1
|
Shahsavari D, Rao SSC. Review article: advances in the diagnosis and management of anorectal motility disorders. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2024; 60:701-714. [PMID: 39051556 DOI: 10.1111/apt.18170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2024] [Revised: 05/27/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anorectal motility disorders such as dyssynergic defecation (DD), faecal incontinence (FI) and anorectal pain affect 40% of the population and are a frequent reason for gastroenterology consultation. They significantly affect the quality of life and lead to psychological distress. Lack of understanding of these problems compounded by a lack of availability and knowledge of diagnostic tools in most medical centres and/or trained physicians has significantly hampered this field. AIMS To discuss the latest advances in pathophysiology, diagnostic tests and therapeutic options for these disorders using an evidence-based approach. METHODS We reviewed the published literature over the past 20 years on DD, FI and anorectal pain and distilled these into a narrative review. RESULTS A detailed history, prospective stool diary and digital rectal exam, together with diagnostic tests such as anorectal manometry, balloon expulsion test, translumbosacral anorectal magnetic stimulation test for assessing neuropathy, defecography and anal ultrasound, can provide detailed mechanistic and structural information. Such knowledge can pave the way for a meaningful and pathophysiologic-based management approach. This could include biofeedback therapy for DD or FI, sensory training for rectal hyposensitivity or sensory adaptation training for rectal hypersensitivity or sphincter bulking agents or neuromodulation therapies. These treatments are effective and safe. CONCLUSIONS Anorectal motility disorders are common, but either less well recognized or poorly managed by most gastroenterologists. Equipped with the practical and up-to-date knowledge provided in this review, physicians could provide improved health care for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dariush Shahsavari
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Satish S C Rao
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yan Y, Tennekoon K, Eubanks A, Herekar A, Shimoga D, Ayyala D, McLeod C, Kurek JA, Morgan JC, Rao SSC, Sharma A. Evaluation of bidirectional gut-brain axis and anorectal function in Parkinson's disease with constipation. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2024; 36:e14728. [PMID: 38105462 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative movement disorder with prodromal and highly prevalent gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, especially constipation. Although PD models suggest gut-brain axis dysfunction, the mechanistic underpinnings and their correlation with GI symptoms are poorly understood. AIM To examine the bidirectional gut-brain axis function in PD and correlate it with constipation severity, PD duration, and severity. METHODS Rectal sensory thresholds and afferent cortical evoked potentials (CEP) were assessed using a 4-ring EMG electrode probe. Efferent anal and rectal motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were obtained following transcranial and lumbosacral magnetic stimulation. Bowel symptoms were assessed by prospective stool diary. The CEP and MEP latencies, rectal sensory thresholds, and anorectal sensorimotor data were compared between PD subjects and age-adjusted healthy subjects. KEY RESULTS Twenty-five PD subjects with constipation (F/M = 6/19) and 20 healthy subjects (F/M = 14/6) were enrolled. The first and pain sensation thresholds were higher in PD subjects than healthy subjects (p < 0.002) but lost significance after adjustment for age. Age-adjusted rectal CEP and right-sided cortico-anal MEP latencies were prolonged in PD subjects compared to healthy subjects (p < 0.04). Also, half (4 of 8) age-adjusted spino-anal and rectal MEP latencies in PD subjects were significantly longer. In multivariate linear analysis, first rectal sensation and right-sided MEP latencies showed moderate correlation with constipation severity. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES Parkinson's disease is associated with significant bidirectional gut-brain axis dysfunction as evidenced by prolonged afferent and efferent neuronal signaling. Constipation severity in PD is correlated to abnormal rectal sensation and lateralized disturbance of efferent brain-gut signaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Yan
- Digestive Clinical Research Center, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Karunaratne Tennekoon
- Digestive Clinical Research Center, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Audrey Eubanks
- Digestive Clinical Research Center, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Anam Herekar
- Digestive Clinical Research Center, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Dhanush Shimoga
- Digestive Clinical Research Center, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Deepak Ayyala
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Colin McLeod
- Department of Neurology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Julie A Kurek
- Department of Neurology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - John C Morgan
- Department of Neurology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Satish S C Rao
- Digestive Clinical Research Center, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Amol Sharma
- Digestive Clinical Research Center, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Remes-Troche JM, Coss-Adame E, García-Zermeño KR, Gómez-Escudero O, Amieva-Balmori M, Gómez-Castaños PC, Charúa-Guindic L, Icaza-Chávez ME, López-Colombo A, Morel-Cerda EC, Pérez Y López N, Rodríguez-Leal MC, Salgado-Nesme N, Sánchez-Avila MT, Valdovinos-García LR, Vergara-Fernández O, Villar-Chávez AS. The Mexican consensus on fecal incontinence. REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA DE MEXICO (ENGLISH) 2023; 88:404-428. [PMID: 38097437 DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmxen.2023.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/01/2024]
Abstract
Fecal incontinence is the involuntary passage or the incapacity to control the release of fecal matter through the anus. It is a condition that significantly impairs quality of life in those that suffer from it, given that it affects body image, self-esteem, and interferes with everyday activities, in turn, favoring social isolation. There are no guidelines or consensus in Mexico on the topic, and so the Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología brought together a multidisciplinary group (gastroenterologists, neurogastroenterologists, and surgeons) to carry out the «Mexican consensus on fecal incontinence» and establish useful recommendations for the medical community. The present document presents the formulated recommendations in 35 statements. Fecal incontinence is known to be a frequent entity whose incidence increases as individuals age, but one that is under-recognized. The pathophysiology of incontinence is complex and multifactorial, and in most cases, there is more than one associated risk factor. Even though there is no diagnostic gold standard, the combination of tests that evaluate structure (endoanal ultrasound) and function (anorectal manometry) should be recommended in all cases. Treatment should also be multidisciplinary and general measures and drugs (lidamidine, loperamide) are recommended, as well as non-pharmacologic interventions, such as biofeedback therapy, in selected cases. Likewise, surgical treatment should be offered to selected patients and performed by experts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Remes-Troche
- Laboratorio de Fisiología Digestiva y Motilidad Gastrointestinal, Instituto de Investigaciones Médico Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz, Mexico.
