Novel thiophene derivatives for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

Ligand-based pharmacophore model of N-Aryl and N-Heteroaryl piperazine alpha 1A-adrenoceptors antagonists using GALAHAD

Computer aided drug discovery for selective antagonism effects on alpha(1A) subtypes of G-protein coupled receptors are important in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Ligand-based pharmacophore models of N-Aryl and N-Heteroaryl piperazine alpha(1A)-antagonists were developed using two separate training sets. Pharmacophore models were generated using the flexible align method within the GALAHAD module, implemented in SYBYL8.1 software. The most significant pharmacophore hypothesis, characterized by the conflicting demands of maximizing pharmacophore consensus, maximizing steric consensus, and minimizing energy, consisted of one positive nitrogen center, one donor atom center, two acceptor atom centers, and two hydrophobic groups. The most active compound in each class training set showed a good fit with all features of the pharmacophore proposed. The resulting models also had something in common with the hypothesis using the Catalyst software reported in other publications. These alpha(1A) pharmacophore models could predict compounds well, both in the training set and the test set. The pharmacophore models were also validated by an external dataset using a portion of the ZINC database. A 3D-QSAR model using the pharmacophore model to align the compounds was established in this study. The CoMFA model with the cross-validated q(2) value of 0.735 revealed that the model was valid. Our research provides a valuable tool for designing new therapeutic compounds with desired biological activity.

Selective pharmacophore design for α1-adrenoceptor subtypes

Alpha1-adrenoceptors are G-protein coupled receptors found in a variety of vascular tissues and responsible for vasoconstriction. Selectivity for each of the three subtypes is an important consideration in drug design in order to minimise the possibility of side effects. Using Catalyst we developed ligand-based pharmacophores from alpha(1a,b,d)-selective antagonists available in the literature using three separate training sets. Four-feature pharmacophores were developed for the alpha(1a) and alpha(1b) subtype-selective antagonists and a five-feature pharmacophore was developed for the alpha(1d) subtype-selective antagonists. The alpha(1a) pharmacophore represents both class I and II compounds with good predictivity for other compounds outside the training set as well. The alpha(1b) pharmacophore best predicts the activity of prazosin analogues as these make up the majority of alpha(1b)-selective antagonists. Unexpectedly, no positive ionisable feature was incorporated in the alpha(1b) pharmacophore. The alpha(1d) pharmacophore was based primarily on one structural class of compounds, but has good predictivity for a heterogeneous test set. Preliminary docking studies using AutoDock and optimised alpha1-adrenoceptor homology models, conducted with the antagonists prazosin (32) and 66, showed good agreement with the findings from the pharmacophores.

Synthesis, pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of 3-(4-aryl-piperazin-1-ylalkyl)-uracils as uroselective alpha1A-antagonists

Predominance in the urethra and prostate of the alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor subtype, which is believed to be the receptor mediating noradrenaline induced smooth muscle contraction in these tissues, led to the preparation of alpha(1A)-selective antagonists to be tested as uroselective compounds for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Thus, a number of selective alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor antagonists were synthesized and assayed in vitro for potency and selectivity. Dog pharmacokinetic parameters of 12 (RO700004) and its metabolite 40 (RO1104253) were established. The relative selectivity of intravenously administered 12, 40 and standard prazosin to inhibit hypogastric nerve stimulation-induced increases in intraurethral prostatic pressure versus phenylephrine-induced increases in diastolic blood pressure in anesthetized dogs was 76, 71 and 0.6, respectively.