1
|
Oliver A, Chandler E, Gillard JA. Impact of Digital Inclusion Initiative to Facilitate Access to Mental Health Services: Service User Interview Study. JMIR Ment Health 2024; 11:e51315. [PMID: 39058547 PMCID: PMC11316150 DOI: 10.2196/51315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 05/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital exclusion, characterized by a lack of access to digital technology, connectivity, or digital skills, disproportionally affects marginalized groups. An important domain impacted by digital exclusion is access to health care. During COVID-19, health care services had to restrict face-to-face contact to limit the spread of the virus. The subsequent shift toward remote delivery of mental health care exacerbated the digital divide, with limited access to remote mental health care delivery. In response, Camden and Islington National Health Service Foundation Trust launched the innovative Digital Inclusion Scheme (DIS). OBJECTIVE This study aimed to examine the impact of facilitating digital inclusion in mental health access. Camden and Islington National Health Service Foundation Trust implemented the trust-wide DIS for service users who were digitally excluded, that is, were without devices or connectivity or reported poor digital skills. The scheme provided access to a loan digital device (a tablet), internet connectivity devices, and mobile data, as well as personalized digital skills support. METHODS The DIS went live in October 2021 and received 106 referrals by June 2022. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 12 service users to ask about their experience of accessing the DIS. A thematic analysis identified themes and subthemes relating to the extent of their digital exclusion before engaging with the scheme and the impact of accessing a scheme on their ability to engage with digital technology and well-being. RESULTS There were 10 major themes. A total of 6 themes were related to factors impacting the engagement with the scheme, including digital exclusion, relationship to the trust, the importance of personalized digital support, partnership working, device usability and accessibility, and personal circumstances. The remaining 4 themes spoke to the impact of accessing the scheme, including improved access to services, impact on well-being, financial implications, and a greater sense of empowerment. CONCLUSIONS Participants reported an increased reliance on technology driving the need for digital inclusion; however, differences in motivation for engaging with the scheme were noted, as well as potential barriers, including lack of awareness, disability, and age. Overall, the experience of accessing the DIS was reported as positive, with participants feeling supported to access the digital world. The consequences of engaging with the scheme included greater perceived access to and control of physical and mental health care, improved well-being, and a greater sense of empowerment. An overview of the lessons learned are provided along with suggestions for other health care settings that are looking to implement similar schemes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Oliver
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ella Chandler
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Julia A Gillard
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- School of Psychology and Sport Science, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bird M, O'Neill E, Riches S. Digitally Enhanced Psychological Assessment and Treatment of Paranoia: A Systematic Review. Clin Psychol Psychother 2024; 31:e3019. [PMID: 38940680 DOI: 10.1002/cpp.3019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2024] [Revised: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Paranoia is relatively common but can lead to significant distress, impairment and need for care. Digital technologies offer a valuable extension to service provision and are increasingly being integrated into healthcare. This systematic review evaluated feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of digitally enhanced psychological assessments and treatments for paranoia across the paranoia continuum (PROSPERO: CRD42023393257). METHODS Databases PsychINFO, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Web of Science were searched until 12 June 2023; the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) quality assessment tool evaluated studies; and a narrative synthesis was conducted. RESULTS Twenty-seven studies met inclusion criteria (n = 3457, 23 assessment and 4 treatment, 2005-2023, most in Europe). Technologies included virtual reality (VR, n = 23), experience sampling methodology (ESM, n = 2), an app (n = 1) and a combination of VR and ESM (n = 1). Assessments involved monitoring paranoia under various virtual conditions or in everyday life. Treatments were generally integrated with Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT), which involved using VR to test out threat beliefs and drop safety behaviours or using an app to support slowing down paranoid thinking. EPHPP ratings were strong (n = 8), moderate (n = 12) and weak (n = 7). CONCLUSIONS Digitally enhanced assessments and treatments showed promising acceptability, feasibility and treatment effectiveness. Limitations of studies include small sample sizes, lack of comparison groups and long-term data and limited randomised controlled trials. Results support the potential future integration of VR in the assessment of paranoia and show promise for treatments such as CBT, although further clinical trials are required. Investigation of other technologies is limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly Bird