| | - E Coss-Adame
- Departamento de Gastroenterología y Laboratorio de Motilidad Gastrointestinal, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición «Salvador Zubirán», Mexico City, Mexico
| | - K R García-Zermeño
- Gastroenterología y Motilidad Digestiva, CIGMA, Boca del Río, Veracruz, Mexico
| | - O Gómez-Escudero
- Clínica de Gastroenterología, Endoscopía Digestiva y Motilidad Gastrointestinal, Hospital Ángeles de Puebla, Puebla, Mexico
| | - M Amieva-Balmori
- Laboratorio de Fisiología Digestiva y Motilidad Gastrointestinal, Instituto de Investigaciones Médico Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz, Mexico
| | - P C Gómez-Castaños
- Centro de Investigación y Docencia en Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico
| | - L Charúa-Guindic
- Práctica privada, Coloproctología del Hospital Ángeles Lomas, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - M E Icaza-Chávez
- Hospital Christus Muguerza Faro del Mayab, Mérida, Yucatán, Mexico
| | - A López-Colombo
- UMAE Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Médico Nacional Manuel Ávila Camacho, IMSS Puebla, Puebla, Mexico
| | - E C Morel-Cerda
- Laboratorio de Motilidad Gastrointestinal, Hospital Civil Fray Antonio Alcalde, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
| | | | - M C Rodríguez-Leal
- Hospital Ángeles Valle Oriente, IMSS UMAE 25, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | - N Salgado-Nesme
- Departamento de Cirugía, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición «Salvador Zubirán», Mexico City,Mexico
| | - M T Sánchez-Avila
- Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | - L R Valdovinos-García
- Laboratorio de Motilidad Gastrointestinal Fundación Clínica Médica Sur, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - O Vergara-Fernández
- Departamento de Cirugía Colorrectal, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición «Salvador Zubirán», Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
[Analysis of anorectal manometry data in central and peripheral neurological deseases: Review of the literature]. Prog Urol 2022; 32:1505-1518. [PMID: 36030152 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Peripheral or central neurological deseases are providers of anorectal disorders of variable clinical expression (constipation, dyschezia, faecal incontinence (FI)…). Anorectal manometry (ARM) participates in their exploration to determine the underlying mechanisms, guide and optimize treatments. The objective of this work was to determine if there is a pattern of ARM data in neurological populations. MATERIALS ET METHODS Literature review from PubMed, Cochrane and Google scholar databases, using the following keywords: parkinsonian disorders; parkinson's disease; multiple slcerosis; neurolog*; spinal cord injury; spina bifida occulta; stroke; pudendal; endometriosis; peripheral nervous system diseases. 196 articles were isolated and finally 45 retained after reading the title and the abstract. RESULTS Data comparison was difficult due to the heterogeneity of techniques and thresholds used. In central lesions, resting and squeeze anal pressures were often altered. The presence of FI or constipation, the sex and the lesion level were factors influencing these data (low if complete injury, women or EDSS>5.5). In case of peripheral lesion, it is the anal tone and the contraction that varied the symptomatology. The sensory thresholds were variable regardless of the impairment. CONCLUSION This review did not identify a data pattern of ARM in central and peripheral neurological deseases. Gradual standardization of techniques and protocols will allow better comparison of data.
Collapse
|
5
|
Bharucha AE, Knowles CH, Mack I, Malcolm A, Oblizajek N, Rao S, Scott SM, Shin A, Enck P. Faecal incontinence in adults. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2022; 8:53. [PMID: 35948559 DOI: 10.1038/s41572-022-00381-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Faecal incontinence, which is defined by the unintentional loss of solid or liquid stool, has a worldwide prevalence of ≤7% in community-dwelling adults and can markedly impair quality of life. Nonetheless, many patients might not volunteer the symptom owing to embarrassment. Bowel disturbances, particularly diarrhoea, anal sphincter trauma (obstetrical injury or previous surgery), rectal urgency and burden of chronic illness are the main risk factors for faecal incontinence; others include neurological disorders, inflammatory bowel disease and pelvic floor anatomical disturbances. Faecal incontinence is classified by its type (urge, passive or combined), aetiology (anorectal disturbance, bowel symptoms or both) and severity, which is derived from the frequency, volume, consistency and nature (urge or passive) of stool leakage. Guided by the clinical features, diagnostic tests and therapies are implemented stepwise. When simple measures (for example, bowel modifiers such as fibre supplements, laxatives and anti-diarrhoeal agents) fail, anorectal manometry and other tests (endoanal imaging, defecography, rectal compliance and sensation, and anal neurophysiological tests) are performed as necessary. Non-surgical options (diet and lifestyle modification, behavioural measures, including biofeedback therapy, pharmacotherapy for constipation or diarrhoea, and anal or vaginal barrier devices) are often effective, especially in patients with mild faecal incontinence. Thereafter, perianal bulking agents, sacral neuromodulation and other surgeries may be considered when necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adil E Bharucha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Charles H Knowles
- Blizard Institute, Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Isabelle Mack
- University Hospital, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Allison Malcolm
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal North Shore Hospital and University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicholas Oblizajek
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Satish Rao
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - S Mark Scott
- Blizard Institute, Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery & Trauma, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Andrea Shin
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Paul Enck
- University Hospital, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Tübingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yan Y, Sharma A, Herekar AA, Jimenez E, Hudgi AR, Gu QG, Rao SSC. Translumbosacral Anorectal Magnetic Stimulation Test for Fecal Incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2022; 65:83-92. [PMID: 34670958 PMCID: PMC8665062 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuropathy may cause fecal incontinence and mixed fecal incontinence/constipation, but its prevalence is unclear, partly due to the lack of comprehensive testing of spino-anorectal innervation. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to develop and determine the clinical usefulness of a novel test, translumbosacral anorectal magnetic stimulation for fecal incontinence. DESIGN This observational cohort study was conducted from 2012 to 2018. SETTINGS This study was performed at a tertiary referral center. PATIENTS Patients with fecal incontinence, patients with mixed fecal incontinence/constipation, and healthy controls were included. INTERVENTIONS A translumbosacral anorectal magnetic stimulation test was performed by using an anorectal probe with 4 ring electrodes and magnetic coil, and by stimulating bilateral lumbar and sacral plexuses, uses and recording 8 motor-evoked potentials at anal and rectal sites. