1
|
Jiang Q, Hua H. Fertility in young-onset colorectal patients with cancer: a review. Oncologist 2024:oyae141. [PMID: 38906705 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Although the overall incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer have declined, diagnosed cases of young-onset colorectal cancer have increased significantly. Concerns about future fertility are second only to concerns about survival and may significantly affect the quality of life of young cancer survivors. Fertility preservation is an important issue in young-onset colorectal patients with cancer undergoing oncotherapy. Here, we discussed the effects of different treatments on fertility, common options for fertility preservation, factors affecting fertility preservation and improvement measures, and the relationship between fertility and pregnancy outcomes in young-onset colorectal patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiuping Jiang
- Department of Nursing, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of MedicineHangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongmei Hua
- Department of Nursing, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of MedicineHangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Helgadottir H, Matikas A, Fernebro J, Frödin JE, Ekman S, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA. Fertility and reproductive concerns related to the new generation of cancer drugs and the clinical implication for young individuals undergoing treatments for solid tumors. Eur J Cancer 2024; 202:114010. [PMID: 38520926 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Revised: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
The treatment landscape of solid tumors has changed markedly in the last years. Molecularly targeted treatments and immunotherapies have been implemented and have, in many cancers, lowered the risk of relapse and prolonged survival. Patients with tumors harboring specific targetable molecular alterations or mutations are often of a younger age, and hence future fertility and family building can be important concerns in this group. However, there are great uncertainties regarding the effect of the new drugs on reproductive functions, including fertility, pregnancy and lactation and how young patients with cancers, both women and men should be advised. The goal with this review is to gather the current knowledge regarding oncofertility and the different novel therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, small molecules and monoclonal antibody targeted therapies. The specific circumstances and reproductive concerns in different patient groups where novel treatments have been broadly introduced are also discussed, including those with melanoma, lung, breast, colorectal and gynecological cancers. It is clear, that more awareness is needed regarding potential drug toxicity on reproductive tissues, and it is of essence that individuals are informed based on current expertise and on available fertility preservation methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hildur Helgadottir
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden; Skin Cancer Centrum, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Alexios Matikas
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden; Breast Center, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Josefin Fernebro
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden; Division of Gynecological Cancer, Department of Pelvic Cancer, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jan-Erik Frödin
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden; Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Department of Upper abdomen, Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden
| | - Simon Ekman
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden; Thoracic Oncology Center, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kenny A Rodriguez-Wallberg
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Reproduction Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Davidson TM, Hieken TJ, Glasgow AE, Habermann EB, Yan Y. Pregnancy-associated melanoma: characteristics and outcomes from 2002 to 2020. Melanoma Res 2024; 34:175-181. [PMID: 38265469 PMCID: PMC10906198 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
Melanoma diagnosed within 1 year of pregnancy is defined as pregnancy-associated melanoma (PAM). No robust data on how pregnancy influences melanoma nor guidelines for PAM management exist. With IRB approval, female patients with a pathology-confirmed melanoma diagnosis within 1 year of pregnancy treated at our institution from 2000 to 2020 were identified. Controls from the cancer registry were matched 1 : 4 when available on decade of age, year of surgery (±5), and stage. We identified 83 PAM patients with median follow-up of 86 months. Mean age at diagnosis was 31 years. 80% AJCC V8 stage I, 2.4% stage II, 13% stage III, 4.8% stage IV. Mean Breslow thickness was 0.79 mm and 3.6% exhibited ulceration. The mean mitotic rate was 0.76/mm 2 . In terms of PAM management, 98.6% of ESD patients and 86.7% of LSD patients received standard-of-care therapy per NCCN guidelines for their disease stage. No clinically significant delays in treatment were noted. Time to treatment from diagnosis to systemic therapy for LSD patients was an average of 46 days (95% CI: 34-59 days). Comparing the 83 PAM patients to 309 controls matched on age, stage, and year of diagnosis, similar 5-year overall survival (97% vs. 97%, P = 0.95) or recurrence-free survival (96% vs. 96%, P = 0.86) was observed. The outcomes of PAM following SOC treatment at a highly specialized center for melanoma care were comparable to non-PAM when matched by clinical-pathologic features. Specialty center care is encouraged for women with PAM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tina J. Hieken
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic
| | - Amy E. Glasgow
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic
| | - Elizabeth B. Habermann
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic
- Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic
| | - Yiyi Yan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Venanzi FM, Bini M, Nuccio A, De Toma A, Lambertini M, Ogliari FR, Oresti S, Viganò MG, Brioschi E, Polignano M, Naldini MM, Riva S, Ferrara M, Fogale N, Damiano G, Russo V, Reni M, Veronesi G, Foggetti G, Conforti F, Bulotta A, Ferrara R. Sex dimorphism and cancer immunotherapy: May pregnancy solve the puzzle? Cancer Treat Rev 2023; 121:102648. [PMID: 37918169 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
In the immunoncology era, growing evidence has shown a clear sex dimorphism in antitumor immune response with a potential impact on outcomes upon immunecheckpoint blockade (ICI) in patients with cancer. Sex dimorphism could affect tumor microenvironment composition and systemic anticancer immunity; however, the modifications induced by sex are heterogeneous. From a clinical perspective, six metanalyses have explored the role of sex in cancer patients receiving ICI with conflicting results. Environmental and reproductive factors may further jeopardize the sex-related heterogeneity in anticancer immune response. In particular, pregnancy is characterized by orchestrated changes in the immune system, some of which could be long lasting. A persistence of memory T-cells with a potential fetal-antigen specificity has been reported both in human and mice, suggesting that a previous pregnancy may positively impact cancer development or response to ICI, in case of fetal-antigen sharing from tumor cells. On the other hand, a previous pregnancy may also be associated with a regulatory memory characterized by increased tolerance and anergy towards cancer-fetal common antigens. Finally, fetal-maternal microchimerism could represent an additional source of chronic exposure to fetal antigens and may have important immunological implications on cancer development and ICI activity. So far, the role of pregnancy dimorphism (nulliparous vs parous) in women and the impact of pregnancy-related variables remain largely underexplored in cancer patients. In this review, we summarize the evidence regarding sex and pregnancy dimorphism in the context of immune response and anticancer immunotherapy and advocate the importance of analyzing pregnancy variables on ICIs clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Maria Venanzi
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Bini
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Nuccio
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Clinical di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesca Rita Ogliari
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Oresti
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Viganò
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Brioschi
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Maggie Polignano
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Maria Naldini
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Riva
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Ferrara
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fogale
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Damiano
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Russo
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Reni
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Veronesi
- Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Division of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgia Foggetti
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Conforti
- Oncology Unit, Humanitas Gavazzeni, 24125 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Alessandra Bulotta
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Ferrara
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Loibl S, Azim HA, Bachelot T, Berveiller P, Bosch A, Cardonick E, Denkert C, Halaska MJ, Hoeltzenbein M, Johansson ALV, Maggen C, Markert UR, Peccatori F, Poortmans P, Saloustros E, Saura C, Schmid P, Stamatakis E, van den Heuvel-Eibrink M, van Gerwen M, Vandecaveye V, Pentheroudakis G, Curigliano G, Amant F. ESMO Expert Consensus Statements on the management of breast cancer during pregnancy (PrBC). Ann Oncol 2023; 34:849-866. [PMID: 37572987 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/14/2023] Open
Abstract
The management of breast cancer during pregnancy (PrBC) is a relatively rare indication and an area where no or little evidence is available since randomized controlled trials cannot be conducted. In general, advances related to breast cancer (BC) treatment outside pregnancy cannot always be translated to PrBC, because both the interests of the mother and of the unborn should be considered. Evidence remains limited and/or conflicting in some specific areas where the optimal approach remains controversial. In 2022, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) held a virtual consensus-building process on this topic to gain insights from a multidisciplinary group of experts and develop statements on controversial topics that cannot be adequately addressed in the current evidence-based ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline. The aim of this consensus-building process was to discuss controversial issues relating to the management of patients with PrBC. The virtual meeting included a multidisciplinary panel of 24 leading experts from 13 countries and was chaired by S. Loibl and F. Amant. All experts were allocated to one of four different working groups. Each working group covered a specific subject area with two chairs appointed: Planning, preparation and execution of the consensus process was conducted according to the ESMO standard operating procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Loibl
- GBG c/o GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg; Centre for Haematology and Oncology Bethanien, Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt; Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - H A Azim
- Breast Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
| | - T Bachelot
- Department of medical oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - P Berveiller
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Poissy-Saint Germain Hospital, Poissy; UMR 1198 - BREED, INRAE, Paris Saclay University, RHuMA, Montigny-Le-Bretonneux, France
| | - A Bosch
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund; Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - E Cardonick
- Cooper Medical School at Rowan University, Camden, USA
| | - C Denkert
- Philipps-University Marburg and Marburg University Hospital (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - M J Halaska
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and Universital Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - M Hoeltzenbein
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Embryotox Center of Clinical Teratology and Drug Safety in Pregnancy, Berlin, Germany
| | - A L V Johansson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - C Maggen
- Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - U R Markert
- Placenta Lab, Department of Obstetrics, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - F Peccatori
- Gynecologic Oncology Department, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - P Poortmans
- Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp; University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - E Saloustros
- Department of Oncology, University General Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece
| | - C Saura
- Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Schmid
- Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | - E Stamatakis
- Department of Anesthesiology, 'Alexandra' General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - M van Gerwen
- Gynecologic Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychosocial Care, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam; Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - V Vandecaveye
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - G Pentheroudakis
- European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - G Curigliano
- Division of Early Drug Development, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - F Amant
- Gynecologic Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; Division Gynaecologic Oncology, UZ Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pavlick AC, Ariyan CE, Buchbinder EI, Davar D, Gibney GT, Hamid O, Hieken TJ, Izar B, Johnson DB, Kulkarni RP, Luke JJ, Mitchell TC, Mooradian MJ, Rubin KM, Salama AK, Shirai K, Taube JM, Tawbi HA, Tolley JK, Valdueza C, Weiss SA, Wong MK, Sullivan RJ. Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of melanoma, version 3.0. J Immunother Cancer 2023; 11:e006947. [PMID: 37852736 PMCID: PMC10603365 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-006947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Since the first approval for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of cutaneous melanoma more than a decade ago, immunotherapy has completely transformed the treatment landscape of this chemotherapy-resistant disease. Combination regimens including ICIs directed against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) with anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) agents or, more recently, anti-lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) agents, have gained regulatory approvals for the treatment of metastatic cutaneous melanoma, with long-term follow-up data suggesting the possibility of cure for some patients with advanced disease. In the resectable setting, adjuvant ICIs prolong recurrence-free survival, and neoadjuvant strategies are an active area of investigation. Other immunotherapy strategies, such as oncolytic virotherapy for injectable cutaneous melanoma and bispecific T-cell engager therapy for HLA-A*02:01 genotype-positive uveal melanoma, are also available to patients. Despite the remarkable efficacy of these regimens for many patients with cutaneous melanoma, traditional immunotherapy biomarkers (ie, programmed death-ligand 1 expression, tumor mutational burden, T-cell infiltrate and/or microsatellite stability) have failed to reliably predict response. Furthermore, ICIs are associated with unique toxicity profiles, particularly for the highly active combination of anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 agents. The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a panel of experts to develop this clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of melanoma, including rare subtypes of the disease (eg, uveal, mucosal), with the goal of improving patient care by providing guidance to the oncology community. Drawing from published data and clinical experience, the Expert Panel developed evidence- and consensus-based recommendations for healthcare professionals using immunotherapy to treat melanoma, with topics including therapy selection in the advanced and perioperative settings, intratumoral immunotherapy, when to use immunotherapy for patients with BRAFV600-mutated disease, management of patients with brain metastases, evaluation of treatment response, special patient populations, patient education, quality of life, and survivorship, among others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Charlotte E Ariyan