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- Psychology and Psychotherapy, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Emma O'Neill
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- Psychology and Psychotherapy, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Simon Riches
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- Psychology and Psychotherapy, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dennard S, Patel R, Garety P, Edwards C, Gumley A. A systematic review of users experiences of using digital interventions within psychosis: a thematic synthesis of qualitative research. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2024:10.1007/s00127-024-02692-4. [PMID: 38802509 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-024-02692-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although the development of digital mental health support for people with psychosis has been increasing, the development and opportunities to access this have been more limited compared to other mental health conditions. Qualitative research exploring the experiences of using digital interventions amongst people with psychosis is even less well developed; however, such research is crucial in capturing the experiences of using digital interventions to ensure they are meeting the needs of people with psychosis. This paper aimed to synthesise qualitative data related to the experiences of people with psychosis who have used digital interventions. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted of articles published between 1992 and October 2023 using PubMed, MBase, PsycINFO, & OVID Medline. Two reviewers independently reviewed and screened 268 papers. Papers that met inclusion criteria were quality assessed using The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) qualitative studies checklist. The Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) checklist was used to guide the structure of the report. RESULTS A thematic synthesis of 19 studies revealed six overarching themes which related to different aspects and features of the digital interventions: participants' relationship with technology; the accessibility of the interventions; how the interventions could impact on individuals' awareness and management of mental health; enhanced communication and relationships; and opportunities for reflection. CONCLUSIONS Benefits of using digital interventions are discussed. Areas for development and improvements are highlighted. Finally, recommendations for stakeholders who develop and implement digital interventions for psychosis are made.
Collapse
|
4
|
Allcock JA, Zhuang M, Li S, Zhao X. Landscape of Digital Technologies Used in the National Health Service in England: Content Analysis. JMIR Form Res 2024; 8:e51859. [PMID: 38639996 PMCID: PMC11069097 DOI: 10.2196/51859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In England, digital technologies are exploited to transform the way health and social care is provided and encompass a wide range of hardware devices and software that are used in all aspects of health care. However, little is known about the extent to which health care providers differ in digital health technology capabilities and how this relates to geographical and regional differences in health care capacities and resources. OBJECTIVE This paper aims to identify the set of digital technologies that have been deployed by the National Health Services clinical commissioning groups (NHS CCGs) in England. In doing this, we respond to calls to shed light on the internal dynamics and variation in the form of digital capability in England in terms of health service regional differences and health diversity, equity, and inclusion. METHODS We collected 135 annual reports that belong to 106 NHS CCGs in England, comprising more than 18,000 pages in total, released from 2020 to 2021. Using this data set, we identified 2163 pages related to digital technologies and labeled them using content analysis. We follow the construct taxonomy used by digital options theory, a theory from the management information systems field analyzing organizational resource investment choices, in classifying observed technologies according to digital themes-inherent design patterns that we identified and explained. We then used a hierarchical clustering method to extract groups of NHS CCGs that implement similar technology themes. RESULTS We found 31 technologies from the reports and grouped them into 9 digital themes. The 9 themes were further assigned to 1 of the 3 constructs of digital options theory, the identification of patients' requirements (we identified information portals [76/106], digital health engagement [67/106], and digital inclusion support [45/106]), the development of new work patterns (we identified telehealth [87/106], telemedicine [35/106], and care home technologies [40/106]), the realization of improvements in efficiency and public accessibility (we identified online booking [26/106], online triage [104/106], and digital mental health services [74/106]). The 3 clusters of CCGs are identified based on the 8 themes (Hopkins=0.9914, silhouette=0.186), namely (1) digitally disengaged, (2) digitally engaged, and (3) digital torchbearer. CONCLUSIONS Our findings show prominent digital themes within each construct group, namely information portals, telehealth, and online triage, covering people's fundamental health information needs. Almost half of CCGs fell into the digitally disengaged group, and all London CCGs (5/106) belonged to this group. We propose that practitioners should offer specialized assistance to regions with limited digital engagement, emphasizing digital health literacy, inclusion support, and ongoing evaluation, rather than concentrating solely on technical advancements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jake Alan Allcock