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The prevalence of lumbar and/or sacral neuropathy was examined. Secondary outcomes were correlation of neuropathy with anorectal sensorimotor function(s) and morphological changes. RESULTS We evaluated 220 patients: 144 with fecal incontinence, 76 with mixed fecal incontinence/constipation, and 31 healthy controls. All 8 lumbar and sacral motor-evoked potential latencies were significantly prolonged (p < 0.01) in fecal incontinence and mixed fecal incontinence/constipation groups compared with controls. Neuropathy was patchy and involved 4.0 (3.0) (median (interquartile range)) sites. Lumbar neuropathy was seen in 29% to 65% of the patients in the fecal incontinence group and 22% to 61% of the patients in the mixed fecal incontinence/constipation group, and sacral neuropathy was seen in 24% to 64% and 29% to 61% of these patients. Anal neuropathy was significantly more (p < 0.001) prevalent than rectal neuropathy in both groups. There was no correlation between motor-evoked potential latencies and anal sphincter pressures, rectal sensation, or anal sphincter defects. LIMITATIONS No comparative analysis with electromyography was performed. CONCLUSION Lumbar or sacral plexus neuropathy was detected in 40% to 75% of patients with fecal incontinence with a 2-fold greater prevalence at the anal region than the rectum. Lumbosacral neuropathy appears to be an independent mechanism in the pathogenesis of fecal incontinence, unassociated with other sensorimotor dysfunctions. Translumbosacral anorectal magnetic stimulation has a high yield and is a safe and clinically useful neurophysiological test. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B728. PRUEBA DE ESTIMULACIN MAGNTICA TRANSLUMBOSACRAL ANORECTAL PARA LA INCONTINENCIA FECAL ANTECEDENTES:La neuropatía puede causar incontinencia fecal y una combinación de incontinencia fe-cal/estreñimiento, pero su prevalencia no está clara, en parte debido a la falta de pruebas comple-tas de inervación espino-anorrectal.OBJETIVO:Desarrollar y determinar la utilidad clínica de una nueva prueba, estimulación magnética trans-lumbosacral anorrectal para la incontinencia fecal.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte observacional del 2012 al 2018.ENTORNO CLINICO:Centro de referencia terciario.PACIENTES:Pacientes con incontinencia fecal, combinación de incontinencia fecal/estreñimiento y controles sanos.INTERVENCIONES:Se realizó una prueba de estimulación magnética translumbosacral anorrectal utilizando una sonda anorrectal con 4 electrodos anulares y bobina magnética, y estimulando los plexos lumbares y sacros bilaterales y registrando ocho potenciales evocados motores las regiones anal y rectal.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se examinó la prevalencia de neuropatía lumbar y/o sacra. Los resultados secundarios fueron la correlación de la neuropatía con las funciones sensitivomotoras anorrectales y cambios morfológi-cos.RESULTADOS:Evaluamos 220 pacientes, 144 con incontinencia fecal, 76 con combinación de incontinencia fe-cal/estreñimiento y 31 sujetos sanos. Las ocho latencias de los potenciales evocadas motoras lum-bares y sacras se prolongaron significativamente (p <0,01) en la incontinencia fecal y el grupo mixto en comparación con los controles. La neuropatía fue irregular y afectaba 4,0 (3,0) (mediana (rango intercuartílico) sitios. Se observó neuropatía lumbar en 29-65% en la incontinencia fecal y 22-61% en el grupo mixto, y neuropatía sacra en 24-64% y 29-61 % de pacientes respectivamen-te. La neuropatía anal fue significativamente más prevalente (p <0,001) que la rectal en ambos grupos. No hubo correlación entre las latencias de los potenciales evocadas motoras y las presio-nes del esfínter anal, la sensación rectal o los defectos del esfínter anal.LIMITACIONES:Sin análisis comparativo con electromiografía.CONCLUSIÓNES:Se detectó neuropatía del plexo lumbar o sacro en el 40-75% de los pacientes con incontinencia fecal con una prevalencia dos veces mayor en la región anal que en el recto. La neuropatía lumbo-sacra parece ser un mecanismo independiente en la patogenia de la incontinencia fecal, no asocia-do con otras disfunciones sensitivomotoras. La estimulación magnética translumbosacral anorrec-tal tiene un alto rendimiento, es una prueba neurofisiológica segura y clínicamente útil. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B728.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Yan
- Division of Neurogastroenterology/Motility, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bharucha AE, Gantz MG, Rao SS, Lowry AC, Chua H, Karunaratne T, Wu J, Hamilton FA, Whitehead WE. Comparative effectiveness of biofeedback and injectable bulking agents for treatment of fecal incontinence: Design and methods. Contemp Clin Trials 2021; 107:106464. [PMID: 34139357 PMCID: PMC8429255 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Revised: 05/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Fecal incontinence (FI), the involuntary passage of stool, is common and can markedly impair the quality of life. Among patients who fail initial options (pads or protective devices, bowel modifying agents, and pelvic floor exercises), the options are pelvic floor biofeedback (BIO), perianal injection with bulking agents (INJ), and sacral nerve electrical stimulation (SNS), which have not been subjected to head-to-head comparisons. This study will compare the safety and efficacy of BIO and INJ for managing FI. The impact of these approaches on quality-of-life and psychological distress, cost effectiveness, and predictors of response to therapy will also be evaluated. Six centers in the United States will enroll approximately 285 patients with moderate to severe FI. Patients who have 4 or more FI episodes over 2 weeks proceed to a 4-week trial of enhanced medical management (EMM) (ie, education, bowel management, and pelvic floor exercises). Thereafter, 194 non-responders as defined by a less than 75% reduction in the frequency of FI will be randomized to BIO or INJ. Three months later, the efficacy, safety, and cost of therapy will be assessed; non-responders will be invited to choose to add the other treatment or SNS for the remainder of the study. Early EMM responders will be re-evaluated 3 months later and non-responders randomized to BIO or INJ. Standardized, and where appropriate validated approaches will be used for study procedures, which will be performed by trained personnel. Prospectively collected data on care costs and resource utilization will be used for cost effectiveness analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adil E. Bharucha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Mn
| | - Marie G. Gantz
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology Division, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC
| | - Satish S. Rao
- Division of Gastroenterology, Augusta University, Augusta, Ga
| | - Ann C. Lowry
- Colon and Rectal Surgery Associates, Minneapolis, Mn
| | - Heidi Chua
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Mn
| | | | - Jennifer Wu
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Frank A. Hamilton
- National Institute of Digestive Diseases, Kidney, and Diabetes, Bethesda, MD
| | - William E. Whitehead
