Endocardial-epicardial distribution of myocardial perfusion reserve assessed by multidetector computed tomography in symptomatic patients without significant coronary artery disease: insights from the CORE320 multicentre study

Ischemia with non-obstructive coronary artery (INOCA): Non-invasive versus invasive techniques for diagnosis and the role of #FullPhysiology

Ischemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) is an increasingly recognized entity. It encompasses different pathophysiological subtypes (i.e., endotypes), including coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), vasospastic angina (VSA) and mixed entities resulting from the variable combination of both. Diagnosing INOCA and precisely characterizing the endotype allows for accurate medical treatment and has proven prognostic implications. A breadth of diagnostic technique is available, ranging from non-invasive approaches to invasive coronary angiography adjuvated by functional assessment and provocative tests. This review summarizes the strength and limitations of these methodologies and provides the rationale for the routine referral for invasive angiography and functional assessment in this subset of patients.

Approach to Imaging of Patients Presenting With Acute Coronary Syndrome With No Culprit Lesion Identified at Angiography

Chest pain is a common chief complaint among patients presenting to the emergency department. However, in the scenario where the clinical presentation is consistent with acute coronary syndrome and no culprit lesions are identified on angiography, clinicians and cardiac imagers should be informed of the differential diagnosis and appropriate imaging modalities used to investigate the potential causes. This review describes an imaging-based algorithm that highlights the diagnostic possibilities, their differentiating imaging features, and the important role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for narrowing the differential diagnosis.

Strengths and weaknesses of alternative noninvasive imaging approaches for microvascular ischemia

Structural and functional abnormalities of coronary microvasculature are highly prevalent in several clinical settings and often associated with worse clinical outcomes. Therefore, there is a growing interest in the detection and treatment of this, often overlooked, disease. Coronary angiography allows the assessment of the Coronary flow reserve (CFR) and the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR). However, the measurement of these parameters is not always feasible because of limited technical availability and the need for a cardiac catheterization with a small but real risk of potential complications. Recent advances in non-invasive imaging techniques allow the assessment of coronary microvascular function with good accuracy and reproducibility. The objective of this review is to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of alternative non-invasive approaches used in the diagnosis of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), highlighting the most recent advances for each imaging modality.

Сoronary paradox

This work is a scientific and educational analytical review intended for practicing cardiologists. The purpose of the review is to draw physicians’ attention to the role of myocardial contractility in the regulation of coronary circulation. We consider the fundamental phenomenon of arterial compression (squeezing) in the left ventricular (LV) wall, creating an obstruction to blood flow during cardiac systole. This phenomenon formally resembles functional coronary artery stenosis. Based on a review of the literature, the positive role of arterial compression in coronary hemodynamics is interpreted. Understanding the mechanical relationship between the contractile and coronary systems in the cardiac wall may be useful for practicing physicians when choosing treatment tactics for patients, optimizing LV bypass during heart surgeries, and improving the efficiency of adaptation of the transplanted heart.

Common Shared Pathogenic Aspects of Small Vessels in Heart and Brain Disease

Small-vessel disease (SVD), also known as microvascular endothelial dysfunction, is a disorder with negative consequences for various organs such as the heart and brain. Impaired dilatation and constriction of small vessels in the heart lead to reduced blood flow and ischemia independently of coronary artery disease (CAD) and are associated with major cardiac events. SVD is usually a silent form of subcortical vascular burden in the brain with various clinical manifestations, such as silent-lacunar-ischemic events and confluent white-matter hyperintensities. Imaging techniques are the main help for clinicians to diagnose cardiac and brain SVD correctly. Markers of inflammation, such as C-reactive protein, tumor-necrosis-factor α, and interleukin 6, provide insight into the disease and markers that negatively influence nitric-oxide bioavailability and promote oxidative stress. Unfortunately, the therapeutic approach against SVD is still not well-defined. In the last decades, various antioxidants, oxidative stress inhibitors, and superoxide scavengers have been the target of extensive investigations due to their potential therapeutic effect, but with unsatisfactory results. In clinical practice, traditional anti-ischemic and risk-reduction therapies for CAD are currently in use for SVD treatment.

