Intra-articular detachment of the Endobutton more than 18 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Intra-articular migration of tibial suture button in pediatric full epiphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A case report

We report a case of a 12-years-old boy that underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and lateral meniscus repair. The all-epiphyseal, all-inside technique, with quadriceps tendon autograft and adjustable suspensory button fixation was utilized due to the open physes. Intraoperative fluoroscopy confirmed optimal position of the buttons, while arthroscopic evaluation of the graft showed proper tension, with full range of motion and knee stability. Nevertheless, routine radiographic evaluation of the knee, 6 ​h postoperatively, revealed tibial button migration through the tunnel into the knee joint, while the knee was unstable in clinical examination. The graft was removed and reloaded with extended buttons. The femoral socket was retained in the revision surgery while a new tibial socket was drilled with the transphyseal technique (all-inside technique). The postoperative course was uneventful. The patient returned to unrestricted activities at twelve months after revision surgery and remains fully active two years postoperatively. This is the first case of tibial button migration reported in the literature, with immediate migration after surgery, intra-articular position of the button and negative impact on graft tension. Failure to recognize and treat this detrimental complication could be catastrophic for the knee. The technique of the surgical treatment is also described. Surgeons should be aware of this rare complication, that could adversely affect the clinical outcome.

Deep Infection After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Diagnosed by Intratunnel Suspensory Fixation Device Migration: A Case Report

CASE

A 43-year-old woman sustained an anterior cruciate ligament injury while kickboxing and underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft with suspensory fixation. Lateral thigh wound was superficially infected at 2 weeks postoperatively with resolution of signs and symptoms after debridement. Three months later, posterolateral knee pain developed and radiographs revealed intratunnel migration of the device. That observation with abnormal magnetic resonance imaging and serology results led to the diagnosis of deep infection. Immediate device removal and debridement were performed. Consequently, the grafts were preserved, and the patient could perform kickboxing 2 years thereafter.

CONCLUSIONS

Intratunnel migration of suspensory fixation devices can support a diagnosis of infection.

Arthroscopic confirmation of femoral button deployment prevents soft tissue interposition in ACL reconstruction

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether direct arthroscopic control of femoral buttons can prevent improper deployment and soft tissue interposition in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the SANTI study group database was performed. All patients who underwent ACL reconstruction using suspensive femoral fixation between 01/01/2017 and 31/12/2019 were included. Patient assessment included demographics, sports metrics, reoperations performed and femoral button-related specific complications such as iliotibial band (ITB) irritation and/or septic arthritis. Proper deployment of the button and soft tissue interposition were assessed on postoperative radiographs.

RESULTS

A total of 307 patients underwent ACL reconstruction using adjustable femoral button fixation and were analyzed after a mean follow-up of 35.2 ± 11.0 months (14.3-50.2). The mean age was 39.5 ± 10.9-years old (range 13.3-70.6). Postoperative radiographs showed a correctly deployed femoral button without soft tissue interposition for all patients. No septic arthritis was reported. Nine patients (2.9%) suffered from lateral pain related to ITB irritation due to the button. Five of them had their symptoms resolve during rehabilitation. Ultrasound-guided corticosteroid infiltration was necessary for four patients after an average delay of 14.5 ± 4.8 months (11.7-21.7). Three patients were then symptom-free, but one required surgical removal of the implant 27.5 months after the surgery. Regarding unrelated femoral button complications, 15 patients (4.9%) underwent secondary arthroscopic procedures, including meniscectomy (1.6%), surgery for cyclops syndrome (2.6%) and revision ACLR (0.7%).

