[The role of the maxillary incisors in the development of the base of the nose. Applications in dento-facial orthopedics]

[Obstructive sleep disordered breathing and orthodontics: primum non nocere]

Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome is a widespread and under-diagnosed condition, making it a major public health and safety issue. The objective of this article was to clarify some of the evidence-based elements of therapeutic decision-making and the information provided to the patient and family on the benefit-cost-security ratio of several of his therapeutic options. Published data on the effectiveness of oral appliances and functional orthopaedic appliances for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children, the durability of their effects, the therapeutic possibilities of maxillary or bimaxillary expansion, and the interrelationships between permanent teeth extractions and obstructive sleep disordered breathing, were researched and analyzed. Based on available evidence, in growing patients with Class II malocclusion, treatment with functional orthopedic devices can increase the volume of the pharyngeal airway and thus hopefully reduce the risk of developing OSA. An improvement in the apnea-hypopnea index and lower oxygen saturation was observed in children treated with rapid maxillary expansion. Permanent teeth extractions prescribed for the treatment of teeth crowding in an orthodontic age patient do not result in any significant change in the upper airway. The role of the orthodontist in the multidisciplinary team in the screening and management of Obstructive Sleep Disordered Breathing (OSDB) is essential. By combining clinical experience with published data on various therapeutic approaches, the orthodontist helps the patient to benefit from better adapted care and a more sustainable outcome, while taking into account his or her preferences.

[Primary treatment of cleft lip and palate. Its fundamental principles]

If the multiplicity of functional protocols of cleft lip and palate treatment has been bewildering, it is now a source of learning. The lessons we can draw from them assist us to choose the best age for the primary surgery and a chronology that prevents the palate from the worst scaring. Eventually, with 18 years of follow-up, the best functional achievement comes unexpectedly from an ambitious primary rhinoplasty that had till now been condemned. Not only do the patients have good appearance and social integration, but the nasal mode of breathing established at the time of the primary surgery favors a good facial growth without any compromise. Reciprocally, all the interacting functions benefit from a nasal ventilation.

[Cleft rhinoplasty, from primary to secondary surgery]

Despite fifty years of statistics, congresses, publications, the cleft nose remains an enigma to the great majority of cleft specialists. Most of the published papers give recipes to camouflage the cleft deformity, very few are concerned by the functional anatomy and its relation with facial growth. The complexity of the matter, the results frequently disappointing, the lack of awareness of the necessity of early nasal breathing, and the academic condemnation of any imperfect attempt to correct the nose at the time of the first operation have led to resignation. For the last forty years, we have been involved in a careful and obstinate research about the early correction of the cleft nose deformity. We wish to present our conclusions in this chapter with at least 17 years of follow-up. They are as following: in cleft patients the nasal cartilages are only deformed. We can achieve sub periosteal and sub perichondrial dissections by 6 months of age without being harmful for facial and nasal growth. Repositioning accurately the nasal structures is enough if we are able to control the healing process and prevent endonasal wound contraction. We have not to do any compromise and favor one function with regard to the others, nasal ventilation being the most important for a good facial growth. In a word, nasal pediatric surgery is necessary at the time of the first operation from 6 months of age and should be carried on with a double demand, aesthetic and functional. To achieve this goal, we must have a sound knowledge of the cleft nose deformity, of the adequate surgical techniques and of the logic chronology to reach the best result. The nose repair cannot be limited to the nasal cartilages. The whole nasal structure is concerned especially its bony framework, the width of which at the level of the piriform orifice and the nasal floor depends on the outcomes of any surgical step that it would relate to the lip, palate or alveolar closure. Interaction of all these factors calls for an appropriate answer in adequation with the diagnosis of the deformity and a coherent answer as we know that any local action may induce an unfavorable chain reaction and should integrate a global and logic project. After the primary surgery, additional correction for aesthetic or functional purpose as well, may be useful during the period of growth. For cleft teenagers or adults, the rhinoplasty can simply be indicated for harmonization after a good primary nasal correction and optimal facial growth. On the contrary, the rhinoplasty may be more or less a complex operation for the usual and severe deformities. In the last case, the diagnosis must take into account all the residual deformities, even the labial and alveolar ones, and the treatment plan integrate all the principles and techniques of the primary surgery. What has not been done at the time of the primary surgery, should be done secondarily: all the structures are present, only deformed and embedded in scarred tissues. Primary or secondary cleft rhinoplasty must be undertaken by surgeons accustomed to cleft patients, but also trained in the other fields of nasal surgery, aesthetic and reconstructive.

[A functional approach in the primary treatment of labial-alveolar-velopalatine clefts for a minimum of sequels]

Is the poor potential of growth an ineluctable consequence of mesodermal deficiency? Should we agree with the idea that all protocols are equivalent? Actually, these opinions reflect the empiricism of previous generations. We must now become rational and develop a project without compromise to achieve good functions at primary surgery. 'The normal structures are present on either side of the cleft, only modified by the fact of the cleft...' Victor Veau's hypothesis is the conclusion of rigorous anatomical and embryological research. Our current knowledge of the pathological anatomy allows for a better restoration of the normal anatomy. Anatomy is nothing if it is not functional. Every thing should be done to control the healing process to allow the best expression and interaction of the various functions, especially for those concerning nasal ventilation and masticatory efficiency. To correct the deformity, the cleft surgeon must perform a wide subperiosteal and subperichondrial elevation and must learn the skills of this accurate work to preserve the integrity of very fragile structures. The primary treatment must take into account a rational and uncompromising selection of the age of the first operation, of the successive procedures, and their chronology to benefit from the growth spurt of the maxilla, and to avoid the worse scars resulting from secondary epithelialization. Finally, if nasal breathing is the most important function concerning facial growth, it is essential to restore this normal function at the time of the first operation. The oral breathing pattern set at the time of the first operation leaves a cortical imprint that is very difficult to erase, even after clearing the nasal airways. The results of the functional approach we have used in the last decade are particularly consistent and very convincing. In this ambitious and demanding program, the patient comes first; we decrease the burden for him and his family, and give them the benefit of a good social life before school age.