- Department of Surgery Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Diwakar Davar
- Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburg Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Geoffrey T Gibney
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Omid Hamid
- The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, A Cedars-Sinai Affiliate, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Tina J Hieken
- Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Benjamin Izar
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Douglas B Johnson
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Rajan P Kulkarni
- Departments of Dermatology, Oncological Sciences, Biomedical Engineering, and Center for Cancer Early Detection Advanced Research, Knight Cancer Institute, OHSU, Portland, Oregon, USA
- Operative Care Division, VA Portland Health Care System (VAPORHCS), Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Jason J Luke
- Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Tara C Mitchell
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Meghan J Mooradian
- Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Krista M Rubin
- Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - April Ks Salama
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, Carolina, USA
| | - Keisuke Shirai
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Janis M Taube
- Department of Dermatology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Hussein A Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - J Keith Tolley
- Patient Advocate, Melanoma Research Alliance, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Caressa Valdueza
- Cutaneous Oncology Program, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sarah A Weiss
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Michael K Wong
- Patient Advocate, Melanoma Research Alliance, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Ryan J Sullivan
- Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Baas IO, Westermann AM, You B, Bolze PA, Seckl M, Ghorani E. Immunotherapy for Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A New Paradigm. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2023; 89:230-238. [PMID: 37703867 PMCID: PMC11152029 DOI: 10.1159/000533972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint immunotherapy (CPI) targeting programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/ligand (PD-L1) has been shown to be an effective treatment for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). This includes those with multidrug resistance, ultra-high-risk disease, and epithelioid trophoblastic tumour/placental site trophoblastic tumour subtypes that are inherently chemotherapy resistant, but there is also emerging evidence in low-risk disease. OBJECTIVES We set out to generate an overview of the current data supporting the use of CPI for GTN in both high-risk and low-risk disease and to consider future research goals and directions in order to implement CPI in current treatment guidelines. METHODS We identified and reviewed the published data on the use of CPI agents in GTN. OUTCOME 133 patients were identified who had been treated with CPI for GTN with pembrolizumab (23), avelumab (22), camrelizumab (57), toripalimab (15), or other anti-PD-1 agents (16), of whom 118 had high-risk diseases, relapse or multi-drug resistant disease, and 15 low-risk diseases. Overall 85 patients achieved complete remission, 77 (of 118) with high-risk disease, and 8 (of 15) with low-risk disease. 1 patient with complete remission in the high-risk group developed a relapse 22 months after anti-PD-1 treatment had been stopped. Treatment was generally well tolerated across studies. CONCLUSIONS AND OUTLOOK The majority of high-risk patients (77/118) treated with CPI are cured and this is particularly relevant amongst those with chemotherapy resistant disease who otherwise have very limited treatment options. Priorities for future research include determining whether these agents have a role earlier in the disease course, the utility of combination with chemotherapy, and effects on future fertility. Treatment availability remains a concern due to the high price of these agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inge O Baas
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands,
| | - Anneke M Westermann
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Benoit You
- Université Lyon 1, Hospices Civils De Lyon, Centre Français De Référence Des Maladies Trophoblastiques, Hôpital Lyon Sud, CITOHL, EA 3738 CICLY, Univ Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Pierre-Adrien Bolze
- Université Lyon 1, Hospices Civils De Lyon, Centre Français De Référence Des Maladies Trophoblastiques, Hôpital Lyon Sud, CITOHL, EA 3738 CICLY, Univ Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Michael Seckl
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Centre, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ehsan Ghorani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Centre, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sun Q, Hong Z, Zhang C, Wang L, Han Z, Ma D. Immune checkpoint therapy for solid tumours: clinical dilemmas and future trends. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2023; 8:320. [PMID: 37635168 PMCID: PMC10460796 DOI: 10.1038/s41392-023-01522-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 78.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICBs), in addition to targeting CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1, novel targeting LAG-3 drugs have also been approved in clinical application. With the widespread use of the drug, we must deeply analyze the dilemma of the agents and seek a breakthrough in the treatment prospect. Over the past decades, these agents have demonstrated dramatic efficacy, especially in patients with melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nonetheless, in the field of a broad concept of solid tumours, non-specific indications, inseparable immune response and side effects, unconfirmed progressive disease, and complex regulatory networks of immune resistance are four barriers that limit its widespread application. Fortunately, the successful clinical trials of novel ICB agents and combination therapies, the advent of the era of oncolytic virus gene editing, and the breakthrough of the technical barriers of mRNA vaccines and nano-delivery systems have made remarkable breakthroughs currently. In this review, we enumerate the mechanisms of each immune checkpoint targets, associations between ICB with tumour mutation burden, key immune regulatory or resistance signalling pathways, the specific clinical evidence of the efficacy of classical targets and new targets among different tumour types and put forward dialectical thoughts on drug safety. Finally, we discuss the importance of accurate triage of ICB based on recent advances in predictive biomarkers and diagnostic testing techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Sun
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China
- Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China
| | - Zhenya Hong
- Department of Hematology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China
| | - Cong Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China
- Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China
| | - Liangliang Wang
- Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China
| | - Zhiqiang Han
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China.
- Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China.
| | - Ding Ma
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China.
- Cancer Biology Research Center (Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education), Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang R, Xiong K, Wang Z, Wu D, Hu B, Ruan J, Sun C, Ma D, Li L, Liao S. Immunodiagnosis - the promise of personalized immunotherapy. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1216901. [PMID: 37520576 PMCID: PMC10372420 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1216901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapy showed remarkable efficacy in several cancer types. However, the majority of patients do not benefit from immunotherapy. Evaluating tumor heterogeneity and immune status before treatment is key to identifying patients that are more likely to respond to immunotherapy. Demographic characteristics (such as sex, age, and race), immune status, and specific biomarkers all contribute to response to immunotherapy. A comprehensive immunodiagnostic model integrating all these three dimensions by artificial intelligence would provide valuable information for predicting treatment response. Here, we coined the term "immunodiagnosis" to describe the blueprint of the immunodiagnostic model. We illustrated the features that should be included in immunodiagnostic model and the strategy of constructing the immunodiagnostic model. Lastly, we discussed the incorporation of this immunodiagnosis model in clinical practice in hopes of improving the prognosis of tumor immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renjie Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Kairong Xiong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhimin Wang
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Di Wu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Bai Hu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jinghan Ruan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Chaoyang Sun
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Ding Ma
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Li Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Shujie Liao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cancer Biology Research Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Romano A, Mastrangelo S, Attina G, Maurizi P, Ruggiero A. Pregnancy-associated Cancer and Chemotherapy during Pregnancy. BIOMEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGY JOURNAL 2023; 16:705-714. [DOI: 10.13005/bpj/2652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
The diagnosis of pregnancy-associated cancer, although rare, is a condition of great human and social significance and difficult clinical management. A pregnancy-associated neoplasm is defined as a cancer diagnosis made during pregnancy or within 12 months after delivery/abortion. The most common cancers in pregnancy occur most frequently in women of reproductive age with an incidence overall like that observed in non-pregnant women of the same age. This incidence is likely to increase in view of both the expected increase in certain malignancies among young women (particularly breast cancer and melanoma) and the increasing frequency of pregnancies undertaken later in life (fourth and fifth decades of life) that is characterizing modern society. Chemotherapy is generally contraindicated before 12 weeks of pregnancy due to the increased risk of congenital anomalies while exposure in the second and third trimester of pregnancy to chemotherapy has been associated with more growth restriction and preterm delivery. Clinical decisions about the optimal management should consider maternal and fetal characteristics with the involvement of a multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Romano
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Universita’ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Mastrangelo
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Universita’ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgio Attina
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Universita’ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Palma Maurizi
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Universita’ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Ruggiero
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Universita’ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pirosa MC, Peccatori FA. Lymphomas in pregnancy. Hematol Oncol 2023; 41 Suppl 1:70-74. [PMID: 37294956 DOI: 10.1002/hon.3150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Lymphoma in pregnancy is an uncommon occurrence. This diagnosis is challenging, and a multidisciplinary team of specialists in obstetrics, anesthesiology, neonatology, hematology psychology should participate in the management of this condition. The choice of treatment regimen depends on the histotype and the gestational age. In Hodgkin lymphoma, ABVD is safe if administered after the thirteenth week of pregnancy. In indolent non-Hodgkin Lymphomas (NHL) a watchful waiting approach is reasonable; in case of aggressive NHLs, if the diagnosis occurs in the first gestational weeks, a termination of the pregnancy might be considered or if it occurs after the thirteenth week of pregnancy, a standard R-CHOP regimen is safe. Regarding new anti-lymphoma drugs, available data on the potential fetotoxicity of these agents are limited. Data collection regarding the use of new drugs in pregnant patients is mandatory in order to learn more about their safety and facilitating clinical decision making in this setting of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Cristina Pirosa
- Clinic of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biomedical Science, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Oprean CM, Ciocoiu AD, Segarceanu NA, Moldoveanu D, Stan A, Hoinoiu T, Chiorean-Cojocaru I, Grujic D, Stefanut A, Pit D, Dema A. Pregnancy in a Young Patient with Metastatic HER2-Positive Breast Cancer-Between Fear of Recurrence and Desire to Procreate. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:4833-4843. [PMID: 37232822 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30050364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most frequent neoplasm among women and the second leading cause of death by cancer. It is the most frequent cancer diagnosed during pregnancy. Pregnancy-associated breast cancer is defined as breast cancer that is diagnosed during pregnancy and/or in the postpartum period. Data about young women with metastatic HER2-positive cancer who desire a pregnancy are scarce. The medical attitude in these clinical situations is difficult and nonstandardized. We present the case of a 31-year-old premenopausal woman diagnosed in December 2016 with a stage IV Luminal HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (pT2 N0 M1 hep). The patient was initially treated by surgery in a conservative manner. Postoperatively, the presence of liver metastases was found by CT investigation. Consequently, line I treatment (docetaxel l75 mg/m² iv; trastuzumab 600 mg/5 mL sq) and ovarian drug suppression (Goserelin 3.6 mg sq at 28 days) was administered. After nine cycles of treatment, the patient's liver metastases had a partial response to the therapy. Despite having a favorable disease evolution and a strong desire to procreate, the patient vehemently refused to continue any oncological treatment. The psychiatric consult highlighted an anxious and depressive reaction for which individual and couple psychotherapy sessions were recommended. After 10 months from the interruption of the oncological treatment, the patient appeared with an evolving pregnancy of 15 weeks. An abdominal ultrasound revealed the presence of multiple liver metastases. Knowing all the possible effects, the patient consciously decided to postpone the proposed second-line treatment. In August 2018, the patient was admitted in the emergency department with malaise, diffuse abdominal pain and hepatic failure. Abdominal ultrasound found a 21-week-old pregnancy which had stopped in evolution, multiple liver metastases and ascites in large quantity. She was transferred to the ICU department where she perished just a few hours later. Conclusions/Discussion: From a psychological standpoint, the patient had an emotional hardship to make the transition from the status of a healthy person to the status of a sick person. Consequently, she entered a process of emotional protection of the positive cognitive distortion type, which favored the decision to abandon treatment and try to complete the pregnancy to the detriment of her own survival. The patient delayed the initiation of oncological treatment in pregnancy until it was too late. The consequence of this delay in treatment led to the death of the mother and fetus. A multidisciplinary team worked to provide this patient with the best medical care and psychological assistance throughout the course of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Marinela Oprean