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic confirmation of femoral button deployment prevents soft tissue interposition without specific complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Complications following Suture Button Use for Femoral Graft Fixation in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Understanding any potential complications that may occur in relation to the use of a suture button for femoral graft fixation in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction can help raise awareness among surgeons and improve safety when using such implants. This is a systematic review of suture button related complications. A literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases from their year of inception until January 3, 2019. We included studies reporting on suture button related complications in their outcomes of femoral graft suture button fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Our search identified 479 articles, of which 19 met our inclusion criteria. Suture button misplacement (initial or subsequent migration) was the most commonly reported complication. Although, in most cases, button misplacement is minimal and does not adversely affect clinical outcomes, in some cases it may lead to graft failure or local soft tissue irritation and require further surgery. Intraoperative screening or arthroscopic evaluation of the deployed suture button may reduce this complication.

Arthroscopic confirmation of femoral button deployment avoids post-operative X-ray in ACL reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with cortical fixation adjustable-loop devices are associated with high potential risk of button malpositioning or interposition of the soft tissue between lateral femoral cortex and the button. Surgeons usually use X-rays to check and avoid button malposition and soft tissue interposition. Arthroscopic visualization of button position through the lateral gutter has been described. With this technique, it is possible for identification and correction of femoral button malalignment in the setting of soft tissue interposition and it could avoid the use of post-operative X-ray.

METHODS

A total of 193 ACLR were included and patients were randomized into two groups. The first series (Group A) of 112 patients who sustained an ACLR with post-operative X-ray to assess the position of the femoral button and the second series (Group B) of 81 patients who sustained an ACLR with an arthroscopic exploration of the button followed by post-operative X-ray.

RESULTS

On the post-operative radiographs, tissue interposition between the button and femoral cortex was found in nine cases of 112 in Group A (8%) and in zero case of 81 in Group B (0%). In six cases (7,4%) in Group B, there was a soft tissue interposition between the button and femoral cortex as visualized by arthroscopic confirmation and before post-operative X-ray; in all these cases, the soft tissue was removed, and the button was in contact with the bone in all X-ray made in the Group B.

CONCLUSIONS

This technique allows for identification and correction of femoral button malalignment in the setting of soft tissue interposition and reduces the use of post-operative X-ray.

Confirming Proper Button Deployment of Suspensory Fixation During ACL Reconstruction

Background

Suspensory fixation of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) grafts has emerged as a popular device for femoral graft fixation. However, improper deployment of the suspensory fixation can compromise proper graft tensioning, leading to failure and revision. Also, soft tissue interposition between the button and bone has been associated with graft migration and pain, occasionally requiring revision surgery. Many surgeons rely on manual testing and application of distal tension to the graft to confirm proper button deployment on the lateral cortex of the femur for ACL graft fixation.

Purpose

To determine the reliability of the manual resistance maneuver when applying distal tension to deploy the suspensory device along the lateral cortex of the femur.

Study Design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

All patients undergoing ACLR with a suture button suspensory device for femoral fixation were eligible for enrollment in the study. The surgeries were performed by 3 board-certified, sports medicine fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons at a single outpatient surgical center between May 2018 and June 2019. All grafts were passed in a retrograde manner into the femoral tunnel, and a vigorous manual tensioning maneuver in a distal direction was placed on the graft to deploy and secure along the lateral cortex of the femur. Intraoperative mini c-arm fluoroscopy was obtained to demonstrate proper suture button positioning. If interposing tissue or an improperly flipped button was identified, rectifying steps were undertaken and recorded.

Results

A total of 51 patients with a mean age of 33.3 years were included in the study. Of these patients, 74.5% had normal suture button positioning identified via intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging, while 15.7% had interposed soft tissue and 9.8% had an improperly flipped button. In all cases, the surgeon was able to rectify the malpositioning intraoperatively.

Conclusion

Despite the manual sensation of proper suspensory button positioning, intraoperative fluoroscopy identified suture button deployment errors in ACLR 25% of the time. Correcting the malpositioning is not technically demanding. These findings advocate for routine intraoperative surveillance to confirm appropriate suture button seating during ACLR.