- Department of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Mengdie Zhuang
- Information School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Shuyang Li
- Business School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Xin Zhao
- Information School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wykes T, Simpson A, Guha M, Sweeney A, Bates A, Giacco D, Fulford D, Lincoln SH. Why did we reject your paper? J Ment Health 2024; 33:137-140. [PMID: 38804117 DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2024.2346482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Til Wykes
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alan Simpson
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Martin Guha
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Angela Sweeney
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Alison Bates
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Domenico Giacco
- Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Dan Fulford
- Sargent College of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kuhn R, Abdel-Halim N, Healey P, Bird V, Elliot K, McNamee P. Eliciting perspectives on remote healthcare delivery from service users with psychosis in the community: a cross-sectional survey study. Front Digit Health 2024; 6:1304456. [PMID: 38414715 PMCID: PMC10897019 DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1304456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction The transition towards remote healthcare has been rapidly accelerated in recent years due to a number of factors, including the COVID-19 pandemic, however, few studies have explored service users' views of remote mental healthcare, particularly in community mental health settings. Methods As part of a larger study concerned with the development of a remotely delivered psychosocial intervention, a survey was conducted with service users with psychosis (N = 200) from six NHS trusts across England to gain cross-sectional data about service users' opinions and attitudes towards remote interventions and explore how digital access varies across different demographic groups and geographical localities. Results The majority of service users had access to technological devices and a quiet space to receive care. Age was a key factor in motivation to engage with remote care as older participants had less access to technological devices and the internet, and reported less confidence to learn how to use new technologies compared to younger participants. Differences in access and attitudes towards remote care were found across the different geographical localities. Over half of the participants (53.1%) preferred a hybrid model (i.e., mixture of face-to-face and remotely delivered treatment), with only 4.5% preferring remote treatment exclusively. Factors that both encourage and deter service users from engaging with remote care were identified. Conclusions The findings of this study provide important information about the environmental and clinical barriers that prevent, or limit, the uptake of remotely delivered care for people with psychotic disorders. Although service users often have the ability and capacity to receive remote care, providers need to be cognisant of factors which may exacerbate digital exclusion and negatively impact the therapeutic alliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronja Kuhn
- Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Centre for Psychiatry & Mental Health, Wolfson Institute for Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nadia Abdel-Halim
- Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Patrick Healey
- School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Victoria Bird
- Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Centre for Psychiatry & Mental Health, Wolfson Institute for Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kathryn Elliot
- Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Centre for Psychiatry & Mental Health, Wolfson Institute for Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Philip McNamee
- Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Guest PC, Vasilevska V, Al-Hamadi A, Eder J, Falkai P, Steiner J. Digital technology and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a narrative review with a focus on depression, anxiety, stress, and trauma. Front Psychiatry 2023; 14:1227426. [PMID: 38188049 PMCID: PMC10766703 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1227426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
The sudden appearance and devastating effects of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the need for multiple adaptive changes in societies, business operations and healthcare systems across the world. This review describes the development and increased use of digital technologies such as chat bots, electronic diaries, online questionnaires and even video gameplay to maintain effective treatment standards for individuals with mental health conditions such as depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress syndrome. We describe how these approaches have been applied to help meet the challenges of the pandemic in delivering mental healthcare solutions. The main focus of this narrative review is on describing how these digital platforms have been used in diagnostics, patient monitoring and as a treatment option for the general public, as well as for frontline medical staff suffering with mental health issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul C. Guest