- Center for Functional GI and Motility Disorders, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Translumbosacral Neuromodulation Therapy for Fecal Incontinence: A Randomized Frequency Response Trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2021; 116:162-170. [PMID: 32740081 PMCID: PMC9455260 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Treatments for fecal incontinence (FI) remain unsatisfactory because they do not remedy the underlying multifactorial dysfunction(s) including anorectal neuropathy. The aim of this study was to investigate the optimal dose frequency, clinical effects, and safety of a novel treatment, translumbosacral neuromodulation therapy (TNT), aimed at improving neuropathy. METHODS Patients with FI were randomized to receive 6 sessions of weekly TNT treatments consisting of 600 repetitive magnetic stimulations over each of 2 lumbar and 2 sacral sites with either 1, 5, or 15 Hz frequency. Stool diaries, FI severity indices, anorectal neurophysiology and sensorimotor function, and quality of life were compared. Primary outcome measure was the change in FI episodes/week. Responders were patients with ≥50% decrease in weekly FI episodes. RESULTS Thirty-three patients with FI participated. FI episodes decreased significantly (∆ ±95% confidence interval, 4.2 ± 2.8 (1 Hz); 2 ± 1.7 (5 Hz); 3.4 ± 2.5 (15 Hz); P < 0.02) in all 3 groups when compared with baseline. The 1 Hz group showed a significantly higher (P = 0.04) responder rate (91 ± 9.1%) when compared with the 5 Hz group (36 ± 18.2%) or 15 Hz (55 ± 18.2%); no difference was found between the 5 and 15 Hz groups (P = 0.667). Anal neuropathy, squeeze pressure, and rectal capacity improved significantly only in the 1 Hz (P < 0.05) group compared with baseline, but not in other groups. Quality of life domains improved significantly (P < 0.05) with 1 and 5 Hz groups. No device-related serious adverse events were noted. DISCUSSION TNT significantly improves FI symptoms in the short term, and the 1 Hz frequency was overall better than 5 and 15 Hz. Both anorectal neuropathy and physiology significantly improved, demonstrating mechanistic improvement. TNT is a promising, novel, safe, efficacious, and noninvasive treatment for FI (see Visual Abstract, Supplementary Digital Content 3, http://links.lww.com/AJG/B598).
Collapse
|
9
|
Curtin B, Jimenez E, Rao SSC. Clinical Evaluation of a Patient With Symptoms of Colonic or Anorectal Motility Disorders. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2020; 26:423-436. [PMID: 32989182 PMCID: PMC7547199 DOI: 10.5056/jnm20012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Revised: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Constipation, irritable bowel syndrome, fecal incontinence, abdominal pain, and anorectal pain are problems that affect 40% of the population. They commonly present with overlapping symptoms indicating that their pathophysiology affects multiple segments of the gut as well as brain and gut interactions. Clinically, although some conditions are readily recognized, dyssynergic defecation, fecal incontinence, and anorectal pain are often missed or misdiagnosed. Consequently, the assessment of lower gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with suspected colonic or anorectal motility disorder(s) remains challenging for most clinicians. A detailed history, use of the Bristol stool form scale, prospective stool diaries, ideally through a phone App, digital rectal examination, and judicious use of complementary diagnostic tests are essential. Additionally, it is important to evaluate the impact of these problems on quality of life and psychosocial issues, because they are intricately linked with these disorders. The Rome IV diagnostic questionnaire for functional gastrointestinal disorders can provide additional information often missed during history taking. Here, we discuss a systematic approach for the clinical evaluation of patients with suspected lower gastrointestinal problems, grouped under 4 common diagnostic categories. We describe how to take a detailed history, perform meticulous digital rectal examination, and use validated tools to supplement clinical evaluation, including assessments of quality of life and scoring systems for disease severity and digital Apps. These tools could facilitate a comprehensive plan for clinical management including diagnostic tests, and translate the patients' complaints into definable, diagnostic categories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan Curtin
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Health Center, Augusta University, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Enoe Jimenez
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Health Center, Augusta University, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Satish S C Rao
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Health Center, Augusta University, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jiang AC, Panara A, Yan Y, Rao SSC. Assessing Anorectal Function in Constipation and Fecal Incontinence. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2020; 49:589-606. [PMID: 32718572 DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2020.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Constipation and fecal incontinence are commonly encountered complaints in the gastrointestinal clinic. Assessment of anorectal function includes comprehensive history, rectal examination, and prospective stool diary or electronic App diary that accurately captures bowel symptoms, evaluation of severity, and quality of life of measure. Evaluation of a suspected patient with dyssynergic constipation includes anorectal manometry, balloon expulsion test, and defecography. Investigation of a suspected patient with fecal incontinence includes high-resolution anorectal manometry; anal ultrasound or MRI; and neurophysiology tests, such as translumbosacral anorectal magnetic stimulation or pudendal nerve latency. This article provides an approach to the assessment of anorectal function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice C Jiang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, 600 S Paulina St, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| | - Ami Panara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, 1601 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Yun Yan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Satish S C Rao
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Augusta University Medical Center, 1120 15th Street, AD 2226, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Anorectal disorders encompass structural, neuromuscular, and functional disorders. They are common, often distressing, and in some cases debilitating, and significantly add to the health care burden. They present with multiple, overlapping symptoms that can often obscure the underlying pathology and can pose significant diagnostic and management dilemmas. A meticulous history and comprehensive digital rectal examination can provide clarity on the diagnosis, appropriate testing, and management of these conditions. Today, with the development of sophisticated diagnostic tools such as high-resolution and high-definition (3-D) anorectal manometry, 3-D anal ultrasonography, magnetic resonance defecography and imaging, and neurophysiological tests such as translumbosacral anorectal magnetic stimulation, it is possible to more accurately define and characterize the underlying structural and functional abnormalities. In this review, we present a succinct update on the latest knowledge with regards to the pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of anal fissure, hemorrhoids, rectal prolapse, intussusception, rectocele, solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, levator ani syndrome, dyssynergic defecation and fecal incontinence.