The effect of soft tissue interposition of the Endobutton on clinical results and on its postoperative migration after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the possible consequences of soft tissue interposition of Endobutton on clinical outcomes and reoperation rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

METHODS

We measured the distance between the centre of the Endobutton and the lateral femoral cortex on the postoperative first day anteroposterior X-rays of the 156 knees that underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Those with a distance less than 1 mm were regarded as Group 1 (118 patients), the ones between 1 mm and 2 mm were regarded as Group 2 (30 patients) and the ones more than 2 mm were regarded as Group 3 (8 patients). The movement of the Endobutton of more than 1 mm along the femoral tunnel axis on anteroposterior X-rays or its rotation by more than 5° on lateral X-rays during follow-up were considered migration. Clinical assessment scores (Lysholm, Tegner Activity Scale), clinical examination tests, and rates of Endobutton migration in the groups were analysed.

RESULTS

Eleven Endobuttons (9.3%) in Group 1, 26 Endobuttons (86.7%) in Group 2 and all of the 8 Endobuttons (100%) in Group 3 were observed to have migrated. Clinical results and examination tests showed no significant difference between Groups 1 and 2, whereas a significant difference was detected in Group 3 compared to Groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Soft tissue interposition is a major cause of Endobutton migration, and an interposition over 2 mm between the Endobutton and the lateral femoral cortex can negatively affect the outcomes after an anterior cruciate ligament surgery.

The interposition of soft tissue between the cortical button and femoral lateral cortex significantly increases button migration but does not negatively affect knee stability and clinical outcome

BACKGROUND

In clinical practice, soft tissue interposition may occur during femoral graft fixation. Soft tissue interposition between the lateral femoral cortex and the cortical button may affect graft tension and related longitudinal graft motion in the tunnel. We aimed to investigate the effect of soft tissue interposition on button migration and clinical outcomes in anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

METHODS

Eighty-four patients aged 18-40 years, who underwent anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadruple hamstring autograft were included. Patients were divided into two groups as Group 1 (n = 32) with soft tissue interposition between the cortical button and cortex, and Group 2 (n = 52) without soft tissue interposition. At the one-year follow-up visit, the anteroposterior knee stability of the patients was evaluated using the Lachman test and KT-2000 arthrometer, and rotational stability was assessed with the pivot shift test. The Lysholm knee score was used to evaluate the functional outcome of the patients. Relationship between tissue interposition and clinical outcome, and button migration was examined.

RESULTS

Button migration was observed in 12 patients in Group 1 (37.5%) and two patients (3.84%) in Group 2 (p < 0.001). However, no significant difference was observed between patients with and without tissue interposition or those with and without button migration regarding knee stability parameters and clinical outcome (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative tissue interposition is found to be associated with cortical button migration during the follow-up. However, it does not affect the clinical outcome.

Late Migration of an Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspension Device in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

A unique case of late migration of an adjustable-loop femoral fixation button utilized during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is presented. Imaging and physical examinations during the patient's postoperative course were unremarkable for graft or hardware failure. Two years postoperatively, symptomatic hardware migration occurred requiring arthroscopic removal. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of late migration of an adjustable-loop femoral fixation button in ACL reconstruction. This case highlights that late loosening and migration of adjustable-loop femoral fixation devices in ACL reconstruction can occur despite demonstrated postoperative radiographic and clinical stability. Surgeons utilizing this fixation device should be aware of this potential complication to avoid delayed recognition and patient morbidity.

Uncommon Complications after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) is a common surgical procedure, with good outcome in 75 to 97% of the cases. However, different complications have been described including infection, hemarthrosis, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary embolism (PE) with a rate ranging from 1 to 15%. There are few case reports in the literature describing rare complications after ACL-R and they can be divided into: (1) complications related to the fixation device (rupture, migration); (2) fractures (tibial or femoral side); (3) infections due to uncommon bacteria, mycobacterium, and mycosis; (4) rare vascular injuries; (5) nerve injuries; and (6) other rare complications. In case of fixation device rupture or migration, device removal can be easy but the diagnosis may be challenging. Patellar fracture after ACL-R may be related to harvesting and it is not uncommon. Conversely, femoral or tibial fractures are most frequently due to bone weakness related to bone tunnels. Some rare infections related to uncommon bacteria or mycosis are also described with potentially devastating joint damage. Popliteal artery injuries are uncommon in ACL-R but minor vessels damages are described with possible severe consequences for patients. Injuries to the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve are not uncommon in ACL-R. However, there are few case reports also describing injuries to the saphenous nerve, the common peroneal nerve and the sciatic nerve. The aim of this paper is to review the literature describing uncommon complications after ACL-R, giving some more information about diagnosis and treatment.