- Department of Psychiatry, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
- Laboratory of Translational Psychiatry, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
- Laboratory of Neuroproteomics, Department of Biochemistry and Tissue Biology, Institute of Biology University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil
| | - Veronika Vasilevska
- Department of Psychiatry, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
- Laboratory of Translational Psychiatry, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Ayoub Al-Hamadi
- Department of Neuro-Information Technology, Institute for Information Technology and Communications Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Julia Eder
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Falkai
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Johann Steiner
- Department of Psychiatry, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
- Laboratory of Translational Psychiatry, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
- Center for Health and Medical Prevention (CHaMP), Magdeburg, Germany
- German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Center for Intervention and Research on Adaptive and Maladaptive Brain Circuits Underlying Mental Health (C-I-R-C), Halle-Jena-Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
- Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences (CBBS), Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Eisner E, Berry N, Bucci S. Digital tools to support mental health: a survey study in psychosis. BMC Psychiatry 2023; 23:726. [PMID: 37803367 PMCID: PMC10559432 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-05114-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a notable a gap between promising research findings and implementation of digital health tools. Understanding and addressing barriers to use is key to widespread implementation. METHODS A survey was administered to a self-selecting sample in-person (n = 157) or online (n = 58), with questions examining: i) ownership and usage rates of digital devices among people with psychosis; ii) interest in using technology to engage with mental health services; and iii) facilitators of and barriers to using digital tools in a mental healthcare context. RESULTS Device ownership: Virtually all participants owned a mobile phone (95%) or smartphone (90%), with Android phones slightly more prevalent than iPhones. Only a minority owned a fitness tracker (15%) or smartwatch (13%). Device ownership was significantly lower in unemployed people and those without secondary education. Device cost and paranoid ideation were barriers to ownership. Technology and mental health services: Most participants (88%) said they would willingly try a mental health app. Symptom monitoring apps were most popular, then appointment reminders and medication reminders. Half the sample would prefer an app alongside face-to-face support; the other half preferred remote support or no other mental health support. Facilitators: Participants thought using a mental health app could increase their understanding of psychosis generally, and of their own symptoms. They valued the flexibility of digital tools in enabling access to support anywhere, anytime. Barriers: Prominent barriers to using mental health apps were forgetting, lack of motivation, security concerns, and concerns it would replace face-to-face care. Overall participants reported no substantial effects of technology on their mental health, although a quarter said using a phone worsened paranoid ideation. A third used technology more when psychotic symptoms were higher, whereas a third used it less. Around half used technology more when experiencing low mood. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest rapidly increasing device ownership among people with psychosis, mirroring patterns in the general population. Smartphones appear appropriate for delivering internet-enabled support for psychosis. However, for a sub-group of people with psychosis, the sometimes complex interaction between technology and mental health may act as a barrier to engagement, alongside more prosaic factors such as forgetting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Eisner
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, 2nd Floor Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Natalie Berry
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, 2nd Floor Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Sandra Bucci
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, 2nd Floor Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Petrou C, Jameel L, Nahabedian N, Kane F. A call for digital inclusion initiatives in mental health services: An integrative review. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2023; 30:911-941. [PMID: 37022715 DOI: 10.1111/jpm.12931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 03/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: Digital tools such as video calls or mobile phone applications (apps) are increasingly used in the provision of mental healthcare. There is evidence that people with mental health problems are more likely to face digital exclusion: that is, they do not have access to devices and/or skills to use technology. This leaves some people unable to use digital mental health services (e.g., apps or online appointments) or to benefit more generally from access to the digital world (e.g., online shopping or connecting with others virtually). People can be digitally included through initiatives that provide devices, Internet and digital mentoring to increase knowledge and confidence when using technology. WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: Some initiatives in academic studies and grey literature have been shown to increase access to and knowledge of technology, but this has been outside of mental health care settings. There are currently limited digital inclusion initiatives that take into consideration the specific needs of people with mental health problems, and how they can be equipped and familiarised with digital technologies to help their recovery journey and everyday life activities. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Further work is needed to improve the provision of digital tools in mental health care, with more practical digital inclusion initiatives to ensure equal access for all. If digital exclusion is not addressed, the gap between people with and those without digital skills or access to technology will continue to grow, enlarging mental health inequalities. ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION: The rise in the provision of digital healthcare during the pandemic has called attention to digital exclusion: inequality in access and/or capacity to use digital technologies. Digital exclusion is more profound in people with mental health problems, leaving an implementation gap of digital practice in mental health services. AIM Identify the available evidence of (a) addressing digital exclusion in mental health care and (b) the practical solutions to enhance uptake of digital mental health. METHOD Digital inclusion initiatives were searched from both academic and grey literature available and published between the years 2007 and 2021. RESULTS A limited number of academic studies and initiatives were found that supported people with mental health difficulties who had limited skills and/or access to overcome digital exclusion. DISCUSSION Further work is needed to combat digital exclusion and establish ways to reduce the implementation gap in mental health services. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Access to devices, Internet connectivity and digital mentoring for mental health service users is essential. More studies and programmes are needed to disseminate impact and results for digital inclusion initiatives for people with mental health problems and to inform best practice for digital inclusion within mental health services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Leila Jameel
- Clinical Psychologist at South London and Maudsley NHS, London, UK
| | - Noushig Nahabedian
- Head of Quality Improvement at South London and Maudsley NHS, London, UK
| | - Fergus Kane
- Principal Clinical Psychologist at South London and Maudsley NHS, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hayward M, Berry K, Bremner S, Cavanagh K, Dodgson G, Fowler D, Gage H, Greenwood K, Hazell C, Bibby-Jones AM, Robertson S, Touray M, Dailey N, Strauss C. Increasing access to CBT for psychosis patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating brief, targeted CBT for distressing voices delivered by assistant psychologists (GiVE3). Trials 2023; 24:588. [PMID: 37715255 PMCID: PMC10503006 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07611-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends that cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) is offered to all patients with a psychosis diagnosis. However, only a minority of psychosis patients in England and Wales are offered CBT. This is attributable, in part, to the resource-intensive nature of CBT. One response to this problem has been the development of CBT in brief formats that are targeted at a single symptom and are deliverable by briefly trained therapists. We have developed Guided self-help CBT (the GiVE intervention) as a brief form of CBT for distressing voices and reported evidence for the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) when the intervention was delivered by briefly trained therapists (assistant psychologists). This study will investigate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the GiVE intervention when delivered by assistant psychologists following a brief training. METHODS This study is a pragmatic, two-arm, parallel group, superiority RCT comparing the GiVE intervention (delivered by assistant psychologists) and treatment as usual to treatment as usual alone, recruiting across three sites, using 1:1 allocation and blind post-treatment and follow-up assessments. A nested qualitative study will develop a model for implementation. DISCUSSION If the GiVE intervention is found to be effective when delivered by assistant psychologists, this intervention could significantly contribute to increasing access to evidence-based psychological interventions for psychosis patients. Furthermore, implementation across secondary care services within the UK's National Health Service may pave the way for other symptom-specific and less resource-intensive CBT-informed interventions for psychosis patients to be developed and evaluated. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN registration number: 12748453. Registered on 28 September 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Hayward
- School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9RH, UK.
- Research and Development Department, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hove, BN3 7HZ, UK.