- ANAPATMOL Research Center, 'Victor Babes' University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
- Department of Oncology, ONCOHELP Hospital Timisoara, Ciprian Porumbescu Street, No. 59, 300239 Timisoara, Romania
- Department of Oncology, ONCOMED Outpatient Unit, Ciprian Porumbescu Street, No. 59, 300239 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Andrei Dorin Ciocoiu
- Department of Oncology, ONCOHELP Hospital Timisoara, Ciprian Porumbescu Street, No. 59, 300239 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Nusa Alina Segarceanu
- Department of Oncology, ONCOHELP Hospital Timisoara, Ciprian Porumbescu Street, No. 59, 300239 Timisoara, Romania
- Department of Oncology, ONCOMED Outpatient Unit, Ciprian Porumbescu Street, No. 59, 300239 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Diana Moldoveanu
- Department of Oncology, ONCOHELP Hospital Timisoara, Ciprian Porumbescu Street, No. 59, 300239 Timisoara, Romania
- Department of Oncology, ONCOMED Outpatient Unit, Ciprian Porumbescu Street, No. 59, 300239 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Alexandra Stan
- Department of Oncology, City Clinical Emergency Hospital of Timisoara, Victor Babes Blvd. No. 22, 300595 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Teodora Hoinoiu
- Department of Clinical Practical Skills, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Sq. Nr. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
- Center for Advanced Research in Cardiovascular Pathology and Hemostaseology, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Ioana Chiorean-Cojocaru
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Daciana Grujic
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Eftimie Murgu Sq. Nr. 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Adelina Stefanut
- Department of Psichology & Sociology, West University, Timisora, Blvd. No. 4, Vasile Pârvan, 300223 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Daniel Pit
- Center for Advanced Research in Cardiovascular Pathology and Hemostaseology, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Alis Dema
- ANAPATMOL Research Center, 'Victor Babes' University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zambrana F, Barbancho C, Huelves M, García de Santiago B, Martín Y, Muñoz de Lengaria M, de Velasco G. Successful Pregnancy and Cancer Outcomes With Ipilimumab and Nivolumab for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Case Report and Review of the Literature. J Immunother 2023; 46:27-28. [PMID: 36327112 DOI: 10.1097/cji.0000000000000448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Pregnancy and cancer share CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 as some of the immunomodulatory pathways that reshape the immune system from a destructive response to a state of tolerance to the fetus and the tumor, respectively. Ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4 inhibitor) and nivolumab (anti-PD-1 inhibitor) are used in combination for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma, and their use could theoretically result in an immune response against the fetus. Furthermore, these immune checkpoint inhibitors are immunoglobulin G antibodies that transfer from the mother to the fetus and may cause a direct toxicity. We present the first report of a metastatic renal cell carcinoma patient in which ipilimumab and nivolumab were successfully used starting in her first trimester of pregnancy, with sufficient follow-up to show favorable outcomes for both the mother and the child. We describe our management of this challenging case and we review the available evidence, coming from Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology Studies and case reports of metastatic melanoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Yolanda Martín
- Infanta Sofía University Hospital
- Departments of Medical Oncology
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Pregnancy: Analysis of the VigiBase ® Spontaneous Reporting System. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010173. [PMID: 36612168 PMCID: PMC9818632 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
In pregnancy, immune checkpoint pathways are involved in the maintenance of fetomaternal immune tolerance. Preclinical studies have shown that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) increase the risk of fetal death. Despite the fact that using ICIs in pregnant women and women of childbearing potential is not recommended, some case reports of ICI exposure in pregnancy have been published showing favorable fetal outcomes. This study aimed to gain further insight into ICI safety in pregnancy by querying VigiBase®, the World Health Organization's spontaneous reporting system. We performed raw and subgroup disproportionality analyses using the reporting odds ratio and comparing ICIs with the entire database, other antineoplastic agents, and other antineoplastic agents gathered in VigiBase® since 2011. Across 103 safety reports referring to ICI exposure during the peri-pregnancy period, 56 reported pregnancy-related outcomes, of which 46 were without concomitant drugs as potential confounding factors. No signals of disproportionate reporting were found for spontaneous abortion, fetal growth restriction, and prematurity. In light of the expanding indications of ICIs, continuous surveillance by clinicians and pharmacovigilance experts is warranted, along with pharmacoepidemiological studies on other sources of real-world evidence, such as birth records, to precisely assess ICI exposure during the peri-pregnancy period and further characterize relevant outcomes.
Collapse
|
15
|
Cao D, Gao Y, Zhang RX, Wang FL, Li C, Wu MQ, Liu YF, Li DD, Chen G. Case report: Reproductive organ preservation and subsequent pregnancy for an infertility patient with lynch syndrome-associated synchronous endometrial cancer and colon cancer after treatment with a PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor. Front Immunol 2022; 13:1010490. [PMID: 36325347 PMCID: PMC9618861 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1010490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Currently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the mainstay of treatment for Lynch syndrome patients. However, the tumor regression features in radiology and pathology are inconsistent for patients who are treated with ICIs, which sometimes confuses surgical decision-making. Here, we report a case in which a 36-year-old patient suffering from infertility was diagnosed with Lynch syndrome-associated synchronous endometrial cancer and colon cancer, and persistently enlarged left iliac paravascular lymph nodes were detected after receiving sintilimab treatment, a programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) receptor inhibitor. Fortunately, when she was about to undergo hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, intraoperative pathology examination did not reveal any cancer cells in these lymph nodes, and therefore, her reproductive organs were preserved. Later, the patient successfully conceived and gave birth to a healthy male neonate with no immune-related adverse events (irAEs) during an 11-month follow-up. This case indicates that surgeons should carefully inspect the imaging characteristics after immunotherapy and that organ preservation is possible even for patients who fail to achieve complete clinical regression, which is especially important for female patients of childbearing age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Di Cao
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yu Gao
- Department of Obstetrics, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rong-xin Zhang
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fu-long Wang
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Cong Li
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Miao-qing Wu
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yi-fan Liu
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dan-dan Li
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- Biotherapy Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Dan-dan Li, ; Gong Chen,
| | - Gong Chen
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Dan-dan Li, ; Gong Chen,
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Koutras A, Ntounis T, Fasoulakis Z, Papalios T, Pittokopitou S, Prokopakis I, Syllaios A, Valsamaki A, Chionis A, Symeonidis P, Samara AA, Pagkalos A, Pergialiotis V, Theodora M, Antsaklis P, Daskalakis G, Kontomanolis EN. Cancer Treatment and Immunotherapy during Pregnancy. Pharmaceutics 2022; 14:pharmaceutics14102080. [PMID: 36297515 PMCID: PMC9611953 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14102080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/aim: Immunotherapy has, in recent years, witnessed an expansion in its indications for the treatment of cancer. Coupled with the fact that, nowadays, even more women choose to postpone parenthood, thus increasing their chances of having some kind of malignancy during pregnancy, more and more women are eligible for receiving immunotherapy during this period of their lives. The cases of cancer diagnosed during pregnancy is an ever-increasing trend nowadays. Materials and methods: The oncologists and clinicians treating women often face a range of ethical and therapeutic dilemmas due to the particularity of the patient’s conditions. The primary concern is the protection of the mother, firstly, and then the fetus (through adjustments to the various treatment regimens) if possible. Results and conclusions: Oncological drugs, radiation therapy, surgery, or a combination of all the above methods are selected, depending on the case. In this project, we studied the oncology drugs used for various types of gestational cancer, their appropriateness and timing, as well as their possible effects on the parent and embryo upon their administration. Various studies have shown that the administration of oncological drugs should be postponed until at least after the first trimester of pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonios Koutras
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Athens ‘ALEXANDRA’, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Lourou and Vasilissis Sofias Ave, 11528 Athens, Greece
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +30-694567622
| | - Thomas Ntounis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Athens ‘ALEXANDRA’, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Lourou and Vasilissis Sofias Ave, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Zacharias Fasoulakis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Athens ‘ALEXANDRA’, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Lourou and Vasilissis Sofias Ave, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Theodoros Papalios
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Athens ‘ALEXANDRA’, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Lourou and Vasilissis Sofias Ave, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Savia Pittokopitou
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Athens ‘ALEXANDRA’, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Lourou and Vasilissis Sofias Ave, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Prokopakis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Athens ‘ALEXANDRA’, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Lourou and Vasilissis Sofias Ave, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Syllaios
- 1st Department of Surgery, Laikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Agiou Thoma Str. 17, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Asimina Valsamaki
- Department of Internal Medicine, Koutlimbaneio and Triantafylleio General Hospital of Larissa, Tsakalof Str. 1, 41221 Larisa, Greece
| | - Athanasios Chionis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Laikon General Hospital of Athens, Agiou Thoma Str. 17, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Panagiotis Symeonidis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Democritus University of Thrace, 6th km Alexandroupolis–Makris, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Athina A. Samara
- Department of Embryology, University General Hospital of Larissa, Mezourlo, 41110 Larissa, Greece
| | - Athanasios Pagkalos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Xanthi, Neapoli, 67100 Xanthi, Greece
| | - Vasilios Pergialiotis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Athens ‘ALEXANDRA’, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Lourou and Vasilissis Sofias Ave, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Marianna Theodora
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Athens ‘ALEXANDRA’, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Lourou and Vasilissis Sofias Ave, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Panos Antsaklis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Athens ‘ALEXANDRA’, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Lourou and Vasilissis Sofias Ave, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Georgios Daskalakis
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Hospital of Athens ‘ALEXANDRA’, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Lourou and Vasilissis Sofias Ave, 11528 Athens, Greece
| | - Emmanuel N. Kontomanolis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Democritus University of Thrace, 6th km Alexandroupolis–Makris, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Transplacental Passage and Fetal Effects of Antineoplastic Treatment during Pregnancy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14133103. [PMID: 35804875 PMCID: PMC9264939 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary In this paper we perform an introduction about pregnancy-associated cancer (PAC) and transplacental passage of antineoplastic agents. Furthermore, we describe therapeutic use and potential toxic effects of chemotherapeutic drug (alkylating agents, antimetabolites agents, anthracyclines, topoisomerase inhibitors, antimitotic agents, actinomycin-D, bleomycin) and targeted agents during pregnancy. This manuscript may be a useful and practical guide for the management of PAC, which is a challenge for clinicians that have to consider alike maternal benefits and fetal potential risks correlated to the antineoplastic treatment. Abstract The incidence of PAC is relatively infrequent among pregnant women. However, it has gradually increased in recent years, becoming a challenging area for clinicians that should take into account in the same way maternal benefits and fetal potential risks correlated to the antineoplastic treatment. None of the antineoplastic drugs is completely risk-free during the pregnancy, the timing of exposure and transplacental transfer properties influence the toxicity of the fetus. Despite the lack of guidelines about the management of PAC, several studies have described the use and the potential fetal and neonatal adverse events of antineoplastic drugs during pregnancy. We provide a review of the available literature about the transplacental passage and fetal effects of chemotherapy and targeted agents, to guide the clinicians in the most appropriate choices for the management of PAC.