Multimodality imaging approach to left ventricular dysfunction in diabetes: an expert consensus document from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging

Heart failure (HF) is among the most important and frequent complications of diabetes mellitus (DM). The detection of subclinical dysfunction is a marker of HF risk and presents a potential target for reducing incident HF in DM. Left ventricular (LV) dysfunction secondary to DM is heterogeneous, with phenotypes including predominantly systolic, predominantly diastolic, and mixed dysfunction. Indeed, the pathogenesis of HF in this setting is heterogeneous. Effective management of this problem will require detailed phenotyping of the contributions of fibrosis, microcirculatory disturbance, abnormal metabolism, and sympathetic innervation, among other mechanisms. For this reason, an imaging strategy for the detection of HF risk needs to not only detect subclinical LV dysfunction (LVD) but also characterize its pathogenesis. At present, it is possible to identify individuals with DM at increased risk HF, and there is evidence that cardioprotection may be of benefit. However, there is insufficient justification for HF screening, because we need stronger evidence of the links between the detection of LVD, treatment, and improved outcome. This review discusses the options for screening for LVD, the potential means of identifying the underlying mechanisms, and the pathways to treatment.

Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Complete Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) has shown great technological improvements over the last 2 decades. High accuracy of CTA in detecting significant coronary stenosis has promoted CTA as a substitute for conventional invasive coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. In patients with coronary stenosis, CTA-derived physiological assessment is surrogate for intracoronary pressure and velocity wires, and renders possible decision-making about revascularization solely based on computed tomography. Computed tomography coronary anatomy with functionality assessment could potentially become a first line in diagnosis. Noninvasive imaging assessment of plaque burden and morphology is becoming a valuable substitute for intravascular imaging. Recently, wall shear stress and perivascular inflammation have been introduced. These assessments could support risk management for both primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention. Anatomy, functionality, and plaque composition by CTA tend to replace invasive assessment. Complete CTA assessment could provide a 1-stop-shop for diagnosis, risk management, and decision-making on treatment.

Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: PET, CMR and CT Assessment

Microvascular dysfunction is responsible for chest pain in various kinds of patients, including those with obstructive coronary artery disease and persistent symptoms despite revascularization, or those with myocardial disease without coronary stenosis. Its diagnosis can be performed with an advanced imaging technique such as positron emission tomography, which represents the gold standard for diagnosing microvascular abnormalities. In recent years, cardiovascular magnetic resonance and cardiac computed tomography have demonstrated to be emerging modalities for microcirculation assessment. The identification of microvascular disease represents a fundamental step in the characterization of patients with chest pain and no epicardial coronary disease: its identification is important to manage medical strategies and improve prognosis. The present overview summarizes the main techniques and current evidence of these advanced imaging strategies in assessing microvascular dysfunction and, if present, their relationship with invasive evaluation.

Diagnostic value of quantitative parameters for myocardial perfusion assessment in patients with suspected coronary artery disease by single- and dual-energy computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging

Purpose

To compare performance of visual and quantitative analyses for detecting myocardial ischaemia from single- and dual-energy computed tomography (CT) in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods

Eighty-four patients with suspected CAD were scheduled for dual-energy cardiac CT at rest (CTA) and pharmacological stress (CTP). Myocardial CT perfusion was analysed visually and using three parameters: mean attenuation density (MA), transmural perfusion ratio (TPR) and myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI), on both single-energy CT and CT-based iodine images. Significant CAD was defined in AHA-segments by concomitant myocardial hypoperfusion identified visually or quantitatively (parameter < threshold) and coronary stenosis detected by CTA. Single-photon emission CT and invasive coronary angiography were used as reference. Perfusion-parameter cut-off values were calculated in a randomly-selected subgroup of 30 patients.

Results

The best-performing thresholds for TPR, MPRI and MA were 0.96, 23 and 0.5 for single-energy CT and 0.97, 47 and 0.3 for iodine imaging. For both CT-imaging modalities, TPR yielded the highest area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0.99 and 0.97 for single-energy CT and iodine imaging, respectively, in vessel-based analysis) compared to visual analysis, MA and MPRI. Visual interpretation on iodine imaging resulted in higher AUC compared to that on single-energy CT in per-vessel (AUC: 0.93 vs 0.86, respectively) and per-patient (0.94 vs 0.93) analyses.

Conclusion

Transmural perfusion ratio on both CT-imaging modalities is the best-performing parameter for detecting myocardial ischaemia compared to visual method and other perfusion parameters. Visual analysis on CT-based iodine imaging outperforms that on single-energy CT.