Collapse
|
12
|
Rao SS, Xiang X, Yan Y, Rattanakovit K, Patcharatrakul T, Parr R, Ayyala D, Sharma A. Randomised clinical trial: linaclotide vs placebo-a study of bi-directional gut and brain axis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2020; 51:1332-1341. [PMID: 32406112 PMCID: PMC7384154 DOI: 10.1111/apt.15772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2019] [Revised: 01/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Linaclotide, a guanylate cyclase C agonist relieves irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation (IBS-C) symptoms, but how it improves pain in humans is unknown. AIMS To investigate the effects of linaclotide and placebo on the afferent and efferent gut-brain-gut signalling in IBS-C patients, in a randomised clinical trial. METHODS Patients with IBS-C (Rome III) and rectal hypersensitivity were randomised (2:1) to receive linaclotide (290 µg) or placebo for 10 weeks and undergo bi-directional gut and brain axis assessment using anorectal electrical stimulations and transcranial/transspinal-anorectal magnetic stimulations. Rectal sensations were examined by balloon distention. Assessments included abdominal pain, bowel symptoms and quality of life (QOL) scores. Primary outcomes were latencies of recto-cortical and cortico-rectal evoked potentials. RESULTS Thirty-nine patients participated; 26 received linaclotide and 13 received placebo. Rectal cortical evoked potentials latencies (milliseconds) were significantly prolonged with linaclotide compared to baseline (P1:Δ 19 ± 6, P < 0.005; N1:Δ 20 ± 7, P < 0.02) but not with placebo (P1:Δ 3 ± 5; N1:Δ 4.7 ± 5,P = 0.3) or between groups. The efferent cortico-anorectal and spino-anorectal latencies were unchanged. The maximum tolerable rectal volume (cc) increased significantly with linaclotide compared to baseline (P < 0.001) and placebo (Δ 29 ± 10 vs 4 ± 20, (P < 0.03). Abdominal pain decreased (P < 0.001) with linaclotide but not between groups. Complete spontaneous bowel movement frequency increased (P < 0.001), and IBS-QOL scores improved (P = 0.01) with linaclotide compared to baseline and placebo. There was no difference in overall responders between linaclotide and placebo (54% vs 23%, P = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS Linaclotide prolongs afferent gut-brain signalling from baseline but both afferent and efferent signalling were unaffected compared to placebo. Linaclotide significantly improves rectal hypersensitivity, IBS-C symptoms and QOL compared to placebo. These mechanisms may explain the effects of linaclotide on pain relief in IBS-C patients. ClinicalTrials.Gov: Registered at Clinical trials.gov no NCT02078323.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satish S.C. Rao
- Division of Neurogastroenterology/MotilityMedical College of GeorgiaAugusta UniversityAugustaGAUSA
| | - Xuelian Xiang
- Division of Neurogastroenterology/MotilityMedical College of GeorgiaAugusta UniversityAugustaGAUSA
| | - Yun Yan
- Division of Neurogastroenterology/MotilityMedical College of GeorgiaAugusta UniversityAugustaGAUSA
| | - Kulthep Rattanakovit
- Division of Neurogastroenterology/MotilityMedical College of GeorgiaAugusta UniversityAugustaGAUSA
| | - Tanisa Patcharatrakul
- Division of Neurogastroenterology/MotilityMedical College of GeorgiaAugusta UniversityAugustaGAUSA
| | - Rachael Parr
- Division of Neurogastroenterology/MotilityMedical College of GeorgiaAugusta UniversityAugustaGAUSA
| | - Deepak Ayyala
- Division of Neurogastroenterology/MotilityMedical College of GeorgiaAugusta UniversityAugustaGAUSA
| | - Amol Sharma
- Division of Neurogastroenterology/MotilityMedical College of GeorgiaAugusta UniversityAugustaGAUSA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To evaluate and report current evidence regarding the management of bowel dysfunction in spinal cord injury. There is a paucity of high-quality large studies on which to base management advice. RECENT FINDINGS Recent research has focused on defining the nature of symptomatology of bowel dysfunction in SCI and describing the effects on quality of life and social interactions. Technical aspects of colonoscopy have received attention, and aspects of understanding the pathophysiology in relation to both neural and non-neural dysfunction have been studied. There has been refinement and expansion of the pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment options for bowel dysfunction in SCI. Management of bowel dysfunction in SCI requires a comprehensive and individualized approach, encompassing lifestyle, toileting routine, stimulation, diet, medications, and surgery. Further high-quality research is required to inform best practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhengyan Qi
- Neurogastroenterology Unit and Department of Gastroenterology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Road, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - James W Middleton
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Level 12, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
| | - Allison Malcolm
- Neurogastroenterology Unit and Department of Gastroenterology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Road, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia.
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Carrington EV, Scott SM, Bharucha A, Mion F, Remes-Troche JM, Malcolm A, Heinrich H, Fox M, Rao SS. Expert consensus document: Advances in the evaluation of anorectal function. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 15:309-323. [PMID: 29636555 PMCID: PMC6028941 DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2018.27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 130] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Faecal incontinence and evacuation disorders are common, impair quality of life and incur substantial economic costs worldwide. As symptoms alone are poor predictors of underlying pathophysiology and aetiology, diagnostic tests of anorectal function could facilitate patient management in those cases that are refractory to conservative therapies. In the past decade, several major technological advances have improved our understanding of anorectal structure, coordination and sensorimotor function. This Consensus Statement provides the reader with an appraisal of the current indications, study performance characteristics, clinical utility, strengths and limitations of the most widely available tests of anorectal structure (ultrasonography and MRI) and function (anorectal manometry, neurophysiological investigations, rectal distension techniques and tests of evacuation, including defecography). Additionally, this article provides our consensus on the clinical relevance of these tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma V. Carrington
- National Bowel Research Centre, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - S. Mark Scott
- National Bowel Research Centre, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Adil Bharucha
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - François Mion
- Exploration Fonctionnelle Digestive, Hospital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon I University and Inserm 1032 LabTAU, Lyon, France
| | - Jose M. Remes-Troche
- Laboratorio de Fisiología Digestiva y Motilidad Gastrointestinal, Instituto de Investigaciones Médico Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz, México
| | - Allison Malcolm
- Division of Gastroenterology, Royal North Shore Hospital, and University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Henriette Heinrich
- National Bowel Research Centre, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Mark Fox
- Abdominal Center: Gastroenterology, St. Claraspital, Basel, Switzerland
- Clinic for Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Satish S. Rao
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sharma A, Kurek J, Morgan JC, Wakade C, Rao SSC. Constipation in Parkinson's Disease: a Nuisance or Nuanced Answer to the Pathophysiological Puzzle? Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2018; 20:1. [PMID: 29350301 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-018-0609-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Chronic constipation is a common, nonmotor, and prodromal symptom in Parkinson's disease (PD). Its underlying neuropathology may provide pathophysiological insight into PD. Here, we critically review what is currently known about the neuroanatomical and brain-gut interactions, and the origin and progression of Lewy pathology (LP) at three levels-brain/brainstem, spinal cord, and enteric nervous system. RECENT FINDINGS Many recent studies have illustrated the challenges of examining LP in tissues obtained from colon biopsies of PD patients. Large-scale epidemiological studies have not confirmed the widely accepted Braakpostula. In this review, we propose an alternative origin and route of spread of LP in PD. We describe novel, noninvasive neurophysiological testing that could advance the understanding of LP and complex bidirectional brain-pelvic floor neural pathways in PD-a true disease model of a neurogastrointestinal disorder. This review may provide the impetus for future studies investigating gut and brain interaction and constipation in PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amol Sharma
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University Medical Center, 1120 15th Street, AD-2226, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA.