Collapse
|
18
|
Evens AM, Brandt JS, Peer CJ, Yin T, Schaar D, Farooq F, Mozarsky B, Figg WD, Sharon E. Checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy during pregnancy for relapsed-refractory Hodgkin lymphoma. Am J Hematol 2022; 97:833-838. [PMID: 35285979 PMCID: PMC9314600 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.26527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M. Evens
- Division of Blood Disorders Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey New Brunswick New Jersey USA
- Departments of Medicine and Maternal Fetal Medicine Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital New Brunswick New Jersey USA
| | - Justin S. Brandt
- Departments of Medicine and Maternal Fetal Medicine Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital New Brunswick New Jersey USA
| | - Cody J. Peer
- Clinical Pharmacology Program National Cancer Institute Bethesda Maryland USA
| | - Tyler Yin
- Clinical Pharmacology Program National Cancer Institute Bethesda Maryland USA
| | - Dale Schaar
- Division of Blood Disorders Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey New Brunswick New Jersey USA
| | - Faheem Farooq
- Division of Blood Disorders Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey New Brunswick New Jersey USA
| | - Brett Mozarsky
- Clinical Pharmacology Program National Cancer Institute Bethesda Maryland USA
| | - William D. Figg
- Clinical Pharmacology Program National Cancer Institute Bethesda Maryland USA
| | - Elad Sharon
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis National Cancer Institute Bethesda Maryland USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Salehi I, Porto L, Elser C, Singh J, Saibil S, Maxwell C. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Exposure in Pregnancy: A Scoping Review. J Immunother 2022; 45:231-238. [PMID: 35353074 PMCID: PMC9087868 DOI: 10.1097/cji.0000000000000418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Since their approval, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the standard of care for multiple malignancies. ICIs enhance tumor destruction by blocking important immunomodulatory pathways that regulate T-cell activation. These pathways include programmed cell death protein-1 and its ligands (programmed cell death protein-1 and programmed death ligand-1, respectively) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4. While blocking these pathways can enhance tumor destruction, these pathways are critical for the development of maternal tolerance towards the fetus. Therefore, if ICIs disrupt these immunomodulatory pathways, there could be a maternal immune response against the fetus, as was found in animal studies. With few reported cases of human pregnancy exposure to ICIs, the effects of ICIs on human pregnancy remain largely unknown. Here, we review and summarize the 6 cases of maternal exposure to immunotherapy that have been published before the present study. To add to the evidence, we present a case series of 2 patients who have been exposed to immunotherapy in pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Christine Elser
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto
| | - Jessica Singh
- Simcoe Muskoka Regional Cancer Program, Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre
| | - Samuel Saibil
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Muralidhara P, Sood V, Vinayak Ashok V, Bansal K. Pregnancy and Tumour: The Parallels and Differences in Regulatory T Cells. Front Immunol 2022; 13:866937. [PMID: 35493450 PMCID: PMC9043683 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.866937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunological tolerance plays a critical role during pregnancy as semi-allogeneic fetus must be protected from immune responses during the gestational period. Regulatory T cells (Tregs), a subpopulation of CD4+ T cells that express transcription factor Foxp3, are central to the maintenance of immunological tolerance and prevention of autoimmunity. Tregs are also known to accumulate at placenta in uterus during pregnancy, and they confer immunological tolerance at maternal-fetal interface by controlling the immune responses against alloantigens. Thus, uterine Tregs help in maintaining an environment conducive for survival of the fetus during gestation, and low frequency or dysfunction of Tregs is associated with recurrent spontaneous abortions and other pregnancy-related complications such as preeclampsia. Interestingly, there are many parallels in the development of placenta and solid tumours, and the tumour microenvironment is considered to be somewhat similar to that at maternal-fetal interface. Moreover, Tregs play a largely similar role in tumour immunity as they do at placenta- they create a tolerogenic system and suppress the immune responses against the cells within tumour and at maternal-fetal interface. In this review, we discuss the role of Tregs in supporting the proper growth of the embryo during pregnancy. We also highlight the similarities and differences between Tregs at maternal-fetal interface and tumour Tregs, in an attempt to draw a comparison between their roles in these two physiologic and pathologic states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Kushagra Bansal
- Molecular Biology and Genetics Unit (MBGU), Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research (JNCASR), Bangalore, India
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zhao SJ, Muyayalo KP, Luo J, Huang D, Mor G, Liao AH. Next generation of immune checkpoint molecules in maternal-fetal immunity. Immunol Rev 2022; 308:40-54. [PMID: 35234305 DOI: 10.1111/imr.13073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Successful pregnancy is a unique situation requires the maternal immune system to recognize and tolerate a semi-identical fetus and allow normal invasion of trophoblast cells. Although efforts have been made, the deep mechanisms of the maternal-fetal crosstalk have not yet been fully deciphered. Immune checkpoint molecules (ICMs) are a group of negative modulators of the immune response that avoid immune damage. They have been extensively studied in the fields of oncology and transplantation, while the latest evidence suggests that they are closely associated with pregnancy outcomes via multiple inhibitory mechanisms. Although studies have mostly demonstrated the regulatory role of the well-known PD-1, CTLA-4 at the maternal-fetal interface, what is unique about the newly discovered multiple ICMs remains a mystery. Here, we review the latest knowledge on ICMs, focusing on the first generation of checkpoints (PD-1, CTLA-4) and the next generation (Tim-3, Tigit, Lag-3, VISTA) highlighting their immunoregulatory roles in maternal-fetal tolerance and decidual vascular remodeling, and their involvement in pathological pregnancies. The content covers three aspects: the characteristics they possess, the dynamic expression profile of their expression at the maternal-fetal interface, and their involvement in pathological pregnancy. In immunotherapy strategies for pregnancy complications, upregulation of immune checkpoints may play a role. Meanwhile, the impact on pregnancy outcomes when using ICMs in clinical cancer treatment during pregnancy is a topic worth exploring. These may serve as a guide for future basic research and clinical applications of maternal-fetal immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Si-Jia Zhao
- Institute of Reproductive Health, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Kahindo P Muyayalo
- Institute of Reproductive Health, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jing Luo
- Institute of Reproductive Health, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Donghui Huang
- Institute of Reproductive Health, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Gil Mor
- Institute of Reproductive Health, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.,C.S. Mott Center for Human Growth and Development, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Ai-Hua Liao
- Institute of Reproductive Health, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wong SK, Nebhan CA, Johnson DB. Impact of Patient Age on Clinical Efficacy and Toxicity of Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy. Front Immunol 2021; 12:786046. [PMID: 34868071 PMCID: PMC8635107 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.786046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to the therapeutic armamentarium for solid malignancies has resulted in unprecedented improvements in patient outcomes in many cancers. The landscape of ICIs continues to evolve with novel approaches such as dual immune checkpoint blockade and combination therapies with other anticancer agents including cytotoxic chemotherapies and/or antiangiogenics. However, there is significant heterogeneity seen in antitumor responses, with certain patients deriving durable benefit, others experiencing initial benefit followed by acquired resistance necessitating change in therapy, and still others who are primarily refractory to ICIs. While generally better tolerated than traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy, ICIs are associated with unique toxicities, termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can be severe or even lethal. As a disease of aging, older individuals make up a large proportion of patients diagnosed with cancer, yet this population is often underrepresented in clinical trials. Because ICIs indirectly target malignant cells through T cell activation, it has been hypothesized that age-related changes to the immune system may impact the efficacy and toxicity of these drugs. In this review, we discuss differences in the clinical efficacy and toxicity of ICIs in patients at the extremes of age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selina K Wong
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Caroline A Nebhan
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Douglas B Johnson
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Immunotherapy for cancer treatment during pregnancy. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:e550-e561. [PMID: 34856152 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00525-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Revised: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Immunotherapy has greatly improved outcomes for subgroups of patients with cancer. As indications keep expanding, there is an unmet need to gain a better understanding of the effect of these therapies on pregnancy and fertility. During pregnancy, substantial adaptations occur in the maternal immune system to maintain protection against pathogens while avoiding detrimental reactions to the semi-allogeneic fetus. The pathways involved in the establishment of this fetomaternal tolerance can be hijacked by cancers. Immunotherapies that target these inhibitory pathways, or that directly interact with the regulatory immune cells involved in tolerance mechanisms, might therefore result in complications during pregnancy. Similarly, by activating the patient's immune system with immunotherapy, a broad range of immune-related adverse events can occur that could negatively affect the fetus or impede a future desired pregnancy. This Review summarises preclinical and clinical data related to the use of immunotherapy during pregnancy, including all approved immune checkpoint inhibitors, recombinant cytokines, cell therapies, vaccines, and immunomodulatory drugs.
