Targeting the PI3K pathway in myeloproliferative neoplasms

Emerging drug profile: JAK inhibitors

Dysregulated JAK/STAT hyperactivity is essential to the pathogenesis of myelofibrosis, and JAK inhibitors are the first-line treatment option for many patients. There are four FDA-approved JAK inhibitors for patients with myelofibrosis. Single-agent JAK inhibition can improve splenomegaly, symptom burden, cytopenias, and possibly survival in patients with myelofibrosis. Despite their efficacy, JAK inhibitors produce variable or short-lived responses, in part due to the large network of cooperating signaling pathways and downstream targets of JAK/STAT, which mediates upfront or acquired resistance to JAK inhibitors. Synergistic inhibition of JAK/STAT accessory pathways can increase the rates and duration of response for patients with myelofibrosis. Two recently reported, placebo-controlled phase III trials of novel agents added to JAK inhibition met their primary endpoint, and additional late-stage studies are ongoing. This paper will review role of dysregulated JAK/STAT signaling, biological plausible additional therapeutic targets and the recent advancements in combination strategies with JAK inhibitors for myelofibrosis.

Evaluation of the cardiac safety of parsaclisib, a selective PI3Kδ inhibitor, in patients with previously treated B-cell malignancies: Results from the CITADEL-101 study

Parsaclisib, a potent and selective phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase δ inhibitor, has been investigated for the treatment of B-cell malignancies and studied in patients with autoimmune diseases and myelofibrosis. The CITADEL-101 study (NCT02018861) assessed safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of parsaclisib in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma. This study evaluated the cardiac safety of parsaclisib as monotherapy based on data from 72 patients enrolled in the CITADEL-101 study. Time-matched pharmacokinetic and ECG measurements were collected at specified times for 69 patients receiving monotherapy in doses of 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 45 mg once daily. Based on the categorical outlier analysis, no dose-dependent effect was observed on the incidence of outliers in QT interval corrected for heart rate (HR) by Fridericia's method (QTcF), HR, or cardiac conduction. Based on central tendency analysis, the least square means (LSMs) (90% confidence interval [CI]) of ΔQTcF from the central tendency analysis ranged from -6.83 (-18.8 to 5.19) to 4.75 ms (0.410-9.09) across dose groups (below 20 ms, the threshold of large QT effects) and was not considered dose dependent. Moreover, the LSMs of ΔHR, ΔPR interval, and ΔQRS interval were minor. From the concentration-ΔQTcF analyses, the predicted ΔQTcF (90% CI) for all dose levels was between 0.365 (-1.75 to 2.48) and 7.87 ms (0.921-14.8), with the highest upper limit of CIs well below 20 ms, and therefore, a large QT/QTc effect was ruled out up to the highest dose level (45 mg) investigated. Overall, parsaclisib at the dose ranges studied did not reveal concentration-dependent effects on change in QTcF and did not have a significant effect on HR or cardiac conduction.

Phase 2 study of add-on parsaclisib for patients with myelofibrosis and suboptimal response to ruxolitinib: final results

ABSTRACT

Ruxolitinib reduces spleen volume, improves symptoms, and increases survival in patients with intermediate- or high-risk myelofibrosis. However, suboptimal response may occur, potentially because of signaling via the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B pathway. This phase 2 study evaluated dosing, efficacy, and safety of add-on PI3Kδ inhibitor parsaclisib for patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis with suboptimal response to ruxolitinib. Eligible patients remained on a stable ruxolitinib dose and received add-on parsaclisib 10 or 20 mg, once daily for 8 weeks, and once weekly thereafter (daily-to-weekly dosing; n = 32); or parsaclisib 5 or 20 mg, once daily for 8 weeks, then 5 mg once daily thereafter (all-daily dosing; n = 42). Proportion of patients achieving a ≥10% decrease in spleen volume at 12 weeks was 28% for daily-to-weekly dosing and 59.5% for all-daily dosing. Proportions of patients achieving ≥50% decrease at week 12 in Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form and Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Symptom Assessment Form symptom scores were 14% and 18% for daily-to-weekly dosing, and 28% and 32% for all-daily dosing, respectively. Most common nonhematologic treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea (23%), diarrhea (22%), abdominal pain and fatigue (each 19%), and cough and dyspnea (each 18%). New-onset grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia were observed in 19% of patients, each dosed daily-to-weekly, and in 26% and 7% of patients dosed all-daily, respectively, managed with dose interruptions. Hemoglobin levels remained steady. The addition of parsaclisib to stable-dose ruxolitinib can reduce splenomegaly and improve symptoms, with manageable toxicity in patients with myelofibrosis with suboptimal response to ruxolitinib. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02718300.

The pharmacotherapeutic management of patients with myelofibrosis: looking beyond JAK inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

The approach to myelofibrosis (MF) has been revolutionized in recent years, overcoming the traditional therapies, often not very effective. Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi - from ruxolitinib up to momelotinib) were the first class of drugs with considerable results.

