Process control of filtered red blood cells: which counting method?

Comparison of Flow Cytometric Methods for the Enumeration of Residual Leucocytes in Leucoreduced Blood Products: A Multicenter Study

The BD FACSVia™ System features novel designs in hardware, software, and instrument QC. We compared the performance of the BD FACSVia System using the BD Leucocount™ kit with the BD FACSCalibur™ flow cytometer. Leucoreduced platelet (PLT, n = 252) and red blood cell (RBC, n = 278) specimens were enrolled at four sites. Each specimen was stained in four tubes using the BD Leucocount kit reagents and acquired on the two systems. BD Leucocount Control cells (high and low) were used to evaluate the inter-site reproducibility on the BD FACSVia System at three sites over 20 days. Deming regression and Bland-Altman analysis were performed to determine the WBC absolute counts on the BD FACSVia System vs. the BD FACSCalibur system. Assay accuracy for the range of 0-350 WBCs/µl was adequate. For samples with <25 WBCs/µl, the bias with 95% limits of agreement was 0.136 (-1.897 to 2.169) WBC/µl for PLTs (n = 184) and 0.170 (-2.025 to 2.365) WBC/µl for RBCs (n = 193). For inter-site reproducibility, the CV% was 6.46% (upper 95% CI 7.16%) for the PLT high control and 9.49% (10.52%) for the PLT low control. The CV% was 7.51% (8.32%) for the RBC high control and 10.76% (11.92%) for the RBC low control. The BD FACSVia System reported equivalent results of WBC absolute counts for leucoreduced PLT and RBC samples compared to the BD FACSCalibur system. The inter-laboratory reproducibility of the BD FACSVia System met study specifications. © 2018 The Authors. Cytometry Part A Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of ISAC.

Evaluation of droplet digital PCR for quantification of residual leucocytes in red blood cell concentrates

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Enumeration of residual white blood cells in leucoreduced blood components is essential part of quality control. Digital PCR has substantially facilitated quantitative PCR and was thus evaluated for measurements of leucocytes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Target for quantification of leucocytes by digital droplet PCR was the blood group gene RHCE. The SPEF1 gene was added as internal control for the entire assay starting with automated DNA extraction. The sensitivity of the method was determined by serial dilutions of standard samples. Quality control samples were analysed within 24 h, 7 days and 6 months after collection. Routine samples from leucodepleted red blood cell concentrates (n = 150) were evaluated in parallel by flow-cytometry (LeucoCount) and by digital PCR.

RESULTS

Digital PCR reliably detected at least 0·4 leucocytes per assay. The mean difference between PCR and flow-cytometric results from 150 units was -0·01 (±1·0). DNA samples were stable for up to at least six months. PCR measurement of leucocytes in samples from plasma and platelet concentrates also provided valid results in a pilot study.

CONCLUSION

Droplet digital PCR to enumerate leucocytes offers an alternative for quality control of leucoreduced blood products. Sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility are comparable to flow-cytometry. The option to collect samples over an extended period of time and the automatization introduce attractive features for routine quality control.

Flow cytometric determination of residual white blood cell levels in preserved samples from leukoreduced blood products

BACKGROUND

In preparation for a proposed consolidated testing service, Canadian Blood Services undertook the evaluation of a commercial test kit for the enumeration by flow cytometry of residual white blood cells (rWBCs) present in preserved samples recovered from leukoreduced (LR) blood and platelet products.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The stability of preserved WBCs, the equivalency of WBCs used for spiking, test method precision, specificity, reliability, accuracy, and sensitivity were investigated. For comparative purposes, WBC counts were also determined by Nageotte as well as by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

WBCs were stable up to 4 weeks at room temperature for all components by either method. Within methods, no differences were observed due to the source of WBC used for spiking purposes. By either method, test precision was acceptable (<20% coefficient of variation) and of similar reliability at a target value of 10 +/- 5 WBCs per microL. The flow cytometric method was shown to be more specific and accurate than the Nageotte method. Sensitivity by either method was 0.1 WBCs per microL. On average, Nageotte counts were lower than those observed by flow cytometry.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that WBCs in WBC stabilizing solution-treated samples from LR blood components were stabilized up to 4 weeks at room temperature and that rWBC determinations made with a WBC enumeration kit by flow cytometry have the required precision, specificity, reliability, and accuracy in the relevant test range. This validated WBC stabilization and flow cytometric counting method is considered acceptable as part of a quality control program for leukoreduced blood products.