| | - Julie Kurek
- Parkinson's Foundation Center of Excellence, Movement Disorders Program, Department of Neurology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - John C Morgan
- Parkinson's Foundation Center of Excellence, Movement Disorders Program, Department of Neurology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Chandramohan Wakade
- Department of Physical Therapy, College of Allied Health Sciences, Augusta University & Charlie Norwood VAMC, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Satish S C Rao
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University Medical Center, 1120 15th Street, AD-2226, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rao SS, Bharucha AE, Chiarioni G, Felt-Bersma R, Knowles C, Malcolm A, Wald A. Functional Anorectal Disorders. Gastroenterology 2016; 150:S0016-5085(16)00175-X. [PMID: 27144630 PMCID: PMC5035713 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.009 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2016] [Accepted: 02/09/2016] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
This report defines criteria and reviews the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of common anorectal disorders: fecal incontinence (FI), functional anorectal pain and functional defecation disorders. FI is defined as the recurrent uncontrolled passage of fecal material for at least 3 months. The clinical features of FI are useful for guiding diagnostic testing and therapy. Anorectal manometry and imaging are useful for evaluating anal and pelvic floor structure and function. Education, antidiarrheals and biofeedback therapy are the mainstay of management; surgery may be useful in refractory cases. Functional anorectal pain syndromes are defined by clinical features and categorized into three subtypes. In proctalgia fugax, the pain is typically fleeting and lasts for seconds to minutes. In levator ani syndrome (LAS) and unspecified anorectal pain the pain lasts more than 30 minutes, but in LAS there is puborectalis tenderness. Functional defecation disorders are defined by >2 symptoms of chronic constipation or irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, and with >2 features of impaired evacuation i.e., abnormal evacuation pattern on manometry, abnormal balloon expulsion test or impaired rectal evacuation by imaging. It includes two subtypes; dyssynergic defecation and inadequate defecatory propulsion. Pelvic floor biofeedback therapy is effective for treating LAS and defecatory disorders.
Collapse
|
17
|
Rao SS, Bharucha AE, Chiarioni G, Felt-Bersma R, Knowles C, Malcolm A, Wald A. Functional Anorectal Disorders. Gastroenterology 2016; 150:S0016-5085(16)00175-X. [PMID: 27144630 PMCID: PMC5035713 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 278] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2016] [Accepted: 02/09/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
This report defines criteria and reviews the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of common anorectal disorders: fecal incontinence (FI), functional anorectal pain and functional defecation disorders. FI is defined as the recurrent uncontrolled passage of fecal material for at least 3 months. The clinical features of FI are useful for guiding diagnostic testing and therapy. Anorectal manometry and imaging are useful for evaluating anal and pelvic floor structure and function. Education, antidiarrheals and biofeedback therapy are the mainstay of management; surgery may be useful in refractory cases. Functional anorectal pain syndromes are defined by clinical features and categorized into three subtypes. In proctalgia fugax, the pain is typically fleeting and lasts for seconds to minutes. In levator ani syndrome (LAS) and unspecified anorectal pain the pain lasts more than 30 minutes, but in LAS there is puborectalis tenderness. Functional defecation disorders are defined by >2 symptoms of chronic constipation or irritable bowel syndrome with constipation, and with >2 features of impaired evacuation i.e., abnormal evacuation pattern on manometry, abnormal balloon expulsion test or impaired rectal evacuation by imaging. It includes two subtypes; dyssynergic defecation and inadequate defecatory propulsion. Pelvic floor biofeedback therapy is effective for treating LAS and defecatory disorders.
Collapse
|
18
|
Alavi K, Chan S, Wise P, Kaiser AM, Sudan R, Bordeianou L. Fecal Incontinence: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management. J Gastrointest Surg 2015; 19:1910-1921. [PMID: 26268955 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-015-2905-1] [citation(s)] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2014] [Accepted: 07/27/2015] [Indexed: 08/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fecal incontinence is a debilitating condition affecting primarily the elderly. Many patients suffer in silence resulting in both underdiagnosis and undertreatment often culminating in an overall poor quality of life. METHODS We sought to review the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of fecal incontinence based on current literature. Additionally, newer treatment methods such as Solesta will be evaluated. RESULTS There are many diagnostic modalities available to assess the degree and severity of the patient's incontinence; however, a thorough history and physical exam is critical. Initial attempts at treatment focus on medical management primarily through stool texture modification with the aid of bulking agents. Failure of medical therapy is often followed by a graded increase in the complexity and invasiveness of the available treatment options. The selection of the most appropriate surgical option, such as overlapping sphincteroplasty and neuromodulation, is multifactorial involving both surgeon and patient-related factors. Neuromodulation has received increased attention in the last decade due to its documented therapeutic success, and newer office-based procedures, such as the Solesta injection, are showing promising results in properly selected patients. Finally, diversion remains an option for select patients who have failed all other therapies. CONCLUSION The etiology of fecal incontinence is multifactorial, involving a complex interplay between stool consistency and anatomic integrity. The diagnosis and treatment of fecal incontinence continue to evolve and are showing promising results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karim Alavi
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, 67 Belmont Street, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA.
| | - Sook Chan
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, 67 Belmont Street, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA
| | - Paul Wise
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Andreas M Kaiser
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ranjan Sudan
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Liliana Bordeianou
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fecal Incontinence: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management. J Gastrointest Surg 2015; 19:1910-21. [PMID: 26268955 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-015-2905-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2014] [Accepted: 07/27/2015] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fecal incontinence is a debilitating condition affecting primarily the elderly. Many patients suffer in silence resulting in both underdiagnosis and undertreatment often culminating in an overall poor quality of life. METHODS We sought to review the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of fecal incontinence based on current literature. Additionally, newer treatment methods such as Solesta will be evaluated. RESULTS There are many diagnostic modalities available to assess the degree and severity of the patient's incontinence; however, a thorough history and physical exam is critical. Initial attempts at treatment focus on medical management primarily through stool texture modification with the aid of bulking agents. Failure of medical therapy is often followed by a graded increase in the complexity and invasiveness of the available treatment options. The selection of the most appropriate surgical option, such as overlapping sphincteroplasty and neuromodulation, is multifactorial involving both surgeon and patient-related factors. Neuromodulation has received increased attention in the last decade due to its documented therapeutic success, and newer office-based procedures, such as the Solesta injection, are showing promising results in properly selected patients. Finally, diversion remains an option for select patients who have failed all other therapies. CONCLUSION The etiology of fecal incontinence is multifactorial, involving a complex interplay between stool consistency and anatomic integrity. The diagnosis and treatment of fecal incontinence continue to evolve and are showing promising results.