Consistency of Positron Emission Tomography and Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography in Diagnosing Mental Stress-Induced Myocardial Ischemia: Study Protocol of a Prospective Study-Background, Design and Method

Mental stress-induced myocardial ischemia (MSIMI) has attracted increasing attention in the last 30 y. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is among the most accurate methods for evaluating myocardial perfusion. Even so, echocardiography seems to be a more harmless option when the radiation exposure and high expense of PET/CT are considered. To date, no previous studies have compared the consistency between echocardiography and PET/CT in the diagnosis of MSIMI. The primary aim of this research was to compare the consistency of myocardial contrast echocardiography and PET/CT in diagnosing MSIMI in women with angina symptom/ischemia but no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA). Fifty adult female patients with INOCA were recruited for a 12-min-long mental stress test. Each patient underwent both echocardiography and PET/CT at baseline and during mental stress testing; the interval between the two examinations was 1-3 d and the sequence was assigned naturally. MSIMI is defined by a summed difference score (SDS) ≥3 on PET-CT during mental stress testing. It is also defined by new abnormal wall motion, ejection fraction reduction ≥5%, and/or development of ischemic ST change on the electrocardiogram during mental stress testing. This study examined the consistency of PET/CT and myocardial contrast echocardiography in diagnosing MSIMI.

Low-dose CT perfusion with combined use of CTP and CTP-derived coronary CT angiography at 70 kVp: validation with invasive fractional flow reserve

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the diagnostic performance of 70-kVp stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion (CTP) as a low-dose, one-stop cardiac CT examination in clinical application.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive symptomatic patients were prospectively recruited and scanned with stress dynamic myocardial CTP. The CTP phase with the best enhancement of the coronary arteries was selected and extracted as the CTP-derived single-phase coronary CT angiography (SP-CTA). The diagnostic performance of CTP and CTP+SP-CTA for functionally significant CAD was assessed. Invasive coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve were used as the reference standard for the myocardial ischemia evaluation.

RESULTS

In total, 71 patients (43 men and 28 women; 63.6 ± 8.8 years old) underwent the stress dynamic myocardial CTP; 63 vessels (36.2%) from 42 of the patients (59.2%) were identified as causing ischemia. On a per-vessel basis, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy for CTP and CTP+SP-CTA were 77.8%, 93.7%, 87.5%, 88.1%, and 87.9% and 84.1%, 93.7%, 88.3%, 91.2%, and 90.2%, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) of CTP+SP-CTA (AUC = 0.963; 95%CI, 0.938-0.989) was significantly superior to that of CTP (AUC = 0.922; 95%CI, 0.880-0.964) and that of SP-CTA (AUC = 0.833; 95%CI, 0.765-0.900) alone (all p < 0.01). The mean radiation dose of the CTP examination was 3.8 ± 1.4 mSv.

CONCLUSION

CTP-derived SP-CTA improved the diagnostic value of CTP. With a promising performance of myocardial ischemia detection and low radiation dose, the innovative low-dose, one-stop CTP examination is clinically feasible for patients who need to receive a myocardial perfusion assessment.

KEY POINTS

• Myocardial CTP performed well in the evaluation of hemodynamically significant CAD. • CTP-derived single-phase CCTA improved the diagnostic value of CTP. • The combined use of low-dose CTP and CTP-derived CCTA at 70 kVp is clinically feasible for CAD patients who need to receive a myocardial perfusion assessment.

Clinical quantitative cardiac imaging for the assessment of myocardial ischaemia

Cardiac imaging has a pivotal role in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of ischaemic heart disease. SPECT is most commonly used for clinical myocardial perfusion imaging, whereas PET is the clinical reference standard for the quantification of myocardial perfusion. MRI does not involve exposure to ionizing radiation, similar to echocardiography, which can be performed at the bedside. CT perfusion imaging is not frequently used but CT offers coronary angiography data, and invasive catheter-based methods can measure coronary flow and pressure. Technical improvements to the quantification of pathophysiological parameters of myocardial ischaemia can be achieved. Clinical consensus recommendations on the appropriateness of each technique were derived following a European quantitative cardiac imaging meeting and using a real-time Delphi process. SPECT using new detectors allows the quantification of myocardial blood flow and is now also suited to patients with a high BMI. PET is well suited to patients with multivessel disease to confirm or exclude balanced ischaemia. MRI allows the evaluation of patients with complex disease who would benefit from imaging of function and fibrosis in addition to perfusion. Echocardiography remains the preferred technique for assessing ischaemia in bedside situations, whereas CT has the greatest value for combined quantification of stenosis and characterization of atherosclerosis in relation to myocardial ischaemia. In patients with a high probability of needing invasive treatment, invasive coronary flow and pressure measurement is well suited to guide treatment decisions. In this Consensus Statement, we summarize the strengths and weaknesses as well as the future technological potential of each imaging modality.