Apoptosis in leucodepleted packed red blood cells

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Packed red blood cells (pRBCs) contain apoptotic white cells. We studied apoptotic cells in pRBCs after filtration and at various time-points during storage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To maintain the same subset of cells, seven pRBC units were pooled in a single bag and divided equally into seven aliquots. Two series of five experiments were performed: in the first we utilized the Biofil R01 Max filter, and in the second the Pall BPF4 filter was used. One aliquot was immediately leucodepleted while the others were stored at 4 degrees C and filtered on days 3, 7, 10, 14, 21 and 42 of storage. The postfiltration leucocyte counts and apoptotic evaluations were performed by using the Nageotte chamber and flow cytometry.

RESULTS

The absolute number of residual leucocytes was always less than 0.5 x 106 in each experiment. Nageotte chamber counts showed a greater number of white blood cells than flow cytometry during the 42 days of storage. On day 0, the percentage of apoptotic cells in non-leucodepleted pRBCs was 1.1 +/- 0.4 and 1.2 +/- 0.4, while in filtered pRBCs it was high from day 0, at 53.5 +/- 16.3 and 52 +/- 18.5, respectively, with Biofil and Pall filters. On day 10 of storage, apoptotic cells reached a percentage of 42.5 +/- 15.8 and 41.6 +/- 18.6 in non-leucodepleted pRBCs, while in filtered units an average value of approximately 90% was found with both filters.

CONCLUSIONS

The percentage of apoptotic cells was higher in leucodepleted than in non-leucodepleted pRBCs. After filtration, the degree of apoptosis was already high on day 0, and reached a mean of approximately 90% by day 10. The difference in residual WBC counts between the Nageotte chamber and flow cytometry could be related to the presence of a high percentage of apoptotic cells in filtered blood components, and to the method used to distinguish viable from apoptotic cells.

The United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Scheme gating and standardization strategy for use in residual WBC counting of WBC-reduced blood components

BACKGROUND

Major causes of interlaboratory variation in low-level WBC counting are the gating strategies and staining methods employed. To overcome these limitations, a stable low-level WBC control preparation (termed daily run control [DRC]) was developed that when coupled with a new gating strategy will enable international standardization.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Both a whole blood preparation (stability of more than 12 months; target WBC count of 20 cells/microL with defined fluorescence values) and a new gating strategy were developed and used with a staining kit (LeucoCOUNT [Becton Dickinson BioSciences] providing the basis for standardization). These were then combined and used to crosscalibrate seven different flow cytometers. After standardization with the DRC, comparative studies were undertaken with fresh samples with a WBC range of <1 to 60 cells per microL.

RESULTS

The developed gating strategy enabled the DRC WBCs to be positioned to within four channels of the expected target fluorescence 1 value (2.3% variation) and within three channels of the target fluorescence 2 value (0.7% variation) on all evaluated instruments. Subsequent analysis of any sample meant that the WBCs always occupied the same "sample space," irrespective of flow cytometer platform and without the need for repositioning of the analysis region and/or gate.

CONCLUSION

The cross calibration and standardization of flow cytometers used for low-level WBC counting (irrespective of platform) are attainable with this United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Scheme strategy. Its adoption should reduce interlaboratory CVs and provide a practical approach for the rapid identification of operator and machine problems.

Low level leucocyte counting: a critical variable in the validation of leucodepleted blood transfusion components as highlighted by an external quality assessment study

Leucocyte counts of < 5 x 106 per blood transfusion product are currently recommended in the UK in order to reduce transfusion-related infections and febrile reactions. Routine leucocyte depletion, however, requires the development of reliable internal and external quality assurance (EQA) programmes. We report preliminary findings from the UK NEQAS for Low-Level Leucocyte Counting from 18 UK Transfusion Centres over a four month period. Data analysis showed that the IMAGN 2000 had the lowest CVs (range 7.5-36%, mean 16.7) for samples with counts of 5-30 cells/microl when compared to the flow cytometric (range 13.8-88%, mean 29.5) and Nageotte methods (range 20.6-117%, mean 61.8). In addition, laboratories using commercial nuclear stains (LeucoCOUNTTM) had consistently lower CVs than those using 'in-house' propidium iodide staining methods. Important differences in flow cytometric gating strategies were also identified. This study highlights the current variability in low level leucocyte counting, especially within the critical range of 5-30 cells/microl (equating to < 5 x 106/l). The acceptance of consensus protocols, including gating strategies and nuclear staining techniques, is required to reduce the observed interlaboratory variation. Finally, we demonstrate that stabilized blood preparations can be successfully used to provide a national/international low-level leucocyte EQA scheme.