Evaluation of Iron(III) Chelated Polymer Grafted Lignocellulosics for Arsenic(V) Adsorption in a Batch Reactor System

Immobilizing arsenic in soil via amine metal complex: a case study using iron-ethylenediamine

Fe-based nanomaterials have been extensively investigated for their application in mitigating arsenic (As) pollution in groundwater, sediment, and soils. Here, an iron-ethylenediamine (Fe-EDA) complex was synthesized and characterized using Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy before its use as an amendment to ameliorate As-polluted soils. Column leaching tests at three Fe-EDA application rates (1%, 3%, and 5%) were conducted, and their results were compared with those acquired after using nano zerovalent iron (nZVI) and Fe₃O₄, to assess their efficiency to amend As-contaminated paddy soils. After leaching, stabilization efficiency and soil chemical characteristics were determined. Additionally, As fractions were measured using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectroscopy by employing a sequential extraction procedure to evaluate the performance of the treatments and understand the underlying their mechanisms. Compared with the control treatment, the Fe-EDA treatment reduced As release by more than 35.33% in the 2nd leaching cycle, whereas nZVI and Fe₃O₄ decreased the As release by 11.84% and 24.60%, respectively. Moreover, the optimal addition of the Fe-EDA chelate was 5%, which stabilized more than 50% As in the soil from the 7th to 11th leaching cycles. After sequential extraction, the Fe-Mn oxide binding fraction, which was originally 12.65%, increased to 21.5%, 18.23%, and 21.71% after the application of nZVI, Fe₃O₄, and Fe-EDA amendments, respectively. Furthermore, our treatments promoted the binding of the As fraction with crystalline Fe (III) (oxyhydr)oxide (F3); however, other fractions did not increase considerably, suggesting that the Fe-EDA complex could effectively stabilize As through electrostatic attraction between the arsenate anion and EDA, as well as As-O-Fe bond formation via a coordinating reaction. Overall, Fe-EDA was found to be a potent amendment for mitigating As-polluted soil.

A review on the use of lignocellulosic materials for arsenic adsorption

In this review, bibliometric analysis was made of recent studies and current trends concerning the application of lignocellulosic materials as bioadsorbents for the removal of arsenic from aqueous systems. Evaluation was made of lignocellulosic adsorbents and their chemical characteristics, as well as interactions involved in the adsorption of arsenic, bioadsorbent reusage (desorption and re-adsorption), competition between co-existing ions in multi-element aqueous solutions, and applications of bioadsorbents in batch and continuous systems. Lignocellulosic biomass has been shown to be a promising source of new adsorbents, since it is a low-cost and renewable material. However, there seems to be no commercially available technology that uses bioadsorbents based on lignocellulosic biomass for arsenic removal. In addition, the structural modification of lignocellulosic biomass to improve its adsorption capacity and selectivity has proved to be a suitable strategy, with the service time and the selectivity of the bioadsorbent in the presence of co-existing ions the most critical aspects to be pursued. The competitive adsorption of co-existing anions (PO₄^3-, SO₄^2-, NO₃^-, and Cl^-) by the adsorption sites, as well as life-cycle assessment and cost analysis are rarely reported. Complexation, electrostatic attraction, ion exchange and precipitation were the main interactions involved in the adsorption of arsenic on lignocellulosic materials. However, most studies have failed to prove the nature of the interactions. Macroscopic methods can be useful to evaluate the adsorption mechanism of arsenic on bioadsorbents of complex structure, such as lignocellulosic biomass (modified or not). Nevertheless, the elucidation of the adsorption mechanism requires experiments based on measurements at the microscopic level. The upscaling of biosorption technology for arsenic removal will only be possible through studies that investigate: i) the interactions involved in the adsorption process; ii) the transfer of bench-scale experiments to pilot-scale experiments with real contaminated water with low arsenic concentration; and iii) the life-cycle assessment of biosorbents produced from lignocellulosic biomass.