Collapse
|
24
|
Anami Y, Minami S, Kumegawa A, Matsukawa H, Nishioka K, Noguchi T, Iwahashi N, Mizoguchi M, Nanjo S, Ota N, Mabuchi Y, Yagi S, Yamamoto Y, Ino K. Malignant melanoma treated with pembrolizumab during pregnancy: A case report and review of the literature. Mol Clin Oncol 2021; 15:242. [PMID: 34650809 PMCID: PMC8506525 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2021.2404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
There have been very few reports on the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors for malignant tumors during pregnancy. Herein, the current study reports a case of a patient diagnosed with advanced malignant melanoma who was treated with pembrolizumab during pregnancy. A 40-year-old primigravida underwent noninvasive prenatal testing at 10 weeks of gestation, and the result was inconclusive, suggesting the possibility of maternal malignancy. A biopsy of the gluteal mass led to a diagnosis of malignant melanoma, and computed tomography revealed extensive metastases in her lungs and lymph nodes. She had a strong desire to proceed with pregnancy. In consideration of fetal growth and maturation, monotherapy was administered with pembrolizumab from 21 weeks of gestation, aiming for 28 weeks of gestation. The fetus grew well without maternal complications. At 28 weeks of pregnancy, the patient gave birth to a healthy boy by cesarean section. There was no evidence of metastasis in the placenta. The patient received nivolumab-ipilimumab combination therapy from postpartum day 13, followed by nivolumab monotherapy, and has been alive with controlled disease for 20 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Anami
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-0012, Japan
| | - Sawako Minami
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-0012, Japan
| | - Aya Kumegawa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-0012, Japan
| | - Hitomi Matsukawa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-0012, Japan
| | - Kaho Nishioka
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-0012, Japan
| | - Tomoko Noguchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-0012, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Iwahashi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-0012, Japan
| | - Mika Mizoguchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-0012, Japan
| | - Sakiko Nanjo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-0012, Japan
| | - Nami Ota
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-0012, Japan
| | - Yasushi Mabuchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-0012, Japan
| | - Shigetaka Yagi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-0012, Japan
| | - Yuki Yamamoto
- Department of Dermatology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-0012, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Ino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-0012, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tanda ET, Croce E, Spagnolo F, Zullo L, Spinaci S, Genova C, Rossi G. Immunotherapy in Adolescents and Young Adults: What Remains in Cancer Survivors? Front Oncol 2021; 11:736123. [PMID: 34631569 PMCID: PMC8495150 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.736123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapy has changed the landscape of treatments for advanced disease in multiple neoplasms. More and more patients are long survivors from a metastatic disease. Most recently, the extension of indications and evidence of efficacy in early disease settings, such as the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting in breast cancer, lung cancer, glioma, and gastric cancer, places more attention on what happens to patients who survive cancer. In particular, we evaluated what happens in young patients, a population in whom some immune-related effects are still poorly described. Immunotherapy is already a reality in early disease settings and the scientific community is lagging in describing what to expect in adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients. For instance, the impact of these therapies on female and male fertility is not clear, similarly to the interaction that may occur between these drugs and pregnancy. This review aims to highlight these little-known topics that are difficult to evaluate in ad hoc studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrica Teresa Tanda
- Istituto di Ricovero e Cura A Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Ospedale Policlinico San Martino-Oncologia Medica 2, Genova, Italy.,Genetics of Rare Cancers, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
| | - Elena Croce
- Istituto di Ricovero e Cura A Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Ospedale Policlinico San Martino-Oncologia Medica 2, Genova, Italy
| | - Francesco Spagnolo
- Istituto di Ricovero e Cura A Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Ospedale Policlinico San Martino-Oncologia Medica 2, Genova, Italy
| | - Lodovica Zullo
- Istituto di Ricovero e Cura A Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Ospedale Policlinico San Martino-Oncologia Medica 2, Genova, Italy
| | - Stefano Spinaci
- Division of Breast Surgery, Ospedale Villa Scassi, Genova, Italy
| | - Carlo Genova
- UO Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), Università degli Studi di Genova, Genoa, Italy
| | - Giovanni Rossi
- Medical Oncology Department, Ospedale Padre Antero Micone, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Andrikopoulou A, Korakiti AM, Apostolidou K, Dimopoulos MA, Zagouri F. Immune checkpoint inhibitor administration during pregnancy: a case series. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100262. [PMID: 34487972 PMCID: PMC8426195 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 08/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been widely implemented in current clinical practice. Although cancer occurs in ∼1 out of 1000 pregnancies, treatment remains challenging. Until now, limited data exist regarding immunotherapy administration during pregnancy. This systemic review aims to synthesize all available data from immunotherapy administration in pregnant women and evaluate the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy during pregnancy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible studies were identified by a search of the PubMed Medline database and Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System Public Dashboard for the period 1 January 2000 to 1 April 2021; the algorithm consisted of a predefined combination of the words 'immunotherapy', 'cancer' and 'pregnancy'. PRISMA guidelines were applied in this study. RESULTS Overall, seven articles (seven pregnancies, nine neonates) were retrieved. The mean duration of immunotherapy administration was 9.8 weeks [standard deviation (SD): 11.27; median: 7.0; range: 1-32]. In all cases specified, melanoma was the malignancy reported. The mean gestational age at delivery was 30.4 weeks (SD: 5.03; median: 32.0; range: 24-38), whereas the mean weight of neonates at delivery was 1267 g (SD: 412.0; median: 1400; range: 590-1701). Only one neonate was born term at 38 weeks of pregnancy (11.1%; 1/9). Complications during pregnancy were observed in 71.4% of cases: intrauterine growth restriction (three cases), HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count) (one case), placental insufficiency (one case) and low fetal heart rate (one case). The mean progression-free survival and overall survival were 16.0 and 25.2 months, respectively. CONCLUSION The administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors during pregnancy is associated with increased incidence of pregnancy complications, prematurity and low birth weight. The administration of these regimens is not recommended during gestation. Whenever applied, close monitoring of the mother and the fetus is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Andrikopoulou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - A M Korakiti
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - K Apostolidou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - M A Dimopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - F Zagouri
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Garutti M, Lambertini M, Puglisi F. Checkpoint inhibitors, fertility, pregnancy, and sexual life: a systematic review. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100276. [PMID: 34597942 PMCID: PMC8487000 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (i.e. anti-PD1, anti-PDL1, and anti-CTLA4) have revolutionized the therapeutic approach of several cancer types. In a subset of metastatic patients, the duration of the response is so long that a cure might be hypothesized, and a treatment discontinuation strategy could be proposed. Considering that long-term efficacy, some patients could also plan to have a child. Moreover, immunotherapy is moving to the early setting in several diseases including melanoma and breast cancer that are common cancers in young patients. However, there is a paucity of data about their potential detrimental effect on fertility, pregnancy, or sexuality. Herein, we conducted a systematic review with the aim to comprehensively collect the available evidence about fertility, pregnancy, and sexual adverse effects of checkpoint inhibitors in order to help clinicians in daily practice and trialists to develop future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Garutti
- CRO Aviano National Cancer Institute IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.
| | - M Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Breast Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - F Puglisi
- CRO Aviano National Cancer Institute IRCCS, Aviano, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy; Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Romanelli MR, Mansour A, Topaz A, Olla D, Neumeister MW. Melanoma in Pregnancy and Pediatrics. Clin Plast Surg 2021; 48:699-705. [PMID: 34503730 DOI: 10.1016/j.cps.2021.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Rare variants of melanoma include melanoma in pregnancy and pediatric melanoma. Because of their low incidence, treatment recommendations are based on standards of treatment for cutaneous melanoma; however, each of these forms requires specific considerations during diagnosis, staging, and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael R Romanelli
- Institute for Plastic Surgery, Southern Illinois University, 747 North Rutledge Street #3, Springfield, IL 62702, USA
| | - Alaa Mansour
- Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, 747 North Rutledge Street #3, Springfield, IL 62702, USA
| | - Allyne Topaz
- Institute for Plastic Surgery, Southern Illinois University, 747 North Rutledge Street #3, Springfield, IL 62702, USA
| | - Danielle Olla
- Institute for Plastic Surgery, Southern Illinois University, 747 North Rutledge Street #3, Springfield, IL 62702, USA.
| | - Michael W Neumeister
- Department of Surgery, Institute for Plastic Surgery, Southern Illinois University, 747 North Rutledge Street #3, Springfield, IL 62702, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hassel JC, Livingstone E, Allam JP, Behre HM, Bojunga J, Klein HH, Landsberg J, Nawroth F, Schüring A, Susok L, Thoms KM, Kiesel L, Berking C. Fertility preservation and management of pregnancy in melanoma patients requiring systemic therapy. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100248. [PMID: 34438241 PMCID: PMC8390524 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Revised: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Melanoma is one of the most common cancers in adolescents and adults at fertile age, especially in women. With novel and more effective systemic therapies that began to profoundly change the dismal outcome of melanoma by prolonging overall survival, the wish for fertility preservation or even parenthood has to be considered for a growing portion of melanoma patients-from the patients' as well as from the physicians' perspective. The dual blockade of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway by B-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine kinase and mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors and the immune checkpoint inhibition by anti-programmed cell death protein 1 and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 monoclonal antibodies constitute the current standard systemic approaches to combat locally advanced or metastatic melanoma. Here, the preclinical data and clinical evidence of these systemic therapies are reviewed in terms of their potential gonadotoxicity, teratogenicity, embryotoxicity and fetotoxicity. Recommendations for routine fertility and contraception counseling of melanoma patients at fertile age are provided in line with interdisciplinary recommendations for the diagnostic work-up of these patients and for fertility-protective measures. Differentiated recommendations for the systemic therapy in both the adjuvant and the advanced, metastatic treatment situation are given. In addition, the challenges of pregnancy during systemic melanoma therapy are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Hassel
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - E Livingstone
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - J P Allam
- Department of Andrology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - H M Behre
- Center for Reproductive Medicine and Andrology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - J Bojunga
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Nutrition Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - H H Klein
- Department of Internal Medicine, Endocrinology & Diabetology & Gastroenterology and Hepatology, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - J Landsberg
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - F Nawroth
- Center for Infertility, Prenatal Medicine, Endocrinology and Osteology, Amedes Medical Center MVZ Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - A Schüring
- Fertility Center MVZ KITZ Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - L Susok
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - K M Thoms
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergy, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - L Kiesel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - C Berking
- Department of Dermatology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen EMN, Deutsches Zentrum Immuntherapie (DZI), Erlangen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Mittra A, Naqash AR, Murray JH, Finnigan S, Kwak-Kim J, Ivy SP, Chen AP, Sharon E. Outcomes of pregnancy during immunotherapy treatment for cancer: Analysis of clinical trials sponsored by the National Cancer Institute. Oncologist 2021; 26:e1883-e1886. [PMID: 34397143 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite expanding indications for immunotherapeutic agents, there is limited understanding about their clinical effects on pregnancy outcomes. Generally, pregnant cancer patients are excluded from clinical trials, and inadvertent pregnancies on trial result in patients being taken off due to concerns for fetal toxicity. To answer this question of pregnancy outcomes on immunotherapy-based trials, we performed a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program-Adverse Event Reporting System (CTEP-AERS) for unexpected pregnancies during NCI-CTEP sponsored immunotherapy clinical trials between 2011 and 2020. We identified 9 female patients who had unexpected pregnancies, of whom 7 chose to take their pregnancies to term. All 7 pregnancies resulted in vaginal births of apparently normal infants. This is the first report of pregnancy outcomes in multiple female patients exposed to immunotherapy. Our data suggest the need for further research to better evaluate and define contraception recommendations during immunotherapy treatment for cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arjun Mittra
- The Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.,Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Abdul Rafeh Naqash
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - James H Murray
- Technical Resources International, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Shanda Finnigan
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Joanne Kwak-Kim
- Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - S Percy Ivy
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Alice P Chen
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Elad Sharon
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the worldwide. With the growing
burden of cancer, the studies on early diagnosis, treatment and prevention of
cancer are rapidly increasing. Recently, many new therapeutic strategies have
been discovered, among which immunotherapy has dramatically changed the outlook
for cancer treatment. Several clinical trials are underway around the world to
produce potential treatments. However, these trials set certain strict joining
conditions, so that the clinical data cannot be fully applied in the real world.