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Fecal incontinence (FI) is a multifactorial disorder that imposes considerable social and economic burdens. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of current and emerging treatment options for FI. A MEDLINE search was conducted for English-language articles related to FI prevalence, etiology, diagnosis, and treatment published from January 1, 1990 through June 1, 2013. The search was extended to unpublished trials on ClinicalTrials.gov and relevant publications cited in included articles. Conservative approaches, including dietary modifications, medications, muscle-strengthening exercises, and biofeedback, have been shown to provide short-term benefits. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation was considered ineffective in a randomized clinical trial. Unlike initial studies, sacral nerve stimulation has shown reasonable short-term effectiveness and some complications. Dynamic graciloplasty and artificial sphincter and bowel devices lack randomized controlled trials and have shown inconsistent results and high rates of explantation. Of injectable bulking agents, dextranomer microspheres in non-animal stabilized hyaluronic acid (NASHA Dx) has shown significant improvement in incontinence scores and frequency of incontinence episodes, with generally mild adverse effects. For the treatment of FI, conservative measures and biofeedback therapy are modestly effective. When conservative therapies are ineffective, invasive procedures, including sacral nerve stimulation, may be considered, but they are associated with complications and lack randomized, controlled trials. Bulking agents may be an appropriate alternative therapy to consider before more aggressive therapies in patients who fail conservative therapies.
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neurologic dysfunction causes fecal incontinence, but current techniques for its assessment are limited and controversial. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this work was to investigate spino-rectal and spino-anal motor-evoked potentials simultaneously using lumbar and sacral magnetic stimulation in subjects with fecal incontinence and healthy subjects and to compare motor-evoked potentials and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency in subjects with fecal incontinence. DESIGN This was a prospective, observational study. SETTINGS The study took place in 2 tertiary care centers. PATIENTS Subjects included adults with fecal incontinence and healthy subjects. INTERVENTIONS Translumbar and transsacral magnetic stimulations were performed bilaterally by applying a magnetic coil to the lumbar and sacral regions in 50 subjects with fecal incontinence (1 or more episodes per week) and 20 healthy subjects. Both motor-evoked potentials and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency were assessed in 30 subjects with fecal incontinence. Stimulation-induced, motor-evoked potentials were recorded simultaneously from the rectum and anus with 2 pairs of bipolar ring electrodes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Latency and amplitude of motor-evoked potentials after lumbosacral magnetic stimulation and agreement with pudendal nerve terminal motor latency were measured. RESULTS When compared with control subjects, 1 or more lumbo-anal, lumbo-rectal, sacro-anal, or sacro-rectal motor-evoked potentials were significantly prolonged (p < 0.01) and were abnormal in 44 (88%) of 50 subjects with fecal incontinence. Positive agreement between abnormal motor-evoked potentials and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency was 63%, whereas negative agreement was 13%. Motor-evoked potentials were abnormal in more (p < 0.05) subjects with fecal incontinence than pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, in 26 (87%) of 30 versus 19 (63%) of 30, and in 24% of subjects with normal pudendal nerve terminal motor latency. There were no adverse events. LIMITATIONS Anal EMG was not performed. CONCLUSIONS Translumbar and transsacral magnetic stimulation-induced, motor-evoked potentials provide objective evidence for rectal or anal neuropathy in subjects with fecal incontinence and could be useful. The test was superior to pudendal nerve terminal motor latency and appears to be safe and well tolerated.
Collapse
|
22
|
Lee YY. What's New in the Toolbox for Constipation and Fecal Incontinence? Front Med (Lausanne) 2014; 1:5. [PMID: 25705618 PMCID: PMC4335388 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2014.00005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2014] [Accepted: 03/13/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Constipation and fecal incontinence (FI) are common complaints predominantly affecting the elderly and women. They are associated with significant morbidity and high healthcare costs. The causes are often multi-factorial and overlapping. With the advent of new technologies, we have a better understanding of their underlying pathophysiology which may involve disruption at any levels along the gut-brain-microbiota axis. Initial approach to management should always be the exclusion of secondary causes. Mild symptoms can be approached with conservative measures that may include dietary modifications, exercise, and medications. New prokinetics (e.g., prucalopride) and secretagogues (e.g., lubiprostone and linaclotide) are effective and safe in constipation. Biofeedback is the treatment of choice for dyssynergic defecation. Refractory constipation may respond to neuromodulation therapy with colectomy as the last resort especially for slow-transit constipation of neuropathic origin. Likewise, in refractory FI, less invasive approach can be tried first before progressing to more invasive surgical approach. Injectable bulking agents, sacral nerve stimulation, and SECCA procedure have modest efficacy but safe and less invasive. Surgery has equivocal efficacy but there are promising new techniques including dynamic graciloplasty, artificial bowel sphincter, and magnetic anal sphincter. Despite being challenging, there are no short of alternatives in our toolbox for the management of constipation and FI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeong Yeh Lee
- School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia , Kota Bharu , Malaysia ; Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Georgia Regents University , Augusta, GA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bharucha AE, Rao SSC. An update on anorectal disorders for gastroenterologists. Gastroenterology 2014; 146:37-45.e2. [PMID: 24211860 PMCID: PMC3913170 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.10.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2013] [Revised: 10/21/2013] [Accepted: 10/22/2013] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Gastroenterologists frequently encounter pelvic floor disorders, which affect 10% to 15% of the population. The anorectum is a complex organ that collaborates with the pelvic floor muscles to preserve fecal continence and enable defecation. A careful clinical assessment is critical for the diagnosis and management of defecatory disorders and fecal incontinence. Newer diagnostic tools (eg, high-resolution manometry and magnetic resonance defecography) provide a refined understanding of anorectal dysfunctions and identify phenotypes in defecatory disorders and fecal incontinence. Conservative approaches, including biofeedback therapy, are the mainstay for managing these disorders; new minimally invasive approaches may benefit a subset of patients with fecal incontinence, but more controlled studies are needed. This mini-review highlights advances, current concepts, and controversies in the area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adil E Bharucha