| | - Katherine Berry
- Faculty of Biology, University of Manchester, Medicine & Health, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Stephen Bremner
- Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9RH, UK
| | - Kate Cavanagh
- School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9RH, UK
| | - Guy Dodgson
- Department of Psychology, University of Durham, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK
| | - David Fowler
- School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9RH, UK
| | - Heather Gage
- School of Biosciences & Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK
| | | | - Cassie Hazell
- School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7HX, UK
| | - Anna-Marie Bibby-Jones
- Research and Development Department, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hove, BN3 7HZ, UK
| | - Sam Robertson
- Research and Development Department, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hove, BN3 7HZ, UK
| | - Morro Touray
- School of Biosciences & Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK
| | - Natalie Dailey
- Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9RH, UK
| | - Clara Strauss
- School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9RH, UK
- Research and Development Department, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Hove, BN3 7HZ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
O’Sullivan K, Downes C, Monahan M, Morrissey J, Byrne G, Farrell G, Gibbons P, Higgins A. Operationalising a Recovery-Oriented Support and Information Programme Online: The EOLAS Programme. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:4417. [PMID: 36901424 PMCID: PMC10002363 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20054417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Evidence demonstrates that psychoeducation interventions have clinical and recovery-related benefits for people experiencing psychosis and their family members. The EOLAS programmes are one example of recovery-oriented psychoeducation programmes for psychosis. They differ from other programmes in that they are co-designed and co-facilitated (peer and clinician) group programmes. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, EOLAS went online using a videoconferencing platform. The study examined the feasibility, acceptability and usefulness of EOLAS-Online and explored whether some of the positive recovery outcomes reported by attendees regarding the in-person programmes were replicated online. Data were collected through an online survey and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Thematic analysis was used for qualitative data. Fifteen attendees (40% of attendees) completed the surveys and eight participated in interviews. A total of 80% were satisfied/very satisfied with the programme. The programme was rated highly for increased knowledge of mental health, coping strategies, and engaging with peers. The use of technology was mostly unproblematic, although some audio and video-related challenges were identified. Engaging with the online programme was experienced positively, including facilitator support to engage. The overall findings indicate that EOLAS-Online is feasible, acceptable and useful in supporting attendees' recovery journeys.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin O’Sullivan
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, D02 T283 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Carmel Downes
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, D02 T283 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Mark Monahan
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, D02 T283 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jean Morrissey
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, D02 T283 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Gobnait Byrne
- Trinity Centre for Practice and Healthcare Innovation, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, D02 T283 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Gerard Farrell
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, D02 T283 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Patrick Gibbons
- Kildare/West Wicklow Mental Health Service, Lakeview Unit, Naas Hospital, Craddockstown Rd., Naas, W91 AE76 Kildare, Ireland
| | - Agnes Higgins
- Trinity Centre for Practice and Healthcare Innovation, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, D02 T283 Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wykes T, Guha M. Modern media and mental health: help or hindrance? J Ment Health 2022; 31:735-737. [PMID: 36660962 DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2022.2143488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Martin Guha
- Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Schlief M, Saunders KRK, Appleton R, Barnett P, Vera San Juan N, Foye U, Olive RR, Machin K, Shah P, Chipp B, Lyons N, Tamworth C, Persaud K, Badhan M, Black CA, Sin J, Riches S, Graham T, Greening J, Pirani F, Griffiths R, Jeynes T, McCabe R, Lloyd-Evans B, Simpson A, Needle JJ, Trevillion K, Johnson S. Synthesis of the Evidence on What Works for Whom in Telemental Health: Rapid Realist Review. Interact J Med Res 2022; 11:e38239. [PMID: 35767691 PMCID: PMC9524537 DOI: 10.2196/38239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Telemental health (delivering mental health care via video calls, telephone calls, or SMS text messages) is becoming increasingly widespread. Telemental health appears to be useful and effective in providing care to some service users in some settings, especially during an emergency restricting face-to-face contact, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. However, important limitations have been reported, and telemental health implementation risks the reinforcement of pre-existing inequalities in service provision. If it is to be widely incorporated into routine care, a clear understanding is needed of when and for whom it is an acceptable and effective approach and when face-to-face care is needed. OBJECTIVE This rapid realist review aims to develop a theory about which telemental health approaches work (or do not work), for whom, in which contexts, and through what mechanisms. METHODS Rapid realist reviewing involves synthesizing relevant evidence and stakeholder expertise to allow timely development of context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) configurations in areas where evidence is urgently needed to inform policy and practice. The CMO configurations encapsulate theories about what works for whom and by what mechanisms. Sources included eligible papers from 2 previous systematic reviews conducted by our team on telemental health; an updated search using