or that a second antimicrobial agent should be used in association.

In vitro evaluation of the activity of two doses of Levofloxacin alone and in combination with other agents against Pseudomonas aeruginosa

P. aeruginosa is one of the most difficult to treat pathogens that generally requires combination therapy to prevent the development of resistance. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of two concentrations of levofloxacin (modeled for the 500 mg and 750 mg daily dose) in combination with ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem, and tobramycin against P. aeruginosa. MICs and time-kill studies were performed against 12 non-duplicate clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa. The percent susceptible for levofloxacin, ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, imipenem, and tobramycin were 67%, 58%, 58%, 67%, 75%, and 100%, respectively. Tobramycin was the most active single agent, killing and maintaining > or =99.9% killing over a 24 h period against all isolates. Levofloxacin 4 microg/mL(750 mg/day) alone reached 99.9% killing and maintain this killing over the time period more often than levofloxacin 2 microg/mL (500 mg/day). No combination was antagonistic and all combinations with tobramycin were indifferent. Overall, levofloxacin 2 microg/mL plus a beta-lactam was synergistic (65%) more often than levofloxacin 4 microg/mL combinations (46%). This was not unexpected due to the increased activity of levofloxacin 4 microg/mL. However, levofloxacin 4 microg/mL combinations maintained a > or =99.9% killing over the entire 24 h period more often than levofloxacin 2 microg/mL combinations (94% vs 83%). The findings from this work suggest that levofloxacin 750 mg/day in combination with another agent active against P. aeruginosa may prove to be clinically beneficial and superior to combinations using lower doses of levofloxacin. In vivo studies are needed to evaluate the clinical significance of these findings.