- Clinical Enteric Neuroscience Translational and Epidemiological Research Program, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Satish S C Rao
- Section of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, Georgia.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Paris G, Chastan N, Gourcerol G, Verin E, Menard JF, Michot F, Weber J, Leroi AM. Evoked pressure curves from the external anal sphincter following transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy volunteers and patients with faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15:e732-40. [PMID: 23953333 DOI: 10.1111/codi.12386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2013] [Accepted: 06/28/2013] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM The hypothesis was tested that evoked pressure curves (EPCs) after transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) would provide additional neuropathophysiological information on the descending pathways to the external anal sphincter (EAS) in patients with faecal incontinence (FI). METHOD Twenty-five healthy subjects and 69 patients with FI were investigated. TMS was applied to the vertex, and EPCs were recorded with a probe placed through the EAS. TMS was performed with the EAS at rest and during contraction (facilitated responses). At least three responses were recorded for each modality. Clinical data and anorectal manometric, electrophysiological perineal and transanal ultrasound recordings were compared with respect to the EPC results. RESULTS There was no statistically significant difference between the EPCs of healthy subjects and FI patients. Twenty-three per cent of the FI patients had abnormal EPC latencies, with significantly lower voluntary contraction amplitudes (P = 0.03) and significantly higher rectal sensation (P = 0.04) than the other group. We found no significant difference between FI patients with and without abnormal EPC latencies in terms of clinical characteristics and electrophysiological and endoanal ultrasound parameters. There was no difference in the identified causes of the FI between the two groups. CONCLUSION As abnormal EPC latencies were found in 23% of FI patients with no known central neurological disease, abnormal EPC latencies might reveal undetected lesions of descending pathways in patients with FI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Paris
- INSERM U1073, CIC Rouen University Hospital, F-76031, Rouen, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rectal hyposensitivity for non-noxious stimuli, postprandial hypersensitivity and its correlation with symptoms in complete spinal cord injury with neurogenic bowel dysfunction. Spinal Cord 2012; 51:94-8. [PMID: 22929208 DOI: 10.1038/sc.2012.98] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Prospective clinical study. OBJECTIVES To assess fasting and postprandial (PP) perception of rectal distension and its correlation with symptoms in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) and neurogenic bowel dysfunction compared to ten healthy subjects (HS). SETTING Experimental Medicine and Motility Unit, Mexico General Hospital and National Institute of Rehabilitation. METHODS Twenty patients with complete SCI at cervical, thoracic and lumbar levels [American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) A] were studied. Rectal sensitivity was evaluated with a barostat. RESULTS In SCI patients, while lower the rectal tone more time was used for defecate (R=0.50, P=0.048) and more PP episodes of fecal incontinence occur (R=0.54, P=0.030). The thresholds for non-noxious stimuli of first (23.6 mmHg, CI 19.5-27.7) vs 14.0 (CI 10.9-17.1), P=0.004; gas (27.9 mmHg, CI 19.9-35.8) vs 17.9 mmHg (CI 14.25-21.69), P=0.02 and urge-to-defecate sensation (33.2 mmHg, CI 27.5-38.8) vs 22.4 mmHg (CI 17.9-26.9), P=0.01 were reported by SCI patients at higher pressure than HS, respectively. SCI patients reported PP pain sensation at a lower pressure than controls (27.8 mmHg, CI 21.5-34.2 vs 36.5 mmHg, CI 31.8-41.2), P=0.04. CONCLUSION SCI patients preserve rectal sensation, present rectal hyposensitivity for non-noxious stimuli and PP hypersensitivity. Lower rectal tone was related to the time used for defecate and with fecal incontinence. The results suggest that an intact neural transmission between the spinal cord and higher centres is indispensable for noxious stimulus, but not for non-noxious stimuli. Also, barostat sensitivity studies can complement ASIA criteria to verify a complete injury.
Collapse
|
26
|
Awad RA. Neurogenic bowel dysfunction in patients with spinal cord injury, myelomeningocele, multiple sclerosis and Parkinson’s disease. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17:5035-48. [PMID: 22171138 PMCID: PMC3235587 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i46.5035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2011] [Revised: 06/20/2011] [Accepted: 06/27/2011] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Exciting new features have been described concerning neurogenic bowel dysfunction, including interactions between the central nervous system, the enteric nervous system, axonal injury, neuronal loss, neurotransmission of noxious and non-noxious stimuli, and the fields of gastroenterology and neurology. Patients with spinal cord injury, myelomeningocele, multiple sclerosis and Parkinson’s disease present with serious upper and lower bowel dysfunctions characterized by constipation, incontinence, gastrointestinal motor dysfunction and altered visceral sensitivity. Spinal cord injury is associated with severe autonomic dysfunction, and bowel dysfunction is a major physical and psychological burden for these patients. An adult myelomeningocele patient commonly has multiple problems reflecting the multisystemic nature of the disease. Multiple sclerosis is a neurodegenerative disorder in which axonal injury, neuronal loss, and atrophy of the central nervous system can lead to permanent neurological damage and clinical disability. Parkinson's disease is a multisystem disorder involving dopaminergic, noradrenergic, serotoninergic and cholinergic systems, characterized by motor and non-motor symptoms. Parkinson's disease affects several neuronal structures outside the substantia nigra, among which is the enteric nervous system. Recent reports have shown that the lesions in the enteric nervous system occur in very early stages of the disease, even before the involvement of the central nervous system. This has led to the postulation that the enteric nervous system could be critical in the pathophysiology of Parkinson's disease, as it could represent the point of entry for a putative environmental factor to initiate the pathological process. This review covers the data related to the etiology, epidemiology, clinical expression, pathophysiology, genetic aspects, gastrointestinal motor dysfunction, visceral sensitivity, management, prevention and prognosis of neurogenic bowel dysfunction patients with these neurological diseases. Embryological, morphological and experimental studies on animal models and humans are also taken into account.
Collapse
|