Functional Information in Coronary Artery Disease: The Case of Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review methodological and logistical aspects of CT myocardial perfusion, current clinical evidence and possible future directions, with specific focus on use in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

RECENT FINDINGS

CT myocardial perfusion imaging may be performed as an add-on to standard coronary CT angiography (CCTA), to identify regions of myocardial hypoperfusion, at rest and during adenosine stress. The principle of measurement is well-validated in animal experimental models, and CT myocardial perfusion imaging has a high degree of concordance with already clinically available perfusion imaging methods. Combining CCTA and CT myocardial perfusion imaging increases the diagnostic accuracy to identify patients with CAD associated with ischemia. In patients suspected of CAD, CCTA frequently detects coronary atherosclerotic lesions, in which revascularization could be clinically beneficial. CT myocardial perfusion imaging may be helpful to identify coronary lesions associated with myocardial ischemia, and thus potentially suitable for coronary intervention.

Quantitative Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Function: Dynamic Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography, Positron Emission Tomography, Ultrasound, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

A healthy, functional microcirculation in combination with nonobstructed epicardial coronary arteries is the prerequisite of normal myocardial perfusion. Quantitative assessment in myocardial perfusion and determination of absolute myocardial blood flow can be achieved noninvasively using dynamic imaging with multiple imaging modalities. Extensive evidence supports the clinical value of noninvasively assessing indices of coronary flow for diagnosing coronary microvascular dysfunction; in certain diseases, the degree of coronary microvascular impairment carries important prognostic relevance. Although, currently positron emission tomography is the most commonly used tool for the quantification of myocardial blood flow, other modalities, including single-photon emission computed tomography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and myocardial contrast echocardiography, have emerged as techniques with great promise for determination of coronary microvascular dysfunction. The following review will describe basic concepts of coronary and microvascular physiology, review available modalities for dynamic imaging for quantitative assessment of coronary perfusion and myocardial blood flow, and discuss their application in distinct forms of coronary microvascular dysfunction.

Dynamic Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Comparison of Clinical Analysis Methods for the Detection of Vessel-Specific Ischemia

BACKGROUND

The clinical analysis of myocardial dynamic computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging lacks standardization. The objective of this prospective study was to compare different analysis approaches to diagnose ischemia in patients with stable angina referred for invasive coronary angiography.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients referred for evaluation of stable angina symptoms underwent adenosine-stress dynamic computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging with a second-generation dual-source scanner. Quantitative perfusion parameters, such as blood flow, were calculated by parametric deconvolution for each myocardial voxel. Initially, perfusion parameters were extracted according to standard 17-segment model of the left ventricle (fully automatic analysis). These were then manually sampled by an operator (semiautomatic analysis). Areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves of the 2 different approaches were compared. Invasive fractional flow reserve ≤0.80 or diameter stenosis ≥80% on quantitative coronary angiography was used as reference standard to define ischemia. We enrolled 115 patients (88 men; age 57±9 years). There were 72 of 286 (25%) vessels causing ischemia in 52 of 115 (45%) patients. The semiautomatic analysis method was better than the fully automatic method at predicting ischemia (areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves, 0.87 versus 0.69; P<0.001) with readings obtained in the endocardial myocardium performing better than those in the epicardial myocardium (areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves, 0.87 versus 0.72; P<0.001). The difference in performance between blood flow, expressed as relative to remote myocardium, and absolute blood flow was not statistically significant (areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves, 0.90 versus 0.87; P=ns).

CONCLUSIONS

Endocardial perfusion parameters obtained by semiautomatic analysis of dynamic computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging may permit robust discrimination between coronary vessels causing ischemia versus not causing ischemia.