To help clinical oncologists with treatment decision-making, this review
collected recent studies on special populations receiving immunotherapy,
including organ transplant patients, pregnant women, pediatric patients,
patients with pulmonary tuberculosis, patients with human immunodeficiency
virus, and patients with autoimmune diseases and mental illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qianyun Shan
- The Second Clinical Medical College, 70571Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Diagnosis & Treatment Technology on Thoracic Oncology (lung and esophagus), Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (89680Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), People's Republic of China.,Department of Thoracic Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), People's Republic of China.,Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongyang Lu
- The Second Clinical Medical College, 70571Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Diagnosis & Treatment Technology on Thoracic Oncology (lung and esophagus), Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (89680Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), People's Republic of China.,Department of Thoracic Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), People's Republic of China.,Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer (IBMC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Conception and viable twin pregnancy in a patient with metastatic melanoma while treated with CTLA-4 and PD-1 checkpoint inhibition. Melanoma Res 2021; 30:423-425. [PMID: 32073510 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The treatment of cancer during pregnancy presents a unique challenge. Optimal treatments are often altered or even delayed to protect fetal growth and organogenesis. The landscape of cancer treatment has shifted dramatically over the past several years and treatment with checkpoint inhibitors, including anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA-4 agents has revolutionized treatment outcomes for patients across numerous tumor types. Until recently, little is known about the use of checkpoint inhibitor therapy during pregnancy; however, in animal studies, exposure to checkpoint inhibitors at the time of or after conception led to high incidences of spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, and premature delivery. In this report, we describe the successful pregnancy and clinical course of a patient diagnosed with metastatic melanoma who conceived twins while undergoing dual checkpoint blockade with ipilumumab and nivolumab. While there are case reports of patients receiving checkpoint inhibitors during pregnancy, our case is the first to describe a successful pregnancy that was conceived during treatment with combination anti-CTLA-4 and PD-1, with therapy continuing throughout pregnancy. This case adds to the growing evidence that favorable pregnancy outcomes may be possible while receiving checkpoint inhibition, which will hopefully allow for more optimal treatment of young pregnant patients with cancer.
Collapse
|
33
|
Rzeniewicz K, Larkin J, Menzies AM, Turajlic S. Immunotherapy use outside clinical trial populations: never say never? Ann Oncol 2021; 32:866-880. [PMID: 33771665 PMCID: PMC9246438 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.03.199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Based on favourable outcomes in clinical trials, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), most notably programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors, are now widely used across multiple cancer types. However, due to their strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, clinical studies often do not address challenges presented by non-trial populations. DESIGN This review summarises available data on the efficacy and safety of ICIs in trial-ineligible patients, including those with autoimmune disease, chronic viral infections, organ transplants, organ dysfunction, poor performance status, and brain metastases, as well as the elderly, children, and those who are pregnant. In addition, we review data concerning other real-world challenges with ICIs, including timing of therapy switch, relationships to radiotherapy or surgery, re-treatment after an immune-related toxicity, vaccinations in patients on ICIs, and current experience around ICI and coronavirus disease-19. Where possible, we provide recommendations to aid the often-difficult decision-making process in those settings. CONCLUSIONS Data suggest that ICIs are often active and have an acceptable safety profile in the populations described above, with the exception of PD-1 inhibitors in solid organ transplant recipients. Decisions about whether to treat with ICIs should be personalised and require multidisciplinary input and careful counselling of patients with respect to potential risks and benefits. Clinical judgements need to be carefully weighed, considering factors such as underlying cancer type, feasibility of alternative treatment options, or activity in trial-eligible patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Rzeniewicz
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK; Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - J Larkin
- Renal and Skin Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia and The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - S Turajlic
- Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK; Renal and Skin Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Silverstein J, Post AL, Chien AJ, Olin R, Tsai KK, Ngo Z, Van Loon K. Multidisciplinary Management of Cancer During Pregnancy. JCO Oncol Pract 2021; 16:545-557. [PMID: 32910882 DOI: 10.1200/op.20.00077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer during pregnancy is relatively rare but is increasing in frequency in countries in which the maternal child-bearing age continues to rise. The complexities of medical decision making are underscored by the need to weigh the potential benefits of any intervention for the mother against the risks to the fetus. A majority of diagnostic evaluations can be performed safely in the setting of pregnancy and should not be delayed. Noninvasive prenatal testing that shows discordance with fetal karyotype can be a clue to an underlying maternal malignancy. After diagnosis, a multidisciplinary team should formulate a care plan for both the mother and the fetus. Key topics for discussion should include the mother's prognosis, standard treatment plan, and predictions of how modifications for a continuing pregnancy will affect the treatment plan and overall prognosis. In the context of this knowledge, frank discussions about pregnancy termination should be addressed with the patient, if appropriate. Selection of a plan for oncologic management in the case of a pregnant woman is based on the type of cancer, the tumor biology, and the tumor stage. Additional complexities for pregnant patients are typically related to the gestational age of the fetus, the dynamic physiologic changes of pregnancy, and the limited safety data for administration of most anticancer therapies during pregnancy. In this article, we summarize data related to different classes of anticancer therapies as well as considerations for the management of selected cancers. Finally, we provide some key principles that should be considered in the management of patients with cancer during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordyn Silverstein
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Annalisa L Post
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - A Jo Chien
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Rebecca Olin
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Katy K Tsai
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Zoe Ngo
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.,Department of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Katherine Van Loon
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Schwab R, Anic K, Hasenburg A. Cancer and Pregnancy: A Comprehensive Review. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:3048. [PMID: 34207252 PMCID: PMC8234287 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13123048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer diagnosis and treatment in pregnant women is a challenging situation. A multidisciplinary network of specialists is required to guide both, the expecting mother and the unborn child through the diagnostic workup and the cytotoxic therapy, by balancing the respective risks and benefits. Tumor entity, stage, biology and gestational week at diagnosis determine the appropriate approach. As premature delivery emerged as one of the main risk factors for adverse long-term outcome of the progeny, it should be avoided, if reasonable from the oncological perspective. This article offers a comprehensive review with respect to the various aspects of cancer in pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxana Schwab
- Department of Obstetrics and Women’s Health, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany; (K.A.); (A.H.)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Brahmer JR, Abu-Sbeih H, Ascierto PA, Brufsky J, Cappelli LC, Cortazar FB, Gerber DE, Hamad L, Hansen E, Johnson DB, Lacouture ME, Masters GA, Naidoo J, Nanni M, Perales MA, Puzanov I, Santomasso BD, Shanbhag SP, Sharma R, Skondra D, Sosman JA, Turner M, Ernstoff MS. Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse events. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 9:e002435. [PMID: 34172516 PMCID: PMC8237720 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 326] [Impact Index Per Article: 108.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the standard of care for the treatment of several cancers. While these immunotherapies have improved patient outcomes in many clinical settings, they bring accompanying risks of toxicity, specifically immune-related adverse events (irAEs). There is a need for clear, effective guidelines for the management of irAEs during ICI treatment, motivating the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) to convene an expert panel to develop a clinical practice guideline. The panel discussed the recognition and management of single and combination ICI irAEs and ultimately developed evidence- and consensus-based recommendations to assist medical professionals in clinical decision-making and to improve outcomes for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie R Brahmer
- Department of Oncology and the Thoracic Oncology, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Hamzah Abu-Sbeih
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
| | - Paolo Antonio Ascierto
- Unit of Melanoma Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapy, National Tumour Institute IRCCS Fondazione 'G. Pascale', Napoli, Italy
| | - Jill Brufsky
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Laura C Cappelli
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Frank B Cortazar
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- New York Nephrology Vasculitis and Glomerular Center, Albany, New York, USA
| | - David E Gerber
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Lamya Hamad
- Department of Pharmacy, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Eric Hansen
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Douglas B Johnson
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Mario E Lacouture
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Gregory A Masters
- Department of Medicine, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center, Newark, Delaware, USA
| | - Jarushka Naidoo
- Department of Oncology and the Thoracic Oncology, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Department of Oncology, Beaumont Hospital Dublin, The Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Michele Nanni
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Miguel-Angel Perales
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Igor Puzanov
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Bianca D Santomasso
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Satish P Shanbhag
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Cancer Specialist of North Florida, Fleming Island, Florida, USA
| | - Rajeev Sharma
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Dimitra Skondra
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Sosman
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Michelle Turner
- Department of Oncology and the Thoracic Oncology, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Marc S Ernstoff
- Division of Cancer Treatment & Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Florou V, Puri S, Garrido-Laguna I, Wilky BA. Considerations for immunotherapy in patients with cancer and comorbid immune dysfunction. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2021; 9:1035. [PMID: 34277835 PMCID: PMC8267318 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-5207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been widely incorporated for cancer treatment in a variety of solid and hematologic malignancies. Multiple clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 axis inhibition in the metastatic and adjuvant settings. Due to the risks of autoimmune toxicity with these agents, stringent inclusion/exclusion criteria were employed in those initial clinical trials. These criteria led to exclusion or underrepresentation of a variety of patient populations with underlying immune dysfunction. These populations included patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases, solid organ or bone marrow transplant recipients, patients with HIV or viral hepatitis infections, patients receiving concurrent chronic steroid therapy, as well as patients who were elderly, pregnant, or had poor performance status. Thus, established guidelines on the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in these patients are lacking, and evidence to support efficacy or toxicity are overall limited to retrospective studies and case series. Fortunately, ongoing clinical trials are now including these patients and are shedding light on whether these underrepresented populations can also safely benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies. In this review, we summarize the most clinically relevant available data on the use of checkpoint inhibitors in immunocompromised patient groups with a primary focus on safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vaia Florou
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Sonam Puri
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Ignacio Garrido-Laguna
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Breelyn A Wilky