AREAS COVERED

Ongoing, new molecules are being tested that promise to give hope even to those patients not eligible for bone marrow transplants who become intolerant or are refractory to JAKi, for which therapeutic hopes are currently limited. Telomerase, murine double minute 2 (MDM2), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase δ (PI3Kδ), BCL-2/xL, and bromodomain and extra-terminal motif (BET) inhibitors are the drugs with promising results in clinical trials and close to closure with consequent placing on the market, finally allowing JAK to look beyond. The novelty of the MF field was searched in the PubMed database, and the recently completed/ongoing trials are extrapolated from the ClinicalTrial website.

EXPERT OPINION

From this point of view, the use of new molecules widely described in this review, probably in association with JAKi, will represent the future treatment of choice in MF, leaving, in any case, the potential new approaches actually in an early stage of development, such as the use of immunotherapy in targeting CALR, which is coming soon.

MAPK-negative feedback regulation confers dependence to JAK2V617F signaling

Despite significant advances in developing selective JAK2 inhibitors, JAK2 kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy is ineffective in suppressing the disease. Reactivation of compensatory MEK-ERK and PI3K survival pathways sustained by inflammatory cytokine signaling causes treatment failure. Concomitant inhibition of MAPK pathway and JAK2 signaling showed improved in vivo efficacy compared to JAK2 inhibition alone but lacked clonal selectivity. We hypothesized that cytokine signaling in JAK2V617F induced MPNs increases the apoptotic threshold that causes TKI persistence or refractoriness. Here, we show that JAK2V617F and cytokine signaling converge to induce MAPK negative regulator, DUSP1. Enhanced DUSP1 expression blocks p38 mediated p53 stabilization. Deletion of Dusp1 increases p53 levels in the context of JAK2V617F signaling that causes synthetic lethality to Jak2V617F expressing cells. However, inhibition of Dusp1 by a small molecule inhibitor (BCI) failed to impart Jak2V617F clonal selectivity due to pErk1/2 rebound caused by off-target inhibition of Dusp6. Ectopic expression of Dusp6 and BCI treatment restored clonal selectively and eradicated the Jak2V617F cells. Our study shows that inflammatory cytokines and JAK2V617F signaling converge to induce DUSP1, which downregulates p53 and establishes a higher apoptotic threshold. These data suggest that selectively targeting DUSP1 may provide a curative response in JAK2V617F-driven MPN.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Novel Therapeutic Strategies in Development for Myelofibrosis

Development of myelofibrosis (MF) therapeutics has reached fruition as the transformative impact of JAK2 inhibitors in the MPN landscape is complemented/expanded by a profusion of novel monotherapies and rational combinations in the frontline and second line settings. Agents in advanced clinical development span various mechanisms of action (eg, epigenetic or apoptotic regulation), may address urgent unmet clinical needs (cytopenias), increase the depth/duration of spleen and symptom responses elicited by ruxolitinib, improve other aspects of the disease besides splenomegaly/constitutional symptoms (eg, resistance to ruxolitinib, bone marrow fibrosis or disease course), provide personalized strategies, and extend overall survival (OS). Ruxolitinib had a dramatic impact on the quality of life and OS of MF patients. Recently, pacritinib received regulatory approval for severely thrombocytopenic MF patients. Momelotinib is advantageously poised among JAK inhibitors given its differentiated mode of action (suppression of hepcidin expression). Momelotinib demonstrated significant improvements in anemia measures, spleen responses, and MF-associated symptoms in MF patients with anemia; and will likely receive regulatory approval in 2023. An array of other novel agents combined with ruxolitinib, such as pelabresib, navitoclax, parsaclisib, or as monotherapies (navtemadlin) are evaluated in pivotal phase 3 trials. Imetelstat (telomerase inhibitor) is currently evaluated in the second line setting; OS was set as the primary endpoint, marking an unprecedented goal in MF trials, wherein SVR35 and TSS50 at 24 weeks have been typical endpoints heretofore. Transfusion independence may be considered another clinically meaningful endpoint in MF trials given its correlation with OS. Overall, therapeutics are at the cusp of an exponential expansion and advancements that will likely lead to the golden era in treatment of MF.

Targeted Therapy for MPNs: Going Beyond JAK Inhibitors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

JAK inhibition is an effective means of controlling symptom burden and improving splenomegaly in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). However, a majority of patients treated with JAK inhibition will have disease progression with long-term use. In In this review, we focus on the investigation of novel targeted agents beyond JAK inhibitors both in the chronic phase of disease and in the accelerated/blast phase of disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Relevant targeted therapies in MPNs include BET inhibitors, BCL inhibitors, LSD1 inhibitors, PI3K inhibitors, IDH inhibitors, telomerase inhibitors, and MDM2 inhibitor. Agents within these classes have been investigated either as monotherapy or in combination with a JAK inhibitor. We summarize the prospective data for these agents along with detailing the ongoing phase III trials incorporating these agents. While JAK inhibition has been a mainstay of therapy in MPNs, a majority of patients will have disease of progression. JAK inhibitors also have limited anti-clonal effect and do not impact the rate of progression to the blast phase of disease. The novel therapies detailed in this review not only show promise in ameliorating the symptom burden of MPNs but may be able to alter the natural history of disease.