Bisoprolol in the treatment of angina pectoris: a double blind comparison with verapamil

Therapeutic Properties of Highly Selective β-blockers With or Without Additional Vasodilator Properties: Focus on Bisoprolol and Nebivolol in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease

Bisoprolol and nebivolol are highly selective β₁-adrenoceptor antagonists, with clinical indications in many countries within the management of heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF), ischaemic heart disease (IHD), and hypertension. Nebivolol has additional vasodilator actions, related to enhanced release of NO in the vascular wall. In principle, this additional mechanism compared with bisoprolol might lead to more potent vasodilatation, which in turn might influence the effectiveness of nebivolol in the management of HFrEF, IHD and hypertension. In this article, we review the therapeutic properties of bisoprolol and nebivolol, as representatives of “second generation” and “third generation” β-blockers, respectively. Although head-to-head trials are largely lacking, there is no clear indication from published studies of an additional effect of nebivolol on clinical outcomes in patients with HFrEF or the magnitude of reductions of BP in patients with hypertension.

Stable angina pectoris: the medical management of symptomatic myocardial ischemia

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality and is a serious public health problem. Over the last 4 decades there have been dramatic advances in the both the prevention and treatment of CAD. The management of CAD was revolutionized by the development of effective surgical and percutaneous revascularization techniques. In this review we discuss the importance of the medical management of symptomatic, stable angina. Medical management approaches to both the treatment and prevention of symptomatic myocardial ischemia are summarized. In Canada, organic nitrates, β-adrenergic blocking agents, and calcium channel antagonists have been available for the therapy of angina for more than 25 years. All 3 classes are of proven benefit in the improvement of symptoms and exercise capacity in patients with stable angina. Although there is no clear first choice within these classes of anti-anginal agents, the presence of prior or concurrent conditions (for example, prior myocardial infarction and/or hypertension) plays an important role in the choice of anti-anginal class in individual patients. For some patients, combinations of different anti-anginal agents can be effective; however it is recommended that this approach be individualized. Although not currently available in Canada, other classes of anti-anginal agents have been developed; their mechanism of action and clinical efficacy is discussed. Patients with stable angina have an excellent prognosis. Patients in this category who obtain relief from symptomatic myocardial ischemia may do well without invasive intervention.

Effects of short-term reduction in serum cholesterol with simvastatin in patients with stable angina pectoris and mild to moderate hypercholesterolemia

To evaluate the effects of short-term cholesterol-lowering treatment on myocardial effort ischemia, 22 patients with stable effort ischemia and mild to moderate hypercholesterolemia (low density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol 160 to 220 mg/dl) were randomly allocated at baseline (TO) in 2 groups. Group A included 12 patients treated with simvastatin 10 mg bid; group B included 10 patients treated with placebo. All patients underwent a treadmill electrocardiography (ECG) test; total cholesterol, HDL and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, plasma, and blood viscosity were measured. All tests were repeated after 4 and 12 weeks. For 18 of the same patients (11 taking simvastatin, 7 receiving placebo), forearm strain-gouge plethysmography was performed at baseline and after 4 weeks, both at rest and during reactive hyperemia. At 4 and 12 weeks, group A showed a significant reduction in total cholesterol (p <0.05) and LDL (p <0.05), with unchanged HDL, triglycerides, blood, and plasma viscosity. Effort was unmodified, ST-segment depression at peak effort and ischemic threshold were significantly improved after 4 and 12 weeks (all p <0.05) with unchanged heart rate x systolic blood pressure product. A significant increase in the excess flow response to reactive hyperemia was detected in group A (p <0.03); group B showed no changes in hematochemical and ergometric parameters. These data suggest that cholesterol-lowering treatment is associated with an improvement in myocardial effort ischemia; this might be explained by a more pronounced increase of coronary blood flow and capacity of vasodilation in response to effort.

Bisoprolol: is this just another beta-blocker for hypertension or angina?

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and clinical experience with bisoprolol and make recommendations regarding its potential clinical usefulness, as well as considerations for formulary inclusion.

DATA SOURCES

Reference citations were sought from Index Medicus and Science Citation Index. Data were collected from abstracts and articles describing experimental studies or blind clinical trials.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies designed in a randomized, blind, and placebo-controlled manner were emphasized. Studies also were included if bisoprolol was evaluated comparatively with other agents in a randomized, blind fashion.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data from human studies published in English were evaluated. Studies were assessed by sample size and the clarity of descriptions of methods and results.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Bisoprolol reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressures in patients with hypertension for a 24-hour dosing interval and is associated with beneficial hemodynamic effects in patients with myocardial ischemia. It is devoid of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity and membrane-stabilizing effects at therapeutic dosages. In patients with hypertension, bisoprolol diminishes plasma renin activity, platelet aggregation, effective renal plasma flow, and creatinine clearance. Bisoprolol has minimal effects on glucose tolerance and plasma lipid profiles. Monotherapy with bisoprolol is as effective as with atenolol, nitrendipine, or nifedipine. Low-dose combination therapy with hydrochlorothiazide is at least as effective as either bisoprolol or hydrochlorothiazide alone. Preliminary experience in the management of angina pectoris suggests that bisoprolol is at least as efficacious as atenolol or verapamil. Thus far, reported adverse effects are similar to those of other beta-blockers. No clinically important drug interactions have been reported at this time.