Clinical Outcomes of Single Anteromedial Bundle Biologic Augmentation Technique for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Consideration of Tibial Remnant Size

PURPOSE

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the functional outcomes, knee stability, complications, and reoperations associated with anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using the single anteromedial bundle biological augmentation (SAMBBA) technique in a consecutive series of 128 patients with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. A secondary aim was to compare larger preserved ACL remnants with smaller preserved remnants.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary anatomic ACL reconstruction using the SAMBBA technique from July 2013 to October 2014 were analyzed. Exclusion criteria were (1) age <16 years, (2) revision cases, (3) multiple ligament injuries, (4) chondral lesions greater than grade 2 according to the Outerbridge classification, (5) additional injuries to the collateral ligaments greater than grade 2, or (6) a history of a contralateral ACL injury. Clinical assessment including evaluation of side-to-side difference and functional outcome measures with the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score and the Tegner Activity Scale were used to evaluate outcomes before surgery and at the last follow-up. Any subsequent surgical procedures were systematically recorded during the study period. The patients were also divided in 2 groups according to their ACL remnant size, ≥50% or <50%, and compared.

RESULTS

Of the 135 patients who underwent primary SAMBBA technique, 128 patients returned to final follow-up, with a mean follow-up of 31.7 months (range, 24-44.3). At last follow-up, the IKDC score significantly improved from 54.1 ± 15.1 to 92.5 ± 11.4 (P < .001); the Tegner activity score (6.4 ± 1.2) was similar (P = .3) to the preinjury score (6.5 ± 1.2). Side-to-side laxity significantly improved from 6.7 ± 1.2 mm to 0.7 ± 1 mm (P < .001). Twenty-four subsequent surgeries (18.7%) were performed including 10 meniscal procedures, 7 ACL revisions, 5 arthroscopies for cyclops lesions, one microfracture, and one manipulation under anaesthesia. The side-to-side laxity (P = .30) and rates of reoperation (P = .65), graft failure (P = .45), and cyclops lesions (P = .67) were not significantly different between ≥50% or <50% ACL remnant groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrate that primary anatomic ACL reconstruction using the SAMBBA technique significantly improved clinical and functional outcomes between baseline and follow-up at a minimum of 24 months. A low rate of complications was observed with this technique. No significant differences between large and moderate size ACL remnants were detected for all outcome measures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV case series with subgroup analysis.

A Rare Case of Intra-Articular Displacement of EndoButton Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

The EndoButton is a commonly used device for femoral fixation of anterior cruciate ligament grafts. Complications from its usage remain rare. Incorrect femoral tunnel placement may increase the risk of intra-articular displacement of the EndoButton. We present a case of anterior femoral tunnel placement resulting in intra-articular displacement of the EndoButton after failure. A 24-year-old man presented to us after failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction performed 3 years prior. Radiographs revealed an intra-articular displacement of the EndoButton. Intraoperatively, it was noted that the femoral tunnel exit was within the suprapatellar pouch, with the displaced EndoButton lodged between the posterior aspect of the lateral tibial plateau and the capsule. Intra-articular displacement of the EndoButton is a rare complication and has only been reported twice in the literature. Anterior placement of the femoral tunnel may predispose patients to this complication and it is recommended to check the EndoButton position intraoperatively to avoid such a complication, especially for the unexperienced surgeon.