the strategy from these reviews; a call for relevant evidence, including "gray literature," to the public and key experts; and website searches of relevant voluntary and statutory organizations. CMO configurations formulated from these sources were iteratively refined, including through discussions with an expert reference group, including researchers with relevant lived experience and frontline clinicians, and consultation with experts focused on three priority groups: children and young people, users of inpatient and crisis care services, and digitally excluded groups. RESULTS A total of 108 scientific and gray literature sources were included. From our initial CMO configurations, we derived 30 overarching CMO configurations within four domains: connecting effectively; flexibility and personalization; safety, privacy, and confidentiality; and therapeutic quality and relationship. Reports and stakeholder input emphasized the importance of personal choice, privacy and safety, and therapeutic relationships in telemental health care. The review also identified particular service users likely to be disadvantaged by telemental health implementation and a need to ensure that face-to-face care of equivalent timeliness remains available. Mechanisms underlying the successful and unsuccessful application of telemental health are discussed. CONCLUSIONS Service user choice, privacy and safety, the ability to connect effectively, and fostering strong therapeutic relationships need to be prioritized in delivering telemental health care. Guidelines and strategies coproduced with service users and frontline staff are needed to optimize telemental health implementation in real-world settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO); CRD42021260910; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021260910.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merle Schlief
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Katherine R K Saunders
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca Appleton
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Phoebe Barnett
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Norha Vera San Juan
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Una Foye
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Rowan Olive
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit Lived Experience Working Group, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Karen Machin
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit Lived Experience Working Group, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Prisha Shah
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit Lived Experience Working Group, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Beverley Chipp
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit Lived Experience Working Group, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Natasha Lyons
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Camilla Tamworth
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Karen Persaud
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit Lived Experience Working Group, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Monika Badhan
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Carrie-Ann Black
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jacqueline Sin
- Centre for Mental Health Research, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Riches
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- Social, Genetic & Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tom Graham
- Centre for Anxiety Disorders & Trauma, South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jeremy Greening
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Farida Pirani
- Psychological Medicine & Older Adult Directorate, South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Raza Griffiths
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit Lived Experience Working Group, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tamar Jeynes
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit Lived Experience Working Group, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rose McCabe
- Centre for Mental Health Research, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Brynmor Lloyd-Evans
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alan Simpson
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Justin J Needle
- Centre for Health Services Research, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kylee Trevillion
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sonia Johnson
- NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lal S, Abdel-Baki A, Lee H. Telepsychiatry services during COVID-19: A cross-sectional survey on the experiences and perspectives of young adults with first-episode psychosis. Early Interv Psychiatry 2022; 17:368-377. [PMID: 35731034 PMCID: PMC9350121 DOI: 10.1111/eip.13332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Limited evidence exists on the implementation of telepsychiatry within the context of early intervention services for psychosis, the need for which has become even more relevant during the COVID-19 pandemic. To address this gap, we investigated the experiences and perspectives of young adults recovering from a first-episode psychosis (FEP) following their use of telepsychiatry services (i.e. use of video conferencing technology to deliver mental health services to patients in real time). METHODS A cross-sectional online survey study was implemented between November 19th , 2020 and March 9th , 2021 with young adults recruited from a specialized program for FEP located in an urban Canadian setting. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, exploratory (Fisher's exact test), and content analysis. RESULTS Among 51 participants (mean age = 26.0, SD = 4.7; 56.9% female), the majority were satisfied with the service (91%, 46/51), perceived that the platform was easy to use (90%, 46/51) and felt secure in terms of confidentiality (82%, 42/51). Satisfaction was related to perceptions regarding ease of use, image quality, and employment/studying status. Several partially or totally agreed that the presence of a third party was essential to login during the first few sessions (35%, 18/51), and some needed technical support (24%, 12/51) throughout the sessions. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that telepsychiatry is feasible and acceptable to implement for patients in the early phase of psychosis recovery. It also highlights the importance of making technical support available, especially in the first few times of using the service, and addressing patient concerns regarding confidentiality, even when using secured health technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shalini Lal
