Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy and Ileal Neobladder for Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer in Combination with One Stage Prophylactic Laparoscopic Sacrospinal Fixation to Avoid Future Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Functional Outcomes of Orthotopic Neobladder in Women

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review paper summarizes the available literature on the evolution of surgical approach to radical cystectomy in female bladder cancer patients and its impact on functional outcomes in orthotopic neobladder.

RECENT FINDINGS

Traditionally, radical cystectomy in female bladder cancer patients has been maximally extirpative with pelvic exenteration. Recently, new techniques which include pelvic organ-sparing, nerve-sparing and vaginal-sparing have demonstrated improved rates of urinary incontinence and retention. Additional techniques include prophylactic apical suspension which reduces the likelihood of pelvic organ prolapse, a risk factor for voiding dysfunction in the setting of orthotopic neobladder. Surgical management of bladder cancer in female patients has evolved to include surgical approaches which center quality of life and functional outcomes that are unique to female patients who have undergone radical cystectomy with ileal neobladder and can be optimized based on considerations regarding an approach that limits pelvic floor and pelvic nerve disruption.

Radical cystectomy in the female patient: The pelvic floor, sexual function, and patient/provider education

Radical cystectomy in women results in numerous deleterious anatomic impacts to the pelvic floor that can result in sexual dysfunction, pelvic organ prolapse, and other disorders of pelvic floor function. A comprehensive understanding of this relationship and the quality-of-life impacts of radical cystectomy in women is important. This narrative review provides an overview of female pelvic floor disorders in the setting of radical cystectomy, with focus on present understanding of related anatomy, incidence, and prevention strategies, as well as the importance of both provider and patient education.

Surgeon Attitudes Toward Concurrent Urogynecologic and Gynecologic Oncology Procedures: A Cross-sectional Survey

IMPORTANCE

There is increasing overlap in the urogynecologic and gynecologic oncologic patient populations. To improve patient advocacy and access to care, a collaborative surgical approach may benefit this cohort.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate surgeon attitudes toward performing concurrent urogynecologic and gynecologic oncology procedures. We hypothesized that most surgeons are amenable to collaboration.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire of members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology and the American Urogynecologic Society from August to November 2020. A 23-item online survey was created to assess surgeon demographics, practice and screening patterns, and attitudes toward surgical collaboration. We also evaluated obstacles to performing joint procedures and assessed whether attitudes could be influenced by new information.

RESULTS

A total of 338 surveys were included in the analysis, including 158 urogynecologists and 226 gynecologic oncologists (GOs). Most surgeons (77.8%) will recommend concurrent procedures with another specialty, and 97.8% of urogynecologists and 95.7% of oncologists currently perform joint surgical procedures. Male surgeons, regardless of specialty, were more likely to recommend staged procedures (44% vs 31%, P < 0.001), as were GOs (28% vs 10.1%, P < 0.001). However, oncologists were more likely than urogynecologists to initiate referrals for surgical collaboration (33.3% vs 14.4%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A total of 22.2% of urogynecologists and oncologists prefer staging surgical procedures. The most common barrier to a combined procedure was logistics. Urogynecologists were more concerned about the effects of cancer treatments on healing, the use of mesh implants, and financial reimbursements as compared with GOs. Treatment delay was a significantly greater concern for the oncologists.

Post-cystectomy Enterocele: A Case Series and Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVE

To present a case series and literature review on post radical cystectomy (RC) pelvic organ prolapse (POP) to heighten awareness of the symptoms, imaging findings, and risk factors associated with this complication and discuss opportunities for prevention. Women with muscle invasive bladder cancer undergo RC with anterior exenteration, significantly disrupting the pelvic floor. These women are at risk for POP.

METHODS

We present 4 cases of high-grade POP in women who underwent RC for bladder cancer. We reviewed the literature by conducting a Boolean search in PubMed with the terms "("radical cystectomy") AND ("enterocele" OR "pelvic organ prolapse" OR "rectocele" OR "vaginal vault prolapse")."

RESULTS

All 4 women reported a bulge sensation in the vagina and physical exam confirmed POP. Three had radiographic findings consistent with high-grade enterocele at rest. Three experienced prolonged intra-abdominal pressure rise post-RC that may have further weakened pelvic floor support, while the fourth had a history of surgery for high-grade POP. Nine articles on POP following RC were identified. Four focused on treatment and 3 focused on prevention.

CONCLUSION

Administration of a single validated question would have identified all 4 cases of postoperative enterocele and is sensitive to detect most women who are experiencing POP. Attention to the pelvic floor on cross-sectional imaging with identification of features that indicate POP, such as herniation of intestinal contents below the pubo-coccygeal line, will identify and/or confirm high-grade enterocele. Familiarity with risk factors for POP and identification of weakened vaginal wall support opens up the opportunity for prevention.

Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse After Radical Cystectomy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article explores the anatomy, management options, and outcomes of pelvic organ prolapse with a female cystectomy patient.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is a lack of data on surgical management outcomes for prolapse following radical cystectomy. However, most case series from tertiary referral centers show reasonable results irrespective of route of repair. As expected, the surgical planes and the reorientation of the bowel loop for urinary diversion makes any pelvic reconstruction a potential hazard and requires a high level of expertise and counseling to the patient in regard to the management of expectations. Pelvic organ prolapse following radical cystectomy is uncommon but presents a significant challenge to the reconstructive surgeon.

[Old wine in new bottles-proven open-surgical procedures for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse]

Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) are increasing due to demographic factors. Increasing life expectancy and sociocultural demands of women require successful treatments that also have low complication rates. Classic open procedures such as colposuspension or colposacropexy (native tissue repair as well as mesh procedures) are experiencing a renaissance due to the current critical view of mesh-repair pelvic floor surgery and continue to be of great importance. With suitable patient selection, long-term results of abdominal procedures are on a par with minimally invasive techniques. Cosmetically acceptable results can be achieved with optimized incisions. The therapeutically relevant target for apical fixation is the elevation angle of the vagina (EAV). Minimally invasive mesh-based primary reconstructions and interventions for POP recurrence proved to be superior to conventional procedures due to good long-term results, lower recurrence rates and reduced early and late complication rates when anatomically correct and gentle surgery is performed with a critical selection of textile implants. Abdominal procedures are not inferior to minimally invasive techniques when instrumental suturing techniques and modern instruments are used. Adequate and critical information about surgical options and possible risks of complications should be provided in a timely manner. Education and training in modern diagnostics as well as in abdominal and current minimally invasive techniques and complication management should be implemented according to the guidelines and recommendations of professional societies, the Food and Drug Administration and the European Network of Information Centres.

Treatment of Pelvic Floor Disorders Following Neobladder

Radical cystectomy remains the gold standard treatment for organ-confined high-grade recurrent or muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Orthotopic neobladder urinary diversion following cystectomy represents an option for patients wishing for continent urinary diversion. Female patients who undergo radical cystectomy with orthotopic bladder substitution are at risk for developing both common and neobladder-specific disorders of the pelvic floor, including urinary incontinence, hypercontinence, vaginal prolapse, and neobladder-vaginal fistula. Each of these sequelae can have significant impact on the patient's quality of life. Due to the increased frequency of orthotopic neobladder creation in women, subspecialty urologists are more likely to confront such pelvic floor disorders in bladder cancer survivors. This review presents the most current information on the treatment of pelvic floor disorders after orthotopic bladder substitution.