Hospitalized Women Experiencing an Episode of Excessive Oral Anticoagulation Had a Higher Bleeding Risk Than Men

Impact of social determinants of health on anticoagulant use among patients with atrial fibrillation: Systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A growing body of literature now exists examining associations between social determinants of health (SDOH) and adverse outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation; however, little is available on anticoagulant prescriptions and the impact of SDOH.

PURPOSE

Evaluate the impact of SDOH on anticoagulant prescriptions in patients with atrial fibrillation.

DATA SOURCES

Medline and Embase databases up to January 2021.

STUDY SELECTION

Noninterventional studies were included if they reported associations between at least 1 of 14 SDOH domains and anticoagulant prescription in patients with atrial fibrillation. Two investigators independently screened and collected data.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two investigators independently screened and collected data.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Meta-analyses using random-effect models evaluated associations between SDOH and receiving an anticoagulant prescription. We included 13 studies, 11 of which were included in meta-analyses that reported on the impact of 9 of the 14 SDOH included in the search. Pooled estimates indicate a 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75, 0.97) lower odds of receiving anticoagulant prescriptions among Black compared to non-Black patients (reported in 6 studies); 0.42 (95% CI: 0.32, 0.55) lower odds of receiving anticoagulant prescriptions among patients with mental illness compared to those without mental illness (2 studies); and a 0.64 (95% CI: 0.42, 0.96) lower likelihood of receiving oral anticoagulant prescription among employed patients compared to unemployed patients (2 studies).

LIMITATIONS

SDOH lack consistent definitions and measures within the electronic health record.

CONCLUSION

The literature reports on only half of the SDOH domains we searched for, indicating that many SDOH are not routinely assessed. Second, social needs impact the decision to prescribe anticoagulants, confirming the need to screen for and address social needs in the clinical setting to support clinicians in providing guideline concordant care to their patients.

REGISTRATION

This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO.

Factors That Affect Time to Switch From Warfarin to a Direct Oral Anticoagulant After Change in the Reimbursement Criteria in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulation therapy is recommended for stroke prevention in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to estimate the time to switch from warfarin to a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and identify the factors associated with it.

METHODS

By using claims data, we studied 7111 warfarin-using patients with nonvalvular AF who were aged ≥65 years. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to estimate the time to switch from warfarin to a DOAC, and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to estimate the influencing factors.

RESULTS

Approximately one-third of the patients (2403, 33.8%) switched from warfarin to a DOAC during the study period. Female sex, aged between 75 and 79 years, having a Medical Aid or Patriots and Veterans Insurance, hypertension, and history of prior stroke, and transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism (prior stroke/TIA/TE) were associated with a significantly shorter time to switch. The odds of switching to a DOAC were increased by approximately 1.2-fold in the women and 1.4-fold in the patients with prior stroke/TIA/TE.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one-third of the warfarin-using patients switched from warfarin to a DOAC within 6 months after the change in the DOAC reimbursement criteria. In the Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, the factors that affected anticoagulant switching from warfarin to a DOAC were female sex and history of prior stroke/TIA/TE.

Risk of bleeding in hospitalized patients on anticoagulant therapy: Prevalence and potential risk factors

INTRODUCTION

Bleeding is the most important complication of treatment with anticoagulant therapy. Although several studies have identified risk factors of bleeding in outpatients, no studies have been performed that evaluated prevalence and potential risk factors of bleeding in hospitalized patients treated with anticoagulant therapy.

METHODS

The primary objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of bleeding in anticoagulant users during hospitalization. The secondary objective was to identify potential risk factors of bleeding in hospitalized patients on anticoagulant therapy. A prospective, observational cohort study was conducted in two Dutch hospitals. Adult patients hospitalized between October 2015 and October 2016 treated with anticoagulant therapy were included. Bleeding was defined as a composite endpoint of major bleeding and non-major bleeding according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Heamostasis (ISTH) criteria. Data analysis was performed by multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

The prevalence of in-hospital bleeding in patients using anticoagulant therapy was 7.2%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 5.5-9.1 (65 out of 906 patients). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that female gender (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj] 2.1; 95% CI 1.2-3.7), high-bleeding-risk surgical procedure (ORadj 5.3; 95% CI 2.7-10.2), low-bleeding-risk surgical procedure (ORadj 4.9; 95% CI 1.9-12.6), and non-surgical interventions (ORadj 6.2; 95% CI 3.0-12.6) were associated with bleeding events in hospitalized patients treated with anticoagulants.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of bleeding in anticoagulant users during hospitalization was 7.2%. This study detected potential risk factors that can help to identify patients on anticoagulants who have an increased risk of bleeding during hospitalization.