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.,Youth Mental Health and Technology Lab, Health Innovation and Evaluation Hub, University of Montréal Hospital Research Centre, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.,Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis (PEPP-Montreal), Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.,ACCESS Open Minds, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Amal Abdel-Baki
- Department of Psychiatry, Centre Hospitalier Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Axe Neurosciences, University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Hajin Lee
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.,Youth Mental Health and Technology Lab, Health Innovation and Evaluation Hub, University of Montréal Hospital Research Centre, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fulford D, Schupbach E, Gard DE, Mueser KT, Mow J, Leung L. Do cognitive impairments limit treatment gains in a standalone digital intervention for psychosis? A test of the digital divide. Schizophr Res Cogn 2022; 28:100244. [PMID: 35242612 PMCID: PMC8881658 DOI: 10.1016/j.scog.2022.100244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Digital mental health interventions, such as those provided by smartphone applications (apps), show promise as cost-effective approaches to increasing access to evidence-based psychosocial interventions for psychosis. Although it is well known that limited financial resources can reduce the benefits of digital approaches to mental healthcare, the extent to which cognitive functioning in this population could impact capacity to engage in and benefit from these interventions is less studied. In the current study we examined the extent to which cognitive functioning (premorbid cognitive abilities and social cognition) were related to treatment engagement and outcome in a standalone digital intervention for social functioning. Premorbid cognitive abilities generally showed no association with aggregated treatment engagement markers, including proportion of notifications responded to and degree of interest in working on app content, though there was a small positive association with improvements in social functioning. Social cognition, as measured using facial affect recognition ability, was unrelated to treatment engagement or outcome. These preliminary findings suggest that cognitive functioning is generally not associated with engagement or outcomes in a standalone digital intervention designed for and with people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.
Collapse
|
16
|
Wykes T, Mueser K, Penn D, Sweeney A, Simpson A, Giacco D. Research and mental health during COVID-19-advice and some requests. J Ment Health 2022; 30:663-666. [PMID: 35023802 DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2021.2015063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Til Wykes
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Kim Mueser
- Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Boston University, Brookline, MA, USA
| | - David Penn
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Angela Sweeney
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Alan Simpson
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hardy A, Ward T, Emsley R, Greenwood K, Freeman D, Fowler D, Kuipers E, Bebbington P, Garety P. Bridging the ‘digital divide’ in psychological therapies: Engagement with the SlowMo mobile app for paranoia in psychosis (Preprint). JMIR Hum Factors 2021; 9:e29725. [PMID: 35776506 PMCID: PMC9288106 DOI: 10.2196/29725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Marginalized groups are more likely to experience problems with technology-related access, motivation, and skills. This is known as the “digital divide.” Technology-related exclusion is a potential barrier to the equitable implementation of digital health. SlowMo therapy was developed with an inclusive, human-centered design to optimize accessibility and bridge the “digital divide.” SlowMo is an effective, blended digital psychological therapy for paranoia in psychosis. Objective This study explores the “digital divide” and mobile app engagement in the SlowMo randomized controlled trial. Methods Digital literacy was assessed at baseline, and a multidimensional assessment of engagement (ie, adherence [via system analytics and self-report] and self-reported user experience) was conducted at 12 weeks after therapy. Engagement was investigated in relation to demographics (ie, gender, age, ethnicity, and paranoia severity). Results Digital literacy data demonstrated that technology use and confidence were lower in Black people and older people (n=168). The engagement findings indicated that 80.7% (96/119) of therapy completers met the a priori analytics adherence criteria. However, analytics adherence did not differ by demographics. High rates of user experience were reported overall (overall score: mean 75%, SD 17.1%; n=82). No differences in user experience were found for ethnicity, age, or paranoia severity, although self-reported app use, enjoyment, and usefulness were higher in women than in men. Conclusions This study identified technology-related inequalities related to age and ethnicity, which did not influence engagement with SlowMo, suggesting that the therapy design bridged the “digital divide.” Intervention design may moderate the influence of individual differences on engagement. We recommend the adoption of inclusive, human-centered design to reduce the impact of the “digital divide” on therapy outcomes. Trial Registration ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN32448671; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN32448671
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Hardy
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- South London & Maudsley National Health Services Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Ward
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- South London & Maudsley National Health Services Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Emsley
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kathryn Greenwood
- Department of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Freeman
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - David Fowler
- Department of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Elizabeth Kuipers
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Bebbington
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Philippa Garety
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- South London & Maudsley National Health Services Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|