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Le-Nguyen A, Rys RN, Petrogiannis-Haliotis T, Johnson NA. Successful pregnancy and fetal outcome following previous treatment with pembrolizumab for relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2021; 5:e1432. [PMID: 34047076 PMCID: PMC8789614 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Revised: 03/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is one of the most frequently diagnosed neoplasms in young adults and is curable even in the relapse setting. Many patients seek advice regarding pregnancy once they have a sustained complete remission (CR). PD1 inhibitors are effective in inducing CRs in relapsed cHL, but little is known about their effects on pregnancy, fetal outcomes, or risk of relapse. The PD1/PDL1 axis is vital in the maintenance of pregnancy, allowing for fetal tolerance. This axis is also a key pathway by which Hodgkin Reed Sternberg cells escape immune surveillance. Thus, exposure to PD1 inhibitors in the context of a pregnant cHL survivor could potentially lead to maternal and fetal complications as well as increase the risk of relapse. Pregnancy and fetal outcomes following PD1 inhibitors have been reported in women with melanoma, but not cHL. Such data may help physicians counsel their patients on this topic. CASE This case describes a 25-year-old woman who was diagnosed with advanced stage cHL that was treated with multiple courses of chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) for primary refractory disease. She experienced a relapse eight months following ASCT and was treated with the PD1 inhibitor pembrolizumab. She completed a total of 21 cycles, achieving a CR after cycle five. After 2 years of sustained CR off pembrolizumab, she had an unassisted and uneventful pregnancy. She delivered a healthy baby boy with no significant complications. He reached his normal milestones in his first year. She remains in CR four years following her last dose of pembrolizumab, evoking the possibility of her being cured of cHL. CONCLUSION Successful pregnancies and fetal outcomes, while maintaining clinical remissions, are possible in women with relapsed cHL treated with pembrolizumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ryan N Rys
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Tina Petrogiannis-Haliotis
- Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Pathology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Nathalie A Johnson
- Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Luttwak E, Gurevich-Shapiro A, Azem F, Lishner M, Klieger C, Herishanu Y, Perry C, Avivi I. Novel agents for the treatment of lymphomas during pregnancy: A comprehensive literature review. Blood Rev 2021; 49:100831. [PMID: 33931297 DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2021.100831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Revised: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Lymphoproliferative diseases occurring during pregnancy present unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges aiming to achieve maternal cure without impairing fetal health, growth, and survival. These goals are further complicated by the fast-paced emergence of novel therapies and their introduction as standard of care, even in newly diagnosed patients. Due to the rarity of hematological malignancies in pregnancy and the exclusion of pregnancy in almost all clinical trials, available data on the fetal effects of novel drugs are limited to animal models and case reports. The current review addresses the entire multidisciplinary team involved in treating pregnant patients with lymphoproliferative diseases. We describe novel agents according to their mechanism of action, and summarize our knowledge of their effects during the gestational period, particularly those associated with fetotoxicity. Therapeutic dilemmas associated with the employment of these new agents are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Luttwak
- Division of Hematology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - A Gurevich-Shapiro
- Division of Hematology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Department of Immunology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
| | - F Azem
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lis Maternity Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - M Lishner
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Research Institue, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel
| | - C Klieger
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lis Maternity Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Y Herishanu
- Division of Hematology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - C Perry
- Division of Hematology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - I Avivi
- Division of Hematology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Gonzalez-Cao M, Puertolas T, Riveiro M, Muñoz-Couselo E, Ortiz C, Paredes R, Podzamczer D, Manzano JL, Molto J, Revollo B, Carrera C, Mateu L, Fancelli S, Espinosa E, Clotet B, Martinez-Picado J, Cerezuela P, Soria A, Marquez I, Mandala M, Berrocal A. Cancer immunotherapy in special challenging populations: recommendations of the Advisory Committee of Spanish Melanoma Group (GEM). J Immunother Cancer 2021; 9:jitc-2020-001664. [PMID: 33782108 PMCID: PMC8009216 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer immunotherapy based on the use of antibodies targeting the so-called checkpoint inhibitors, such as programmed cell death-1 receptor, its ligand, or CTLA-4, has shown durable clinical benefit and survival improvement in melanoma and other tumors. However, there are some special situations that could be a challenge for clinical management. Persons with chronic infections, such as HIV-1 or viral hepatitis, latent tuberculosis, or a history of solid organ transplantation, could be candidates for cancer immunotherapy, but their management requires a multidisciplinary approach. The Spanish Melanoma Group (GEM) panel in collaboration with experts in virology and immunology from different centers in Spain reviewed the literature and developed evidence-based guidelines for cancer immunotherapy management in patients with chronic infections and immunosuppression. These are the first clinical guidelines for cancer immunotherapy treatment in special challenging populations. Cancer immunotherapy in chronically infected or immunosuppressed patients is feasible but needs a multidisciplinary approach in order to decrease the risk of complications related to the coexistent comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Gonzalez-Cao
- Translational Cancer Research Unit, Instituto Oncologico Dr Rosell, Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Teresa Puertolas
- Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Aragón, Spain
| | - Mar Riveiro
- Liver Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Eva Muñoz-Couselo
- Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Carolina Ortiz
- Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Roger Paredes
- IrsiCaixa AIDS Research Institute, Badalona, Catalunya, Spain.,Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Daniel Podzamczer
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Jose Luis Manzano
- Oncology Department, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Jose Molto
- IrsiCaixa AIDS Research Institute, Badalona, Catalunya, Spain.,Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Boris Revollo
- IrsiCaixa AIDS Research Institute, Badalona, Catalunya, Spain.,Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Cristina Carrera
- Dermatology Department, Melanoma Group IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Lourdes Mateu
- IrsiCaixa AIDS Research Institute, Badalona, Catalunya, Spain.,Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Sara Fancelli
- Translational Cancer Research Unit, Instituto Oncologico Dr Rosell, Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.,Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Careggi, Firenze, Toscana, Italy
| | - Enrique Espinosa
- Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Bonaventura Clotet
- IrsiCaixa AIDS Research Institute, Badalona, Catalunya, Spain.,Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Javier Martinez-Picado
- IrsiCaixa AIDS Research Institute, Badalona, Catalunya, Spain.,Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Pablo Cerezuela
- Oncology Department, Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Ainara Soria
- Oncology Department, Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ivan Marquez
- Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mario Mandala
- Oncology Department, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Alfonso Berrocal
- Oncology Department, Consorci Hospital General Universitari de Valencia, Valencia, Comunitat Valenciana, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Benoit L, Mir O, Vialard F, Berveiller P. Cancer during Pregnancy: A Review of Preclinical and Clinical Transplacental Transfer of Anticancer Agents. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:1238. [PMID: 33799824 PMCID: PMC8000411 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Revised: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The occurrence of cancer during pregnancy is observed in 1 in 1000 pregnancies and is expected to increase given the trend of delaying childbearing. While breast cancer is the most common, the incidence of other cancers, such as cervical, ovarian, and lung cancers as well as hemopathies and melanomas, is also increasing. Thus, cancer occurrence in pregnant women raises questions of management during pregnancy and, especially, assessment of the treatment benefit-risk ratio to ensure optimal management for the mother while ensuring the safety of the fetus. Chemotherapy remains a cornerstone of cancer management. If the use of anticancer agents appears possible during pregnancy, while avoiding the first trimester, the extent of placental transfer of different anticancer agents varies considerably thereafter. Furthermore, the significant physiological pharmacokinetic variations observed in pregnant women may have an impact on the placental transfer of anticancer agents. Given the complexity of predicting placental transfer of anticancer agents, preclinical studies are therefore mandatory. The aim of this review was to provide updated data on in vivo and ex vivo transplacental transfer of anticancer agents used in the management of the most common pregnancy-associated cancers to better manage these highly complex cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laure Benoit
- Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 78300 Poissy, France;
| | - Olivier Mir
- Department of Ambulatory Cancer Care, Gustave Roussy, 94800 Villejuif, France;
| | - François Vialard
- Université Paris-Saclay, UMR 1198, INRAE, BREED, RHuMA, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France;
- Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d’Alfort, BREED, 94700 Maisons-Alfort, France
- Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Department of Genetics, 78300 Poissy, France
| | - Paul Berveiller
- Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy Saint-Germain-en-Laye, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 78300 Poissy, France;
- Université Paris-Saclay, UMR 1198, INRAE, BREED, RHuMA, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France;
- Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d’Alfort, BREED, 94700 Maisons-Alfort, France
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Wolters V, Heimovaara J, Maggen C, Cardonick E, Boere I, Lenaerts L, Amant F. Management of pregnancy in women with cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:314-322. [PMID: 33649001 PMCID: PMC7925815 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Revised: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
As the incidence of cancer in pregnancy has been increasing in recent decades, more specialists are confronted with a complex oncologic–obstetric decision-making process. With the establishment of (inter)national registries, including the International Network on Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy, and an increasing number of smaller cohort studies, more evidence on the management of cancer during pregnancy is available. As fetal, neonatal, and short-term pediatric outcomes after cancer treatment are reassuring, more women receive treatment during pregnancy. Prenatal treatment should adhere to standard treatment as much as possible to optimize maternal prognosis, always taking into account fetal well-being. In order to guarantee the optimal treatment for both mother and child, a multidisciplinary team of specialists with expertise should be involved. Apart from oncologic treatment, a well-considered obstetric and perinatal management plan discussed with the future parents is crucial. Results of non-invasive prenatal testing are inconclusive in women with cancer and alternatives for prenatal anomaly screening should be used. Especially in women treated with chemotherapy, serial ultrasounds are strongly recommended to follow-up fetal growth and cervical length. After birth, a neonatal assessment allows the identification of any cancer or treatment-related adverse events. In addition, placental histologic examination aims to assess the fetal risk of metastasis, especially in women with malignant melanoma or metastatic disease. Breastfeeding is discouraged when systemic treatment needs to be continued after birth. At least a 3-week interval between the last treatment and nursing is recommended to prevent any treatment-induced neonatal effects from most non-platinum chemotherapeutic agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Wolters
- Department of Gynecology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Nederlands Kanker Instituut, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Charlotte Maggen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven and Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Elyce Cardonick
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, New Jersey, USA
| | - Ingrid Boere
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Frédéric Amant