Arthroscopic Technique to Reduce Suture Button Migration During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Procedure

Suture button-based femoral cortical suspension constructs of anterior cruciate ligament grafts can facilitate a fast and secure fixation. However, there are several case reports showing button malpositioning resulting from the inability to visualize the "flipped" button. Many current surgical techniques do not allow direct visualization of EndoButtons (Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA) in their final position, making it difficult to ensure that both buttons are fully flipped and that there is no soft-tissue interposition between the button and femur. We describe an arthroscopic technique for making femoral tunnels through the outside-in method that reduces the migration of the EndoButton through a lateral femoral portal. This technique may assist surgeons in understanding how to deal with and potentially avoid EndoButton migration during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Arthroscopic Control for Safe and Secure Seating of Suspensory Devices for Femoral Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Three Different Techniques

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of our technique that allows direct visualization of seating of suspensory devices in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Materials and Methods

Three different suspensory devices (TightRope RT, RetroButton, and EndoButton) were used in ACL reconstruction using 3 different techniques (outside-in, anteromedial [AM] portal, and transtibial techniques). Positioning of a guiding material and seating pattern of the suspensory devices were evaluated according to the surgical technique and suspensory device used.

Results

On the transtibial technique, 21 of total 26 cases (81%) of single bundle reconstructions and 22 of total 22 cases (100%) of double bundle reconstructions required superolateral capsulotomy where buttons were found in 21 of total 21 cases (100%) and 17 of 22 cases (77%), respectively. On the AM portal technique, all patients required capsulotomy and the button was found in only 18 of total 32 cases (56%) even after capsulotomy. On the outside-in technique, all patients required capsulotomy and the button was found in 86 of total 86 cases (100%).

Conclusions

Our technique for direct visualization of seating of the suspensory devices was more effective in outside-in and single bundle transtibial ACL reconstruction. However, it was less effective in double bundle transtibial and AM portal ACL reconstructions.

Self-flip Technique of the TightRope RT Button for Soft-Tissue Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

The TightRope RT (Arthrex, Naples, FL) is a suspensory device for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. However, there is a potential risk of the button being pulled too far off the lateral femoral cortex into the soft tissue because the adjustable loop is long. The purpose of this article is to present an easy and safe technique for self-flip. As to the preparation of the graft, we draw the first line in the loop of the TightRope RT at the same length as the femoral tunnel, and we draw the second line 7 mm longer than the length of the femoral tunnel as a self-flip line. Concerning passing of the graft, the side sutures are pulled from the lateral side. We stop pulling the sutures just at the self-flip line by holding the graft at the tibial end. The side suture is inclined to the medial side with strong pulling of the suture at full extension of the knee. Then the surgeon pulls the tibial end of the graft to feel a secure positioning of the button on the lateral femoral cortex. Although it has limitations, the present technique is easy and certainly helps surgeons achieve appropriate positioning of the button.

Secure fixation of femoral bone plug with a suspensory button in anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone graft

PURPOSE

the efficacy and safety of using a suspensory button for femoral fixation in anatomical anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft have not been established. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate bone plug integration onto the femoral socket and migration of the bone plug and the EndoButton (EB) (Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA, USA) after rectangular tunnel ACL reconstruction with BPTB autograft.

METHODS

thirty-four patients who underwent anatomical rectangular ACL reconstruction with BPTB graft using EB for femoral fixation and in whom three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) was performed one week and one year after surgery were included in this study. Bone plug integration onto the femoral socket, bone plug migration, soft tissue interposition, EB migration and EB rotation were evaluated on 3D CT. The clinical outcome was also assessed and correlated with the imaging outcomes.

RESULTS

the bone plug was integrated onto the femoral socket in all cases. The incidence of bone plug migration, soft tissue interposition, EB migration and EB rotation was 15, 15, 9 and 56%, respectively. No significant association was observed between the imaging outcomes. The postoperative mean Lysholm score was 97.1 ± 5.0 points. The postoperative side-to-side difference, evaluated using a KT-2000 arthrometer, averaged 0.5 ± 1.3 mm. There were no complications associated with EB use. Imaging outcomes did not affect the postoperative KT side-to-side difference.