Development of a clinical prediction model for an international normalised ratio ≥ 4·5 in hospitalised patients using vitamin K antagonists

Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) used for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease, increase the risk of bleeding complications. We developed and validated a model to predict the risk of an international normalised ratio (INR) ≥ 4·5 during a hospital stay. Adult patients admitted to a tertiary hospital and treated with VKAs between 2006 and 2010 were analysed. Bleeding risk was operationalised as an INR value ≥4·5. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between potential predictors and an INR ≥ 4·5 and validated in an independent cohort of patients from the same hospital between 2011 and 2014. We identified 8996 admissions of patients treated with VKAs, of which 1507 (17%) involved an INR ≥ 4·5. The final model included the following predictors: gender, age, concomitant medication and several biochemical parameters. Temporal validation showed a c statistic of 0·71. We developed and validated a clinical prediction model for an INR ≥ 4·5 in VKA-treated patients admitted to our hospital. The model includes factors that are collected during routine care and are extractable from electronic patient records, enabling easy use of this model to predict an increased bleeding risk in clinical practice.

Sex Differences in the Use of Oral Anticoagulants for Atrial Fibrillation: A Report From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR®) PINNACLE Registry

BACKGROUND

Despite higher thromboembolism risk, women with atrial fibrillation have lower oral anticoagulation (OAC) use compared to men. The influence of the CHA2DS2-VASc score or the introduction of non-vitamin K OACs on this relationship is not known.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using the PINNACLE National Cardiovascular Data Registry from 2008 to 2014, we compared the association of sex with OAC use (warfarin or non-vitamin K OACs) overall and by CHA2DS2-VASc score and examined temporal trends in OAC use by sex. Multivariable regression models assessed the association between sex and OAC use in those with CHA2DS2-VASc scores ≥2. Temporal analyses assessed changes in OAC use by sex over time. Of the 691 906 atrial fibrillation patients, 48.5% were women. Women were significantly less likely than men to use any OAC overall (56.7% versus 61.3%; P<0.001) and at all levels of CHA2DS2-VASc score (adjusted risk ratio 9% to 33% lower, all P<0.001). Compared to other thromboembolic risk factors, female sex was associated with lower use of OAC (risk ratio 0.90, 95%CI 0.90-0.91). Over time, non-vitamin K OAC use increased at a slightly higher rate in women (56.2% increase per year, 95%CI 54.6% to 57.9%) compared to men (53.6% increase per year, 95%CI 52.0% to 55.2%), yet women remained less likely to receive any OAC at all time points (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with atrial fibrillation, women were significantly less likely to receive OAC at all levels of the CHA2DS2-VASc score. Despite increasing non-vitamin K OAC use, women had persistently lower rates of OAC use compared to men over time.

Bridging the gender gap in atrial fibrillation

Women have a similar lifetime prevalence of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) compared with that of men. Given the significant morbidity and potential mortality associated with NVAF, it is crucial to understand gender differences with NVAF. Women can be more symptomatic than men. Despite a higher baseline stroke risk, they are less likely to be on anticoagulation. Women have a greater risk of thromboembolism and a similar rate of bleeding risk compared with men on anticoagulation. Initial experience suggests that novel oral anticoagulants have similar safety and efficacy profile in men and women. Although women can have more adverse reactions from antiarrhythmic therapies, they are often referred later than men for ablation. As a group, a mitigating factor in ablation referral is that women also have a higher incidence of procedural complications from catheter ablation. This review summarizes the available literature highlighting significant gender-based differences and also highlights areas for research to improve NVAF outcomes in women.

ABO-incompatible kidney transplant recipients have a higher bleeding risk after antigen-specific immunoadsorption

Pretransplant removal of antiblood group ABO antibodies is the cornerstone of all current ABO-incompatible (ABOi) transplantation programmes. In our protocol, plasmapheresis (PP) is performed with a plasmafilter followed by immunoadsorption (IA) of anti-ABO antibodies. The bleeding complications of this technique are not known. We analysed the data of all 65 consecutive ABOi kidney transplantations between March 2006 and October 2013 and compared these with matched 130 ABO-compatible (ABOc) kidney transplantations. Cases differed from controls in the pre-operative regimen, which included IA-PP and rituximab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone and immunoglobulines. Data on platelet count, blood loss and red blood cell (EC) transfusions during 48 h postoperatively were collected. ABOi patients received EC transfusions more frequently than controls (29% vs. 12%, P = 0.005). Intra-operative blood loss was higher (544 vs. 355 ml, P < 0.005) and they experienced more major bleeding (≥3 EC within 24 h, 15% vs. 2%, P < 0.0005). Platelet count decreased by 28% after the pre-operative IA. In a multivariate model, only the number of pre-operative IAs was associated with the number of ECs given (OR per IA 1.9, P < 0.05). ABOi kidney transplant recipients have a high postoperative bleeding risk, correlating with the number of pre-operative IA sessions performed.