- Department of Gynecology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Nederlands Kanker Instituut, Amsterdam, The Netherlands .,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Özdemir BC. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related hypogonadism and infertility: a neglected issue in immuno-oncology. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 9:jitc-2020-002220. [PMID: 33589529 PMCID: PMC7887354 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2020-002220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite a significant amount of data on incidence and therapy of immune-related adverse events affecting virtually all organ systems, the potential impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) on gonadal function has not been sufficiently studied. The limited evidence available suggests that ICI-related primary hypogonadism due to orchitis as well as secondary hypogonadism due to hypophysitis are a potential risk for infertility. A systematic investigation of gonadal function under ICIs is warranted given the increasing application of ICIs in the adjuvant setting, among young adults and children and the possible influence of sex hormone levels on the efficacy and toxicity of ICIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berna C Özdemir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland .,International Cancer Prevention Institute, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Eikmans M, van der Zwan A, Claas FHJ, van der Hoorn ML, Heidt S. Got your mother in a whirl: The role of maternal T cells and myeloid cells in pregnancy. HLA 2020; 96:561-579. [PMID: 32841539 DOI: 10.1111/tan.14055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Revised: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Appropriate development of the placenta is required for healthy pregnancy to occur. After implantation of the fertilized blastocyst, fetal trophoblasts invade the endometrium and myometrium of the mother's uterus to establish placentation. In this process, fetal trophoblasts encounter maternal immune cells. In this review, we focus on the role of maternal T cells and myeloid cells (macrophages, dendritic cells) in pregnancy and their interaction with trophoblasts. To retain immunologic tolerization, trophoblasts evade immune recognition by T cells and produce factors that modulate their phenotype and function. On top of that, the local environment at the maternal-fetal interface favors expansion of regulatory T cells. Macrophages and dendritic cells are essential in maintaining a healthy pregnancy. They produce soluble factors and act as antigen-presenting cells, thereby interacting with T cells. Herein, M2 macrophages, immature dendritic cells, CD4+ Th2 cells, and regulatory T cells represent an axis that maintains a local immune tolerant environment. We consider outstanding issues concerning these cell types and their pathways, which need to be addressed in future investigations. Data from recent single-cell sequencing experiments of the placental bed, to study heterogeneity of maternal immune cells and to predict cell-cell interactions, are discussed. Novel ways for long-term culturing of primary trophoblasts allow for cell-cell interaction studies in a functional way. Future directions should include study of the functionality of currently known and newly identified decidual immune cell subsets in healthy and complicated pregnancies, and their interaction with and modulation by trophoblast cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Eikmans
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Anita van der Zwan
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frans H J Claas
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Sawyers AE, Pavlick AC, Weber JS, Osman I, Stein JA. Management of Melanoma during Pregnancy: A Case Series of 11 Women Treated at NYU Langone Health. Oncology 2020; 98:847-852. [PMID: 32894847 DOI: 10.1159/000506811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Melanoma is one of the most common malignancies diagnosed during pregnancy. This study examined the impact of pregnancy on management decisions of melanoma patients treated at NYU Langone Health (NYULH). METHODS We analyzed data for patients who were pregnant at initial or recurrent melanoma diagnosis at NYULH from 2012 to 2019 with prospective protocol-driven follow-up. RESULTS Of the 900 female patients accrued during this period, 11 women in the childbearing range were pregnant at melanoma diagnosis. Six patients presented with early (stage 0 or I) disease and five with advanced (stage III or IV) melanoma. Women with early stage disease had normal deliveries and minimal changes to their treatment timeline and regimen. However, patients with more advanced stage disease opted for either termination of the pregnancy or early delivery and altered treatment timelines because of pregnancy. CONCLUSION Both melanoma stage and gestational age at diagnosis contribute to the differences in the therapeutic management of melanoma in pregnant women. Given the complexity and variety of each case of melanoma during pregnancy, informed discussion between patients and physicians allows for individualized treatment plans that address each patient's unique situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia E Sawyers
- Interdisciplinary Melanoma Cooperative Group, New York, New York, USA.,Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York, New York, USA
| | - Anna C Pavlick
- Interdisciplinary Melanoma Cooperative Group, New York, New York, USA.,Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Weber
- Interdisciplinary Melanoma Cooperative Group, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Iman Osman
- Interdisciplinary Melanoma Cooperative Group, New York, New York, USA.,Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jennifer A Stein
- Interdisciplinary Melanoma Cooperative Group, New York, New York, USA, .,Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York, New York, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Zelin E, Conforti C, Giuffrida R, Deinlein T, di Meo N, Zalaudek I. Melanoma in pregnancy: certainties unborn. Melanoma Manag 2020; 7:MMT48. [PMID: 32922730 PMCID: PMC7475795 DOI: 10.2217/mmt-2020-0007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Melanoma diagnosed during childbearing period or up to 1 year after delivery is defined as pregnancy-associated melanoma (PAM). There is some evidence that PAM has worse prognosis if compared with melanoma in nonpregnant women, although literature is still inconclusive. Many biological mechanisms could explain this behavior, such as hormonal and immune status, increased lymphangiogenesis but also delay in diagnostic and therapeutic management. If PAM is suspected, a prompt excisional biopsy under local anesthesia can be performed regardless of the gestational period. Conversely, additional staging procedures (such as sentinel lymph node biopsy or imaging) and systemic therapy are still debatable during pregnancy. A multidisciplinary tailored approach should be preferred, together with exhaustive counseling of the mother.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Zelin
- Dermatology & Venereology Department, Dermatology Clinic, Maggiore Hospital, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Claudio Conforti
- Dermatology & Venereology Department, Dermatology Clinic, Maggiore Hospital, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Roberta Giuffrida
- Department of Clinical & Experimental Medicine, Dermatology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Teresa Deinlein
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Nicola di Meo
- Dermatology & Venereology Department, Dermatology Clinic, Maggiore Hospital, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Iris Zalaudek
- Dermatology & Venereology Department, Dermatology Clinic, Maggiore Hospital, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Ziogas DC, Diamantopoulos P, Benopoulou O, Anastasopoulou A, Bafaloukos D, Stratigos AJ, Kirkwood JM, Gogas H. Prognosis and Management of BRAF V600E-Mutated Pregnancy-Associated Melanoma. Oncologist 2020; 25:e1209-e1220. [PMID: 32271498 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately one third of women who develop melanoma at childbearing age are diagnosed during gestation or the postpartum period, facing pregnancy-associated melanoma (PAM). However, only some retrospective studies with heterogeneous data have analyzed the impact of pregnancy on melanoma development, and no evidence exists about the behavior and the management of BRAF-mutated disease. SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS In order to better describe the evolution of BRAF V600E-mutated PAM, we present here all consecutive cases diagnosed in our site during the last 7 years, recording oncological, obstetrical, and perinatal parameters, as well as the therapeutic decisions for both melanoma and gestation. Based on our institutional experience, we weigh the current published evidence and discuss upcoming clinical considerations about the prognosis of PAM, the role of BRAF status, and the possible treatment options during pregnancy in localized or advanced/metastatic disease. Five women were diagnosed with newly metastatic or relapsed BRAF V600E-mutated PAM (four during gestation and one in the 1st year postpartum) between 2012 and 2019. All of them developed extensive metastatic disease with multiple organ involvement, and four developed brain metastases. All cases experienced melanoma progression in less than 6 months under targeted therapy and died soon independently of the followed sequence of treatments. All the neonates were delivered alive and healthy, but one developed melanoma earlier than the second year of life. RESULTS Reviewing the literature to confirm our unfavorable outcomes, no specific data on BRAF-mutated PAM were retrieved and current evidence still supports that the prognosis of PAM should be guided by the established risk factors, whereas the management of advanced/metastatic PAM should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. CONCLUSION More data are required to ascertain whether BRAF-mutated profile adversely affects PAM outcome, although the clinicians should be aware to detect any potential melanoma lesion during pregnancy as soon as possible, treating it locally, regardless of its BRAF status. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The prognosis and management of pregnancy-associated melanoma whether BRAF-mutated or wild type, is currently guided by the same parameters as in the nonpregnant condition. In this special nontrial subpopulation, BRAF-mutated status seems to have a detrimental effect on disease outcome, independently of the following treatments. In early stage melanoma, wide local excision with or without sentinel lymph node dissection may be curative at any trimester of gestation, while in advanced/metastatic setting, therapeutic strategy including immune-checkpoint or BRAF/MEK inhibitors, is more challenging, regardless of BRAF status, and should be based on an individualized decision in each case at a multidisciplinary level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios C Ziogas
- First Department of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Panagiotis Diamantopoulos
- First Department of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Olga Benopoulou
- First Department of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Amalia Anastasopoulou
- First Department of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Alexander J Stratigos
- Department of Dermatology-Venereology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Andreas Sygros Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - John M Kirkwood
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Helen Gogas
- First Department of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Colucci
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine and Centre for Trophoblast Research. National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 0SW, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Pregnancy with successful foetal and maternal outcome in a melanoma patient treated with nivolumab in the first trimester: case report and review of the literature. Melanoma Res 2019; 29:333-337. [PMID: 30730328 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Although T-cell checkpoint blockade has revolutionized melanoma therapy, metastatic melanoma in pregnancy remains a challenging area of unmet need. Treatment with anti-PD1 therapy decreases foetal-maternal tolerance and increases the risk of pregnancy loss in animal studies and is considered category D by the Food and Drug Administration. We describe a unique case of conception and pregnancy, with successful maternal and foetal outcomes, in a patient with metastatic melanoma who had received combination anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD1 therapy. A 32-year-old G0P0 lady, with a 10-year history of infertility of unclear cause, was found to be 7 weeks pregnant after 14 months of nivolumab maintenance therapy, having previously received combination ipilimumab and nivolumab. Nivolumab was ceased upon discovery of pregnancy in the first trimester. The patient had an uneventful pregnancy, followed by spontaneously premature labour, and delivered by caesarean section at 33 weeks' gestation. The foetus had moderate intrauterine growth restriction, as well as congenital hypothyroidism, which possibly constitutes the first documented case of foetal immune-related adverse event from maternal anti-PD1 exposure. No adverse events were noted in the mother. At 6 months of follow-up postpartum, the mother had a sustained complete response to treatment, and the baby had appropriate weight gain with normal developmental milestones. We summarize and discuss the available literature of immune checkpoint inhibitor exposure in pregnancy, which consists of a total of three case reports.
Collapse
|
50
|
Abstract
Introduction: Lymphoproliferative diseases occurring during pregnancy present the treating physician with unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, aiming to achieve maternal cure without impairing fetal health, growth, and survival. Due to the rarity of this complication, there is limited data to guide clinical decision-making, especially regarding the safety of novel emerging therapies. Areas covered: The presented review describes the current practice of treatment for Hodgkin's (HL) and non-Hodgkin's (NHL) lymphoma in the pregnant patient, according to disease stage and trimester of pregnancy. Novel agents for treatment of lymphoma in the setting of pregnancy are discussed. Therapeutic dilemmas and areas of uncertainty are illuminated. Expert opinion: HL and NHL are potentially curable diseases in the pregnant patient with generally good outcomes for the mother and the offspring, when tailoring the treatment according to the individual patient. The complexity of the situation merits shared decision-making with the patient and her family, explicitly outlining the risks and benefits. The pregnant patient is best managed by a multidisciplinary team, familiar with the intricacies of the gestational period, and providing the necessary support and sensitivity. Further studies are needed regarding the safety of novel agents in pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Gurevich-Shapiro
- a Internal Medicine H , Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center , Tel Aviv , Israel.,b Division of Hematology , Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center , Tel Aviv , Israel.,c Sackler School of Medicine , Tel Aviv University , Ramat-Aviv , Israel
| | - Irit Avivi
- b Division of Hematology , Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center , Tel Aviv , Israel.,c Sackler School of Medicine , Tel Aviv University , Ramat-Aviv , Israel
| |
Collapse
|