CONCLUSIONS

the EB is considered a reliable device for femoral fixation in anatomical rectangular tunnel ACL reconstruction with BPTB autograft.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Early Postoperative Intratunnel Migration of an EndoButton After Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Case Report

CASE

We report a rare case of early postoperative migration of an EndoButton following anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with use of the EndoButton for femoral fixation. Although secure fixation of the EndoButton was confirmed during the operation, one-week postoperative radiographs revealed an intratunnel displacement of the posterolateral EndoButton. We performed a reoperation and refixed the EndoButton to the surface of the femoral cortex; we also hooked and tied both ends of the sutures to make a knot in order to prevent remigration.

CONCLUSION

Orthopaedic surgeons should be aware that EndoButton displacement and migration could arise at an early postoperative stage.

A Three-Dimensional Evaluation of EndoButton Displacement Direction After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in CT Image Using Tunnel Axis

The goal of this study was to propose a threedimensional evaluation of the EndoButton displacement direction after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) image by using the tunnel axis. The proposed method was applied experimentally to six subjects. The result of the simulated experiment revealed that the proposed method could analyze EndoButton displacement direction satisfactorily because the error was less than that of the MDCT image resolution. The clinical experiment results revealed displacement relative to the tunnel between time-zero and the followup point. We conclude that the proposed method can quantitatively evaluate the EndoButton displacement direction from the raw MDCT image after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; further, our findings suggest that the EndoButton was displaced relative to the tunnel between time-zero and the follow-up point.

Arthroscopically confirmed femoral button deployment

The anterior cruciate ligament TightRope RT (Arthrex, Naples, FL) is a graft suspension device for cruciate ligament reconstruction. It is an adjustable-length graft loop cortical fixation device designed to eliminate the requirement for loop length calculation and to facilitate complete graft fill of short femoral sockets that are common with anatomic anterior cruciate ligament placement. The adjustable loop length means "one size fits all," thus removing the need for multiple implant sizes and allowing graft tensioning even after fixation. However, the device has been associated with the same complications that have been described with EndoButton (Smith & Nephew Endoscopy, Andover, MA) fixation. The button of the TightRope RT may remain in the femoral tunnel rather than flipping outside of the tunnel to rest on the lateral femoral cortex, or it may become jammed inside the femoral canal. Conversely, the button may be pulled too far off the femoral cortex into the overlying soft tissue and flip in the substance of the vastus lateralis. We describe a new and simple arthroscopic technique to directly visualize the deployment and seating of the TightRope button on the lateral cortex of the femur to avoid all the aforementioned complications.

The effect of cortical button location on its post-operative migration in anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of EndoButton (Smith & Nephew Endoscopy, Andover, MA, USA) location on post-operative migration in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

Seventy-seven patients underwent anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction using EndoButtons. Comparing patient radiographs immediately post-operatively with those at 1 year, migration was defined when EndoButtons moved more than 1 mm or rotated over 5°. Initial location of EndoButtons was evaluated on radiographs immediately post-operatively. We measured distances from the EndoButton to the posterior and distal edge of the femur (D1, D2) on lateral radiographs and distances from the EndoButton to the lateral and distal edge of the femur (D3, D4) on anteroposterior radiographs. The relationship between supracondylar line and the ratio of migration was also investigated.

RESULTS

D1 in the migrated group were significantly lower than those in the non-migrated group (11.8 ± 12.7 vs. 16.0 ± 10.2 mm). D2, D3 and D4 were not of significant difference in the two groups. The ratio of migration in the area posterior to the supracondylar line was significantly higher than that in the anterior area (54.3 vs. 15.1%).

CONCLUSION

EndoButtons, which was located distally and posteriorly, especially in the area posterior to the lateral supracondylar line, migrated more frequently, although migration of the button had no effect on the clinical parameters evaluated in this study.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

It is preferable to settle EndoButton anteriorly to the lateral supracondylar line in order to avoid its migration for the graft tension due to our findings about the relationship between initial location of EndoButton and the rate of migration.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic case series, Level IV.

Iliotibial band irritation caused by the EndoButton after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: report of two cases

Two patients underwent arthroscopic anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using the EndoButton for femoral fixation. The femoral tunnels were created by the inside-out technique through a far anteromedial portal. The patients postoperatively developed moderate lateral knee pain without instability. At the second-look arthroscopic evaluation, the two EndoButtons were removed. Both patients were completely asymptomatic several months after implant removal, implying that the EndoButtons caused the mechanical irritation in the iliotibial band. This is the first report describing removal of EndoButtons because of pain caused by friction with the iliotibial band. In anatomic ACL reconstruction, if the femoral tunnel exit is positioned near the lateral femoral epicondyle, care should be taken to prevent iliotibial band friction syndrome that could result because of the EndoButton.

Comparison of femoral tunnel length between transportal and retrograde reaming outside-in techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy of intraoperative femoral tunnel length measurement and to compare this between the transportal (TP) and outside-in (OI) techniques for double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

Eighty patients underwent a DB ACL reconstruction using either the TP or the OI technique. The participants were randomized to either a TP group (I, 40 cases) or a OI group (II, 40 cases). The intraoperatively measured femoral tunnel length was recorded, and the postoperative femoral tunnel length was measured using computed tomography with OsiriX(®) imaging software.

RESULTS

The mean femoral tunnel lengths measured intraoperatively in Group II (38.9 ± 3.0 mm for anteromedial [AM], 39.3 ± 3.4 mm for posterolateral [PL]) were significantly longer than those of Group I (34.8 ± 2.7 mm for AM, 36.0 ± 3.2 mm for PL) (P < 0.001). The mean AM femoral tunnel length measured postoperatively in Group II (33.3 ± 3.8 mm) was significantly longer than that in Group I (31.1 ± 2.9 mm) (P = 0.006). The mean intraoperatively measured femoral tunnel length was significantly longer than that measured postoperatively in Groups I and II (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

After anatomic DB ACL reconstruction, the femoral tunnel length of the OI technique measured intraoperatively (AM/PL) and postoperatively (AM) was longer than those of the TP technique. The femoral tunnel length measured intraoperatively was longer than that measured postoperatively in both TP and OI technique. This study may help surgeons to measure femoral tunnel length accurately in anatomic DB ACL reconstruction with suspensory fixation device.

Seating of TightRope RT Button Under Direct Arthroscopic Visualization in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction to Prevent Potential Complications

The ACL TightRope RT (Arthrex, Naples, FL) is a recently introduced fixation device. The adjustable graft loop allows the surgeon some freedom in terms of the length of the femoral socket, eliminates the need for bothersome intraoperative calculations for selecting loop length, ensures that the socket is completely filled with graft, and provides the possibility of tensioning the graft even after graft fixation. However, the device can be associated with the same complications that have been described with EndoButton (Smith & Nephew Endoscopy, Andover, MA) fixation. For example, in our experience, sometimes the button of the TightRope RT may not flip, may become jammed inside the femoral canal, or may flip in the substance of the vastus lateralis. To prevent this, we have introduced 2 additional steps in our procedure: (1) direct visualization of the TightRope RT button in the femoral socket with the arthroscope during its passage and (2) a controlled push directly on the button with the help of a guide pin. Thus proper seating of the button is ensured by direct visualization and the crucial push helps in flipping and seating of the button.

Migration of EndoButton after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to (1) assess the migration of EndoButtons (Smith & Nephew Endoscopy, Andover, MA) with or without tissue interposition by comparing the radiographs obtained immediately after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and those obtained during the follow-up period and (2) investigate the effect of tissue interposition or migration of EndoButtons on the clinical outcomes.

METHODS

One hundred one patients underwent anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction with EndoButtons for femoral fixation. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were taken immediately postoperatively and at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year. The distance between the EndoButton and lateral femoral cortex was measured on the radiograph obtained immediately postoperatively, and more than 1 mm in distance was defined as positive tissue interposition. Moreover, the locations of the EndoButtons on the radiographs obtained at each follow-up visit were compared with those obtained immediately postoperatively, and EndoButton migration was considered to be present when the EndoButton had moved more than 1 mm or had rotated by more than 5°. The relations between clinical outcomes at 1 year and tissue interposition or migration of EndoButtons were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Tissue interposition was found for 51 EndoButtons and migration was observed for 71 EndoButtons, and there was a significant difference in the incidence of migration between anteromedial and posterolateral grafts. Of the 51 EndoButtons with tissue interposition, 32 migrated within 1 year, and 39 of 151 EndoButtons without tissue interposition migrated, whereas the EndoButtons with tissue interposition migrated significantly more frequently. On the other hand, there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the cases with or without tissue interposition and between the cases with or without EndoButton migration.

CONCLUSIONS

Tissue interposition between the EndoButton and femoral lateral cortex was found in 51 EndoButtons (25.2%) on the radiographs obtained immediately after ACL reconstruction, whereas EndoButtons with tissue interposition migrated more frequently than those without it 1 year after ACL reconstruction. However, neither tissue interposition nor migration of the EndoButton affected the clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, prognostic case series.

Detached femoral bone plug following anterior cruciate ligament repair

We report the case of a 16-year-old woman who experienced failure of her bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) reconstruction of her left anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) due to detachment of the femoral bone plug from the endobutton. We have only found one prior report of this unusual complication. This case is also notable in that evidence of this complication is visible radiographically. Most postoperative complications of ACL reconstruction can be visualized only with the assistance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Dropping of an EndoButton into the knee joint 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament repair using proximal fixation methods

One of the most discussed subjects regarding anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair methods is femoral fixation. One of the materials often used for fixation in recent years is the EndoButton (Acufex Microsurgical, Mansfield, MA), which provides rapid and secure fixation. Although many reports about femoral fixation with EndoButton have been published, insufficient information is available on possible complications. We have used 240 EndoButtons in our clinic for ACL repairs since 1997. The goal of this study was to report a case of ACL repair with an EndoButton, in which we experienced a complication. In this case, the EndoButton dropped into the knee joint after 2 years.

A prospective randomized study of patellar versus hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Bone-patellar tendon-bone graft has been the most commonly used graft material in anterior cruciate reconstructions, but there has been increasing use of hamstring tendon grafts. However, no existing clinical studies show adequate support for the choice of one graft over the other.

HYPOTHESIS

Hamstring tendons are equally as good as patellar tendon in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective randomized clinical trial.

METHODS

Ninety-nine patients with laxity caused by a torn anterior cruciate ligament underwent arthroscopically assisted reconstruction with graft randomization according to their birth year. Grafts were either bone-patellar tendon-bone with metal interference screw fixation or double-looped hamstring tendons with metal plate fixation. There were no significant differences between the two groups preoperatively or at operation. Standard rehabilitation included immediate postoperative mobilization without a knee brace, protected weightbearing for 2 weeks, and return to full activity at 6 to 12 months.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients in the patellar tendon group and 46 patients in the hamstring tendon group were available for clinical evaluation at a minimum of 21 months after surgery. No statistically significant differences were seen with respect to clinical and instrumented laxity testing, International Knee Documentation Committee Score ratings, isokinetic muscle torque measurements, and Kujala patellofemoral, Lysholm, and Tegner scores.

CONCLUSION

Equal results were seen for patellar and hamstring tendon autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions at 2 years after surgery. Both techniques seem to improve patients' performance.

EndoButton drill bit failure

A case of an EndoButton drill bit failure associated with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using semitendinosus gracilis autograft is reported. The distal 10 mm flutes of the drill bit sheared off prior to graft passage. This event was likely related to repeated use of this bit, which is intended for single use only. This case highlights another potential pitfall associated with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.